Richard Orchard 05.11.2008 08:56 |
QUEEN founders BRIAN MAY and ROGER TAYLOR always approach former bandmate JOHN DEACON before they plan a tour or live project, in the hope the bassist will rejoin the group. Deacon has refused to take part in Queen activity for more than a decade, and wants no part of the band's ongoing reunion tour with former Free star Paul Rodgers fronting the group. In his place, Rodgers, May and former Blue Oyster Cult star Danny Miranda provide bass on the group's new record and live. But May and Taylor have never given up on their former bandmate. May says, "Whenever we tour, we always put a little feeler out and say, 'Perhaps you might be interested, John.' But he's not." Source: link |
masterstroke_84 05.11.2008 10:03 |
Danny doesn't play bass on the album... There is even a bass on it?? xD |
pjheath5 05.11.2008 12:44 |
From what I have read in the past and recently, John Deacon wants nothing more to do with the music industry. He is content living with his family. |
john bodega 05.11.2008 12:49 |
John Deacon is dead. I'm not surprised he doesn't answer the call. |
AmeriQueen 05.11.2008 13:16 |
It's funny how saying Miranda plays on the album automatically makes this article complete B.S.! |
hermenegildo 05.11.2008 13:34 |
I think Richard means May and Rodgers play bass on the album and Miranda plays bass on tour... |
masterstroke_84 05.11.2008 13:52 |
"former Blue Oyster Cult star Danny Miranda provide bass on the group's new record and live." |
Drums 05.11.2008 14:02 |
Bit dissapointed in John Deacon. Queen Were John, Roger, Brian and Freddie. Freddie (Im sure) would still be there if he had the chance. John for me has let the side down a little. Im pleased Brian and Roger keep offering him the chance. Hopefully one day he will return! |
Major Tom 05.11.2008 15:09 |
Brian, Paul and even Roger is playing bass on The Cosmos Rocks. But mostly Brian, if i read it right :) |
brENsKi 05.11.2008 17:21 |
Drums wrote: Bit dissapointed in John Deacon. Queen Were John, Roger, Brian and Freddie. Freddie (Im sure) would still be there if he had the chance. John for me has let the side down a little. Im pleased Brian and Roger keep offering him the chance. Hopefully one day he will return! whatever gave you that idea about Freddie? He made no secret of the fact that he was not going to go on forever...he was even fed up with the cycle of album-tour-album-tour |
glentoran 05.11.2008 17:55 |
John is probably the most sensible Member of Queen He realised that Queen were an amazing foursome...just not the same with one peice of the jigsaw missing |
Penetration_Guru 05.11.2008 17:57 |
masterstroke_84 wrote: "former Blue Oyster Cult star Danny Miranda provide bass on the group's new record and live." Well, yes, if you quote half a sentence it becomes inaccurate. Well done. |
vadenuez 05.11.2008 18:24 |
I had a wonderful time in high school but at this stage of my life I wouldn't want to return there at all. I believe it's the same with John. If right now he is where he wants to be, then why go on tour? |
masterstroke_84 05.11.2008 19:33 |
Penetration_Guru wrote:masterstroke_84 wrote: "former Blue Oyster Cult star Danny Miranda provide bass on the group's new record and live."Well, yes, if you quote half a sentence it becomes inaccurate. Well done. Its not "half" its all the sentence... and Its wrong... period. |
doxonrox 05.11.2008 20:06 |
masterstroke_84 wrote:Penetration_Guru wrote:Its not "half" its all the sentence... and Its wrong... period.masterstroke_84 wrote: "former Blue Oyster Cult star Danny Miranda provide bass on the group's new record and live."Well, yes, if you quote half a sentence it becomes inaccurate. Well done. The whole sentence = "In his place, Rodgers, May and former Blue Oyster Cult star Danny Miranda provide bass on the group's new record and live. But May and Taylor have never given up on their former bandmate." You were saying, Masterjoke? |
doxonrox 05.11.2008 20:08 |
Drums wrote: Bit dissapointed in John Deacon. Queen Were John, Roger, Brian and Freddie. Freddie (Im sure) would still be there if he had the chance. John for me has let the side down a little. Im pleased Brian and Roger keep offering him the chance. Hopefully one day he will return! Your disappointed in him for having a life outside of Brian's latest money grab? Who's letting "the side down"? Can't wait for We Are the Champions the Musical... |
atg2001 05.11.2008 23:18 |
