| Shane Jazz 17.07.2006 13:22 |
Greg- I know there has been a lot (and I mean A LOT!) of friction on this board of late. Things are quickly escalating out of hand in terms of your relationship with the very fans that are your target audience. Remember, this Queen Anthology is not designed for a casual listener who happens to like his father's copy of The Game. The very people on this board are the ones that are going to buy your finished product. To cut to the chase, it would be very easy to slag you off and curse and swear and write you off a second rate hack. But, although we might not all support your chemistry of late with the members of this board, I for one have to say that I am willing to give you any benefit of the doubt simply because the Freddie Mercury Box Set was SUPERB. It is my absolute favorite Queen related item, and I commend your work on it. I find myself returning to it on a weekly basis. Not just the music, but the wonderful accompanying book and notes. You did an excellent job. No one on here had ever really heard of a Love Makin' Love or a She Blows Hot & Cold with BHM playing on it before. I just hope people don't forget how thoroughly solid a product the Freddie box set turned out to be. That is why I, and hopefully many others, haven't lost their faith in you. And I hope you haven't lost your faith in us as well. PS- I remember when I first got ahold of the Queen Live book. It was such a source of joy for me for such a long period of time that I never, ever begrudge you the errors in it. I could see in your writing that you were a deeply impassioned Queen fan, and at the end of the day, that is all that matters. I wish you the best of luck on the Queen Anthology, and I would like to see a general cease fire enacted around here. We want to like you Greg, trust me, we really do. |
| DreaminQueen 17.07.2006 14:01 |
Dear Mr. Brooks, As a younger Queen fan and in the US i am at a SINCERE disadvantage, i dont have access to many things. I have not obtained QUEEN LIVE or the Freddie Box set as of yet. But i see them in my future. And I have heard nothing but good things regarding the Freddie Box Set. I wish i could be of help to you and your job. I am looking forward to any future things QP has in store. And these constant fights worry me. Because as the Queen Archivist and us being fans, we should be working together, not insulting eachother trying to make WWIII. But I havent been following it to know whats what clearly and concisely. Except I have felt semi- insulted by what you've said about QZers. But they arent directed at me and im taking them as venting of frustrations. Because it cannot be easy doing a job and having everyone bitch at you constantly, so usually i let it roll off my back. Perhaps we can start building friendships amongst eachother instead of enemies. No attacks at you personally. I would like a few questions answered if i may. But thats up to you. I realize you have much on your plate already. Good Luck... *cheers* -DreaminQueen- |
| AlexRocks 17.07.2006 15:20 |
You seem cool to me Mr. Brooks. I don't know what the deal is with some people...oh! I know! Ignore them, eh! |
| Micrówave 17.07.2006 16:02 |
Shane Jazz wrote: I am willing to give you any benefit of the doubt simply because the Freddie Mercury Box Set was SUPERB. It is my absolute favorite Queen related item, and I commend your work on it.Agreed. It is my absolute favorite Box Set, Queen or anybody else, and I have quite an assortment! I just hope GB and QZ can end this bloody feud, because I would love to be reading informative posts, and not just the hurlback insults. |
| rocks. 17.07.2006 19:09 |
