Queen Archivist 12.01.2007 19:53 |
Dear All I thought you might like to know that I have been working VERY hard, intensively labouring, I might tell you, and not remotely being lazy or idle - as so many of you believe me to be. I did 6 hours last week and 2 hours in the archive this week, ya got me! It's all go in my life. Ok, yes, I had my dinner hours and breaks too, but I still did a fair old bit last tuesday. Anyway, progress with the Queen box... I decided that you were right and I was wrong, and that Johnboy Stuart's ways and methods and crazily detailed and pedantic to the enth degree approach to Queen projects was INDEED the way to go. The ONLY way. I saw the light eventually. I managed to talk the band round too, and management. I confess, I have seen the error of my ways. I ask your collective forgiveness. Will you? Stu-pot Stuart from the Northly North had it right, and I had not a clue. Look... I shouldn't be telling you this yet, but... sneaky sneaky, an archive peaky... here is what Johnboy and I (mainly Johnboy) have come up with thus far for box 1. I had some great ideas, but JS's were much better so he went with them. So... so far. Box 1. QUEEN THE EARLY YEARS. Johnny Stu-pot Note: These 6 CDs cover only side 1 and a fraction of Side 2 of the first album, because we wanted to be as thorough as I've always insisted Greg and the boys needed to be. Without being conceited, the following greatness is mainly, if not solely and exclusively, my doing... CD 1: The First Album, First Track, First Morning of the First session, Trident 1972 1. Brian saying "Keep Yourself Alive, Take 1" [0:03] 2. Brian counting to 4. [0:04] 3. Roger asking if he can have his cans volume turned up a bit because he missed Brian's count (also featuring Mike Stone sneezing and Roy Baker saying "Bless you Mike" [0:11] 4. Brian counting to 4 (again), but this time for Take 2 [0:04] 5. The opening two lines of 'Keep Yourself Alive' Early Version [0:42] 6. Freddie asking why Take 2 broke down after only 2 lines and John saying "yes please" to a cup of tea [0:09] 7. Brian saying "Keep Yourself Alive, Take 4" [0:03] 8. Brian counting to 4. [0:04] 9. Roger asking if he can have his cans volume turned up a tiny bit more (also featuring John receiving his tea and thanking unknown girl for said beverage [0:12] 10. Tiny bit of 'Keep Yourself Alive' which Stu... Stu-pot found on the end of a tape, which goes "all you people kee...." before abruptly cutting out where the edit comes in the tape and something was taken out [0:02] 11. Brian asking for a pen [0:03] 12. Unknown girl saying "Yes love, here you are" [0:04] 10. Bit of 'Keep Yourself Alive' unused lyric, uttered by Freddie, from 2nd verse, which goes "all of you people" (with reberb) [0:02] 11. Tones. 50 mhz (for the Engineer to synch things up with) [0:06] 12. 'Great King Rat' opening two piano notes of discarded Take 7 (from Trident, 1972) [0:07] 13. D-major guitar chord rehearsal for an early version of Son & Daughter which Brian thought was crap, but it was on the end of a Slave tape [0:01] 14. Person unknown shreiking "How much?" six times (probably a Tape Op) [0:23] 15. Freddie singing the word "shrowd" instead of "crowd" (extract from Jesus) [0:01] 16. John thanking someone for something, and Brian tuning up in the background - probably for Jesus, or King Rat, or Keep Yourself Alive, or The Night Comes Down, maybe [0:14] CD 2: Liar (Misc Out-takes), Evening of the First session, about 8 O'clock Johny St Note: I am especially proud of this. Who needs that knob Greggeth B when you've got me collating this stuff like some God-type genius? 1. Liar (Out of tune piano bit, discarded in Aug 1971) [1.06] 2. Liar (Roger tuning drum and telling Roy he is doing so) [2.08] 3. Li (first sylubul of Liar uttered by Fred, but then he coughs and stops) [0:000000003] 4. Liar (bass |
Lester Burnham 12.01.2007 20:18 |
March 2008? Yeah right, I call bullshit. Queen always release big things closer to Christmas. NICE TRY GREG! Also, that's quite the chip on your shoulder ya got there, Greggy-poo. |
theCro 12.01.2007 21:18 |
what's this all 'bout? Is this the real life, is this just fantasy??? 2008????140 CD's??? 6 per year ?WTF? |
ern2150 12.01.2007 21:24 |
Jon Stuart you are not. Any of them. |
deleted user 12.01.2007 21:45 |
You are aware that the first disc of that collection totals no more than 2 minutes and 34 seconds right? |
David Jones 12.01.2007 22:16 |
Fucking hell, Greg. Cut down on the shandys mate! |
Boy Thomas Raker 12.01.2007 22:21 |
Greg is pathologically obsessed with John Stuart. |
Gr8 King Rat 12.01.2007 22:25 |
OK, that was a nice waste of time... |
Maz 12.01.2007 22:28 |
Say what you will about the Greg's latest cheap-shot (which it was), but I still had a big chuckle at this bit: Brian counting to 4. [0:04] Would be funnier if that track were 5 seconds long. |
ok.computer 12.01.2007 23:07 |
