mike hunt 23.09.2005 20:26 |
mike hunt wants to give queenzoners a brief history lesson. It seems some of you are confused, saying brian and roger created the band queen, exuse me, but brian and roger created a band called smile (not queen) then freddie joined forces with them and was freddie's idea to drop the smile in favor of queen. why am i bringing this up? simply because some on these bullshit forums keep saying brian and roger created queen, simply not true. roger wanted to call the band "rich kids" remember? also, remember who came up with the art work, all the early hits. What is mike hunt trying to say? One man created queen and that man was freddie mercury. followed only slightly by brian may. |
Sharron .G 23.09.2005 21:14 |
Who disagree's with this My Cunt?? Even Roger Taylor himself said this... You say Freddie = Early Hits?? Body Language, Under Pressure, Staying Power, It's a Hard Life, Man on the Prowl, The Miracle, (co-wrote) Breakthru, Innuendo, I'm going slightly mad, The Hitman, Don't try so hard, co-wrote The Show Must Go On (Brian has said the first verse of lyric's is mostly Fred's.... "I'll face it with a grin" line is Fred's)... So this means Freddie had most of the later hits as well....while dying from AIDS. I think John Deacon put it best in one of his last interview's on why he has retired "If Freddie is not there, then I am not working with Queen, it's me Brian & Roger....it's hard to be Queen, without...well...Queen." (JOHN REFERRING TO FREDDIE BEING QUEEN) I WILL FIND THE LINK TO THIS INTERVIEW....I JUST READ IT. |
mike hunt 23.09.2005 22:14 |
the reason i brought it up in the first place is there are people in queenzone without mentioning names who have said brian and roger created this band, so as a queen fan i must set them straight. A fan of all four members, it seems people don't know the history of queen, or else they wouldn't say such dumb ass things. Check the history section people. |
Sharron .G 23.09.2005 22:51 |
Mike, I agree with you... I would just suggest that if you felt strongly enough to create a topic on this, you should call out the people who have done the offending to your belief. Hopefully, if you do it politely, this can become a decent thread...with decent, civilized discussion. |
deleted user 24.09.2005 04:00 |
tell us when we should really care. ok? look most of already know this, but some of the new queen fans might not of and are presuming from the latest tour. now both of you shut the fuck up cos we dont fucking care! |
Ray D O'Gaga 24.09.2005 10:35 |
News flash - we already know this stuff. Why don't you regale us with tales of how Freddie wrote CLTCL while in the bathtub? Stunning! DId you know Brian's guitar is homemade??? Oh, did you know that Queen stole the show at Live Aid? It's true! WOW! |
Sharon G. 24.09.2005 10:41 |
Let's face the truth here- Freddie was Queen. Yes technically only 1/4 of Queen, but in reality he was much more than that! |
~Blue_Acid~ 24.09.2005 12:33 |
Freddie needed the band to get anywhere, without the connection with brian and roger and john, he wouldnt have made it and same is true for the rest of the band. Freddie joined smile, droped the name and wrote the early hits yes BUT, he only wrote the lyrics and chord proggresions and occasionly came up with riffs and to be honest, Freddie wasnt pleased with his vocals in the early days AND if the shear heart attack tour failed then they were gonna disband. A band is a band and thats how it is you fools, let it go. if your such a queen fan ten youd know how they would feel so pull the rods out of your ass's and get over it, you wanted them to go on tour, john wants to be retired and do you expect them to tour without a lead vocalist, its not queen, its Queen + Paul Rodgers, non of you complained when it came to the F.M. Tribute. Paul is not freddie, nor is brian and roger Queen but they are a strong part and if they wanna tour they should and if they wanna use the name they should. I dont feel like fred would comlain, REMEMBER HE LIKED PAUL RODGERS. |
All I Hear Is Radio Gaga 24.09.2005 13:02 |
<b><font color = "crimson">ThomasQuinn wrote: Four people created Queen. One of them is dead, one of them is retired, two of them are still playing. Those two are Queen now.Yes thankyou. Queen was four equal members. They are people behind their godly music talents, they can do whatever they want. It isn't your band, so why do you care? If you don't like it them don't listen to it and don't appreciate what they are doing if you have such a problem. As for me, I happen to be very supportive of what they are doing. |
deleted user 24.09.2005 13:06 |
and if Sharron G or Mike Hunt or BPP post anymore carp in this thread or any other thread about Queen RIP 1991 etc etc then they are daft twats who are better off dead! |
deleted user 24.09.2005 13:30 |
SMILE,QUEEN,RICH BOYS.... they could have gone with names like; My mother ass, or the cock or even piggy f*cker.... they are just names and it's not the name who important, the music they made were explosif.. and again, Freddie joint with Brian and Roger to make a team and this music is a teamwork....and Queen wouldn't be Queen if there were no Brian nor Roger... It is something magic that happened between the 3 of them an later of course joint by John (cause he had some contribution in Queen aswell)... This is going to take the road again of the never ending story alway arguing about weither who is the one who made Queen.... In my opinion they all did and there wouldn't be Queen if one of them were missing (it would be diffrent)... To talk about the Queen name... Freddie made part of Queen and maybe people believe this is bullshit, but even if you can't see it Freddie has still a life within the Queen songs and the majority of the song been performed are Queen songs... And I think if I were death, I would realy apreciate my songs and my work to be iternaty, remembered and ending up like legends....Roger & Brian cary on the candle and I believe freddie is with them in everything they do.... LIFE GOES ON |
Munchsack 24.09.2005 16:43 |
Brian wanted to call the band "Build Your Own Boat". Strange but true. |
Freddie's #1 Fan Forever 24.09.2005 17:27 |
Mike makes some really excellent points here. Because Freddie is not here, he can no longer remind us of the vastly important role he played in establishing the true essence of Queen. Brian and Roger should not be allowed to stretch the truth too far. However, it is easy for them to do this without Freddie being there. At the end of the day, Queen consists of: one genius, one really brilliant guy and 2 other guys who were pretty good assuming that they could get some significant writing help from Freddie. By no means are all four members of the band equal with regard to either talent or creative contributions. If Freddie implied this at any point, then this just illustrates how very humble he must have been. Tiffany |
Sharron .G 24.09.2005 19:16 |
3* taylorgaga (Begg) wrote: and if Sharron G or Mike Hunt or BPP post anymore carp in this thread or any other thread about Queen RIP 1991 etc etc then they are daft twats who are better off dead!Hey load that should have been swallowed... I know you aren't referring to me. |
Ray D O'Gaga 24.09.2005 19:33 |
Sharon G. wrote: Let's face the truth here- Freddie was Queen. Yes technically only 1/4 of Queen, but in reality he was much more than that!Wrong, dear - Freddie was *a* queen. Here's another news flash - Freddie, Brian, John and Roger *were* Queen. Freddie's dead. John retired. Brian, Roger, John when-he-feels-like-it and Freddie's memory are Queen *now*. |
