| Micrówave 31.01.2006 14:34 |
I mean, why not? Or we could talk about fish. |
| flash! 28068 31.01.2006 14:35 |
Tuna smells awful, i must say! |
| Freya is quietly judging you. 31.01.2006 14:35 |
Nah, can we talk about cheese some more? |
| magicalfreddiemercury 31.01.2006 14:36 |
Do you think Freddie liked cheese? |
| Freya is quietly judging you. 31.01.2006 14:40 |
Cheese is ruining Cheeses legacy! Cheese should fuck off and make cheese on his own! NO CHEESE NO CHEESE CHEESE DIED IN 1991 |
| Micrówave 31.01.2006 14:45 |
When I get a Filet O Fish at McDonalds, I prefer mine with Cheese. It makes me think that Brian and Roger would not like it and Paul would. |
| englishyob 31.01.2006 14:50 |
a wise man once said "who is more foolish the fool or the fool who follows" i think this saying can be put to all these stupid topics |
| Micrówave 31.01.2006 15:06 |
Obi-Wan Kenobi? And he is where now? DEAD! |
| Llisos 31.01.2006 17:02 |
Fish? The first Marillion' singer??? |
| KillerQueen1429 31.01.2006 17:26 |
LMAO u guys r crazy....ur crackin me up!! |
| bryans permed poodle 15069 31.01.2006 17:50 |
TeaKettleResurrection wrote: Paul is ruining Queens legacy! Paul should fuck off and make money on his own! NO FREDDIE NO QUEEN QUEEN DIED IN 1991Apparently he was busking before Brian and Roger picked him off the streets. Poor chap. |
| The prophet's song 31.01.2006 18:27 |
I could so tell Pauly has had some plastic surgery, he's so old and he sure doesn't look it. Personally, I have little respect for people who have plastic surgery to "improve" their looks. People are starving in the world and all they care about is having huge tits and no wrinkels. I'm gonna age gracefully. |
| Micrówave 31.01.2006 18:34 |
Llisos wrote: Fish? The first Marillion' singer???Marillion's only singer!!! The new stuff is NOT Marillion. Steve Hogarth is ruining the legacy of ..er ooh. kinda typed myself into a corner here. I like to eat. |
| deleted user 31.01.2006 19:12 |
DOOOOOOOON"T YOOOUUU KNOW THAT YOU ARE A SHOOOOOTIN STARRRR AN ALLL DA WLD WIL LVE YOU JUS AS LLLLLLLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNNNNNNGG LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONG AS YOU ARE A SHOOTING STARRRRRRRRRR bow bow bow bow ba ba ba bow bow dow dow dow dow budabu buda bow bow *fades* Bad Company Rocks |
| biggest_fan_K 31.01.2006 19:36 |
Paul sucks and his songs suck too |
| Martin Stones 31.01.2006 21:34 |
his toupe is so cool tho lol |
| bohemianrhap84 31.01.2006 22:03 |
you guys are hillarious. PR is definitely not being ruined by Brian and Roger or as I like to call them "half-queen". He is probably making more money from the Queen + Paul Rodgers tour than he's ever made with Free or Bad Company or anyone else. He definitely benefits from the spotlight of the Queen name. On the other hand I don't think he's ruining Brian and Roger although I don't feel his voice suits the Queen catalog with the exception of a couple songs. I'm not one to say that Paul sucks but if you listen to ROTC and his performance of The Show Must Go On and you don't consider sticking a fork in your eye then you're not normal. Anyway, I think he's a good singer, just not suited for Queen. Although he's making a hell of a lot of $ from the Queen spotlight. God I wish Freddie was still here. |
| That guy who digs energy domes 31.01.2006 22:25 |
Paul Rodgers was all right then and he is ALL RIGHT NOW! |
| All I Hear Is Radio Gaga 31.01.2006 22:31 |
Paul is great...all I have to say is this is one of the most confusing topics I have ever read...I think I'm going to go have some cheese.... |
| bmayfan61 31.01.2006 22:32 |
......Paul Rodgers has big tits? |
| That guy who digs energy domes 31.01.2006 22:36 |
HAH! You all talk like you know cheese but I AND ONLY I AM THE TRUE CHEESEHEAD HERE! SO KISS MY ASS, MY WHITE-CHEESY ASS CALIFORNIA BECAUSE WISCONSIN CHEESE STILL RULES! Sheboygan- Town of 4 C's Chairs Churches CHEESE Children |
| Kensington Love 31.01.2006 22:48 |
<font color=red>Flash! wrote: Tuna smells awful, i must say!LOL! Awww,Flash! you are too cute! ;) |
| Kensington Love 31.01.2006 22:50 |
magicalfreddiemercury wrote: Do you think Freddie liked cheese?You call me sweet like I'm some kinda cheese.........;) |
| dorahc 01.02.2006 00:22 |
I don't really care for Paul Rodgers, but I will give the man credit. He is doing the best job he can do. Noone can replace Freddie- He is irreplaceable! The way I look at is you have a group of talented musicians, who love to perform and got together to do so. Paul Rodgers may not be the right person to sing Queen songs, but he is at least making an attempt whether it be bad or good! |