What really and truly worries me is that a few people up the page thought this was for real.... Anyway Greg...if you ARE Greg....stop typing this shite and get back to work. I retire in 2038 and my pension lump sum will be ready about that time....just as you begin pressing the <ahem> box sets. Milk it baybee...Queen obviously has loadsa dosh to keep you worthily in their employ. |
Lester Burnham 12.01.2007 23:10 |
ok.computer wrote: What really and truly worries me is that a few people up the page thought this was for real....Only theCro thought it was real. sweden_man and myself were being facetious. |
Serry... 13.01.2007 03:00 |
The builders came back to his home probably... |
Crezchi 13.01.2007 03:31 |
GB isn't even the Archivist anymore, he is the janitor. lol. Greg, go clean the loo! lol. Don't you just love the irony?! |
Back2TheLight 13.01.2007 03:49 |
Sweet!! That's good news that he isn't...but...who is now in charge of it?? I'm apparently not hip to all the news...but I'am happy that he's not in charge of it anymore. |
Back2TheLight 13.01.2007 03:49 |
Sweet!! That's good news that he isn't...but...who is now in charge of it?? I'm apparently not hip to all the news...but I'am happy that he's not in charge of it anymore. |
Jjeroen 13.01.2007 05:52 |
Hey! Greg's got the right to (try to) be funny as well! Bastards! Loved it - as always! ON top of that: I would even BUY such a box set if it were released! :-) |
cmsdrums 13.01.2007 07:16 |
although I was taken in by the topic title, as soon as I read the line about having worked all of 6 hours last week, I know what was coming.... dispapointing in a way, but still very funny. If anyone else had posted this, it would be laughed at by all, but simply because it's Greg I'm sure he'll get shot down in flames. Oh well, at least he's back on Queenzone! |
thomasquinn 32989 13.01.2007 07:52 |
Was this supposed to be funny? Greg, take lessons, please. |
john bodega 13.01.2007 08:17 |
It really says a lot that he'd put that much effort into a gag... a lousy one at that! A man cut from the same cloth as myself it seems. |
brENsKi 13.01.2007 10:11 |
how is it that Queen employ such a self-opinionated cretinous shithead? i sincerely hope they sack him...and get somebody in who CAN do the archiving job properly maybe then we would see some real anthologies...the beatles did there's in about 18months...queen have been dragging their heels since this piss-taker arrived |
WilliamFraser 13.01.2007 10:22 |
GB was sacked by Queen. Everyone knows I tell the truth, but my poor spelling has made me look stupid. So to be taken more serious, I have written this in MS Word first so that the spelling is right. Maybe now I can be taken more serious. Greg Brooks is a bully. The thread called Queen Anthology PART 1 (March 2008) is a good example, because he is not interested in the box set. He is only interested in rubbishing John Stuart, and that is bullying. But have you ever wondered why he is such a tosser? Well here is the answer. GREG WAS SACKED BY THE BAND. He will tell you he was not sacked because he never worked for them, that he was self employed and that self employed people cannot be sacked. But the truth is he was contracted to do a job, and that job is now over. And now that that job is over, they have no need of his services. They want nothing more to do with him. It is like employing a self employed electrician to do a job, then when his job is over it is over. But if he was any good you would take him back, but if he was poor at his job you would not hire him again. So in that way he has been sacked. He has no influence on future releases. He is just a has been. That is why he is a bully. He likes to be the big shot but he can’t be any more and that is because people in here like Serry Vietinhoff and John S. Stuart know more about Queen than he does, and they do not even work for the band. That is why he has to rubbish there work. And he has the cheek to call me childish. I know this because I have a friend of a friend who knows him, and he is the same in real life. All mouth and no trousers. I do not see why he is allowed to do this in here. He is a spammer and a troll, but a troll with a name. So why should he get off with this when others don’t. |
robbie 13.01.2007 12:11 |
It's a shame that they did'nt Track down brians alternative count in whic went up to 5 |
robbie 13.01.2007 12:13 |
It's a shame that they did'nt track down brians alternative count in which went up to 5 |
Dicky Heart 13.01.2007 13:07 |
He's a fake .. |
Sebastian 13.01.2007 14:01 |
No "sugar plum fairy" bit? Bugger! |
Crezchi 13.01.2007 15:20 |
No 'Surrender to the city'?? LOL |
Queen Archivist 13.01.2007 16:14 |
