QueenZone discussion #884220

<font color=orange><b>Freddies son</b wrote: Fuck George Bush

<font color=orange><b>Freddies son</b wrote: Fuck George Bush

<b><font color="#FF1493">The Fairy King wrote:

<font color=orange><b>Freddies son</b wrote: Fuck George Bush

OMFG!!! YOUR PICTURE OMFG!!!!!! xD

Mr.Jingles wrote:

<font color=orange><b>Freddies son</b wrote: Fuck George Bush

...and Chavez too. Fuckin' Chavez is as much of a left wing extremist as Bush is from the political right wing. What strikes me as absolutely fuckin' hypocritical is the fact that Chavez calls Bush a demon, and yet he's been seen lately kissing Ahmadinejad ass when the Iranian president recently called for Israel to be "wiped off the map", and his country continues to be on the focus of human rights groups who constantly criticize the fact that women in Iran get stoned to death for showing a bare arm. Not to mention that poverty is on the raise in Venezuela despite false propaganda from Chavez to prove the opossite. Chavez has been spending millions and millions building up military structure with the excuse that the country needs to defend itself from a potential invasion from the United States. If Chavez cared so much about the poor, why not giving housing, food, and health care benefits to them instead of investing in warfare. If you don't believe me, ask Mari.

<font color=orange><b>Freddies son</b wrote: Fuck George Bush

Sherwood Forest wrote: how do u mak fun of Fox because its the only news that doesnt chose sides and if it seems like they do all of you people think its the wrong side.

Mr.Jingles wrote:

Sherwood Forest wrote: how do u mak fun of Fox because its the only news that doesnt chose sides and if it seems like they do all of you people think its the wrong side.

I get all my news from the Daily Show and the Colbert Report. ...FOX News is definitely not the only news network that gets picked on.

<b><font color=666600>Music Man wrote:

Mr.Jingles wrote:

Sherwood Forest wrote: how do u mak fun of Fox because its the only news that doesnt chose sides and if it seems like they do all of you people think its the wrong side.

I get all my news from the Daily Show and the Colbert Report. ...FOX News is definitely not the only news network that gets picked on.

I'm pretty sure that all major news networks get picked on all the time. Fox just seems to be conservative at times, whether it is or is not. However, it's not so much the networks that are biased as it is the people who represent it...and since EVERYONE is biased to some extent, you really have to expect that. But at least the Daily Show and Colbert Report don't try to hide the fact that they are massively liberal. I think all news networks should take after their example. Each one should pick a side and compete with other networks in that respect. And occasionally you could have some cross-network debates and such...it would be amazingly fun to watch. You could have a channel for the Democrats...one for the Republicans...hey, even give the Libertarians a channel.

<b><font color=666600>Music Man wrote:

Mr.Jingles wrote:

Sherwood Forest wrote: how do u mak fun of Fox because its the only news that doesnt chose sides and if it seems like they do all of you people think its the wrong side.

I get all my news from the Daily Show and the Colbert Report. ...FOX News is definitely not the only news network that gets picked on.

I'm pretty sure that all major news networks get picked on all the time. Fox just seems to be conservative at times, whether it is or is not. However, it's not so much the networks that are biased as it is the people who represent it...and since EVERYONE is biased to some extent, you really have to expect that. But at least the Daily Show and Colbert Report don't try to hide the fact that they are massively liberal. I think all news networks should take after their example. Each one should pick a side and compete with other networks in that respect. And occasionally you could have some cross-network debates and such...it would be amazingly fun to watch. You could have a channel for the Democrats...one for the Republicans...hey, even give the Libertarians a channel.

<b><font color=666600>Music Man wrote:

Mr.Jingles wrote:

Sherwood Forest wrote: how do u mak fun of Fox because its the only news that doesnt chose sides and if it seems like they do all of you people think its the wrong side.

I get all my news from the Daily Show and the Colbert Report. ...FOX News is definitely not the only news network that gets picked on.

