Treasure Moment 18.03.2007 16:10 |
They should put a freddie statue inside the church instead :D freddie was god, jesus was a punk |
deleted user 18.03.2007 16:22 |
Who cares about church ? I mean, except for people that go there. If they want to take the time to care, it doesn't matter to me what they do there unless they're having heathen sacrifices or something. |
Smitty 18.03.2007 16:31 |
<font color=red>The Audacity of Charles wrote: Who cares about church ? I mean, except for people that go there. If they want to take the time to care, it doesn't matter to me what they do there unless they're having heathen sacrifices or something.Amen. :-D |
SomebodyWhoLoves 18.03.2007 16:47 |
Oh please! Freddie was a great singer, and musician, but he is not comparable to Jesus Christ! That's a gross blasphemy! Why don't you retards create your Freddie religion, and wear a T-Shirt with Freddie's face. And people will think you are crazy! |
Poo, again 18.03.2007 17:00 |
SomebodyWhoLoves wrote: Oh please! Freddie was a great singer, and musician, but he is not comparable to Jesus Christ! That's a gross blasphemy! Why don't you retards create your Freddie religion, and wear a T-Shirt with Freddie's face. And people will think you are crazy!... |
Nathan 18.03.2007 17:09 |
Weird topic. |
NTL 18.03.2007 17:24 |
SomebodyWhoLoves wrote: Oh please! Freddie was a great singer, and musician, but he is not comparable to Jesus Christ! That's a gross blasphemy! Why don't you retards create your Freddie religion, and wear a T-Shirt with Freddie's face. And people will think you are crazy!So you dont think that people who believe in all that Jesus stuff and go to church are crazy ? |
jkdrummerboy 18.03.2007 17:31 |
Atheist- you are a fucking piece of SHIT who doesn't deserve to live!!!! |
Freya is quietly judging you. 18.03.2007 17:43 |
Nathan wrote: Weird topic. |
Treasure Moment 18.03.2007 18:12 |
I mean freddie was the ultimate human being, loving,caring, greatest voice of all time, best songs ever made, greatest frontman and human being and he spread more love than jesus could ever do and he did it across all boundries and religions. Religion is man made lies and only causes wars,pain,false hope and a limited life. |
Treasure Moment 18.03.2007 18:14 |
SomebodyWhoLoves wrote: Oh please! Freddie was a great singer, and musician, but he is not comparable to Jesus Christ! That's a gross blasphemy! Why don't you retards create your Freddie religion, and wear a T-Shirt with Freddie's face. And people will think you are crazy!and you christians arent retarded and crazy believing in a story book of lies and wearing a cross around your neck? its like wearing some torture symbol. THAT is crazy |
deleted user 18.03.2007 18:17 |
Why not live and let live ? If someone disagrees with your religious views, who gives a shit ? I think people who are aggressively Atheist are as bad as aggressively Super-Religious people. I like my stance of "I don't care". It works a lot better than being pissed off at people all the time. |
Treasure Moment 18.03.2007 18:18 |
sure i agree but you have to admit that religion is bad thing that destroys peoples lifes |
Adolfo and the spiders from Mercury 18.03.2007 18:41 |
this is insulting, I respect the fact that u dont believe in Jesus, but I do, and you should be a part of society and respect other people religion. |
Adolfo and the spiders from Mercury 18.03.2007 18:43 |
oh and one more thing, people like u, r the ones that destroy peoples lifes, discriminating and insulting |
squidbits 18.03.2007 18:49 |
I personally think that everyone should accept everyone else's beliefs. Everyone should just accept everyone for who they are!If someone wants to make a relegion out of Queen, or anything else for that matter, let them! It's their choice and they shouldn't be criticized for their choices in life. I'm starting to sound like a fortune cookie now :) |
Treasure Moment 18.03.2007 18:57 |
jkdrummerboy wrote: Atheist- you are a fucking piece of SHIT who doesn't deserve to live!!!!oh did i hurt your feelings retard? |
jkdrummerboy 18.03.2007 19:56 |
hello again you fucking piece of SHIT.If you think you hurt my feelings you must be fucking reterted!!! You are nobody in my eyes and I wouldn't even waste my spit on you!!! Once again you are a fucking piece of SHIT who doesn't deserve to LIVE... |
FriedChicken 18.03.2007 20:38 |
Freddie was a buttfucker |
jkdrummerboy 18.03.2007 20:44 |
Im not gonna even bother with you fried. |
Mercuryking 18.03.2007 20:51 |
jkdrummerboy wrote: hello again you fucking piece of SHIT.If you think you hurt my feelings you must be fucking reterted!!! You are nobody in my eyes and I wouldn't even waste my spit on you!!! Once again you are a fucking piece of SHIT who doesn't deserve to LIVE...Your a garbage creature. |
Gr8 King Rat 18.03.2007 21:17 |
Atheist wrote: sure i agree but you have to admit that religion is bad thing that destroys peoples lifesNo, its idiots like you that are fucking up this world. A world without faith is NOT a good thing. I'm seeing it right here in my own country. More and more people are turning away from God, and this country is going to hell in a handbasket. |
Treasure Moment 18.03.2007 21:47 |
Gr8 King Rat wrote:you sir are an idiot, you dont need some childrens story book telling you how to live your life, if you have a brain and common sense thats more than enoughAtheist wrote: sure i agree but you have to admit that religion is bad thing that destroys peoples lifesNo, its idiots like you that are fucking up this world. A world without faith is NOT a good thing. I'm seeing it right here in my own country. More and more people are turning away from God, and this country is going to hell in a handbasket. |
Treasure Moment 18.03.2007 21:48 |
jkdrummerboy wrote: hello again you fucking piece of SHIT.If you think you hurt my feelings you must be fucking reterted!!! You are nobody in my eyes and I wouldn't even waste my spit on you!!! Once again you are a fucking piece of SHIT who doesn't deserve to LIVE...lol yeah i didnt hurt your feelings at all as you are bascially exploding over there you stupid idiot haha |
deleted user 18.03.2007 22:03 |
Honestly. What is the point in arguing about religion ? It FAITH. Give it a rest. I don't care what you believe or not. Just be nice people and don't eat your neighbour (unless he's a Cadbury Creme). |
magicalfreddiemercury 18.03.2007 22:11 |
<font color=red>The Audacity of Charles wrote: Just be nice people and don't eat your neighbour (unless he's a Cadbury Creme).Or a Banana Malomar. Mmmm. Yum. Seriously - to quote a great man - "The ills of the world done man to man pale when compared to those done by religion." ~ Ben Franklin |
Saif 18.03.2007 22:59 |
SomebodyWhoLoves wrote: Oh please! Freddie was a great singer, and musician, but he is not comparable to Jesus Christ! That's a gross blasphemy! Why don't you retards create your Freddie religion, and wear a T-Shirt with Freddie's face. And people will think you are crazy!Fucking die, you Jesus-molesting grave digger.(no offence to the Christians here, but this guy is a fucking retard, he's faking it all) |
redspecial85 19.03.2007 00:01 |
Atheist wrote:Athiest,SomebodyWhoLoves wrote: Oh please! Freddie was a great singer, and musician, but he is not comparable to Jesus Christ! That's a gross blasphemy! Why don't you retards create your Freddie religion, and wear a T-Shirt with Freddie's face. And people will think you are crazy!and you christians arent retarded and crazy believing in a story book of lies and wearing a cross around your neck? its like wearing some torture symbol. THAT is crazy You should really do your homework a little better on the reasoning behind Christian faith, if you're such an expert on the subject of faith and religion, why don't you back all that trash talk up with some common sense and intelligence? True Christianity is about having a relationship w/ God...its not about persecuting people, its about setting people free, among other great things. Its the "religious fanatics" here in Western Society, who have gone around accusing and condemning people; those people have given Jesus a bad rap. It INFURIATES ME!!! Those people aren't TRUE CHRISTIANS!!! These fanatics and the damned media have painted a very bad picture of Christianity. I simply don't see how one could create a religion around Freddie Mercury. As a writer, musician, and performer...he's had a tremendous influence on me. But Freddie Mercury wasn't Jesus Christ. I love Queen's music but I don't worship them... Before WWII, any discussion among educated people reguarding Israel becoming a sovereign state again was quite a joke among people in positions of authority. Biblical prophecy said it would happen. They were occupied and slapped around for almost 3000 years under the yoke of the Persians, the Romans, and the Byzantine Empire (among several others). And to the shock and suprise of the international community; in 1948, Israel became its own sovereign nation. Look it up...Do your research, and call me out on it if I'm wrong. The prophecy about Israel is in the book of Revelation. I joined this site to discuss and enjoy one's company involving my favourite band, Queen. I don't come on this site to have my Lord attacked by people!! I will not stand by and take this!! I pity all of you who don't know Jesus...I hope and pray you all come to know him so you can have freedom, peace, and joy in this sick and twisted world. |
The prophet's song 19.03.2007 04:33 |
*blink* sweet knights of columbus what on earth is going on here! Debates over if evolution happened or not or the existance of dinosaurs I can handle, but this is crazy! |
Rick 19.03.2007 04:39 |
Well, Jesus had nails in his hands/feet and Freddie liked to nail. |
NTL 19.03.2007 07:49 |
Gr8 King Rat wrote:Can you please explain why a world without faith would not be a good thing ? And why you think faith makes the world a better place.Atheist wrote: sure i agree but you have to admit that religion is bad thing that destroys peoples lifesNo, its idiots like you that are fucking up this world. A world without faith is NOT a good thing. I'm seeing it right here in my own country. More and more people are turning away from God, and this country is going to hell in a handbasket. Whether you like it or not, people who belive in that nonsense are simply insecure and are terrified of death so turn to God because it helps them deal with it, thinking they will end up in heaven. When will people realise that you live then you die and you are no more. Freddie Mercury is NOT burning in hell because he was gay, he is dead and no longer exists, full stop. I think I can safely say that the world WOULD be a better place without faith and the quicker everyone else realises this the better. I think everyone, belivers and non belivers should go away and read 'The God Delusion' by Richard Dawkins and have your minds opened a little. |
Mercuryking 19.03.2007 08:43 |
NTL wrote:Now here is a smart person, couldnt have said it better myself.Gr8 King Rat wrote:Can you please explain why a world without faith would not be a good thing ? And why you think faith makes the world a better place. Whether you like it or not, people who belive in that nonsense are simply insecure and are terrified of death so turn to God because it helps them deal with it, thinking they will end up in heaven. When will people realise that you live then you die and you are no more. Freddie Mercury is NOT burning in hell because he was gay, he is dead and no longer exists, full stop. I think I can safely say that the world WOULD be a better place without faith and the quicker everyone else realises this the better. I think everyone, belivers and non belivers should go away and read 'The God Delusion' by Richard Dawkins and have your minds opened a little.Atheist wrote: sure i agree but you have to admit that religion is bad thing that destroys peoples lifesNo, its idiots like you that are fucking up this world. A world without faith is NOT a good thing. I'm seeing it right here in my own country. More and more people are turning away from God, and this country is going to hell in a handbasket. Religion is only for weak people and DOES more bad than good. Separates people from eachother. |
Treasure Moment 19.03.2007 09:21 |
ThomasQu?nn wrote: Freddie seems like a god to a lot of people - however anyone's life could be made really interesting and sad when they die - just add a bit of sad music to a video clip etc. Take your own life - i'm sure most people have fantastic memories of childhood and adulthood. Freddie had the same, only he's are captured on film. All perceptions. That's it. There's nothing godlike about him, or anyone. Take brian may - he's a fantastic guitarist, yet if you look back what he did it's nothing. He moves his hands on a piece of wood. Just mimic him playing the guitar - that's what he's done all his life - move his fingers around (just on a physical level here). See there's nothing amazing about anyone when you think like that. ALso take a funeral - people cry, yet why do they do this? Probably because there is an emotional piece of music being played. Imagine if there was an upbeat song being played - bet the reaction would be totally different - life is all about perceptions - we just create the rest. Now you know i'm correct - it sucks. But that's life.you are wrong, freddie wasnt like anybody else and there will never be anyone as good as him again |
Saif 19.03.2007 09:26 |