brENsKi wrote:the whole 'getting tired of album-tour' cycle was patently just a cover for him not being physical able to tour anymore.Drums wrote: Bit dissapointed in John Deacon. Queen Were John, Roger, Brian and Freddie. Freddie (Im sure) would still be there if he had the chance. John for me has let the side down a little. Im pleased Brian and Roger keep offering him the chance. Hopefully one day he will return!whatever gave you that idea about Freddie? He made no secret of the fact that he was not going to go on forever...he was even fed up with the cycle of album-tour-album-tour Even though Queen would have likely stopped touring full-time at or soon after the Magic tour regardless of his health, I think they'd have still done live shows and mini-tours in the future. |
onevsion 05.11.2008 23:35 |
brENsKi wrote:Drums wrote: Bit dissapointed in John Deacon. Queen Were John, Roger, Brian and Freddie. Freddie (Im sure) would still be there if he had the chance. John for me has let the side down a little. Im pleased Brian and Roger keep offering him the chance. Hopefully one day he will return!whatever gave you that idea about Freddie? He made no secret of the fact that he was not going to go on forever...he was even fed up with the cycle of album-tour-album-tour He only said that because he knew he was ill.... |
john bodega 06.11.2008 00:00 |
Ducksoup wrote: He only said that because he knew he was ill.... I guess he told you this, then? You're probably half right, but to be fair they were at it for a long long time in the scheme of things. |
Bo Rhap 06.11.2008 03:04 |
If for some unknown reason a miracle happened and Freddie came back,thats when John would come back.Unless ofcourse the paychecks dry up. |
sandicom 06.11.2008 05:45 |
for roger and brian music is life, for john was just job. |
TheCosmosRocks 06.11.2008 08:04 |
Brian & Roger are giving John the chance to Tour with them but he refuses. It may be that John doesn't like the fact that Paul Rodgers has joined the group. |
atg2001 06.11.2008 08:13 |
I think it's quite obvious there was a HUGE falling out between John and the other two. He was perfectly happy to be associated with and even on occasion perform with Queen until 1997. I doubt we will ever know what the falling out consisted of. Perhaps there was a lot of bad blood over the No-One But You single which I think we made around that time. Maybe John felt that without Freddie, who was traditionally his "ally" in the band and the guy who he'd work with closely on his own material, that he no longer stood a chance with Brian and Roger. Brian and Roger today would NEVER agree to the heavily-based influence stuff that Deacon had submitted in the past which only really occurred in the first place because Freddie fought for Queen to go down that road. We also know that him and Brian clashed many times in the studio over the sound of Brian's guitar and how it didn't suit certain songs and Deacon insisted it be altered to do so (notably on I Want To Break Free). Perhaps without Freddie there he felt that he could never win any future fight or argument so thought that there was little point carrying on as his influence over the other two would be minimal and he wouldn't really have creative input anymore. Certainly I think the departure wasn't entirely amicable and reading between the lines I think it's clear some tension and resentment exists on both sides. |
Holly2003 06.11.2008 08:25 |
atg2001 wrote: I think it's quite obvious there was a HUGE falling out between John and the other two. He was perfectly happy to be associated with and even on occasion perform with Queen until 1997. I doubt we will ever know what the falling out consisted of. Perhaps there was a lot of bad blood over the No-One But You single which I think we made around that time. Maybe John felt that without Freddie, who was traditionally his "ally" in the band and the guy who he'd work with closely on his own material, that he no longer stood a chance with Brian and Roger. Brian and Roger today would NEVER agree to the heavily-based influence stuff that Deacon had submitted in the past which only really occurred in the first place because Freddie fought for Queen to go down that road. We also know that him and Brian clashed many times in the studio over the sound of Brian's guitar and how it didn't suit certain songs and Deacon insisted it be altered to do so (notably on I Want To Break Free). Perhaps without Freddie there he felt that he could never win any future fight or argument so thought that there was little point carrying on as his influence over the other two would be minimal and he wouldn't really have creative input anymore. Certainly I think the departure wasn't entirely amicable and reading between the lines I think it's clear some tension and resentment exists on both sides. I don't think that's clear at all. As for the other person who said that John treated this "as a job" , can you provide anything like a reasoned argument to support that assertion? |
