john bodega 15.06.2009 00:14 |
My sister walked me through some of the hubbub going on over there at the moment. What a fuckin' SHITSTORM. Can't we just find 'WMDs' there as well? |
Rick 15.06.2009 02:55 |
"Oh, what a kerfuffle!" Lou said. |
Bigfish 15.06.2009 04:45 |
I doubt very much that the elections in Iran were valid. None the less the west has a history of supporting States that don't even go through the motions of democracy for political or economic expediency so the hypocrisy of complaining about Iran is a little obvious. The problem with the middle east, is, has always been, and always shall be, Israel. Stop the genocide in Palestine, stop Israel building towns on the west bank, give the palestinians an independent state and I think you'll find Iran far more easy to deal with. We live in hope. |
JoxerTheDeityPirate 15.06.2009 05:33 |
"does anyone else care about Iran" reply: it depends at where their nuclear weapons are aimed at.. if they are aimed at my front door then yes i'm worried,If they are aimed at say..Birmingham or Devon then it can only improve the place if they go 'kaboom'. got nothing here in Cornwall to get them to aim anything at,its not as if there's a very large naval base [Culdrose] or the main satellite communications connection for Europe [Goonhilly] 2 miles up the road from me. oh wait.. *puts on tin hat and sits under the table* |
thomasquinn 32989 15.06.2009 07:56 |
What I consider very odd is that "they" (the Iranian potentates) decided to give Ahmadinejad around 70% of the vote. If they'd have announced that Ahmadinejad won with 52%, nobody would've found that result very suspect. Plus, arresting dozens of opposition leaders doesn't exactly add to your credibility, as the reasonably massive protests show... I just hope the Israeli government won't abuse this political farce for their own *private* interests (not those of their people), as they tend to do very strongly, especially with Netanyahu and Lieberman. |
Micrówave 15.06.2009 12:05 |
The people who went out and voted should really question themselves. So, if Proposition #3 was "No more shooting machine guns up in the air", would they really think they have a chance? |
pg 15.06.2009 16:05 |
. PEACE . |
«¤~Mrš. BÃD GÛŸ~¤» 15.06.2009 22:04 |
No...it should of been "nuked" a long time ago! |
john bodega 16.06.2009 03:10 |
«¤~Mrš. BÃD GÛŸ~¤» wrote: No...it should of been "nuked" a long time ago!And I thought you were stupid BEFORE... |
Bigfish 16.06.2009 07:56 |
Zebonka12 wrote:«¤~Mrš. BÃD GÛŸ~¤» wrote: No...it should of been "nuked" a long time ago!And I thought you were stupid BEFORE... Careful Zebster, that's actually Kate Winslett you're talking to there and she's not at her best when she's not allowed cakes or chocolate. |
FriedChicken 16.06.2009 08:04 |
Bigfish wrote: I doubt very much that the elections in Iran were valid. None the less the west has a history of supporting States that don't even go through the motions of democracy for political or economic expediency so the hypocrisy of complaining about Iran is a little obvious. The problem with the middle east, is, has always been, and always shall be, Israel. Stop the genocide in Palestine, stop Israel building towns on the west bank, give the palestinians an independent state and I think you'll find Iran far more easy to deal with. We live in hope. I think the founding of the state of Israel in 1948 was a mistake. Unfortunatly it's something you can't undo. |
Bigfish 16.06.2009 08:12 |
FriedChicken wrote:Bigfish wrote: I doubt very much that the elections in Iran were valid. None the less the west has a history of supporting States that don't even go through the motions of democracy for political or economic expediency so the hypocrisy of complaining about Iran is a little obvious. The problem with the middle east, is, has always been, and always shall be, Israel. Stop the genocide in Palestine, stop Israel building towns on the west bank, give the palestinians an independent state and I think you'll find Iran far more easy to deal with. We live in hope.I think the founding of the state of Israel in 1948 was a mistake. Unfortunatly it's something you can't undo. Yeah, you can go all the way back to 1898 and the birth of Political Zionism if you like. Nothing we can do about history and we can only learn from it if we listen... |
Micrówave 16.06.2009 10:51 |
Iran has now banned us from talking about the protest rallies taking place. All is well, it's a lovely place. People are very happy there. |
«¤~Mrš. BÃD GÛŸ~¤» 16.06.2009 13:56 |
Zebonka12 wrote:«¤~Mrš. BÃD GÛŸ~¤» wrote: No...it should of been "nuked" a long time ago!And I thought you were stupid BEFORE... Only someone STUPID talks about Iran and its politics on a Queen forum. If you can't take others opinions...then don't ask such stupid fuckin questions!!! |
john bodega 16.06.2009 13:58 |
I've never met such an ignorant cunt in my life. This is the personal section, don't you know? How many topics in this section are about Queen? You irrelevant pile of monkey toss. Isn't there a book signing you can drag your fat ass to? |
«¤~Mrš. BÃD GÛŸ~¤» 16.06.2009 14:06 |
And I"ve never met such a wimpy looking fucking child who has nothing better to do with his time than sit on this forum and insult everyone on it, or try to give the smartest answer to every immature question that's posted! Does it make you feel more like a man MR. VIRGIN????? Is this how you get your satisfaction in life...lord knows you can't get it anywhere else. Get a fucking life!!! Your the biggest fucking hypocrite I know!! Now be gone...before someone drops a house on you too!!! |
john bodega 16.06.2009 14:08 |
Fuck that was easy. Not to pick on your hyperbole there, but I don't insult everyone on this forum. Just the ones who deserve it ... I'd say 'please don't have kids', but I think you've inferred that it's too late for that already so do us a favour - drown your stupid spawn, right this minute. If you can get Jake Britt in the same bathtub while you're at it, we'll be laughing. |
«¤~Mrš. BÃD GÛŸ~¤» 16.06.2009 14:09 |
Just like you! |
john bodega 16.06.2009 14:10 |
«¤~Mrš. BÃD GÛŸ~¤» wrote: Just like you!Now there's a contradiction if I ever saw one!! Can't even make up your mind from post to post now ... |
«¤~Mrš. BÃD GÛŸ~¤» 16.06.2009 14:12 |
Are you having fun yet??? I bet this really gets you off eh???? |
john bodega 16.06.2009 14:21 |
No, it doesn't get me off at all. Actually I find this really depressing because there's one more of YOU around ... ignorant tossers. You literally don't give a crap about a whole country full of people. Isn't that more important than Queen, or that stupid Twilight book you're always reading? Someone posts a thread about something important for once and what's the best you can offer? 'Should've been nuked a long time ago'???? Let me ask you something; who is supposed to care about your stupid ass the next time your country is in trouble? I found Daniel Nester's whimperings incredibly amusing because they were both inaccurate and on a topic that doesn't really matter much in the scheme of things. You, on the other hand, are an ignorant bigot. You care about nothing but the sty you live in and that makes you a somewhat poor human being. I saw this and thought of you. Just for you Regards. |
«¤~Mrš. BÃD GÛŸ~¤» 16.06.2009 14:35 |
If there is ever another world war you dumbass...it won't matter cause we'll all be dead!! |
Bigfish 17.06.2009 03:29 |
«¤~Mrš. BÃD GÛŸ~¤» wrote: If there is ever another world war you dumbass...it won't matter cause we'll all be dead!! If there is a charity that supports people like you please let me know as I want to make a contribution. |
Micrówave 17.06.2009 11:08 |
Mrs. Bad Guy wrote: I"ve never met such a wimpy looking fucking child I totally agree!!!!! Unfortunately Zebonka is using a picture of Brian May... a wimpy looking fucking child. You should see the rest of the band!!! PS: Those sunglasses you're wearing are pretty gay. |
«¤~Mrš. BÃD GÛŸ~¤» 17.06.2009 13:39 |
Bigfish wrote:«¤~Mrš. BÃD GÛŸ~¤» wrote: If there is ever another world war you dumbass...it won't matter cause we'll all be dead!!If there is a charity that supports people like you please let me know as I want to make a contribution. My charity is "Nuke Iran, Iraq and Afghanistan" Feel free to donate!! |
«¤~Mrš. BÃD GÛŸ~¤» 17.06.2009 13:41 |
Micrówave wrote:Mrs. Bad Guy wrote: I"ve never met such a wimpy looking fucking childI totally agree!!!!! Unfortunately Zebonka is using a picture of Brian May... a wimpy looking fucking child. You should see the rest of the band!!! PS: Those sunglasses you're wearing are pretty gay. "Wink" Do you like them???? |
Micrówave 17.06.2009 14:56 |
No, and you really should shave. It's 2009, and we're not at the "disco" anymore. |
«¤~Mrš. BÃD GÛŸ~¤» 17.06.2009 15:03 |
Micrówave wrote: No, and you really should shave. It's 2009, and we're not at the "disco" anymore. Fuck shaving darling.....its much better with facial hair and it tingles me! |
john bodega 17.06.2009 15:08 |
«¤~Mrš. BÃD GÛŸ~¤» wrote: If there is ever another world war you dumbass...it won't matter cause we'll all be dead!!$20 says that the fallout gives me just enough time to gloat at your melted remains. |
