Nitroboy 21.07.2014 07:09 |
So this just went up on the QueenOfficial channel, and...... It's interlaced :( The audio however sounds awesome if you ask me! |
Holly2003 21.07.2014 09:11 |
There isn't anything about that which isn't totally wonderful. They really were a kick-ass rock band back then. |
rocknrolllover 21.07.2014 09:17 |
Holly2003 wrote: There isn't anything about that which isn't totally wonderful. They really were a kick-ass rock band back then.without any doubt, you are right! |
Self Made Man 21.07.2014 09:20 |
I think the mix is going to be much different on the final version, just like Bohemian Rhapsody's mix on Hungarian Rhapsody was, when they uploaded it on their youtube channel few weeks before release. That version, which was available in 1080p - has been taken down when they released HR on youtube in it's entirety. Anyway, I think cymbals are way too loud, and i'm pretty sure that master tapes are not in the perfect shape, just listen to bass drum. But I'm still going to love this release. |
Vocal harmony 21.07.2014 10:45 |
Self Made Man wrote: Anyway, I think cymbals are way too loud, and i'm pretty sure that master tapes are not in the perfect shape, just listen to bass drum. But I'm still going to love this release.How can you make judgments on fine sound detail on listening to something via the internet. The signal is compressed to hell, unless your listening at a decent volume on good sized speakers and from a medium that doesn't require the ends of the sound spectrum to be flattened your view, both as a listener, and a commentator will always be some what compromised. |
Self Made Man 21.07.2014 11:42 |
Vocal harmony wrote: How can you make judgments on fine sound detail on listening to something via the internet.When everything sounds decent but bass drum, then it's definitely not a compression thing. But I hope I'm wrong. |
brENsKi 21.07.2014 12:06 |
you know - i never really liked this song too much back in the old days (74/75) - but I LOVE THIS !!! f*cks sake - that's amazing - i don't care how many overdubs were done either back then or now - it still sounds much better than the original cinema release hearing this it makes you wonder how all that hard rocking talent evolved in a mish-mash of synths and 80s crap |
rocknrolllover 21.07.2014 12:32 |
brENsKi wrote: you know - i never really liked this song too much back in the old days (74/75) - but I LOVE THIS !!! f*cks sake - that's amazing - i don't care how many overdubs were done either back then or now - it still sounds much better than the original cinema release hearing this it makes you wonder how all that hard rocking talent evolved in a mish-mash of synths and 80s crapCompletely agree! |
rocknrolllover 21.07.2014 12:35 |
I hope Freddie's speech between songs will be presented complete form! |
GinjaNinja 21.07.2014 17:03 |
Nitroboy wrote: So this just went up on the QueenOfficial channel, and...... It's interlaced :(It's not interlaced, and I'm fairly sure YouTube automatically deinterlaces footage anyway. More to the point, why would it be bad if it was interlaced? The source material is interlaced, so I would hope for an interlaced release. What we should be unhappy about, is that it is 29.97 fps (i.e NTSC) rather than in its original frame rate. |
DragonflyTrumpeter83 21.07.2014 18:01 |
Just amazing! I defy anyone who claims that they get the same feeling from listening to AL sing this as when Freddie sang it. It's just not possible. Anyone who claims that AL sounds good singing this song is either taking the piss or just simply delusional. |
99jaystang 21.07.2014 19:01 |
I miss the rattle of the old snare mix :( but love the low freq of the bass drum that adds a different punch to the gig. Plus can't wait for the March gig. which will be great (audio wise) |
MadTheSwine73 21.07.2014 20:03 |
This is awesome. Can't wait for the full release! |
winterspelt 21.07.2014 23:08 |
Of course it doesnt sound the same. This gig was recorded 40 years ago, line up has changed, they are not young kids anymore. They are in their 60's and even if John and Freddie were alive and playing in the current tour, they would never sound like 40 years ago. God, you cant even compare Queen in 1974 to Queen in 1984 and they are a totally different band! |