William Fraser... you are dull and very boring. But I don't need to tell you this because you already know it - MANY people, I see from previous postings on QZ, have pointed this out several times. You're not a greatly liked or admired person, are you. Never mind. You are what some people in the UK refer to as a THICKET. A girlfriend is what you need Bill, a new focus, something other than your right hand and your computer mouse. Tell me... have we ever met? If so, did I manage to stay awake while you waffled on as tediously as ever? I probably didn't and that's why you're on the attack, you silly boy. Zebonka... you lack a sense of humour BIG style, as well as an iota of class or style. Try to be funny occassionally, try to see things for the humour in them, yes even my posts here, instead of looking for the nasty aspect every time. It just too predictable from you, and really dull, like you. Surprise us all with something new and out of character. Go on, please. cmsdrums... YOU HAVE A BRAIN, AMONG THESE BRAINLESS ROBOT TYPES WHO CANNOT THINK FOR THEMSELVES OR BE ORIGINAL. cmsdrums wrote... although I was taken in by the topic title, as soon as I read the line about having worked all of 6 hours last week, I know what was coming.... dispapointing in a way, but still very funny. VERY FUNNY. OH INDEED. TAKE LESSONS BILL FRASER. YOU NEED TO GET A LOT MORE FUNNY AS QUICK AS YOU CAN MATE. TRUST ME, THIS IS TRUE. ASK THE PEOPLE WHO ALWAYS WHISPER IN YOUR COMPANY AND WHOM SEEM CURIOUSLY PLEASED WHEN YOU ANNOUNCE YOU ARE LEAVING. If anyone else had posted this, it would be laughed at by all, but simply because it's Greg I'm sure he'll get shot down in flames. SPOT ON. PREDICTABLE PEOPLE - ALWAYS THE SAME NAMES TOO - ALWAYS DO THE OBVIOUS... ZEBONKA, WILLY FRASER, OK.COMPUTER, ETC Oh well, at least he's back on Queenzone! ONLY FOR THIS WEEKEND CHUM, COZ I'M IN THE STUDIO LOGGING TAPES NEWLY GENERATED, AND THERE ARE GAPS TO FILL... SO I WIND UP SOME PEOPLE ON THIS SITE AND AS USUAL IT WORKS LIKE CLOCKWORK, AGAIN AS USUAL. WHERE ARE YOU BARBIE??? Jeroen... YOU ARE CORRECT TOO. THANK YOU. I LOVE IT WHEN PEOPLE ON HERE AGREE WITH ME AND GET THE JOKE, AS MUCH AS I LOVE GETTING THE BACKS UP OF THOSE WHO LOVE TO HATE ME. By the way.... Harry Potter's on TV at the moment, and it ain't as bad as I thought. Now take care of yourselves lovely QZ-ers. Even William (no mates or girlfriend) Fraser. Even you!!!! Better get back to the tapes. You'd like this stuff I think!!! xxxx |
Queen Archivist 13.01.2007 16:18 |
Come on jss, where is the response you are dying to paste? I bet you wrote your reaction last night and are on 3rd draft by now. Come on, stop honing it, stop revisiting, just get it said. I'll be back here later to see your QZ chums getting all offended on your behalf. You could give them something to beat me with, in the meantime... you know how you like to dig up ancient posts I wrote for QZ, in 1999 or 2002, and quote them years and years later. You might want to do that again. Zzzzzzzzzzz! Food has now arrived for us lovely chaps. I must away. Good evening GB fans..... |
kdj2hot 13.01.2007 16:24 |
Queen Archivist wrote: Come on jss, where is the response you are dying to paste? I bet you wrote your reaction last night and are on 3rd draft by now. Come on, stop honing it, stop revisiting, just get it said. I'll be back here later to see your QZ chums getting all offended on your behalf. You could give them something to beat me with, in the meantime... you know how you like to dig up ancient posts I wrote for QZ, in 1999 or 2002, and quote them years and years later. You might want to do that again. Zzzzzzzzzzz! Food has now arrived for us lovely chaps. I must away. Good evening GB fans.....Where's Greatest Video Hit III? That's all I wanna know. This thread is pretty childish too... I just started thinking about JSS posts and while it may be a somewhat humorous parody it is immature. |
Back2TheLight 13.01.2007 18:18 |
This guy is so full of himself...I was beginning to think it was just a seasonal thing, but apparently I was wrong...you are yesterday's news my conceited friend. |
Queen Archivist 13.01.2007 18:26 |
Bambams... No-one gives a shit what you think. |
Jay Mantis 13.01.2007 18:38 |
Queen Archivist wrote: Bambams... No-one gives a shit what you think.And you honestly think that people care about what you have to say then? Sorry but you're wrong, Greg. These kind of topics might be somewhat funny at first sight but you'll eventually be hated for it (if not already)... of course if this is what you want to accomplish then go right ahead. |
JacquesDaniels 13.01.2007 19:39 |
Damn. The first word of my post is "damn" simply because that's the only thought I could think of at first while reading yet another completely useless thread at QueenZone and yet witnessing WAY too many people not ignoring it, simply because it was started by a member named "Queen Archivist", who has not once been completely convincing of being either the bearer of the title "Queen Archivist" or even the suggested human name "Greg Brooks". How many times you people are going to reply to every obviously useless post just to waste your precious time while you can do something so much more substantial and useful, like for instance, sleep, eat, have sex, take a shit, or.. how about.. POST AN INTERESTING TOPIC FOR ONCE. Sorry folks, but I'm a long time Queenzone lurker and I do take some interest and pleasure in reading those VERY few useful and informative topics that occur every other millipercent of the time. THIS and other posts of this kind, are completely useless and everyone's just wasting time here. Come to think of it... one MIGHT think that this Greg Brooks fellow might actually have something more important, interesting and useful to do than to write a 3000+ words long (I didn't actually count it, but seemed long enough) post which contain nothing of anyone's interest, except a provocative title in contrast to the content, which obviously would make anyone here look through it. In order to make this post useful in some minor way to anyone, I'm just going to steal the opportunity to advertise my band once more, because the other post seemed to have gone either ignored or unnoticed. Go to myspace.com/jacquesdanielsproject and take a listen, thank you very much. |