its_a_hard_life 24.09.2005 19:46 |
I have loads of biography books about Queen or Freddie so dont go saying im one of those people because i already knew that Freddie gave the name "Queen" and all that! Yes he did make Queen ofcourse without Brian Roger and John he couldnt and most people dont even care what you are saying...whats the point we all no that Freddie made the name "Queen" whats your point? To the people that didnt no, well now you do. |
Boy Thomas Raker 24.09.2005 20:16 |
So, Ray, with all due respect as I think you're an A-1 guy who knows his stuff, if it's Frank Maudsley of Flock of Seagulls on bass, and Lemmy from Motorhead on vocals, is that still Queen because of Brian and Roger's involvement? If John goes on the road with the guys from Morris Minor and the Majors, is he going out as Queen? And if Roger and Brian have a falling out, and Brian goes on tour with Paul Rodgers singing, is that still Queen? |
kdj2hot 24.09.2005 23:18 |
Sharron .G wrote:Sharron, marry me please, because that was one of the most clever insults I've ever heard. "Load that should've been swallowwed" lol I love that one, you rock3* taylorgaga (Begg) wrote: and if Sharron G or Mike Hunt or BPP post anymore carp in this thread or any other thread about Queen RIP 1991 etc etc then they are daft twats who are better off dead!Hey load that should have been swallowed... I know you aren't referring to me. |
mike hunt 25.09.2005 02:29 |
trust me, i'm not putting any of the other three members down, i'm a huge brian may fan, i like roger and also think john contributed great things to queen. that's not my point, i'v read one to many times on this forum that brian and roger created this great band, we must educate these poor queenies. I read a line that said "why can't they go on as queen, they created the dam thing" refering to brian and roger. now let me remind people of a line in the song "only the good die young" where roger sings "you made a sensation, you found a way thru." who were brian and roger singing about? You wanna know why john would never play on this new tour? because he knows if it wasn't for freddie most of his songs wouldn't have been a reality, it's a fact freddie's had a great imput on john and roger's songwriting. it's a fact. while i enjoyed return of the champions for a few good listen's, i'm already finding myself goin back to the real thing. Live at the bowl anyone? |
deleted user 25.09.2005 05:56 |
freddie did not create queen neither, he just gave the name.... ---> they all did together |
mike hunt 25.09.2005 10:29 |
yea the name, the logo, the art work, their image, their first top 40 hits, their star power, all their great early songs (along with brian may). besides all those things they were equal, lets not be politically correct people, where aloud to speak the truth. If it wasn't for the mans songwriting ability and live performces they would have broke up after their 2nd or 3rd album. you could have had any joe to play bass. by the time "bites the dust" came out they were already superstars. John and even roger would laugh at you if you said they were equal to freddie, it's simply not true. |
deleted user 26.09.2005 04:18 |
mike hunt wrote: yea the name, the logo, the art work, their image, their first top 40 hits, their star power, all their great early songs (along with brian may). besides all those things they were equal, lets not be politically correct people, where aloud to speak the truth. If it wasn't for the mans songwriting ability and live performces they would have broke up after their 2nd or 3rd album. you could have had any joe to play bass. by the time "bites the dust" came out they were already superstars. John and even roger would laugh at you if you said they were equal to freddie, it's simply not true.....hey you said something yourself (along with brian), and I guess the voce in BoRhap doesn't count... (typic Roger voice) and to tell you if any of the those ppl weren't in the band they would have sound way diffrently... everybody had his say into it... Freddie actualy mentioned it himself on one of the documantaries back in time... saw about few weeks ago on German tele... The Brian Guitar sound is unique and the high backing vocals is typique roger... He did contribute a big part in Queen, but so did the others. in one of interviews Freddie said to a Brasilian interviewer, that he is not the leader, but the lead singer and tell some more about it group work... and I think we can go on arguing about that... But would Queen sound the same as if any of Brian, Roger or John wouldn't have been in the band.... This is a fact of life which the answer is NO... Because all ppl are diffrent and all ppl have diffrent way to give what they are... There are no to like Freddie, but neither the others... You could put somebody within them place, but none of the are replaceble, cause it wouldn't be the same. QUEEN ARE 4 MEMBERS NOT ONE.... BUT THERE ARE ONLY THE 2 OF THEM TO BE AMBASSADOR FOR THEM MUSIC... |
mike hunt 26.09.2005 09:19 |
i never said john and roger didn't contribute, i think both did greatly, but all four members were not equal. that's not even my original point, the point was brian and roger didn't create queen, freddie, brian and roger did. the obvious order is freddie and brian probably even (maybe fred slightly ahead for star power), roger and then john. remember my reason for bringing this up (besides to cause trouble) is reading things like brian and roger created the whole thing, well, my first thought was to let me give some of these young queen fans a history lesson. i can't argue freddie and brian needed each other, and to be sucessful for 20 years they needed all four members to contribute which they all did, but equal? no way. |
deleted user 26.09.2005 09:28 |
mike hunt wrote: . that's not even my original point, the point was brian and roger didn't create queen, freddie, brian and roger did. I can't argue freddie and brian needed each other, and to be sucessful for 20 years they needed all four members to contribute which they all did.I don't think I said they were equal either... I just said they all made QUEEN together... nomatter way or how they contributed.... so infact we are arguing for nothing caus I think we do have the same idea in the end. They did all 4... |
mike hunt 26.09.2005 12:21 |
i agree, arguing around in circles. I also always disagreed with people who say freddie was the whole band,(like sharon), but despite all the arguments, all us queenies must stick together, even the queenzone loser club, Lester, fenderick, sir, and alex. Despite mixed feelings, i like what brian and roger are doing, it's all about getting the queen name back out there, it's pretty dam cool hearing about queen in new york again. |
deleted user 26.09.2005 13:19 |
mike hunt wrote: i agree, arguing around in circles. I also always disagreed with people who say freddie was the whole band,(like sharon), but despite all the arguments, all us queenies must stick together, even the queenzone loser club, Lester, fenderick, sir, and alex. Despite mixed feelings, i like what brian and roger are doing, it's all about getting the queen name back out there, it's pretty dam cool hearing about queen in new york again.I see it as the ambassadors for the Queen music and aslong they are around, there still be a range of other good artists around like: stones, mccartney.... hope that some youngster will get to them sences and make some good music again. What has been said earlier on is that there is a lot of crap now.... and I feel a bit ashamed if that's what the future is bringing to my grandchildren (evendough I am only 27 today), hope there will be not much crazy frogs songs anymore...it's trash to me |
