| SomebodyWhoLoves 26.09.2008 04:17 |
Clearly, Brian May and Roger Taylor made a mistake to call their new band, "Queen + PR" because they are inviting comparisons to the Original Queen Legacy. IMO, they should've left the "Queen" name alone. That band is forever gone, now living in the Halls of Time as the Best Band ever. Instead, they should've announced the formation of a New Group Entirely. And called themselves: "Queen II" That way, people would know it's a new group entirely, but still has some link to their past. Queen II. I like it. |
| DrummerBoy | MMVIII 26.09.2008 05:06 |
"Queen (2 + 4)"...? no but seriously, Queen, Queen + PR, Bob the builder's rock revolution, they have the right to call them selves whatever they want . just be grateful that those who came too late to see the original, get a chance to see those who are left. my 2.5 cents worth |
| Erin 26.09.2008 09:27 |
Quodgers...that's what they shoulda gone with. ;-P |
| princetom 26.09.2008 09:47 |
'the noodles'. simple as that. |
| new one 26.09.2008 10:24 |
I thought the guy who started this thread said yeterday he was leaving Queenzone for good? Oh well I'm glad you didn't otherwise we may have never gotten the chance to take part in this facinating debate of why they are calling themselves Queen or why they are calling themselves Queen+ Paul Rodgers or Green Onions or Queen 2 or whatever? BORING!!!! |
| new one 26.09.2008 10:26 |
Erin wrote: Quodgers...that's what they shoulda gone with. ;-PThat could work!! Ladies and Gentlemen, please welcome on stage the one and only QUADGERS! Yip I like that |
| The Real Wizard 26.09.2008 10:30 |
How about... "SomebodyWhoLoves is a fucking twat and we can call ourselves whatever the hell we want because it's our fucking band that we created. Now take your over-christian and womanizing ass elsewhere, and don't slam the door on your way out, despite saying you'd leave, even though nobody cared." It has a nice ring to it, I think. |
| Erin 26.09.2008 10:31 |
^^Oh, snap! |
| new one 26.09.2008 10:32 |
Sir GH wrote: How about... "SomebodyWhoLoves is a fucking twat and we can call ourselves whatever the hell we want because it's our fucking band that we created. Now take your over-christian and womanizing ass elsewhere, and don't slam the door on your way out, despite saying you'd leave, even though nobody cared." It has a nice ring to it, I think.I can't help thinking that this thread was started to get a reaction such as that. Just ignore his topic and perhaps he will make good on his promise and leave. |
| The Real Wizard 26.09.2008 10:33 |
new one wrote: I can't help thinking that this thread was started to get a reaction such as that. Just ignore his topic and perhaps he will make good on his promise and leave.Hooray :) It seems everyone's feeding the trolls here lately, and I was feeling extra generous this morning. |
| DrummerBoy | MMVIII 26.09.2008 10:35 |
THE QUADGERS ROCKS !!! (an obvious pun) |
| MartynR90 26.09.2008 10:43 |
phoenix??? |
| Ray D O'Gaga 26.09.2008 11:00 |
SomebodyWhoLoves wrote: Clearly, Brian May and Roger Taylor made a mistake to call their new band, "Queen + PR" because they are inviting comparisons to the Original Queen Legacy. IMO, they should've left the "Queen" name alone. That band is forever gone, now living in the Halls of Time as the Best Band ever. Instead, they should've announced the formation of a New Group Entirely. And called themselves: "Queen II" That way, people would know it's a new group entirely, but still has some link to their past. Queen II. I like it.What an unfortunately brief exile. So calling it "Queen + Paul Rodgers" invites comparisons to the Original Queen Legacy (note the initial caps, Signifying Importance) but calling it "Queen II" doesn't. You're a moron. I'm sorry, I know its rude, but you're just a moron. |