theCro 13.01.2007 20:02 |
Gerg, you are boring, you are immature you don't deserve to work in QP you are moron you don't know anything about Queen at all you always want to be in the middle of attention if brian or roger would read all your posts here on QZ, they would FIRE you you suck! get a job, change underwears and get a LIFE! |
Crezchi 13.01.2007 21:46 |
Queen Archivist wrote: Bambams... No-one gives a shit what you think.Nobody gives a shit what you think either, grow up and act your age. What were you expecting? You made a funny, some thought it was stupid, you get what you get, you should be aware of that if you have been writing for years, correct? |
Reading Princess 14.01.2007 00:10 |
Greg the cunt. Living off other's success. Goes to bed at night wondering why life's passed him by. Hanging on to Queen's tails to validate his existance. File away those tapes you little man. |
Nathan 14.01.2007 04:35 |
I'd love to see Brian or Roger endorse a product like this. |
Nathan 14.01.2007 04:36 |
I'd love to see Brian or Roger endorse a product like this. |
Jjeroen 14.01.2007 07:11 |
Queen Archivist wrote: Jeroen... YOU ARE CORRECT TOO. THANK YOU. I LOVE IT WHEN PEOPLE ON HERE AGREE WITH ME AND GET THE JOKE, AS MUCH AS I LOVE GETTING THE BACKS UP OF THOSE WHO LOVE TO HATE ME. By the way.... Harry Potter's on TV at the moment, and it ain't as bad as I thought.Well, I'm afraid I have to disagree here. First time I saw him I already found him a boring, pathetic, narrowminded twat. His spells and potions should not be taken seriously but they are very dangerous nevertheless. They divide the kingdom and make all the inhabitants opponents which are all confused. My now-ex forced me to watch his braindead ramblings, and ever since I've been wanting to shove that broom up his ass. But he keeps coming back. Now he's back AGAIN - and with a very very dangerous new girlfriend even - he just frightens me. |
ok.computer 15.01.2007 14:55 |
Queen Archivist wrote: PREDICTABLE PEOPLE - ALWAYS THE SAME NAMES TOO - ALWAYS DO THE OBVIOUS... ZEBONKA, WILLY FRASER, OK.COMPUTER, ETC xxxxI'm a tad chuffed you remember me. I must really have stung you at some point. Actually this was my first post since 17 November 2006. This is because I fill my time with better things than pissing my day up the wall on a website. This response, for example...responding to your inanities takes all of 1min 45 secs. Time I will never get back granted, but a lot less time wasted than you in posting the shite you come out with. Adieu...til at LEAST March. Get back to your warm work, Worthless. |
Queen Archivist 16.01.2007 18:35 |
ok.computer.... Don't be flattered I remembered you... because I didn't. I simply reviewed the pages of this thread and used two names I know well, plus you - because you all 3 had the predictability thing in common. That's the oly reason. Sorry chum, wouldn't know you from Adam. You just happened on be there on Page 1. Ego-squashing, though, innit! |
Projector Freddie 16.01.2007 20:45 |
dont you people see that he was makign fun of john s stuart? Hes not serious |
ok.computer 16.01.2007 22:34 |
Queen Archivist wrote: ok.computer.... Don't be flattered I remembered you... because I didn't. I simply reviewed the pages of this thread and used two names I know well, plus you - because you all 3 had the predictability thing in common. That's the oly reason. Sorry chum, wouldn't know you from Adam. You just happened on be there on Page 1. Ego-squashing, though, innit!Actually if there's any ego being quashed, it is demonstrably yours. THE Queen Archivist? The one that's actually paid by the band? On a fansite? Engaging in less-than-witty badinage with mere fans? Defending an increasingly indefensible position, (that being, why the fuck aren't you working on the product instead of wasting your time in here)? As time goes on, and one actually wastes the time to consider it - it's a distraction from the ennui of insomnia, nothing more - I think the others may well be correct. I do believe we may have fallen for a very sick flamer. But just in case I happen to be wrong....GET BACK TO YOUR WARM WORK, WORTHLESS! And to clarify just WHY my name appears when yours does - I'M WAITING ON THE FUCKING MATERIAL YOU HAVE BEEN COCK-TEASING US WITH FOR WHAT-MUST-BE GOING ON FOR TEN YEARS! Adieu. |
deleted user 16.01.2007 23:44 |
