tay120 06.08.2009 17:51 |
Is it just me or does Brian May seem overly obsessed with songwriting credits. For instance, he made a big deal about how he played for like 2 seconds at the beginning of one of the songs in "Chinese Democracy" and then didn't get credited. WHen someone once pointed out that Freddie was instructing him on his guitar playing during the making of "One Vision" he also got really defensive. Other times, it appears that he invents contributions that don't even exist. For instance, he made a big deal about how, during the line "shiver down my spine" in "Bohemian Rhapsody" he apparently added some special noise with his guitar. In fact, it turns out that this "special sound" was made by a percussion instrument called a bell tree and not by his guitar at all! |
i-Fred 06.08.2009 20:09 |
he has allot of passion within his work, and maybe on a day to basis people get thigns wrong and it's just tipped him of over the edge. Look at how many fans have bashed Axle over not putting brian on the record.... now, if fan's are doin that, Imagin how Brian must feel... |
marcio17@queenzone.com 06.08.2009 21:12 |
I think he only needee to explian this isuuses. Nothing else. By the way, remember the credit thing during Miracle/Innuendo sessions. So, no way of thinking of him as you put it. |
The Real Wizard 06.08.2009 21:17 |
tay120 wrote: WHen someone once pointed out that Freddie was instructing him on his guitar playing during the making of "One Vision" he also got really defensive....which is exactly why cameras should never be in the studio when a band is recording. You won't believe how many people have used that one single video as "proof" that Freddie controlled the band's songwriting throughout their entire career. The song was a band collaboration, so they were helping each other out. Sometimes they argue over things. A few years earlier, Brian wanted a guitar solo on Back Chat, much to John's dismay since it was his song, but he got his wish in the end. Arguments lead to compromises. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose. It's how a band works. If Roger wants credit for These Are The Days Of Our Lives, then he can do what he needs to do to make that happen. But if he doesn't, his absence of action doesn't suddenly translate to "Brian is looking for the limelight" if he does make a move for one of his songs. As far as I'm concerned, Brian is the most humble guy in the business, never wanting more than 25% of the credit when it comes to his band. For instance, he made a big deal about how, during the line "shiver down my spine" in "Bohemian Rhapsody" he apparently added some special noise with his guitar. In fact, it turns out that this "special sound" was made by a percussion instrument called a bell tree and not by his guitar at all! Where'd you hear that? As far as I know it was the strings being played to the right of the bridge. |
Sebastian 06.08.2009 21:18 |
By the way, remember the credit thing during Miracle/Innuendo sessions. So, no way of thinking of him as you put it. If so... why is now IWIA credited to 'May' only, and The Miracle and Invisible Man are still 'Queen'? Why was Mother Love 'May/Mercury' and Winter's Tale remained 'Queen'? BTW, Bri didn't say he invented the 'shivers' effect, he said he played it, and it is true: the sound comes from guitar and not a bell-tree. |
Ken8 06.08.2009 21:39 |
Sir GH wrote:You won't believe how many people have used that one single video as "proof" that Freddie controlled the band's songwriting throughout their entire career. The song was a band collaboration, so they were helping each other out....... Except that Roger Taylor himself admitted in a TV interview about "One Vision" that the "rotter" Freddie "changed his song" ....also see the quote from John IIRC suggesting that they went with whoever had a strong idea, and Freddie had most of the strong ideas. ...also note their lack of success in coming up with anything that amounts to anything much since his demise.... |
The Real Wizard 06.08.2009 21:46 |
Ken8 wrote: also see the quote from John IIRC suggesting that they went with whoever had a strong idea, and Freddie had most of the strong ideas.Of course... nobody's denying that Freddie was a major creative force in the band. But it certainly wasn't always his desires that were met. ...also note their lack of success in coming up with anything that amounts to anything much since his demise.... Fair enough. But also note the Mr. Bad Guy album... it was Freddie without Queen, and it showed, often painfully. They were a band of 4 very different individuals who were very good each in their own right, but an excellent, world-class combination when put together. It's just publicly misunderstood that Freddie was at the helm of everything with the final word when that certainly wasn't the case. |
john bodega 07.08.2009 00:55 |
Ridiculous thread assertion. Y'know if Brian were in a band full of people who were actually aggressive over songwriting credit, he'd probably look conservative. As it happens he had the bad fortune of picking a band that probably didn't mind sharing. |
john bodega 07.08.2009 00:57 |