Mercury SingerOfLife wrote:Ehh...okay, while I do agree with all the points you people have raised against religion, I think it's best not to discuss it at all or if absolutely necessary, then use the Personal forums. Most people here are religious and probably will be offended, and religious discrimination is not a liberal thing to do either. Even though I believe in freedom of speech, it'll just result in one getting pummeled by the majority of the people which sadly is one of the reasons Religion is rarely discussed in public debates as something like that will incite violence and cause unrest among faithful followers of Christianity, Islam, Judaism, etc....NTL wrote:Now here is a smart person, couldnt have said it better myself. Religion is only for weak people and DOES more bad than good. Separates people from eachother.Gr8 King Rat wrote:Can you please explain why a world without faith would not be a good thing ? And why you think faith makes the world a better place. Whether you like it or not, people who belive in that nonsense are simply insecure and are terrified of death so turn to God because it helps them deal with it, thinking they will end up in heaven. When will people realise that you live then you die and you are no more. Freddie Mercury is NOT burning in hell because he was gay, he is dead and no longer exists, full stop. I think I can safely say that the world WOULD be a better place without faith and the quicker everyone else realises this the better. I think everyone, belivers and non belivers should go away and read 'The God Delusion' by Richard Dawkins and have your minds opened a little.Atheist wrote: sure i agree but you have to admit that religion is bad thing that destroys peoples lifesNo, its idiots like you that are fucking up this world. A world without faith is NOT a good thing. I'm seeing it right here in my own country. More and more people are turning away from God, and this country is going to hell in a handbasket. |
its_a_hard_life 26994 19.03.2007 09:53 |
<font color=blue>Rick wrote: Well, Jesus had nails in his hands/feet and Freddie liked to nail.You bad bad boy! :-D Hehe. |
FVBVA 19.03.2007 10:14 |
i agree with atheist.Long live the FFRF.roger is an atheist too i think.the question is did god create human or did human create god.fredddie is not god,freddie is freddei,his name is bigger than the god |
eenaweena 19.03.2007 11:06 |
uhm... although your stuff may be valid, i don't think that it's right to say this in such a blasphemous way, without even considering the fact that there are christians on this site. so, if i were you, i would just keep this opinion personal so as to not stir up a fight with the christians. it is offending to them you know. it's not in the right folder, let alone is it the right way to address your belief. what i mean is you should at least be considerate to the christians and catholics in the forum. if you don't like the religion, then fine. just don't mock the christians and catholics and their beliefs in an inappropriate site. :) |
Mr.Jingles 19.03.2007 11:25 |
This just shows that some atheists (not all of them) are just about fucked up in the head as religious fundamentalists. The lack of tolerance and respect for the beliefs of others truly sickens me. |
eenaweena 19.03.2007 11:27 |
Mr.Jingles wrote: This just shows that some atheists (not all of them) are just about fucked up in the head as religious fundamentalists. The lack of tolerance and respect for the beliefs of others truly sickens me.a big AMEN to that. :D |
louvox 19.03.2007 11:59 |
<font color=red>The Audacity of Charles wrote: Who cares about church ? I mean, except for people that go there. If they want to take the time to care, it doesn't matter to me what they do there unless they're having heathen sacrifices or something.Why don't you change your underwear? |
deleted user 19.03.2007 15:18 |
louvox wrote:I only find it necessary to change my undergarments on the socially acceptable "every morning" schedule as I've attained a fine measure of bladder and bowel control that some of you here seem to be lacking.<font color=red>The Audacity of Charles wrote: Who cares about church ? I mean, except for people that go there. If they want to take the time to care, it doesn't matter to me what they do there unless they're having heathen sacrifices or something.Why don't you change your underwear? Your non-sequitur response is what is called a "loaded question" - and pretty pointless. My question at least had the intent of conveying, "If you are an atheist, why do you care so much about what fucking statue is in someone else's religious building ?" Your question was about as pointless and base as if I asked you, say... "Why haven't you removed the stick that was shoved up your ass as a child ?" If you're really 45, you should have a bit more maturity to throw around and be able to participate in an honest conversation or debate without acting like a socially deficient twelve-year-old. |
squidbits 19.03.2007 16:38 |
I'VE HAD ENOUGH!!! EVERYONE STOP INSULTING EACH OTHER!!! I know it's not my problem and all, but I hate to have people fight! I DOUBT THIS THREAD WAS SUPPOSED TO TURN EVERYONE AGAINST EACH OTHER!! |
louvox 19.03.2007 16:43 |
When your done throwing your child like fit over my responce I reccomend pour your self your favorite beverage, get on your knees and pray to "Freddie" that he saves you a place in hell next to him. |
squidbits 19.03.2007 17:38 |
I am sorry for the caps, I was just saying that perfectly nice, mature people shouldn't be insulting and critsizing each other. Is that too much to ask? |
deleted user 19.03.2007 17:50 |
louvox wrote: When your done throwing your child like fit over my responce I reccomend pour your self your favorite beverage, get on your knees and pray to "Freddie" that he saves you a place in hell next to him.I have at least clearly addressed what I find to be ridiculous in your "arguments". If you find this child-like, I think children are a fair deal better off than people such as yourself. If you wish to argue that atheists and non-religious people should, for some reason, have a say in what happens in church, please do so. I would never pray to Freddie. He was a man, not some kind of higher power. I don't think his statue should be worshipped. So, I forgive you if you were mistaking me for someone else. If English is not your native language, I forgive you for not being able to understand that what I quite clearly meant was that if you are not a religious person, and want nothing to do with religion, it's not up to you what statue someone should have in their church. squidbits wrote: I am sorry for the caps, I was just saying that perfectly nice, mature people shouldn't be insulting and critsizing each other. Is that too much to ask?I don't find anything mature in a person asking "Why don't you change your underwear ?" to someone whose message was "CAN'T WE JUST LIVE AND LET LIVE ?" If a "grown-up" individual was behaving this way towards children or even other adults on the street, I would hope that this would not be acceptable behaviour or considered "perfectly nice". |
squidbits 19.03.2007 18:00 |
I say we should drop this thread or at least this topic of maturity/immaturity etc. |
deleted user 19.03.2007 18:16 |
I'm all for it. That's what I meant by my first post. : / I guess some people just misunderstood that. |
Mercuryking 19.03.2007 18:20 |
ThomasQu?nn wrote: Freddie seems like a god to a lot of people - however anyone's life could be made really interesting and sad when they die - just add a bit of sad music to a video clip etc. Take your own life - i'm sure most people have fantastic memories of childhood and adulthood. Freddie had the same, only he's are captured on film. All perceptions. That's it. There's nothing godlike about him, or anyone. Take brian may - he's a fantastic guitarist, yet if you look back what he did it's nothing. He moves his hands on a piece of wood. Just mimic him playing the guitar - that's what he's done all his life - move his fingers around (just on a physical level here). See there's nothing amazing about anyone when you think like that. ALso take a funeral - people cry, yet why do they do this? Probably because there is an emotional piece of music being played. Imagine if there was an upbeat song being played - bet the reaction would be totally different - life is all about perceptions - we just create the rest. Now you know i'm correct - it sucks. But that's life.Ive researched about that , Music one of if not the most important thing there is. You are right, music gives the feelings , but you are wrong in saying freddie aint no more special than the rest, u know why? Freddie is the one creating those sad tunes that creates the feelings, without freddie they wouldnt have been there. So therefore he is special , VERY special and to me inhuman. With his voice and talent. |
Drummer imense! 19.03.2007 18:54 |
It's not fair to come on here and critisize other peoples religions or, indeed, non religions. This is not a place for conversion or to say other people are stupid for what they beleive is right. I mean WARS have been fought over less then this topic! So perhaps i should suggest that everyone grows up a bit hmmm. |
Leaky Luke 19.03.2007 18:58 |
I thought an atheist didn't believe in any sort of higher power or greater human being? I could be wrong though... |
Pancake House 19.03.2007 19:18 |
I don't get it. |
skiqueen 19.03.2007 21:29 |
ive read this extensive thread and its really intimidating! anyway, i dont like super religious people, because they sometimes blow things out of proportion and such, and they focus too much on their god and too little on their life and what is around them. i believe though, that faith and a religion are needed, so your life has a set of rules and obligations to follow. i just really hate it though, when people blame God for things like september 11th and others say things like 'Where's your god NOW?!?' hes out of your life, thats where, right where you want him to be. i dont think freddie would like to be worshipped. idolized, yes, but to a certain extent. i hope i havent caused any trouble! :) |
rockyracoon 19.03.2007 23:26 |
If I were at a well-attended meeting (let's say 300 people attending a lecture in an auditorium) and Freddie were to walk in, I would STAND to honor the world's greatest performer, the great vocalist, the genius composer, and the man whose music, to this day, leaves me in awe. On the other hand, if Jesus Christ were to walk into the same auditorium.......................I would kneel. |
SomebodyWhoLoves 20.03.2007 00:19 |
wow. very well said racoon. That is so true. If I saw Freddie, I'd be excited, and clapping my hands. If I saw Jesus, I'd tremble, and bow. |
Mercuryking 20.03.2007 01:39 |
rockyracoon wrote: If I were at a well-attended meeting (let's say 300 people attending a lecture in an auditorium) and Freddie were to walk in, I would STAND to honor the world's greatest performer, the great vocalist, the genius composer, and the man whose music, to this day, moves the depths of my soul and frequently brings tears to my eyes. On the other hand, if Jesus Christ were to walk into the same auditorium.......................I would kneel.No offence , but you my friend are a sheep. How can you say that you give Jesus more respect when you never really actually know if he is more special than you and i. You have never witnessed any supposed miracles or whatever , only thing you have is a fairytale in a book. Freddie on the otherhand was real and made some fantastic things. Freddie walks in, i give him all respect in the world, Jesus walk in, tell him to serve the real human God ,Freddie. |
Elizabeth Knightson 20.03.2007 06:53 |
Yeah, I was gonna say. At least we can be a 100% sure Freddie existed and achieved something incredible. Although we have the proof Jesus did exist, the rest is pure belief. If I ever was to worship someone, I'd choose Freddie (At least no-one was killed in his name, not that I know) |
eenaweena 20.03.2007 09:55 |
okay, fine. i'm trying to, in the least biased way, to tel all of you to at least RESPECT the catholics and christians' beliefs. it's important to them, so you should at least have some morsel of respect, not mock them like truckers! this is absolutely insane! you guys must be older than me, but you act juvenile when you talk about these rather sensitive topics. i love freddie and i have tremendous respect for him, but seriously, people. this is WAY overboard. you guys can start a religion and whatever. but you can't really replace jesus, can you? if you do then you're making another religion so don't involve church or jesus in this whole... whatever thing. you can just say... i'm atheist and i don't believe in jesus, i'd rather worship freddie mercury. just... don't insult some people's beliefs. ps: i love Jesus and God more than i love freddie. got a problem with that? |
theCro 20.03.2007 10:23 |
Atheist, you've posted the most devil - stupid - idot post in the history of writing [computer or any other] and you deserve to burn in hell. How can you even compare JESUS and FREDDIE... what a moron you are. |
NTL 20.03.2007 10:23 |
<font color="indigo"><b>friedchicken \m/ wrote: ps: i love jesus and God more thean i love freddie. got a problem with that?Not really, but I just cant belive we are living in the 21st century and we still have people like you beliving in this nonsence and stopping us moving forward, its annoying to the point of being absolutely hilarious. The good thing about religeous people is that it makes me feel superior, so thanks for that. And just to add on, scientific research shows that Athiests are in general more intelligent than religeous believers. |