kagezan1313 26.09.2005 14:06 |
Flour + sugar + eggs + milk = dough eggs + milk = slop Nuff said |
ANAGRAMER 26.09.2005 14:51 |
mike hunt wrote: i agree, arguing around in circles. I also always disagreed with people who say freddie was the whole band,(like sharon), but despite all the arguments, all us queenies must stick together, even the queenzone loser club, Lester, fenderick, sir, and alex. Despite mixed feelings, i like what brian and roger are doing, it's all about getting the queen name back out there, it's pretty dam cool hearing about queen in new york again.I'm just back from USA (New York area), I was AMAZED to see so much Queen product in the stores |
deleted user 27.09.2005 06:08 |
kagezan1313 wrote: Flour + sugar + eggs + milk = dough eggs + milk = slop Nuff saidGOOD POINT BUT SAME GOES FOR WHAT CAN YOU DO WITH FLOUR ONLY.... NOT MUCH DON'T FORGET NEITHER THAT FREDDIES SOLO CARREER WASN'T THAT MUCH OF A SUCCES NEITHER!!!! |
mike hunt 27.09.2005 08:17 |
ok my little beeny you hit a nerve, another thing that kills me is when people mention freddie's solo work. yes i agree mr bad guy was a failure in every way, but barcelona is one of the most original albums i ever heard. simply one of my all time favorite albums in my collection and i have over 200 CDS. The Mercury and cabella story is almost as special to me as the queen story. I know some people don't get what fred was trying to do, but there's alot of us who rank barcelona close in excellence as vintage queen. Put that in your pipe and smoke it. by the way, the great pretender, living on my own, time, and in my defence are also great. |
great king rat 1138 27.09.2005 08:20 |
BHM 0271 wrote: If John goes on the road with the guys from Morris Minor and the Majors, is he going out as Queen?He would be just as entitled to as Brian and Roger are. (that would be sooooo cool by the way - Morris Minor kicked ass!) Just look at the beach boys - there are a bout 7 different bands who 'legitimately' use the name. |
mike hunt 27.09.2005 08:23 |
the new tours ok, not so bad. |
deleted user 27.09.2005 13:48 |
mike hunt wrote: ok my little beeny you hit a nerve, another thing that kills me is when people mention freddie's solo work. yes i agree mr bad guy was a failure in every way, but barcelona is one of the most original albums i ever heard. simply one of my all time favorite albums in my collection and i have over 200 CDS. The Mercury and cabella story is almost as special to me as the queen story. I know some people don't get what fred was trying to do, but there's alot of us who rank barcelona close in excellence as vintage queen. Put that in your pipe and smoke it. by the way, the great pretender, living on my own, time, and in my defence are also great.I did not say it wasn't good, I do like these song myself(in my opinion they where brilliant), but it is a fact (in sold nr) that it had not that much of succes with the public, than the Queen repertory... of course it might have been better if he would have stayed around... but we don't know that for sure.... I do like his work with Monserat Cabalé, I actualy like her work and have a big estimation for her. |
Madman007 27.09.2005 15:46 |
I think all 4 members contibuted a lot to the band. without Roger we wouldn't have "Funster" or "GAGA"... without John no "ABTD" or "IWTBF"... without Brian no "TYMD" or basically most of the hard songs... and without Freddie no "Bohemian Rhapsody" or most of the beautiful ballads. The fact is (and I think few people can argue with this) that each of them (Freddie, Roger, John, and Brian) palyed off of each other... in a way... they needed each other. We can see this "theory" of mine playing out on each of their solo careers. Yes, "Barcelona" was awesome (for me) but "Mr. Bad Guy" wasn't that great. Let's just say that Freddie wasn't AS succesful as when he got together with the group. Neither was Brian with his solo projects (even though I loved them) nor Roger with The Cross. I mean, if Freddie would've never egged on John to finish his western spoof song we would've never heard "...Bites The Dust" and without the rest of the band's support "BohRhap" would have never been finished and furthermore it wouldn't have lasted 5:55... hell! If it would've been left up to the label douche bags they would've cut the whole operatic bit... but it didn't... because the band stood together. And as far as Q+PR goes... I know I wrote some nasty stuff before... but they're not bad... they're not exactly my cup of tea... but they're not bad. Try and look at it this way... QUEEN MUSIC IS GOING OUT TO THE PUBLIC. Thanks to Q+PR there are new Queenies being created every day. And I like to think that thanks, in part, to this new tour and all this publicity being given to it Queen and their music are more popular than ever. So if Roger and Brian want to keep using the name WHO CARES! They're not doing wrong by it... they're spreading their most awesome music throughout a world in which present day music sucks donkey dong. And anyways... Freddie did create the name and the logo but after 20 something years of creating and putting in a little bit of their soul's to Queen it's not only Freddie's, but also John, Roger, and Brian's property and if ANY of the remaining band mates wish to use the name in any endevour they can... and we, as fans of their music and out of respect for all the things they've given to us, should back them up. P.S.- I know most of you know this, but for those who don't... Q+PR isn't even using the Queen crest. They're using a new logo. Granted it's some kind of Phoenix but it still isn't the same... and that says a lot about Brian, Roger, and Paul's respect for, not only Freddie, but us, the Queen fans, as well. |
mike hunt 27.09.2005 16:35 |
believe me when i say i know barcelona didn't sell all that great, in a way i don't understand because it's brilliant, but i also understand it's an album that's totally different and isn't going to be for everyone. I guess it will always be a hidden gem, think queen2, it's an album you don't hear about much besides a selected group who feel it's brilliant. Now, "madman" i agree with just about everything you said. even if these albums didn't sell well Barcelona= brilliance, brians solo stuff is also good. queen + paul is worth hearing. The biggest reason i'm happy their doing it is it's getting the queen name back out there, and paul is a good choice, he really is one of the all time great rock blues singers. yea, it doesn't get my blood going the way queen usually do, but it's still good music. |
Madman007 27.09.2005 18:20 |
Yeah, I agree with you but that's not what you were talking about. When you started this message board you wanted to say that Brian and Roger didn't create Queen. Well, that may have been the case... at first. But, as I said before, after 20 something years of pouring their hearts and souls into the band (I forgot to include John in there... but yeah... him too) it belongs to them too. So all I'm saying is that even though Queen may have been the brain child of Mr. Mercury, as it evolved it became everybody's baby. I know this is not what you meant... but you kinda make it sound like the band was Freddie's... which he said himself once it was not... to be more precise "I'm not the leader of the band, I'm the lead singer..." - Freddie Mercury. Imagine if the band "belonged" to Freddie... "Hot Space" would've been called "Mr. Bad Guy".............................................................. BA-ZING! Just kidding! ;) |