Yay! A peaceful thread!!! *is happy* :) |
| akindofmagic 17.07.2006 20:44 |
Yep, Freddie Box is very, very good. And i don't have anything but thankfulness to say to Mr. Brooks. Waiting desperatly for the Box sets, specially because Greg said, months ago, that he believe that Queen will have another nº1 in the charts! |
| jcrawford79 17.07.2006 22:59 |
Its kinda nice to see these kinds of posts. It shows that not all on Queenzone feel the way the others do. And that's fine....its an unrestricted forum. But I very much appreciate the work done by Mr. Brooks. |
| AlexRocks 17.07.2006 23:07 |
Gee wiz!!!! There is no question that "The Solo Collection" for Freddie Mercury is the BEST box set of any type of box set of all time in particular with the packaging!!! I wish I could get the word to Michael Jackson about how if he does box sets in the future they have GOT to be like the Freddie Mercury box set as well as favorite t.v. and movie serieses as well!!! It is PHENOMENAL!!!! UNPARRELLELED!!! PIONEERING and the STANDARD for the way box sets should be done!!! |
| PieterMC 17.07.2006 23:18 |
Sorry, at what point did this become GregBrooksZone? |
| AlexRocks 17.07.2006 23:24 |
If you concentrate you might be able to figure out what's going on! |
| Micrówave 18.07.2006 12:14 |
I'd probably say THE POLICE (Message in a box) has the 2nd best, in so far as completeness, but the FM Box/packaging blows it out of the water. Then again, it should, considering it was the most expensive box set I've purchased. I also like the Genesis box, Vol.I only, of course, and the 1st Jethro Tull 20 Years box, because they contained so much rare material and not just a new Stereo 8.3 DTS remix whatever. While I hope the Queen ones are nice, I'm not sure if I'm looking forward to a higher price, especially if this is going to end up being a Volume 1, Volume 2, Volume 3 kind of thing. Some more info on the upcoming box would sure be nice... |
| john bodega 18.07.2006 13:54 |
If they'd just make a Queen equivalent of the Beatles anthology, that'd shut me up. Seriously, that thing's great - a neat booklet with anecdotes and informative blurbs about each track. A seriously long documentary with some interviews and live footage. Ding. Good stuff. I just wish there was a Queen version of the "Kids Are Alright" film. That was genius, just a big long montage of live stuff with funny interviews stashed in it. Genius! |
| Nathan 18.07.2006 13:59 |
Oooops. Ignore my post. |
| John S Stuart 18.07.2006 17:39 |
Queen Archivist wrote: ...and you come here spoiling for a fight, I DON'T ACTUALLY. I REALLY DON'T. I JUST STICK UP FOR MYSELF WHEN I READ UNFOUNDED COMMENTS.Isn't irony delicious? Has John S. Stuart moved into the Queen Archive room and nobody told me? link Sorry if there are children on Moanzone tonight, but I'm gonna spew again.. link GENUINE 'QUEEN LIVE' SERIOUS CHALLENGE FOR QZ-ers. link NEW BOOK ON QUEEN IN THE STUDIO link Greg, for better or worse you are the Official face of the Queen archive, and to write the above under the guise of your authorized title, is both an insult and a slap in the face to us all, and is a blatant misuse of the authority and trust placed in you by the band and fans alike. Any one else would (correctly) be hammered as a spammer. |
| John S Stuart 18.07.2006 17:44 |
Forgive me for repeating myself, but, I am posting this everywhere the Official Queen Archivist can read it, to remind him of the promise he made to me on 11th July 2006 .
Now there is no excuse to say that he did not see it, or that he overlooked my mail.
Therefore, if you a man of your word, and can you please reply to the request below?
