| Freddie's #1 Fan Forever 28.06.2006 19:30 |
I am wondering about what Queen fans think about Michael Jackson. At one particular convention, I heard people booing when a picture of Michael Jackson was shown during a video. I wonder whether this is the way that other Queen fans feel. On the other hand, I really like Michael Jackson a lot. Like Freddie, I think that he is/was one of the few really great entertainers from the past few decades. |
| deadbird 28.06.2006 21:40 |
I LOVE MJ!!!!!!!! He's mine. Hes os cute and guess what I can dane thriller how HOT am I? |
| FreddiesGhettoTrench 28.06.2006 21:42 |
.....I never got it. I never really got into his music, and on a personal level he just freaks me out. |
| deadbird 28.06.2006 21:43 |
you freak him out. |
| its_a_hard_life 26994 28.06.2006 21:46 |
deadbird wrote: you freak him out.LMAO.... |
| FreddiesGhettoTrench 28.06.2006 21:46 |
deadbird wrote: you freak him out.But I haven't bleached myself :) |
| user name 28.06.2006 21:49 |
Talentless hack who only had the ablity to participate in entertaining choreography. His only good song was listenable due to the inclusion of Eddie Van Halen. And the only good parts of that song were the parts which involved Eddie Van Halen. Basically, he was the prelude to everything that was wrong with pop music in the 90's. Now, he's simply a grotesque lunatic, and it's nice to see that other people recognize that this man really doesn't belong anywhere. |
| ilvcats 28.06.2006 21:57 |
Here here! |
| deadbird 28.06.2006 22:00 |
Yeah, the THRILLER album, only the single hugest and most influential musical movement since the beatles. what a talentless hack. Who are you? youre nobody. |
| The prophet's song 29.06.2006 00:30 |
I prefer to listen to him with my eyes closed. He's a great musician, but now he just looks creepy. I tried to do the thriller dance the other day, didn't work at all...ha ha |
| Owlbee 29.06.2006 00:32 |
I THINK THAT IS HE IS A FREAK! AND WILL ALWAYS BE!! HE MOVED OUT OF AMERICA RECENTLY AND ALLL I CAN SAY IS "GOOD-BYE"!!! |
| bohemian_killer_queen 29.06.2006 04:38 |
Michael Jackson is awsome and quite frankly i dont give a fuck what anyone thinks but to me he is one of the greatest artists of all time and to all you people who think he is talentless look at the comparison of the amount of albums he has sold to your own. Michael Jackon ROCKS!! But not as much as Queen ofcourse. |
| deleted user 29.06.2006 05:22 |
To call MJ a talentless hack is like saying Freddie Mercury couldn't sing. It is a ridiculous statement. You do not have to love what he does, ofcourse, in fact I can see how the kids of today must have a hard time looking past his messed up face. Also his moves have stagnated. He used to blend the freshest with the oldest and come up with new ways of dancing. Nowadays he is like a robot. The life of Michael Jackson is a really sad one. He has created a cage for himself. Who is going to help him? His crazy family? But musically I love OFF THE WALL. On this album he was on his own for the first time and still on his way to become the greatest in pop. This is more disco and similar to his preceding recordings with his brothers. Quincy Jones produced. Ofcourse THRILLER is a favorite too. The album that made him the king of pop. The vocalperformances are great, the songs are sharp and Quincy's production is brilliant. At this time Michael took musicvideos to another level with his videos for Billie Jean, Beat it and especially Thriller. BAD was the creation of a popchampion trying to maintain his title, but for me this is where I started to loose interest. Sure, he produced hits but his image was no longer in touch with the outside world. He started loosing ground... |
| val 29467 29.06.2006 05:24 |
I think he's shit, he has a few good songs but the rest...? |
| deleted user 29.06.2006 05:36 |
Weh, I think he is alright, I dont really like him, but his music is pretty cool, the only thing I don't like is when my cousin dressed up like him he looked like Freddie :( Fred is too cool for that in my opinion. |
| FreMe 29.06.2006 06:00 |
I have his Bad lp, but I´m not into his music.. I keep it because I like the cover, and because I hope that it will get valuable some day :s |
| deleted user 29.06.2006 06:07 |
I like the songs but I don't like the way he seems to hiccup or something after singing one word #You start to scre-eaeam 'ooh gasp'# |
