QueenZone discussion #485394

Inu Yasha (a.k.a. Lum's Stormtrooper) wrote: I think it should be taken off this website

YourValentine wrote: If santiago is a "sick fuck", I am one too because I uploaded the picture. It's not porn at all, that's just ridiculous. It's a matter of taste if you like the picture (I don't like it) but why in all the world do people call for censorship whenever they don't like something?

Brimon wrote: What a lot of fuss over nothing. One or two of you need to get a grip of yourselves. I know I have.

YourValentine wrote: If santiago is a "sick fuck", I am one too because I uploaded the picture. It's not porn at all, that's just ridiculous. It's a matter of taste if you like the picture (I don't like it) but why in all the world do people call for censorship whenever they don't like something?

Bohardy wrote: Before you continue any further on your little moral crusade Dark, I thought I'd provide you with some more evidence of the shameful pornography that sullies the othewise puritan haven that is Queenzone. Behold the filth! link link link Lets look at the combined total of pornography (or almost pornography) instances so far, shall we? Can almost see: About 22 tits and about 8 vaginas. Can actually see: About 25 tits, 2 complete sets of female buttocks. And I fear that's just the tip of the iceberg. I'm sure there's a fuller picture of the Jazz poster for starters.

YourValentine wrote: First it's porn, now it's inappropriate. This is a fan website and not a kindergarten. I never noticed that you, Dark, took much care to use a language that is "appropriate" for small children.

wstüssyb wrote: what you getting all worked up about this dark, didnt you say sometime ago about you preforming oral sex on your self or something like that?

Barry_UK wrote: that's nearly porn.

geeksandgeeks wrote:

Barry_UK wrote: that's nearly porn.

Nearly? What would ACTUAL porn look like?

wstüssyb wrote: pretty sure i asked dark if he did that and he said yes I still remember Janet asking the topic to go no further.

Banquo wrote: link Tie your mother down indeed. I'm lost for words.

written_in_the_stars wrote:

Inu Yasha (a.k.a. Lum's Stormtrooper) wrote: I think it should be taken off this website

I agree... it is porn

written_in_the_stars wrote:

Bohardy wrote: Before you continue any further on your little moral crusade Dark, I thought I'd provide you with some more evidence of the shameful pornography that sullies the othewise puritan haven that is Queenzone. Behold the filth! link link link Lets look at the combined total of pornography (or almost pornography) instances so far, shall we? Can almost see: About 22 tits and about 8 vaginas. Can actually see: About 25 tits, 2 complete sets of female buttocks. And I fear that's just the tip of the iceberg. I'm sure there's a fuller picture of the Jazz poster for starters.

Have you heard of the photograph Spencer Tunick ? He photographs hundreds of nude bodies laying on the ground. And it isn't porn - it is ART. It's the same thing for the Jazz poster, it has nothing to do with porn ... It's only naked girls riding bikes - I see it as art. It shouldn't shock anyone. But the picture we are talking about is showing girls in an obscene position - THAT is porn.

ryancoke wrote:

Banquo wrote: link Tie your mother down indeed. I'm lost for words.

How about "that turns me on"?

Banquo wrote:

ryancoke wrote:

Banquo wrote: link Tie your mother down indeed. I'm lost for words.

How about "that turns me on"?

Because, however small, I can see John Deacon's face staring out at me. That'll put anyone off.

inu-liger wrote:

wstüssyb wrote: what you getting all worked up about this dark, didnt you say sometime ago about you preforming oral sex on your self or something like that?

No, I didn't. You're probably thinking of Baer or Britt.

wstüssyb wrote: pretty sure i asked dark if he did that and he said yes I still remember Janet asking the topic to go no further.

inu-liger wrote: Honestly, I think it should be taken, as at the least, it comes CLOSE to being pornography, because you can ALMOST see that girl's vagina. This should, again, be taken down.

inu-liger wrote: Jake, you're a sick fucking creep.

inu-liger wrote: Jake, you're a sick fucking creep.