deleted user 27.09.2005 18:21 |
ACTUALY I WAS ONE OF THE POOR ONCE HERE IN BELGIUM (SOUTH) YOUNGSTER TRATENING I AM NOT COOL WARING QUEEN SHIRTS ... THEY TOLD ME IT'S OLD FASHION THAT I SHOULD GET OVER IT... BUT SINCE THE TOUR IS ON IT ALL CHANGED AND I AM SUDDENLY THE COOLEST AND THEY ARE ALL ASKING QUESTIONS ABOUT QUEEN HISTORY AND OTHER BAND OF THE TIME..... ANYWAY I WASN'T GOING TO CHANGE FOR NOTHING IN THE WORLD...I AM A QUEEN FAN SINCE THE AGE OF 2 AND MY MUM IS STILL LAUGHIN WITH SOME PICS OF ME BANGING MY HEAD ON QUEEN MUSIC AND JIGGLING WITH MY LEGS... SHE STILL TELS IT TO EVERYONE SHE MEETS... TOLD IT THE MOST OF MY FRIENDS WHEN THEY CAME AROUND AND STILL TODAY SHE IF SHE GET THE OCCASION SHE'D TELL YOU... I AM PROUD TO BE QUEEN FAN STIL NOW |
Boy Thomas Raker 27.09.2005 19:49 |
Madman007, why is it important at all that "QUEEN MUSIC IS GOING OUT TO THE PUBLIC"? With a gajillion albums sold, I don't think they need new fans. If anything, they're grotesquely overexposed in Britain and Europe. This tour doesn't validate them as an act, or their fans, can't understand that angle at all. As for the name thing, I don't care who uses the name Queen, as I know who Queen is, but a lot of people do care. However, the appeal of (early) Queen was the band doing something new and groundbreaking. Today, Queen & PR are simply a nostalgia act, albeit one with great music. So IMHO, this incarnation of Queen doesn't reflect favourably with my vision of what the band stood for, and that doesn't mean I'm anti-PR or Brian and Roger touring. Their standards have slipped, no shame in that after 35 years. |
Madman007 27.09.2005 22:29 |
BHM 0271 wrote: Madman007, why is it important at all that "QUEEN MUSIC IS GOING OUT TO THE PUBLIC"? With a gajillion albums sold, I don't think they need new fans. If anything, they're grotesquely overexposed in Britain and Europe. This tour doesn't validate them as an act, or their fans, can't understand that angle at all.You said it pal... "grotesquely overexposed in Britain and Europe." In Puerto Rico, very few people know about Queen. So for me it's kinda nice that more people get to hear about Queen down here. Even if if entices a little bit of curiosity and that helps create a new Queenie... hey! I'm happy. Here's an example: some friends of mine didn't know much about Queen... all they knew was "WATC" and "WWRY"... maybe "Under Pressure"... anywho... a tribute band from the States called Almost Queen came through the island and I made all my friends go... it was a GREAT show... they were awesome!!! By the end of the night they had all been transformed... we went in to the show 1 Queenie and 9 friends... we came out 10 Queenies. It made me so happy that I had turned people on to Queen... I don't know... in some wierd way I felt like I was giving them a gift... hasn't that happened to you? Well, I think... in some tiny way maybe... that all the publicity that's being given to the tour might turn some people over here in America. |
Grantcdn 28.09.2005 02:47 |
With all this Freddie this and Freddie that crap we should all realize something.....Queen would have been nothing without Brian....Brian and Roger were in a band Smile and then Freddie who was struggling in other bands because he couldn't be superstar with them and wouldn't have success with them...joined forces with them after Smile's singer left....they called the new band Queen....was the name Freddie's idea yes but it was a group decision to agree on it....so I'm sure if some bloke on the bus suggested it to them all the credit shouldn't go to that person either....Freddie needed to surround himself with talent to be successful and he was very talented too and with Queen showed why the sum of all parts was always greater than an individual's part...........Killer Queen was also big because of the great and innovative guitar sounds....Bohemian Rhapsody wouldn't have been nearly as good if it wasn't polished up nicely by Brian, Roger, and John and had the heavy blistering part (please note many cite this as their favourite part), Somebody to Love would have been nothing without the vocal harmonies (Much Credit needs to go to Roger and Brian there)and so on and so on and so on....Brian was/is a musical genius and really helped coach Freddie to get the most out of Freddie and his songs...........Look how lacking Freddie's solo projects were (for those who don't like rock and just like simple synth songs they may like Mr Bad Guy.......) It's not like Mr Bad Guy songs are playing all across radios everywhere....or Barcelona for that matter......let's face it - we never hear them......why because Brian and Roger and John aren't playing.........it's Queen songs that get played....songs played and written by Brian, Roger, Freddie and John.........Brian and Roger have every right to use the name - they were half the band (one is dead the other is retired) and they were there right from the start and agreed to the name way back then too (personally I still question why but people may question why the beatles called themselves the beatles.....after all it's only a name and the name became the band - I'm pleased that Brian and Roger are using the name of the band they started all those years ago with their music |
mike hunt 28.09.2005 08:43 |
i'm not disputing what your saying, but roger and john didn't become great songwriters until the fifth album, actually they were still growing. my point is if it wasn't for two men freddie and brian or brian and freddie the band would have broke up after the 3rd album, so all this freddie crap has some merit. |
mike hunt 28.09.2005 09:19 |
and don't forget, it's proven history. Just think, since freddie's death, what have the surviving members of queen done? pretty much nothing. I mean, it's not a couple of years here, it's 14 years. It's funny people rank on one solo album that was done in the middle of his queen carreer, his songs were already huge so he was able to experiment a bit with some good and bad results. I mean imagine if it was brian that died, and freddie released two forgettable solo albums with no success everyone would have ripped him, but brian gets a free pass. anyway, when thinking about what brian and roger + john have done since 1991 it actually makes you think (it's pretty pathetic), freddie truly was the genious of queen. the others were great, but fred was an icon. History has proven it. think pre 91 and post 91 the difference in creativity in brian and roger. case closed. |
Fenderek 28.09.2005 16:25 |
mike hunt wrote: and don't forget, it's proven history. Just think, since freddie's death, what have the surviving members of queen done? pretty much nothing.Ever heard about Made In Heaven album? |
mike hunt 28.09.2005 18:31 |
yea, with the help of freddie's songs, those are old songs genious, boy. I believe these songs were from innuendo sessions and a few older songs, unless freddie came from the dead in 1995 and recorded them. |
Fenderek 29.09.2005 04:39 |
