redspecialusa 04.09.2008 22:57 |
Hello everyone, I came across a most interesting debate on YouTube...and I wondered if any of the QZers wanted to get their two cents in. Here's the link. link |
teleman 04.09.2008 23:20 |
I prefer the Apples vs Oranges debate |
john bodega 04.09.2008 23:39 |
Brian isn't what you'd call 'perfect' live, but he's a damn sight better than our man Jimmy. I can't comment on their studio work because I've heard far more Queen than I have Led Zeppelin. I love 'em both, but Jimmy.... gnaaaah. |
kingogre 05.09.2008 02:56 |
Jimmy is so uneven live that it is unbelievable, Id take Brian just becuase of that. |
P-Staker 05.09.2008 03:13 |
redspecialusa wrote: Hello everyone, I came across a most interesting debate on YouTube...and I wondered if any of the QZers wanted to get their two cents in. Here's the link. linkThis is only a little more pointless than arguing politics on the internet. A personal taste is not a matter for arguing and neither side will be convinced anyway. |
GreatKingSam 05.09.2008 03:20 |
Both are legends, but - as is always said - you're more likely to get a Queen-sided answer from a Queen message board. However... ...Jimmy is, what - 64? - and Brian 61. By the look fo Jimmy Page and the way he almost appears to "struggle" to play the guitar these days (see their version of Rock N Roll on the new Foo's DVD), compared to the way Bri just steps out and does his thing, makes me pick Brian over Jimmy. Also, Jimmy Page just never seems to be really playing for the song, unlike something Brian has perfected over the years. Perhaps it was harder for Jimmy being outshined by Bonzo every day, whereas Bri and Rog always seemed a better team etc. |
Matias Merçeauroix 05.09.2008 03:56 |
Page can't play. Cheers, Hor |
Matias Merçeauroix 05.09.2008 03:59 |
He has HAND AIDS. Cheers, Hor |
Cwazy little thing 05.09.2008 05:54 |
The lack of respect for Jimmy Page here actually surprised me a lot! I expected most people to say Brian considering where we are, but not with such disregard for how good Page is. I think its a much closer call than anyone above has suggested. I also think that the VAST majority of people who arent Queen fans would say Jimmy Page. Having listened to plenty of Zep as well as tons of Queen Im going to say Brian because I simply prefer his tone, style and the way he uses the guitar, but Jimmy Page is an outstanding guitar player, who has influenced more guitarists in generations since than perhaps anyone else, and written some brilliant stuff - he was certainly never overshadowed by Bonzo if you ask me! |
its_a_hard_life 26994 05.09.2008 05:56 |
Brian May all the waaaaaaaay baby. |
john bodega 05.09.2008 07:24 |
Cwazy little thing wrote: he was certainly never overshadowed by Bonzo if you ask me!Thanks for the brain-fart. |
cmsdrums 05.09.2008 08:53 |
Jimmy Page is a great writer (or stealer in the case of a lot of Zep material!), and a great producer too. However he is not that brilliant a player, but hugely influential. Brain is all that Jimmy Page is on songwriting terms, production ability and influence, but can play a lot better too. Not dissing Jimmy Page, but Brian wins this one |
boca 05.09.2008 09:14 |
i don't like this kind of things... |
Knute 05.09.2008 09:29 |
Oh great. Guitarists from bands with two of the most obnoxious and belligerent fanbases on youtube. I don't even have to read one comment to know that it's probably one long flame war. |
Appolo Jupiter 05.09.2008 10:01 |
Jimmy Vs May :)) Come on. . . . Equal (nod). . . #1 Guitar players in Rock history: 1) Brian May 1) Jimmy Page 1) Ritchie Blacmore (There so Fkn equal) Plus there doin different stiles and so its impossible to tell whose better. . . (but Brian is better singer :p :megaloool: ) |
Holly2003 05.09.2008 10:04 |
Appolo Jupiter wrote: Jimmy Vs May :)) Come on. . . . Equal (nod). . . #1 Guitar players in Rock history: 1) Brian May 1) Jimmy Page 1) Ritchie Blacmore (There so Fkn equal) Plus there doin different stiles and so its impossible to tell whose better. . . (but Brian is better singer :p :megaloool: )Don't forget that dude out of Oasis. He's pretty good. |
john bodega 05.09.2008 10:06 |
Haha. No. Page is not equal to Blackmore. Hey fellas - have you heard the news? Why don't you watch the guitar solo in this video and tell me that Jimmy Page is as good at the playing side of things: link Jesus H Christ........ And don't anyone say 'he didn't rehearse' or 'he hadn't played with the band in years'. I don't want to hear it; I bought the Led Zeppelin DVD and it's got stuff just like this, from his heyday. Jesus...... |
kingogre 05.09.2008 10:09 |
Jimmy is a brilliant player with an amazing power in his tone, but he can be incredibly sloppy. Brian has also managed to develop himself and stay current for more than 30 years, Jimmy is still doing the same old the few times he picks up the guitar. Its extremely cool, but it is still the same as always. |