«¤~Mrš. BÃD GÛŸ~¤» 17.06.2009 16:41 |
Zebonka12 wrote:«¤~Mrš. BÃD GÛŸ~¤» wrote: If there is ever another world war you dumbass...it won't matter cause we'll all be dead!!$20 says that the fallout gives me just enough time to gloat at your melted remains. Just remember when you go over for your summer vacation this year to a city in Iran to embrace your loving people, and the Iranian standing next to you smiles, and then deploys his suicide bomb...I'll be waiting to hear about you on the eleven o' clock news and I'll be doing my happy dance! This coming from a country that can't even have an election without someone getting shot and killed!!! |
Micrówave 17.06.2009 17:05 |
Zebonka is not FROM Iran, he only works there. |
«¤~Mrš. BÃD GÛŸ~¤» 17.06.2009 17:12 |
Micrówave wrote: Zebonka is not FROM Iran, he only works there. Are you sure he doesn't belong to the underground "Wanna be a Rag Head" society??? |
Treasure Moment 17.06.2009 17:18 |
the funny thing is that USA also has the illusion of choice, they choose between 2 parties and both are controlled by the same people. |
Philly Guy 17.06.2009 20:46 |
I see someone forgot to shut the screen door again... secret societies and black helicopters. We know, we get it, we don't care. |
Treasure Moment 17.06.2009 21:36 |
Philly Guy wrote: I see someone forgot to shut the screen door again... secret societies and black helicopters. We know, we get it, we don't care. its the simple truth, some people are extremely retarded and will never wake up to reality, you are one of them. |
Philly Guy 17.06.2009 23:34 |
derrrrrrrrrr....... I voted for Taft |
john bodega 18.06.2009 02:31 |
SETI are in on it too. |
Major Tom 18.06.2009 09:07 |
If your aim is a free-of-conflict-and-peaceful-place, I say: nuke it. The middle east will never be free of conflicts. Sad really, what people do in the name of god, or Allah or Shiva, whatever you prefer. |
john bodega 18.06.2009 10:57 |
Major Tom wrote: If your aim is a free-of-conflict-and-peaceful-place, I say: nuke it. The middle east will never be free of conflicts. Sad really, what people do in the name of god, or Allah or Shiva, whatever you prefer.Shouldn't we nuke the U.S.A as well? Look at the murder rate over there! |
Micrówave 18.06.2009 11:02 |
Let's nuke the whole planet and try again. |
JoxerTheDeityPirate 18.06.2009 11:06 |
Micrówave wrote: Let's nuke the whole planet and try again.give it 6 months and the North Koreans may do it for us.. but then again theyve just qualified for next years World Cup in South Africa so they may put 'world destruction' on the back-burner until South Korea beat them.. |
john bodega 18.06.2009 11:18 |
Micrówave wrote: Let's nuke the whole planet and try again.That's actually not the worst idea. I don't think it's fair to nuke one region; either we all get a chance, or we all get fucked! |
thomasquinn 32989 18.06.2009 13:31 |
Zebonka12 wrote:«¤~Mrš. BÃD GÛŸ~¤» wrote: If there is ever another world war you dumbass...it won't matter cause we'll all be dead!!$20 says that the fallout gives me just enough time to gloat at your melted remains. Right, this one's decisive. Zeb is the winner. |
ParisNair 19.06.2009 09:22 |
Major Tom wrote: If your aim is a free-of-conflict-and-peaceful-place, I say: nuke it. The middle east will never be free of conflicts. Sad really, what people do in the name of god, or Allah or Shiva, whatever you prefer.Don't you drag us Hindus into this, we have nothin to do with the conflict in the middle east [img=/images/smiley/msn/tounge_smile.gif][/img] |
Micrówave 19.06.2009 11:06 |
The Hindus have EVERYTHING to do with what's been going on. Let's nuke them, too. They should be third: Iran, North Korea, The Hindus |
john bodega 19.06.2009 11:23 |
Well if you can't beat them, join them ... let's turn this into a Who-Should-Get-Nuked thread. My money is on whatever country that wins Eurovision. One nuke a year should keep us safe for the rest of time. |
JoxerTheDeityPirate 19.06.2009 12:55 |
Zebonka12 wrote: Well if you can't beat them, join them ... let's turn this into a Who-Should-Get-Nuked thread.My money is on whatever country that wins Eurovision. One nuke a year should keep us safe for the rest of time. reply: thats the UK safe then as we have as much chance of winning Eurovision as New Zealand these days.. however,it appears that the Ayatollah of [not] Rock n Rolla has been reading my posts on page 1 about pointing the nukes at my front door and has taken it personally and has said that the British Government is the most corrupt and we [the UK] need to be destroyed.now im not usually one to agree with bearded towelheads who live in a cave in a desert but he does have a point,we never voted the one eyed Scottish twat into office nor did we have any say about duckhouses on expenses forms. but thats no excuse to point his nukes at me though :-[ |
john bodega 19.06.2009 13:12 |
Trust the Ayatollah to make a stupid crumby announcement. I'm totally buying land on Mars, folks. |
«¤~Mrš. BÃD GÛŸ~¤» 19.06.2009 13:46 |
Zebonka12 wrote: Well if you can't beat them, join them ... let's turn this into a Who-Should-Get-Nuked thread. Guess I'm not as stupid as you think....... |
john bodega 19.06.2009 14:10 |
Well there's a subtle difference; I don't actually think anybody should get nuked. You apparently do. |
«¤~Mrš. BÃD GÛŸ~¤» 19.06.2009 16:32 |
You asked the question...what kind of responses were you expecting?? Seems to me as long as everyone jumps on your "bandwagon" then its all okay. Someone says something you don't like and you call them "Stupid". Nice person..... says allot about the maturity level I guess. You want peace in a foreign country? You can't even be respectfully peaceful on a forum with others, and you hope for peace elsewhere?? funny..... |
john bodega 20.06.2009 03:29 |
Nurrr. Don't you talk to me about respect when everything you contribute here is mindless fluff! By and large, thinking that a nuclear bomb is a proper solution to a problem IS immature. That doesn't constitute a world view; actually, it's just a severe show of ignorance. Yes, nuking a populace 'gets rid of the problem'. It also gets rid of the people, and that's not preferable (to me). Why is Iran expendable when you are not? |
Mr Mercury 20.06.2009 05:58 |
JoxerTheDeityPirate wrote: however,it appears that the Ayatollah of [not] Rock n Rolla has been reading my posts on page 1 about pointing the nukes at my front door and has taken it personally and has said that the British Government is the most corrupt and we [the UK] need to be destroyed.now im not usually one to agree with bearded towelheads who live in a cave in a desert but he does have a point,we never voted the one eyed Scottish twat into office nor did we have any say about duckhouses on expenses forms. but thats no excuse to point his nukes at me though :-[Who the hell is this Ayatollah Khamelhair, or whatever his name is anyway? I thought that Pres. Achmadinnerjacket actually sounded like a decent man right up until these elections. Shows how much I really know or care about. Rigged - not rigged. Either way I dont care now that I, as a resident of the UK have labelled "evil" or whatever he called us. And you are right Joxer, we know our lot are bad enough without having to be told by others that they are. We are not that thick even though our "leaders" may think we are. |
JoxerTheDeityPirate 20.06.2009 06:08 |
^all he's done now is given our lot and that Barry O'bama fellow the excuse they needed to invade,dont they call it "a just provocation" or something? |
«¤~Mrš. BÃD GÛŸ~¤» 20.06.2009 12:26 |
«¤~Mrš. BÃD GÛŸ~¤» wrote: You asked the question...what kind of responses were you expecting?? Seems to me as long as everyone jumps on your "bandwagon" then its all okay. Someone says something you don't like and you call them "Stupid". Nice person..... says allot about the maturity level I guess. You want peace in a foreign country? You can't even be respectfully peaceful on a forum with others, and you hope for peace elsewhere?? funny..... Nurrr. Don't you talk to me about respect when everything you contribute here is mindless fluff! By and large, thinking that a nuclear bomb is a proper solution to a problem IS immature. That doesn't constitute a world view; actually, it's just a severe show of ignorance. Yes, nuking a populace 'gets rid of the problem'. It also gets rid of the people, and that's not preferable (to me). Why is Iran expendable when you are not? Ha...point made... however..not ignorance...its called fear. When the bombs are pointed in your direction..let me know how you feel. |
ParisNair 20.06.2009 15:09 |
Micrówave wrote: The Hindus have EVERYTHING to do with what's been going on. Let's nuke them, too. They should be third: Iran, North Korea, The Hindus3) Hindus? Obviously you've been brain-washed by false propaganda about us inncocent Hindus. Other than the occasional widow-burning, bride-burning, etc we are a peace-loving lot. |
Saint Jiub 20.06.2009 16:26 |
India is a beautiful country, and the vast majority of its people are peaceful. Of the few foreign counties I visited (China, Mexico, South Korea and Canada) India is my favorite by far. Fortunately, I will be most likely be visiting India on business in a few months. |