I'm pretty sure that all major news networks get picked on all the time. Fox just seems to be conservative at times, whether it is or is not. However, it's not so much the networks that are biased as it is the people who represent it...and since EVERYONE is biased to some extent, you really have to expect that. But at least the Daily Show and Colbert Report don't try to hide the fact that they are massively liberal. I think all news networks should take after their example. Each one should pick a side and compete with other networks in that respect. And occasionally you could have some cross-network debates and such...it would be amazingly fun to watch. You could have a channel for the Democrats...one for the Republicans...hey, even give the Libertarians a channel.

<b><font color="#FF1493">The Fairy King wrote: Bush is responsible for 9/11.

<font color=pink>Sophie wrote:

<b><font color="#FF1493">The Fairy King wrote: Bush is responsible for 9/11.

Haystacks Calhounski wrote: Plus, anyone who derives their political views from Rolling Stone, Colbert, Michael Moore are simply dim anyway.

Haystacks Calhounski wrote:

<font color=pink>Sophie wrote:

<b><font color="#FF1493">The Fairy King wrote: Bush is responsible for 9/11.

One of the more idiotic conspiracy theories that I have ever seen.... Funny that it comes from the same people saying that he has completely bungled the War on Terror. Let's be brutally honest. How can you, as a group, one one hand, complain that in 4 + years the man can't seem to do anything right, has screwed up Iraq, etc, and on the other hand, say that, in 8 months time, he put together a perfectly executed plot to destroy the Twin Towers???? Laughable.

Mr.Jingles wrote:

Haystacks Calhounski wrote:

<font color=pink>Sophie wrote:

<b><font color="#FF1493">The Fairy King wrote: Bush is responsible for 9/11.

One of the more idiotic conspiracy theories that I have ever seen.... Funny that it comes from the same people saying that he has completely bungled the War on Terror. Let's be brutally honest. How can you, as a group, one one hand, complain that in 4 + years the man can't seem to do anything right, has screwed up Iraq, etc, and on the other hand, say that, in 8 months time, he put together a perfectly executed plot to destroy the Twin Towers???? Laughable.

It's on record that the White House ignored warnings of a possible attack involving hijacked planes. During the investigation by the 9/11 Comission, members of the Bush Administration declined to testify on record and in separate. What's the actual truth? I guess we might never know, but there sure is a lot of doubts about whether if our president "cares" about Americans. For once, Katrina proved that he did not give a shit about the poor.

<font color=gold>SMI<font color=1>TTY™ wrote: Come on people. Honestly, every single week there is some random Bush-bash on this forum, and it's really annoying!! You don't see me almost constantly bashing political figures (whether they deserve it or not), now why should you!? JUST FUCKIN' SHUT UP ALREADY!!! P.S. Freddies son, you are a dick.

ihavenolegs wrote: Geroge W Bush

Mircrowave! wrote: then he, Joe Pesci, and Chavez should go make GONE FISHIN' 2.

ihavenolegs wrote: Geroge W Bush

Ah, an anti-Bush retard. We spell it George as most George's do.

Marial-B wrote: I remember when I posted the fraud about the elections of 2004 and I got bashed... Thank God now everyone in the world sees that.

ihavenolegs wrote: Bush and Kerry are related, it wouldn't have made a difference who's in office. Bush by no means a dictator. To tell you the truth, it really doesn't matter who's in office anyway, Special Interest and Big Business run Washington DC.

Mircrowave! wrote:

Marial-B wrote: I remember when I posted the fraud about the elections of 2004 and I got bashed... Thank God now everyone in the world sees that.

There was no fraud on the election of 2004. Bush simply had more electoral votes than Kerry. The US doesn't base their election process on the popular vote. That doesn't work and would encourage voter fraud.

Mircrowave! wrote:

Marial-B wrote: I remember when I posted the fraud about the elections of 2004 and I got bashed... Thank God now everyone in the world sees that.