Appolo Jupiter 05.09.2008 10:17 |
Holly2003 wrote:Yea his good, but still not as good as this people. . . Well there are many great guitar players like Angus Young, David Gilmore, Yngwie Malmsteen and so further. But those gues listed up there where the gods, The Trinity of rock guitar history(As Mercury - Plant - Gillan in rock voice). They are the roots of all rock guitar stile's. . . I haven't listed Hendrix because in my opinion he was more bluesy rather then Rockie :P:P But thats just my opinion. It doesn't mean that I dont like him. I adore Hendrix.Appolo Jupiter wrote: Jimmy Vs May :)) Come on. . . . Equal (nod). . . #1 Guitar players in Rock history: 1) Brian May 1) Jimmy Page 1) Ritchie Blacmore (There so Fkn equal) Plus there doin different stiles and so its impossible to tell whose better. . . (but Brian is better singer :p :megaloool: )Don't forget that dude out of Oasis. He's pretty good. (but still Brian is better singer :megalol:) |
Nacho_itu 05.09.2008 10:21 |
It's a matter of taste, just that. I love them both. And certainly Jimmy CAN play ;) |
Appolo Jupiter 05.09.2008 10:27 |
kingogre wrote: Jimmy is a brilliant player with an amazing power in his tone, but he can be incredibly sloppy. Brian has also managed to develop himself and stay current for more than 30 years, Jimmy is still doing the same old the few times he picks up the guitar. Its extremely cool, but it is still the same as always.Why cant u understand that "sloopy" Is his stile. He plays rough on purpose, because it has much more bluesy and Zappish sound, Brian and Ritchie are more Classical Guitarists thats why they dont do the "sloppy" thing, Clean and classical stile fits much more their music, rather then the Page stile. It so very Zapish. The same thing is with Bonhem he played very bluesy not like either Paice(top speed stile) or Rodger(Hardcore Stile). Holp u understand :P |
teleman 05.09.2008 11:20 |
Apples are better. They are crunchy and you can find them at your local grocer. Anyone who says Aplles aren't better is a huge maroon. |
teleman 05.09.2008 11:23 |
I changed my mind. Apples suck. Oranges are juicy and have lots of Vitamin C. And they're easy to find at the local fruit market. They're sloppier than Apples but that's just the way they are. More people drink Orange juice than Apple juice. |
Raf 05.09.2008 12:49 |
I prefer Jimmy when it's about improvising on stage (except when his drug addiction got really bad). Brian was never able to play long solos without getting boring and repetitive, except maybe in the 77-79 era. But Brian is certainly better for all the rest. In the studio, it'd be cruel to compare Jimmy and Brian. Brian is a genius. Still, it's all a matter of taste. I personally see Brian as my biggest idol, both as a musician and as a guitarist, but I generally take Led Zeppelin live performances as references for me when I gotta improvise anything. Some people probably think Brian's live solos are more interesting than Page's, others probably think Page was better in the studio than Brian... We can't really pick better musicians, can we? Every person will have their own personal choices, and all we can do is respect those choices. |
masterstroke_84 05.09.2008 13:07 |
Your taste may said that Jimmy is your man... But the facts said that Brian, in all fields, is 100.000 better than Page, playing, composing, singing... in everything. Compare the work of Brian in Queen (and solo too), to Page's work... a lot of styles, always doing EVERYTHING perfect, every single note on his place, perfect sound, etc etc. And to finish... Page mimed at the olympics for that crappy tune... Brian played live, and perfect, god save the queen in a top of a palace... No-one can match that. Page sucks Brian is God... |
Matias Merçeauroix 05.09.2008 13:13 |
Page can't play. He sucks. SUCKS. Cheers, Hor |
Nacho_itu 05.09.2008 13:31 |
Jimmy can play, for sure ;) |
kingogre 05.09.2008 13:36 |
Appolo Jupiter wrote:Ive been a Zep-, Yardbirds-fan for years. I know his style and for the most part Im a big fan of it. As a guitarist he is definitely one of those who I try to take influence from as much as possible.:)kingogre wrote: Jimmy is a brilliant player with an amazing power in his tone, but he can be incredibly sloppy. Brian has also managed to develop himself and stay current for more than 30 years, Jimmy is still doing the same old the few times he picks up the guitar. Its extremely cool, but it is still the same as always.Why cant u understand that "sloopy" Is his stile. He plays rough on purpose, because it has much more bluesy and Zappish sound, Brian and Ritchie are more Classical Guitarists thats why they dont do the "sloppy" thing, Clean and classical stile fits much more their music, rather then the Page stile. It so very Zapish. The same thing is with Bonhem he played very bluesy not like either Paice(top speed stile) or Rodger(Hardcore Stile). Holp u understand :P But especially in live concerts he can be so incredibly sloppy that it is unbelievable. I dont know why really.. He seems to be a very strange person. But anyway I think you and I agree on a lot of things in this.:) |
