Fenderek 22.04.2005 08:36 |
Paul Rodgers sucks! How could they! It's only for the money! Queen died in 1991 RIP. John is the only decent one I saw them live with this wannabe Rogers and it was crap. I mean- his teeth were straight! How disrespectful!!! And he was singing the songs differently- he sucked! They should have stay at home and do nothing. Nothing! Because that's what I want. Brian is so disrespectful. It's not his band- it was Freddie's. How can they now perform those songs! Those songs should never agin be performed- that would be tribut to Freddie. Thousands of ppl are having fun to some of the songs he and others wrote- is this suppose to be a way of showing him respect???! How wrong you are- you should be all ashamed of yourselves! All of you! Oh- and the tickets are too expensive. And 12 pounds for the program- give me a break. If Freddie was alive they would play and give the marchendise for free! He loved us, he was singing only for us- not like those bastards Roger and Brian. They do it for money... It's only about the money. Oh my God, how I miss Freddie- with him it was such a philanthropy... The whole tour sucks! Queen is dead! RIP Freddie Forever We love you There can be only one! He's turning in his grave. And all those morons who say they felt your presence at those shows! BLASPHEMY! Only we- true fans, the ones who sit at home and cry listening to SHOW MUST GO ON can feel your presence! Guys- please, please stop and show some respect to the greatest human being ever! |
Erin 22.04.2005 09:35 |
Yeah, man..Rodgers doesn't even have the balls to wear a LEOTARD!!! The NERVE!! |
Libor2 22.04.2005 09:42 |
Great, Fenderek. BPP will be in heaven after see this :-)))) |
deleted user 22.04.2005 09:45 |
For god sake, give it a rest. This and all the other "its not Queen" topics is getting f&cking boring now. |
YourValentine 22.04.2005 10:20 |
LOL @ Fenderek |
Fenderek 22.04.2005 10:52 |
What I find really funny is those who thought (or still will think) this is serious :) |
PieterMC 22.04.2005 11:31 |
I heard that he is also straight.... |
Fenderek 22.04.2005 11:37 |
PieterMC wrote: I heard that he is also straight....NO!!!! Bloody hell- it's even worse than I thought! :) |
Sharon G. 22.04.2005 11:48 |
I AGREE WTIH FENDEREK. FREDDIE 1991 RIP QUEEN 1991 RIP QUEEN + PR ARE TRYING TO RE CAPTURE SOMETHING THAT IS FOREVER GONE. |
Fenderek 22.04.2005 11:50 |
Sharon G. wrote: I AGREE WTIH FENDEREK.Good god- I knew it will turn this way. My dear- you actually completely DISAGREE with me... Oh that's gonna be so much fun ;) |
QueenNewcastle 22.04.2005 11:51 |
SixPence wrote: For god sake, give it a rest. This and all the other "its not Queen" topics is getting f&cking boring now.dam right it is. ppl who didnt have a chnce 2 c queen b4 (like me), now i hav a change 2 seem them live. ok freddie isnt here, but its still queen (kinda) |
Fenderek 22.04.2005 11:52 |
Buahaha- it's better than I thought! |
deleted user 22.04.2005 11:55 |
Fenderek wrote: Buahaha- it's better than I thought!You really are evil ;P |
bryans permed poodle 15069 22.04.2005 12:09 |
Fenderek wrote: Paul Rodgers sucks! How could they! It's only for the money! Queen died in 1991 RIP. John is the only decent one I saw them live with this wannabe Rogers and it was crap. I mean- his teeth were straight! How disrespectful!!! And he was singing the songs differently- he sucked! They should have stay at home and do nothing. Nothing! Because that's what I want. Brian is so disrespectful. It's not his band- it was Freddie's. How can they now perform those songs! Those songs should never agin be performed- that would be tribut to Freddie. Thousands of ppl are having fun to some of the songs he and others wrote- is this suppose to be a way of showing him respect???! How wrong you are- you should be all ashamed of yourselves! All of you! Oh- and the tickets are too expensive. And 12 pounds for the program- give me a break. If Freddie was alive they would play and give the marchendise for free! He loved us, he was singing only for us- not like those bastards Roger and Brian. They do it for money... It's only about the money. Oh my God, how I miss Freddie- with him it was such a philanthropy... The whole tour sucks! Queen is dead! RIP Freddie Forever We love you There can be only one! He's turning in his grave. And all those morons who say they felt your presence at those shows! BLASPHEMY! Only we- true fans, the ones who sit at home and cry listening to SHOW MUST GO ON can feel your presence! Guys- please, please stop and show some respect to the greatest human being ever!Best post on here for ages (apart from mine!) |
Fenderek 22.04.2005 12:11 |
BUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It's almost better than Monty Python!!!!! (and a bit scary as well...)