| Micrówave 26.09.2008 11:06 |
SomebodyWhoLoves wrote: I'm leaving not because of any flames I've received here. Bye!Yeah, fucko, you're leaving. You think you could take your moronic ideas with you? Maybe BonJoviZone is hiring... |
| Treasure Moment 26.09.2008 11:08 |
Paul rodgers feat brian may and roger taylor, because thats what the new album sounds like. |
| Ray D O'Gaga 26.09.2008 11:17 |
Treasure Moment wrote: Paul rodgers feat brian may and roger taylor, because thats what the new album sounds like.You're also a moron. |
| Treasure Moment 26.09.2008 11:21 |
Ray D O'Gaga wrote:YOU are the moron who cant accept obvious facts.Treasure Moment wrote: Paul rodgers feat brian may and roger taylor, because thats what the new album sounds like.You're also a moron. |
| Josh Henson 26.09.2008 11:45 |
Treasure Moment wrote:I agree; this sounds nothing like May or Taylor. It's all Paul Rodgers w/ the other 2 helping out. Obviously, except for SINT.Ray D O'Gaga wrote:YOU are the moron who cant accept obvious facts.Treasure Moment wrote: Paul rodgers feat brian may and roger taylor, because thats what the new album sounds like.You're also a moron. |
| Dan C. 26.09.2008 13:18 |
I've always liked Queedgers myself... |
| Hitman1965 26.09.2008 13:53 |
Treasure Moment? |
| pittrek 26.09.2008 13:59 |
SomebodyWhoLoves wrote: Clearly, Brian May and Roger Taylor made a mistake to call their new band, "Queen + PR" because they are inviting comparisons to the Original Queen Legacy. IMO, they should've left the "Queen" name alone. That band is forever gone, now living in the Halls of Time as the Best Band ever. Instead, they should've announced the formation of a New Group Entirely. And called themselves: "Queen II" That way, people would know it's a new group entirely, but still has some link to their past. Queen II. I like it.TROLL TROLL TROLL Trollity TROLL TROLL TROLL Trollity TROLL TROLL TROLL Trollity TROLL TROLL TROLL Trollity TROLL TROLL TROLL Trollity TROLL TROLL TROLL |
| peterkoz1 26.09.2008 15:08 |
ps looked what happenned to ELO when Bev Bevan re-branded to ELO 2 skint and now a DJ and Part Time drummer with the rebranded Move playin to 200 people in working mens clubs round brum. and not to mention the rest of ELO playimg now as the Orkestra with some success at least to around 1000 people. I think only Jeff Lynne came out with any credibility however after the ELO 2 traversty he tried to re brand as original ELO and flopped with all concerts cancelled and an album which only equalled ELO2's chart position. My message is QPR is great keep up the karaoke with PR and so long as were treated to Roger and Brians acoustic trips then we are happy. A tour of mostly Cosmos Rocks and Brian and Roger stuff clearly identifiable from there queen days with a couple of classics chucked in would be great. My set List would be: Intro : Cosmos Rockin C- Lebrity Still Burnin Headlong (Brian & Paul Vocal) Call Me (band acoustic) 39 (band acoustic) Say its not true (Roger then Band ) some things that glitter bad company feel like makin love Interval: love of my life (brian vocal) another world (brian vocal) We believe (all band) Queen medley: Bohemian Rhapsody no middle Under Pressure Another one bites the dust A kind of Magic Radio Gaga (Roger & Paul Vocal) Seagull (Paul Acoustic) Small Warboys All right now Show must Go On Encore: Surfs Up schools out We Will Rock You We are the Champions God Save the Queen |
| bathump 26.09.2008 15:15 |
SomebodyWhoLoves wrote: Clearly, Brian May and Roger Taylor made a mistake to call their new band, "Queen + PR" because they are inviting comparisons to the Original Queen Legacy. IMO, they should've left the "Queen" name alone. That band is forever gone, now living in the Halls of Time as the Best Band ever. Instead, they should've announced the formation of a New Group Entirely. And called themselves: "Queen II" That way, people would know it's a new group entirely, but still has some link to their past. Queen II. I like it.I thought you were leaving. Queen II your having a laugh |