masterstroke_84 05.09.2008 13:45 |
In the studio is sloppy too... He's so mediocre than even in the studio with all the time by his side, don't put the effort to do something right... The same goes to his "poll brother" Jimi Hendrix. |
MercuryArts 05.09.2008 13:59 |
This really is a pointless debate. They both have their strengths & weakneses. I love both of them. Queen will always get the nod because I have been listening to them longer. But Zep is right up there. An unchallenged second in my book. In the studio they were both amazing. Their rhythm work is outstanding, both of them. Jimmy ventured into more acoustic guitar than Brian did. Personally this is where Jimmy truly excells. Not necessarilly over Brian but I think its his most consistent strongpoint that has never wavered. Even through the heavy herion years of 77-80. I saw Jimmy play several times through the 80's & 90's. Those Page & Plant tours were outstanding. No one walked out of there feeling like he was sloppy in a not up to the task sort of way. The 88 reunion at the Atlantic records celebration was bad, yes. No question. I saw him a few months later on the Outrider tour & he was amazing. That night was a fluke. I know this sounds like I'm picking Page over May, but I am not. I am just defending one of my guitar heros. Brian can't play Zeps music & Jimmy can't play Queens music. Case & point! On a whole other topic, whoever it was that questioned Bonzo's ability over Roger's, forget it. No one could touch Bonham. Jonesy & Bonzo were the true "sonic volcano" No other bass & drummer tandem were more in sync than these two. |
Saif 05.09.2008 14:05 |
I think the matchup is plain stupid. Jimmy Page is better. Why? Because he was in Led Zeppelin. Brian wasn't, duh. Brian May on the other hand - I've never heard of him, sorry. So unless this petty Mayqueen guy was ever a part of Led Zeppelin, I don't think he's even worthy to lick Sir Page's boots. |
masterstroke_84 05.09.2008 14:10 |
Brian can't play that stuff?? hahahahah Not as bad... but he can, yes. And Page can't play the 95% of Brian's work, because he will need to born again... 5 times, and 3 of that lives will be used by him to try to even understand what Brian did in songs like The prophet's song, and a laaaaarge etcetera. |
Nacho_itu 05.09.2008 14:40 |
hahah, come on Masterstroke... think about it, and listen a little more ;). I love Brian, I love Jimmy, you can't compare them, they have diffrent stiles. Of course you don't like Jimmy's style, but what you said is just crap, heheh |
masterstroke_84 05.09.2008 14:57 |
Is not a matter of taste, and styles... is a matter of SKILLS... that rules every single thing on this world... SKILLS to do something good... or bad. Doesn't matter if im a Queen fan, skills are indisputable... there is a lot of "rules" if you like to call it that way, that defines wich is the better in something... is not about (I repeat) taste or style... And Brian is waaay better guitarrist than Page, because a lot of things involved in the technical things... hability... c'mon man, Page throw 20 notes and hit only 4. Not me, but a couple of people I know can easily point dozens of mistakes and bad perfomances in the Zep albums... and I challenge anyone to do the same with Brian... you will find just 2 or 3... in 40 years and more than 25 albums... and very little things... not that grose things that Page make. |
Saif 05.09.2008 15:02 |
On a serious note, though Page has been sucking majorly since 1977, he is much more influential than Brian, has written better tunes and plays...okay. I know people who play his tunes better, yet they lack the Zeppelin formula. From a neutral point of view, Brian May is the better guitarist. Big deal. Led Zeppelin are better anyway. John Bonham was the most talented member of Led Zeppelin, the others were good but not as good in their respective fields as Bonzo was. |
Nacho_itu 05.09.2008 15:13 |
But you can't say: "He's so mediocre than even in the studio with all the time by his side, don't put the effort to do something right..." because this makes me think that you didn't listened a lot of Zep. that's my point. I like both, and i'm not comparing them, i can't, they have different styles, brian live isn't sooo creative, he uses some things a lot, but...who cares :P. Of course, 1977 onwards Jimmy was so doped he couldn't almost play live, but thats another point. |
masterstroke_84 05.09.2008 15:26 |
Page has better tunes that Brian???? I give up. See ya. |
mickyparise 05.09.2008 15:53 |