boca 06.11.2008 08:38 |
Man who didn't play for more then 10 years certainly doesn't like music like Brian and Roger...I can't imagine someone stops playing... |
Ms. Rebel 06.11.2008 14:50 |
Damn right he's not answering to those two bitches. |
andy1962 09.11.2008 13:53 |
i think that john is right to say no as QUEEN WERE freddie,john,brian & roger,now freddie as gone QUEEN are no more a band. people should respect john in what he wants to do a fucking leave him alone |
christine sales 09.11.2008 15:20 |
I think that John's wishes should be respected. No one knows what has happened in the past and to speculate is unwise. Good luck to him in the future and thanks for all the happiness his contributions to Queen have given me in the past. |
Marcos Napier 09.11.2008 15:51 |
If by just retiring (doesn't he have the rights to do so the same way as Brian and Roger can make a new band?) he is getting such criticism, I can imagine if he had joined another band without the other two what could be the names he would be called for that. |
gregos 10.11.2008 01:35 |
i would love john to play again with queen. he's the best thing about queen music. his bass playing me the best life high. john you are the best |
new one 10.11.2008 05:06 |
I aggree that John should be left alone to enjoy life outside the glare of queen if he so desires. I also aggree with someone earlier who said that there must have been a pretty big falling out. Brian and Roger are always pretty vague when asked about John and have said regularly that they havn't spoken in a couple of years. I think if I was in Johns shoes and had retired but the others were continuing with my blessing then I would probably call them or something to wish them well on there tour or maybe release some sort of statement in order to help them give the project a bit more legitamacy. Now I'm not saying john hasn't called them but if he had then I'm pretty sure Brian and Roger would mention it instead of saying they never speak to him. Also its a little odd that the guy who interviewed QPR at Rogers home over lunch mentioned the little figures of the band that Roger has on a shelf somewhere but for some reason there is no figure of John(Perhaps hes just mislaid it??). I know that would be pretty petty for a grown man but it did strike me as odd considering there was one of Freddie, Rog and Bri. Thats why I don't feel let down by John not being involved with this project as I believe there is more to it than meets the eye. Perhaps one day if Brian does an autobiography we will get some sort of explanation however distorted that explanation may be. |
Barbie Jupiter 10.11.2008 10:29 |
if they make him tour with them someday, that would be really awesome. I still hope. And expect at least three tours yet from Queen:] |
Holly2003 10.11.2008 12:36 |
new one wrote: I aggree that John should be left alone to enjoy life outside the glare of queen if he so desires. I also aggree with someone earlier who said that there must have been a pretty big falling out. Brian and Roger are always pretty vague when asked about John and have said regularly that they havn't spoken in a couple of years. I think if I was in Johns shoes and had retired but the others were continuing with my blessing then I would probably call them or something to wish them well on there tour or maybe release some sort of statement in order to help them give the project a bit more legitamacy. Now I'm not saying john hasn't called them but if he had then I'm pretty sure Brian and Roger would mention it instead of saying they never speak to him. Also its a little odd that the guy who interviewed QPR at Rogers home over lunch mentioned the little figures of the band that Roger has on a shelf somewhere but for some reason there is no figure of John(Perhaps hes just mislaid it??). I know that would be pretty petty for a grown man but it did strike me as odd considering there was one of Freddie, Rog and Bri. Thats why I don't feel let down by John not being involved