magicalfreddiemercury 20.03.2007 10:36 |
<font color="indigo"><b>friedchicken \m/ wrote: ps: i love jesus and God more thean i love freddie. got a problem with that?Isn't "jesus" supposed to be capitalized? |
eenaweena 20.03.2007 11:13 |
NTL wrote:hey, i wasn't stopping anyone from anything... and you're GENERALIZING. i'm not amish or anything and i live like you guys do. go ahead and call me stupid or "less superior or whatever. i'm still the same person with equal dignity as the atheists, jews, moslems, etc.<font color="indigo"><b>friedchicken \m/ wrote: ps: i love jesus and God more thean i love freddie. got a problem with that?Not really, but I just cant belive we are living in the 21st century and we still have people like you beliving in this nonsence and stopping us moving forward, its annoying to the point of being absolutely hilarious. The good thing about religeous people is that it makes me feel superior, so thanks for that. And just to add on, scientific research shows that Athiests are in general more intelligent than religeous belivers. oh. and in what ways are atheists more intelligent than religious people? can you cite specific examples and instances where this applies? and why should religion be an aptitude for intelligence? it's not always that religion gets in the way of rationality, you know. maybe extremists, fine. but generalizing the other religious believers with the extremists somewhat insults me. and i don't see why being a catholic in a free Queenzone community makes me less superior. it's insulting to be called less superior just because you believe in something. |
eenaweena 20.03.2007 11:14 |
magicalfreddiemercury wrote:woops, my bad. thanks for telling me! i edited my post already. i was in a rush. -.-'<font color="indigo"><b>friedchicken \m/ wrote: ps: i love jesus and God more thean i love freddie. got a problem with that?Isn't "jesus" supposed to be capitalized? |
Nathan 20.03.2007 12:21 |
There is nothing wrong in either believing in God or not believing in God. What is wrong is trying to convince people to change what they believe (as far as this thread goes, that means believers) through degradation and insults is extremely infantile. And what has this REALLY got to do with Queen anyway? And Atheist, do you remember vivial? (Freddie Mercury was a VERY evil man! Where is he now? Hell!) I would like to have seen your response had you been around when he/she was posting. |
Treasure Moment 20.03.2007 12:36 |
theCro wrote: Atheist, you've posted the most devil - stupid - idot post in the history of writing [computer or any other] and you deserve to burn in hell. How can you even compare JESUS and FREDDIE... what a moron you are.you are a fucking stupid low creature |
Mercuryking 20.03.2007 14:13 |
<font color="indigo"><b>friedchicken \m/ wrote:Atheists are more intelligent because they dont fall for these stupid fairytales that is told to people. They are smarter cause they think for themselves , not just believing a book. They are smarter cause they can accept that maybe life is not more than this.NTL wrote:hey, i wasn't stopping anyone from anything... and you're GENERALIZING. i'm not amish or anything and i live like you guys do. go ahead and call me stupid or "less superior or whatever. i'm still the same person with equal dignity as the atheists, jews, moslems, etc. oh. and in what ways are atheists more intelligent than religious people? can you cite specific examples and instances where this applies? and why should religion be an aptitude for intelligence? it's not always that religion gets in the way of rationality, you know. maybe extremists, fine. but generalizing the other religious believers with the extremists somewhat insults me. and i don't see why being a catholic in a free Queenzone community makes me less superior. it's insulting to be called less superior just because you believe in something.<font color="indigo"><b>friedchicken \m/ wrote: ps: i love jesus and God more thean i love freddie. got a problem with that?Not really, but I just cant belive we are living in the 21st century and we still have people like you beliving in this nonsence and stopping us moving forward, its annoying to the point of being absolutely hilarious. The good thing about religeous people is that it makes me feel superior, so thanks for that. And just to add on, scientific research shows that Athiests are in general more intelligent than religeous belivers. Now i believe those who created religion are very smart people and i think they are athiests. |
fightingdove 20.03.2007 14:13 |
NTL wrote: The good thing about religeous people is that it makes me feel superior, so thanks for that. And just to add on, scientific research shows that Athiests are in general more intelligent than religeous belivers.I just did some research of my own and found out that religious people are better spellers, though |
skiqueen 20.03.2007 16:57 |
NTL wrote:...because people like einstein are really stupid.....<font color="indigo"><b>friedchicken \m/ wrote: ps: i love jesus and God more thean i love freddie. got a problem with that?Not really, but I just cant belive we are living in the 21st century and we still have people like you beliving in this nonsence and stopping us moving forward, its annoying to the point of being absolutely hilarious. The good thing about religeous people is that it makes me feel superior, so thanks for that. And just to add on, scientific research shows that Athiests are in general more intelligent than religeous belivers. *thats sarcasm. its hard to express when all you have are letters.* |
NTL 20.03.2007 18:15 |
fightingdove wrote:Ok Ill give you that, btw I do know how to spell Atheist, just a slip.NTL wrote: The good thing about religeous people is that it makes me feel superior, so thanks for that. And just to add on, scientific research shows that Athiests are in general more intelligent than religeous believers.I just did some research of my own and found out that religious people are better spellers, though But Religion as you spell it, I believe is actually spelled 'EVIL'. |
deleted user 20.03.2007 18:31 |
Firefox spell-checker : Works for people of all faiths or lack thereof ! |
skiqueen 20.03.2007 19:10 |
by the way, freddie mercury had a religion, you know, he just didnt practice it. did you just miss that little detail or what? |
Mr.Jingles 20.03.2007 19:34 |
skiqueen wrote: by the way, freddie mercury had a religion, you know, he just didnt practice it. did you just miss that little detail or what?Freddie worshiped cocks. |
its_a_hard_life 26994 20.03.2007 20:40 |
Mr.Jingles wrote:LMAO. :Dskiqueen wrote: by the way, freddie mercury had a religion, you know, he just didnt practice it. did you just miss that little detail or what?Freddie worshiped cocks. |
Smitty 20.03.2007 21:17 |
I LOVE this thread. I could read it constantly for 5 hours and still love it. |
sparrow 21754 20.03.2007 21:21 |
this is ridiculous.... |
sparrow 21754 20.03.2007 22:21 |
<font color="indigo"><b>friedchicken \m/ wrote: okay, fine. i'm trying to, in the least biased way, to tel all of you to at least RESPECT the catholics and christians' beliefs. it's important to them, so you should at least have some morsel of respect, not mock them like truckers! this is absolutely insane! you guys must be older than me, but you act juvenile when you talk about these rather sensitive topics. i love freddie and i have tremendous respect for him, but seriously, people. this is WAY overboard. you guys can start a religion and whatever. but you can't really replace jesus, can you? if you do then you're making another religion so don't involve church or jesus in this whole... whatever thing. you can just say... i'm atheist and i don't believe in jesus, i'd rather worship freddie mercury. just... don't insult some people's beliefs. ps: i love Jesus and God more than i love freddie. got a problem with that?well said, my friend. its incredibly insulting to call our religions 'fairy tales'. i have my faith, and strongly believe in it. its fine to have your own opinion, but DO NOT INSULT SOMEONES INTELLIGENCE OR FAITH, BECAUSE SOMEONE THINKS DIFFERENTLY, AND THAT GOES FOR ALL BELIEVERS AND NON BELIEVERS. i don't care if some of you are atheists or believers, thats fine, thats what you do/dont believe, but this is disgusting. its angering me to no end, so ill stop before i get really mean. i can make a religious joke and not feel like i need to apologize, but this is beyond....stupid in lack of better words. on so many cases. i hope this thread gets deleted. and see? no name calling on my part. id like to think i contributed to some degree of maturity in this thread. as for the topic starter, i have no comment. i don't personally believe in what the atheists believe, as you said before friedchicken, but as long as they have a valid point and don't insult the believers, they're entitled to their opinion. i personally don't agree with it, and they don't have to agree with me, thats fine. i think if we all just kept it at that, life would be nicer, otherwise the topic starter and a couple others are no better than the fundamentalist religious people. i think i made my point. |
eenaweena 20.03.2007 22:40 |
Mercury SingerOfLife wrote:to YOU these are fairy tales. where's the respect here? and i still don't see why religion is an aptitude for intelligence. the points given are not substantial, nor is it a fact. it is your opinion. and the only thing that could probably give a person's aptitude of intelligence are IQ tests or your school tests themselves and whatnot.<font color="indigo"><b>friedchicken \m/ wrote:Atheists are more intelligent because they dont fall for these stupid fairytales that is told to people. They are smarter cause they think for themselves , not just believing a book. They are smarter cause they can accept that maybe life is not more than this. Now i believe those who created religion are very smart people and i think they are athiests.NTL wrote:hey, i wasn't stopping anyone from anything... and you're GENERALIZING. i'm not amish or anything and i live like you guys do. go ahead and call me stupid or "less superior or whatever. i'm still the same person with equal dignity as the atheists, jews, moslems, etc. oh. and in what ways are atheists more intelligent than religious people? can you cite specific examples and instances where this applies? and why should religion be an aptitude for intelligence? it's not always that religion gets in the way of rationality, you know. maybe extremists, fine. but generalizing the other religious believers with the extremists somewhat insults me. and i don't see why being a catholic in a free Queenzone community makes me less superior. it's insulting to be called less superior just because you believe in something.<font color="indigo"><b>friedchicken \m/ wrote: ps: i love jesus and God more thean i love freddie. got a problem with that?Not really, but I just cant belive we are living in the 21st century and we still have people like you beliving in this nonsence and stopping us moving forward, its annoying to the point of being absolutely hilarious. The good thing about religeous people is that it makes me feel superior, so thanks for that. And just to add on, scientific research shows that Athiests are in general more intelligent than religeous belivers. and if the atheists did create religion, then that makes them non-atheist, rather, religious believers. i haven't been isulting the non-believers here! or maybe i have, just tell me if i have then i'll just take this back but i don't see why there is so much disrespect for the people who have a religious faith. why can't all of you guys just accept that there are those with faiths and respect it? you treat people like me as if we were scumbags roaming the streets trying to change everyone in sight. heck i'm not even trying to change what you believe in! i'm just saying that it's not right to outright disrespect those with faiths. people with faiths are not lesser people. they are the same as all people are. and yes, i still don't see why this has anything to do with Queen. |
The Real Wizard 21.03.2007 16:30 |
