Official???
All I am saying is that if there is money to change hands... We should be payed for having to listen to this piece of shit.
This song is without a doubt the worst Queen related item in history, including 'Ice Ice Baby'.
If I had to look far and wide for a one and only worst song by Queen themselves, I would probably squeak out 'Jesus' as my answer. 'No Turning Back' is 1000 times worse.
"Who cares?"
RIAA, EMI, Hollywood Records, Parlophone Records, etc.
...or people and/or companies that can OTHERWISE make money off of official products (regardless of crappiness or not)
ED: And also, people who care about this website a lot to make sure otherwise that it won't get shut down by the above mentioned companies. Obviously you don't care, pinstack.
<b><FONT SIZE=4>Inu-Liger</b> wrote: "Who cares?"
RIAA, EMI, Hollywood Records, Parlophone Records, etc.
...or people and/or companies that can OTHERWISE make money off of official products (regardless of crappiness or not)
ED: And also, people who care about this website a lot to make sure otherwise that it won't get shut down by the above mentioned companies. Obviously you don't care, pinstack.
Hypocrite?
Geez - What is so hard about playing by the rules on Queenzone? Please show consideration to Richard Orchard and the users of this site. Record companies have shut down Queen websites before. Several years ago, Mr Scully's old website was shut down for a reason so inane that I cannot recall it. The record industry is very fickle and unpredictable and can shut this place down for sharing bootleg concerts if it wants to.
Please just respect the rules. It is not that hard.
Rip Van Winkle wrote: Hypocrite?
Geez - What is so hard about playing by the rules on Queenzone? Please show consideration to Richard Orchard and the users of this site. Record companies have shut down Queen websites before. Several years ago, Mr Scully's old website was shut down for a reason so inane that I cannot recall it. The record industry is very fickle and unpredictable and can shut this place down for sharing bootleg concerts if it wants to.
Please just respect the rules. It is not that hard.
I think you completely missed the point. As far as I know, Thanks always followed the rules of Queenzone. I think that the reason he called "Inu-Liger" an hypocrite is related to the "Teo Torriate High Definition Mix Accident" or similar things.
I could be wrong, though.
Rip Van Winkle wrote: Hypocrite?
Geez - What is so hard about playing by the rules on Queenzone? Please show consideration to Richard Orchard and the users of this site. Record companies have shut down Queen websites before. Several years ago, Mr Scully's old website was shut down for a reason so inane that I cannot recall it. The record industry is very fickle and unpredictable and can shut this place down for sharing bootleg concerts if it wants to.
Please just respect the rules. It is not that hard.
I think you completely missed the point. As far as I know, Thanks always followed the rules of Queenzone. I think that the reason he called "Inu-Liger" an hypocrite is related to the "Teo Torriate High Definition Mix Accident" or similar things.
I could be wrong, though.
I believe too that he is referring to that particular incident.
Also, I'm still getting e-mails occassionally asking for that mix. PLEASE STOP, kindly.
<b><FONT SIZE=4>Inu-Liger</b> wrote: "Who cares?"
RIAA, EMI, Hollywood Records, Parlophone Records, etc.
...or people and/or companies that can OTHERWISE make money off of official products (regardless of crappiness or not)
ED: And also, people who care about this website a lot to make sure otherwise that it won't get shut down by the above mentioned companies. Obviously you don't care, pinstack.