AspiringPhilosophe 21.06.2009 17:04 |
Good question Zeb....unfortunately a shit-ton of stupid responses. It's a shame there aren't more intelligent people on this forum; I'd actually enjoy a convo on this subject with someone with half a brain cell. This is exactly why I don't bother coming here much anymore. |
john bodega 22.06.2009 01:58 |
AspiringPhilosophe wrote: Good question Zeb....unfortunately a shit-ton of stupid responses. It's a shame there aren't more intelligent people on this forum; I'd actually enjoy a convo on this subject with someone with half a brain cell. This is exactly why I don't bother coming here much anymore.Actually I bitched in the random thoughts thread about some of this nonsense and quite honestly didn't feel like posting anymore. I've decided messing with the minds of the young and inept is too irresistible though. Once I haul my lazy arse into a job I'll probably devote my spare time to something useful. |
thomasquinn 32989 22.06.2009 07:22 |
AspiringPhilosophe wrote: Good question Zeb....unfortunately a shit-ton of stupid responses. It's a shame there aren't more intelligent people on this forum; I'd actually enjoy a convo on this subject with someone with half a brain cell. This is exactly why I don't bother coming here much anymore. Half a brain-cell? It'd be Treasure Moment you're wanting then. |
Bigfish 22.06.2009 07:27 |
«¤~Mrš. BÃD GÛŸ~¤» wrote:Bigfish wrote:My charity is "Nuke Iran, Iraq and Afghanistan" Feel free to donate!!«¤~Mrš. BÃD GÛŸ~¤» wrote: If there is ever another world war you dumbass...it won't matter cause we'll all be dead!!If there is a charity that supports people like you please let me know as I want to make a contribution. Kate, look, like I said somewhere else dieting and menstruation is not a good combination. Go and grab yourself some pies or something. |
AspiringPhilosophe 22.06.2009 13:25 |
ThomasQuinn wrote:AspiringPhilosophe wrote: Good question Zeb....unfortunately a shit-ton of stupid responses. It's a shame there aren't more intelligent people on this forum; I'd actually enjoy a convo on this subject with someone with half a brain cell. This is exactly why I don't bother coming here much anymore.Half a brain-cell? It'd be Treasure Moment you're wanting then. You're giving Treasure Moment half a brain cell? That's awful generous of you |
john bodega 22.06.2009 14:18 |
That's the 2nd best band in history you're trash talking there. |
«¤~Mrš. BÃD GÛŸ~¤» 22.06.2009 16:48 |
Bigfish wrote:«¤~Mrš. BÃD GÛŸ~¤» wrote:Kate, look, like I said somewhere else dieting and menstruation is not a good combination. Go and grab yourself some pies or something.Bigfish wrote:My charity is "Nuke Iran, Iraq and Afghanistan" Feel free to donate!!«¤~Mrš. BÃD GÛŸ~¤» wrote: If there is ever another world war you dumbass...it won't matter cause we'll all be dead!!If there is a charity that supports people like you please let me know as I want to make a contribution. No thanks FuckFish, What are you doing here?? I thought the Zoo was closed at night? |
JoxerTheDeityPirate 22.06.2009 17:56 |
Zebonka12 wrote: That's the 2nd best band in history you're trash talking there.one wouldnt want to be number 3 on that list would they..? :-p |
YourValentine 22.06.2009 20:32 |
I am so ashamed about this horrible thread. I cannot believe that people who have no care in the world think it's fun to post this crap here while the people in Iran fight for their freedom and we do not know how many have already been shot by their own police. |
thomasquinn 32989 23.06.2009 01:24 |
YV: Do not tell me that you, too, believe that Moussavi is a 'great liberator'. He was Prime Minister from '81-'89, and as you might know, Iran wasn't exactly the home of the free back then either. He is using the blood and lives of the Iranian people to get back in office, and I will not believe he will change anything until I see it. |
john bodega 23.06.2009 01:29 |
YourValentine wrote: I am so ashamed about this horrible thread. I cannot believe that people who have no care in the world think it's fun to post this crap here while the people in Iran fight for their freedom and we do not know how many have already been shot by their own police.Horrible thread, my fuckin' eye. I was asking this cesspit for an opinion and what'd I get? Mrs Bad Brain falling on her keyboard again. Don't blame me, I tried. I'm wearing green! *shrug* |
YourValentine 23.06.2009 03:20 |
@ Thomas Quinn - no, I do not believe that Moussawi is a "great liberator" but that was not my point. I do not think that this is was discussed in this thread. I think you know exactly what I meant. I am personally deeply ashamed about the posts in this threads which have nothing to do with the situation in Iran. I love being a member of Queenzone and I always felt "at home" here but this is disgraceful. I really like the humour on this board and how people get witty responses to stupid topics but this was not the case here. This thread is just a collection of frivolous rubbish. It feels like in a school class where nobody wants to be the one who "spoils the fun". Sorry if I spoil the "fun" but I could not take it any longer. As to your question about Moussawi: I am not an expert about the Iranian system but what we have heard in the last months there was a a growing dissatisfaction with Ahmadinejad because of the bad state of the economy, infrastructure, health system and education system (although Iran is such a rich country). I think that most people in Iran did not even question the system, they just wanted to get rid of Ahmadinejad, who is an international embarrassment for the country. As long as Bush was in office people had little chances to criticise Ahmadinejad because the country stood together against the war threat from America but now after President Obama offered a new dialogue people saw the chance to get out of the international isolation. Now that the elections were so obviously rigged people get angry and it's well possible that they now question the system after the police has been shooting the people in the streets. It takes a lot of courage to protest in the streets when you do not live in a country where your right to demonstrate is protected by the constitution. Many people will die and the outcome is totally unpredictable. |
JoxerTheDeityPirate 23.06.2009 04:07 |
Zebonka12 wrote:Don't blame me, I tried. I'm wearing green! *shrug*YourValentine wrote: I am so ashamed about this horrible thread. I cannot believe that people who have no care in the world think it's fun to post this crap here while the people in Iran fight for their freedom and we do not know how many have already been shot by their own police.Horrible thread, my fuckin' eye. I was asking this cesspit for an opinion and what'd I get? Mrs Bad Brain falling on her keyboard again. reply: most of this 'crap' was written BEFORE the country went 'tits up',so unless everyone has developed ESP then there was no way anyone could of forecast the current problems in Iran by writing what they did. i also agree with TQ that the other dude is just as bad as the 'Ahmydinnerjacket' fellow and is using the result as an excuse to cause mayhem on the streets. as the old Cornish saying goes "this will all end in tears" im just gonna carry on sitting under my table with my colander on my head,coz the outcome in Iran could still turn uglier than a Treasure Moment concert in HD |
john bodega 23.06.2009 04:31 |
From what I was hearing, it was already that bad when I started my thread. It just took the rest of the world a fucking long time (almost inexcusably long) to catch on. Which is perhaps why I went off at Mrs Bad Guy for being (or at least seeming like) a dick. |
«¤~Mrš. BÃD GÛŸ~¤» 23.06.2009 14:24 |
Zebonka12 wrote: From what I was hearing, it was already that bad when I started my thread. It just took the rest of the world a fucking long time (almost inexcusably long) to catch on. Which is perhaps why I went off at Mrs Bad Guy for being (or at least seeming like) a dick. I really don't give a shit what you think about me Zebonka....No matter what anyone thinks or feels isn't going to change the situation over there. The country is now in a crisis, and I'm suppossed to worry and care about these people??? What the hell for?? My own people in my own country are a million fold more important to me than this hen house shit that will never cease to end. We're in a recession right now and so many other things in my own country and community need attention and hold my interest. More than a people that turn against one another, that shoot now and kill and ask questions later. Meanwhile my Canadian Soldiers are being killed weekly in Afghanistan not for democracy or women's rights, it seems to me its to fulfill the U.S. needs by aiding to dominate the middle east and control its damn oil supplies!! |
Micrówave 23.06.2009 17:25 |
First off, I can't see how THIS THREAD should make anyone feel any better or any worse about the situation in Iran. We are not going to solve the problem here on Queenzone.