tay120 wrote: In fact, it turns out that this "special sound" was made by a percussion instrument called a bell tree and not by his guitar at all!I don't suppose there's a retraction to this statement on the way? |
Togg 07.08.2009 05:25 |
I'm not sure 'big deal' would be the way I would describe any of those instances. BTW the 'Special sound' WAS the guitar One Vision video is just the way bands work in studios, and I have know doubt they each instructed each other on how to perform a part from time to time. Brian just happens to comment more than the others about stuff, one thing I am sure about is that if Roger had a soapbox he would be far more vocal about his contributions than Brian ever will be. |
dragon-fly 07.08.2009 07:25 |
There's no reason to say that about Brian. He's very hard-working person, and it's clear that he wants to tell about his achievments and contributions. Which is very normal. Everybody likes to talk about what he/she managed to achieve, especially when it took lots of time and skills. About "Chinese Democracy"- Brian spent lots of time to help Axl with the album. Even if not much appeared there, he still did work on it. |
YourValentine 07.08.2009 07:42 |
Brian did not make a "big deal" about the Axl record at all. He only responded to it when people wrote to his soap box about it. You can read his comments here link It's ridiculous to say he made a "big deal" about his missing songwriter credits when in fact he was very kind and generous and "totally relaxed" about the issue. You should check the facts before spreading such lies about Brian. |
demonwolf 07.08.2009 08:44 |
i sent an email to brian about him being left off chinese democracy, and he was not disappointed at all. it is all on his website. |
bhm0129ad 07.08.2009 09:44 |
tay120 wrote: Is it just me or does Brian May seem overly obsessed with songwriting credits. For instance, he made a big deal about how he played for like 2 seconds at the beginning of one of the songs in "Chinese Democracy" and then didn't get credited. WHen someone once pointed out that Freddie was instructing him on his guitar playing during the making of "One Vision" he also got really defensive. Other times, it appears that he invents contributions that don't even exist. For instance, he made a big deal about how, during the line "shiver down my spine" in "Bohemian Rhapsody" he apparently added some special noise with his guitar. In fact, it turns out that this "special sound" was made by a percussion instrument called a bell tree and not by his guitar at all! Classic 'first' post. I guess it IS just you after all. |
August R. 07.08.2009 16:21 |
Sebastian wrote: If so... why is now IWIA credited to 'May' only, and The Miracle and Invisible Man are still 'Queen'? I don't have all their latter compilantions, but at least on Queen Rocks and Return of The Champions IWIA was credited to the whole band. On what releases it's been credited to May only? (I'm just curious.) |
Simon says87 07.08.2009 16:40 |
Brian is not playing on Chinese Democracy, He just recorded with Axl, and it was left out.. I Want It All is credited as a May song on Greatest Video Hits 2.. |
mike hunt 07.08.2009 17:14 |
who cares about all this. IMO, Innuendo should be credited to Freddie and roger since they wrote the song. Slighty mad was a freddie song and should get the credit, so why shouldn't brian get credit for I want it all. It was his song. |
lalaalalaa 07.08.2009 20:19 |
I wish they didn't do that whole credit every song as Queen thing because I like to see which member(s) wrote which songs. |
Ken8 07.08.2009 23:43 |
Sir GH wrote:Ken8 wrote: also see the quote from John IIRC suggesting that they went with whoever had a strong idea, and Freddie had most of the strong ideas.Of course... nobody's denying that Freddie was a major creative force in the band. But it certainly wasn't always his desires that were met....also note their lack of success in coming up with anything that amounts to anything much since his demise....Fair enough. But also note the Mr. Bad Guy album... it was Freddie without Queen, and it showed, often painfully. They were a band of 4 very different individuals who were very good each in their own right, but an excellent, world-class combination when put together. It's just publicly misunderstood that Freddie was at the helm of everything with the final word when that certainly wasn't the case. Yes, and funnily enough Fred was usually the first to say so. There's been a lot said since his demise though despite their inability to prove themselves without him. I like how "Mr Bad Guy" is trotted out as some sort of disaster. And how the success of "Barcelona" and "Great Pretender" are conveniently overlooked, along with just about any posthumous Freddie release, Queen or solo. As much as I love "Queen" I can also see the loss of Mercury as THE worst thing that could've happened. As much as I hate to say it, creatively the band would've overcome the loss of any other member with more success and credibility. |
magicalfreddiemercury 08.08.2009 09:39 |