mike hunt wrote: yea, with the help of freddie's songs, those are old songs genious, boy. I believe these songs were from innuendo sessions and a few older songs, unless freddie came from the dead in 1995 and recorded them.1. Just listen to I Was Born To Love You on Mr. Bad Guy and Mad In Heaven. Queen ones are faaar better and it's because of what? Arrangements, yes. Who did it? Brian, Roger and John... 2. Nothing was from Innuendo session (1990), they were from Montreaux session in 1991, when Innuendo was already released- 3 of them, one written together with Brian, one written by Roger, one written by Freddie. And the rest weren't like ready old songs just picked up for an album- in some cases (Let me Live) thay had apparently only about a minute of recorded improvised lyrics and melody line that was all around the place. Thy managed to create a song out of this which IMO is bloody unbelievable... 3. No, you're right, Freddie didn't come back from the dead, they were old songs written BACK THEN but done in 1995, arranged, produced (it was so technically difficult t took them 2 years!), shaped into an album. Saying that they didn't do anything since 1991 is just... ignorant... NOW- if you said since 1995- I could almost agree with you... 4. Anyway, don't forget solo albums- Queen wasn't a platform for Brian's or Roger's new albums, they recorded them (new songs that is) under their names and IMO "Back To The Light" for instance is bloody good record... Same goes for Roger's "Happiness?". And what about "No-One But You"? I know it's only one song but than- what point are you trying to make sayng that B. R. and J. didn't do anything since 1991? As Queen if they did it would have been slaughtered by almost everyone- it is going to be if they're gonna do it now, but imagine in 1992/3... |
deleted user 29.09.2005 05:14 |
I've seen to my suprise that brian, roger & JOhn have worked a lot back stage on product of other artists.... and evendough I am not a big musical fan what about WWRY.... according to some biog of ben elton he started writing this together with the Brian & Roger back in 1998... If we would be able to see a list of music that they have done without being the Key (person up front) I think we would be very suprised... also for john who's believed to be retired... |
Fenderek 29.09.2005 05:59 |
mike hunt wrote: History has proven it. think pre 91 and post 91 the difference in creativity in brian and roger. case closed.I recon if Queen existed in 1992 and 1994 WITH Freddie and he sang things like "Foreign Sand", "Driven By You" or "Business"- those would have been hits. I don't think it's about their creativity- they released those songs under their names so you have no idea what would have happened if those songs were sang by Freddie... So mayb ethe prblem is not in writing but in general audience perception? People see Queen as Freddie on vocals- they're not interested in Brian singing on his own solo album... Even if 1998 was the most creative era in Brian' life- those albums wouldn't have sold anyway- and I'm sure it would have been different with freddie on vocals... It's not usually about the music (apart from really CLASSIC stuff), it's about being recognised and familiarised with something... Many people didn't even check B. or R. albums out- because they didn't have QUEEN tag on it... For the evry same reason they decided to use the name on this tour- if they toured as May/Taylor/Rodgers- it'd have been smaller venues and on a smaller scale... |
mike hunt 29.09.2005 08:33 |
no one said they didn't do anything, and your correct they did do a great job with made in heaven, and no freddie wasn't the whole band. yes they all were fantastic muscians, i never said anything differently. The fact remains "innuendo" OR "made in heaven" is the last great work from the surviving members of queen, and yes i'm including their solo albums which were good but very forgettable, also the average (at best) no one but you. since 91, or 95 they act like washed up players who havn't done anything even close to relevant. Of course fans on this site are gonna dispute this and say how amazing "no one but you" is and how electric fire is brillant, but i disagree, their decent solo albums that after a few listens these albums are put on the shelf and collect dust. in turn, after all these years "barcelona" is so brilliant, that's why they have a whole segment on this album for the freddie box set. The bottom line is for the last 10 or so years these guys have looked finished as songwriters, even made in heaven the best songs are freddie's "winter's tale" and "mother love" until brian tried to ruin the end of the song. |
mike hunt 29.09.2005 09:30 |
the key word is "relevant" when i say they didn't do anything, i meant anything relevant to modern music. even what their doing now isn't relevant, their just playing old songs. actually very very old songs, is that new to you, the man who puts down "the works" and "a kind of magic" all a sudden is saying queen plus paul is new and exciting and "no one but you" is the next comming of "bo rap" or "innuendo" I know the truth hurts, but since freds death they been working with "pink" and robbie williams. Come on folks lets smell the coffee, lets be real. like i said brian and roger are legends but freddie was and always will be an icon, it's obvious their nothing without freddie, again this has been proven. Take off your rose colored glasses and face the truth. |
spymyshadow 29.09.2005 10:10 |
Munchsack wrote: Brian wanted to call the band "Build Your Own Boat". Strange but true.In an interview Freddie stated that the name quuen was in his mind even before the whole thing happened, that is, smile no longer there, getting cloer to rog and bri and so on... maybe he did not create queen alone, but most of the original idea was his. |
mike hunt 29.09.2005 11:17 |
boy, i'm not great with words, my man that was right on, just what i was trying to say. |
deleted user 29.09.2005 13:07 |
It's just a name... |
Boy Thomas Raker 29.09.2005 15:10 |
IT'S NOT JUST A NAME! |
mike hunt 29.09.2005 19:22 |
beeny, first of all the name is very important for any band. second of all the most important point is "most of the original idea's were freddie's" "not all" he didn't do it alone, but he brought stage presence, their image, the original logo. He knew excactly what he wanted queen to look and sound like. Obviously the other's had something to do with it, but remember the key words since freddie's death, did the surviving members of queen do anything "relevant" that's one key word. Another key word is "most" (not all) the original idea's came from freddie. |
kdj2hot 29.09.2005 19:34 |
Fenderek wrote:Brian has some great tracks, Roger has some great tracks. I don't know how successful their solo albums were, I assumed they sold decent overseas but you folks are saying they didn't but anyway there's a great post 1991 catalog from both of them. The tour is a nice taster but I want a new album from Queen because it's kinda hard to guage what they're going to bring creatively performing from the back catalog. Then you have to remember that most bands become great from playing live at the beginning. Very rarely would you get a band that gets together and instatntly goes in the studio. I forgot where I was going with this post lolmike hunt wrote: History has proven it. think pre 91 and post 91 the difference in creativity in brian and roger. case closed.I recon if Queen existed in 1992 and 1994 WITH Freddie and he sang things like "Foreign Sand", "Driven By You" or "Business"- those would have been hits. I don't think it's about their creativity- they released those songs under their names so you have no idea what would have happened if those songs were sang by Freddie... So mayb ethe prblem is not in writing but in general audience perception? People see Queen as Freddie on vocals- they're not interested in Brian singing on his own solo album... Even if 1998 was the most creative era in Brian' life- those albums wouldn't have sold anyway- and I'm sure it would have been different with freddie on vocals... It's not usually about the music (apart from really CLASSIC stuff), it's about being recognised and familiarised with something... Many people didn't even check B. or R. albums out- because they didn't have QUEEN tag on it... For the evry same reason they decided to use the name on this tour- if they toured as May/Taylor/Rodgers- it'd have been smaller venues and on a smaller scale... |