Libor2 wrote: Great, Fenderek. BPP will be in heaven after see this :-))))You were right! ;) |
The Real Wizard 22.04.2005 13:58 |
You're the man, Tom!! I started reading the post, I grumbled, and then I saw who was writing it..!! Ah, to be an old-timer here... |
MadeInMadhouse 22.04.2005 14:04 |
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!! Oh My God this make us laugh, Now the Queen is with a very Bad Company! well, publishing all the anger is good for health!! |
Ramffiss 22.04.2005 14:05 |
I understand ,and am with you Live Queen in my mind and heart |
Live Killer 22.04.2005 14:34 |
fenderek, I disagree!!! you are just pathetic... |
Live Killer 22.04.2005 14:36 |
your post is one of the SHITTIEST I´ve ever seen, expect for charlie gimbert of course... |
Paul Fisher 22.04.2005 16:39 |
For what it's worth - yes Queen as we knew them died in 1991. Did we all boycott the tribute concert? No - we wanted to hear the music again.Why else do tribute bands exist and sell so many tickets? Brian and Roger have every right to tour - just as John has every right to sit at home.We as fans have the right to object or to accept that we are never going to see Freddie again on this earth. As musicians it must have been so frustrating for both Brian and Roger to sit on their asses for so long and do sweet FA. I don't personally agree with them using the name Queen as only 50% of the band is on tour - but they have to use a name the fans and not so die hards will recognise. Perhaps if they had called the tour Taylor-May'd there would not have been so many objections!!! |
cintiamarcelad@hotmail.com 22.04.2005 23:32 |
Come on people!! Stop fucking around with this matter please!!!As you love Queen, you will make your children listen to it, and your children will do with their children too,etc. But they are going to listen to Queen with Frederic Bulsara ladies and gentlemen, yes with Freddie Mercury, the only one!!!. And don´t worry about what image is giving Queen these days,the person who had never listened to Queen before this tour came across with our lives, sucks!! So take it easy!! We know who they were and we are happy about that. |
Brianmay1975 23.04.2005 03:30 |
Interesting how all the people who disagree with the new tour had lost their sense of humour! They aren't even able to make the difference between a serious thread and a joke. I rolled on the floor laughing when Bryans Permed Poodle stated that this was the best topic he had read in years, except for his of course :)) Oh my, can't you even tell the difference between your crappy topics and this brilliant genial one? Lol Fenderek! You rock!! |
Libor2 23.04.2005 08:17 |
Exactly my meaning BM1975. Bravo Fenderek! |
We Are The Champions 23.04.2005 08:19 |
Like so many others...for f***** sake give this whole topic a long rest! I'll say just one more thing. Many other bands have changed their line up's.....so what's the big deal! Freddie may have been irreplaceable in most people's eyes but he's gone so f****** live with it and accept it! BTW, I hate people saying it was Freddie's band and his alone....complete bollocks!!! Brian & Roger were founder members with Smile. John was also a contributor with some of the most meaningful and memorable anthems. Most of my favourite songs are written by Roger & Brian e.g Show Must Go On & These Are The Days Of Our Lives from Innuendo so it's pure ignorance/small mindedness or media brainwashing to think that Freddie was Queen! Freddie said many times that he was never leader of the band so there you have it!! |
Libor2 23.04.2005 08:29 |
We-Are-The-Champions wrote: Like so many others...for f***** sake give this whole topic a long rest! I'll say just one more thing. Many other bands have changed their line up's.....so what's the big deal! Freddie may have been irreplaceable in most people's eyes but he's gone so f****** live with it and accept it! BTW, I hate people saying it was Freddie's band and his alone....complete bollocks!!! Brian & Roger were founder members with Smile. John was also a contributor with some of the most meaningful and memorable anthems. Most of my favourite songs are written by Roger & Brian e.g Show Must Go On & These Are The Days Of Our Lives from Innuendo so it's pure ignorance/small mindedness or media brainwashing to think that Freddie was Queen! Freddie said many times that he was never leader of the band so there you have it!!This is JOKE from Fenderek. Do you understand? Look in thread "This is not Queen" (or how's the name) and read Fenderek posts. |