But, I can't let you off the hook, Barbara, or should I say Barbama???
Barbara dished out this: there was a a growing dissatisfaction with Ahmadinejad because of the bad state of the economy, infrastructure, health system and education system (although Iran is such a rich country). I think that most people in Iran did not even question the system, they just wanted to get rid of Ahmadinejad, who is an international embarrassment for the country.Really, I thought only George Bush rigged elections. How did this guy stay in power over there? Bad "economy, infrastructure, health system and education system" has been going on for years there. Prior to Ahmadjinejabba's rise to power, they had the same troubles they're having now, except they have become the most powerful country in that region due to their military might and progress in enriching Uranium. As long as Bush was in office people had little chances to criticise Ahmadinejad because the country stood together against the war threat from America but now after President Obama offered a new dialogue people saw the chance to get out of the international isolation.I knew George had to figure in there somewhere!!!! So now President Obama has offered a new dialogue, huh? Exactly what dialogue to you refer, Barbara? Because eveything I've read shows Ahmadinejad just as critical of Obama as he was Bush. If you've seen something different, please let us know your source. You might have breaking news here!! Now that the elections were so obviously rigged people get angry and it's well possible that they now question the system after the police has been shooting the people in the streets.You watch far too much Fox News. It takes a lot of courage to protest in the streets when you do not live in a country where your right to demonstrate is protected by the constitution.I don't call that courage, I call that stupidity. Can you name some "martyr" in the past that has protested an election in the streets of their country and was killed? Just one. Name one. Many people will die and the outcome is totally unpredictable.Ah, such is life. |
Micrówave 23.06.2009 17:30 |
and then Mrs. Bad Guy throws this out: Meanwhile my Canadian Soldiers are being killed weekly in Afghanistan not for democracy or women's rights, it seems to me its to fulfill the U.S. needs by aiding to dominate the middle east and control its damn oil supplies Your Canadian Soldiers? Please!!! What, do you have one of those ribbon magnets on your car or something that says "Support Our Troops"? Well, good for you!!! Please tell us about the wealth of oil in Afghanistan. Please tell us how the Russians invaded Afghanistan long before the US set up shop there, just so those Russians could control it's damn oil supplies. How'd that work out for the Russians? Is it "Blow It Out Your Ass" week on Queenzone, or something? I missed the memo. |
«¤~Mrš. BÃD GÛŸ~¤» 23.06.2009 18:33 |
Micrówave wrote:and then Mrs. Bad Guy throws this out: Meanwhile my Canadian Soldiers are being killed weekly in Afghanistan not for democracy or women's rights, it seems to me its to fulfill the U.S. needs by aiding to dominate the middle east and control its damn oil suppliesYour Canadian Soldiers? Please!!! What, do you have one of those ribbon magnets on your car or something that says "Support Our Troops"? Well, good for you!!! Please tell us about the wealth of oil in Afghanistan. Please tell us how the Russians invaded Afghanistan long before the US set up shop there, just so those Russians could control it's damn oil supplies. How'd that work out for the Russians? Is it "Blow It Out Your Ass" week on Queenzone, or something? I missed the memo. Quote: And I thought you were stupid before |
JoxerTheDeityPirate 24.06.2009 04:07 |
its like 1979/80/81 all over again isnt it? first the start of an Iranian revolution, then the shooting in the streets,then the expelling of British diplomats followed by the obliguatory expelling of Iranian diplomats from Britain [the US diplomats will be next to get the heave ho by Mr Dinnerjacket]. all we need now is Kate Adie to set up a tent outside the Iranian Embassy in London... |
john bodega 24.06.2009 05:07 |
«¤~Mrš. BÃD GÛŸ~¤» wrote: More than a people that turn against one another, that shoot now and kill and ask questions later.See that's what I don't get. You're willing to write them all off as the same (when so many of them are peacefully protesting - and getting shot for it). That's a tad dehumanising don't you think? As long as you don't expect anyone to give a toss about your country the next time it's in trouble, then your stance is at least fair in that it's not hypocritical. However, that attitude is at the center of what's wrong with the world today; you're part of the problem and you should realise this. If everyone looked out for each other, instead of being "ME ME ME" the way you are, then I reckon at least some parts of the world would be a bit safer. You could probably learn something from the people you're ignoring. |
«¤~Mrš. BÃD GÛŸ~¤» 24.06.2009 11:21 |
Zebonka12 wrote:«¤~Mrš. BÃD GÛŸ~¤» wrote: More than a people that turn against one another, that shoot now and kill and ask questions later.See that's what I don't get. You're willing to write them all off as the same (when so many of them are peacefully protesting - and getting shot for it). That's a tad dehumanising don't you think? As long as you don't expect anyone to give a toss about your country the next time it's in trouble, then your stance is at least fair in that it's not hypocritical. However, that attitude is at the center of what's wrong with the world today; you're part of the problem and you should realise this. If everyone looked out for each other, instead of being "ME ME ME" the way you are, then I reckon at least some parts of the world would be a bit safer. You could probably learn something from the people you're ignoring. I highly doubt Canada will ever be in trouble Zebonka...if you know anything about us..we're the "peacekeepers". I don't support the war, or whats going on there. I don't know why your getting your nighty in such a knot over my opinion. The middle east has been at conflict longer than I've been alive. It's run by Ayatollahs and dominated by anit simitism. I'll bet you support Iran's right to having nuclear weapons too? If you had kids of your own...would you send your kids there to die? |
Micrówave 24.06.2009 12:10 |
anit simitism Yeah, he's the one stirring things up over there... him and Ayatollah. Jeez, if you really don't know much, perhaps you should leave the conversation. If you're drinking the Kool-Aid, well then have another cup. |
«¤~Mrš. BÃD GÛŸ~¤» 24.06.2009 13:42 |
Micrówave wrote:anit simitismYeah, he's the one stirring things up over there... him and Ayatollah. Jeez, if you really don't know much, perhaps you should leave the conversation. If you're drinking the Kool-Aid, well then have another cup. I think you know what I meant..(anti semitism) Do you even know what it means microwave?? I'll cut down on the kool-aid as long as you agree to start cleaning your pipe more often and stop inhaling all that residue! |
YourValentine 24.06.2009 14:13 |
Micrówave wrote: First off, I can't see how THIS THREAD should make anyone feel any better or any worse about the situation in Iran. We are not going to solve the problem here on Queenzone. But, I can't let you off the hook, Barbara, or should I say Barbama???Barbara dished out this: there was a a growing dissatisfaction with Ahmadinejad because of the bad state of the economy, infrastructure, health system and education system (although Iran is such a rich country). I think that most people in Iran did not even question the system, they just wanted to get rid of Ahmadinejad, who is an international embarrassment for the country.Really, I thought only George Bush rigged elections. How did this guy stay in power over there? Bad "economy, infrastructure, health system and education system" has been going on for years there. Prior to Ahmadjinejabba's rise to power, they had the same troubles they're having now, except they have become the most powerful country in that region due to their military might and progress in enriching Uranium.As long as Bush was in office people had little chances to criticise Ahmadinejad because the country stood together against the war threat from America but now after President Obama offered a new dialogue people saw the chance to get out of the international isolation.I knew George had to figure in there somewhere!!!! So now President Obama has offered a new dialogue, huh? Exactly what dialogue to you refer, Barbara? Because eveything I've read shows Ahmadinejad just as critical of Obama as he was Bush. If you've seen something different, please let us know your source. You might have breaking news here!!Now that the elections were so obviously rigged people get angry and it's well possible that they now question the system after the police has been shooting the people in the streets.You watch far too much Fox News.It takes a lot of courage to protest in the streets when you do not live in a country where your right to demonstrate is protected by the constitution.I don't call that courage, I call that stupidity. Can you name some "martyr" in the past that has protested an election in the streets of their country and was killed? Just one. Name one.Many people will die and the outcome is totally unpredictable.Ah, such is life. I am sure you would not risk the dirt under your fingernails to make a change in this world. Yes, why should people fight for what they believe in? How stupid to risk something to gain abetter life! You, Sir, have the freedom you have because people fought for it and died for it before your time. You think you are so smart but you are even too stupid to read and understand a message or else you would not quote me and then switch the argument around. Suggestions and innuendoes is all you have to offer. I never claimed to know all the details of the situation in Iran- on the contrary. FYI we do not have Fox News here. My source is a friend who is professor of Middle Eastern Studies and lived in the Iran for 8 years but I am sure he knows nothing compared to you. This was the last time I replied to one of your incredibly dumb posts. |