John S Stuart wrote: Therefore, I accept your very kind offer;link Queen Archivist: "If John S. Stuart would like to make the extent of his knowledge known to us all, including the things he 'thinks' exist, and he puts it on the table, I will confirm or not that they exist or not. NO confusion, no guessing, no misleading misinformation. John, what do you REALLY know. What do you REALLY have to offer as fact?" As I have been so free with my version of events re: Queen II recording sessions, and I have placed all my knowledge "...on the table", I hope you can oblige and let me know EXACTLY where I have gone wrong. I really look forward to reading your informative reply, John S. Stuart |
| Queen Archivist 26.08.2006 22:01 |
To Shane Jazz, DreamingQueen and Others... who each wrote some nice things about my work on here (a nice change), I thank you. Your comments are constructive, fair, balanced, considered and much appreciated. I too think the Freddie 'Solo' box is a great product. I think it's better and more detailed than most, if not all, the others out there for other artists. There was a small and dedicated team of us on that project, and we cared a lot. I think it's a really intriguing insight into Freddie's studio work. I'm glad you guys like it, and I'm pleased you feel able to say so too - despite the inevitable end result of being slated by other Moanzone bores. Good on ya for saying what you think. Screw them! What do they know anyway. John Stuart KEEPS on posting his irritating repeat message to me, and boring you guys even more than me. Doesn't he YET realise... STILL... that I'm never going to respond to him? Somebody PLEASE tell him, before he stamps his feet and tantrums himself to death like a baby. Tell him... Greg IS NOT going to reply, no matter where he pastes his silly little thing. I have written this 4 times to him. He lives in a dream world. Anyway... thanks for the kind words, for a change, much appreciated. By the way... a lot of detailed work went into the 60,000 word Freddie Mercury: A Life, In His Own Words book, too. I hope you find it an entertaining read. There is much stuff therein you will never have read before... from unpublished interview transcripts. Regards GB |
| rocks. 26.08.2006 22:31 |
Queen Archivist wrote: By the way... a lot of detailed work went into the 60,000 word Freddie Mercury: A Life, In His Own Words book, too. I hope you find it an entertaining read. There is much stuff therein you will never have read before... from unpublished interview transcripts. Regards GBSo deffinitly not from the David Wigg interviews as people were speculating? :) |
| Lester Burnham 26.08.2006 23:50 |
Greg, you ever going to respond to my email? I've sent you several already. |
| Jjeroen 27.08.2006 04:50 |
WhatMustHeThink wrote:Queen Archivist wrote: By the way... a lot of detailed work went into the 60,000 word Freddie Mercury: A Life, In His Own Words book, too. I hope you find it an entertaining read. There is much stuff therein you will never have read before... from unpublished interview transcripts. Regards GB So deffinitly not from the David Wigg interviews as people were speculating? :)Well, it says it on the LOLSOS website: The David Wigg interviews. Greg, does that mean that the audio-book will be, looking at the actual content, be the same as the disc in the (indeed marvellous!) Freddie boxset? And is the release date still planned at the same time as the 'paper' book? |
| Queen Archivist 27.08.2006 08:12 |
The book includes the Wigg interviews, yes, the best and most interesting stuff. Not only from the audio interviews we have (highlights of which appeared on the 73 minute CD on the Solo box), but from the 1985 Munich filmed interview too - which is greatly informative and candid. Not sure when the audio book will emerge - Sept I think - and that is a mixture of the 73 minute CD plus 32 minutes of the very best from the filmed encounter. It's a good overview of most subjects. Lester Burnham... WHAT EMAILS? What are they about? Can you send me a summary. When i know when the Audio book will emerge, I'll let you know. The book contains transcript from EVERY interview in our archive; audio, video, text - and from all newspapers and magazines. EVERYTHING ever printed... I went thrugh it all. It took 18 months, plus 8 months to transcribe the ints not yet transcribed. Then tons of editing in order to present just the good stuff, and no waffle. But of course we left in all the flavour and nuances that made Freddie Freddie. I think it turned out well. GB |