Each had there own style, so I don't see how it can be a debate..... my top six would because of there unique style would be: Brian May David Gilmour Randy Rhoads Jimi Hendrix Jimmy Page Eric Clapton |
kingogre 05.09.2008 16:08 |
Jeff Beck anyone? Eddie Van Halen? And Blackmore is in a league on his own. |
Nacho_itu 05.09.2008 16:11 |
Good to see you give up with this. it's a matter of taste |
Matias Merçeauroix 05.09.2008 16:13 |
Page must die! Cheers, Hor |
The Real Wizard 05.09.2008 16:18 |
Sure, Page wasn't the cleanest player ever (especially when he was high and/or out of practice), and it did lead to some dreadful performances like that reunion in 1988 - but he was a great writer and producer. There are timeless gems on every Led Zeppelin album. Zeppelin weren't about technical musical perfection... although John Paul Jones surely was the unsung hero of the band with his abilities. There was an extra non-musical element that made them Led Zeppelin, which put them in a league of their own. Along with the music came this unspoken mystique. Epic compositions like In The Light and Achilles Last Stand can attest to that. This mystique furthermore allowed their music to come to life when they played live... as if the records were the music in the larval stage, growing its wings and blossoming in concert. After Robert Plant's son died in 1977, it seems the magic had greatly diminished, as the band would never sound the same again or carry that mystical aura around them... and it completely died with John Bonham in 1980. Everything after that, including the 90s Page/Plant collaboration and the 2007 reunion, consisted of great musicians... but no Hammer Of The Gods. But they remain perhaps the most influential rock band of all time (second only to The Beatles), and Page is most likely the most influential rock guitarist ever. However, in terms of straight technical ability in rock... Terry Kath, Steve Howe, Jeff Beck, Davey Johnstone, Adrian Belew, Mick Ronson, and Frank Zappa could take most of the guys mentioned in this thread to the cleaners. As far as I'm concerned, Steve Howe is the whole package, and Frank Zappa's guitar was an extension of his brain, a brain which is almost completely unrivaled to this day... one of the greatest composers of the last century. But the talents of the most brilliant ones are beyond the grasps of the average listener, which is why they are rarely mentioned in discussions like this. |
kingogre 05.09.2008 16:31 |
Technically Id say Steve Vai and Joe Satriani has taken it as far as it can go, even if other people have been more influential. My top-bet for best rock guitarist ever would actually be Keith Richards though. Hes got a certain groove and intensity in his playing that no one else really has. |
MercuryArts 05.09.2008 16:56 |
Sir GH wrote: Sure, Page was a great writer and producer. There are timeless gems on every Led Zeppelin album. Zeppelin weren't about technical musical perfection... although John Paul Jones surely was the unsung hero of the band with his abilities. There was an extra non-musical element that made them Led Zeppelin, which put them in a league of their own. Along with the music came this unspoken mystique. Epic compositions like In The Light and Achilles Last Stand can attest to that. This mystique furthermore allowed their music to come to life when they played live, growing its wings and blossoming in concert. After Robert Plant's son died in 1977, it seems the magic had greatly diminished, as the band would never sound the same again or carry that mystical aura around them... and it completely died with John Bonham in 1980. But they remain perhaps the most influential rock band of all time (second only to The Beatles), and Page is most likely the most influential rock guitarist ever. However, in terms of straight technical ability in rock... Terry Kath, Steve Howe, Jeff Beck, Davey Johnstone, Adrian Belew, Mick Ronson, and Frank Zappa could take most of the guys mentioned in this thread to the cleaners. Frank Zappa's guitar was an extension of his brain, a brain which is almost completely unrivaled to this day... one of the greatest composers of the last century. But the talents of the most brilliant ones are beyond the grasps of the average listener, which is why they are rarely mentioned in discussions like this.Very well said GH! This should put an end to this topic. |
teleman 05.09.2008 18:06 |
What are you talking about Sir GH(Bob, still doing WWRY at the Panasonic?) It is still apples and oranges. Terry Kath is more like a Mango. Steve Howe is an Eggplant WTF. Jeff Beck is a huge talent like a watermelon. Adrian Belew eats bananas. Frank Zappa is pure garlic. And what about Keef, he's fermented. Clearly I have a hard time taking any of this seriously. Insulting somebody's creativity/musical skill because somebody dared compare them to someone you idolize is just nutty(and not in a good way like pecans in a pie) It's all subjective and is not a competition. Now I'll take my leave and go get something to eat. |