| Mr Drowse 01.02.2006 03:56 |
Parmigiano anyone? |
| kerfuffle87 01.02.2006 05:33 |
<font color=violet>Poppy wrote: Cheese is ruining Cheeses legacy! Cheese should fuck off and make cheese on his own! NO CHEESE NO CHEESE CHEESE DIED IN 1991Lol. Loving it.I know this place is a democracy, but jeez louise it's always the same old Queen RIP 1991 business, you moaners (and i'm of course not referring to you Poppy!) cant change any of Roger and Brian's decisions so leave em be and stop whinging like a baby about it. I believe it's now high time for some wonderful Weneslydale(sp!) :D |
| Fenderek 01.02.2006 05:41 |
Oh, I thought you weretalking me... Mr Weneslydale, that's my name... |
| Hippolyte 01.02.2006 07:56 |
Queen Of Wrestling<h6>Jamie's Slave</h6> wrote: Paul Rodgers was all right then and he is ALL RIGHT NOW!As are Paul's awful jokes apparently. |
| flash! 28068 01.02.2006 08:22 |
I'm glad Queen are going to stop touring with cheese. Cheese just isn't the same after Freddie died... I don't think cheese could fully cope without Freddie... thats why, lately, it has tasted a little mouldy... time for cheese to retire! RIP CHEESE! |
| flash! 28068 01.02.2006 08:23 |
...as for the fish...well, fish could never take the place of cheese and work with Queen. It would make Brian stink! |
| kerfuffle87 01.02.2006 18:50 |
Fenderek wrote: Oh, I thought you weretalking me... Mr Weneslydale, that's my name...Teehee what a wonderful name you have, people often calls me cam, its short for camembert you know? might get it changed to wedneslydale though as i'm not french :( |
| teleman 01.02.2006 22:00 |
<font color=red>Flash! wrote: I'm glad Queen are going to stop touring with cheese. Cheese just isn't the same after Freddie died... I don't think cheese could fully cope without Freddie... thats why, lately, it has tasted a little mouldy... time for cheese to retire! RIP CHEESE!RIPE CHEESE! |
| The Real Wizard 03.02.2006 22:37 |
2pink wrote: I agree, he should fuck off, because nobody wants him!All 500,000+ who saw Paul, Brian, and Roger completely agree with you. Here is an honest question for BPP, Sharon, TeaKettleResurrection, and all the rest of you Freddie fundamentalists who can't get over the fact that Freddie died, yet the band Queen continue in some form: Did all of the following bands commit cardinal sin by pursuing their musical interests with the band's name after losing a key member for whatever reason? All are striking cases: Rolling Stones without Brian Jones AC/DC without Bon Scott Chicago without Terry Kath, and later without Peter Cetera The Who without Keith Moon, and later without John Entwistle Supertramp without Roger Hodgson Deep Purple without Richie Blackmore, and later without Jon Lord INXS without Michael Hutchence Smashing Pumpkins possibly reuniting without James Iha? (D'arcy Wretzky quit after a few albums too) I am most interested in the responses of at least a half dozen certain people. |
| biggest_fan_K 04.02.2006 19:39 |
Freddie almost made the band. Was Brian Jones a big part of RS? no Was Bon Scott of AC/DC? no without Freddie i dont see Queen Queen died with Freddie and Brian&Roger should let Queen go, because theres nothing they can do to bring Queen back. I think they should go as Smile, because they arent Queen. Its just a memory of a legendary band now |
| That guy who digs energy domes 04.02.2006 19:54 |
Kingdoms wax and wane; Empires cleave asunder and coalesce When the districts of Zhou weakened, the seven principalities sprang up Warring with one another until they settled as Qin and when Qin had fufilled its destiny Arose Han and Chu to contend for the mastery and Liu Beng of Han was the victor |
| Kensington Love 05.02.2006 01:19 |
biggest_fan_K wrote: Freddie almost made the band. Was Brian Jones a big part of RS? no Was Bon Scott of AC/DC? no without Freddie i dont see Queen Queen died with Freddie and Brian&Roger should let Queen go, because theres nothing they can do to bring Queen back. I think they should go as Smile, because they arent Queen. Its just a memory of a legendary band nowI believe,darling,that Freddie wanted Brian and Roger(and John)to continue. And wherever he is now,I'm sure he is watching with content and does not mind Brian and Roger keeping Queen alive;) |
| The Real Wizard 05.02.2006 01:45 |