john bodega 24.06.2009 14:46 |
Microwave didn't so much as ask for that, as he did beg for it. |
«¤~Mrš. BÃD GÛŸ~¤» 24.06.2009 14:51 |
Zebonka12 wrote:«¤~Mrš. BÃD GÛŸ~¤» wrote: More than a people that turn against one another, that shoot now and kill and ask questions later.See that's what I don't get. You're willing to write them all off as the same (when so many of them are peacefully protesting - and getting shot for it). That's a tad dehumanising don't you think? You mean dehumanize??? I don't know what channels you watch, or what your media coverage is down under..... I have yet to see them peacefully protest. Just ask Neda and the 19 others who have been killed or arrested during these protests. If they were so peacefully protesting...then why all the killing?? |
john bodega 24.06.2009 15:25 |
I don't watch 'channels', thanks. They're frankly useless - over dinner, I saw more coverage on TV about products for the rich and famous than I did on Iran. Do yourself a favour and dig around if you want to inform yourself. For God's sake don't rely on just one source of information. Only a fool would do that... And your assertion that someone would have to be a violent dissident to be shot at is fuckin' disgusting. In the case of that woman, maybe the sniper missed, maybe he was aiming at someone who looked a little rough; but what the hell was he doing sniping at all? AND ... in real English, it's not the end of the world if you use an 's' instead of a 'z'. At least recognise the rules of the people who invented the language, even if you don't abide by them. |
ParisNair 24.06.2009 16:08 |
One thing that you have to understand is that this is how power-politics is played in this part of the world. The common man is used/abused by the politicians to get even with each other and to snatch power. Similar incidents of mass-protests all over South Asia. They only vary slightly from country to country, depending on the "cultural" differences and the strength of the democratic process. For example, in my country it is very common for a small-time politician to round up people in his locality and motivate them to protest against total non-issues. These protests often turn into mobs that go on a rampage and destroy private and public property. Naturally the governing body of the locality would send the police to control the mob and the police may use force. As a result, some protesters are liable to get a broken arm or leg but the incident hardly ever snow-balls into something bigger. In my country (India) these things never get so big as to make international news because the politicians involved are not of consequence; they just do it to get some sort of publicity. I'm sure something similar has happened in Iran as well, only on a larger scale. I'm not a supporter of Ahmednijad (IMO some of his coments are absolutely immature and barbaric for a President), but I can't imagine the other guy being much better. For sure, the current situation in Iran has nothing to do with Israel or any other middle easter issue. This just a local issue; the other guy is just being a bad loser that's all. People are getting injured and some have lost their lives as well, but they can hardly be called martyrs or anything like that. |
john bodega 25.06.2009 00:18 |
Heh... well put. I think he has every right to be a sore loser; right after he gives up power and tells the snipers to go home.. |
Micrówave 25.06.2009 11:09 |
Zebonka12 wrote: Microwave didn't so much as ask for that, as he did beg for it.And she delivered... big time. That's the problem in here sometimes... especially with the "way to go, Barb!" Kool-Aid. She didn't address most of the points mentioned and her source was a "friend". Have you seen maybe FoxNews, CNN, or ABC today, Barb? Thursday, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the declared winner in the disputed June 12 election, told President Obama to stop "interfering" in Iran's affairs, the semi-official Fars news agency reported. Barb's friend, the professor says: President Obama offered a new dialogue people saw the chance to get out of the international isolation. Hmmmmm...... So you and your friend were wrong. The last time you replied to one of my stupid points was when you were preaching about how great Amnesty International was. Where are they now, by the way? Don't hear much out of them about Iran. Everytime you respond, Barbara, you get all offended. If you're gonna dish out your crap about things you barely know anything about, you're probably gonna find one (or maybe two) people here that aren't intimidated by you enough to say "Wait a minute, you're wrong." By the way, I'm wrong quite a lot of the time. Like thinking a reasonable dialogue with you is possible about a subject outside of Queen. I guess I should drink the Kool Aid first next time, and say "Bingo! Barb, you're spot on!" Where did your friend, The Professor, get his degree from? Gilligan's Island? And what part of Iran did he live in? UptisAss? |
«¤~Mrš. BÃD GÛŸ~¤» 25.06.2009 11:53 |
Zebonka12 wrote: I don't watch 'channels', thanks. They're frankly useless - over dinner, I saw more coverage on TV about products for the rich and famous than I did on Iran. Do yourself a favour and dig around if you want to inform yourself. For God's sake don't rely on just one source of information. Only a fool would do that... And your assertion that someone would have to be a violent dissident to be shot at is fuckin' disgusting. In the case of that woman, maybe the sniper missed, maybe he was aiming at someone who looked a little rough; but what the hell was he doing sniping at all? AND ... in real English, it's not the end of the world if you use an 's' instead of a 'z'. At least recognise the rules of the people who invented the language, even if you don't abide by them. Oh fuck your rules...who died and made you Grace fucking Kelly? And...Oh my God...Mr. "so does anyone else care about Iran" can't answer my question?? Maybe if you watched the news or read a newspaper you would know more about the the sickening bullshit going on over there. Do you always ask questions with questions? Or better yet jump on the next boat or airplane and join a peace group, and go and fucking save Iran. |
john bodega 25.06.2009 12:25 |
Micrówave wrote: That's the problem in here sometimes... especially with the "way to go, Barb!" Kool-Aid.Hey look I totally don't drink that. And also what is Kool-Aid. No seriously, I'm not a member of that brigade. I was actually a bit miffed with Barb's post because I started this thread expecting a semi-sane response from maybe a couple of people and instead got a bunch of horse shit from Mrs Pork Butt. << That name is aimed at the loser up there, not Barb by the way. In any event it's small chips. I don't think a bunch of people on a forum can change anything and that's not why I made the fuckin' thread... |
john bodega 25.06.2009 12:26 |
«¤~Mrš. BÃD GÛŸ~¤» wrote: Do you always ask questions with questions?I assume you mean 'answer' questions with questions, in which case; yes, I do. I'm Jewish. Aren't I? |
Mr Mercury 25.06.2009 13:04 |
Zebonka12 wrote:«¤~Mrš. BÃD GÛŸ~¤» wrote: Do you always ask questions with questions?I assume you mean 'answer' questions with questions, in which case; yes, I do. I'm Jewish. Aren't I? You are? Why dont you know? |
Yara 25.06.2009 13:05 |
Zebonka12 wrote:
Hey look I totally don't drink that. And also what is Kool-Aid.
No seriously, I'm not a member of that brigade. I was actually a bit miffed with Barb's post because I started this thread expecting a semi-sane response from maybe a couple of people and instead got a bunch of horse shit from Mrs Pork Butt. << That name is aimed at the loser up there, not Barb by the way.
In any event it's small chips. I don't think a bunch of people on a forum can change anything and that's not why I made the fuckin' thread...