Greg, I have always beleived in you, but stop trying to Miyamoto-san** queenzone. the wrecthed place is unfit of even N*sync fans, which is the lowest form of life on earth, next to g4 viewers. ** refers to Shiguru Miyamoto "upending the tea table" during the development of Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time. heres an idea for box sets. have ech yaer dedicated to an album divde th album in to 12 partsrelease a cd evry month withone part of the album. it would cover every aspect of the album. at the end of the year relese a special cardboard case for people who already bought the cds a dvd coving the entire album and a full box set containing all that years releases. simultaniously release a boxed set containg all of their live shows promoting that album that video is in exsistance of. this would be about 520$ of matierial total each yearmeaning 10 dollars a week even the poorest queenie could afford that. |
john bodega 17.01.2007 00:51 |
"Zebonka... you lack a sense of humour BIG style, as well as an iota of class or style." You lack any grasp of your own language. I have a great sense of humour. You're not funny, that's all. |
FriedChicken 17.01.2007 06:13 |
Lol great topic :D |
Nathan 17.01.2007 08:43 |
See Personal for my response. |
violonbleu 17.01.2007 12:39 |
I always ask myself here why so much people are fighting???Really is Queen at the origin of these fights?...Music should not be at the origin of so many fights and angry discussions. Music like Queen should bring peace and joy in the world. |
Sebastian 17.01.2007 13:03 |
NSYNC are brill! |
Suigi 17.01.2007 16:45 |
Greg, Why post a topic like this? I was hoping to see some ACTUAL release information about an ACTUAL box set coming in the near future! Instead, I see a mean-spirited joke pointed at some of the members of this board. Greg, you are the QUEEN ARCHIVIST. You have inside information, I'm assuming. You have been telling us about a box set for so long now. When are we going to see some concrete information and a tentative release date better than "When it's done"? I'm not trying to be mean-spirited, but I've gotten tired of it. |
Seven_Seas_Of_Rhye II 17.01.2007 20:49 |
Queen Archivist is not Greg. Yes,Greg makes mistakes and he's lazy as I've heard. But if it would be Greg he couldn't write so stupid posts... which don't have a deal with real suggestions/questions from us for The Box Set. All I hear is a man who's making fun of QZ'rs. That's all disgusting... |
Lester Burnham 17.01.2007 20:54 |
Seven_Seas_Of_Rhye II wrote: Queen Archivist is not Greg. Yes,Greg makes mistakes and he's lazy as I've heard. But if it would be Greg he couldn't write so stupid posts... which don't have a deal with real suggestions/questions from us for The Box Set. All I hear is a man who's making fun of QZ'rs. That's all disgusting...It's Greg. Trust me. |
Seven_Seas_Of_Rhye II 17.01.2007 20:54 |
I dreamed that real Greg Brooks came here and we all could give suggestions for The Box Set and could have a real conversation... |
Queen-Obsessed 17.01.2007 20:54 |
jeroen wrote: Hey! Greg's got the right to (try to) be funny as well! Bastards! Loved it - as always! ON top of that: I would even BUY such a box set if it were released! :-)Lol I totally agree this would be a cool set to own :D |
Jakobe 17.01.2007 20:56 |
Queen Archivist wrote: 2. Brian counting to 4. [0:04]I laughed at that a little. The rest was kind of dumb though. What puzzles me more than anything is where you get the time to write these long posts and even longer replies. |
bigV 18.01.2007 02:54 |
Gr8 King Rat wrote: OK, that was a nice waste of time...Ditto. V. |
emrabt 18.01.2007 09:07 |
lol i chuckled at 3, 9 and brian counting to 4 |
CHERRY 18.01.2007 09:53 |
This is Freaking HILLARIOUS!!!!! Greg, Thanks for giving me a good laugh. To all of you that are posting reply's like "Greg sucks" etc.. THANK YOU for an even BIGGER laugh. CONFLICT & IN FIGHTING MAKES THE BEST HUMOUR!!! all the best mike from toronto |
Nathan 18.01.2007 10:48 |
GREG BROOKS ANTHOLOGY VOL I (Release date tba) Tracklist for this double-disc release is as follows: 1. Archivist snoring in the archives (0.50) 2. Archivist playing pattycake with an imaginary friend (1.10) 2 and not quite a half - Huge pile of tapes collapses and Archivist says bad words (0.25) 3. Archivist rummaging through mountains of demos and unreleased songs (much background noise throughout, some titles are mentioned) (2.50) 3 and a half - Archivist making himself lunch in the archives (kettles and cuttlery can be heard as can a very big MMMMMMMMMMM) (1.15) 4. Archivist laughing at responses on QZ (2.10) 4 and a bonus - Archivist catches intruder in the archives and begins a Quiet Man-style fist fight (30.00) (A real gem this one) DISC 2 (Please note, the compiler who decided to remain annonymous because he is an insider can't count and started Disc 2 at number 5) 5. Archivist donning wig, sunglasses and fancy suit and singing Elvis songs (a real epic this one) (22.50) 5 and a little bit extra - Archivist blowing his nose loudly (0.10) 6. Archivist violently vomiting at ridiculous things said about Queen archives (warning, strong content) (1.30) 6 and a little bit extra - Telephone rings and Archivist answers it (2.35) Almost 7 but not quite there - Archivist announces his intention to build a tower out of archived material (0.20) 7. Archivist carefully pondering the Anthologies, carefully deciding what should go in and what should be left out (0.10) (PS - I could only get ten seconds of audio recording, then the tape went belly-up) Almost 7 but a little bit more - everyone in the archives has a huge cream pie fight and all the treasures are almost ruined (voice can be heard yelling: "You've gone too far this time Greg!") (11.25) 7 going on 8. - Archivist sings nursery rhymes to himself (2.00) 8. A big voice says COMING NEXT TIME ON GREG BROOKS ANTHOLOGY (0.03 or 0.04, I can't remember) Then A GREAT BIG FART A whole list of more surprises is read out. Tape then promptly cuts. |
The Real Wizard 18.01.2007 11:58 |
Absolutely brilliant, Jimmy! Just as funny as his... probably better! I was laughing pretty hard. |
Sebastian 18.01.2007 14:52 |
That's real humour! |
Donna13 19.01.2007 10:29 |
Happy New Year, Greg! I think you will get to work on some really interesting projects this year. Keep us up to date, please! |
Queen Archivist 20.01.2007 21:12 |
ok.computer... You are a first rate arsehole with no redeaming features or even a sense of humour. I pity you. I imagine you and and zebonka12 get on well together - you are both as dull and completely predictable as each other. You couldn't be impartial or balanced about me or anything to do with me, if your life depended on it. You only look for something shitty to say EVERY time, because you think with a huge chip on your shoulder. You are VERY tedious Mr. I don't mind people having a go at me... I'm used to it on this site from everyone who follows the lead of the person before them, like automatons, like clones, but you are ALWAYS so utterly predictable. Never anything original or refreshing or thought-provoking from you. Seriously... not ever. Can't you at least try sometimes??? Can't you at least think about this aspect of yourself? Give it serious thought and maybe see the truth in it. Try to be something, ANYTHING in fact, other than dull and... that word again, but it is the most fitting for you.... predictable. |
Queen Archivist 20.01.2007 21:13 |
Hi Donna. Same to you. H.N.Y. Hope 2007 is great for you. |
john bodega 20.01.2007 22:12 |
Queen Archivist wrote: ok.computer... You are a first rate arsehole with no redeaming features or even a sense of humour. I pity you. I imagine you and and zebonka12 get on well together - you are both as dull and completely predictable as each other. You couldn't be impartial or balanced about me or anything to do with me, if your life depended on it. You only look for something shitty to say EVERY time, because you think with a huge chip on your shoulder. You are VERY tedious Mr. I don't mind people having a go at me... I'm used to it on this site from everyone who follows the lead of the person before them, like automatons, like clones, but you are ALWAYS so utterly predictable. Never anything original or refreshing or thought-provoking from you. Seriously... not ever. Can't you at least try sometimes??? Can't you at least think about this aspect of yourself? Give it serious thought and maybe see the truth in it. Try to be something, ANYTHING in fact, other than dull and... that word again, but it is the most fitting for you.... predictable.(Belly Laugh. No really, a big one) For a man who's every post consists of 'stop being predictable', I find your thrilling essay on predictability to be a little..... stale, hypocritical. Possibly even amusing! Yawn Factory. Population = You. |
Queen Archivist 21.01.2007 19:18 |
Hey Zebonka12... who said of himself... I have a great sense of humour. You're not funny, that's all. Chummer... that is not for you to say. It's for other people to assess, you vane bugger. You just love yourself, pal!!! You are one of those people that believes yourself to be good looking, funny and irresistable to all females, in addition to your "great soh" aren't you!!! We can all imagine it. And you have many mirrors in your home. Talk about ego! And kidding one's self. Wakey wakey pal....back to the real world asap. |
john bodega 21.01.2007 22:03 |
"Chummer... that is not for you to say. It's for other people to assess, you vane bugger." Well... there's a number of them that agree. But I'll ignore that for a moment! "You just love yourself, pal!!!" Oh I love 'bits' of myself. I'm a realistic type of person Greg, there are bits of me I can't stand! "You are one of those people that believes yourself to be good looking, funny and irresistable to all females, in addition to your "great soh" aren't you!!! We can all imagine it. And you have many mirrors in your home." I have... one mirror. And I avoid it strenuously. I sure love bantering with you Greg, but this unadulterated fiction you seem to spit out like a sewer hole... it has to stop! Well it doesn't really... whatever tickles your pasty white fancy I guess. "Talk about ego! And kidding one's self. Wakey wakey pal....back to the real world asap." Oh... oh I am! I greatly enjoy my passtimes, the people I share them with, and quite often find a quiet moment to enjoy the finer things like a sunset or the odd afternoon nap. I never said I was irresistible to women :P NOW who's making shit up?? |