biggest_fan_K wrote: Freddie almost made the band. Was Brian Jones a big part of RS? no Was Bon Scott of AC/DC? no without Freddie i dont see Queen Queen died with Freddie and Brian&Roger should let Queen go, because theres nothing they can do to bring Queen back. I think they should go as Smile, because they arent Queen. Its just a memory of a legendary band nowOne reply... typical. But my point was for all of the examples to be refuted... not just a select couple. How about Pink Floyd without Syd Barrett, and later without Roger Waters? My point is: so many bands have lost a key member and continued. It's nothing new. I can't believe all the whining and complaining that has gone on here, all because the founding members of Queen are still using the band name. |
| Wiley 05.02.2006 14:18 |
About those cases of bands going on without key members I'm most familiar with the Pink Floyd case. They actually lost TWO key members and kept going and I was always surprised by it. I mean, you could argue that Syd Barret "was" Pink Floyd at the begining as Freddie "was" Queen. Syd was the true superstar, excentric and wrote most of the songs in their first couple of albums. Should they have quit in 1968?? We wouldn't have The Wall, Wish You Were Here, Meddle and other great albums. Now THAT would have been a sin! Many bands do it all over again. I can imagine Van Halen fans being partial to one of their frontmen as, maybe, some James Bond fans being partial to Sean Connery or Roger Moore as being their favorite 007. You can say one is better than the other, but I don't see the point in bitching about something to the level of calling it a blasphemy, which it clearly isn't. I'd say that every band's case is different, but some of them have found (a tremendous amount of)success after losing one or more original members. I'm not very familiar with Van Halen's case but it's sometimes refered as being a good example of bands carrying out without their original members. I heard on a TV show that David Lee Roth was like the original Coke everybody liked; Sammy Haggar was like Pepsi, a little sweeter in taste but good; and that Gary Cherone was like RC Cola, and no-one really got that, hehe :). Another example: I know there was this discontent when the Beatle's original drummer was sacked in favor of Ringo Starr. I can almost imagine all the BPP's of the sixties saying NO PETE NO BEATLES, RIP BEATLES 1962. I know this case is an exaggeration but, well, many other "Queen fundamentalists" are, so sue me. There has to be something a band has to keep in order to make this successful transition. I would like to believe this Queen+PR colaboration is going to last but I know it won't, so I'm enjoying it the best I can. For God's sake... it's Queen! they're back on the road! You can stay at home, listen to your records and live in the past. There's nothing wrong about it. Now, spamming the board, that IS WRONG. The fact that most of the other not so fundamentalistic Queen fans are by far more reasonable persons doesn't mean that you can actually make us change our minds about it. But, then again, I really don't believe this Poodle guy saying Paul Rodgers sucks and prefering Robbie Williams. I like Robbie, I like many of his songs, but I don't think Brian and Roger would've looked good touring with him. Well, this post is endless. I'm sorry I wrote this much but I think it's better to organize your ideas and actually make an argument instead of just spamming this board. The only bad thing that this new tour brought was some of the most annoying spammers this board has ever known, but in the end, there's far more good in this. Queen has always been a controversial band and it's good that they're actually making some buzz once again. Rock on Queen!... :) Wiley |
| calcium 05.02.2006 15:15 |
Yeah you don't understand one thing buddy, ITS NOT QUEEN. And you're comparing Freddie to some drummer. Freddie was the most important member of Queen, without him, there isn't Queen. |
| Sherwood Forest 05.02.2006 15:17 |
i rreally hate fish, i dont eat it ever, i refuse to |
| biggest_fan_K 05.02.2006 15:26 |
calcium wrote: Yeah you don't understand one thing buddy, ITS NOT QUEEN. And you're comparing Freddie to some drummer. Freddie was the most important member of Queen, without him, there isn't Queen. i agree with you |
| englishyob 05.02.2006 17:05 |
JamieSureWould what wrong with fish i real like fish me especially with chips |
| Sherwood Forest 05.02.2006 17:07 |
englishyob wrote: JamieSureWould what wrong with fish i real like fish me especially with chipsidk ever since i went scuba diving and saw how cute they were down under the ocean i was like aww im not eating them. PLUS it smells gasly |