Ken8 wrote: As much as I love "Queen" I can also see the loss of Mercury as THE worst thing that could've happened. As much as I hate to say it, creatively the band would've overcome the loss of any other member with more success and credibility. |
Bohardy 08.08.2009 10:03 |
The whole 'special sound' in Bo Rhap thing must surely have come about because the Off The Record score-book for Greatest Hits says that sound is made by a bell tree. Of course, the compilers of those books make educated guesses as to how the sounds they are transcribing are made. Brian meanwhile produced the sound in question, and so does not need to make an educated guess when telling us how the sound was made. |
Holly2003 08.08.2009 10:37 |
The reason why song writing credits is important -- and why changing them much afterwards is a dubious practice -- is because Fred isn't around any more to dispute what's goin on. They agreed, at one point, to share songwriting credits as 'Queen' instead of individually, and that's the way it should stay. Brian was happy enough to do that when the decision was made so what's changed in the meantime? Claiming songs now leaves him open to all sorts of bad interpretations. It's one thing for Brian to say that he wrote IWIA, for example -- I don't think anyone would have a problem with that -- it's another thing entirely to 'officially' change songwriting credits on album covers. |
bhm0129ad 08.08.2009 11:43 |
Perhaps it is all just to do with money. The decision to share the credits was possibly a way of sharing the royalties equally, thus ending Queen's notorious arguments about who earns what. After Freddie died and John quit PERHAPS Brian is sick of 'his' money going to a dead man's estate (run by a woman who has pissed on Freddie's memory and wishes in many ways) and to a Bassman who clearly has no positive feelings towards his 'brothers' of twenty years. I am only speculating of course. On the other hand, as has been said, Brian has every right to say if HE wrote this or that song, as does Roger or any other artist for that matter. |
Holly2003 08.08.2009 13:01 |
bhm0129ad wrote: Perhaps it is all just to do with money. The decision to share the credits was possibly a way of sharing the royalties equally, thus ending Queen's notorious arguments about who earns what. After Freddie died and John quit PERHAPS Brian is sick of 'his' money going to a dead man's estate (run by a woman who has pissed on Freddie's memory and wishes in many ways) and to a Bassman who clearly has no positive feelings towards his 'brothers' of twenty years. I am only speculating of course. On the other hand, as has been said, Brian has every right to say if HE wrote this or that song, as does Roger or any other artist for that matter. If I had to speculate I would say you're wrong about that, I would guess it's more to do with Brian thinking the song is his and wanting some recognition of that. Legally, I would guess he's on very dodgy ground. |
Sebastian 08.08.2009 13:56 |
bhm0129ad wrote: Perhaps it is all just to do with money. The decision to share the credits was possibly a way of sharing the royalties equally, thus ending Queen's notorious arguments about who earns what. After Freddie died and John quit PERHAPS Brian is sick of 'his' money going to a dead man's estate (run by a woman who has pissed on Freddie's memory and wishes in many ways) and to a Bassman who clearly has no positive feelings towards his 'brothers' of twenty years. I am only speculating of course. On the other hand, as has been said, Brian has every right to say if HE wrote this or that song, as does Roger or any other artist for that matter. If so, then he should stop receiving money for The Miracle, and let the 'woman who has pissed on F's memory and wishes' have it. It was his (F's) song, after all. |
YourValentine 08.08.2009 14:32 |
Holly2003 wrote: The reason why song writing credits is important -- and why changing them much afterwards is a dubious practice -- is because Fred isn't around any more to dispute what's goin on. They agreed, at one point, to share songwriting credits as 'Queen' instead of individually, and that's the way it should stay. Brian was happy enough to do that when the decision was made so what's changed in the meantime? Claiming songs now leaves him open to all sorts of bad interpretations. It's one thing for Brian to say that he wrote IWIA, for example -- I don't think anyone would have a problem with that -- it's another thing entirely to 'officially' change songwriting credits on album covers. I agree that it looks bad when IWIA is suddenly credited to Brian on album covers. I do not believe it has any legal benefit for Brian (getting paid more royalties) because the legal songwriters are still all 4 members according to EMI publishing http://www.emimusicpub.com/worldwide/servlet/songResults I think it's probably very hard if not impossible to legally change the songwriting credits after 20 years, so it's just "cosmetics" when Brian is listed as the creator of IWIA on an album cover. @ bhm0129ad : Freddie's estate is "run" by Jim Beach and John Libson, Freddie's manager and lawyer - not a woman who "pisses on his wishes" - I wonder where you get that from. |