Appolo Jupiter 05.09.2008 18:50 |
masterstroke_84 wrote: Is not a matter of taste, and styles... is a matter of SKILLS... that rules every single thing on this world... SKILLS to do something good... or bad. Doesn't matter if im a Queen fan, skills are indisputable... there is a lot of "rules" if you like to call it that way, that defines wich is the better in something... is not about (I repeat) taste or style... And Brian is waaay better guitarrist than Page, because a lot of things involved in the technical things... hability... c'mon man, Page throw 20 notes and hit only 4. Not me, but a couple of people I know can easily point dozens of mistakes and bad perfomances in the Zep albums... and I challenge anyone to do the same with Brian... you will find just 2 or 3... in 40 years and more than 25 albums... and very little things... not that grose things that Page make.Come on people were talking about Brian May and Jimmy Page not couple of worms. The side that prefers Brian discusses Jimmy as a peace of crap and so does the other discussing Brian as a crap. Were talking abouut two living gods, geniuses and not simple mortals like each and every one of us. It so anti human to say thigs like that about Jimmy or either Brian. "He sounds sloppy, he cant play this or that". In my opinion we mustnt call either guitaris a bad one just because we dont like them as theve passed the most difficult test in the world, I mean the Time Test. Centuries from now there wont be either u or me, but they will still remain, they are the new Beethovens, Chopins and Bachs of our time. And one more thing that really pisses me off is when somebody says that Jimmy can't play, all u who say things like that really r very far from music. Jimmy is The best Guitar player along with Brian and Blackmore!!! |
vadenuez 05.09.2008 18:53 |
masterstroke_84 wrote: Brian can't play that stuff?? hahahahah Not as bad... but he can, yes. And Page can't play the 95% of Brian's work, because he will need to born again... 5 times, and 3 of that lives will be used by him to try to even understand what Brian did in songs like The prophet's song, and a laaaaarge etcetera.I reckon Brian's got himself his own Treasure Moment. |
Appolo Jupiter 05.09.2008 19:13 |
O yah and one more thing for those wwho say that Page sucks and he could write things like Brian did. Let me tell u three words "Stairway to Heaven". The guitar intro is a real art work of a true genius. Will I be right if say that May sucks because he hadnt wrote the most famous into in the world???(Irs a fact that SWTH intro is The mos recognizable intro int the world as the Smoke On The Water Rifd) No. But Brian has his great intro on the song Friends Will Be Friends. . . Both were unique and am asking not to say such things about either one of them. Please it's a real sin, u all will burn in hell fore those words :P Just because u're Queen fans it doesnt mean that u must say things about other guitarists. . . |
Bo Alex 05.09.2008 20:21 |
I think Brian is more melodic, JImmy is more powerfull. I prefer Brian, but like Jimmy a lot. |
Raf 05.09.2008 20:25 |
masterstroke_84, if Brian is better for being more accurate and stuff, then forget about Brian Wussie May and let's talk about Steve Vai, Jason Becker... Why do you even bother listening to Queen? I'm quite sure Brighton Rock Solo from the LAWS DVD can't beat any Steve Vai song, and not even the fastest bits from Was It All Worth It can be compared to Jason Becker's Serrana. Music isn't about "playing every note correctly". It's about expressing yourself and communicating with other people. Page wasn't very clean, Page often made small "mistakes", Page can't play anything too fast - but lots of people identified with his music. Lots of people, myself included, have a perfect Led Zep song for each occasion, from moments of extreme happiness to moments of sadness, anger. Just like many people can relate to Queen music that same way. And just like some other people can relate to many, many other guitarists. Music is a matter of taste, period. You can try to compare two musicians to find out which of them is more technically proeficient at playing a certain instrument, which of them has sold more albums, which of them has written more complex stuff - but not which of them is BETTER. |
Matias Merçeauroix 05.09.2008 20:50 |