| YourValentine 27.08.2006 08:27 |
"Not sure when the audio book will emerge - Sept I think - and that is a mixture of the 73 minute CD plus 32 minutes of the very best from the filmed encounter. It's a good overview of most subjects." What is the difference between an "audio book" and a CD? Could someone please explain it to me? And if the audio book contains the 73 minutes we already have and if the additional 32 minutes are available on video - why don't we get the video? It's very much easier to follow a video interview than audio - mainly for non-English fans. |
| Queen Archivist 27.08.2006 08:36 |
What is the difference between an "audio book" and a CD? Could someone please explain it to me? And if the audio book contains the 73 minutes we already have and if the additional 32 minutes are available on video - why don't we get the video? It's very much easier to follow a video interview than audio - mainly for non-English fans. In my mind, there is no real difference. It's just a another modern term. This FM audio 'book' (it's not really a book, I mean it is NOT the whole text from our book, it is merely raw unedited recordings strung together). I suppose it is the nearest one canpossibly get to having a Spoken Word version of the new Freddie book. I mean ideally Freddie would/could have sat and read the entire text and that would be a true spoken word book, or audio CD or download. In fact if anyone read it all, itwould be that. But... this will be an internet download thing, not an actual CD. I don't think of it as an audio book myself. I view it more as an edited montage of interview extracts btween Wigg and Freddie. I think it's very good, but it's not like a normal spoken word audio cassette or CD. i think this will be a download only (downloadable in portions, rather than in one huge 105 minute hit). GB |
| on my way up 27.08.2006 08:39 |
Queen Archivist wrote: The book includes the Wigg interviews, yes, the best and most interesting stuff. Not only from the audio interviews we have (highlights of which appeared on the 73 minute CD on the Solo box), but from the 1985 Munich filmed interview too - which is greatly informative and candid. Not sure when the audio book will emerge - Sept I think - and that is a mixture of the 73 minute CD plus 32 minutes of the very best from the filmed encounter. It's a good overview of most subjects. Lester Burnham... WHAT EMAILS? What are they about? Can you send me a summary. When i know when the Audio book will emerge, I'll let you know. The book contains transcript from EVERY interview in our archive; audio, video, text - and from all newspapers and magazines. EVERYTHING ever printed... I went thrugh it all. It took 18 months, plus 8 months to transcribe the ints not yet transcribed. Then tons of editing in order to present just the good stuff, and no waffle. But of course we left in all the flavour and nuances that made Freddie Freddie. I think it turned out well. GBThat looks great. I have to admit that the fred-set is truly amazing. I listened to it over and over again and the book with the pictures is fantastic etc. When I read your book on Queen live, it was a disappointment though. You could have included much more info in it like more reviews and like many others say , there are lots of mistakes. I don't want to offend you , it's just an observation from a fan who wants the correct info! It would be nice if there was more information for us , the die-hard fans, on subjects like:-existing live-footage, existing audiorecording etc. For example: Queen's last concert in knebworth. Are you sure there isn't a videorecording from the bigs screens?There are shots from it in the FM-inserts on the tribute-dvd. A Puebla'81show:there would be a full videorecording of this show.Does Queen Production do all they can to abtain this footage(if they haven't already)? Japan1/5/1975:This show was filmed but does Queen have full video of it. That would be amazing since lots of rare songs were played. You write Brussels '84 was filmed and Alexandra Palace'79. Does that mean there is footage in the archives of these 2 great shows? To me , that's very important.It is to many of us... |