Penetration_Guru wrote:

inu-liger wrote: Jake, you're a sick fucking creep.

There speaks an expert....

P-Staker wrote:

inu-liger wrote: Honestly, I think it should be taken, as at the least, it comes CLOSE to being pornography, because you can ALMOST see that girl's vagina. This should, again, be taken down.

Oh, no, not a VAGINA!!! I mean, what would Jakob Ammann say?!

inu-liger wrote:

Penetration_Guru wrote:

inu-liger wrote: Jake, you're a sick fucking creep.

There speaks an expert....

O RLY :-P

inu-liger wrote:

P-Staker wrote:

inu-liger wrote: Honestly, I think it should be taken, as at the least, it comes CLOSE to being pornography, because you can ALMOST see that girl's vagina. This should, again, be taken down.

Oh, no, not a VAGINA!!! I mean, what would Jakob Ammann say?!

I don't know what the hell I was thinking then......... -.-' Surely wasn't smoking some of 'that', I'll tell you that much! Btw. isn't Jakob Ammann a pro drummer? That name rings a bell...

Play The Game wrote:

inu-liger wrote:

Penetration_Guru wrote:

inu-liger wrote: Jake, you're a sick fucking creep.

There speaks an expert....

O RLY :-P

He was making fun of you, I think.

Play The Game wrote:

inu-liger wrote:

P-Staker wrote:

inu-liger wrote: Honestly, I think it should be taken, as at the least, it comes CLOSE to being pornography, because you can ALMOST see that girl's vagina. This should, again, be taken down.

Oh, no, not a VAGINA!!! I mean, what would Jakob Ammann say?!

I don't know what the hell I was thinking then......... -.-' Surely wasn't smoking some of 'that', I'll tell you that much! Btw. isn't Jakob Ammann a pro drummer? That name rings a bell...

At the same time this thread was made, you were admitting to having a big porno collection.

inu-pedo wrote:

Play The Game wrote:

inu-pedo wrote:

P-Staker wrote:

inu-pedo wrote: Honestly, I think it should be taken, as at the least, it comes CLOSE to being pornography, because you can ALMOST see that girl's vagina. This should, again, be taken down.

Oh, no, not a VAGINA!!! I mean, what would Jakob Ammann say?!

I don't know what the hell I was thinking then......... -.-' Surely wasn't smoking some of 'that', I'll tell you that much! Btw. isn't Jakob Ammann a pro drummer? That name rings a bell...

At the same time this thread was made, you were admitting to having a big porno collection.

Your point being?

Play The Game wrote:

inu-pedo wrote:

Play The Game wrote:

inu-pedo wrote:

P-Staker wrote:

inu-pedo wrote: Honestly, I think it should be taken, as at the least, it comes CLOSE to being pornography, because you can ALMOST see that girl's vagina. This should, again, be taken down.

Oh, no, not a VAGINA!!! I mean, what would Jakob Ammann say?!

I don't know what the hell I was thinking then......... -.-' Surely wasn't smoking some of 'that', I'll tell you that much! Btw. isn't Jakob Ammann a pro drummer? That name rings a bell...

At the same time this thread was made, you were admitting to having a big porno collection.

Your point being?

Hypocrite!

Erin wrote: Hey...I've got that poster.  I wouldn't hang it up, though. [img=/images/smiley/msn/tounge_smile.gif][/img]

Erin wrote: Thanks for the offer, but I think I'll hang onto it.  It's nasty, but collectable. [img=/images/smiley/msn/wink_smile.gif][/img]

Holly2003 wrote:

  Erin wrote: Thanks for the offer, but I think I'll hang onto it.  It's nasty, but collectable. [img=/images/smiley/msn/wink_smile.gif][/img]

In all seriousness, how much do your reckon it's worth? I think I saw one on Ebay a while back for silly money. Until I saw it on here I thought it was a fake but obvioulsy not.