The Real Wizard 29.09.2005 21:54 |
mike hunt wrote: Take off your rose colored glasses and face the truth.This here is exactly why I and many other people will never take you seriously. You present your opinions as if they are the ultimate opinions over all others. That is conceited, ignorant, and unnecessary. You really need to learn a thing or two about tact and respect for the thoughts of others. |
Grantcdn 29.09.2005 22:37 |
If Brian and Roger worked together using the name Queen....their output would have been even better especially if they released material in the 90s but let's face it, they were grieving...guaranteed it would always be better with Freddie's voice on it - no disputing that....but really I wish they were recording together before now....you can never tell how well they would have done....and you have to admit....Brian and Roger solo is much better than Freddie solo so comparing the solo stuff of Brian and Roger to Queen with Freddie is completely not fair either.......Freddie had some great ideas but without Brian and to a lesser extent Roger and John they wouldn't have happened....just like Brian had some great ideas....Brian is truly a musical genius....just listen to the sounds he created especially on the early stuff.... |
quicksilver mercury 29.09.2005 23:11 |
Brian is a money grabbing looser. He hates the fans not like Freddie who addored the fans. Brian is stealing the Queen name for money cause he can't sell any CDs on his own. Paul is a disgrase for replacing Freddie. Freddie is Queen RIP 1991 |
Boy Thomas Raker 29.09.2005 23:39 |
Things I learned from scott_mercury: 1. The term 'money grabbing looser' has replaced the more common 'money grubbing loser.' 2. 'Adored' is now 'Addored' which I should feel 'disgrase' for not knowing. 3. 'Queen RIP 1991' was Freddie's nickname. Thanks Scott, good post! |
Freddie's #1 Fan Forever 30.09.2005 01:57 |
To Mike, Instead of simply calling you names and insulting you, I really wish that Sir GH and others would learn how to argue in a logical manner. Tiffany |
deleted user 30.09.2005 04:13 |
going for another round... well I don't feel like it... you know what my point is... of course it's not just a name and it important, but hey, what makes us listen to them is the good music in major parts.... AND I THINK THAT EVERYBODY IS AGREE WHEN I SAY THEY MADE THE BEST OF MUSIC... |
Fenderek 30.09.2005 04:25 |
tiffmoab wrote: To Mike, Instead of simply calling you names and insulting you, I really wish that Sir GH and others would learn how to argue in a logical manner. TiffanyCheck Mike's previous posts on this board- the only person who was calling names was actually usually Mike... Like here... link Somehow I still am talking (or trying to) with reasoning and... Oh, what's the point... |
mike hunt 30.09.2005 10:20 |
yea but i'm not the one now calling names, i'm simply having a friendly argument. I't seems peole can't counter my points. the only point i'm trying to make is "freddie came up with most of the original ideas" and the first four albums he wrote majority of the material. Am i losing some respect for brian? possibly, i'm now starting to realize this, simply some of the things he say's, since freds death has done nothing creative (including his solo albums) worked with "spears" teeny bopper's ruining the queen name. Putting out sensless albums like greatest hits 3 and queen rocks and not helping put out rarities and interesting albums. Bottom line, If freddie was here it would be alot different. he truly was the main man in queen. |
The Real Wizard 30.09.2005 11:22 |
tiffmoab wrote: Instead of simply calling you names and insulting you, I really wish that Sir GH and others would learn how to argue in a logical manner.You're kidding me, right? You think Mike Hunt has better tact and respect for opinions of others than myself and others do? Just look at his history of posting here. I may get into disagreements with people, but when it's opinion-based things, never will you catch me saying or implying that my opinion is above all others. That's just plain ignorant. Mike's last post was cool and calm, but when he gets really involved, be has that "bigger than thou" attitude and clearly becomes intolerant of others' opinions. I know you hate the '05 tour Tiffany, so don't confuse your "Queen beliefs" with your perceptions of other people. |
deleted user 30.09.2005 12:25 |
mike hunt wrote: yea but i'm not the one now calling names, i'm simply having a friendly argument. I't seems peole can't counter my points. the only point i'm trying to make is "freddie came up with most of the original ideas" and the first four albums he wrote majority of the material. Am i losing some respect for brian? possibly, i'm now starting to realize this, simply some of the things he say's, since freds death has done nothing creative (including his solo albums) worked with "spears" teeny bopper's ruining the queen name. Putting out sensless albums like greatest hits 3 and queen rocks and not helping put out rarities and interesting albums. Bottom line, If freddie was here it would be alot different. he truly was the main man in queen.well I have to agree with the spears thing.. I am quite not a fan of this lady.... which people would you like to see working with Queen???? |
mike hunt 30.09.2005 12:36 |
oh, i'll say up front to anyone who wants to hear it, that i'm not a saint on queenzone. I'm the one who created the queenzone loser club, lester, fenderick, sir and alex, i'm proud of that. "Tiffany" agree's with me, so get over it. Don't make me out to be a brian may hater or roger, but i admit i'm becoming sick of brian may's attitude and lackluster projects. I'm gonna end this by stating what is obvious, no one in queen since freddie's death has done anything "relevant" that's a fact. It's also funny people bring up freddie's solo album, that's one album, how about the brilliant "barcelona" brian or roger could never even dream of creating anything that original and creative. "back to the light" is not bad, but also is not anything new or original. Bottom line is their washed up has beens since freddie's passing. Why? because freddie was the brilliance in queen, an icon. the other's were great (especially brian) but freddie was and is an icon, ask anyone on the street who queen is, the first thing they say is, oh i love that freddie. no one seems to mention the other's much. this argument isn't going anywhere, no one could counter my points, so i'm ending it. by the way, if freddie's solo stuff was so bad why does he have a 10 CD box of it, DVD's and a great documentry. Lets see the other's get such treatment. |
smileexpert 30.09.2005 16:43 |
I really don't care about any arguments related to this thread...but here's my take on the 'origin'... Yes...Brian and Roger did initially get together to form the band Smile...(or more specifically...Brian and Tim Staffell advertised for a drummer, and Roger replied to the advert.) But in my view there are two distinct periods...and a distinct break between the END of Smile and the BEGINNING of Queen. Smile did not become Queen...nor did Queen grow from Smile. They are two seperate bands! It's a case of one band ending, and two of its members deciding to form another group with Freddie Bulsara and eventually teaming up with John Deacon. One band ENDED one band STARTED. I think it's important to recognize that Brian and Roger knew each other - from a musical-partnership standpoint the longest - but I don't think this necessarily means they formed Queen themselves and it was Brian and Roger's band, any more than it was Freddie's band. The decision to 'form this new group' was a decision that was done with Freddie...as kind of like a triple-threat decision. If this makes any sense at all. A. |