winterspelt 21.07.2014 23:09 |
Double post |
lemonysnick123 21.07.2014 23:53 |
rocknrolllover wrote: I hope Freddie's speech between songs will be presented complete form!I was thinking the same thing. I hope those nasty old edits have been taken care of. |
Wijnand 22.07.2014 02:09 |
Oh no... My neighbours are gonna hate me during September I guess... |
rocknrolllover 22.07.2014 02:18 |
Wijnand wrote: Oh no... My neighbours are gonna hate me during September I guess...Why so? They hate old rock, or they hate Queen? |
The Real Wizard 22.07.2014 02:23 |
DragonflyTrumpeter83 wrote: Just amazing! I defy anyone who claims that they get the same feeling from listening to AL sing this as when Freddie sang it. It's just not possible. Anyone who claims that AL sounds good singing this song is either taking the piss or just simply delusional.Umm, the fact that you think you're seeing people say they like Lambert as much as Mercury just might mean that you're the one who's delusional. At most, people are simply defending Brian and Roger's right to exist with a different singer and not be subjected to a lynch mob for defecting from the Mercurial religion held by some. As for the video itself - I'm surprised nobody has mentioned it, but there are no vocal overdubs present ! |
rocknrolllover 22.07.2014 02:28 |
The Real Wizard wrote:Are you sure?DragonflyTrumpeter83 wrote: Just amazing! I defy anyone who claims that they get the same feeling from listening to AL sing this as when Freddie sang it. It's just not possible. Anyone who claims that AL sounds good singing this song is either taking the piss or just simply delusional.Umm, the fact that you think you're seeing people say they like Lambert as much as Mercury just might mean that you're the one who's delusional. At most, people are simply defending Brian and Roger's right to exist with a different singer and not be subjected to a lynch mob for defecting from the Mercurial religion held by some. As for the video itself - I'm surprised nobody has mentioned it, but there are no vocal overdubs present ! |
inu-liger 22.07.2014 04:06 |
rocknrolllover wrote:I'll refer it to Gregsynth for a second opinion, but I personally trust Bob's word, the man DOES run a certain popular live website and is more of an expert when it comes to Queen's live concerts than your left nut could probably ever hope to be.The Real Wizard wrote:Are you sure?DragonflyTrumpeter83 wrote: Just amazing! I defy anyone who claims that they get the same feeling from listening to AL sing this as when Freddie sang it. It's just not possible. Anyone who claims that AL sounds good singing this song is either taking the piss or just simply delusional.Umm, the fact that you think you're seeing people say they like Lambert as much as Mercury just might mean that you're the one who's delusional. At most, people are simply defending Brian and Roger's right to exist with a different singer and not be subjected to a lynch mob for defecting from the Mercurial religion held by some. As for the video itself - I'm surprised nobody has mentioned it, but there are no vocal overdubs present ! |
inu-liger 22.07.2014 04:10 |
By the way, I've noticed a trend in newer live mixes or re-mixes of classic Queen live releases put out in the last decade or so where they're really putting more emphasis on letting John's bass tones shine much more, if not have a more raw feel which IMO is a great thing. |
rocknrolllover 22.07.2014 04:30 |
inu-liger wrote:I can not help agree with you. I also trust Bob because he knows what he tells.rocknrolllover wrote:I'll refer it to Gregsynth for a second opinion, but I personally trust Bob's word, the man DOES run a certain popular live website and is more of an expert when it comes to Queen's live concerts than your left nut could probably ever hope to be.The Real Wizard wrote:Are you sure?DragonflyTrumpeter83 wrote: Just amazing! I defy anyone who claims that they get the same feeling from listening to AL sing this as when Freddie sang it. It's just not possible. Anyone who claims that AL sounds good singing this song is either taking the piss or just simply delusional.Umm, the fact that you think you're seeing people say they like Lambert as much as Mercury just might mean that you're the one who's delusional. At most, people are simply defending Brian and Roger's right to exist with a different singer and not be subjected to a lynch mob for defecting from the Mercurial religion held by some. As for the video itself - I'm surprised nobody has mentioned it, but there are no vocal overdubs present ! |
