QueenZone discussion #397357
Do you think.....
| muttley15 28.09.2004 17:26 |
....that Brian and Roger should re-brand themselves as Taylor May'd and DO SOME NEW (LIVE) STUFF???? |
| LiveAidQueen 28.09.2004 18:51 |
No. |
| Brimon 28.09.2004 18:57 |
Yes. |
| Gunpowder Gelatine 28.09.2004 18:59 |
I don't care what they call themselves, just go and play live! |
| deleted user 28.09.2004 19:07 |
Gunpowder Gelatine wrote: I don't care what they call themselves, just go and play live!I agree |
| Brian_Mays_Wig 28.09.2004 19:34 |
Brian May And Roger Taylor of Queen. NOT QUEEN! |
| deleted user 28.09.2004 21:27 |
Brian_Mays_Wig wrote: Brian May And Roger Taylor of Queen. NOT QUEEN!Emphasis on the OF. Not BM & RT, Queen. Emphasis! |
| MetzgerR 28.09.2004 22:02 |
I don't know that they should call themselves Queen, as I truly consider Queen to be all four artists, but I would be lying if I said I wouldn't give anything to hear them live! And, regardless of what they called themselves, I would do virtually anything to hear them... I wish so badly I'd been born a little (okay, maybe a lot) earlier, and had been given the chance to actually see Queen... But, I can always hope that one day I'll be able to at least see the remnants, ne? Ja ne! |
| high-flying-adored 28.09.2004 22:07 |
donbosco_03 wrote:Serious emphasis. They aren't Queen by themselves. And the Taylor May'd is cute. :)Brian_Mays_Wig wrote: Brian May And Roger Taylor of Queen. NOT QUEEN!Emphasis on the OF. Not BM & RT, Queen. Emphasis! |
| BackToHuman 28.09.2004 22:54 |
i could be wrong, but i was thinking there's a tribute band by the name of Taylor May'd. so, ironically enough, Roger and Brian might have to jump through some legal hoops if they wanted to use that. |
| Daburcor? 29.09.2004 01:19 |
I say Brian drops ol' Roger and goes solo again. Nothing against Roger mind you, I would just like another solo album from Brian. Roger can make one too I guess... ;) |
| Regor 29.09.2004 05:14 |
One last tour, but definitely not as Queen, "BM and RT invite you to a night at the opera" or something like that (like the tour programms for the ANATO-Tour) and then that's it. So the legions of "new" fans from after '91 can enjoy Queen-Music live (or those who have missed them live, like myself :-( ) and then the very well deserved retirement... I also like Pink Floyd a lot, and having seen Dave Gilmour in a documentary recently I think it's not always too pleasant to see your idols aging... ;-) |
| Giacco 73 29.09.2004 05:37 |
I saw Brian and Roger play live last year in Modena,Italy,for the Pavarotti & friends.My dream came true,best emotions from a concert in my life.And I want to live that feeling again,for sure!In every form they want to perform under every denomination with whoever they want,just play live and give to the world the best songs in rock'n'roll history over and over again! |
| KillerQueen840 29.09.2004 06:47 |
I don't really care for the name but I definately want to see them get together to do some live stuff! |
| Roger_in_Tigerskin_Trousers 29.09.2004 09:18 |
NO! |
| Brianmay1975 29.09.2004 12:22 |
Yes. No matter their name... |
| Ms. Bea Haven 29.09.2004 13:00 |
Yep - definitely - write some new material and take the show on the road! Taylor May'd works as a marketing tool, but they'd still have to rely on the Queen name in some shape or fashion - especially here in the U.S. Unlike everywhere else in the world, they aren't household names here (but they are in my house ;o) |
| deleted user 29.09.2004 13:42 |
What about... May, Taylor and Friends! Sounds tacky! |
| Green Banana 29.09.2004 14:45 |
I googled Taylor May'd and came up with a load of porn sites and something about a drag queen... But yes, it would be very cool if they toured, seeing as I was a tad too young - or perhaps not even born when Queen were touring. |
| deleted user 30.09.2004 00:42 |
How old are they, anyway? I read somewhere that whenever good old Roger played drums, after an hour or so, his arms would cramp, and would require a nap. :) |
| not very important person 30.09.2004 07:38 |
Roger_in_Tigerskin_Trousers wrote: NO!Well I DO! |
| Brianmay1975 30.09.2004 11:20 |
donbosco_03 wrote: How old are they, anyway? I read somewhere that whenever good old Roger played drums, after an hour or so, his arms would cramp, and would require a nap. :)Brian - 57 and Roger - 55. Not so old, are they? In Rog's case, it's perhaps the vodka abuse that does him wrong... |
| deleted user 30.09.2004 13:44 |
Roger would sometimes look like a vagabond when stubbly. |
| don't_stop_me_now 9697 30.09.2004 14:52 |
Yes, of course |
| BrianRules 30.09.2004 15:32 |
I've already said in other posts that I'd love to see them tour again. I think they'd have to use the Queen name to draw an audience and to let the public know what they're about. Obviously, those two alone are not Queen, but they could be billed "The Music Of Queen, Featuring Brian And Roger", or something like that. |
| Timo 30.09.2004 18:00 |
Yes of course! But why is no one talking about John joining them? |
| love of my life 14018 30.09.2004 18:10 |
^^^ Because they would really have to twist his arm, and, well, it's not going to happen. Hell, Queen isn't even a household name here anymore. Except in my head, I guess. |
| John S Stuart 30.09.2004 18:39 |
"Do you think....." Not as often as I should have... |
| Bob The Shrek 30.09.2004 18:44 |
It really doesn't matter what they call themselves - be it Queen or Deaky's Left Bollock, people are going to go watch the shows. Mind you, I wouldn't consider the name Deaky's Left Bollock if they do an album. |
| deleted user 30.09.2004 18:50 |
yeah, maybe Jimmy Page and Robert Plant should imitate Taylor May'd with Planting Pages! HAHAH! |