SomebodyWhoLoves wrote: Oh please! Freddie was a great singer, and musician, but he is not comparable to Jesus Christ! That's a gross blasphemy! Why don't you retards create your Freddie religion, and wear a T-Shirt with Freddie's face. And people will think you are crazy!I bet more people would still think you're the crazy one, Mr. Fundamentalist. At least they would have a tangible reason for forming their clique. redspecial85 wrote: Before WWII, any discussion among educated people reguarding Israel becoming a sovereign state again was quite a joke among people in positions of authority. Biblical prophecy said it would happen. They were occupied and slapped around for almost 3000 years under the yoke of the Persians, the Romans, and the Byzantine Empire (among several others). And to the shock and suprise of the international community; in 1948, Israel became its own sovereign nation. Look it up...Do your research, and call me out on it if I'm wrong. The prophecy about Israel is in the book of Revelation.What nonsense... it wasn't biblical prophecy. The Hebrew prophets weren't writing to "predict the future". The prophets were simply writing poetically, as a reaction to what was happening at the time. Christianity just decided to twist around the Hebrew scriptures to match their social and political agendas while writing their gospels and forming their new religion in the late first century. You mentioned Revelation, which is not a prophetic book. Scholars have been studying it for centuries, and still there is no consensus as to what it's saying. Besides, at the time Revelation was written (which was well after the gospels), the Christian-Jewish hatred was very strong, so clearly no Christian scriptures from this time period would ever support Judaism in any way. On the topic of Judaism in Christian scriptures, it's worth mentioning that some of the Christian scriptures are very anti-semitic documents. The gospel of John is one fine example, as is the story of Judas. Judas was simply created as a scapegoat to shift the blame of Jesus' death from Pilate to the Jews (note the aforementioned growing hostility between Christians and Jews). Paul, who wrote before the gospel stories were written, says Jesus came back to the 12 - but if the Judas story is correct, then it would be 11. Both stories can't be right! This is the true root of today's antisemitism, and so few people see it... either because they don't care enough about Christianity to analyze the scriptures, or they're so caught up in it that they refuse to accept something that doesn't support their tradition. As for Isreal... it became its own state in 1948 because of WWII, and the subsequent pressure on the UN, mostly from the Zionists... among other reasons related to WWII which I won't elaborate on, simply because most people will label anyone who asks (even informed) questions about the historical accuracy of the holocaust as antisemitic. I pity all of you who don't know Jesus...Take your preaching somewhere else. I'm definitely open to having an intelligent discussion about history, but we definitely don't need you or anyone else saying there is something wrong with people who don't agree with your beliefs. |
AmeriQueen 21.03.2007 18:36 |
<font color=red>The Audacity of Charles wrote: Who cares about church ? I mean, except for people that go there. If they want to take the time to care, it doesn't matter to me what they do there unless they're having heathen sacrifices or something.I do. I care deeply about churches. Afterall, shouldn't mankind's greatest enemy be watched and feared? Religion: The disease of humanity. |
redspecial85 22.03.2007 00:09 |
Sir GH... I respect the fact that someone such as yourself has given some interesting responses to what I said previously in this thread of discussion. If you look back to the Gospels, you'll see that Judas was replaced after his death, so there were 12 that Jesus came back to. The book of Revelation is looked back on as a poem, but more so as a prophetic poem. Yes there was a desire among the Jewish communtity in the first century for Israel to become a nation again; it was revealed to John that in the last days it would happen. Also for the record, I was preaching for a bit in there...but please don't misunderstand what I'm saying and assume things. I never said, "there's something wrong with you people who aren't Christians." I'm not an accuser, I don't condemn anyone for their lifestyle; nor do I believe to be better than anyone else. I'm still human. We all have free will to do whatever we please. |
The Real Wizard 22.03.2007 00:28 |
redspecial85 wrote: If you look back to the Gospels, you'll see that Judas was replaced after his death, so there were 12 that Jesus came back to.Ah yes, that's the usual response. But that still doesn't make it less clear that the Judas story was added in later. Why didn't Paul have anything to say about it? In fact, he had nothing to say about the virgin birth, childhood, miracles, crucification story, and resurrection appearances. In his writings, he has about three or four biographical things to say about Jesus. This is because they hadn't come up with the stories yet. Christianity was in its extreme youth when Paul wrote. These above things all came later (after the year 70) when they needed to fill in the blanks. That's where the gospels come in. Since the writers were Jewish, they took elements from the Hebrew scriptures and created their own. Anyone who looks hard enough - without their spiritual blinders on - is able to see this. But if you're believing that the gospels are historically accurate as they're written, then you'll never see how the gospels are actually literary treasures, not history. The book of Revelation is looked back on as a poem, but more so as a prophetic poem.I agree with the poetry part, but nobody knows what it means. Plenty of people who have good memorization skills and good intentions tend to play expert in the field of religion, but the truth is, very few people know what they're talking about on the subject. Traditional interpretations of scripture are rarely the historically correct ones. Yes there was a desire among the Jewish communtity in the first century for Israel to become a nation againThis is true. It took about 1800 years for it to happen again, and only because they threw everyone else out. it was revealed to John that in the last days it would happen.Sure, you can believe that if you'd like, but when reading scripture, or any other ancient writing, you must understand how they came to be. Scrolls and papyrus didn't just fly out of the sky, and the writers weren't divinely inspired. People had political, religious, and social agendas for writing as they did. You have to ask: who wrote it, when was it written, why did they write it, who were the writing to, were they responding to another writing, what was happening at the time (socially, politically) that might have inspired the writing, etc. This is called historical criticism. Any credible historian uses this method when examining any ancient writing, but a major exception is usually made when it comes to religion. The gospels were written between 40-70 years after Jesus died. That's a lot of time for stories to be running around in an oral culture. Remember, most people back then were illiterate, and couldn't write their thoughts and stories down. A new religious movement needed to grow to the point that scribes would be required (and interested), and so it took decades for word to spread before any of it was written down. Just think of the telephone game going on for 40 years. And then there's the translation. They were all written in ancient Greek, which had no spaces between words, no punctuation, and no difference between upper and lower case letters. No two manuscripts of any particular writing match. The entire Christian tradition has been the result of arguably the biggest guessing game ever played. I bet they haven't told you all that in church... but your minister probably knows it. If they told you this stuff, the church would be dying even quicker than it already is. Also for the record, I was preaching for a bit in there...but please don't misunderstand what I'm saying and assume things. I never said, "there's something wrong with you people who aren't Christians." I'm not an accuser, I don't condemn anyone for their lifestyle; nor do I believe to be bett |
unknown 22.03.2007 08:33 |
I think that everyone should have his/her own view on religion since everyone of us has his/her own interpretation of the world: For someone God can mean love, hope, understanding,... ...for someone other a higher force, a certain power or energy... ...or God as the reason of our existence... ...or God as the reaction between our body and soul... ...or as our ability to realize... ...or as gnosis... ...or the absolute amount of everything in the world... etc. etc. etc. ...the same with religion... We are only hurting each other if we are trying to prove something which is not bound on objectivity. I think everyone should find his/her own personal 'truth' and accept the 'truth' of the others. |
The Real Wizard 22.03.2007 13:54 |
Fantastic post, Daria. Such beautiful and wise words... words that will fly over the heads of most. Personally, I no longer give any merit to the "God question". Anyone with objectivity is aware that religion has divided people throughout history far more than it has united them. To me, the question should be irrelevant until we have ensured that everyone in this world is fed, clothed, sheltered, and healthy... not to mention learning to love one another. These are not religious practices. These are basic fundamental ways of being. After that has been established, then we can discuss which invisible man in the sky (or which interpretation of) is more important than the other, and which ancient fables are actually true, historically or metaphorically. |
thomasquinn 32989 22.03.2007 14:00 |
SomebodyWhoLoves wrote: Oh please! Freddie was a great singer, and musician, but he is not comparable to Jesus Christ! That's a gross blasphemy! Why don't you retards create your Freddie religion, and wear a T-Shirt with Freddie's face. And people will think you are crazy!Some blaphemy a day, now keep the inquisition away From me |
thomasquinn 32989 22.03.2007 14:03 |
jkdrummerboy wrote: hello again you fucking piece of SHIT.If you think you hurt my feelings you must be fucking reterted!!! You are nobody in my eyes and I wouldn't even waste my spit on you!!! Once again you are a fucking piece of SHIT who doesn't deserve to LIVE...Oh boy, how nice. A religious nut. Did you know that Jesus was either not immaculately conceived or female? |
Sweetie 22.03.2007 17:20 |
I like Jesus |
Sweetie 22.03.2007 17:22 |
SomebodyWhoLoves wrote: Oh please! Freddie was a great singer, and musician, but he is not comparable to Jesus Christ! That's a gross blasphemy! Why don't you retards create your Freddie religion, and wear a T-Shirt with Freddie's face. And people will think you are crazy!I'm not crazy, If anything, I'm getting more and more sane >:D |
Treasure Moment 22.03.2007 21:34 |
you religious people should buy a brain and start thinking logically and wake up and see through the bullshit lies. We are just animals and thats a FACT. Human is 99% genetically like an ape, hard to get this into your head? |
redspecial85 22.03.2007 22:35 |
Interesting points again Sir GH...I was well aware of most of your points. I've taken several classes on Judaism and Christianity. If I'm not mistaken I believe there was a council held among "elders" of the church in the late first Century where they assembled texts that combined the Tanakh with the new "scriptures." The interpretation of any scripture, even the question of what Translation of the Bible is most accurate? Either way, that's usually where a lot of the fighting begins. Its sad, that a lot of my brothers and sisters in faith can't step out of their carnality and look at things from an eternal perspective. There is a lot of good that Christians are doing in this world...AIDS relief, and missionary work in Africa, India, even in their homeland by looking after the poor, the homeless, widows, and the broken-hearted. But somehow, its overshadowed by its controversies. I can't say that my faith has been shaken by this at all, if anything; you've reminded me of several perspectives that have dimmed in my mind. "Faith is the substance of things hoped for," and "Faith without works is dead." Honestly that's where the struggle is...striving to "walk by faith." To believe even though I may not always see him. I've seen more than enough to know he's there, and that he is very much alive and involved in what's going on. I still believe. It was good to have such an intellectually stimulating discussion with you, SirGH. I look forward to talking with you again...Peace...:) |
The Real Wizard 22.03.2007 23:39 |
redspecial85 wrote: There is a lot of good that Christians are doing in this world...AIDS relief, and missionary work in Africa, India, even in their homeland by looking after the poor, the homeless, widows, and the broken-hearted. But somehow, its overshadowed by its controversies.This is very true. Funny how most of the core Christian philosophies are left-wing, from a political perspective... but it's the ultra-conservative ones who have the loudest voices and get the most attention. It's pretty unfortunate. Careful with praising the missionaries... they are very often told not to lift a finger until they've converted whoever they're supposed to be helping. "Faith without works is dead."Ah yes... good 'ol James strikes again! Quality wisdom there. It was good to have such an intellectually stimulating discussion with you, SirGH. I look forward to talking with you again...Peace...:)Same goes to you.. :) |
Ready_Coddie 23.03.2007 06:03 |
Jesus is Freddie's bitch, he sucks Freddie's cock on a regular basis in heaven amen |
Treasure Moment 23.03.2007 07:21 |
Ready_Coddie wrote: Jesus is Freddie's bitch, he sucks Freddie's cock on a regular basis in heaven amenLOL |
Maz 23.03.2007 11:22 |
With the exception of a few posters, this thread is nothing but a bunch of kids trying to outcool each other by slamming Christianity ("ooooh, I just said that Jesus sucks Freddie's cock, I'm a badass"). If you are really as intelligent as you all claim, then why the need to denigrate others for their faith? You say that religion is the greatest problem in the world, yet you all are the ones picking the fight. Are you even capable of rational debate or just crass insults? |
rockyracoon 23.03.2007 12:17 |
It disgusts me that Queen fans can be so divided on this issue. Didn't Freddie sing "This Can Be Heaven for Everyone"? The crassness of many of the atheists on this forum has made me question whether I want to be associated with other Queen fans. |
Saif 23.03.2007 12:38 |
There's not much purpose of this thread in the Queen general discussion forum anyway since this has become a religious battle(and it was like that from the start)...maybe this should be moved to personal?