| YourValentine 27.08.2006 08:39 |
"I think it's very good, but it's not like a normal spoken word audio cassette or CD. i think this will be a download only (downloadable in portions, rather than in one huge 105 minute hit)." Thanks for the explanation. Does that mean that we owners of the Freddie box can download just the missing 32 minutes? |
| on my way up 27.08.2006 08:41 |
Please reply;-) |
| Jjeroen 27.08.2006 08:44 |
Thanks for the replies, GB! Too bad though the 'audio book' is a download.. A cd I WOULD have bought happily! Now I think I may have to leave it... Did QP ever consider releasing a set of both the paper book as the audio book? (I personally would have loved that, and to be honest also expected a little I guess ;-) |
| Queen Archivist 27.08.2006 09:11 |
Thanks for the explanation. Does that mean that we owners of the Freddie box can download just the missing 32 minutes? YES I WOULD THINK SO. I don't see why not, because it is structured in pieces. |
| on my way up 27.08.2006 09:14 |
Queen Archivist wrote: Thanks for the explanation. Does that mean that we owners of the Freddie box can download just the missing 32 minutes? YES I WOULD THINK SO. I don't see why not, because it is structured in pieces.That would be great because buying it twice is kinda expensive:-) |
| Queen Archivist 27.08.2006 09:17 |
Did QP ever consider releasing a set of both the paper book as the audio book? (I personally would have loved that, and to be honest also expected a little I guess ;-) This is NOT a Queen Productions thing... none of the Freddie stuff is. It is Mercury Songs - completely separate... as BM said on his site. I too thought about doing a CD with the book, but for various reasons it wasn't possible. Not everything that seems simple, IS actually simple. People own rights to recordings and broadcast rights, etc. It's a shame. Nothing stopping you downloading and bunging it on your own CD. GB |
| Serry... 27.08.2006 09:17 |
Download that is available for people who've bought CD (I don't know - "type special secret code here and you'll be able to download audio book" or something like that - kinda like it was with One Night Stand) or download that you have to pay for? The following tracks are available only on promo singles, right? Living On My Own (Egg Extended Disco Dub) Love Kills (Sunshine People Club Mix) and one of Rank 1 mixes |
| Bobby_brown 27.08.2006 10:29 |
I´m really excited about September! It´s going to be a great month for releases. Freddie Mercury, Iron Maiden, etc. Lot´s of great music. And, as Brian has stated, i think that people are ready to hear the Great solo music from Freddie, and i really believe that it´s going to chart everywhere. Greg, let me just ask you a question or two about the solo stuff (if you can answer this, i really apreciate): - The live Version of "Barcelona" on the upcoming DVD i supose it´s not the Ku Klub Ibiza´87 performance, am i right? If that´s the case why do you think they don´t use this footage in any DVD release so far? Is it for copyright reasons? That´s a great footage, and in my opinion, not using it´s such a waste! - After the Freddie Box, i read that they (Freddie staff) were planning to release the "making of" of his videos. Is this project in line, or definitely abondoned? - Do you think that this type of book (audio download, written) could be released for Queen in the future? Thanks in advance! Take care |
| Lester Burnham 27.08.2006 11:53 |
Greg, I had sent you an email back in July giving you some background on my book because you had started a thread about me and what I had been working on, and that I had wanted to ask you some questions. You initially responded, saying you'd get back to me ASAP but that you'd changed your email address, and I never heard from you again. |
| ern2150 27.08.2006 15:34 |
Greg, I loved the 2000 FM box. Quick question about the new release: Mr. Bad Guy (Bad Circulation) -- this is another "take" of the song, yes? Re-built to be a complete song, kinda like one of the Freddie / Squier tracks off the box? If that's the case, where did you find it? Was it one of the pieces that there just wasn't room for in the original box? Mis-sorted in the Queen reels? Found in a locked cupboard in a disused lavatory with a sign on the front that said "beware of the leopard?" Does this raise your hope at all for further (if extremely rare) "finds"? |
