What are you talking about Brian looks OOOLLLDDD!
Rodger looks ok, but I just hope they get a mordern
costume designer, because its sortof hard trying to pitch queen as the best band in the world, when Brian's sitting there strumming his guitar in his butt-ugly shiny vest! *UGGHH* (cringes)
<font color=#FF399> Linda Of The Valley wrote: Who cares if Roger and Brian look old!! They are old!! Leave them alone!! Everyone goes on about how old and fat Roger is getting-they have every right to be at that age!! :P
Ditto Linda....you can't halt the ageing process. They're all over 55...Brian being the olderst born 19/07/47. It's genetic....some people age quicker than others but who really cares!!
Roger Taylor looks older than Brian when it's actually the other way around.
Brian looks young for his age - he dosen't look 57 or whatever his age is. He only looks like he is in his mid 40s.
Old? They don't look old - just older than when I first took notice to them - 30 years ago. You must either been in your teens or your early 20's. Younger people these days think that anybody over 35 is old. Why? That's a disgrace. Everybody has to show some signs of aging at some point (um, except Dick Clark - do you youngsters even know who he is?)
I was born in the 60's...and I certainly don't look my age (don't act it for that matter, either) But, I'm sure that some of you would probably think me a dinosaur.
Remember this - growing old is mandatory - growing up is optional.
Because Paul have brown hair maybe?
I know Roger is a little bit old, but he look so nice.
Because Roger is getting older, are he still the same indside!
Kisses Carina
Why does Paul Rodgers look so young?
1. He's got a very young girlfriend
2. He's had a face-lift
3. He's got a toupet
(And that's the honest truth!)
deleted user 09.02.2005 12:09
NTL wrote: I remember watching Paul Rogers on TOTP 2 about 3-4 years ago and quite strangely he was bald(ish), he now appears to have a full head of hair ?.
He has been spotted browsing in Brian's wig shop on Fleet Street.
Paul Rodgers seems to look younger than he did several years ago. His hair has changed too.
Roger looks pretty tired from recent photos, hopefully it was just a bad day.
At the end of the day, none of them are in bad shape for their ages (mid 50s).
I don't know how Paul looks so young -
not that he is that old.
Roger, on the other hand, looks a bit weathered.
Not that I care what he actually looks like,
he just doesn't seem like someone with enough energy to be a drummer on a rock tour.
That is the only concern I have and I think
the idea was already discussed to death in another thread.
I just watched "Gibson Night of 100 guitars" which Paul Rogers and Queen performed at, and I must say, Pauls hair ............or lack of it then, just proves that he must be wearing a "rug" on his head (toupe in other words) or has the world's best comb-over job -
LOL
Ahhh but don't matter, so long as he sings OK !!
I think paul looks like that guy Steve whats his face that won crappy x factor. Roger may look old but he still has that mischievious sparkle in his eye and Brian has the best smile ever...they still look mighty fine in my books....xxx
jeroen wrote: Why does Paul Rodgers look so young?
1. He's got a very young girlfriend
2. He's had a face-lift
3. He's got a toupet
(And that's the honest truth!)
jeroen wrote: Why does Paul Rodgers look so young?
1. He's got a very young girlfriend
2. He's had a face-lift
3. He's got a toupet
(And that's the honest truth!)
Surgery!
Really! I saw him perform live in Summer 1993 at Merriweather Post Pavilion in Columbia, Maryland USA pushing his "Tribute To Muddy Waters" record.
He looked like crap then. Old, overweight, thinning hair. Now 12 years later, he looks "Young"..right...