Fenderek 23.04.2005 08:45 |
This is SOOOOO funny I'm one of the biggest supporters of this tour. I'm myself going to see 7 gigs. And I posted it sooooo many times... Seen one concert already (Brixton) and it was brilliant (even though A BIT sloppy at times). Now seriously- was it that difficult to see that it wasn't serious when I wrote about Rodgers' teeth being straight and how disrespectful this is...? Just shows what kind of crap had been posted already by all the nay-sayers if something like that wasn't taken as a joke. It shows one more thing- ppl don't read the whole thread- only the first post. Now I already said I'm one of the biggest supporters of this tour. But I'm sure there are going to be post underneath this one still saying- Fenderek, I agree with you, great post or "man, you are pathetic". What is scary is the fact that such a ridiculous and completely insane post, not making any sense whatsoever had anyone agreeing with it. As I said- funny and scarry. And I really was in stiches when BPP said that it was one of the best posts he had read. Babies- you've been had :))))))))))))))))))) |
Sonia Doris 23.04.2005 10:33 |
*hands a plate of cookies to fenderek* :D nice thingie! :D chin chin! |
Atomic Dog 23.04.2005 11:13 |
ROCKIN GOOD NEWS A cat fight. Freddie would have loved it! |
Gozadero Primero 23.04.2005 11:44 |
I agree 100% with Fenderek!!! I'm still a Queen fan, a real one and now aged 42 I still shake of emotion when I listen to You take my breath away But, it's not the same Band!!! Queen was the hottest ticket back in 1980's and where has the magic gone??? The actual musical performance is a disaster: long songs, poor voices, everything is made for Brian and Roger, I thought it was a band named Queen and not a 2-man group. Poor other musicians who hardly get some lightshow at the end... Oh dears, by the way I kust checked the setlist of the 47 Queen concerts I've seen in the past and there were at least 10 Freddie's songs every night... How many do we have under the new line-up? Apart from the celestial voice of our dear F.M., Queen was first and foremost Queen because of the superior songwriter talent of M. Bulsara not of BM or RT's. Enjoy it if you like, this is the free world... But the three concerts I've seen in 2005 (see that I wanted to give them a chance before criticizing) were disappointing; not a band but 2 guys trying to relive on our expenses days of a forever gone glory. Hypertrofied egoes, bombastic performance; definitely a band from the past. Fortunately, we still have the records and that's the most important thing. |
dixie 23.04.2005 12:50 |
hey it wasnt feddies band. it isnt rogers brians or johns either. freddie considered himself as 25% of queen okay queen will never be the same again but for gods sake im only 15 and i couldnt remember the great man himself. so this tour is the next best thing in my eyes. i will see them in may and if i dont like it then tough shit but i wont come on here talking shit saying queen died in 1991 and stuff |
~Blue_Acid~ 23.04.2005 15:15 |
Dont you know Freddie is pronbobly happy to see this. He would be upset to see them not do this. Freddie Mercury was the lead SINGER not lead BAND MEMBER. You guys make me sick. |
MercuryArts 23.04.2005 17:14 |
I don't what funnier, the ppl who didn't get that this is a joke. The ppl still ranting that this tour is a disrespect to Freddie & John's good name. Or the ppl who were so against this tour and damned it right from the word go but are now planning to attend the show should it arrive in their town. Kind of hypocritical don't cha think? |
daveboy 24.04.2005 04:57 |
Just watch a interview with freddie with a brazian repoter before rio he says himself he is not the leader of the band just the singer!!!!!!!! |
Nandeke 24.04.2005 07:51 |
Freddie ISN'T turning in his grave, because he ISN'T in a grave.He's only ashes. |
Fenderek 24.04.2005 09:16 |
Strange thing- most of the ppl that didn't get the joke.. I just simply don't know... I've been on this board for 2-2 and a half years and I don't know who they are and they probably don't know me. The ones who GOT it were mostly the ones I DO recognise or even know. Now Was the only clue a fact who wrote it, really? Was it THAT good impersonation...? ;) |
LiarLiar 24.04.2005 13:02 |