| DreaminQueen 27.08.2006 15:35 |
Nice to see you around again Greg. I would like to point out, that I do share some frustrations of the other fans here waiting for an anthology of sorts to come around. But I have no reason to fight with anyone here over such things, so dont take offense to that, because... At the same time i recognize you have alot of work ahead of you to do as well. So my patience will only have to endure for longer. But good things come in due time as they so say. But I'll save my pennies and get that Freddie box-set someday. But I am looking forward to the things being released for his 60th Birthday. Are they slated for a US release? Rumor has it they are not. If not looks like I'll have to rely on good old amazon.com as always. Cheers... *Dreamin |
| Penetration_Guru 27.08.2006 19:10 |
ern2150 wrote: Found in a locked cupboard in a disused lavatory with a sign on the front that said "beware of the leopard?"Oi, I do the Douglas Adams ripoffs on this site thank you. And I think you'll find it was a filing cabinet. |
| rocks. 27.08.2006 20:35 |
Queen Archivist wrote: The book includes the Wigg interviews, yes, the best and most interesting stuff. Not only from the audio interviews we have (highlights of which appeared on the 73 minute CD on the Solo box), but from the 1985 Munich filmed interview too - which is greatly informative and candid.K, thank you for the answer... |
| That guy who digs energy domes 29.08.2006 00:52 |
Mr Brooks, I want to help in any way that I can, my email is in my profile |
| Pierre 29.08.2006 14:11 |
ern2150 wrote: Greg, I loved the 2000 FM box. Quick question about the new release: Mr. Bad Guy (Bad Circulation) -- this is another "take" of the song, yes? Re-built to be a complete song, kinda like one of the Freddie / Squier tracks off the box? If that's the case, where did you find it? Was it one of the pieces that there just wasn't room for in the original box? Mis-sorted in the Queen reels? Found in a locked cupboard in a disused lavatory with a sign on the front that said "beware of the leopard?" Does this raise your hope at all for further (if extremely rare) "finds"?Living on My Own (the Egg Remix) seems also be another take (maybe acappella ? ) begins with Freddie counting down 1,2,3,4 . |
| Lester Burnham 30.08.2006 22:08 |
I'm going to assume, Greg, that you're never going to respond to my email? |
| Queen Archivist 30.08.2006 22:30 |
TO PIERRE, WHO WROTE... Mr. Bad Guy (Bad Circulation) -- this is another "take" of the song, yes? NO. THIS WAS NOT COMPILED BY ANYONE FROM VARIOUS TAKES. THIS IS AN ACTUAL MIX (VERSION IS A BETTER DESCRIPTION, AS MIX IMPLIES WE MIXED IT) FROM THE 1985 ORIGINAL SESSIONS I FOUND ON A TAPE. IT IS VERY SIMILAR TO THE ONE WE PUT ON THE SOLO BOX. IT WASN'T WORTH PUTTING BOTH ON BECAUSE THEY ARE SO ALIKE - JUST LYRICAL DIFFERENCES MAINLY. I CHRISTENED IT 'BAD CIRCULATION' MIX AT THE TIME, 1999, JUST TO WRITE THAT ON THE DAT TAPE TO REMIND ME YEARS LATER WHAT IT WAS. NO OTHER REASON. AND THAT TITLE STUCK. IT'S NOT A NEW MIX. IT IS EXACTLY AS I FOUND IT. Re-built to be a complete song, kinda like one of the Freddie / Squier tracks off the box? If that's the case, where did you find it? Was it one of the pieces that there just wasn't room for in the original box? Mis-sorted in the Queen reels? IT WAS JUST ON ONE OF THE 'MADE IN HEAVEN' STEREO TAPES... PRIOR TO THE LP BEING CALLED MR BAD GUY. Found in a locked cupboard in a disused lavatory with a sign on the front that said "beware of the leopard?" Does this raise your hope at all for further (if extremely rare) "finds"? NO. WE KNOW EXACTLY WHAT IS ON EVERY TAPE NOW, QUEEN, FREDDIE, ETC. THERE WILL BE NO SURPRISES FOR US. BUT FOR YOU......... ???????????............ OH YES. SOME MASSIVE SURPRISES FOR THE FUTURE. I CAN SAY NO MORE. I DID A NICE LITTLE LYRIC COMPARISON THING BETWEEN THE VERSIONS OF THE MR BAD GUY TRACK, INCLUDING THIS NEW BAD CIRCULATION VERSION, WHICH I THINK YOU MIGHT FIND ON THE FM WEB SITE. QUITE INTERESTING TO VIEW ALL THE SUBTLE DIFFERENCES. GB |
| Queen Archivist 30.08.2006 22:35 |
Lester, If you want to send it again I will do my best to reply. There is a good reason I did not reply back then, which I won't go into here, but I might privately. Lets see how it goes. If you want to re-send, I will read it. OK? GB |