There was no fraud on the election of 2004. Bush simply had more electoral votes than Kerry. The US doesn't base their election process on the popular vote. That doesn't work and would encourage voter fraud. Heck, the Mexicans still can't figure out who their President is!!!

Marial-B wrote: BTW... Danny Glover is friendly with Chavez, he came here once for a meeting with the loonatic from Miraflores.

<b><font color=666600>Music Man wrote:

Marial-B wrote: BTW... Danny Glover is friendly with Chavez, he came here once for a meeting with the loonatic from Miraflores.

The guy from Angels in the Outfield?

ihavenolegs wrote: link MEXICO CITY Sep 5, 2006 (AP)— Felipe Calderon became president-elect of Mexico on Tuesday, two months after disputed elections, when the nation's top electoral court voted unanimously to reject allegations of fraud and certify his narrow victory.

Haystacks Calhounski wrote: Glover is out there.....

Mr.Jingles wrote:

<b><font color=666600>Music Man wrote:

Mr.Jingles wrote:

Sherwood Forest wrote: how do u mak fun of Fox because its the only news that doesnt chose sides and if it seems like they do all of you people think its the wrong side.

I get all my news from the Daily Show and the Colbert Report. ...FOX News is definitely not the only news network that gets picked on.

I'm pretty sure that all major news networks get picked on all the time. Fox just seems to be conservative at times, whether it is or is not. However, it's not so much the networks that are biased as it is the people who represent it...and since EVERYONE is biased to some extent, you really have to expect that. But at least the Daily Show and Colbert Report don't try to hide the fact that they are massively liberal. I think all news networks should take after their example. Each one should pick a side and compete with other networks in that respect. And occasionally you could have some cross-network debates and such...it would be amazingly fun to watch. You could have a channel for the Democrats...one for the Republicans...hey, even give the Libertarians a channel.

Why is it that disageeing with the Bush administration instantly labels us a radical liberals? The majority of people who disagree with the policies of our government happen to be moderate (both liberal and conservative), but either way we get placed on the other extreme side of the political spectrum along with Michael Moore and Rage Against The Machine. Sure most comedians happen to be liberal, moderates, non-partisan, or libertarian. While there's no doubt that they seem to have more sympathy for Clinton than Bush, did they distance themselves from making Clinton jokes during the Monica Lewinsky scandal?

Mircrowave! wrote: So are you for or against Kinky Friedman? PS You can't complain if you have nothing to stand on, Ihavenolegs.

Mircrowave! wrote: So are you for or against Kinky Friedman? I kinda liked him, but of course there's everybody claiming he's a racist now. And that "good shepherd" crap... ah jeez. PS You can't complain if you have nothing to stand on, Ihavenolegs.

Haystacks Calhounski wrote:

ihavenolegs wrote: Bush and Kerry are related, it wouldn't have made a difference who's in office. Bush by no means a dictator. To tell you the truth, it really doesn't matter who's in office anyway, Special Interest and Big Business run Washington DC.

Bingo.

ihavenolegs wrote: OH! Try to listen to Walton and Johnson on 93.3 The Bone. It takes some time to get used to them, but they're freaking hilarious!

Mircrowave! wrote: Cool. I'm in Petty Theft, on keys. We're on TexasGigs.com as well as our own site. We ALL play Rics EXCEPT our bassist!!! Funny, huh? He prefers an Alembic or a custom Mike Lull.

ihavenolegs wrote: Washington is in dire need of change, but I don't see that happening. Let me ask you guys a question. If you were a politician and the ACME Corporation offered you $1 Million dollars to vote yes or no on a certain proposition, what would you do? Most politicians get into politics for the right reasons, but in the end they end up corrupt just like the rest of Washington.

ihavenolegs wrote: Are you guys aware there's two more Tom Petty tribute band with the same name?

ihavenolegs wrote:

Mircrowave! wrote:

Marial-B wrote: I remember when I posted the fraud about the elections of 2004 and I got bashed... Thank God now everyone in the world sees that.