| deleted user 29.06.2006 06:30 |
The prophet's song wrote: I prefer to listen to him with my eyes closed. He's a great musician, but now he just looks creepy. I tried to do the thriller dance the other day, didn't work at all...ha haJudgeing somebody because off they way they look how very sad |
| Poo, again 29.06.2006 07:49 |
I think he's a creepy white female in her mid 40's. |
| deleted user 29.06.2006 08:22 |
Owlbee wrote: I THINK THAT IS HE IS A FREAK! AND WILL ALWAYS BE!! HE MOVED OUT OF AMERICA RECENTLY AND ALLL I CAN SAY IS "GOOD-BYE"!!!Yeah to get away from Freaks like you and to move to a better country that isnt controled by the Media and is actualy run properly |
| rachael mae. 29.06.2006 09:33 |
I like a few of his songs, and he's a good musician I guess, but I think he's a bit weird. I think he's obviously got problems, I just hope he gets them sorted out. |
| Koeni 29.06.2006 09:49 |
Music Man wrote: Talentless hackSales records: Michael Jackson is one of the best-selling male pop artist of all-time, with over 350 million albums and singles sold worldwide. Thriller is the best-selling album of all-time, with over 51 million copies sold worldwide [1]. HIStory: Past, Present, & Future is the best-selling multiple-disc album of all-time, with 18 million copies sold worldwide etc. etc...... link |
| Koeni 29.06.2006 10:01 |
That says nothing about talent, more about the promotion for an album and how many vicitms you can score with it to buy a cd/lp/ep whateverIf these were numbers of Queen chart records you wouldnt say that! Narrow minded... |
| deleted user 29.06.2006 10:15 |
Koeni wrote:ExactlyThat says nothing about talent, more about the promotion for an album and how many vicitms you can score with it to buy a cd/lp/ep whateverIf these were numbers of Queen chart records you wouldnt say that! Narrow minded... |
| Koeni 29.06.2006 10:50 |
I think you are the narrow minded person to attack a person without reading it from a different perspective than the "DIE HARD Queenfan"Ouch! Calm down! I never attacked you as a person, I only responded to your short statement (there was no perspective) which in my opinion is narrow minded. I never said that Thriller is the best single ever! I only said that Thriller is the best-selling album of all-time according to Wikipedia. |
| deleted user 29.06.2006 10:51 |
is dad probably messed him up, liked his old stuff from the early 90's and earlier. |
| skiqueen 29.06.2006 11:07 |
he has some good songs, but im not really into him |
| deleted user 29.06.2006 11:45 |
his earlier stuff is amazing...but thats it.. |
| When_The_Doves_Cry 29.06.2006 12:31 |
i think he's a f***ing sexual maniac |
| deleted user 29.06.2006 12:39 |
he can sing, thats for sure.. |
| Poo, again 29.06.2006 13:11 |
<font color=pink>The Millionaire Waltz wrote: I think he's a creepy white female in her mid 40's.Oh my God, doesn't anyone agree? How can you not see that he is in fact a white female! |
| Mr Phoenix 29.06.2006 13:19 |
Michael is a great dancer, yeah he's an artist but he's a singer for the children... |
| Poo, again 29.06.2006 13:23 |
Michael Jackson - Lover of children everywhere. |
| Carol! the Musical 29.06.2006 13:39 |
<font color=pink>The Millionaire Waltz wrote:I agree.. I actually mistaked him for that when I saw him in a magazine! :S I was 9, lol..<font color=pink>The Millionaire Waltz wrote: I think he's a creepy white female in her mid 40's.Oh my God, doesn't anyone agree? How can you not see that he is in fact a white female! |
| Suigi 29.06.2006 13:44 |
The man? Creepy. The music? What he crafted ranges from dreck to incredible. My personal favourites are Black & White (which IMHO coulda been done better by Freddie) and Thriller (VINCENT PRICE!). |
| Winter Land Man 29.06.2006 14:57 |
deadbird wrote: Yeah, the THRILLER album, only the single hugest and most influential musical movement since the beatles. what a talentless hack. Who are you? youre nobody.Influential? |
| gimmetheprize 29.06.2006 15:17 |
He only seems normal when you see him performing live, will this ever happen again, I dont really care, apart from that the guy is pretty unstable, no matter what you may think |
| deadbird 29.06.2006 15:19 |