bhm0129ad 08.08.2009 15:51 |
Ok, maybe his 'estate' is managed by them, but my reference was to Mary Austin. I don't know who gets the ongoing royalties from Fred's songs, but she is certainly not the best recipient after some of the things I have heard she has done since his passing. To all: NOTE that in my post I CLEARLY stated the words PERHAPS etc. meaning I am NOT claiming to know all, I am merely speculating. |
Oberon 08.08.2009 18:49 |
I think it's difficult after all this time with credits etc. Also, Gh2 was done after Freds' death wasn't it, and maybe there were people compling the sleeve notes who knew Bri wrote IWIA and made a mistake? Why didn't they credit other songs (Roger's) as being other then Queen? Maybe because Brian seems the one who puts the most personal effort into it. Or maybe I'm wrong, and Brian wanted some recognition. But, should we really get too upset about it? The music is the same after all. As for the impact of Fred's death, well yes, it was huge. I think while the four of them could work together, it was magic. Not everying (Hot Space etc), but generally, all four worked well and made good music, as they all acknowledged. But, I feel that if any of the four had died, the effect would have been almost as devastating. I say almost because I think if John had quit or been lost, I think the other three would have still created good music (but I think it would still be missing something). If Roger had gone, I think a further element would have been lost. If Brian had been lost, I think it would be as bad as when we lost Fred. You just can't have Queen without Brian's guitar. If Fred had lived, and all four continued, I think they'd still be doing good stuff. If they'd disbanded, I think Fred could have done good stuff musically, but I don't think it would/ could have been good in the rock area. Maybe more Barcelona type stuff, but not rock/pop type stuff. Mr Bad Guy is ok, but not much better or worse then TCR. In fact I think I prefer TCR. My point being that Fred was a great singer songwriter and musician, but I really don't think he'd be the legend he is if he hadn't met 3 guys and made a band called Queen. It just wouldn't have happened for him. I really believe that, and that's why I really think you can't dispel the input of John, Roger and particularly Brian. |
Sebastian 08.08.2009 20:51 |
Brian's input isn't bigger than Roger's or John's. Eddie Howell + Brian + Fred was not Queen + Eddie Howell Brian + Fred playing World at Live Aid were 'Freddie Mercury and Brian May', not 'Queen' No John --> No Queen No Roger --> No Queen No Brian --> No Queen No Freddie --> No Queen |
its_a_hard_life 26994 08.08.2009 21:09 |
DENIED. |
mike hunt 08.08.2009 23:53 |
Ken8 wrote:Sir GH wrote:Yes, and funnily enough Fred was usually the first to say so. There's been a lot said since his demise though despite their inability to prove themselves without him. I like how "Mr Bad Guy" is trotted out as some sort of disaster. And how the success of "Barcelona" and "Great Pretender" are conveniently overlooked, along with just about any posthumous Freddie release, Queen or solo. As much as I love "Queen" I can also see the loss of Mercury as THE worst thing that could've happened. As much as I hate to say it, creatively the band would've overcome the loss of any other member with more success and credibility.Ken8 wrote: also see the quote from John IIRC suggesting that they went with whoever had a strong idea, and Freddie had most of the strong ideas.Of course... nobody's denying that Freddie was a major creative force in the band. But it certainly wasn't always his desires that were met....also note their lack of success in coming up with anything that amounts to anything much since his demise....Fair enough. But also note the Mr. Bad Guy album... it was Freddie without Queen, and it showed, often painfully. They were a band of 4 very different individuals who were very good each in their own right, but an excellent, world-class combination when put together. It's just publicly misunderstood that Freddie was at the helm of everything with the final word when that certainly wasn't the case. ken, we think a like. also, I think a lot of negative posts about freddie on this site is simply out of Jelously. That maybe brian or roger is a person's favorite member and they feel like they don't get enough respect. I agree about Mr. Bad, these people somehow forget the genious of Bracelona and the great pretender. |
Ken8 09.08.2009 01:42 |
bhm0129ad wrote: After Freddie died and John quit PERHAPS Brian is sick of 'his' money going to a dead man's estate (run by a woman who has pissed on Freddie's memory and wishes in many ways) and to a Bassman who clearly has no positive feelings towards his 'brothers' of twenty years. I am only speculating of course. I hope so, because your suggestion makes Brian out to be a COMPLETE asshole. There's been far too much rewriting of history as it is lately. |
mike hunt 09.08.2009 01:45 |
people write a lot of negavity about freddie on this site, but it's not much better for brian. Brian an asshole?....come on now, the man is a sweet heart. |