There was no fraud on the election of 2004. Bush simply had more electoral votes than Kerry. The US doesn't base their election process on the popular vote. That doesn't work and would encourage voter fraud. Heck, the Mexicans still can't figure out who their President is!!!

Not true, you should read the paper more often. It was decided a couple of weeks ago.

young_strat_man wrote:

<b><font color="#FF1493">The Fairy King wrote: Bush is a twat. Bush is a clone of his dad. Bush is a Nazi. Bush is a homophobe. Bush is the devil. Bush will go to hell. Bush is responsible for 9/11. Bush will cause a new world war. Bush isn't anti terrorism, but pro oil. Bush has a huge bush. Chavez isn''t any better.

Your name must be Bush you faggot fuckhead! Why don't you go back to your FAILING attempt of a Queen site!?

young_strat_man wrote: Ok anti-Bush ppl and Bush ppl, listen up! WE HAVE NEVER HAD A PRESIDENT WHO DID A 100% GREAT JOB AND SATISFIED EVEN HALF OF THE POPULATION! WE WILL NEVER HAVE A PRESIDENT WHO DOES THAT! GET OVER IT OR MOVE! I DON'T LIKE BUSH AT ALL, BUT HE IS NOT TO BLAME FOR EVERYTHING! US AMERICANS ARE TO BLAME FOR HALF OF THE SHIT LIKE WELFARE AND THE ECONOMY. AND THE OTHER HALF NEEDS TO BE BLAMED ON THE HOUSE AND THE SENATE, YOU KNOW THEY MAKE THE FINAL DESICIONS, NOT BUSH, WELL AT LEAST BUSH CANNOT MAKE THE RULES LIKE IN A DICTATORSHIP, SO SHUT UP ABOUT BUSH BEING A DICTATOR, YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT A DICTATORSHIP IS OBVIOUSLY.

Zeni wrote:

young_strat_man wrote: Ok anti-Bush ppl and Bush ppl, listen up! WE HAVE NEVER HAD A PRESIDENT WHO DID A 100% GREAT JOB AND SATISFIED EVEN HALF OF THE POPULATION! WE WILL NEVER HAVE A PRESIDENT WHO DOES THAT! GET OVER IT OR MOVE! I DON'T LIKE BUSH AT ALL, BUT HE IS NOT TO BLAME FOR EVERYTHING! US AMERICANS ARE TO BLAME FOR HALF OF THE SHIT LIKE WELFARE AND THE ECONOMY. AND THE OTHER HALF NEEDS TO BE BLAMED ON THE HOUSE AND THE SENATE, YOU KNOW THEY MAKE THE FINAL DESICIONS, NOT BUSH, WELL AT LEAST BUSH CANNOT MAKE THE RULES LIKE IN A DICTATORSHIP, SO SHUT UP ABOUT BUSH BEING A DICTATOR, YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT A DICTATORSHIP IS OBVIOUSLY.

I see that Harvard Law degree has done you well.

ibanez122 wrote: Atleast he speaks the truth.

Zeni wrote:

ibanez122 wrote: Atleast he speaks the truth.

Bollocks Can't be bothered to read the rest of his gibberish, but that post I quoted had at least 3 freaky opinions which you consider facts. Maybe the capital letters distracted you? Still, Harvard surely would have trained a better law student.

young_strat_man wrote: Honestly, i think you were distracted by your opinion and a lack of knowledge of politics and the history of the US. And what 3 freaky opinions are you ranting about?

Haystacks Calhounski wrote:

Mr.Jingles wrote:

Haystacks Calhounski wrote:

<font color=pink>Sophie wrote:

<b><font color="#FF1493">The Fairy King wrote: Bush is responsible for 9/11.