Rick 22.07.2014 04:45 |
inu-liger wrote: By the way, I've noticed a trend in newer live mixes or re-mixes of classic Queen live releases put out in the last decade or so where they're really putting more emphasis on letting John's bass tones shine much more, if not have a more raw feel which IMO is a great thing.I love what John does starting from 1:59 in the video. Great version, great sound. September can't come fast enough. |
rocknrolllover 22.07.2014 04:57 |
If I correctly understand stone cold crazy clip from 20.11.1974. It's pity that not from 19.11.1974, although it doesn't matter now. |
BradMay 22.07.2014 19:44 |
My goodness, some people on here are a bunch of wacky old whiners. We're FINALLY getting a nice 70s concert on a Blu-Ray disc! And STILL some people are complaining. " Oh no, listen to the bass drum, master tapes are damaged" FFS it's a 40 year old recording, everything gets sóme damage over time. " It's from the 20th not the 19th " So freaking what? It's STILL Rainbow '74 we're getting in 35mm quality! " It doesn't have overdubs" Who gives a crack? I mean, come on... Of Course it's great to have something without overdubs but, the thing that comes to mind is "Shine A Light" that Rolling Stones concert movie thingy, that was released on DVD WITHOUT OVERDUBS, it was the most sloppy performance Keith Richards ever gave in front of camera's but you dont hear people complain about that? (Allthough there really are a couple of dents in some places) Because it's pure and raw. Listen to Live At Wembley will ya? A lot of songs are overdubbed, vocals/guitars, stuff like that, HOWEVER, John's Bass Guitar is out of tune during Tear It Up. BUT, They DID Melodyne Freddie's vocals on One Vision at the Friday gig. But still, it's a fantastic concert by a fantastic group, overdubs or not, 40 years old or not, from this date or that date, who gives a crap. You people would find something to hate about if Brian May would release the Knebworth Footage from the Big Screen because " There's too much Close-up's of Freddie " or something. |
rocknrolllover 22.07.2014 23:31 |
BradMay wrote: My goodness, some people on here are a bunch of wacky old whiners. We're FINALLY getting a nice 70s concert on a Blu-Ray disc! And STILL some people are complaining. " Oh no, listen to the bass drum, master tapes are damaged" FFS it's a 40 year old recording, everything gets sóme damage over time. " It's from the 20th not the 19th " So freaking what? It's STILL Rainbow '74 we're getting in 35mm quality! " It doesn't have overdubs" Who gives a crack? I mean, come on... Of Course it's great to have something without overdubs but, the thing that comes to mind is "Shine A Light" that Rolling Stones concert movie thingy, that was released on DVD WITHOUT OVERDUBS, it was the most sloppy performance Keith Richards ever gave in front of camera's but you dont hear people complain about that? (Allthough there really are a couple of dents in some places) Because it's pure and raw. Listen to Live At Wembley will ya? A lot of songs are overdubbed, vocals/guitars, stuff like that, HOWEVER, John's Bass Guitar is out of tune during Tear It Up. BUT, They DID Melodyne Freddie's vocals on One Vision at the Friday gig. But still, it's a fantastic concert by a fantastic group, overdubs or not, 40 years old or not, from this date or that date, who gives a crap. You people would find something to hate about if Brian May would release the Knebworth Footage from the Big Screen because " There's too much Close-up's of Freddie " or something.We're just discussing. Agree there are people who are unhappy something, but there are people who are happy. I'm happy enough with this release. |