To all the people who find him talentless- I can understand why you don't like him, he's out there and many think he molests children, but....because you don't like someone, that does not mean that every aspect about them is bad. that doesn't mean he has no talent. i doubt youve listened to very much of him. what you guys need to do is do a little "history of music" lesson to learn about the VAST influence and talent of the "king of pop", as he has been dubbed. you DONT HAVE TO AGREE WITH HIS LIFE TO ADMIT HE HAS TALENT. DONT BE RETARDED. so- in his time, he was the single most POPULAR artist and he pioneered and cleared the way for SOOO many types of music that we are just used to today. the Thriller album was the biggest musical phenomenon since the beatles- simply the numbers say that- and to say that that means "nothing" about his talent...im sorry, thats just dumb. that doesnt happen- many people without talent DONT become that extremely popular and unique. im not here to say anything about his life other than the musical aspect- thats a WHOLE nother spiel. maybe you dont like him..ok that is fine. maybe you dont like his music...ok thats perfectly ok too, but if you DONT KNOW ABOUT HIS MUSICAL INFLUENCE OR HIS SHEER POPULARITY (ETC ECT), YOU CANT CALL HIM TALENTLESS. its not hard- just dont say anything! who says you have to have an opinion on everything? (especially things you dont KNOW about) so GET some perspective and dont be retarded. db (phew) |
| Ready_Coddie 29.06.2006 15:32 |
I pity the poor man... he is too innocent... Everyone takes advantage of him... He cant be strong and selfish for his own sake. He tries to revive a childhood he never had and misses out on adulthood... life is sad indeed |
| Kelsieluvsducks 29.06.2006 15:38 |
He's a good musician(spelling?), but I would rather listen to other stuff. |
| unknown 29.06.2006 15:53 |
Personally, I consider him as a talented musician who sadly became a victim of fame... |
| breakthru1989 29.06.2006 16:43 |
the man is a great talent in music,video,dance, live shows. his best album is THRILLER,1982 HIS worst is invincible,2001 everithing is wrong and don’t fit. i think it’s because of the idiots from the media who twist everything around and blow the stories up. i don’t believe the media. maybe jackson is bit weird who cares. that don’t makes him an SMOOTH CRIMINAL. there are a lot of wierdos in the world do you hear of them,NO. i think that THRILLER gave him everything. he went to the top. get’s all the fame in the world,adored,hits,money,awards,best selling album in the world. sold out shows,influenced by queen’s HOT SPACE 1982. then came the DOWNFALL. he can’t take it anymore everything is to much. 1984 he gets an accident and gets face surgury. his childhood takes a big part in his life. some people get’s yealous makes bad storys in the press. jackson becomes a bit strange. new album with jacksons victory,1984. his brothers become jealous of his fame too. 1985 end of the jacksons with michael. now he is a prisoner in his own home. (because of THRILLER) 1987 releasing of BAD an waeker album. strange stories getting stronger. shows getting bigger, 1991 the release of DANGEROUS stronger than bad. the big first lie in 1993 of accusing of.... 2001 invincible is ecually wrong as queen did in 1982 with hot space. these 2 albums have the same effect on me. it dussent sound good and get used too it. my top 3 is as follows. 1>>BEAT IT,1983 2>>MUSIC AND ME,1973 3>>ONE DAY IN YOUR LIFE,1975 |
| deleted user 29.06.2006 17:36 |
To all you Queen fans who belive everything in the Media GO FUCK YOURSELF |
| deleted user 29.06.2006 17:53 |
the_hero wrote: Does he still owns the Beatles tracks' rights?Yes |
| freddielives 25469 29.06.2006 19:29 |
purely based on what he did to Paul McCartney, it's easy for me to dislike him. he has a good voice, but thats about it. he's freakish and disloyal, and i have no respect for anyone who has those qualities. i really find it hard to believe Freddie Mercury would have anything to do with him now. |
| Mr.Jingles 29.06.2006 20:45 |