with this project as I believe there is more to it than meets the eye. Perhaps one day if Brian does an autobiography we will get some sort of explanation however distorted that explanation may be.Sorry this is nonsense. They have little to say about John because there is, in fact, nothing TO say. How many different ways are there to say "he's retired"? If he's not doing anything except sitting at home with his feet up, then there is no news about him worth talking about. No one is being evasive, unless you want to hear more reports of John walking his dog or reading the Daily mail. It's not exactly out of character for him either in that he's always been the 'quiet one' in the band. But now that he's retired you seem to expect that he should be more in the spotlight than he was when in the band when every bit of common sense suggest the opposite. As for your remark about a John Deacon figure - bloody hell, talk about grasping at straws! lol |
new one 10.11.2008 14:59 |
Holly2003 wrote:new one wrote: I aggree that John should be left alone to enjoy life outside the glare of queen if he so desires. I also aggree with someone earlier who said that there must have been a pretty big falling out. Brian and Roger are always pretty vague when asked about John and have said regularly that they havn't spoken in a couple of years. I think if I was in Johns shoes and had retired but the others were continuing with my blessing then I would probably call them or something to wish them well on there tour or maybe release some sort of statement in order to help them give the project a bit more legitamacy. Now I'm not saying john hasn't called them but if he had then I'm pretty sure Brian and Roger would mention it instead of saying they never speak to him. Also its a little odd that the guy who interviewed QPR at Rogers home over lunch mentioned the little figures of the band that Roger has on a shelf somewhere but for some reason there is no figure of John(Perhaps hes just mislaid it??). I know that would be pretty petty for a grown man but it did strike me as odd considering there was one of Freddie, Rog and Bri. Thats why I don't feel let down by John not being involved with this project as I believe there is more to it than meets the eye. Perhaps one day if Brian does an autobiography we will get some sort of explanation however distorted that explanation may be.Sorry this is nonsense. They have little to say about John because there is, in fact, nothing TO say. How many different ways are there to say "he's retired"? If he's not doing anything except sitting at home with his feet up, then there is no news about him worth talking about. No one is being evasive, unless you want to hear more reports of John walking his dog or reading the Daily mail. It's not exactly out of character for him either in that he's always been the 'quiet one' in the band. But now that he's retired you seem to expect that he should be more in the spotlight than he was when in the band when every bit of common sense suggest the opposite. As for your remark about a John Deacon figure - bloody hell, talk about grasping at straws! lol I was just being light hearted about the JD figure, sorry if you picked me up wrong. Listen, I don't want there to be a problem with John and the rest but I just feel that there is more to it than Bri and Roger let on. As for him being retired, I've said on many occasions on here that I fully accept that and we should leave him alone. All I was doing was expressing my opinion that perhaps the reason for his retirement was due to differances with Roger or Brian or both. I certainly don't think it has anything to do with Paul Rodgers as someone suggested as I'm pretty sure he'd stopped working with them befor Paul came on the scene. I just think it would be interesting to hear his reasoning behind his retirement, after all he's not exactly an old man is he? Perhaps a reason for his retirement has been announced and I've not heard it, is this the case? And I also find it odd that these guys who conquered the world together suddenly don't have any real contact with their friend for a couple of years at a time. Thats certainly not how I behave with people I have worked closely with over the years, apart from the ones I've fallen out with. But hey we're all different I suppose. Perhaps the reason behind it doesn't make you curious? Fair enough. But I just can't help wondering and then in turn speculating which I suppose is human nature. Don't get me wrong I'd love to see JD back but to be honest I'm not that bothered if he doesn't as we still have a working band in QPR with or without him. Its more just morbid curiosity on my behalf. And yes I do remember what it did to the cat!! |