Music is not a matter of taste. It's about expressing things, if you like. How can you express or transmit an idea if you can't fucking play what you want to play? Music is about transmiting an idea... with certain ways, methods, tools... whatever. Even if not "idea transmition" is intended, the work is still done with those methods and tools. And most of the time, what matters most is the way you play or sing a song. If you play like fuck, it doesn't matter if you wrote the anthem of mankind, it's still played like fuck. Not all people can tell something rhythmially complicated... from Jimmy Page. Page is crap. He has turds for fingers, that's why he sounds like shit. Taste is a matter of taste. That's why I like to listen to Queen one day and Alan Parsons Project another day. It's not a matter of trying to find the most amazingly played song, I don't think anybody does that. You can "ignore" some things, (mistakes) but you'll always know they're there, because you think one or two mistakes can't ruin a great song where the rest is great. Like in My Melancholy Blues. Freddie sings a few nots a bit out of tune but, on the other hand, the song is quite hard to sing in the way he does. So I wouldn't say THIS IS SHIT, IT'S OUT OF TUNE because the overall merit is much bigger than a very few notes out of tune. The same with Bijou. A few notes are pitchy but overall the song is great and a few notes a tiny bit off don't ruin the work. But Page's mistakes are not mistakes, they're BLOODY UNHOLY BLACK HOLES in the songs. It's gross. And wherever there isn't a mistake the guitar parts are still played sloppy. Jonesy is great and so is Bonzo, both great musicians. But Page is not. Not even close. Cheers, Hor |
The Real Wizard 05.09.2008 22:03 |
teleman wrote: still doing WWRY at the Panasonic?Yessir. It is still apples and oranges.Absolutely... I didn't explicitly say so, but of course I acknowledge that. Despite our beloved Horsie's sentiments, in the end music comes down to one's personal taste and what resonates within them. Not everyone is a musician, so I'm afraid the majority wins. Without the listeners, you wouldn't need us. Frank Zappa is pure garlic.Ha... hilarious. |
john bodega 05.09.2008 22:16 |
I don't get why people keep telling me that his '88 debacle was a fluke. For crying out loud, there's stuff just like that on the Led Zeppelin DVD!!! Not all of the way through... but it's like this; whenever he starts to ad-lib, he takes that same lick from the Heartbreaker solo and tries to do it ten times faster than he should, and it sounds awful. And I mean there are some great moments on those discs, even from Page. The Albert Hall show is full of evidence that his fingers are in no way made of turds. If I go with my gut, I honestly can't say that Page is in the same league as Brian when it comes to playing, but that's because Brian probably doesn't try to go beyond his abilities when he plays live. I mean we've all done that... "here it comes I'm going to shred OH fuck I screwed up". Everyone has limits and if you try to go too far beyond them, you will sound like crap. I don't think Plant and Page should be ignored as a force on stage, though. link Look at them. Gods of rock and roll; how can anyone say any different? |
redspecialusa 05.09.2008 23:07 |
In all honesty, I for one am more than sick and tired of hearing the Jimmy Page worship. They are similar in some ways and yet they aren't at all in most ways (apples and oranges). I'm over people saying Page is the 'greatest.' Bull-fucking shit. And to specifically hear that Brian sucks compared to him really boils my blood. Personal attacks don't bother me a bit...but I do love a good debate and I WILL not be moved in my position in saying that I believe Brian is clearly better. Brian could spank Jimmy Page every day of the week w/ a Matinee on Wednesday and Sunday. I doubt Jimmy Page ever dreamed of creating anything close to what Brian did on "Good Company." Zappa is mind-blowing, and the other guys that SirGH mentioned are great too. I'm not sure if I'm re-iterating or not but what about Hendrix?? He's one of Brian's most profound influences. As well as Clapton. Robin Trower? And that's not even getting deeper into rock, or into blues, metal, etc. |
kingogre 06.09.2008 03:21 |
Some of the old blues and country guys are just killer aswell. |
Holly2003 06.09.2008 09:35 |
Everybody can play Stairway or Kashmir. Only Led Zep created Stairway and kashmir. So knock off the "Page is rubbish" crap. When you create something as good, then your opinion might mean something. Until then, you're just another internet nobody, criticising someone who has achieved everything you dream of but can't accomplish. ps Brian is better. pps Blackmore is betterer ;) |
kingogre 06.09.2008 10:40 |
I do agree that it is somewhat tiresome to always have the same old guitarists appear in these discussions. There are so many great and original guitarplayers out there in so many different styles that it feels rather limiting to say the least. |
7Innuendo7 06.09.2008 14:18 |
Jimmy Page is Keyser Soze AND the man behind the curtain! pay no attention to the man behind the curtain! Brian rules |
Saif 08.09.2008 14:26 |
WTF, Alaska!?