<b><font color=666600>Music Man wrote: Talentless hack who only had the ablity to participate in entertaining choreography. His only good song was listenable due to the inclusion of Eddie Van Halen. And the only good parts of that song were the parts which involved Eddie Van Halen. Basically, he was the prelude to everything that was wrong with pop music in the 90's.Sorry man, but that statement is just by far one of the most ignorant things I've heard on this board. Michael Jackson wrote many of his own songs (not all of them), and there's absolutely no denial that he was the biggest musical phenomenon to come after The Beatles. Sadly, his career has pretty much gone nowhere now that he's making more headlines based on controversy and not musical achievements. <b><font color=666600>Music Man wrote: Now, he's simply a grotesque lunatic, and it's nice to see that other people recognize that this man really doesn't belong anywhere.I do agree with this to some extent... but you really sound like a complete moron by saying that it's "nice to see" the perception that people have of Michael Jackson nowdays. I sort of pity Michael because he grew up being abused by his own father, and there's no doubt that he had his own childhood stolen away from him. However, the things Michael does are not normal. As much as Michael thinks he's a sane human being, it's obvious that he is not. He really needs a lot of therapy. Last thing I should mention is that it doesn't surprise me to hear such things coming from you after you were the same person who compared Nirvana to New Kids On The Block. |
| AmeriQueen 29.06.2006 21:11 |
What does anyone thing about the guy? He's a weirdo if anyone on Earth is, but he's an A list musician, A list singer and A+++ dancer. I don't like that he was said to have flipped out during his recording sessions with Queen/Freddie when he walked in on Freddie snorting away some booger sugar. I also don't like that he led them towards releasing Another One Bites The Dust. On one hand, it was their best selling single of all time and the biggest hit in America that year, doing more than anything else in raising Queen's popularity in the USA. That being said, this popularity encouraged Queen to explore a dance/R & B sound which led to some great music, but pulled them away from rock a bit, veering Queen off it's original path for a while. I think MJ's hits are strong and numerous, best of all they seem to be songs that still aound pretty good today in spite of their being WAY too overplayed. |
| Freddie's #1 Fan Forever 29.06.2006 21:12 |
Don't you at least have to admit that Michael Jackson is quite talented? I mean, he is a great dancer and well as a singer and songwriter. His style is also very original, even if he is very weird. |
| The prophet's song 30.06.2006 01:41 |
Freddies son wrote:I'm not judging him, I just think he went to the plastic surgeons a few more times than he should. Anyway, I'm against plastic surgery unless it's for people who have been in an accident and have serious burns or if it is for any other medical reasons. If you get it just because you want to look better, you need to listen to Johnny Depp "gravity will get us all in the end".The prophet's song wrote: I prefer to listen to him with my eyes closed. He's a great musician, but now he just looks creepy. I tried to do the thriller dance the other day, didn't work at all...ha haJudgeing somebody because off they way they look how very sad |
| Chris L ♣ 01.07.2006 02:10 |
Talented but he freaks me out!!! |
| Mr.Jingles 02.07.2006 06:53 |
Johnny Depp is the last man in this planet in the need for plastic surgery. Michael Jackson on the other hand was a good looking and charming dude back in his 'Off The Wall' days. All those plastic surgeries were absolutely unnecessary. He obviously has an obsesseion with his appearance, and all those surgeries ended up fucking up his entire face. |
| RETROLOVE 02.07.2006 18:34 |
daria k. wrote: Personally, I consider him as a talented musician who sadly became a victim of fame...So very true!!!! You hit it right on the mark.... I'm african-american, and Micheal was once one of the people who was really looked UP TO in the afro-american community...all of my cousins, aunts, uncles, parents always talk about him, and I personally know a lady who used to live next door to him, a cousin of his!!! I have all of his albums at home. I loved the old-soulful micheal (the jackson 5, off the wall), before he went POP, and his skin got light...lol. The mere fact that Freddie and Micheal used to be buddies almost brings tears to my eyes (2 of my favorite singers were friends!!!)...but keep in mind that with Queen, it seems like ALL OF THE MEMBERS OVERALL had a normal childhoods, THEY ALL WENT TO SCHOOL, COLLEGE, ETC...and music was actually something that they wanted to do, but Mike didnt get to do those things, so I really think he 'missed out' and he has some serious issues over that. (from what I read and see, I dont know the man personally). He also grew up being a Jehovah's Witness (so did I) and he celebrated no birthdays, no christmas, etc...so, overall what I'm trying to say, is that I think Micheal was and is the victim of his own situation....sad As for the child abuse, I dont know. People start doing weird things when they have money, but no one knows what happened except for god and him. |