Atheist wrote: you religious people should buy a brain and start thinking logically and wake up and see through the bullshit lies. We are just animals and thats a FACT. Human is 99% genetically like an ape, hard to get this into your head?[offtopic]A even a grain of wheat and just about any person off the street have more than 30% of their DNA in common. =P The 30% is mostly composed of disabled, non-coding repetitive sequences in the DNA called pseudogenes. And let's not forget junk DNA... Bonobos and humans are the ones which analytically have 98% of their DNA in common, not just any "ape"...The lesser apes are even more distant, something like 89-92%...[/offtopic] |
Drummer imense! 23.03.2007 13:49 |
Atheist wrote: Human is 99% genetically like an ape, hard to get this into your head?But in your case we shall make an exception. Seeing as your sentence almost but didn't quite work, we will asume that it is wrong to test on apes. Oh yeah and atheists don't beleive in a higher power, so you're a little bit antidisestablishment in that sense. |
The Real Wizard 23.03.2007 15:44 |
rockyracoon wrote: It disgusts me that Queen fans can be so divided on this issue. Didn't Freddie sing "This Can Be Heaven for Everyone"? The crassness of many of the atheists on this forum has made me question whether I want to be associated with other Queen fans.Don't kid yourself... ignorance and bigotry have spread far beyond Queen fans. |
JoxerTheDeityPirate 23.03.2007 18:30 |
proof that god does not exist? oh god you are so unfair you took away Sonny and left us with Cher |
deleted user 25.03.2007 01:27 |
SomebodyWhoLoves wrote: Oh please! Freddie was a great singer, and musician, but he is not comparable to Jesus Christ! That's a gross blasphemy! Why don't you retards create your Freddie religion, and wear a T-Shirt with Freddie's face. And people will think you are crazy!Been there, done that. |
deleted user 25.03.2007 01:34 |
Atheist wrote:Atheist, you're funny. No, I'm not being sarcastic. You sound like me! haha. I'm not an actual atheist, nor am I a religious follower, but I do agree with a lot of the things you're saying. People are crazy on this site (not you...them) haha. Talk to you later, I guess :)ThomasQu?nn wrote: Freddie seems like a god to a lot of people - however anyone's life could be made really interesting and sad when they die - just add a bit of sad music to a video clip etc. Take your own life - i'm sure most people have fantastic memories of childhood and adulthood. Freddie had the same, only he's are captured on film. All perceptions. That's it. There's nothing godlike about him, or anyone. Take brian may - he's a fantastic guitarist, yet if you look back what he did it's nothing. He moves his hands on a piece of wood. Just mimic him playing the guitar - that's what he's done all his life - move his fingers around (just on a physical level here). See there's nothing amazing about anyone when you think like that. ALso take a funeral - people cry, yet why do they do this? Probably because there is an emotional piece of music being played. Imagine if there was an upbeat song being played - bet the reaction would be totally different - life is all about perceptions - we just create the rest. Now you know i'm correct - it sucks. But that's life.you are wrong, freddie wasnt like anybody else and there will never be anyone as good as him again |
deleted user 25.03.2007 01:43 |
I agree with Roger, I HATE religion. I'm fine with people believing in things, even I do (I'm agnostic...i think haha), but I hate when people try to convert you and they always think they're right, but we all know that only Brian is right. By the way, have you ever noticed that the name Jesus is really weird. Maybe it's just me. Whateves, bye! |
thomasquinn 32989 25.03.2007 10:03 |
Quick and easy: - The Bible is so full of contradictions that it is hard to find something in there that ISN'T contradicted, usually in the very same book. - John is a gnostic gospel, Luke and Mark are based on Matthew, and Matthew was not written down until AT LEAST 20 years of oral tradition had butchered it, not to mention the fact that it was based on the so-called Q-gospel (Streeter, Burnett H. The Four Gospels. A Study of Origins Treating the Manuscript Tradition, Sources, Authorship, & Dates Pierson Parker. The Gospel Before Mark.) - Genesis 6:2 "that the sons of the Gods saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose." is polytheïstic - Go to your nearest university, find a professor of ancient Hebrew and he will confirm this: there are more errors in translation than there are words in the Old Testament. Find a professor of Koine (Greek) and he will tell you the same about the New Testament. I could go on like this for hours, but I will refrain from delving any deeper than the top of my head here. |
The Real Wizard 25.03.2007 11:43 |
<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: - John is a gnostic gospelOooooooh, elaborate on this one! |
JoxerTheDeityPirate 25.03.2007 11:58 |
Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote:he plays bass like Aretha Franklin :-]<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: - John is a gnostic gospelOooooooh, elaborate on this one! |
thomasquinn 32989 25.03.2007 14:59 |
Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote:link<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: - John is a gnostic gospelOooooooh, elaborate on this one! link In addition, we know that John was one of the gospels used by most of the gnostic groups of the Early Christians, second only to the Gospel Of Thomas in frequency of use (interestingly, the latter is the only known gospel to possibly be the mysterious 'Q'-gospel). |
deleted user 25.03.2007 15:59 |
FriedChicken<br><font size=1>The Almighty</font> wrote: Freddie was a buttfuckerlmfao!!! |
thomasquinn 32989 25.03.2007 18:48 |
Gr8 King Rat wrote:You are one insanely disturbed figure. Your country is indeed going to hell: from an administration of religious fundamentalism, the crazed evangelists of the Deep South spreading their claws over the country and the hate of Islam being fed by Christian fundamentalists and Jewish fundamentalists who decide that the plutocratic government isn't so bad.Atheist wrote: sure i agree but you have to admit that religion is bad thing that destroys peoples lifesNo, its idiots like you that are fucking up this world. A world without faith is NOT a good thing. I'm seeing it right here in my own country. More and more people are turning away from God, and this country is going to hell in a handbasket. |
rockyracoon 25.03.2007 18:58 |
Beelzebub has a devil put aside for you. |
thomasquinn 32989 25.03.2007 19:07 |
redspecial85 wrote:Amen to that, but sadly, that is where it ends.Atheist wrote:Athiest, You should really do your homework a little better on the reasoning behind Christian faith, if you're such an expert on the subject of faith and religion, why don't you back all that trash talk up with some common sense and intelligence?SomebodyWhoLoves wrote: Oh please! Freddie was a great singer, and musician, but he is not comparable to Jesus Christ! That's a gross blasphemy! Why don't you retards create your Freddie religion, and wear a T-Shirt with Freddie's face. And people will think you are crazy!and you christians arent retarded and crazy believing in a story book of lies and wearing a cross around your neck? its like wearing some torture symbol. THAT is crazy True Christianity is about having a relationship w/ God...its not about persecuting people, its about setting people free, among other great things.Not true. Catholicism vehemently opposed notions of a personal bond with God, and burned people at the stake for it. Protestantism in its most common forms supported the personal bond (save for Church Of England and deriverates), but unorthodoxy was and still is violently beaten down. That is not setting people free, it is forcing dogma upon them. Maybe there is such a thing as 'true Christianity' which you mentioned, I think it was killed by the Inquisition, the Crusades (yes, they were against more than just the Muslims) and the enterprises of the Early Christian Church (the Orthodox part killed the Gnostic part) and the Protestants (mainly Puritans). Its the "religious fanatics" here in Western Society, who have gone around accusing and condemning people; those people have given Jesus a bad rap. It INFURIATES ME!!! Those people aren't TRUE CHRISTIANS!!!Amen again, you've scored another point! These fanatics and the damned media have painted a very bad picture of Christianity.The media are innocent for once. Like with the claim of a liberal bias: the statistics prove the opposite. And not just some statistics, nearly all of them. I simply don't see how one could create a religion around Freddie Mercury. As a writer, musician, and performer...he's had a tremendous influence on me. But Freddie Mercury wasn't Jesus Christ. I love Queen's music but I don't worship them...Me neither, but in an anthropological sense, it is exactly the same to worship Freddie Mercury as it is to worship Jesus Of Nazareth; both have left a (mostly folkloric) legacy from which a message can be constructed, and thus a religion created. Before WWII, any discussion among educated people reguarding Israel becoming a sovereign state again was quite a joke among people in positions of authority.And they were quite right; there were Jews living there for ages, and they had very few problems with the Palestines. Then the FUNDAMENTALIST Zionists were given control of the independent states, they oppressed the voice of the moderate Zionists, and thus gave all the Jews of the world a bad name with their very own Israeli brand of Apartheid. Biblical prophecy said it would happen. They were occupied and slapped around for almost 3000 years under the yoke of the Persians, the Romans, and the Byzantine Empire (among several others). And to the shock and suprise of the international community; in 1948, Israel became its own sovereign nation.That is one of the poorest examples of giving evidence and deducing from it that I have ever seen. The Bible makes an enormous amount of claims of stuff that 'will happen'. Just because ONE OF THE THOUSANDS came true, doesn't mean it all will. Besides, much of the Bible is filled with contradicting claims. I can find you a Biblical reference f |
Daniel Nester 25.03.2007 19:58 |
Looks like someone just read a book! Can we personally attack know-it-all idiots like ThomasQuinn? The self-satisfied, craptastic idiots like this. Did you catch the gem of a quote from TQ? "I could go on like this for hours, but I will refrain from delving any deeper than the top of my head here." Oooooh. He's so smart! Making fun of people and attacking them for their religious faith! And this from the country that assassinates filmmaker Theo Van Gogh for a movie! Get a life -- stay in school, TQ!!! |
redspecial85 25.03.2007 23:42 |
Thomas Quinn... Intereting points here. As far as your last point concerning pastoral authority. There are a lot of people that are abusive of their authority, that's clearly no secret. Look at the problems that the Catholic diocese has had on its hands for years. Its quite sad, yet revolting that such horrors could happen. All due respect, I don't quite see what Matthew 16:19 has to do with pastoral authority...the scripture says, "And I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven." That's a quote of Jesus speaking to Peter. Even if you expand a few verses it basically says in context that Peter will be the rock of the church. Any pastor that uses that as a defense for his authority is an idiot. I believe there is a level of "spiritual authority" that they have and should exercise over his/her congregation. But that verse isn't by any means a basis for their authority. They aren't the apostle Peter...period. Jesus came to fulfill the Mosaic Law and the Prophets and did so. And he stood against and out debated the Pharisees and Saducees. Whom were the "religious fanatics" of the day. They share a striking similarity to the religious fanatics we have in the 21st Century. I don't agree with Catholic doctrine, orthodox doctrine, or any denominational doctrine...Jesus' brought his message to draw his people together and save the lost...True Christianity and Jesus' Gospel is very unorthodox, and counter-cultural. After the 1st Century People really lost that purpose, and begin to add and pervert things. They became their worst enemy. The book of Acts is the example the church was given as to how to conduct themselves, and how to function. I think people like Paul had a good heart, and had the right intentions...I personally don't agree with 100% of what Paul says in his epistles. However, I do agree 100% what Jesus says. I won't bother arguing with you concerning the relevancy of the prophecys in Revelation. It'll be as pointless...because of our separate experiences and opinions. I believe in them...you don't...That's fine. As far as the translations are concerned...scholars have in recent memory (the past 50 years I think...) have done a reverse translation...and re-translated the scriptures in, what I believe to be a more full and accurate translation known as the Amplified Bible. Why don't you pick up a copy of it and read it with an open heart and mind, you won't see any contradictions in it. I don't know what would make you believe such things aside from the fact that there are so many ignorant people that label themselves "Christian." To me personally, Christianity is all about a Relationship with God. When I said I hope everyone comes to know Jesus...I meant it sincerely. I did not mean it in a haughty way. You made a lot of interesting points...take care...peace... |
Matias Merçeauroix 26.03.2007 00:07 |
God is one big vagina |
FREDDIE'S_DARLING_xxx 26.03.2007 08:14 |