I agree. Brian, Roger and Rodgers together are NOT Queen even if they perform Queen music. It's all for the money. They sucks... |
puzzled86 24.04.2005 13:51 |
Erin wrote: Yeah, man..Rodgers doesn't even have the balls to wear a LEOTARD!!! The NERVE!!Freddie would be 60-something by now.... I don't think he would be wearing a leotard either! |
Novikova 24.04.2005 17:50 |
vivival wrote: But, however, maybe it was a good idea for Freddie Mercury, a gross, filthy, discusting sodomite, to be replaced by someone else.I HOPE you're kidding. |
Oberon62AU 25.04.2005 03:21 |
Fenderek wrote: Buahaha- it's better than I thought!<LOL> youre right Fenderek it IS gonna be better than you thought. I read your original post through once and thought... hang on, that cant be right. Fenderek is normally pretty reasonable. So I re-read it and just laughed out loud cos I knew you were doing such a big piss-take on all the QUEEN 1991 RIP'ers like that mangy Poodle that hangs around here yapping like its got a vital part of its anatomy caught in a trap <grin> Very funny stuff! Even funnier is how many people didnt read it through and thought you were serious! <grin> Steve |
RohemianBapsody 25.04.2005 08:27 |
But Fenderick was being serious ......... wasn't he ;) |
Fenderek 25.04.2005 08:37 |
RohemianBapsody wrote: But Fenderick was being serious ......... wasn't he ;)Yeah, sure I was ;) (this is a wink, right!? some still will miss it...) |
Judy Cain 25.04.2005 19:50 |
ROFLMAO very good job glad to see someone have a nice chuckle. Classic Rock Forum & Chat link |
RohemianBapsody 26.04.2005 03:17 |
Fenderek wrote:Best reply was BPP ..... ha ha what a jerk.RohemianBapsody wrote: But Fenderick was being serious ......... wasn't he ;)Yeah, sure I was ;) (this is a wink, right!? some still will miss it...) |
alibat 26.04.2005 05:31 |
All these people slagging each other off for daring to criticise anything about the tour etc is getting boring. Everyone is entitiled to their opinion. Those people who say that you have to agree with everything Brian and Roger do or you're not a true Queen fan are also talking rubbish. As a Queen fan of nearly 30 years I do class myself as a true fan (one who skivved off school to secure concert tickets, and I'm a teacher now). Hovever I'm long past the stage of uncritical adoration of everything they do. It doesn't mean I love their music any less. As for the tour, I and those I know personally have the same view. We are not happy about the use of the Queen name deep down. It won't stop us going to the concerts though because we are still pleased as punch that Brian and Roger are performing together again (just like we didn't hesitate to go to their solo shows, but this is better). As for Paul Rodgers, having seen him with Bad Co I can vouch for him being very, very, good. No, he isn't Freddie but then we all know that there will never be anyone like him again. I do think that Brian and Roger have done, and worked with some very dubious stuff post Freddie using the Queen name which bothers me far more than using the name for this tour, despite not being really keen on the idea. Hooking up with Paul Rogers however I have no problem with. John will be sorely missed. |
RohemianBapsody 27.04.2005 03:30 |
Totally agree alibat. Everybody is entitled to their opinion and I respect some comments, but to drone on like a broken record (Queen RIP 1991) becomes monotenous and adds nothing to the post. I was unsure of Paul Rodgers as lead, but the wierdest feeling was the Freddie Tribute concert as it was the first time I saw Queen without Freddie. |
frank39 27.04.2005 08:17 |
We were in Dortmund yesterday, it was horrible. Brian and Roger are destroying their names and the whole Queen story. Who the fuck is Paul Rodgers? Free (except the first Tons of Sobs Album) all crap, Bad Company... the name speaks for itsself. The only community between Free and Queen is the death of Paul Kossoff here and Freddie there. Thats it. Did Brian and Roger ever see a Bowie concert lately? Thats the way, how to make a brilliant show in 2005. Not with poor Paul Rodgers, swinging his Mikro, this was even better performed by Robert Plant and Roger Daltrey.( And I hate it anyway) The light Show, if can call it so, was poor, a few back videos, thats it???? From QUEEN??? From the Band who claimed to be the Champions of the world? Please Brian, don´t do that again. The Musical keeps the Queen legacy alive, this tour is about to kill it. |