queenuruguay 23.07.2014 00:00 |
This is simply amazing! Hope this is the first of a bunch of releases coming in the next few years. I can't wait till September!!!!! |
DragonflyTrumpeter83 24.07.2014 05:12 |
BradMay wrote: You people would find something to hate about if Brian May would release the Knebworth Footage from the Big Screen because " There's too much Close-up's of Freddie " or something.Actually Brian would never consider releasing the Knebworth footage for that main reason. Too much Freddie. You know how he gets when he's playing a solo and the camera isn't on him... He gets kinda peeved and actually I don't blame him. When a guitarist is playing a solo live, I like to see it. Not the singer dancing on the side of the stage. |
inu-liger 24.07.2014 05:52 |
BradMay wrote: " It's from the 20th not the 19th " So freaking what? It's STILL Rainbow '74 we're getting in 35mm quality!Rainbow was recorded on videotape, not 35mm |
bootLuca 24.07.2014 06:55 |
inu-liger wrote:Brian said that Rainbow was one of 3 concerts captured in FILMBradMay wrote: " It's from the 20th not the 19th " So freaking what? It's STILL Rainbow '74 we're getting in 35mm quality!Rainbow was recorded on videotape, not 35mm |
inu-liger 24.07.2014 07:25 |
bootLuca wrote:He was wrong. Have a look below, this Blu-ray is an UPCONVERTED "high def" release (or as Eagle Rock Entertainment puts it, "SD Blu-ray") http://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Queen-Live-at-the-Rainbow-74-Blu-ray/106368/ http://www.blu-ray.com/news/?id=14249inu-liger wrote:Brian said that Rainbow was one of 3 concerts captured in FILMBradMay wrote: " It's from the 20th not the 19th " So freaking what? It's STILL Rainbow '74 we're getting in 35mm quality!Rainbow was recorded on videotape, not 35mm Queen, Virgin Records, and Eagle Rock Entertainment has officially announced that it will release on SD Blu-ray Queen: Live at the Rainbow '74. The release will be avaialble for purchase on September 9th. |
Nitroboy 24.07.2014 07:29 |
bootLuca wrote:inu-liger wrote:Brian said that Rainbow was one of 3 concerts captured in FILMBradMay wrote: " It's from the 20th not the 19th " So freaking what? It's STILL Rainbow '74 we're getting in 35mm quality!Rainbow was recorded on videotape, not 35mm Which has been busted several times to not be true. |
inu-liger 24.07.2014 07:31 |
And if you watch closely in that SCC preview video, there are instances of microphony artifacting which you ONLY get with analog video cameras. That's not something you'd get on a film recording, and also certainly not something they'd add in post-production either! http://www.michaeldvd.com/Articles/VideoArtefacts/VideoArtefactsMicrophony.html |
rocknrolllover 24.07.2014 09:17 |
inu-liger wrote: And if you watch closely in that SCC preview video, there are instances of microphony artifacting which you ONLY get with analog video cameras. That's not something you'd get on a film recording, and also certainly not something they'd add in post-production either! http://www.michaeldvd.com/Articles/VideoArtefacts/VideoArtefactsMicrophony.htmlAnd what this'll give to us? |
bootLuca 24.07.2014 09:49 |
inu-liger wrote:You're right: Rainbow will be released in SD Bluray...bootLuca wrote:He was wrong. Have a look below, this Blu-ray is an UPCONVERTED "high def" release (or as Eagle Rock Entertainment puts it, "SD Blu-ray") http://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Queen-Live-at-the-Rainbow-74-Blu-ray/106368/ http://www.blu-ray.com/news/?id=14249inu-liger wrote:Brian said that Rainbow was one of 3 concerts captured in FILMBradMay wrote: " It's from the 20th not the 19th " So freaking what? It's STILL Rainbow '74 we're getting in 35mm quality!Rainbow was recorded on videotape, not 35mmQueen, Virgin Records, and Eagle Rock Entertainment has officially announced that it will release on SD Blu-ray Queen: Live at the Rainbow '74. The release will be avaialble for purchase on September 9th. wasn't this concert filmed to be seen in cinemas? and what about the "Cinema reels 35mm film rip" uploadeded by Ghostwithasmile? |