i totally agree....jesus is crap compared to freddie mercury!!! all hail freddie!!! |
thomasquinn 32989 26.03.2007 12:38 |
I've read the old Testament in Hebrew (and the parts in Aramaïc in Aramaïc); as for the New Testament, I have contented myself with the Jehova's Witnesses translation, used in most theology faculties around the world: the original text, followed by a word-by-word literal translation below it, and a natural translation below that. Being the son of a theologist, I haven't much of a choice save knowing my religions. However, call it cynical if you wish, I cannot find comfort in the scriptures, only people trying too hard to force their views upon others in the form of 'divine sanction' (and if you are a scholar of Medieval History, you will find that this is less ascetic than it might sound). |
sparrow 21754 26.03.2007 15:36 |
ugh alright im back, and ive read further debates. TQ actually has some pretty good points in the last thread he posted. they are well said and have a proven point, that is not condescending for once :) now i do believe in a higher power, but i don't go to church, nor do i read the bible (i think one would call me agnostic). ive read parts of it before, and i cant necessarily say i can put stuff together easily. plus a healthy portion of it was deleted over the years, which means akot of history and truth was vanished, and manipulated by hundreds of translations and patriarchal societies. its really whatever you interpret as. some people (the fundamentalists) only see what is in front of them, and are only 'god fearing' because they are still unsure so they feel that forcing others to believe will give them strength somehow, which is what i can see that will give them an acknowledgment. theyre really just sick sad people who dont know what to believe and will do anything to convince themselves that they believe in a god, and that reading the bible is an 'easy ticket' to get to heaven. my dad used to be this way but luckily has changed over the years (to this day i cant stand it if he backs up his opinions because of religion, even if they seem to have a good point) the thing that just annoys me about all this is that people are insulting ones belief or insulting intelligence because some of us believe certain things. i dont condemn those who believe differently than i do. the only thing i feel is wrong is when there is in any form, some kind of harm done to attempt to get people to see it their way, which is stupid and a waste of breath and time. just leave it be if thats the case. there is no wrong or right opinion, which is why its called an opinion. |
sparrow 21754 26.03.2007 15:49 |
<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote:from what i understand the definition of a 'virgin' back in the day usually referred to someone who was 'not married yet' and not nessesarily saying that someone hasnt had sex yetjkdrummerboy wrote: hello again you fucking piece of SHIT.If you think you hurt my feelings you must be fucking reterted!!! You are nobody in my eyes and I wouldn't even waste my spit on you!!! Once again you are a fucking piece of SHIT who doesn't deserve to LIVE...Oh boy, how nice. A religious nut. Did you know that Jesus was either not immaculately conceived or female? aw yeah mary got it on with god ;-) :-p im going to hell...anyway... its interesting that you say that Jesus may have not been a male, i never thought of that. i stick with my claim of too many patriarchal societies in part of writing the bible. also i read somewhere the term 'prophet' is used loosely as well. a prophet was usually what was called a 'very wise and/or intelligent person, for example, like you said, Nostradamus. who knows? maybe Jesus was an excellent doctor and merely observed the world and people made different interpretations. |
redspecial85 27.03.2007 01:30 |
btw...love the quote you use from the lyric of "Shine on You Crazy Diamond" |
The Real Wizard 27.03.2007 01:42 |
Sparrow wrote: from what i understand the definition of a 'virgin' back in the day usually referred to someone who was 'not married yet' and not nessesarily saying that someone hasnt had sex yetActually, the focus on Mary's virginity came from a mistranslation. In the late first century, the gospel writers were using a Greek translation of the Old Testament called the Septuagint. At the time it was written, the Greek word "parthenos" meant "young woman", but over time, it evolved to mean "virgin". Anyone who has studied ancient Greek knows that... as long as they don't let their traditional beliefs hinder their work. And that's the problem... you'll have a tough time finding someone who can properly translate ancient Greek for this reason. Most books will report that "parthenos" means "virgin", but they will omit that it originally meant "young woman". Even most of the scholars are trying to protect what's left of Christianity. im going to hell...anyway...Only if you believe it exists... which it doesn't. Christianity invented the idea of hell. Read the history books... it didn't "exist" before. And Thomas... thanks for the links on "Gnostic John". Fascinating stuff. |
thomasquinn 32989 27.03.2007 08:09 |
The 'parthenos' bit is a bit of a source for many scholarly friendships to end prematurely, I'm afraid... We have sources of Athena Parthenos where it is clear that the word means 'virgin' (as well as "Artemis Parthenon" where the word is taken to mean 'virgin' as well), and these texts date back to the Archaic Period (ca. 800-490 BC). However, from the same period we also have text using the word in reference to girls / young women to mean precisely that: girl / young woman. Like the Latin 'virgo' really. There is no linguistic source to show us that there was any change to the usage of the word over time until the post-Roman era (>330 AD), which leads me to conclude that both translations are possible, and since no context is provided, are equally viable. Personally, I am inclined to believe that the term was meant as an unmarried woman, but I can of course not be sure. |
its_a_hard_life 26994 27.03.2007 10:23 |
:DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD |
7Innuendo7 27.03.2007 12:42 |
hmmm...would be nice to sing "Somebody to Love" at the top of your lungs during a church service...I bet Jesus & Freddie would share a laugh excellent posts TQ thanks! 168 BCE Seleucid king Antiochus Epihphanus places statue of zeus in Holy of Holies in Jerusalem 41 BCE Herod the Great, descended of Esau and builder of villas in south France, gains power 21 BCE Herod announces rebuilding of temple. Design offered by royal Jewish families rejected. 9 BCE John the Baptist conceived 7 BCE Jesus the Anointed born (his mother Mary, member of one of the royal families, held the title 'temple servant' thus the parthenos issue) 17 CE Jesus initiated into Zadokite priesthood 18 CE Caiaphas becomes high priest 29 CE Jesus rebaptised by John, along wth the 12 Apostles, opposes the priests, and disagree among themselves on political issues: Jesus wanted to spread peace with Rome, Judas & Simon Magus were zealots ('sicarii'...'Iscariot') 33 CE Crucifixion 40 CE Assignment of Saul to ministry as Paul 44 CE Agrippa I assasinated by snake poison. Communities established by Peter and Simon Magus went into exile in Antioch and Cyprus. Peter's group in Antioch declared independence and adopted the name 'Christian.' 54 CE Nero becomes emperor. 61 CE The Word of YHVH arrives in Rome with the ministry leadership, to begin planting the new seed. Paul was in custody of the Romans for hearings regarding Felix, a Roman governor suspected for murder. 64 CE Nero blames the Christians for the Great Fire of Rome. Peter and Paul are executed. 70 CE destruction of Jerusalem by the Romans in reprisal for the zealot uprisings 74 CE Masada The Q-document, "quelle" in German for 'source,' a catalog of sayings of Jesus and the general oral tradition surrounding His minstry, led to the the writing of gospel Mark by Eutychus, also called John Mark. Augustine started the erroneous view that Mark simply summarizes Matthew; indeed, Mark is the first gospel. Mark and 'Q' constitute the two sources which inform Matthew and Luke. John certainly contains gnostic elements, and the four gospels do match the lion (Matthew - Judah), ox (Luke - Samaria), eagle (Mark - gentile powers given domination over the Hebrews) and human (Jesus the Anointed) faces in the vision of Ezekiel. <Mark & Method: New Approches in Biblical Studies>, JC Anderson & SD Moore, Fortress Press Minneapolis 1992 ISBN 0-8006-2655-9 link |
sparrow 21754 28.03.2007 19:57 |
Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote:i was joking about the hell thing, since i made a joke about mary and god. i really dont believe that exists either. if anything, limbo would be hell IMO. i dont truly believe in living in some fiery inferno for eternity or any of that.Sparrow wrote: from what i understand the definition of a 'virgin' back in the day usually referred to someone who was 'not married yet' and not nessesarily saying that someone hasnt had sex yetActually, the focus on Mary's virginity came from a mistranslation. In the late first century, the gospel writers were using a Greek translation of the Old Testament called the Septuagint. At the time it was written, the Greek word "parthenos" meant "young woman", but over time, it evolved to mean "virgin". Anyone who has studied ancient Greek knows that... as long as they don't let their traditional beliefs hinder their work. And that's the problem... you'll have a tough time finding someone who can properly translate ancient Greek for this reason. Most books will report that "parthenos" means "virgin", but they will omit that it originally meant "young woman". Even most of the scholars are trying to protect what's left of Christianity.im going to hell...anyway...Only if you believe it exists... which it doesn't. Christianity invented the idea of hell. Read the history books... it didn't "exist" before. And Thomas... thanks for the links on "Gnostic John". Fascinating stuff. but thats interesting about the mistranslation, i never knew that. so i guess i was sorta close? :p |
The Real Wizard 29.03.2007 01:16 |
Sparrow wrote: but thats interesting about the mistranslation, i never knew that. so i guess i was sorta close? :pSure thing, boss... I'll give you two points. |
thomasquinn 32989 29.03.2007 09:26 |
Oh, Bob, Hell did exist before Christianity. In fact, it was named after a Norse goddess 'Hel' (who was a daughter of Loki, and therefore not really a god, as Loki himself was a descendant from the Giants, but was allowed to reside in Asgaard anyway, and for some reason equal in status to the Gods, a weird, long story). There is no doubt that she ruled something that was a true hell, as Nivlgard existed of cold, poisonous myst. There is, however, quite a lot of doubt as to who actually went there. Also, Judaïsm (though originally devoid of any sort of afterlife) mentions 'hades' several times in what we call the Old Testament. Then there were the ancient Greeks, who had three sections in the afterlife: Elysion, where the heroes resided (heaven), Tartaros, where the wicked were punished, and some weird meadow ruled by Hypnos and Thanatos where the rest of 'em flew around as some kind of bats for all of eternity. |
eenaweena 29.03.2007 10:02 |
bah. how come this thread won't die...? okay. wrong question to ask when this forum is filled with people against christianity so, nevermind. |
thomasquinn 32989 29.03.2007 10:34 |
<font color="indigo"><b>friedchicken \m/ wrote: bah. how come this thread won't die...? okay. wrong question to ask when this forum is filled with people against christianity so, nevermind.Are you really so damn stupid? A sensible debate is not anti-Christian. Anti-CLERICAL perhaps, yes, but then again, all sensible folks are anti-clerical. |
The Real Wizard 29.03.2007 12:35 |
<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: Oh, Bob, Hell did exist before Christianity. In fact, it was named after a Norse goddess 'Hel' (who was a daughter of Loki, and therefore not really a god, as Loki himself was a descendant from the Giants, but was allowed to reside in Asgaard anyway, and for some reason equal in status to the Gods, a weird, long story). There is no doubt that she ruled something that was a true hell, as Nivlgard existed of cold, poisonous myst. There is, however, quite a lot of doubt as to who actually went there. Also, Judaïsm (though originally devoid of any sort of afterlife) mentions 'hades' several times in what we call the Old Testament. Then there were the ancient Greeks, who had three sections in the afterlife: Elysion, where the heroes resided (heaven), Tartaros, where the wicked were punished, and some weird meadow ruled by Hypnos and Thanatos where the rest of 'em flew around as some kind of bats for all of eternity.Again, fascinating stuff. The bottom line is, there's almost always a way to explain how ancient theories and fables came to be. Wherever there's a student, there's a teacher. It still astonishes me how most people (even many very intelligent people) are so uncritical of their spiritual heritage and just believe what's conventionally told. Most people just don't know how to balance the weakness and crutch of their beliefs with new information. |
eenaweena 30.03.2007 10:29 |
<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote:i'm sorry. please don't be too hostile... sheesh.<font color="indigo"><b>friedchicken \m/ wrote: bah. how come this thread won't die...? okay. wrong question to ask when this forum is filled with people against christianity so, nevermind.Are you really so damn stupid? |
john bodega 31.03.2007 04:43 |
Take it from me, 'Hell' as an idea would've existed as long as we have. I'm not a parent, I'm just an uncle, but it's a lot easier to control people when you have something threatening like ghosts/hell/etcetera on your side. So I'm sure it would've been invented rather early on, to control primitive people who'd go for any old guff. |