Hi, Zebonka12, my dear! How are you? I was very happy that you created the thread and I really appreciated it. I didn't step in mainly because I just don't know what to say. In face of so much violence I usually fail to say anything. Violence and lack of meaning, in my worldview, walk hand in hand: in face of the brutality of Iran's police what can I say? Worse: what can be done? People either suggest bombing the country, which would result in the death of thousands of people like Neda, or imposing sanctions on the country, and the civilians would, again, pay the price, pretty much as Iraqi civilians were harmed by the U.N sanctions program back in the 90's. A program that caused so much havoc that even the guys responsible for carrying it out refused to go on - respected and highly-regarded ambassadors just throwing the towel and saying: it's enough. The population is paying too huge a toll and I feel like taking part in the destruction of a whole country. I'm out. It's too brutal an event not to be condemned and harshly criticized - the Iranian state is to blame. They don't allow free elections from the very beginning: they forbid many candidates of taking part in the elections and then choose the usual intolerant zealots who're not going to pose any threat to the regime's basic tenets. The violence of the police is just gruesome. Blaming it on people who were out there peacefully demonstrating is very low and ugly. The kind of reaction of Iranian's riot police wouldn't be justified even if they had a judicial order to arrest a criminal - they are beating people with such a degree of violence and humiliating them so ruthlessly that I really can't recall the last time I watched or read anything similar. I hope you're doing fine. Take care and have a nice day. Regards, Yara. |
john bodega 25.06.2009 13:45 |
Mr Mercury wrote: You are? Why dont you know?You're asking ME this?? |
john bodega 25.06.2009 13:53 |
Yara wrote: Hi, Zebonka12, my dear! How are you? I was very happy that you created the thread and I really appreciated it. I didn't step in mainly because I just don't know what to say. In face of so much violence I usually fail to say anything. Violence and lack of meaning, in my worldview, walk hand in hand: in face of the brutality of Iran's police what can I say? Worse: what can be done? People either suggest bombing the country, which would result in the death of thousands of people like Neda, or imposing sanctions on the country, and the civilians would, again, pay the price, pretty much as Iraqi civilians were harmed by the U.N sanctions program back in the 90's. A program that caused so much havoc that even the guys responsible for carrying it out refused to go on - respected and highly-regarded ambassadors just throwing the towel and saying: it's enough. The population is paying too huge a toll and I feel like taking part in the destruction of a whole country. I'm out. It's too brutal an event not to be condemned and harshly criticized - the Iranian state is to blame. They don't allow free elections from the very beginning: they forbid many candidates of taking part in the elections and then choose the usual intolerant zealots who're not going to pose any threat to the regime's basic tenets. The violence of the police is just gruesome. Blaming it on people who were out there peacefully demonstrating is very low and ugly. The kind of reaction of Iranian's riot police wouldn't be justified even if they had a judicial order to arrest a criminal - they are beating people with such a degree of violence and humiliating them so ruthlessly that I really can't recall the last time I watched or read anything similar. I hope you're doing fine. Take care and have a nice day. Regards, Yara.What pisses me off is the suggestion that it's even remotely okay to retaliate against the protestors - violent or not. That might sound silly but consider the dodginess of the election and the (full and supervised) recount that would surely put the riots to an end IF the regime had won legitimately... if only they'd do the fucking thing. Partial recount? What's the problem; is a recount expensive? Well it can't be as expensive as firing high powered weapons into your own people. These aren't insurgents; they're protestors, and rowdy or otherwise they don't justify deadly force. Microwave rightly brought up that 'the other guy' is probably just as much a dick, but the point is he's the dick that should've been put into power because that's what Iran wanted. Fuck. Is any of that too hard for some people to get? |
Mr Mercury 25.06.2009 14:09 |
Zebonka12 wrote:Mr Mercury wrote: You are? Why dont you know?You're asking ME this?? Why cant I? lol |
Micrówave 25.06.2009 15:58 |
For an explanation of my Kool Aid reference, click here. As to your original post, I was with you there. And I agree that Mrs. Bad Guy tried to ramshackle this thread with utter nonsense and continues to do so. I was hoping Barbara was serious about bringing back a logical, thought provoking conversation. But then the soapbox came out, she stood up, and proceeded us to tell us why the world is all wrong, Obama is our savior, an untimely George Bush reference, and how I'm a coward for not wanting to die. Look, my grandfather and some of his friends had to deal directly with people from her country on a beach in France a long time ago. So I kinda draw the line at a few softballs thrown my way from time to time. But this is an isolated event in one country, not an invasion. And I have no respect for the "Support our (fill in the blank)" crowd. It takes more than a magnet on your car or a subscription to Amnesty International (that includes a nifty decal of a candle with thorns!) to make me think you can tell me what is what. The original topic of this thread was asking if anybody cares about Iran. I have yet to see an answer to that question... a good honest answer. So all bullshit aside, here I go. No, I do not care about Iran. Iran, as a country. I think it should be split up, at least in half, maybe more. A few of those countries over there could use that. It seems to difficult to get along when you have (1) different religious beliefs and (2) automatic weapons waving around aimlessly. We seem to be able to do that ok here in Texas, but we make you wait five days and do a supposed background check. It is a shame that people are dying, but consider this. Instead of going out protesting, drawing signs, waiving said automatic weapons, and crying for CNN, I would suggest staying inside and bolting the door. Maybe stop by the grocery and pickup an extra loaf of bread or two. Is this cowardice? No, I think it's good advice if you want to live to waive your weapon another day (pun intended). Do I think we should demand a recount?!?!?! Absolutely not, it's their deal, let them handle it. I think sanctions can and do work, let the international community decide. Yeah, that may starve a lot of poor little babies, but again, that's their deal. We have plenty of poor little babies to worry about, and they do not have automatic weapons... yet. Good luck, Ahmedjabbathehutt. You erased a lot of history, like the holocaust and the cold war. I wish those things never happened either. If you can convince your people of that, then maybe you can convince them of anything and blow yourselves up. Again, that's your deal, you handle that. |
Micrówave 25.06.2009 17:32 |
By the way, if The Professor of Middle Eastern Studies is on Queenzone, here's the exact quote:
"Do you think that this kind of behavior is going to solve any of your problems? It will only make people think you are someone like Bush," "You are at the beginning of your way and you are gaining experience, and we do not wish the scandals of the Bush era to be repeated during your term of office," the Iranian leader said. Um, I don't think he likes Barack either. Barb: I think it is wise for you to stop replying to my dumb posts. You've been scoreboarded once again and I didn't need my friend who is a Doctor at Johns Hopkins. You make it very easy. Stick to Queen. |
Saint Jiub 25.06.2009 20:35 |
YourValentine wrote:
This was the last time I replied to one of your incredibly dumb posts.
Evidently Microwave can't read that Barb won't be replying. |
Saint Jiub 25.06.2009 20:40 |
|
john bodega 26.06.2009 03:24 |
"Look, my grandfather and some of his friends had to deal directly with people from her country on a beach in France a long time ago. So I kinda draw the line at a few softballs thrown my way from time to time" See I've got a different perspective on that because my grandfather on Mum's side was busily bombing my Dad's country while my grandfather on Dad's side was busy in telecommunications... when you're related to both sides in a war you're somewhat compelled to resolve these 'who did what and why' issues. "And I agree that Mrs. Bad Guy tried to ramshackle this thread with utter nonsense and continues to do so." It is somewhat vexing, to say the least. "Do I think we should demand a recount?!?!?! Absolutely not, it's their deal, let them handle it." Indeed; it's probably not our business, but as an observer I just think a full recount would resolve the matter decisively. If it needs outside assistance to be even remotely reliable, so be it. "he original topic of this thread was asking if anybody cares about Iran. I have yet to see an answer to that question... a good honest answer. " Well here's mine; I don't care about Iran any more than I would any other country on the planet when it's in a whole lot of shit. Having said that, I don't believe that any of our nations can just go in and 'fix' things - Look what happens when we try!!! Our so-called civilised nations had to get there on their own; you can't force something like a Western lifestyle on a country; the people have to adopt it themselves, they have to want it. Clearly the average people over there are caught in this conundrum though. They want the choices, freedoms and responsibilities that we've got, but they've still got dictator-style morons that were old hat 50 years ago to choose from. I guess the hippy in me started this thread because, while I know there's probably nothing anyone can do, it would be nice to see people think about it, and maybe nicer to see a bit of concern for these people. The same concern I had for the violence in Ireland, or a plane crash in the Atlantic, or (and this could invoke a new generation of Godwin's Law) planes being flown into buildings. |
Micrówave 26.06.2009 11:17 |
Panchgani wrote: YourValentine wrote: This was the last time I replied to one of your incredibly dumb posts.Evidently Microwave can't read that Barb won't be replying. Oh, I can read. I was hoping maybe her Professor would come on here and talk about genetics. But, i guess you can't read either. Or do you make a habit of inserting your opinion where it really doesn't matter? Please re-read the title of this thread and either: (1) post or (2) piss off |
«¤~Mrš. BÃD GÛŸ~¤» 26.06.2009 11:50 |
Micrówave wrote:Panchgani wrote: YourValentine wrote: This was the last time I replied to one of your incredibly dumb posts.Evidently Microwave can't read that Barb won't be replying. Oh, I can read. I was hoping maybe her Professor would come on here and talk about genetics. But, i guess you can't read either. Or do you make a habit of inserting your opinion where it really doesn't matter? Please re-read the title of this thread and either: (1) post or (2) piss off Its ok, Valentine, you must understand Shitbonka and Microwave are the only two authors on this forum that think they give the best answer to any, or all questions on this site. And remember any similarities between them and human is purely coincidental. |
Saint Jiub 27.06.2009 00:15 |
Micrówave wrote:
Barb: I think it is wise for you to stop replying to my dumb posts.