Fenderek 30.05.2005 16:23 |
Anyone? :P |
AC 30.05.2005 18:06 |
Fenderek wrote: Anyone? :PFENDEREK YOU'RE AN IDIOT A BASTARD A TWAT AND YOU DESERVE TO DIE FOR WHAT YOU SAID! FREDDIE HATES YOU! |
deleted user 31.05.2005 05:03 |
I am laughting my asse off.... ppl pro and ppl contra and at the end of the day ppl that enjoy the joke of Fendered (that would include me)... And even dough he said a few time that it only was a joke ppl still getting angry and replying the most hidious reply.... I can tell (I probably am a lil sadic)I am having fun reading all this HAISA FENDERED, Tx guy it is even better than any comic show... U should do one some time....whhhhhhhhhhhhha'za Lil'Bee |
proton 01.06.2005 03:24 |
it's just a f*cking name for christ sake... people just get too exited about these things... :-) The band rocked. That's a fact. We all had a bloody good time during this tour. Anyone saying otherwise should see a shrink :-) |
Beobrand 01.06.2005 04:20 |
LOL @ this thread! |
Scott_Mercury 01.06.2005 09:09 |
1) Freddie would be 58 right now, 59 on Sept. 5th of 2005. 2) Freddie wrote over 70% of the Queen songs that cracked the top 20 in the USA & UK. Freddie wrote approx. 47% of the groups overall output... plus he is the image most all public links with the band. Like I've said before, in the United States... everyone knows Freddie Mercury... one in 500 people walking down the street could not tell you the name of another band member. If it wasn't for Freddie...where would "Smile" have gone??? They would have been some long forgotten about English band that played a few gigs in the late 1960's..... Bottom line: Its doubtful that we would all have twelve or thirteen "Smile" cds that we charish.... while telling everyone that Tim Staffel is the greatest frontman ever. What turned Smile (unheard of nobody's) in Queen was Freddie Mercury. You think its by chance that Queen started getting their sound down, and becoming what would be "Queen" as we know it when Freddie arrived?? The very modest Freddie would never say "Not only I'm I the lead singer, but I made this band what it is...thats right...I'm in charge". C'mon.... he knew that would just piss the others off. Brian, Roger + John were all important contributors to Queen... both in sound, and with some hit songs. But I still feel that songs such as "Tie Your Mother Down" (Brians) Another one bites the dust (John's) and Radio Ga Ga (Roger) .... would never have gotten off the ground had it not been for Freddie. ,,, and as for his own songs... it was the campy broadway, meets opera, meets vaudville, meets rock songs of Bo Rhap, Killer Queen, Good Old Fashion Lover Boy, Somebody to Love, Don't stop me now, Jealousy, ..etc..etc... that for me, REALLY DEFINE QUEEN'S UNIQUE SOUND. From the name, to the look, to the sound.... Freddie is at least, singlehandedly, 50 to 60% responsible for taking the group in the direction it went. That kind of means he was the groups leader in a way. Meanwhile, the new tour... yeah, I'll go see them... its my only chance. I like PR. and Bri and Rog still sound great. Is it Queen?? somewhat... Just not the real thing. But it beats nothing. |
willem-jan 8923 01.06.2005 09:41 |
So, whithout Brian, Roger and John, Wreckage or Ibex would have been a very big name nowadays? I think not. I prefer the Smile stuff over the Freddie bands. |
bryans permed poodle 15069 01.06.2005 13:50 |
Scott_Mercury wrote: 1) Freddie would be 58 right now, 59 on Sept. 5th of 2005. 2) Freddie wrote over 70% of the Queen songs that cracked the top 20 in the USA & UK. Freddie wrote approx. 47% of the groups overall output... plus he is the image most all public links with the band. Like I've said before, in the United States... everyone knows Freddie Mercury... one in 500 people walking down the street could not tell you the name of another band member. If it wasn't for Freddie...where would "Smile" have gone??? They would have been some long forgotten about English band that played a few gigs in the late 1960's..... Bottom line: Its doubtful that we would all have twelve or thirteen "Smile" cds that we charish.... while telling everyone that Tim Staffel is the greatest frontman ever. What turned Smile (unheard of nobody's) in Queen was Freddie Mercury. You think its by chance that Queen started getting their sound down, and becoming what would be "Queen" as we know it when Freddie arrived?? The