| bathump 26.09.2008 15:17 |
Treasure Moment wrote:I love your use of CAPITAL LETTERS. Do you use bold when you REALLY want to make a pointRay D O'Gaga wrote:YOU are the moron who cant accept obvious facts.Treasure Moment wrote: Paul rodgers feat brian may and roger taylor, because thats what the new album sounds like.You're also a moron. PS I expect an abusive reply. Probably in CAPITALS |
| Erin 26.09.2008 15:51 |
Dan Corson IX: Dark Blue wrote: I've always liked Queedgers myself...Queedgers totally sucks...;-P Quodgers all the way! |
| Oberon 26.09.2008 16:25 |
If Roger and Brian had done something just the two of them I always liked the idea of them calling it "Taylor May'd", so with Paul it would be "Taylor, May'd and Rodgered" ;-) |
| April 26.09.2008 16:28 |
Oberon wrote: If Roger and Brian had done something just the two of them I always liked the idea of them calling it "Taylor May'd", so with Paul it would be "Taylor, May'd and Rodgered" ;-)Wow! Great! The best name! |
| runner70 26.09.2008 16:39 |
Treasure Moment wrote:Go practicing with your crap band and fire that annoying singer. TReasure Moment = Biggest pile of shit in music historyRay D O'Gaga wrote:YOU are the moron who cant accept obvious facts.Treasure Moment wrote: Paul rodgers feat brian may and roger taylor, because thats what the new album sounds like.You're also a moron. |
| Ray D O'Gaga 26.09.2008 17:20 |
Erin wrote:You're both wrong! CLEARLY (see, I use all caps too when I want to use my big-boy voice) the most logical name for the band was ...Dan Corson IX: Dark Blue wrote: I've always liked Queedgers myself...Queedgers totally sucks...;-P Quodgers all the way! PUEEN! No? Okay, how about ... PAULEEN! |
| Ray D O'Gaga 26.09.2008 17:23 |
Treasure Moment wrote:P.S. YOU're still a moron :)Ray D O'Gaga wrote:YOU are the moron who cant accept obvious facts.Treasure Moment wrote: Paul rodgers feat brian may and roger taylor, because thats what the new album sounds like.You're also a moron. |
| Ray D O'Gaga 26.09.2008 17:28 |
Hadrian wrote:Obviously you're not listening hard enough :)Treasure Moment wrote:I agree; this sounds nothing like May or Taylor. It's all Paul Rodgers w/ the other 2 helping out. Obviously, except for SINT.Ray D O'Gaga wrote:YOU are the moron who cant accept obvious facts.Treasure Moment wrote: Paul rodgers feat brian may and roger taylor, because thats what the new album sounds like.You're also a moron. Listen harder, dammit! For people like this, pre-'91 Queen was Freddie Mercury w/ the other 3 helping out. |
| Micrówave 26.09.2008 17:40 |
Dr. Roger Rodgers |
| SomebodyWhoLoves 26.09.2008 17:48 |
Oberon wrote: If Roger and Brian had done something just the two of them I always liked the idea of them calling it "Taylor May'd", so with Paul it would be "Taylor, May'd and Rodgered" ;-)HAHA! That's very clever! That would be a HORRIBLE name, but it's very sly. :) |
| Raf 26.09.2008 18:04 |
runner70 wrote:What? Are you insinuating that Treasure Moment is actually #1 at something...?Treasure Moment wrote:Go practicing with your crap band and fire that annoying singer. TReasure Moment = Biggest pile of shit in music historyRay D O'Gaga wrote:YOU are the moron who cant accept obvious facts.Treasure Moment wrote: Paul rodgers feat brian may and roger taylor, because thats what the new album sounds like.You're also a moron. |
| Mr. Jordy 26.09.2008 22:57 |
Pueen. |
| L-R-TIGER1994 27.09.2008 01:58 |
Queen 50% |
| Saif 27.09.2008 06:09 |
Queers(Queen + Paul Rodgers)
Paul Queers of the 25th and a half century.