Ken8 09.08.2009 01:45 |
Holly2003 wrote: The reason why song writing credits is important -- and why changing them much afterwards is a dubious practice -- is because Fred isn't around any more to dispute what's goin on. They agreed, at one point, to share songwriting credits as 'Queen' instead of individually, and that's the way it should stay. Quoted for truth. Couldn't agree more, and displays exactly how some of "Queen"s actions post 1991 have been dubious and puts them in a bad light. |
mike hunt 09.08.2009 01:53 |
a bad light to who?....we all know Queen went to shit after freddie died, but know cares about all this other stuff like writing credits and all that. Only a few die hard fans care about that. People who need to get a life. |
Ken8 09.08.2009 02:08 |
Oberon wrote: My point being that Fred was a great singer songwriter and musician, but I really don't think he'd be the legend he is if he hadn't met 3 guys and made a band called Queen. It just wouldn't have happened for him. I really believe that, and that's why I really think you can't dispel the input of John, Roger and particularly Brian. Amazing...... That's overlooking the talent of Freddie Mercury and his absolute drive, determination and discipline to become a star. The other members of Queen are on record for saying the same thing, and numerous others. I'm not sure of your age but never, ever forget that had the other three not embraced Mercury's plan to conquer the world we wouldn't be here today posting about them. Again, they said so themselves. I can see your point, but to be honest I think Fred still would've emerged as a "legend" with four different, but very confident musicians around him. It wouldn't have been Queen as we know them, but I'm sure it would've amounted to something. Why is it so hard for some Queen "fans" to believe Freddie Mercury REALLY was that great?? I think it's fair to say that a couple of remaining members may be struggling to a degree with living in his shadow all these years later. Sadly they're learning the hard way and in full view of the public what some of us knew all along, there is no Queen without him. ....and not respecting decisions made back when Queen were a four piece (eg writing credits) is poor form and leaves a bad taste in my mouth |
Ken8 09.08.2009 02:10 |
mike hunt wrote: a bad light to who?....we all know Queen went to shit after freddie died, but know cares about all this other stuff like writing credits and all that. Only a few die hard fans care about that. People who need to get a life. Give me a break. It's called respect for a much missed member of the band. It's called principle. Grown up stuff. |
mike hunt 09.08.2009 02:16 |
Ken8 wrote:mike hunt wrote: a bad light to who?....we all know Queen went to shit after freddie died, but know cares about all this other stuff like writing credits and all that. Only a few die hard fans care about that. People who need to get a life.Give me a break. It's called respect for a much missed member of the band. It's called principle. Grown up stuff. Actually, I'm agreeing with everything you said. Right on target with everything. It's amazing to read these posts on queenzone, it's like they make up their own shit. They forget freddie mercury was the true star of queen, that's who everyone wants to talk about in the music world. it's obvious, look at the mess Queen became after freddie died. that's all the proof you need. |
Ken8 09.08.2009 02:17 |
Sorry Mike, I didn't get your sarcasm! |
Ken8 09.08.2009 02:21 |
...and Mike, again as much as I hate to say it, the reality is had Brian May passed away in 1991, there wouldn't have been a sell out "Brian May Tribute Concert" at Wembley seen by billions around the world, no matter how great a tragedy it would've been. |
dragon-fly 09.08.2009 03:56 |
The reason of Queen's success is because all four were equally talented but also gifted in diffrent areas. Because one person can't do everything, and that's perfect ballance- the four people, neither more nor less, just exactly enough to share the duties of the band. Each of them filled the gaps in this machine, but not just "somehow"- with highest quality. And the result of what these people have done- is Queen. The solo projects showed very well that- J. Deacon, B. May, F. Mercury and R. Taylor- match perfectly in one band. |
bhm0129ad 09.08.2009 04:04 |
Ken8 wrote:bhm0129ad wrote: After Freddie died and John quit PERHAPS Brian is sick of 'his' money going to a dead man's estate (run by a woman who has pissed on Freddie's memory and wishes in many ways) and to a Bassman who clearly has no positive feelings towards his 'brothers' of twenty years. I am only speculating of course.I hope so, because your suggestion makes Brian out to be a COMPLETE asshole. There's been far too much rewriting of history as it is lately. If you must know, I am more of a fan of Brian than Freddie so YOU may think my comments make him look like an asshole, but I (as the poster of the remark) certainly did not see or mean it that way. I was merely pointing ouit what is called a POSSIBILITY - one amongst many others being posted here. I think the OP makes brian out to look like an asshole too but there you go. |