thomasquinn 32989 31.03.2007 12:58 |
Zebonka12 wrote: Take it from me, 'Hell' as an idea would've existed as long as we have. I'm not a parent, I'm just an uncle, but it's a lot easier to control people when you have something threatening like ghosts/hell/etcetera on your side. So I'm sure it would've been invented rather early on, to control primitive people who'd go for any old guff.'Afterlife' as a human invention (since we don't *know* whether it actually is there, it is a human invention) is a very fine example of law-management. It has the added benefit that you do not need violence (or the threat of it) to maintain yourself, thus enabling a relatively low-cost way of keeping the order. |
AmeriQueen 01.04.2007 04:26 |
You are dissing Jesus and offending Christians, showing Christ zero respect... which makes you cool as hell in my book. Who knows what Jesus was or wasn't, but Freddie is at the very least a musical messiah. For me, belief in a higher power doesn't come from a fisherman turned prophet/messiahm an instrument of goodwill twisted and perverted into a multitude of religious factions who have killed through acts of war more numbers in Jesus's name than in any other being in history. However, Freddie and his band's music have caused no death, and in it's beauty I see a reason to believe in something grand beyond this world, or else how could such beauty just randomly exist? In short, I applaude anyone willing to bash religion, humanity's worst disease. |
The Real Wizard 01.04.2007 12:33 |
Zebonka12 wrote: Take it from me, 'Hell' as an idea would've existed as long as we have. I'm not a parent, I'm just an uncle, but it's a lot easier to control people when you have something threatening like ghosts/hell/etcetera on your side. So I'm sure it would've been invented rather early on, to control primitive people who'd go for any old guff.When you put it in that perspective, we haven't really advanced at all in 2000 years. Sure, we are more technologically able, but as long as we still think one invisible man in the sky is better than another, we are no better than our ancient ancestors. Very little around us is going to improve on a grand scale until this idea dies, because at the moment, very few people are willing to give up their traditions no matter what peace it would bring. |
magicalfreddiemercury 01.04.2007 13:46 |
Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote: Very little around us is going to improve on a grand scale until this idea dies, because at the moment, very few people are willing to give up their traditions no matter what peace it would bring.Too many people feel the only way peace can come about is if everyone else believes in their god. They will never see THEIR religion as being the cause of grief or anger. It's always the fault of other religions or of the non-believers. Someone right here in this thread said something to that very effect - that the problems with his country (the USA, I believe) are such because people have turned away from "god". As long as there are extreme and warped perceptions such as that, peace will forever be out of our reach. |
rockyracoon 01.04.2007 15:06 |
|
rockyracoon 01.04.2007 15:08 |
magicalfreddiemercury wrote:Ahhhh.......So what will it take to bring peace?Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote: Very little around us is going to improve on a grand scale until this idea dies, because at the moment, very few people are willing to give up their traditions no matter what peace it would bring.Too many people feel the only way peace can come about is if everyone else believes in their god. They will never see THEIR religion as being the cause of grief or anger. It's always the fault of other religions or of the non-believers. Someone right here in this thread said something to that very effect - that the problems with his country (the USA, I believe) are such because people have turned away from "god". As long as there are extreme and warped perceptions such as that, peace will forever be out of our reach. |
MamaQueen 01.04.2007 22:20 |
Religion don't kill man... Man with religion kill man. |
The Real Wizard 02.04.2007 02:55 |
magicalfreddiemercury wrote: Too many people feel the only way peace can come about is if everyone else believes in their god. They will never see THEIR religion as being the cause of grief or anger. It's always the fault of other religions or of the non-believers. Someone right here in this thread said something to that very effect - that the problems with his country (the USA, I believe) are such because people have turned away from "god". As long as there are extreme and warped perceptions such as that, peace will forever be out of our reach. MamaQueen wrote: Religion don't kill man... Man with religion kill man.Very wise words from you both. rockyracoon wrote: Ahhhh.......So what will it take to bring peace?Nobody has a solution that will work with the world as it is now. The majority of the world is far too religious, capitalistic, and generally absorbed in self-interest for any major social, economic, or human rights issues to be solved at the moment. But some of us are pretty good at determining what the problems are, so at least we've made a first step. Before we can even think of any practical solutions, there needs to be a worldwide consensus as to what the problems are, to which point we'll be able to work together towards a solution. There's no telling how long that will take. For now, I think the best the average person can do is simply talk to people, and encourage them to think. Lately (if given an opportune time, of course), I've started asking people this question, and it sometimes leads to interesting results: "Hypothetically, if it were possible for everyone in the world to be fed, watered, clothed, sheltered, and healthy - and all you had to do was let go of your religious faith and/or tradition - would you do it?" Of course it's not a practical question... but it's definitely a thinking question, for those who choose to think about these things rather than reject them out of self-interest. Try it out, and watch your belief in humanity plummet or flourish... depending on who you ask! |
john bodega 02.04.2007 05:40 |
"When you put it in that perspective, we haven't really advanced at all in 2000 years. Sure, we are more technologically able, but as long as we still think one invisible man in the sky is better than another, we are no better than our ancient ancestors. Very little around us is going to improve on a grand scale until this idea dies, because at the moment, very few people are willing to give up their traditions no matter what peace it would bring." It really does blow chunks that some people can't live and let live when it comes to religion. To me, it's not a concept that precludes getting along with one another and YET there continues to be bloodshed. In the name of God. Who, if there is one, is probably shaking his big white beardy head at it all... |
magicalfreddiemercury 02.04.2007 10:36 |
rockyracoon wrote: Ahhhh.......So what will it take to bring peace?Two very simple things you'd think humans - the advanced species - would be capable of. Acceptance and empathy. Acceptance of others whose beliefs (not only religious) may or may not be the same. Empathy for those in need - whether it be a neighbor feet away or around the globe. Though it's loaded with bumps and ruts, the road to peace is remarkably short. |
fightingdove 13.04.2007 21:50 |
Wow! I can't believe this thread is still going! Pretty soon you guys will prove or disprove the existence of God! Keep going, fucking fucktards! |
The Real Wizard 15.04.2007 23:22 |
fightingdove wrote: Wow! I can't believe this thread is still going! Pretty soon you guys will prove or disprove the existence of God! Keep going, fucking fucktards!It's still going only because you bumped it up, yet other people are the "fucktards"... whatever that means! |
The Real Wizard 15.04.2007 23:24 |
magicalfreddiemercury wrote: Two very simple things you'd think humans - the advanced species - would be capable of. Acceptance and empathy. Acceptance of others whose beliefs (not only religious) may or may not be the same. Empathy for those in need - whether it be a neighbor feet away or around the globe. Though it's loaded with bumps and ruts, the road to peace is remarkably short.Can't believe I missed this post! Very, very nice words. But until people are unable to distinguish *their* truths from *ultimate* truth (should such a thing exist), little difference will be made. But we're slowly getting there! George Carlin once did a bit on comparing people to chickens, and concluded that chickens were better people. "When's the last time you heard about a chicken who came home and beat up his hen? You haven't, because chickens are better people!" Uncritical thinkers will stop at the utter stupidity on the surface, but George has his own way of illustrating how we are far from being the superior species. |
john bodega 15.04.2007 23:42 |
If I could marry George Carlin, I probably would. |
you_rock_my_socks06 16.04.2007 06:59 |
Well whether religion is true or not I do believe that in some terms it is a very good thing to have. It prevents God-fearing people from committing crimes and murders. It creates kindness and relief from those who put others before themselves. Also the idea of Heaven as an afterlife is a nice thought to have as it creates hope for those people say who are terminally ill and its a nice feeling for them, to believe that death is not the end but merely the beginning. It will also keep people going, those who beleive that they will be reunited with a dead loved one. |
Treasure Moment 16.04.2007 08:52 |
you_rock_my_socks06 wrote: Well whether religion is true or not I do believe that in some terms it is a very good thing to have. It prevents God-fearing people from committing crimes and murders. It creates kindness and relief from those who put others before themselves. Also the idea of Heaven as an afterlife is a nice thought to have as it creates hope for those people say who are terminally ill and its a nice feeling for them, to believe that death is not the end but merely the beginning. It will also keep people going, those who beleive that they will be reunited with a dead loved one.yeah you are right, i guess if people is stupid enough to believe in it then it gives them hope and meaning which is a good thing. |
Mr.Jingles 16.04.2007 12:27 |
you_rock_my_socks06 wrote: Well whether religion is true or not I do believe that in some terms it is a very good thing to have. It prevents God-fearing people from committing crimes and murders. It creates kindness and relief from those who put others before themselves.Well, "religion" in a way also allows God-fearing people to commit crimes and murders. Through out the centuries people have used The Bible, The Qaran, The Torah, and other "holy" texts as an excuse to tell others that "God is on their side" and with the right to kill in order to follow "God's Will". People can interpret religious texts in so many ways. Sometimes good, and sometimes bad. |
Mr.Jingles 16.04.2007 12:31 |
AmeriQueen wrote: In short, I applaude anyone willing to bash religion, humanity's worst disease.I was going to applaude your high level of ignorance. I think it deserves an outstanding ovation. |
The Real Wizard 17.04.2007 01:30 |
Atheist wrote: yeah you are right, i guess if people is stupid enough to believe in it then it gives them hope and meaning which is a good thing.It has nothing to do with intelligence. I know a lot of intelligent religious people and a lot of ignorant atheists. |
Treasure Moment 18.04.2007 11:38 |
Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote:yeah but atheists are still smarter because they dont follow man made fairy tales of lies instead of facts that we are just animalsAtheist wrote: yeah you are right, i guess if people is stupid enough to believe in it then it gives them hope and meaning which is a good thing.It has nothing to do with intelligence. I know a lot of intelligent religious people and a lot of ignorant atheists. |
Mr.Jingles 18.04.2007 12:35 |
Atheist wrote:Looks like you're not part of the group of "smart atheists", aren't you?Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote:yeah but atheists are still smarter because they dont follow man made fairy tales of lies instead of facts that we are just animalsAtheist wrote: yeah you are right, i guess if people is stupid enough to believe in it then it gives them hope and meaning which is a good thing.It has nothing to do with intelligence. I know a lot of intelligent religious people and a lot of ignorant atheists. |
unknown 18.04.2007 14:57 |
I somehow feel a deep pain in my heart when reading this thread... ...but I still hope and wish humanity will 'improve'... All I'd like to say is that in the time of my Philosophy studies I heard a very intelligent phrase by Plotin, a Greek philosopher (translated from German, as I live in Austria): "To see the sun the eye has to be sun-like" or, more precisely, as interpreted by the community of philosophers: "To 'see' 'God' we should become 'godlike'" I too hope that everyone of us will strive towards being 'godlike' to realize the 'beauty' of this world - after all, it is in OUR hands... |
Treasure Moment 18.04.2007 15:53 |
Mr.Jingles wrote:smart enough to not believe in bullshit stories :)Atheist wrote:Looks like you're not part of the group of "smart atheists", aren't you?Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote:yeah but atheists are still smarter because they dont follow man made fairy tales of lies instead of facts that we are just animalsAtheist wrote: yeah you are right, i guess if people is stupid enough to believe in it then it gives them hope and meaning which is a good thing.It has nothing to do with intelligence. I know a lot of intelligent religious people and a lot of ignorant atheists. |