MrBadGuy_Mike 10.11.2008 16:14 |
reguards to the stop touring after freddie knew he was ill... i remember seeing too seperate interviews one during the release of i want it all and one after the release of innuendo and brian said on both interviews he was itching to get back out on tour and do a couple of shows but also said on both interviews freddie had different ideas on what to do and he only wanted to concentrate on making new albums for the forseable future |
Holly2003 10.11.2008 16:35 |
MrBadGuy_Mike wrote: reguards to the stop touring after freddie knew he was ill... i remember seeing too seperate interviews one during the release of i want it all and one after the release of innuendo and brian said on both interviews he was itching to get back out on tour and do a couple of shows but also said on both interviews freddie had different ideas on what to do and he only wanted to concentrate on making new albums for the forseable future Brian only said those things to protect Fred from the Press. Fred knew he was dying at that point and the band were putting on a front of 'life as normal'. There was no chance of another tour and Brian and the band knew it. |
MrBadGuy_Mike 10.11.2008 17:05 |
maybe so but i think Brian really wanted to reguardless |
April 10.11.2008 17:10 |
Why can't you understand that the simple reason for John's staying away is that he just doen't want to join the band. He is happy in his life and doesn't want to repeat the experience. If he had fallen out with the guys , Brian wouldn't have called on him to join them up. John is happy, John is tired of publicity, maybe John is old, maybe like the other John (Lennon) but way back, he wants to devote himself to children and grandchildren. I am sure he wouldn't be with them now, it's too late to accept the invitation... |
Holly2003 10.11.2008 17:43 |
MrBadGuy_Mike wrote: maybe so but i think Brian really wanted to reguardless No there's no 'maybe' involved: it's well documented that the band were protecting Fred's privacy from the Press at this point and that any talk of a tour was just a smokescreen. Would Brian have liked to tour if Fred wasn't ill? Of course. |
arnulfiux 10.11.2008 20:41 |
Hola, pues es una lástima que Deacon no quiera participar, una lástima para la música de Queen, pues solo es necesario escuchar Return of the Champions para comenzar a extrañarlo. Por otra parte se nota muchísimo su ausencia en The Cosmos Rock, asi que creo que es respetable su decisión y tiene toda la razón en no querer participar, el proyecto es malísimo, por mi parte no pienso comprar The Cosmos Rock. Saludos a la banda. |
Veila 11.11.2008 20:34 |
I dont blame J.D. one bit. Queen is fred john brian roger..Think of it this way, say mick jagger had dropped dead 10 years ago and all of a sudden a few years later they wanted to tour etc, who would they get to sing??? I'm sorry but its the same way.. When people hear of queen they dont immediately have a visual picture in their minds of paul r, they think of Fred and the rest of the boys....Fred was the lead singer of Queen,and i feel its disrespectful to reform the band,/.. and to think they can get bad companys paul to sing lead.I am sorry but i grew up also listening to bc, and in no way does bc even come close to Queen at their high of their fame in the 70s.. anyway. why are they bothering?they have more money than god,.and with brian finally after all these years being able to finish his phd, he should have a go at that for the rest of his life..As said i dont blame J.D. for not wanting to have anything to do with them at all... |
wayne 1 12.11.2008 05:00 |
just maybe, john got sick of the music bis, and realised he now has a wonderful opportunity to enjoy his large, wonderful family after 25 years of album,tour,album,tour. i would love to see john rejoin queen, but i respect any decision he makes in relation to this. as for the current line up with rodgers not being queen, well i have commented on this in the passed, queen were always changing and moving staying one step ahead, staying fresh, their music changing through the years, and with rodgers i feel that this is exactly what they are doing. so if john and queen decide to reunite then wonderful, great, but if john wishes to remain enjoying his retirement then dont you think he has earned that right, and it is nobody's business except john and his family. |