Ken8 09.08.2009 05:05 |
bhm0129ad wrote:Ken8 wrote:If you must know, I am more of a fan of Brian than Freddie so YOU may think my comments make him look like an asshole, but I (as the poster of the remark) certainly did not see or mean it that way. I was merely pointing ouit what is called a POSSIBILITY - one amongst many others being posted here. I think the OP makes brian out to look like an asshole too but there you go.bhm0129ad wrote: After Freddie died and John quit PERHAPS Brian is sick of 'his' money going to a dead man's estate (run by a woman who has pissed on Freddie's memory and wishes in many ways) and to a Bassman who clearly has no positive feelings towards his 'brothers' of twenty years. I am only speculating of course.I hope so, because your suggestion makes Brian out to be a COMPLETE asshole. There's been far too much rewriting of history as it is lately. Sheesh. You're more a fan of Brian? No shit? You said it was speculation on your part, and I said I hope so. Get it? And sorry but if there was any truth in what you call a POSSIBILITY, then it makes Brian out to be an asshole. And that's why I said I hope it was speculation. Yeah, you're a real great fan of Brian May. I wouldn't even entertain the POSSIBILITY that May would change writing credits for the reason you've speculated. Get it yet? |
mike hunt 09.08.2009 05:11 |
Ken8 wrote: ...and Mike, again as much as I hate to say it, the reality is had Brian May passed away in 1991, there wouldn't have been a sell out "Brian May Tribute Concert" at Wembley seen by billions around the world, no matter how great a tragedy it would've been. I love brian may, so I don't want to come across as negative brian, but the people on this site are in denial big time. Queenzone does seem like a brian may site to me. How can you forget what bo rhap or live aid (freddie's performance of course) meant to that band?....Brian was very Important to the sound Of Queen, but no one was as Important as Mr. Mercury. The tribute concert was of course another example. Some people are in denial. |
john bodega 09.08.2009 05:41 |
I don't follow this thread at all. Acknowledging Brian's importance to the band is not a slight on Freddie's significance... As for the songwriting credit thing, I don't think it even matters. Technically the money still goes to the same people (maybe I'm wrong) ... besides which, when I heard "I Want It All" the first time, I said 'ooh a Brian song'. Who didn't? Brian declaring what we all knew already isn't a big deal. |
mike hunt 09.08.2009 05:49 |
True, it's not a big deal if he's also gonna change the credit of Innuendo to freddie and roger, and slightly mad to freddie. See the point? |
john bodega 09.08.2009 06:14 |
But isn't that decision up to Roger and whoever it is that speaks for Freddie these days? Not that I have even the foggiest clue whether there'd be a legal barrier stopping Brian from doing such a thing. Surely it'd be up to someone else? Besides which, Innuendo is a poor example. "I Want It All" was basically a finished song. "Innuendo" was completed as a group - true, there are other examples which are more Freddie-based and are still credited to the group, but I thought I'd just point that out. |
Ken8 09.08.2009 08:50 |
|
Ken8 09.08.2009 08:53 |
Ken8 wrote:Zebonka12 wrote: But isn't that decision up to Roger and whoever it is that speaks for Freddie these days?Not that I have even the foggiest clue whether there'd be a legal barrier stopping Brian from doing such a thing. Surely it'd be up to someone else? Besides which, Innuendo is a poor example. "I Want It All" was basically a finished song. "Innuendo" was completed as a group - true, there are other examples which are more Freddie-based and are still credited to the group, but I thought I'd just point that out. Yep. It's more a matter of principle, I think. Look at "The Miracle" EPK and it's interviews. The band's decision to credit all songs as composed by "Queen" was then heralded by all members as the greatest thing since sliced bread. Why after all these years change that? Especially since the passing of the bands key member? |
Ken8 09.08.2009 09:30 |
Zebonka12 wrote: I don't follow this thread at all. Acknowledging Brian's importance to the band is not a slight on Freddie's significance... Of course not. The thing is, as great as Brian May is (and he is f*cking great, and a genius) he happened to be in a band with Freddie Mercury, know what I mean? Someone who is a member of the "unique and elite", the likes of which we will never see again. It doesn't detract from Brian's talent, and his influence on rock music one iota. Don't worry, as great I'm saying Fred was, nobody is going to forget Brian May anytime soon either. |
john bodega 09.08.2009 10:41 |