kdj2hot 30.09.2005 19:48 |
smileexpert wrote: I really don't care about any arguments related to this thread...but here's my take on the 'origin'... Yes...Brian and Roger did initially get together to form the band Smile...(or more specifically...Brian and Tim Staffell advertised for a drummer, and Roger replied to the advert.) But in my view there are two distinct periods...and a distinct break between the END of Smile and the BEGINNING of Queen. Smile did not become Queen...nor did Queen grow from Smile. They are two seperate bands! It's a case of one band ending, and two of its members deciding to form another group with Freddie Bulsara and eventually teaming up with John Deacon. One band ENDED one band STARTED. I think it's important to recognize that Brian and Roger knew each other - from a musical-partnership standpoint the longest - but I don't think this necessarily means they formed Queen themselves and it was Brian and Roger's band, any more than it was Freddie's band. The decision to 'form this new group' was a decision that was done with Freddie...as kind of like a triple-threat decision. If this makes any sense at all. A.You're wrong, not so much the Smile expert huh? lol, when Freddie first joined up, they were still going under the name Smile. It was made clear that Queen were formerly Smile even in adverts for their earliest gigs if you ever saw them. When I say joined up, I mean when Freddie first convinced them to stay together after Tim left. They weren't immediately looking for a new name, the first instinct were to continue as Smile, over time whether it was a few days, weeks I doubt months but I don't know, they thought it best to come up with a new name. Smile morphed in to Queem, it's not a stretch to se that. |
quicksilver mercury 01.10.2005 21:51 |
Freddie is Queen RIP 1991 |
mike hunt 02.10.2005 01:18 |
mike hunt and scott mercury are gonna create our own club, the winning club, while people like lester, sir, fenderick and alex will remain as the loser club. |
maxpower 02.10.2005 06:41 |
The point is this Brian & Roger worked together before meeting Freddie, so all these people whinging about getting together with Paul Rogers etc... its just another chapter in their lives. My opinion is Smile did lay the foundations, Doin' Alright already recorded by Smile etc. Anyone who has the Smile recordings can there is obvious connection. Its like saying The Quarymen had no connection with The Beatles because it was just John, everything is interlinked. |
maxpower 02.10.2005 06:54 |
Brian & Roger didnt start writing great songs till album 5? Roger was slower in starting off but at least wrote 1 song on every album upto ADATR, too say this about Brian is shit, him & Freddie had the monopoly in those early days Queen = Keep Yourself Alive (Queen's first if unsucessful single) Son & Daughter (B-side of said single) The Night Comes Down (The underated song the on album) Doin' Alright (part collaborater) Liar (Freddie actually nicked it cos he wrote the lyrics, Its Brian's riff so should a be a co-write its no fluke the riff spunds exactly Tear It Up) Queen II Procession Father To Son White Queen (arguably one of Queen's greatest early works.. as we know written before Queen) Someday One Day (not Bri's best I admit, but neither is Funny How Love Is or Jesus from Freddie) See What A Fool I've Been (B-side of Seven Seas of Rhye) Sheer Heart Attack Brighton Rock Now I'm Here (One of the greatest rock songs ever) Dear Friends Stone Cold Crazy (major influence) She Makes Me (underated for me) ANATO '39 Sweet Lady The Prophet Song Goog Company (quirky but original) Now put songs onto a CD & listen you muppet |
deleted user 02.10.2005 10:50 |
maxpower wrote: Brian & Roger didnt start writing great songs till album 5? Roger was slower in starting off but at least wrote 1 song on every album upto ADATR, too say this about Brian is shit, him & Freddie had the monopoly in those early days Queen = Keep Yourself Alive (Queen's first if unsucessful single) Son & Daughter (B-side of said single) The Night Comes Down (The underated song the on album) Doin' Alright (part collaborater) Liar (Freddie actually nicked it cos he wrote the lyrics, Its Brian's riff so should a be a co-write its no fluke the riff spunds exactly Tear It Up) Queen II Procession Father To Son White Queen (arguably one of Queen's greatest early works.. as we know written before Queen) Someday One Day (not Bri's best I admit, but neither is Funny How Love Is or Jesus from Freddie) See What A Fool I've Been (B-side of Seven Seas of Rhye) Sheer Heart Attack Brighton Rock Now I'm Here (One of the greatest rock songs ever) Dear Friends Stone Cold Crazy (major influence) She Makes Me (underated for me) ANATO '39 Sweet Lady The Prophet Song Goog Company (quirky but original) Now put songs onto a CD & listen you muppetthks maxwell power darling |
mike hunt 02.10.2005 11:02 |
side black queen2. case closed. |
The Real Wizard 02.10.2005 22:28 |
Case closed? Okay, yes Mike, you're right. Your opinion is better than everyone else's. Is that what you want to hear? |
mike hunt 02.10.2005 23:33 |
actually mr. sir as far as this topic goes i know i'm correct. you know how many times i'v talked to music fans about queen and most of their response was "freddie was queen" i'v personally never heard a casual fan say brian was queen. brians a legend, but freddie's an icon, you can't change history my friend. So i don't need to hear i'm right, i know i am. |
mike hunt 03.10.2005 01:42 |
to mr sir, i just wanted to add something, watch any documentry about queen and you'll see most of the comments and thoughts are about freddie. I don't wanna hear it's because freddie died, watch magic years (86) for proof my friend. VH1 documentry, anything about queen starts with freddie, that's why i am correct, it's not an opinion, it's a fact. I'm not right about alot of things, but this i'm 100% correct. freddie wasn't the whole band like "gwen stefani" is for her band, brian was brilliant, also roger was great, but freddie is the icon of this group. that's not an opinion it's a fact. |
Fenderek 03.10.2005 08:21 |
mike hunt wrote: mike hunt and scott mercury are gonna create our own club, the winning club, while people like lester, sir, fenderick and alex will remain as the loser club.And to think for a moment I thought taht maybe you can really seriously discuss with this guy... Sorry, my bad... Naive me... |
Fenderek 03.10.2005 08:24 |
mike hunt wrote: actually mr. sir as far as this topic goes i know i'm correct.Even if- by saying this you lose any credibility- it's a matter of opinion my frind. Just because the general auddience thinks Queen is Freddie means shit to me- the same general audience thinks that Robbie Williams can sing and Westlife are one of the best bands of all time. There's no such thing as being... Oh what's the point... |
john bodega 03.10.2005 08:40 |
YAWN, go and listen to a song called April Lady. |
teleman 03.10.2005 12:50 |
The inner workings of a band differs greatly from what the public sees. They perceive of the frontman/singer as being the band. How many people see Mick Jagger as being The Stones when in reality Keith Richards is the engine driving The Stones. Queen may be different but I'd say Queen was really a collaborative effort and Brian and Roger most certainly were co-creators of Queen along with Freddie. Unless you were actually a member of Queen you cannot say, with any certainty, otherwise. |