...Bohemian... 12.11.2008 08:50 |
I totally agree with you, John: you're loyal to Freddie and the real Queen |
madeinheaven! 42122 12.11.2008 14:47 |
I wish John would come back and I think it's great that Brian and Roger keep asking him but I also respect his decision. If it was right for him that's all that matters. I do really want him to come back though. It's not the same without him. |
mscales 14.11.2008 13:50 |
Sorry for all of you Paul Rogers fans....you may want to look away.... I am a HUGE Queen Fan, and I mean HUGE! However, I have to say that I am sooooo dissapointed in the new album and Paul himself! I read that Freddie really always loved his voicce, that is his oppinion. I will always believe that Brian, Roger and John could have done this on their own without a new front man. The fact that Paul needed a teleprompter for their first tour was an insult to all Queen fans. You find 1 queen fan that can't sing all of the lyrics and then I will believe that he needed that! Funny enough, the telepromter turned off during his "Free" songs...so lame. I saw the telepromter because we were in the 9th row in NYC during their first US tour....they rocked, Paul sucked and honestly I refuse to buy the new album because of him and where the band has gone...it is just not the same anymore. I know that nobody can replace Freddie...so why not do that...no replacement! I understand if John is not playing anymore because of this reason....but Brian and Roger and the rest of the band BESIDES Paul...you guys kicked ass! |
April 14.11.2008 17:30 |
Thank Paul for agreeing to be the frontman. |
madeinheaven! 42122 16.11.2008 05:39 |
mscales wrote: Sorry for all of you Paul Rogers fans....you may want to look away.... I am a HUGE Queen Fan, and I mean HUGE! However, I have to say that I am sooooo dissapointed in the new album and Paul himself! I read that Freddie really always loved his voicce, that is his oppinion. I will always believe that Brian, Roger and John could have done this on their own without a new front man. The fact that Paul needed a teleprompter for their first tour was an insult to all Queen fans. You find 1 queen fan that can't sing all of the lyrics and then I will believe that he needed that! Funny enough, the telepromter turned off during his "Free" songs...so lame. I saw the telepromter because we were in the 9th row in NYC during their first US tour....they rocked, Paul sucked and honestly I refuse to buy the new album because of him and where the band has gone...it is just not the same anymore. I know that nobody can replace Freddie...so why not do that...no replacement! I understand if John is not playing anymore because of this reason....but Brian and Roger and the rest of the band BESIDES Paul...you guys kicked ass! I'm not a PR fan but I do think you're being really unfair. I think he's really brave to be able to sing in front of all of Freddie's fans. He's doing a great job and I wish people would stop comparing him to Freddie because he's just different. When you can sing as well as him then I think you have a right to complain. None can ever be as good as Freddie but at least he's making an effort so just leave him alone!! Without him there'd be no Queen anymore!!! |
Misty Rose 16.11.2008 20:59 |
I didn't read the entire string so pardon me if this is a repeat but....I would have gone to the "after Freddie' Queen concert IF...the singer sounded like Freddie. I think Mika or Robbie Williams would have been a better result. Both of these singers are actually Queen/Freddie fans, too. I never liked either Free or Bad Company so Paul Rodgers just wouldn't have been my choice. Thank you for reading. |
nature_grrl 17.11.2008 00:56 |
I do miss the sound that Deacy added to Queen. But from the interviews I've read it sounds like he just doesn't think Queen is complete without Freddie. Still, I am surprised that he didn't show up for the Rock and Roll Hall Of Fame induction. |
Lillypillyfarrokhfan 18.11.2008 04:15 |
I think John realised that with the death of Freddie, it was inevitable that they'd split. He was probably exhausted from all the tours of the 80's and wanted to enjoy his millions. I think he's smart, that he got out when he did. Look at Rolling Stones, tragic!!! They all look like they just stepped out of the Dawn of the Dead set!! I don't think Queen + PR is Queen anymore, rather two Queen members, who formed another band with two other blokes. |