You posted the above after YV indicated she would no longer reply to your crap. What part did I misread, Clarence Thomas, er I mean Micrologic? link A strip search for a 2 Advil pills is reasonable? Clarence sounds like your kind of guy. |
Saint Jiub 27.06.2009 00:16 |
Dbl post - I got a QZ error on my 1st post, but it went through anyway ...weird |
john bodega 27.06.2009 03:42 |
"Zebonka and Microwave are the only two authors on this forum that think they give the best answer to any, or all questions on this site." Well someone has an inferiority complex! I don't give the best answers; that's a qualitative statement and complete bunkum. With every post you bury yourself in a deeper pile of illogic. Can't you grow up? Granted I post a lot of trash on here too so I get why you might enjoy it, BUT - there's a time for play and a time for semi-seriousness. |
thomasquinn 32989 27.06.2009 05:31 |
Oh, great. On the one side, we have the Mrs. Bad Guy-figure giving a good impression of a monkey slamming the 'Nuke' button, on the other we have Microwave being his regular obnoxious self, then there is YV who has taken out her blood-curdling political correctness act again, and fatty's too busy making fun of the non-recyclable parts of Michael Jackson to provide some comic relief here. And then, as if it isn't enough, there is a post claiming that there are two Zoners who think they have the absolute answer to everything, and I'm not in the list!!! |
thomasquinn 32989 27.06.2009 05:31 |
EDIT: Double Post. |
JoxerTheDeityPirate 27.06.2009 07:07 |
^you want to borrow my tin hat and sit under the dining table whilst i nip to the shops and stock up on spam and corned beef? |
«¤~Mrš. BÃD GÛŸ~¤» 27.06.2009 12:34 |
ThomasQuinn wrote: Oh, great. On the one side, we have the Mrs. Bad Guy-figure giving a good impression of a monkey slamming the 'Nuke' button, on the other we have Microwave being his regular obnoxious self, then there is YV who has taken out her blood-curdling political correctness act again, and fatty's too busy making fun of the non-recyclable parts of Michael Jackson to provide some comic relief here. And then, as if it isn't enough, there is a post claiming that there are two Zoners who think they have the absolute answer to everything, and I'm not in the list!!! Too be on the list Mr. Quinn you must earn it! |
«¤~Mrš. BÃD GÛŸ~¤» 27.06.2009 12:50 |
Zebonka12 wrote: "Zebonka and Microwave are the only two authors on this forum that think they give the best answer to any, or all questions on this site." Well someone has an inferiority complex! I don't give the best answers; that's a qualitative statement and complete bunkum. With every post you bury yourself in a deeper pile of illogic. Can't you grow up? Granted I post a lot of trash on here too so I get why you might enjoy it, BUT - there's a time for play and a time for semi-seriousness. Shemalebonka: Don't you even recognize sarcasm when your read it?? I have yet to see any semi seriousness on this site. That's actually laughable!! That's your problem too..you actually believe what I wrote...now that's just plain gullible. Lighten the hell up! |
thomasquinn 32989 27.06.2009 13:08 |
You are absolutely and totally out of your skull, aren't you? |
-fatty- 2850 27.06.2009 13:52 |
To quote one of my favourite fims "What we got hyah, is failure to 'municate"* Someone (let's call them Mrs Gad Buy) makes an ill-judged comment concerning a soloution to the problems in Iran. Along comes someone else (let's call them Bezonka12) who takes this comment seriously and chides Mrs Gad Buy for their staggering levels of ignorance on the subject. At this point it might have been wiser for Mrs Gad Buy to point out that her (or is it his?) remarks were not supposed to be taken literally and were probably made just to express her (or is it his?) frustration at what seems to be a hopeless situation. Chances are, Bezonka12 would nod his (or is it her?....No it's definately a him, he's got a moustache. Mind you so has my wife.) head and hark back to a similar situation in which his use of the word "Faggot" was taken seriously and he was branded a homophobe. Realising that the whole thing had been a bit of a mis-understanding, things would soon return to normal. Mrs Gad Buy and Bezonka12 would become bosom buddies, romance would blossom and within a month or two they would marry. Providing of course that Mrs Gad Buy is in fact a female. After all it's a well known fact amongst Queenzoners that Bezonka12 hates queers. Okay. Now that that's been sorted out I have a question of my own. Is it just me or does anyone else think that the holocaust never actually happened? fatty. *P.S It was Cool Hand Luke in case you're wondering. |
Crazy LittleThing 27.06.2009 17:46 |
-fatty- wrote: *P.S It was Cool Hand Luke in case you're wondering. How many eggs? |
«¤~Mrš. BÃD GÛŸ~¤» 27.06.2009 18:22 |
ThomasQuinn wrote: You are absolutely and totally out of your skull, aren't you? Of course, aren't we all. |
7Innuendo7 27.06.2009 23:03 |
yes. anyone else does care about Iran. however, it's still unclear how much of the Savak's tactics will be used before Iran implodes further. it shouldn't have an effect on OPEC, but speak, Neda, SING!!! |
7Innuendo7 27.06.2009 23:05 |
Interestingly Norman Schwarzkopf, General over American forces in Desert Storm, was one of the original CIA trainers for the Shah's secret police. |
Saif 28.06.2009 02:23 |
Crazy LittleThing wrote:-fatty- wrote: *P.S It was Cool Hand Luke in case you're wondering.How many eggs? No man can eat 50 eggs! |
thomasquinn 32989 28.06.2009 04:10 |
7Innuendo7 wrote: Interestingly Norman Schwarzkopf, General over American forces in Desert Storm, was one of the original CIA trainers for the Shah's secret police. I wouldn't so much call that interesting as obvious. The Iranian revolution of '79 was, in part, a response to US backing of a hated and corrupt leader. Who was replaced by a hated, corrupt and fundamentalist leadership. |
JoxerTheDeityPirate 28.06.2009 10:33 |
seems i am ahead of the game with Iran as the 'regime' have now taken 8 British diplomats in the embassy 'hostage'. now,where is Kate Adie? its gonna all end in tears..[or tear gas]..good job there's no World Championship Snooker on the tv or i WOULD say that history is repeating itself |
7Innuendo7 28.06.2009 12:36 |
TQ --> it was so obvious, you already mentioned it? |
«¤~Mrš. BÃD GÛŸ~¤» 28.06.2009 13:01 |
JoxerTheDeityPirate wrote: seems i am ahead of the game with Iran as the 'regime' have now taken 8 British diplomats in the embassy 'hostage'. now,where is Kate Adie? its gonna all end in tears..[or tear gas]..good job there's no World Championship Snooker on the tv or i WOULD say that history is repeating itself Iran is a nation of kidnappers. I was under the impression that Tehran expelled two British diplomats and the United Kingdom was doing something similar. |
JoxerTheDeityPirate 28.06.2009 18:16 |
^yep,all true. its why i keep harking on about the original uprising with the Shah's exile in 1979/1980/81 or whenever it was because the exact same things happened then.the 'tit for tat' diplomatic expulsions,then the hostage taking and then the SAS storming the embassy with the BBC's Kate Adie interupting the snooker with a live report.Now im no Mystic Meg but i wouldnt be surprised in the least if something along these lines occur very soon.. |
«¤~Mrš. BÃD GÛŸ~¤» 28.06.2009 19:22 |
JoxerTheDeityPirate wrote: ^yep,all true. its why i keep harking on about the original uprising with the Shah's exile in 1979/1980/81 or whenever it was because the exact same things happened then.the 'tit for tat' diplomatic expulsions,then the hostage taking and then the SAS storming the embassy with the BBC's Kate Adie interupting the snooker with a live report.Now im no Mystic Meg but i wouldnt be surprised in the least if something along these lines occur very soon.. It was the Iran hostage crisis back in 79. It was American hostages then. I remember it although, I was allot younger at the time. I remember the hostages were released just before Reagan became president. They say history doesn't repeat itself, and hopefully it won't....who knows? |
JoxerTheDeityPirate 29.06.2009 05:41 |