very modest Freddie would never say "Not only I'm I the lead singer, but I made this band what it is...thats right...I'm in charge". C'mon.... he knew that would just piss the others off. Brian, Roger + John were all important contributors to Queen... both in sound, and with some hit songs. But I still feel that songs such as "Tie Your Mother Down" (Brians) Another one bites the dust (John's) and Radio Ga Ga (Roger) .... would never have gotten off the ground had it not been for Freddie. ,,, and as for his own songs... it was the campy broadway, meets opera, meets vaudville, meets rock songs of Bo Rhap, Killer Queen, Good Old Fashion Lover Boy, Somebody to Love, Don't stop me now, Jealousy, ..etc..etc... that for me, REALLY DEFINE QUEEN'S UNIQUE SOUND. From the name, to the look, to the sound.... Freddie is at least, singlehandedly, 50 to 60% responsible for taking the group in the direction it went. That kind of means he was the groups leader in a way. Meanwhile, the new tour... yeah, I'll go see them... its my only chance. I like PR. and Bri and Rog still sound great. Is it Queen?? somewhat... Just not the real thing. But it beats nothing.Agree at the end of the day Freddie WAS Queen. |
kingogre 01.06.2005 14:26 |
Brian Mays importance for queen is not to be overlooked though. Just listen to Sheer heart attack or any of the 70's albums, his guitarwork is fundamental on those records. Or listen to his solo albums to hear how much they sound like queen albums. Also remember that in 70's he was one of the worlds absolutely best guitarists and that he even today is mentioned among them. Did he become such a good guitarist because of Freddie or because of him being talented? |
Boy Thomas Raker 01.06.2005 14:59 |
Good question KingOgre. I think it's a case of musical soulmates. Freddie and Brian's solo stuff pales in comparison to their Queen work, because neither is close to as good without the other. Listen how Brian's playing changes from the debut to Queen II. I love the White side, but I think Brian's real Queen sound took shape on the black side, which was Freddie's stuff. Freddie also composed in unusual for rock keys which made Brian's playing sound ever more unique. So did Freddie make Brian better? Absolutely. But Brian's writing in the 70s was second to none, and he probably made Freddie a better writer and singer. I heard that Freddie hated singing It's Late because Brian pushed him so hard on the high notes. Maybe if Freddie didn't have Brian pushing him he wouldn't have been the icon he is. For instance, Eric Clapton is a great guitarist, but try and imagine him playing his bluesy rock stuff in Bohemian Rhapsody or the end of Lily of the Valley. Wouldn't work. The two of them are like Page/Plant, John/Taupin, Jagger/Richards and Townshend/Daltrey. Inseperable, and better together than apart. |
kingogre 01.06.2005 15:30 |
In many ways I think that Brian is an icon too, his hairdo and his guitarplaying are both instantly recognisable. I completely agree with you BHM, Freddie and Brian were both virtouso musicians I dare say, but together they also became virtouso music-creators. This is, I think, in the end what made Queen so great. |
Scott_Mercury 01.06.2005 21:04 |
Oh no... I am not saying "Freddie taught Brian how to play guitar"... Conversely though, Freddie is every bit the paino player that Brian is guitarist... and I highly doubt that Brian "showed Freddie anything on piano"... as Freddie is 10 times the pianist Brian is/was. Freddie (per the words of Roger Taylor) made the rest of Queen step their game up.... Brian and Roger already had SOME of the Queen sound down.... but it was Freddie who defined it, and pulled it all together... and was 100% responsible for the piano/camp/broadway/opera/choir.... Smile was a decent prog rock band... decent at best.... and obviously the rest of the world agreed with this, as they were a "went nowhere band". Freddie also needed some quality musicians to help him get out there...so Freddie needed Brian & Roger too. I feel one would argue though that Freddie (could write, could sing, could amaze a crowd)... with much more force than Brian or Roger.... if this is true (it is) ... then Brian & Rog needed Freddie worse than he needed them. PLUS... Freddie alone is 100 times the performer that Brian, Roger, John, Paul Rodgers, Bruce Springsteen (insert whoever) is..... I mean, in 1982... if you went to a Queen