Mr.Jingles 19.04.2007 07:25 |
Atheist wrote:Smart enough to consider and tolerate the fact that every single human being thinks different?Mr.Jingles wrote:smart enough to not believe in bullshit stories :)Atheist wrote:Looks like you're not part of the group of "smart atheists", aren't you?Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote:yeah but atheists are still smarter because they dont follow man made fairy tales of lies instead of facts that we are just animalsAtheist wrote: yeah you are right, i guess if people is stupid enough to believe in it then it gives them hope and meaning which is a good thing.It has nothing to do with intelligence. I know a lot of intelligent religious people and a lot of ignorant atheists. |
inmydefence 11.05.2007 18:06 |
if there is ANYONE still interested in this post, here my contribution. a blog entry from a good friend of mine. hit the nail on the head really. and I, for the record, am an atheist. i added my opinion which is included. drawn out but nonetheless relevant! Religion Category: Religion and Philosophy Right, time for a bit of controversy, methinks. Religion: does it make the world go round? Is it just another way to pass the time till you die? I can't really answer either of these questions, but I can offer some thoughts from both sides of the fence, finally leading to my own beliefs. But first and foremost: DISCLAIMER Anything mentioned in this blog entry/profile, hell, anything I've written on MySpace, is not meant in any derogatory/offensive sense towards any belivers in any faith or any non-believers. This is simply my own take on the beliefs and faiths, and indeed the anti-faiths of this world, and shouldn't be taken as propaganda or a belief in its-self. I am simply expressing my views on other people's views (if that makes any sense), I am not selling a religion, or suggesting that I conform to one. All in all, it's a fucking online blog, and you'll probably have a more interesting time reading this than any of the other teenie bullshit you find. And remember: if you don't like it, don't read it! What sparked me off to write this, is hearing someone say "Religion is a piece of shit". Now, I'm no devout believer in any faith, although I can't help but think there is a higher power. Wether it's God, Allah or whoever, isn't for me to say, but anyway. This statement annoyed and hurt me to a certain degree, and here's why: What gives anyone the right to just write off, and indeed insult a religion in so light a way? If you say that, you are surely insulting and shitting upon millions of people, of which I'm willing to bet a good chunk are good, honest people. Take for instance, my Gran. My Gran rules, end of story. She's also a committed Catholic. I'm sure you'll all understand when I say that when I hear people say things like "Religion is a piece of shit" and "God doesn't exist" etc, it pisses me off. Why? Because in one way, shape or form you are in fact taking everything my Gran holds near and dear, what makes her get up every morning, and saying its fucking bollocks. Thats what pisses me off. Now for my next point. I'll be the first one to accept other people's ideas and beliefs, but what makes it so hard to swallow is when it's put in such a vulgar and, well, lets face it, downright pig-minded way. Is it so hard to just say "I don't believe in religion"? Why does it have to be "Religion is bollocks" etc? I can pretty much guarantee that a good slice of people who don't believe in anything are those who are against war. I'm not exactly hot on war myself, and I will agree that most wars are caused because of religion, and this ties in nicely with what I was just saying. If people weren't so downright narrow-minded and just accepted what other people believe in, the world would be a much better place. I mean, what is racism? Hatred of someone for the colour of their skin (amongst other things). What makes hatred of religion any different? For anyone who's still reading and hasn't crept off to write an anti-religion/Bidley blog, this is what I believe in. I've had no reason to doubt any religion. The fact that there are literally millions, maybe thousands of millions of people who have a faith. Surely thats got to count for something? Or should I just label the majority of the human population as deluded? I also believe in science, which cannot be denied. So, divided, neither (science or religion) have all the answers. Sorry people, but they don't. Together, however, you can have some idea of how things are and how they work. I guess what I'm getting at (anyone who has seen Dogma will rumble me about now), is that it's better to just hav |
The Real Wizard 12.05.2007 01:48 |
Great post overall. But I do have a few comments:
inmydefence wrote: I mean, what is racism? Hatred of someone for the colour of their skin (amongst other things). What makes hatred of religion any different?Because in most most parts of the world, what you believe is ultimately your choice, not something you're born into with no chance of escaping. The fact that there are literally millions, maybe thousands of millions of people who have a faith. Surely thats got to count for something? Or should I just label the majority of the human population as deluded?You're definitely on the right track. First, we should recognize that you're speaking in pretty general terms. There are varying degrees of how strongly people hold onto their beliefs. But when it comes down to it, Christians and Catholics (I'll focus on them, since they are the most populous people of faith worldwide) generally believe they are going to a better place when they die, because of some guy who died and supposedly came back to life about 2000 years ago. Some of these people also believe that everyone who disagrees with them will ultimately rot in a place called hell. Live and let live? Intolerance begins with people like these. Before we criticize staunch atheists for being critical of strongly religious people, perhaps we can recognize that they're simply being "intolerant" of the intolerance of people like this. Back to the old stories themselves. Most people of whatever degree of faith don't know when these stories were written, who wrote them, why they were written, and all the compilations of the translation process. That aside... they are just stories. Mere words. Words are just words until you believe them, and then they can have extraordinary power. Christianity and many other religions offer answers to the ultimate questions of life. I personally see people who cannot live without these concrete answers as being weak people in one way or another. If we raised our children without belief in the traditional parent-like God, then they would grow up to be more self-sufficient people, and have belief in themselves, rather than belief in an invisible man in the sky that they have been deluded to believe in. This brings me back to what you said. Delusion. You're absolutely right. I certainly believe there is a higher being or force of some kind, but not in the traditional sense. I see it as a force that we cannot tangibly understand. My denial of ancient fables is not a denial of the ultimate. I simply believe that no human-created religion or system of belief can fathom what the ultimate is. We are limited. The ultimate is not. You speak of the growing dialog between science and religion. It's a great thing that the two are trying to work together, but by no means are they on level ground. Science is the process by which we prove things to be true or untrue by testable measures, whereas philosophy (which encompasses religion) covers everything else, without requiring any kind of proof. Philosophy can be a beautiful and creative thing, but religion can become a problem when people turn it into a science, and insist that their convictions are undoubtedly true. They can force impressionable children to believe what they tell them to believe by threatening them with hell, and they can even go as far as killing someone who disagrees with them. Whoever said the world was progressing? Sure, we can build a good computer, but most of us don't know the difference between tangible and intangible things. If we did, we wouldn't have schools where "intelligent design" is taught as a science, and we wouldn't have several religious wars going on right now. More and more people in the western world are giving up on monotheistic religion, and moving towards non-organized spirituality or philosophy. People just aren't buying the old stories anymore. |
Sweetie 12.05.2007 03:28 |
what's the go with everyone writing so much? I mean sheesh, who reads it all? |
7Innuendo7 12.05.2007 07:39 |
Hear this: "...time, and times, and half a time..." the Essenes, just one of the proto-Christian groups, contributed the "time cubit" of 800 solar years, hence 800 ("time") plus 800 ("times" -- plural -- add just one) plus 400 ("half a time" ) = 2000 yrs A theist like me will tell you changing jesus to freddie in church means eventually some more people will hate Freddie! I don't ever want that! Even with the same passion that some people now deride Jesus, or Moses, Mohammed, etc. changing names doesn't change much. changing the times changes EVERYTHING |
magicalfreddiemercury 12.05.2007 10:37 |
Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote: I certainly believe there is a higher being or force of some kind, but not in the traditional sense. I see it as a force that we cannot tangibly understand. My denial of ancient fables is not a denial of the ultimate. I simply believe that no human-created religion or system of belief can fathom what the ultimate is. We are limited. The ultimate is not.Very well said, as usual. Might I add that, IMO, for humans to hold 'god' so dear and mighty, and then profess to understand god's grand meaning and desire within their own lives and minds is arrogant and close-minded. Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote: You speak of the growing dialog between science and religion. It's a great thing that the two are trying to work together, but by no means are they on level ground. Science is the process by which we prove things to be true or untrue by testable measures, whereas philosophy (which encompasses religion) covers everything else, without requiring any kind of proof. Philosophy can be a beautiful and creative thing, but religion can become a problem when people turn it into a science, and insist that their convictions are undoubtedly true. They can force impressionable children to believe what they tell them to believe by threatening them with hell, and they can even go as far as killing someone who disagrees with them. Whoever said the world was progressing? Sure, we can build a good computer, but most of us don't know the difference between tangible and intangible things. If we did, we wouldn't have schools where "intelligent design" is taught as a science, and we wouldn't have several religious wars going on right now.This is what hurts me, personally, the most about religion. The effect on children. It makes sense that the beliefs of the parents will be passed on with passion to children, but since religion is based on ideas not facts, children are brainwashed into believing rather than being encouraged to seek their own 'truth'. Hell becomes a very real thing that rules a child's life. It's unfair and manipulative to describe such horrors to an innocent child and have them live in constant fear that they or their precious family will suffer such a fate for all eternity. And for those who feel they are helping or 'saving' their children by teaching them this way, I say look at the young Palestinian children strapped with suicide belts. Their parents feel the same way. When will logic supersede idolatry? As for intelligent design - I find it amazing how passionately people can talk about faith as fact yet when it comes to the origin of man, they quite easily dismiss science as an easy answer. I've heard say how the Big Bang Theory is a poor excuse for an answer when it's 'clear' that only a higher power could have created such magnificence as the earth and stars. Facts be damned. It was all a well-thought out plan by an invisible superior being. Interestingly, the ancient Egyptians believed the sun rose and set at the whim of another invisible superior being. Though we've since learned the facts of that, many still hold onto an ancient, ignorant way of thinking and feel it is their duty to pass this ignorance on. Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote: |
Treasure Moment 12.05.2007 16:43 |
Sir GH you are a very smart individual! |
The Real Wizard 13.05.2007 00:03 |
<Font color=Puce>Deakys...<h6>Microwave? wrote: what's the go with everyone writing so much? I mean sheesh, who reads it all?Clearly, many of us do. If you don't want to participate in the discussion, that's up to you. Let's not forget that you're 13. |
deleted user 10.02.2013 21:06 |
Freddie was comparable to Jesus, but not Jesus Christ, a big difference for some of us who reject Christianity but love the character Jesus. |
*goodco* 11.02.2013 08:41 |
From 'Major League': Pedro Cerrano: Bats, they are sick. I cannot hit curveball. Straightball I hit it very much. Curveball, bats are afraid. I ask Jobu to come, take fear from bats. I offer him cigar, rum. He will come. Eddie Harris: You know you might think about taking Jesus Christ as your savior instead of fooling around with all this stuff. Roger Dorn: Shit, Harris. Pedro Cerrano: Jesus (pronounced 'hay-zeus'), I like him very much, but he no help with curveball. Eddie Harris: You trying to say Jesus Christ can't hit a curveball? |