pittrek 24.07.2014 09:55 |
The concerts were shot and edited on VIDEOTAPE. The edited version was later transferred to 35mm film for the theatrical release. Same thing was done in the 60's and the 70's quite often in the UK - see Doctor Who |
pittrek 24.07.2014 09:57 |
The Real Wizard wrote:Really? I didn't compare it yet to the previous versions but if you're correct, that's great!DragonflyTrumpeter83 wrote: Just amazing! I defy anyone who claims that they get the same feeling from listening to AL sing this as when Freddie sang it. It's just not possible. Anyone who claims that AL sounds good singing this song is either taking the piss or just simply delusional.Umm, the fact that you think you're seeing people say they like Lambert as much as Mercury just might mean that you're the one who's delusional. At most, people are simply defending Brian and Roger's right to exist with a different singer and not be subjected to a lynch mob for defecting from the Mercurial religion held by some. As for the video itself - I'm surprised nobody has mentioned it, but there are no vocal overdubs present ! |
bootLuca 24.07.2014 10:06 |
pittrek wrote: The concerts were shot and edited on VIDEOTAPE. The edited version was later transferred to 35mm film for the theatrical release.Ok thank you! Can I ask you what is the source of this information? |
lemonysnick123 24.07.2014 14:44 |
inu-liger wrote: And if you watch closely in that SCC preview video, there are instances of microphony artifacting which you ONLY get with analog video cameras. That's not something you'd get on a film recording, and also certainly not something they'd add in post-production either! http://www.michaeldvd.com/Articles/VideoArtefacts/VideoArtefactsMicrophony.htmlThis is quite interesting. I was always curious as to why you get those lines on video tape. They appear quite a bit in concert footage, so loud noise is to blame I guess. |
pittrek 24.07.2014 15:03 |
bootLuca wrote:Which information? I thought it's common knowledge.pittrek wrote: The concerts were shot and edited on VIDEOTAPE. The edited version was later transferred to 35mm film for the theatrical release.Ok thank you! Can I ask you what is the source of this information? 1) My eyes - it looks like video, not like film 2) There is a video tape editor mentioned at the end of the VHS 3) It has lots of typical video problems, e.g. the microphony effect as mentioned by inu 4) And of course it was converted to 35mm for theatrical release, cinemas don't have VCRs. Plus at least one person has a 35mm print, which he shared here 5) And I think either Gary or Greg mentioned it too |
The Real Wizard 24.07.2014 15:53 |
BradMay wrote: My goodness, some people on here are a bunch of wacky old whiners. We're FINALLY getting a nice 70s concert on a Blu-Ray disc! And STILL some people are complaining. " Oh no, listen to the bass drum, master tapes are damaged" FFS it's a 40 year old recording, everything gets sóme damage over time. " It's from the 20th not the 19th " So freaking what? It's STILL Rainbow '74 we're getting in 35mm quality! " It doesn't have overdubs" Who gives a crack? I mean, come on... Of Course it's great to have something without overdubs but, the thing that comes to mind is "Shine A Light" that Rolling Stones concert movie thingy, that was released on DVD WITHOUT OVERDUBS, it was the most sloppy performance Keith Richards ever gave in front of camera's but you dont hear people complain about that? (Allthough there really are a couple of dents in some places) Because it's pure and raw. Listen to Live At Wembley will ya? A lot of songs are overdubbed, vocals/guitars, stuff like that, HOWEVER, John's Bass Guitar is out of tune during Tear It Up. BUT, They DID Melodyne Freddie's vocals on One Vision at the Friday gig. But still, it's a fantastic concert by a fantastic group, overdubs or not, 40 years old or not, from this date or that date, who gives a crap. You people would find something to hate about if Brian May would release the Knebworth Footage from the Big Screen because " There's too much Close-up's of Freddie " or something.I fully agree with the general sentiment of your post. Indeed, some people will never be pleased. But you can't expect people not to dig into the juicy details beforehand, since they'll be talking about the content itself after it's released.. ! |