One of the more idiotic conspiracy theories that I have ever seen.... Funny that it comes from the same people saying that he has completely bungled the War on Terror. Let's be brutally honest. How can you, as a group, one one hand, complain that in 4 + years the man can't seem to do anything right, has screwed up Iraq, etc, and on the other hand, say that, in 8 months time, he put together a perfectly executed plot to destroy the Twin Towers???? Laughable.

It's on record that the White House ignored warnings of a possible attack involving hijacked planes. During the investigation by the 9/11 Comission, members of the Bush Administration declined to testify on record and in separate. What's the actual truth? I guess we might never know, but there sure is a lot of doubts about whether if our president "cares" about Americans. For once, Katrina proved that he did not give a shit about the poor.

I am talking about the idiots out there who are somehow convinced that Bush is behind the 9/11 attacks. Clinton bears far more responsibility for the attacks than does Bush. The National Security was very, very screwed up, and even though changes have been made, the system is still broken. Much better than it was, but still broken. Regarding Katrina (you are sure spouting the Democratic talking points pretty good here!!), how many possible ways did the Local government, as well as the State, tell those people to GET OUT OF TOWN? It is not George Bush's fault that residents didn't listen. Mistakes were made, by not only the residents, but by Federal, State, and Local governments as well. My guess is, next time, they will. The bottom line with Katrina is, people knew it was coming, people knew what damage could potentially occur if it actually hit New Orleans, and tens of thousands did not leave. No one hears anymore, though, about the other hundreds of thousands of people in Missisippi, where the damage was far and away WORSE than New Orleans. Why? Because people there had enough sense to leave.

young_strat_man wrote:

<b><font color="#FF1493">The Fairy King wrote: Bush is a twat. Bush is a clone of his dad. Bush is a Nazi. Bush is a homophobe. Bush is the devil. Bush will go to hell. Bush is responsible for 9/11. Bush will cause a new world war. Bush isn't anti terrorism, but pro oil. Bush has a huge bush. Chavez isn''t any better.

Your name must be Bush you faggot fuckhead! Why don't you go back to your FAILING attempt of a Queen site!?

young_strat_man wrote:

Marial-B wrote: You're being rude to my friend... I have the right to say whatever I want to you, so quit it

And i have the right to say whatever i want when your friend talks shit to me and about a country to where he doesn't even live. And no i won't quit, when ppl talk about the USA it pisses me off because 90% of them Do NOT live here, and 90% of those go by what the media says. Like i said, this is nothing personal to you, it's to your friend, if he is your friend, quit embarrassing him by having to have a woman stick up for him! Let him defend his own actions.

young_strat_man wrote: What i said was FACT, there has NEVER been a president in our history with a 'CITIZENS' approval more than 50%, read the the damn books.

young_strat_man wrote: 3 - And perhaps you can explain how the public is responsible for welfare? That's a new one to me. Never saw a welfare referendum on any ballot I voted on. @ Zeni, It is the people's fault because there is WAY too many lazy ass fuckers in the USA who don't want to work! You can see these Government aided people getting into their Brand new cars going to the food pantry and wearing a fucking rolex? hmmm, but you are right and i wrong. I don't know where in the USA you live but obviously you need to open up your eyes. And another thing about Welfare and other assistance, the government won't cut these abusers off, that the problem, while i pay almost 50% of my earnings in taxes, these ppl have illegal jobs of dealing drugs, and this is while they are getting their rent, untilities, and everything else paid for while the husband goes out and deals drugs in his brand new car, while the woman sits on her ass at home with 6 fucking kids and collects. That is what i am talking about.

Zeni wrote:

young_strat_man wrote: What i said was FACT, there has NEVER been a president in our history with a 'CITIZENS' approval more than 50%, read the the damn books.

link link link link link If by "FACT," you meant "steaming pile of horseshit," then yes, you are correct. Those links clearly show several presidents with high approval ratings well over 50%, including Clinton, Reagan, and the first Bush. But continue to think I know nothing about American history. It only makes you look like a fool.