concert... you knew you were going to see John Deacon.... but 99.8% of the crowd were there to SEE Freddie Mercury's performance, energy, flameboyance..etc. Don't kid yourself folks... on a fanatic website (such as Queenzone) ... you may find some people who for whatever reason like Rog, John, or Brian better than Freddie. But don't dulute yourself into thinking even 1% of the rest of the general audience feels this way... I love all of Queen...but if for nothing else besides the hit songs, and the over the top live performance... I would call Freddie the public leader of Queen. Just as one could easily call John Deacon the leader of the business end of Queen... Freddie was the leader of the band. |
The Real Wizard 02.06.2005 02:20 |
Scott, gotta agree with everything you've said. |
deleted user 02.06.2005 05:05 |
I think that in this world of to day everybody needs everybody... and as much Brian, Roger and John needed Freddie, as much Freddie needed Brian, Roger and John... Everyone has his personality and talent... He was a great performer, but he needed the people around him... As much I need the bin man who just got my dirtbag away... As far the concert Queen + PR it can't be compared to anything else... It is diffrent, does not mean it's bad... In any case BAD or GOOD are words who lays in the mind of people and is owned by them personality... like many other words, I LIKE or NOT, BEAUTIFULL or UGLY....The glass is HALF FULL or HALF EMPTY Question: WHAT WOULD YOU DO IF YOU WERE QUEEN? I can have more than a 1 000 000 answers cause everyone has diffrent mind about it... And the way you think you will react in time is not always how you will react by fact when things are standing before you! The fact is: What is, IS! And arguing about this is not going to change the fact that the remaining Queens have decided to have this tour and neither the fact that many of the tour dates have been sold out... I had the chance to see them at the Hall of Fame and I can tell you it was a kind of magic moment that made me cary away... (That's for me and nobody has to agry and I respect if you think it wasn't as this is your meaning) |
Fenderek 02.06.2005 05:19 |
Suddenly a ridiculous wind-up thread became an interesting read. Usually it's other way round... ;) |
kingogre 02.06.2005 06:25 |
There is a lot of speaking about Queen as a performing band, no doubt about that Freddie Mercury was a huge part of the band live and and definitely the main reason for Queens popularity as a live act. Even though both Brian and Roger are fine performers and John solid as a rock, they pale in comparison to Freddie as do almost everybody(although david Lee roth, Steven Tyler or Elvis IMHO probably would have offered some serious competition) What I am thinking about is how Queen as a recording and creative band is in many ways a result of the meeting of the talents of Freddie & Brian. Both of which are extremely talented and original musicians. |
Fenderek 26.09.2005 05:58 |
Decided to dig it up as a prove that BPP has no brains... If THAT was the best thing he read for years... wow... |
deleted user 26.09.2005 06:17 |
LOL... How hard did you have to dig... to get it... |
rockit22 26.09.2005 12:34 |
Silly topic! Queen never was a one-man band. Actually they were 4 guys writing the songs. Even FM said that! He said he was not the leader of the band! If you take away all the songs written by Brian, Roger and John, you will see what is left..! It is their music, and their work, so they can do whatever they want, and don't have to listen to silly comments! Besides, it is THEIR job, not yours!! Disrespectful??! Come on, give me a break for heavens sake!! I see it as a gift to all the fans! |
deleted user 26.09.2005 13:10 |
rockit22 wrote: Silly topic! Queen never was a one-man band. Actually they were 4 guys writing the songs. Even FM said that! He said he was not the leader of the band! If you take away all the songs written by Brian, Roger and John, you will see what is left..! It is their music, and their work, so they can do whatever they want, and don't have to listen to silly comments! Besides, it is THEIR job, not yours!! Disrespectful??! Come on, give me a break for heavens sake!! I see it as a gift to all the fans!welcome to the club! actualy fenderek has launched it back a while ago to be sarcastic... it wasn't ment to be serious, but it gave a lot of stuff to write for the zoners here... |