The Real Wizard 24.07.2014 15:55 |
bootLuca wrote:How about this - a photo of a TV camera at the show !pittrek wrote: The concerts were shot and edited on VIDEOTAPE. The edited version was later transferred to 35mm film for the theatrical release.Ok thank you! Can I ask you what is the source of this information? link And anything shown in a movie theatre in the 70s had to be transferred to a film reel. |
99jaystang 24.07.2014 19:35 |
There was a ton of microphony during Live Aid, just about when Brian's guitar kicked in Bo Rhap , when Freddie sings "MAMA!" Peter Hince said Trip Khalaf did the sound the whole day and crank the sound levels just for Queen. |
Nitroboy 26.07.2014 08:55 |
To those claiming it's not interlaced... Take a look at Roger when he's drumming for instance, it's quite obvious. |
GinjaNinja 26.07.2014 09:42 |
Nitroboy wrote: To those claiming it's not interlaced... Take a look at Roger when he's drumming for instance, it's quite obvious.It really isn't, there's no combing to be seen. It looks slightly "faster" than usual because it's been converted to a higher frame rate, but is not interlaced. Hopefully (and most likely) the actual physical release will contain interlaced video. |
Chief Mouse 26.07.2014 11:24 |
GinjaNinja wrote:Nitroboy wrote: To those claiming it's not interlaced... Take a look at Roger when he's drumming for instance, it's quite obvious.It really isn't, there's no combing to be seen. It looks slightly "faster" than usual because it's been converted to a higher frame rate, but is not interlaced. Hopefully (and most likely) the actual physical release will contain interlaced video. If you watch this video fullscreen you can see it is 1080i. Lines blend together if you view it in the youtube video box. So yeah, Nitroboy has a point. https://www.mediafire.com/convkey/0ddf/u42ct3e4temy9dc7g.jpg" border="0" alt="Simple, Free Image and File Hosting at MediaFire" /> |
GinjaNinja 26.07.2014 12:15 |
How strange! Here is how appears in full screen for me: http://i.imgur.com/I9fFngA.png" title="Hosted by imgur.com" /> |
Chief Mouse 26.07.2014 12:52 |
Well, you have to click 1080p to see this. I suppose you don't have a 1080p monitor. |
GinjaNinja 26.07.2014 14:00 |
Chief Mouse wrote: Well, you have to click 1080p to see this. I suppose you don't have a 1080p monitor.Nah my monitor's >1080p, it's just YouTube not giving me the option in this case. Found the 1080p version using KeepVid, does look interlaced. My apologies Nitroboy! (I still don't understand why interlacing should be a bad thing though...) |
Chief Mouse 26.07.2014 14:35 |
GinjaNinja wrote:Chief Mouse wrote: Well, you have to click 1080p to see this. I suppose you don't have a 1080p monitor.Nah my monitor's >1080p, it's just YouTube not giving me the option in this case. Found the 1080p version using KeepVid, does look interlaced. My apologies Nitroboy! (I still don't understand why interlacing should be a bad thing though...) Weird you don't get to choose the 1080p version :P Well to be honest I would either prefer it to be progressive or double fps progressive. Because (I don't know how it's with Blu-Ray players) the player deinterlaces on the fly with some fast setting so it can render real-time meaning it's not really the best quality - jaggies and perhaps flickering. At least this happens with DVDs that I play on PC. |
Self Made Man 26.07.2014 17:33 |
BradMay wrote: " Oh no, listen to the bass drum, master tapes are damaged" FFS it's a 40 year old recording, everything gets sóme damage over time.Yeah, it's perfectly obvious that analog recordings are going to lose their quality through the years. I'm just saying what I've noticed, that's all. And I actually said that it's still gonna be a great release, just for being Rainbow. Take it easy man, Stop All The Fighting, right? |
rocknrolllover 27.07.2014 02:30 |
In my opinion you're paying attention on the technical aspects of a future release when the most important thing that for the first time since 1992, this concert will be released in full. Hurray ! |