Lester Burnham 21.01.2007 22:12 |
Zebonka12 wrote: I sure love bantering with you Greg, but this unadulterated fiction you seem to spit out like a sewer hole...I hope you don't still receive its kiss! |
john bodega 21.01.2007 22:52 |
Dr. Perry Cox wrote:After such a love as this?? No way!Zebonka12 wrote: I sure love bantering with you Greg, but this unadulterated fiction you seem to spit out like a sewer hole...I hope you don't still receive its kiss! Actually one of my favourite passtimes is trying to figure out what the hell Roger is singing during the 2nd 'lost' verse. I can get most of it, but there are a couple of words that still evade me. |
ok.computer 21.01.2007 23:00 |
Queen Archivist wrote: ok.computer... You are a first rate arsehole with no redeaming features or even a sense of humour. I pity you. I imagine you and and zebonka12 get on well together - you are both as dull and completely predictable as each other. You couldn't be impartial or [SNIP] etc etc into a rant probably written under the influence of gin, which as usual, demonstrates piss-poor sentence structure, endless whining, an avoidance of the original question which I posted almost two years ago, and a shotgun blast of diatribic shite which meanders on with about as much consistency as a Greg Books book.Predictable. A good word. Here's how it's a good word. 15 Jan 2007. "Greg" was asked when, when are you going to be finished. No sensible answer. 6 February 2006 - ditto 27 May 2006 - ditto 25 May 2006 - ditto several times throughout July - ditto December 2005 - ditto The list predictably goes on with predictably enough, no answers. Well what can I say? I'll keep it brief and mono-syllabic for the target audience. (That's you, by the way...anyone who spells "vain" as "vane" needs all the help they can get.) I certainly have no sense of humour when a grown man like you spends so much time in here when he should be working at getting those mythical box sets out to the punters. There's nothing original in what I post in response to you because I - like many others - have only one, very simple request... Where the fuck is the material you "say" you are working on? Now over to you to do something original - provide us with some answers. What is there in these archives? When will we see it? I have a feeling, that there is very little. How else are managing to spend so much time in here, when you should be wiping the sweat from your baldy little brow working hard to produce that which we have waited YEARS for...? The time lapse is utterly ridiculous. I'd love to see the project turnaround time for the Beatles' Anthologies...Dylan's Bootleg stuff...The Who's Maximum R'n'B (an excellent, highly recommended package), the Zepplin Remasters, etc. It's never going to match the years you have strung this out for. You can keep your pity - put your efforts into getting the work done. It's what you've been paid for. Mind you, if inserting the phrase "Property of Queen Productions" over everything and releasing error-tastic Queen Concert books is the height of it, I think we might have a long wait... |
john bodega 21.01.2007 23:35 |
"The Who's Maximum R'n'B (an excellent, highly recommended package)" DAMN RIGHT. |
Lester Burnham 21.01.2007 23:58 |
Zebonka12 wrote:As best as I can make it out...Dr. Perry Cox wrote:After such a love as this?? No way! Actually one of my favourite passtimes is trying to figure out what the hell Roger is singing during the 2nd 'lost' verse. I can get most of it, but there are a couple of words that still evade me.Zebonka12 wrote: I sure love bantering with you Greg, but this unadulterated fiction you seem to spit out like a sewer hole...I hope you don't still receive its kiss! "I used to deck out affection, Jump in with my cheap guitar I must've lost my direction, Cause I ended up a superstar One night in the ballroom, *something* by the human race, You can learn from my mistakes, But you're posing in the glass again (?) Well who are you" etc. |
john bodega 22.01.2007 05:20 |
DAMN haha, that's actually better than mine : "I used to check my reflection jumping with my pink guitar I must've fucked my direction 'cos I ended up a superstar. One night I was in the boardroom Petrified the human race You can learn from my mistakes but you're posing in the glass again". See, mine made no sense at all! Hahaha. |
Lester Burnham 22.01.2007 11:02 |