| Lester Burnham 30.08.2006 22:38 |
You said your email address has changed. I do not have your new one. Do you have mine? |
| Queen Archivist 30.08.2006 23:20 |
SEND TO THE OLD ONE. I'LL PICK IT UP. GB |
| Lester Burnham 30.08.2006 23:30 |
I've just sent it. |
| That guy who digs energy domes 30.08.2006 23:48 |
What is the old one Mr Brooks? |
| Jjeroen 31.08.2006 03:51 |
Greg, no I'm not asking you to list everything, but can you give us a slight insight in what is there in the archives. Eg; is it mostly demo versions of songs we already knnow, or are there also many 'new' songs, are there era's that have a lot left and/or era's that have nothing new... Just a little something for us to dream about! ;-) Btw: will you be playing Victory and some of those Fun in Space demo's at the Dutch convention? :-D Also: since now you, so I understand, have heard everything that is in the vaults - what is missing, as far as you know? What are you still looking for as to make the box-sets 'complete'? |
| Indo77 31.08.2006 18:10 |
Greg Does a full video exist of the June 7th Earl's Court concert? This would be great as part of a 70s boxset. |
| ern2150 02.09.2006 04:22 |
Queen Archivist wrote: TO PIERRE, WHO WROTE...Actually that was me, but Pierre had quoted it...anyway... IT WASN'T WORTH PUTTING BOTH ON BECAUSE THEY ARE SO ALIKE - JUST LYRICAL DIFFERENCES MAINLY. WE KNOW EXACTLY WHAT IS ON EVERY TAPE NOW, QUEEN, FREDDIE, ETC. THERE WILL BE NO SURPRISES FOR US. BUT FOR YOU......... ???????????............ OH YES. SOME MASSIVE SURPRISES FOR THE FUTURE. I CAN SAY NO MORE.I would love it if Bad Circulation shows up as an individually purchaseable track on 7digital or iTunes. If it doesn't, I'll be hopefully understandably wary of future one-off surprises if they show up on other "Greatest Hits" releases, like LOLSOS. But from what seems to be planned, I hope, Greg, that your hard work will facilitate larger groups of surprises in the future...looking forward to that. How does it feel to be "done" with that cataloguing? |
| TRS-Romania 30.09.2006 17:30 |
Greg has a problem which is: Dissocial-Narcistic-Paranoid- Antisocial Personality Disorder Personality disorder, usually coming to attention because of a gross disparity between behaviour and the prevailing social norms, and characterized by - very low tolerance to frustration and a low threshold for discharge of aggression - callous unconcern for the feelings of others - gross and persistent attitude of irresponsi- bility and disregard for social norms, rules and obligations - persistently bears grudges, i.e., is unforgiving of insults, injuries, or slights - perceives attacks on his or her character and is quick to react angrily or to counterattack - displays rapidly shifting and shallow expression of emotions - shows self-dramatization, theatricality, and exaggerated _expression of emotion - shows arrogant, haughty behaviors or attitudes - markedly dysharmonious attitudes and behaviour, involving usually several areas of functioning, e.g. affectivity, arousal, impulse control, ways of perceiving and thinking, and style of relating to others |
| TheGame 30.09.2006 22:06 |
TRS-Romania wrote: Greg has a problem which is: Dissocial-Narcistic-Paranoid- Antisocial Personality Disorder Personality disorder, usually coming to attention because of a gross disparity between behaviour and the prevailing social norms, and characterized by - very low tolerance to frustration and a low threshold for discharge of aggression - callous unconcern for the feelings of others - gross and persistent attitude of irresponsi- bility and disregard for social norms, rules and obligations - persistently bears grudges, i.e., is unforgiving of insults, injuries, or slights - perceives attacks on his or her character and is quick to react angrily or to counterattack - displays rapidly shifting and shallow expression of emotions - shows self-dramatization, theatricality, and exaggerated _expression of emotion - shows arrogant, haughty behaviors or attitudes - markedly dysharmonious attitudes and behaviour, involving usually several areas of functioning, e.g. affectivity, arousal, impulse control, ways of perceiving and thinking, and style of relating to othersBoring! |