«¤~Mrš. BÃD GÛŸ~¤» wrote:there was also the Iranian Embassy siege in London at around the same time which is what i am alluding to,the SAS ended storming the building from the balcony and shooting the terrorists and releasing the hostages all on live tv [bbc1],they cut away from the World Snooker Championships to cut to Kate Adie reporting from the scene,it also happened just after an Iranian sniper shot and killed unarmed policewoman Yvonne Fletcher in the Embassy area in LondonJoxerTheDeityPirate wrote: ^yep,all true. its why i keep harking on about the original uprising with the Shah's exile in 1979/1980/81 or whenever it was because the exact same things happened then.the 'tit for tat' diplomatic expulsions,then the hostage taking and then the SAS storming the embassy with the BBC's Kate Adie interupting the snooker with a live report.Now im no Mystic Meg but i wouldnt be surprised in the least if something along these lines occur very soon..It was the Iran hostage crisis back in 79. It was American hostages then. I remember it although, I was allot younger at the time. I remember the hostages were released just before Reagan became president. They say history doesn't repeat itself, and hopefully it won't....who knows? |
JoxerTheDeityPirate 29.06.2009 05:51 |
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_p4DmuGyehc&feature=PlayList&p=0F5036326A5309A5&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL&index=17 a warning for those of a nervous disposition that there is footage of a dead body being carried away on a stretcher at the beginning of this clip. the iranian embassy hostage crisis in London and SAS storming the premises |
thomasquinn 32989 29.06.2009 06:25 |
7Innuendo7 wrote: TQ --> it was so obvious, you already mentioned it? I was aware of it, as were, I think, most people with an interest in American/military history. Usually, commanders of task forces, territorial divisions and expeditionary operations are chosen for their background in the area of operations, as they are likely to be at least somewhat familiar with the terrain and the population, and may even have useful connections there. |
Micrówave 30.06.2009 11:19 |
«¤~Mrš. BÃD GÛŸ~¤» wrote:ThomasQuinn wrote: Oh, great. On the one side, we have the Mrs. Bad Guy-figure giving a good impression of a monkey slamming the 'Nuke' button, on the other we have Microwave being his regular obnoxious self, then there is YV who has taken out her blood-curdling political correctness act again, and fatty's too busy making fun of the non-recyclable parts of Michael Jackson to provide some comic relief here. And then, as if it isn't enough, there is a post claiming that there are two Zoners who think they have the absolute answer to everything, and I'm not in the list!!!Too be on the list Mr. Quinn you must earn it! If being my regular obnoxious self increases the intellegence on this thread, which it did, then my mission is accomplished. We're finally talking about the topic!!! Maybe you could learn something, TQ. Instead of obnoxiously attacking a post someone has made, try having something to back it up with. Notice how Barb has left the thread? Fatty has delivered. I've hurled a few softballs. And Mrs. Bad Guy hasn't hit the "Nuke-self" button yet. 4 out of 5 aint bad. I even have you talking about politics and you haven't called anyone a nazi yet!!! |
john bodega 02.07.2009 03:58 |
Speculation about Michael Jackson's funeral continues today! I like a world that has it's priorities in order. |
7Innuendo7 02.07.2009 13:20 |
In the interest of something somewhat resembling critical discourse...what seems most problematic about how the world outside Iran (USA, in my particular case) views the situation...is the lack of a 'big picture' effectively describing the cycles of violence creating the 1953-55 coup, the subsequent cultural changes as the Shah of Pahlivi attempted to Westernise/modernize, enforcing change through SAVAK secret police, and the resulting Islamic revolution of 1979. To wit: the July 1 2009 blog of Dr Alex Benzer on Huffington Post "Why the Mullahs are un-Iranian: 7 Fatal Flaws" suggests that "mullahs who think it's ok to shoot protesters indiscriminately are not God-fearing...they fear the loss of their own entrenched, illicit power...they have resorted to...ungodly acts...to preserve that power..." His most persuasive point is the use of the derisive term 'rishoo' for the long beard types in Iran, to illustrate the culture clash of personal style occurring in Teheran. AND Ervand Abrahamian's essay "Structural Causes of the Iranian Revolution" from the text Revolutions: Theoretical, Comparative, and Historical Studies (Goldstone, ed., 1986, isbn 0-15-576710-0), details the state imposition of guilds and licensing practices, to interrupt the established and cherished Iranian bazaar culture. In both instances the groups clinging to power create these boundaries between citizens and leaders that lead to violence, and given the seemingly less-than-representational nature of the recent Iranian election, the larger point here is drawing a connection to Lebanese elections as well, where political parties backed by Iran's Supreme Guardian Council leave little doubt that the region's instability is intricately linked with a popular desire for moderate, open, and representational government on one hand, and competing cultural values being rigidly enforced to encourage some kind of distinction from the West on the other. No need to cut off any appendages here, though. Hizbollah did not encourage Hariri's safety by any means. The Chatham Institute in UK recently published a survey showing greater than 100% voter participation in some rural areas of Iran. Who would have guessed the mullahs used the same script as JFK? |
Treasure Moment 21.08.2009 05:25 |
«¤~Mrš. BÃD GÛŸ~¤» wrote: No...it should of been "nuked" a long time ago! you do know that Freddie was an IRANIAN right? you fucking garbage creature |
Holly2003 21.08.2009 05:57 |
MrsBadGuy: that's a horrendous thing to say, totally shocking in this day and age. I mean, "should of"? What kind of idiot writes that. |
«¤~Mrš. BÃD GÛŸ~¤» 22.08.2009 22:22 |
-fatty- wrote: To quote one of my favourite fims "What we got hyah, is failure to 'municate"* Someone (let's call them Mrs Gad Buy) makes an ill-judged comment concerning a soloution to the problems in Iran. Along comes someone else (let's call them Bezonka12) who takes this comment seriously and chides Mrs Gad Buy for their staggering levels of ignorance on the subject. At this point it might have been wiser for Mrs Gad Buy to point out that her (or is it his?) remarks were not supposed to be taken literally and were probably made just to express her (or is it his?) frustration at what seems to be a hopeless situation. Chances are, Bezonka12 would nod his (or is it her?....No it's definately a him, he's got a moustache. Mind you so has my wife.) head and hark back to a similar situation in which his use of the word "Faggot" was taken seriously and he was branded a homophobe. Realising that the whole thing had been a bit of a mis-understanding, things would soon return to normal. Mrs Gad Buy and Bezonka12 would become bosom buddies, romance would blossom and within a month or two they would marry. Providing of course that Mrs Gad Buy is in fact a female. After all it's a well known fact amongst Queenzoners that Bezonka12 hates queers. Okay. Now that that's been sorted out I have a question of my own. Is it just me or does anyone else think that the holocaust never actually happened? fatty. *P.S It was Cool Hand Luke in case you're wondering. *sigh~let it be said again! |
ParisNair 09.09.2009 21:59 |
The accusatons are flying in Afghanistan now. Only difference is it is not a mass-movemnt involving the general public. |
Crazy LittleThing 10.09.2009 22:04 |
Treasure Moment wrote:Sorry, late to the party with this, TM, but iI think you'll find that Freddie and his family would say/would have said they are Persian.«¤~Mrš. BÃD GÛŸ~¤» wrote: No...it should of been "nuked" a long time ago!you do know that Freddie was an IRANIAN right? you fucking garbage creature |
Crazy LittleThing 10.09.2009 22:06 |
ThomasQuinn wrote:TQ: you never fail to amaze me with your knowledge and interests. Rock on!7Innuendo7 wrote: TQ --> it was so obvious, you already mentioned it?I was aware of it, as were, I think, most people with an interest in American/military history. Usually, commanders of task forces, territorial divisions and expeditionary operations are chosen for their background in the area of operations, as they are likely to be at least somewhat familiar with the terrain and the population, and may even have useful connections there. |