Nitroboy 27.07.2014 06:18 |
It's been 40 years since these Rainbow concerts, they're only now just being released in their full length - I think most people think that they might as well do it right the first time. |
inu-liger 27.07.2014 06:42 |
rocknrolllover wrote:In my opinion you're paying attention on the technical aspects of a future release when the most important thing that for the first time since 1992, this concert will be released in full. Hurray !On the plus side, at least this'll be one less concert we'll have to put up seeing you whine and troll about endlessly for its release |
rocknrolllover 27.07.2014 06:52 |
inu-liger wrote:No, from this day i'm starting trolling and whining on account of the concert in Hyde Park, which is kind of not going to release.rocknrolllover wrote:In my opinion you're paying attention on the technical aspects of a future release when the most important thing that for the first time since 1992, this concert will be released in full. Hurray !On the plus side, at least this'll be one less concert we'll have to put up seeing you whine and troll about endlessly for its release |
Nitroboy 27.07.2014 08:39 |
So it seems to me the interlacing only occurs at 1080p, everything below that and YouTube deinterlaces it? |
Toozeup 27.07.2014 08:41 |
Everything on Box of Tricks was from the 20th right? Has any footage from the 19th been ever been released? I have heard recordings but never seen any video. |
BETA215 27.07.2014 08:57 |
Toozeup wrote: Everything on Box of Tricks was from the 20th right? Has any footage from the 19th been ever been released? I have heard recordings but never seen any video.The video you have seen is a compilation/mix from both nights. |
Chief Mouse 27.07.2014 09:00 |
Nitroboy wrote: So it seems to me the interlacing only occurs at 1080p, everything below that and YouTube deinterlaces it? Yes, it seems like that. |
bootLuca 04.08.2014 07:09 |
I have compared the shots of the new source with those of the old one, they are identical except at the point where Freddie begins to sing the 2nd verse: in the old version the camera was framing Roger, then the same camera turns to Freddie who is about to start the verse in the new version they have shortened the frame of Roger then they changed the camera framing freddie for a moment before he started the verse... much better! :-) |
Nitroboy 04.08.2014 09:59 |
bootLuca wrote: I have compared the shots of the new source with those of the old one, they are identical except at the point where Freddie begins to sing the 2nd verse: in the old version the camera was framing Roger, then the same camera turns to Freddie who is about to start the verse in the new version they have shortened the frame of Roger then they changed the camera framing freddie for a moment before he started the verse... much better! :-) Excellent observation, I was wondering if there were new edits or different shots being used for this release :) |
lemonysnick123 04.08.2014 10:40 |
bootLuca wrote: I have compared the shots of the new source with those of the old one, they are identical except at the point where Freddie begins to sing the 2nd verse: in the old version the camera was framing Roger, then the same camera turns to Freddie who is about to start the verse in the new version they have shortened the frame of Roger then they changed the camera framing freddie for a moment before he started the verse... much better! :-)Nice catch dude! I didn't notice that. I hope they made changes to in the lap of the gods revisited. The camera stays on his hands for a while. |
MackMantilla 04.08.2014 12:29 |
bootLuca wrote: I have compared the shots of the new source with those of the old one, they are identical except at the point where Freddie begins to sing the 2nd verse: in the old version the camera was framing Roger, then the same camera turns to Freddie who is about to start the verse in the new version they have shortened the frame of Roger then they changed the camera framing freddie for a moment before he started the verse... much better! :-)Good point! |