My way of thinking is that if there's no money in it, that he probably just had a bizarre, very-human moment where he felt like a bit of recognition. That's purely speculative of course. Much as I felt with the "should Q+PR be called Queen+Paul Rodgers" discussion, I'm not so bothered by the name anyway. I feel like a bad fan for saying it of course, but I don't really care for much other than the music. I don't concern myself with the idea of them 'disrespecting' each other or whatever... I just like the music, which is probably why I have no hope of contributing to a topic like this. I have to return to what the original poster said though and repeat: I don't think Brian's overly aggressive at all. Roger Waters and the rest of Pink Floyd going to court? THAT is aggressive, although if it were to stop "Momentary Lapse in Reason" from being released then maybe I'd do the same thing. It's no biggie, honestly ... we all basically know who wrote what, and which ones were team efforts. |
Sebastian 09.08.2009 13:37 |
Some people don't care about the name, and they're entitled not to - they're not harming anybody by not caring. Some people do care about the name, and we're entitled to - we're not harming anybody by caring. Some people don't care about credits and if they changed or not, and they're entitled to - they're not hurting anyone by not caring. Some people do care about credits and if they're changed or not, and we're entitled to - we're not hurting anyone by caring. For some people, these sorts of discussions are pointless, and they're entitled to - they're not hurting anybody by thinking they're pointless. For some people, these sorts of discussions aren't pointless, and we're entitled to - we're not hurting anybody by thinking they're not pointless. |
john bodega 09.08.2009 14:30 |
Put that in 7/8 and you have a concept album. |
bhm0129ad 09.08.2009 16:12 |
Ken8 wrote:bhm0129ad wrote:Sheesh. You're more a fan of Brian? No shit? You said it was speculation on your part, and I said I hope so. Get it? And sorry but if there was any truth in what you call a POSSIBILITY, then it makes Brian out to be an asshole. And that's why I said I hope it was speculation. Yeah, you're a real great fan of Brian May. I wouldn't even entertain the POSSIBILITY that May would change writing credits for the reason you've speculated. Get it yet?Ken8 wrote:If you must know, I am more of a fan of Brian than Freddie so YOU may think my comments make him look like an asshole, but I (as the poster of the remark) certainly did not see or mean it that way. I was merely pointing ouit what is called a POSSIBILITY - one amongst many others being posted here. I think the OP makes brian out to look like an asshole too but there you go.bhm0129ad wrote: After Freddie died and John quit PERHAPS Brian is sick of 'his' money going to a dead man's estate (run by a woman who has pissed on Freddie's memory and wishes in many ways) and to a Bassman who clearly has no positive feelings towards his 'brothers' of twenty years. I am only speculating of course.I hope so, because your suggestion makes Brian out to be a COMPLETE asshole. There's been far too much rewriting of history as it is lately. You would not entertain such thoughts cos you are blind enough to think that just because they are great musicians that that makes them infallible .. GET IT? "Ooh, Brian, Roger , John and Freddie simply MUST have been absolutely wonderful and amazing and PERFECT human beings who could NEVER EVER have a any negative thoughts whatsoever.." GET REAL. I 'GOT' what you said in the first place numpty. |
Ken8 09.08.2009 21:39 |
bhm0129ad wrote: You would not entertain such thoughts cos you are blind enough to think that just because they are great musicians that that makes them infallible .. GET IT? "Ooh, Brian, Roger , John and Freddie simply MUST have been absolutely wonderful and amazing and PERFECT human beings who could NEVER EVER have a any negative thoughts whatsoever.." GET REAL. I 'GOT' what you said in the first place numpty. LOL!!! Talk about being totally clueless! It may be said that May & Taylor have made some dubious decisions of late. The difference is I don't believe that May would sink to the level YOU think he could. ....and you're his big fan apparently. It's just too funny for words What an idiot. Brian May must be proud to have fans like you. |
Ken8 09.08.2009 21:42 |
Zebonka12 wrote: My way of thinking is that if there's no money in it, that he probably just had a bizarre, very-human moment where he felt like a bit of recognition. That's purely speculative of course. ...and probably a lot closer to the truth than any idiotic "possibility" that he acted to deny royalties to a former band mate and a benefactor of Mercury's will. |
bhm0129ad 09.08.2009 23:53 |
Ken8 wrote:bhm0129ad wrote: You would not entertain such thoughts cos you are blind enough to think that just because they are great musicians that that makes them infallible .. GET IT? "Ooh, Brian, Roger , John and Freddie simply MUST have been absolutely wonderful and amazing and PERFECT human beings who could NEVER EVER have a any negative thoughts whatsoever.." GET REAL. I 'GOT' what you said in the first place numpty.LOL!!! Talk about being totally clueless! It may be said that May & Taylor have made some dubious decisions of late. The difference is I don't believe that May would sink to the level YOU think he could. ....and you're his big fan apparently. It's just too funny for words What an idiot. Brian May must be proud to have fans like you. You really are a twit aren't you. Does it make you feel all big ridiculing other people like that, little boy? Save you stupid remarks for someone else or grow up. It is one thing to disagree, fine of course, but to try to belittle someone the way you are shows that you really have seruious self-esteem issues and come to places like this for your pethetic self-induced ego-boosts. I fart in your general direction LMFAO |