Zebonka12 wrote: DAMN haha, that's actually better than mine : "I used to check my reflection jumping with my pink guitar I must've fucked my direction 'cos I ended up a superstar. One night I was in the boardroom Petrified the human race You can learn from my mistakes but you're posing in the glass again". See, mine made no sense at all! Hahaha.Actually, the only part of yours that doesn't make sense is the pink guitar line; everything else actually sounds about right. "Boardroom" makes more sense than "ballroom", because the song was about Pete's disgust with a lengthy meeting where he received a million dollars for the publishing rights to some of his songs. Needless to say, I'll never get understand the sixth line -- Roger's voice is just too garbled for me to decipher. |
john bodega 22.01.2007 11:27 |
Hahaha, Well the posing in the glass thing sounds as close as anything else... I was going to perform the song at TAFE using the alternate verse actually. Just for a laugh! |
brENsKi 22.01.2007 12:04 |
"he's not the Queen Archivist.....he's a VERY naughty boy!" |
Greenfella 22.01.2007 15:01 |
OMG... Laughed my ass right off... |
Donna13 22.01.2007 18:01 |
from wikipedia "I used to check my reflection / Jumping with my cheap guitar / I must have lost my direction, cause I ended up a superstar / One night I was in the boardroom / Petrified, a human wreck / You can learn from my mistakes, but you're posing in the glass again". |
Lester Burnham 22.01.2007 18:14 |
Donna13 wrote: from wikipedia "I used to check my reflection / Jumping with my cheap guitar / I must have lost my direction, cause I ended up a superstar / One night I was in the boardroom / Petrified, a human wreck / You can learn from my mistakes, but you're posing in the glass again".BOOYAH, thank you wikipedia (and Donna)! |
Donna13 22.01.2007 18:34 |
Dr. Perry Cox wrote:Haha. I like "pink guitar" better.Donna13 wrote: from wikipedia "I used to check my reflection / Jumping with my cheap guitar / I must have lost my direction, cause I ended up a superstar / One night I was in the boardroom / Petrified, a human wreck / You can learn from my mistakes, but you're posing in the glass again".BOOYAH, thank you wikipedia (and Donna)! |
wii1will87 22.01.2007 19:40 |
blooody NORA there's some nasty banter going on in this thread. but seriously,...... when are the anthologys coming out? a friend of mine went to the queen fan club convention in wales and it was announced then that they would be or a part of them would be out for xmas 06. and yeah it does seem from past reading, whenever someone asks greg brooks a question they just get a silly, sarcastic or 'funny' answer. ------------------- Wii |
john bodega 23.01.2007 01:05 |
Hah, last time I checked Wikipedia it just told me the lost verse was indecipherable! |
ARCHIVIST?WTF! 23.01.2007 15:24 |
John S.Stuart has done quite an exemplary job for us so far in documenting what is available and i am sure if it was up to the majority of the fans we would prefer to see him doing the archiving.At least John will let us know and point out things to us. All we want to know from the band have told you is when we are likely to see any box sets, if at all. That's all. |
theCro 23.01.2007 16:56 |
greg, get some chicks, get some fucking life and get laid [if you can] and you'll feel much more better than posting here... for God's sake, you are Queen official person and you cant post topics like this, moron |
ARCHIVIST?WTF! 23.01.2007 18:09 |
The Cro,were you directing your reply at me? |
John S Stuart 24.01.2007 12:35 |
ARCHIVIST?WTF! wrote: John S.Stuart has done quite an exemplary job for us so far in documenting what is available and i am sure if it was up to the majority of the fans we would prefer to see him doing the archiving.At least John will let us know and point out things to us. All we want to know from the band have told you is when we are likely to see any box sets, if at all. That's all.ARCHIVIST?WTF!: Thank you for the positive feedback and your faith in my scribbling. It is always welcome when someone values a labour of love. Personally, I find such praise a great incentive to push boundaries even further, so hopefully, we may be able to use this as some sort of spring-board to launch into a 2007 campaign. |
Crezchi 25.01.2007 02:08 |
theCro wrote: greg, get some chicks, get some fucking life and get laid [if you can] and you'll feel much more better than posting here... for God's sake, you are Queen official person and you cant post topics like this, moronDo you really have the room to call someone a moron? lol. And Greg is NOT an Official Queen person as you call it. He is nothing more than a Statutory Employee, meaning contract worker. |
ARCHIVIST?WTF! 27.01.2007 15:53 |
Queen Official Person?What the fuck does this mean The Cro?Are we Queen Official Fans as well? Any morons where you come from? |
theCro 27.01.2007 16:00 |
ARCHIVIST?WTF! wrote: Queen Official Person?What the fuck does this mean The Cro?Are we Queen Official Fans as well? Any morons where you come from?if he works for Queen he is their officiall employee then... is he? or he is not? |
Crezchi 27.01.2007 17:02 |
theCro wrote:No he isn't, he is a sub-contracted statutory employee.ARCHIVIST?WTF! wrote: Queen Official Person?What the fuck does this mean The Cro?Are we Queen Official Fans as well? Any morons where you come from?if he works for Queen he is their officiall employee then... is he? or he is not? |