SomebodyWhoLoves wrote:Hey, did you forget to fellate yourself this morning? Mirror broken?Oberon wrote: If Roger and Brian had done something just the two of them I always liked the idea of them calling it "Taylor May'd", so with Paul it would be "Taylor, May'd and Rodgered" ;-)HAHA! That's very clever! That would be a HORRIBLE name, but it's very sly. :) |
| Danne 27.09.2008 07:45 |
Ray D O'Gaga wrote:I agree. Of course you can hear a lot of Paul Rodgers on this album, since he's the lead singer! However, if you listen a bit harder, you can clearly hear Roger's and Brian's presence, of course in the playing, but also in the material. Songs like "Surf's Up" is classic Roger Taylor, starts off like something from Strange Frontier, and ends up sounding like it would fit perfectly on Electric Fire - it's not hard to imagine Roger singing it (and his backing vocals really are obvious). And Brian is all over "Still Burnin'" and "We Believe", which sounds like a mix between "Las Palabras" and "Why Don't We Try Again" from Antother World.Hadrian wrote:Obviously you're not listening hard enough :)Treasure Moment wrote:I agree; this sounds nothing like May or Taylor. It's all Paul Rodgers w/ the other 2 helping out. Obviously, except for SINT.Ray D O'Gaga wrote:YOU are the moron who cant accept obvious facts.Treasure Moment wrote: Paul rodgers feat brian may and roger taylor, because thats what the new album sounds like.You're also a moron. |
| boffy 20.11.2008 01:34 |
The technically correct name would be something like (Queen / 2) + Paul Rodgers + 3 It's accurate, but not very catchy. I vote for Erin's "Quodgers", because I smile every time I say it. |
| lalaalalaa 20.11.2008 18:21 |
Ray D O'Gaga wrote:Erin wrote:You're both wrong! CLEARLY (see, I use all caps too when I want to use my big-boy voice) the most logical name for the band was ... PUEEN! No? Okay, how about ... PAULEEN!Dan Corson IX: Dark Blue wrote: I've always liked Queedgers myself...Queedgers totally sucks...;-P Quodgers all the way! Nahhh how about Rodgeen or Rodgeeners :P |
| david (galashiels) 20.11.2008 18:41 |
the paul rodgers trio.the brian may trio.the roger taylor trio.or..........queen+paul rodgers.sounds good. |
| boffy 20.11.2008 19:38 |
Paul Rog, Brian, Roger, Dan, Jamie & Spike |
| lalaalalaa 20.11.2008 19:42 |
hmmmm how about Queen+Chuck Norris look-a-like :D |
| akindofmagic 20.11.2008 20:07 |
peterkoz1 wrote:
A tour of mostly Cosmos Rocks and Brian and Roger stuff clearly identifiable from there queen days with a couple of classics chucked in would be great.
My set List would be:
Intro : Cosmos Rockin
C- Lebrity
Still Burnin
Headlong (Brian & Paul Vocal)
Call Me (band acoustic)
39 (band acoustic)
Say its not true (Roger then Band )
some things that glitter
bad company
feel like makin love
Interval:
love of my life (brian vocal)
another world (brian vocal)
We believe (all band)
Queen medley:
Bohemian Rhapsody no middle
Under Pressure
Another one bites the dust
A kind of Magic
Radio Gaga (Roger & Paul Vocal)
Seagull (Paul Acoustic)
Small
Warboys
All right now
Show must Go On
Encore:
Surfs Up schools out
We Will Rock You
We are the Champions
God Save the Queen
You're smart man! i wanted too a tour based on Cosmos Rocks, and Queen stuff that Bri and Roger could sing(Pressure, Too much love, No-One But You and some stuff From "...Heaven" such as Let me Live,Mother Love or heaven for everyone). Maybe some solo cuts like Driven By you or New dark ages(or Man on Fire) would be great. |
| greataddict 21.11.2008 03:45 |
I don't really care about how they wanna call themselves, as long as I can go to their show!! And I definitely think that material from their whole carreer could be played, Roger did some great stuff, that isn't known enough, imo... Some Cross material, for example... Could you imagine, Heaven for Everyone as a duett? Wouldn't it be nice? |
| john bodega 21.11.2008 05:40 |
The Beatles. |
| yogi 21.11.2008 12:42 |
How about "Trimming The Suckers" or "Shilling The Rubes"? |
| timantt1 21.11.2008 18:53 |
Back in time I proposed Paul Rodgers + (less than) half Queen But now I think better name would actually be Paul Rodgers + Queen - Freddie Mercury - John Deacon That would perfectly describe what it is :) |
| fmarsong 24.11.2008 03:58 |
call themselves..the survivors...or i dont know |