Sir GH wrote: Sure, Page wasn't the cleanest player ever (especially when he was high and/or out of practice), and it did lead to some dreadful performances like that reunion in 1988 - but he was a great writer and producer. There are timeless gems on every Led Zeppelin album. Zeppelin weren't about technical musical perfection... although John Paul Jones surely was the unsung hero of the band with his abilities. There was an extra non-musical element that made them Led Zeppelin, which put them in a league of their own. Along with the music came this unspoken mystique. Epic compositions like In The Light and Achilles Last Stand can attest to that. This mystique furthermore allowed their music to come to life when they played live... as if the records were the music in the larval stage, growing its wings and blossoming in concert. After Robert Plant's son died in 1977, it seems the magic had greatly diminished, as the band would never sound the same again or carry that mystical aura around them... and it completely died with John Bonham in 1980. Everything after that, including the 90s Page/Plant collaboration and the 2007 reunion, consisted of great musicians... but no Hammer Of The Gods. But they remain perhaps the most influential rock band of all time (second only to The Beatles), and Page is most likely the most influential rock guitarist ever. However, in terms of straight technical ability in rock... Terry Kath, Steve Howe, Jeff Beck, Davey Johnstone, Adrian Belew, Mick Ronson, and Frank Zappa could take most of the guys mentioned in this thread to the cleaners. As far as I'm concerned, Steve Howe is the whole package, and Frank Zappa's guitar was an extension of his brain, a brain which is almost completely unrivaled to this day... one of the greatest composers of the last century. But the talents of the most brilliant ones are beyond the grasps of the average listener, which is why they are rarely mentioned in discussions like this.Goddamnit...well said! Although I never really liked JPJ, you're right about the other guys. Frank Zappa's "Stairway" is awesome and I love his song "I Ain't Got No Heart".(But I hate "Valley Girl"). BTW Zebonka, that was hilarious. |
john bodega 09.09.2008 03:04 |
Holly2003 wrote: When you create something as good, then your opinion might mean something.Ugh. I'm glad most people don't follow this logic. We wouldn't have forums, otherwise. |
Holly2003 09.09.2008 10:10 |
Zebonka12 wrote:You say that like it's a bad thing.Holly2003 wrote: When you create something as good, then your opinion might mean something.Ugh. I'm glad most people don't follow this logic. We wouldn't have forums, otherwise. |
john bodega 09.09.2008 11:32 |
Holly2003 wrote: You say that like it's a bad thing.Yeah, I do. It might be a shithole here but one decent discussion in every fifty shitty ones is still worth bothering with! What I still don't understand about these topics is decidedly non-creative people wagging their fingers at everyone else and telling them what they have a right to talk about. Obviously I've missed something here! |
knakenrudi 09.09.2008 11:50 |
Sir GH wrote: Sure, Page wasn't the cleanest player ever (especially when he was high and/or out of practice), and it did lead to some dreadful performances like that reunion in 1988 - but he was a great writer and producer. There are timeless gems on every Led Zeppelin album. Zeppelin weren't about technical musical perfection... although John Paul Jones surely was the unsung hero of the band with his abilities. There was an extra non-musical element that made them Led Zeppelin, which put them in a league of their own. Along with the music came this unspoken mystique. Epic compositions like In The Light and Achilles Last Stand can attest to that. This mystique furthermore allowed their music to come to life when they played live... as if the records were the music in the larval stage, growing its wings and blossoming in concert. After Robert Plant's son died in 1977, it seems the magic had greatly diminished, as the band would never sound the same again or carry that mystical aura around them... and it completely died with John Bonham in 1980. Everything after that, including the 90s Page/Plant collaboration and the 2007 reunion, consisted of great musicians... but no Hammer Of The Gods. But they remain perhaps the most influential rock band of all time (second only to The Beatles), and Page is most likely the most influential rock guitarist ever. However, in terms of straight technical ability in rock... Terry Kath, Steve Howe, Jeff Beck, Davey Johnstone, Adrian Belew, Mick Ronson, and Frank Zappa could take most of the guys mentioned in this thread to the cleaners. As far as I'm concerned, Steve Howe is the whole package, and Frank Zappa's guitar was an extension of his brain, a brain which is almost completely unrivaled to this day... one of the greatest composers of the last century. But the talents of the most brilliant ones are beyond the grasps of the average listener, which is why they are rarely mentioned in discussions like this.Well said, and next to that, good that you mention Davey Johnstone. I think that guitarist is very underrated, yet very talented. |
Matias Merçeauroix 09.09.2008 14:30 |
Holly2003 wrote: Everybody can play Stairway or Kashmir. Only Led Zep created Stairway and kashmir. So knock off the "Page is rubbish" crap. When you create something as good, then your opinion might mean something. Until then, you're just another internet nobody, criticising someone who has achieved everything you dream of but can't accomplish.Who says criticising someone is a sign of frustration? Page sucks. I think his songs also suck. That's not because I envy him. Why would I? I honestly think he sucks as a musician. I admire people who can do things right. Not people like Page. Cheers, Hor |
Sebastian 10.09.2008 07:52 |
I think Brian's a much better guitarist than Jimmy, especially if we put together the different areas involved (single-note, chords, soloing, acoustic, guitar-choirs). I mean, I like Jimmy's multi-tracked guitars, but Brian took it further, I prefer 'Procession' or 'God Save the Queen' over 'The Song Remains the Same', although I like them all. |
Yara 10.09.2008 08:36 |
I totally agree with Bad Horsie. And I'd like to say that what I quote here below is probably the brightest stuff I've read on Queenzone when it comes to music. It's so aptly put that it should be permantently placed on the articles section of the website.