ChileanQueenLover 26.11.2008 22:39 |
My dear John... You can not even imagine how much I miss you... :( |
Brian_Mays_Wig 27.11.2008 04:05 |
arnulfiux wrote: Hola, pues es una lástima que Deacon no quiera participar, una lástima para la música de Queen, pues solo es necesario escuchar Return of the Champions para comenzar a extrañarlo. Por otra parte se nota muchísimo su ausencia en The Cosmos Rock, asi que creo que es respetable su decisión y tiene toda la razón en no querer participar, el proyecto es malísimo, por mi parte no pienso comprar The Cosmos Rock. Saludos a la banda. You know, I was just thinking that myself! |
Treasure Moment 27.11.2008 06:19 |
John is smart, he knows there is no point even trying to continue with "Queen" without freddie, its a joke that they are even trying. Continue playing but dont use the Queen name. |
lalaalalaa 29.11.2008 21:42 |
Treasure Moment wrote: John is smart, he knows there is no point even trying to continue with "Queen" without freddie, its a joke that they are even trying. Continue playing but dont use the Queen name. Stupid statement! You call it a joke that they are trying to continue for their fans that never saw Queen with Freddie but they try to at least let them see part of the Queen experience? Also, they are not using the Queen name. They are using Queen+Paul Rodgers. They used +Paul Rodgers to symbolize that it was not going to be the same but they are still going. |
Michael Allred 01.12.2008 03:28 |
Misty Rose wrote: I didn't read the entire string so pardon me if this is a repeat but....I would have gone to the "after Freddie' Queen concert IF...the singer sounded like Freddie. I think Mika or Robbie Williams would have been a better result. Both of these singers are actually Queen/Freddie fans, too. I never liked either Free or Bad Company so Paul Rodgers just wouldn't have been my choice. Thank you for reading. So go see a fucking tribute band. Brian and Roger are artists who want to create something NEW. I swear the mindset of Queen "fans" is ridiculous. |
new one 01.12.2008 08:26 |
Michael Allred wrote:Misty Rose wrote: I didn't read the entire string so pardon me if this is a repeat but....I would have gone to the "after Freddie' Queen concert IF...the singer sounded like Freddie. I think Mika or Robbie Williams would have been a better result. Both of these singers are actually Queen/Freddie fans, too. I never liked either Free or Bad Company so Paul Rodgers just wouldn't have been my choice. Thank you for reading.So go see a fucking tribute band. Brian and Roger are artists who want to create something NEW. I swear the mindset of Queen "fans" is ridiculous. Couldn't aggree more, go see a tribute band some of them are qite good or put on a DVD but don't expect Paul Rodgers to impersonate Freddie and don't expect Brian and Roger to go on tour with a sound alike. God I mean they're getting enough stick for the QPR thing, what in the hell would be said if they went out with someone trying to be Freddie. BAD BAD BAD IDEA!!! |
Marcos Napier 01.12.2008 09:15 |
Also, they are not using the Queen name. They are using Queen+Paul Rodgers. They used +Paul Rodgers to symbolize that it was not going to be the same but they are still going. Excuse me, but what is written in the bass drum? Unless I lost my ability to read and join characters to form words, I still read "Queen" there. This thing reminds me of the "New Coke" or whatever are the new names they found for the same (haha) product. |
new one 01.12.2008 12:06 |
Marcos Napier wrote:Also, they are not using the Queen name. They are using Queen+Paul Rodgers. They used +Paul Rodgers to symbolize that it was not going to be the same but they are still going.Excuse me, but what is written in the bass drum? Unless I lost my ability to read and join characters to form words, I still read "Queen" there. This thing reminds me of the "New Coke" or whatever are the new names they found for the same (haha) product. If I'm not mistaken "NEW COKE" was a new product was it not? and was a disaster hence the launch of Coke "Classic" I might be wrong to be honest. Anyway of course it still says Queen on the bass drum. Roger is still a member of Queen or at least whats left of it. By the way Marco Napier, the guitar playing is coming along nice, fingers aren't as raw but crispy now. F is still a bitch mind you!! Thanks for your interest. |