| RETROLOVE 02.07.2006 18:36 |
the_hero wrote: Does he still owns the Beatles tracks' rights?Yep. Micheal pulled a quick one on Paul. I think he's gonna end up selling it back to him...lol QUESTION FOR EVERYONE: WHY DID FREDDIE AND MIKE STOP BEING FRIENDS? WAS IT BECAUSE OF THE BEATLES THING?? |
| user name 04.07.2006 16:21 |
Sorry for my late response. I had been out for the weekend after I had posted that, and the thread had been lost to the past, but I deemed it necessary to provide a rebuttal. Obviously Michael Jackson has talent. He can dance and choreograph well, he can sing to some extent, he can market well, perhaps he's even an expert knitter...to be honest, I don't care. When it comes to his music, there is literally nothing that appeals to me, much like Christina Aguilera and Britney Spears, or even 50 Cent, do not appeal to many of you. It is also quite ignorant to call these people talentless, however, to explain, "talentless" is an adjective commonly used in the music community to say, "I fucking hate so-and-so." There are so many things in the world that take incredible amounts of talent, however, most of them mean nothing to me (including anything Michael Jackson has EVER done), and therefore, I couldn't care less. Think of all the world records in the Guinness Book. They all require massive amounts of "talent." However, for most of them, nobody cares. I feel even sorrier for the world records that do not even get to grace the pages of that book. === Then you talk about his influence. Michael Jackson indeed sparked an enormous movement in pop music. He was a pioneer of the "Artist who sings to a choreographed dance, who is spotlighted, with little or no emphasis on music and instruments, but rather a strong emphasis on skilled vocals." This movement was especially strong throughout and around the 90's, and produced such bands as the New Kids on the Block, the Backstreet Boys, NSYNC, 98 Degrees, all those artists' respective solo careers, Britney Spears, Christina Aguilera, and other artists of the like. Perhaps you people enjoy such a genre, but I do not. Certainly I respect it, but not so much that I cannot heavily slag on it. === Finally, you talk about his monstrous record sales. All the previous artists I mentioned also received incredible record sales. This clearly means so much... Shrek 2 was one of the highest grossing movies of all time. That must automatically put it far above certain movies as Citizen Kane, Casablanca, or Gone With The Wind. Surely, Finding Nemo is many times greater than Schindler's List or The Godfather. Even in literature, it is obvious that sales define greatness. In fact, it is clear that none of the classics even come close to matching J.K. Rowling's Harry Potter series, clearly a literary masterpiece. So if in all these, then why not in music? I mean, Queen had very moderate record sales, but since they were only an okay band, this makes perfect sense. However, Britney Spears' ...Baby One More Time and Oops!...I Did It Again, the Backstreet Boys' self-titled album and Millenium, Boyz II Men's II, Jewel's Pieces of You, NSYNC's self-titled album, Hammer's Please Hammer Don't Hurt 'Em, The Lion King's soundtrack, and Linkin Park's Hybrid Theory all represent some of the greatest albums to ever grace the music industry, each with sales of over 10 million dollars! The above artists who put out multiple $10+ million albums are the best of the best, and will forever claim a pedestal in music history. === Come on, to say that what I said was offensive, or that you disagreed with it, is fine. But to say it was one of the most ignorant things you have ever heard is either incredibly forgetful, or incredibly ignorant in itself. The second part of my initial post was obviously a tongue-in-cheek cheap shot against Michael - it is incredibly obvious that I couldn't care less what he currently looks like, or what he's been up to. It is only his detrimental legacy that I highly criticize. |