deleted user 03.10.2005 13:16 |
Zebonka12 wrote: YAWN, go and listen to a song called April Lady.I was about 1 hour ago... FENDEREK - about westlife! I am happy to see, I am not the only one not agree with best band.... |
deleted user 03.10.2005 13:18 |
teleman wrote: The inner workings of a band differs greatly from what the public sees. They perceive of the frontman/singer as being the band. How many people see Mick Jagger as being The Stones when in reality Keith Richards is the engine driving The Stones. Queen may be different but I'd say Queen was really a collaborative effort and Brian and Roger most certainly were co-creators of Queen along with Freddie. Unless you were actually a member of Queen you cannot say, with any certainty, otherwise.Talking about Keith Richards he's in my Guitar magazine... nice stuff about the way he plays and all that... |
The Real Wizard 03.10.2005 22:00 |
mike hunt wrote: watch any documentry about queen and you'll see most of the comments and thoughts are about freddie. I don't wanna hear it's because freddie died, watch magic years (86) for proof my friend. VH1 documentry, anything about queen starts with freddieThat's because Freddie was *commercially* the focal point of the group. That doesn't make him the most important member of the band throughout the music creation process, selecting songs for concerts, etc. Teleman made a great point above. Fenderek wrote:With guys like Lester, Fenderek, and Alex, I'm proud to be in such a group. Next group party is Saturday night. Brace yourselves!!mike hunt wrote: mike hunt and scott mercury are gonna create our own club, the winning club, while people like lester, sir, fenderick and alex will remain as the loser club. |
mike hunt 04.10.2005 04:03 |
actually going by john deacons words freddie was the main voice in queen, he said freddie decided on the game album to have freddie and brian write three apiece and john and roger write two songs. what does that tell you? remember? he said freddie's decision, but to be honest i mainly agree with teleman's comments for the most part. richard was the main force in the stones. |
spymyshadow 05.10.2005 09:14 |
The funny thing is that when rog and brian played as SMILE, mercury went regularly to see them live and to give them some advice. With the tragic end of SMILE Freddie told how it was clear in his mind what he wanted to do and how it wanted to do it with the two memebers left. Everything they have done since then has been under the influence of mercury. Apart from that mercury was the frontman, so, the first to be known, praised, and do not forget it, attacked, especially by the press, and whatever he was accused of, this would also fall on the rest of the band. No wonder that lukewarm queen admirers identify the band with mercury. When freddie died, most of the original alchemy expired, so that, and I think most people will hang me for this, the smile-atmosphere came back and melted with PR's tastes. It is the same song they sing, but the mood, the atmosphere is not quite the same. it lacks that something that would turn them into that alchemy they had before. that something was mercury. |
spymyshadow 05.10.2005 09:15 |
the other ingredient missing is john |
mike hunt 05.10.2005 09:54 |
thank you spy, i think people are jumping on me because i'v been too harsh on brian, but history has proven us right. I just don't know how anyone can dispute this, it's beyond words. Here i go again, you know what "spy" i'll leave it at that. Mercury was the one with all the brilliant ideas, oh i'm starting agian. you know what, i'll just say read a history book about queen. |
Freddie's #1 Fan Forever 05.10.2005 15:22 |
I thought that you guys might be interested in what Gary Langhan, a record producer who worked with Queen on "Sheer Heart Attack", "A Night At the Opera", "A Day At the Races" and "News of the World" had to say about the interactions that took place in the studio during the recording of various Queen albums. Keep in mind that this guy was an objective person who actually observed all four of them working together. "Freddie was always intensely supportive of other people's songwriting in the band and would give as much attention to one of the other's as he would to his own." "The only point when Freddie was not in control was when Brian was doing his guitar solos" "................ This sounds as though I'm being hard on the band but I'm sure that if you talked to them they would acknowledge that with Freddie at the helm, they trusted that nothing was going to slip." "Freddie just got the best out of the rest of the band, he was always pushing them, making them strive for something different." If you read his contribution to the book "The Real Life", Gary Langan is implying that Freddie was the real creative force behind the band. It is not really all that surprising that Brian and Roger have not done very original work much since 1991. I'm not saying that they are not really talented musicians, only that without Freddie, they are not Queen. |
mike hunt 05.10.2005 17:24 |
remember what "Mr. deacon" said for "the game" album. HE said it was freddie's idea to have himself and brian write three songs and roger and john write two. That tells me fred was truly in charge, it was his decision who wrote what and how many songs for a particualar album. |
Dickydally 08.10.2005 07:34 |
wow so much anger and hostilaty, i hope roger and brian if they check these sights choose not to beleive half of this stuff, yes freddie was the man who revolutionised music by taking a little band called smile and turnin them into the global superstars that they are, but he needed roger, brian and johns help. remeber freddie died in 1991 and theres alot of people that have got into queen since then and dont know the history, they just see since 1991 brain and roger and assume they created queen, as was pointed out earlier though with freddie unfortunatly no longer with us and john retired brian and roger ARE queen!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
john bodega 09.10.2005 12:28 |
I have to wonder sometimes. Look. Freddie's dead. Get over it - don't let that stop people from enjoying the music, Mike Hunt, BPP, whoever you are. It does not matter who made Queen, who thought of the name, whatever. The whole concept behind Queen was to merely entertain people for the sake of it. Just because one's dead and the other is retired doesn't mean that people still can't have a bit of fun. |
The Fairy King 09.10.2005 20:54 |
"It's only rock n roll, but i like it!" :P |
deleted user 14.10.2005 13:14 |
MIKE HUNT for President.....MIKE HUNT for President Freddie came and Queen was born (did Brian and Roger have any serious success with "Smile" before?) - Freddie died and Queen (plus the magic) was gone! The simple truth Brian, Roger and John ARE great musicians, but the tiny little essential that made Queen spark was Freddie. |
john bodega 15.10.2005 03:04 |
Yes, that is true. However, what you have now is a backlog of very good music that *must* be played live, whenever and wherever! To me it's small chips that it's not Freddie singing it anymore, the fact remains it's good music and it's got to keep on going! Plus, you've got two of the original members up there, still playing as well as they ever did. Who gives a rats about who created the band, yawn! Just go and see the show, that's what I say. |