That was just great, Bad Horsie. I agree with every single line, I'd just not put the more graphic strong wording there, not my style (hehehe), but that doesn't matter.
It's because of things like these I like this forum so much.
Take care you all.
Bad Horsie wrote: Music is not a matter of taste. It's about expressing things, if you like. How can you express or transmit an idea if you can't fucking play what you want to play? Music is about transmiting an idea... with certain ways, methods, tools... whatever. Even if not "idea transmition" is intended, the work is still done with those methods and tools. And most of the time, what matters most is the way you play or sing a song. If you play like fuck, it doesn't matter if you wrote the anthem of mankind, it's still played like fuck. Not all people can tell something rhythmially complicated... from Jimmy Page. Page is crap. He has turds for fingers, that's why he sounds like shit. Taste is a matter of taste. That's why I like to listen to Queen one day and Alan Parsons Project another day. It's not a matter of trying to find the most amazingly played song, I don't think anybody does that. You can "ignore" some things, (mistakes) but you'll always know they're there, because you think one or two mistakes can't ruin a great song where the rest is great. Like in My Melancholy Blues. Freddie sings a few nots a bit out of tune but, on the other hand, the song is quite hard to sing in the way he does. So I wouldn't say THIS IS SHIT, IT'S OUT OF TUNE because the overall merit is much bigger than a very few notes out of tune. The same with Bijou. A few notes are pitchy but overall the song is great and a few notes a tiny bit off don't ruin the work. But Page's mistakes are not mistakes, they're BLOODY UNHOLY BLACK HOLES in the songs. It's gross. And wherever there isn't a mistake the guitar parts are still played sloppy. Jonesy is great and so is Bonzo, both great musicians. But Page is not. Not even close. Cheers, Hor |
April 11.09.2008 15:59 |
Certainly Brian May is better, but be objective - Jimmy is very good. Anybody concerned with music will say it. |
Matias Merçeauroix 11.09.2008 16:29 |
No, he's not. Cheers, Hor |
April 12.09.2008 14:35 |
Just because he's Zep and not Queen? |
Matias Merçeauroix 12.09.2008 16:12 |
No, because he sucks. If he had been in Queen, I wouldn't be a Queen fan at all. I would still have my beloved Electric Light Orchestra. Cheers, Hor |
jedi83 14.09.2008 01:42 |
The two are very hard to compare.Page is a blues man at heart,while Brian is a much better technical player.What put Brian over Page in my book is innovation.The sounds,the textures and the down right strange tones Brian could get out of the Red Special were mind blowing.I only got to see Queen once,on the Hot Space tour.It was my first concert and I haven't sen to many shows that can compare.I think only Rush and Queensryche were equal to Queen live. |
April 14.09.2008 14:44 |
Bad Horsie wrote: No, because he sucks. If he had been in Queen, I wouldn't be a Queen fan at all. I would still have my beloved Electric Light Orchestra. Cheers, HorThen your dislike is real. And does ELO still play? It's a very old band... |
Matias Merçeauroix 15.09.2008 12:58 |
April wrote:ELO is dead since 1983. There have been a few attempts to bring it back to life but Jeff Lynne made sure to ruin each and every one.Bad Horsie wrote: No, because he sucks. If he had been in Queen, I wouldn't be a Queen fan at all. I would still have my beloved Electric Light Orchestra. Cheers, HorThen your dislike is real. And does ELO still play? It's a very old band... Jeff Lynne fired all band members. Then those band members got together and released 2 records as ELO PART II, which were pretty good. Then Jeff Lynne sued them for the name rights... whatever. He didn't have the full rights, just a third part. Then Bev Bevans, the original drummer that was playing in ELO PART II, sold his rights to Jeff Lynne and left the band... Then Jeff Lynne released ZOOM, where he plays almost all of the instruments. But it's one of the crappiest efforts ever made. He tried to show that HE was ELO but failed miserably. Now he just produces Tom Petty's records... Bob Dylan's. He's like a living dead. A very sad story. Cheers, Hor |
Poo, again 15.09.2008 15:45 |
I'll take Jimmy over Brian any day. |
April 15.09.2008 16:07 |
Thanks, Bad Horsie, for the information! I remember Jeff Lynne worked with George Harrison on George's Cloud 9 album. The album is great! I like it very much! George Harrison is super too, but no doubt Brian May is a better guitarist, isn't he? |
kingogre 15.09.2008 16:25 |
Didnt he work on Brainwashed aswell? Great album. Jeff Lynne was very successful as a producer, for a while it seemed like every veteran rocker sounded like a mixture between ELO and Tom Petty.;) |