| rocks. 04.07.2006 16:26 |
Hahahaha, fun topic. I personally think he is a great muscician (with the acception of his slow balads, ICK!) and the fact that he is peronally so damn CREAPY just bums me out. |
| deadbird 04.07.2006 22:46 |
to MusicMan: That was a very nice "rebuttal", there, as you called it, but after reading the whole thing over I kind of thought to myself, "hm, this guy kind of basically said 'ok, so yeah he has talent... but some popular things get big and dont have talent... and it's my opinion that I dont like M.Jackson" alright. thats great that thats your opinion. NO one has a problem with your opinion. Thing is this. I dunno what "music community" youre referring to... but gengerally, in the um... world, the word "talentless" is used to describe... a lack of talent: and what we were saying was, "woah, wait a second. Thats a riduculous statement to make about Michael Jackson." So, thanks, I guess, for clearing up that you actually were intending to say "its my opinion to dislike and or not listen to the music of Michael jackson" when you SAID "Michael Jackson is a talentless hack." It just takes some time for us non "music community" folk to catch on to these sort of trivals.... |
| its_a_hard_life 26994 05.07.2006 03:59 |
Jackson de Michael está bem, nada especial... Hahaha |
| ilvcats 05.07.2006 22:29 |
I concur. LOL! |
| user name 06.07.2006 19:38 |
deadbird wrote: to MusicMan: That was a very nice "rebuttal", there, as you called it, but after reading the whole thing over I kind of thought to myself, "hm, this guy kind of basically said 'ok, so yeah he has talent... but some popular things get big and dont have talent... and it's my opinion that I dont like M.Jackson" alright. thats great that thats your opinion. NO one has a problem with your opinion. Thing is this. I dunno what "music community" youre referring to... but gengerally, in the um... world, the word "talentless" is used to describe... a lack of talent: and what we were saying was, "woah, wait a second. Thats a riduculous statement to make about Michael Jackson." So, thanks, I guess, for clearing up that you actually were intending to say "its my opinion to dislike and or not listen to the music of Michael jackson" when you SAID "Michael Jackson is a talentless hack." It just takes some time for us non "music community" folk to catch on to these sort of trivals....No offense, but if you have never referred to or heard various pop musicians been referred to as talentless, then you are among the minority. When I think of musical talent, having a decent singing voice and dancing and choreographing very well are not at the top of my list. Anyone who has ever complained about pop music in the 90's knows exactly what I'm talking about. As a man who favors rock, there are other traits which appeal to me. That is basically what I was saying. You could say that mixing and production is the thing you look for in a band. This takes plenty of talent, but if a band is known for these particular traits, I will refer to them as talentless. In the future, perhaps bands will be known for their ability to produce clay pots, clearly a skill that takes talent. I don't care. I will still think of them as talentless when I think of music. There are so many types of talent in this world. Practically anything can be considered a talent. Therefore, that is why I admit Michael is talented. That is all. |
| deleted user 06.07.2006 20:36 |
You know what I think of Michael Jackson ? He killed Freddie Mercury and totally stole his look from the 70's. I mean, have you SEEN the man ? He's pale, has long, straight, black layered hair, skinny little nose, scary little cheek-bones, and hollowish cheeks in general - who am I describing ? Well, I guess if it were Freddie, I would have to mention abuse of Ivory foundation - not mysterious who-knows-what palefication. And that one glove thing. PUH-leeze. |
| M a t i a s M a y 07.07.2006 04:50 |
He has some really greeeeat songs He's a BRILLIANT singer, absolutely He's an outstanding dancer He is god, because... he's not male, not female, not white, not black... He must be god!!! BWHAHAA Michael Jackson rockssssssss |