Ken8 10.08.2009 01:25 |
LOL! That's a very well thought out and literate response. Buddy, you brought it on yourself. Are you legally bound to keep displaying your lack of intelligence by posting here or something? Your original suggestion (or POSSIBILITY) was outright laughable, and an insult to Brian May. It needed to be addressed. Just let it go. |
mike hunt 10.08.2009 01:25 |
real mature guys |
Ken8 10.08.2009 01:43 |
mike hunt wrote: real mature guys Jeez. God forbid I should defend Brian May around here! LOL! |
mike hunt 10.08.2009 02:30 |
The funny part is that the huge brian may fan is the one critisizing him. |
john bodega 10.08.2009 03:11 |
It's probably better that way. One shouldn't be a fan of someone else unless they're willing to see them realistically, and not just as some perfect being! |
mike hunt 10.08.2009 03:15 |
very true |
Woody43 10.08.2009 04:20 |
I'm late into this post - but where has Brian supposedly changed the credit for I Want It All - Live in the Ukraine has it creditted to Queen. As that is its latest release doesn't that prove that he has not changed the writing credit? |
bhm0129ad 10.08.2009 09:52 |
Personally I don't see what I said as an insult to Brian in the least. Each is entitled to their own opinion of things, but how you respond to other's posts is a different matter. Ken8 you are a very rude and immature person and the way you responded initially shows that. As Zebonka said, rightly, I may be a fan, but I am capable of seeing Brian as a human being with all the negative traits that come with it. The list of 'possibilities' as to why he changed the credits are ENDLESS and I offered merely ONE suggestion. For YOU to jump on my back for it is your pathetic little problem. As you would rudely say... 'get it'? |
Angeline 10.08.2009 12:51 |
bhm0129ad ------ 'pissed on Freddie's memory' 'his money going to a dead man's estate' PLEASE - you should write to Brian and ask to be his spokesperson. Then post his response, I'd find it very interesting. I can only imagine what Freddie would say. hehe |
bhm0129ad 10.08.2009 14:20 |
Angeline wrote: bhm0129ad ------ 'pissed on Freddie's memory' 'his money going to a dead man's estate' PLEASE - you should write to Brian and ask to be his spokesperson. Then post his response, I'd find it very interesting. I can only imagine what Freddie would say. hehe Take heed everyone - JAKE has spoken... |
Queen On Ice 10.08.2009 20:44 |
tay120 wrote: Is it just me or does Brian May seem overly obsessed with songwriting credits. For instance, he made a big deal about how he played for like 2 seconds at the beginning of one of the songs in "Chinese Democracy" and then didn't get credited. WHen someone once pointed out that Freddie was instructing him on his guitar playing during the making of "One Vision" he also got really defensive. Other times, it appears that he invents contributions that don't even exist. For instance, he made a big deal about how, during the line "shiver down my spine" in "Bohemian Rhapsody" he apparently added some special noise with his guitar. In fact, it turns out that this "special sound" was made by a percussion instrument called a bell tree and not by his guitar at all! Is this true? Is Brian really 'aggressive' about it? |
John Oswald 10.08.2009 20:58 |
I can't imagine Brian to be aggressive about anything to be honest lol |
Ken8 10.08.2009 21:06 |
Angeline wrote: bhm0129ad ------ 'pissed on Freddie's memory' 'his money going to a dead man's estate' PLEASE - you should write to Brian and ask to be his spokesperson. Then post his response, I'd find it very interesting. I can only imagine what Freddie would say. hehe I know. It's a waste of time. He can't see it |
Ken8 10.08.2009 21:28 |
bhm0129ad wrote:I may be a fan, but I am capable of seeing Brian as a human being with all the negative traits that come with it. The list of 'possibilities' as to why he changed the credits are ENDLESS and I offered merely ONE suggestion. For YOU to jump on my back for it is your pathetic little problem. As you would rudely say... 'get it'? One more time..... We all accept Brian May is just another "flawed" human being. The suggestion you thought appropriate to post was unfair speculation and insulting. A lot of us don't think May is as low as you think he could be. Let it go. I'm starting to wonder if you're that Canadian IR Luger or whatever his name was. Here's another idea. If you don't like people defending Brian May on a Queen message board, how about you going away? I'm critical of May a lot lately. I don't get upset when people here leap to his defence. I'd be staggered if they didn't! |