| Wiley 05.02.2006 17:10 |
You're right, it's not Queen. It's Queen+Paul Rodgers. It says so in the publicity and there's nothing you or anyone can do about it. I said that the Beatles' drummer case was an exageration but why don't you consider the case of Pink Floyd? Syd Barret was as important to early Pink Floyd as Freddie was for Queen; also Roger Waters, 15 years later. It would be interesting to see what other band's fans think about those band lineup changes. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. You can like or not like this new tour with Paul Rodgers, you can go or not go at all, but I'm sick about reading the same old "this is not Queen" argument. It was briefly mentioned every time Brian and Roger appeared in some TV show or as guests in someone else's concert under the name Queen but it's been discussed to death and it gets really booooring. Now, for a change, someone asks for opinions about other bands' cases and other people say that no other band can compare to Queen. I mean, I know this is a Queen forum, and I'm a loyal fan and collector of the band, but this "RIP QUEEN 1991" thing is very annoying. Let's talk some other band's cases and see the same phenomenon under different eyes, OR let's talk about what Queen or their band members are currently doing. And what they are doing now is this "QUEEN PLUS PAUL RODGERS TOUR", wether we like it or not :). Wiley |
| LadyMoonshineDown 05.02.2006 17:11 |
Er.... ....chicken? Deep fried? And remember who created the cheese topic... ...that's right, it was me, in one of those redundant posts about Mr. Rogers a while back. So wham bam thank you ma'am. I own. ;) Cheers |
| englishyob 05.02.2006 17:27 |
your right Wiley its time for some people to grow up and get on with life. Brain and Roger can do what ever they like with the Queen name as long as it keeps Queen and Freddie’s Music alive. Someone has to before the pop crap idol rubbish takes over the music world |
| englishyob 05.02.2006 17:30 |
p.s. add grow up and learn to read YES WE ALL KNOW IT NOT QUEEN DUM ARSE IT'S QUEEN + PAUL RODGERS |
| Freya is quietly judging you. 05.02.2006 17:32 |
JamieSureWould<br><font size=1>QOQOW wrote: i rreally hate fish, i dont eat it ever, i refuse toI like some fish..I like salmon.. |
| bryans permed poodle 15069 05.02.2006 17:37 |
KensingtonLove(Dharankanawala) wrote:That is obsurd Brian, Roger and John knew the game was up for Queen when Freddie died. Infact all 3 made public statements confirming Queen could not continue as a band shortly after Freddie's death in 1991. FACT. It doesn't matter whether it is now Queen + Queen in any shape or form ended in 1991. FACT. John At least had the common decency to retire and di-associate himself from this project. The fact he has stayed silent on this project doesn't come across as a big endorsement does it ?. When you had a unique singer that defines a band anything else further down the line doesn't work. Brian and Roger's motives need to be questioned. Both seemed happy doing solo projects during the last 15 years. Just leave Queen alone. They should go join one of Paul Rodgers bands if they love him so much.biggest_fan_K wrote: Freddie almost made the band. Was Brian Jones a big part of RS? no Was Bon Scott of AC/DC? no without Freddie i dont see Queen Queen died with Freddie and Brian&Roger should let Queen go, because theres nothing they can do to bring Queen back. I think they should go as Smile, because they arent Queen. Its just a memory of a legendary band nowI believe,darling,that Freddie wanted Brian and Roger(and John)to continue. And wherever he is now,I'm sure he is watching with content and does not mind Brian and Roger keeping Queen alive;) |
| Wiley 05.02.2006 17:52 |
I know this has nothing to do with Queen but it somehow remembered me about some QZoners, hehe :). It's from the mi6.co.uk forum for James Bond 007 fans. This guy is disappointed after seeing two Daniel Craig pictures in the new Bond movie Casino Royale: "I´ve seen the pictures of Craig on the net of him as Bond and all I can say is that I want James Bond 007 not XXX Xander Cage...I have said that I´m willing to give him a chance as Bond but I can´t no longer,No matter how hard I try I just can´t except him as Bond.I´ve removed the Craig in the Tux from my PC which I had as a screensaver to try to get used to the idea of Craig as Bond...It hasn´t worked and the pictures on the Net has proved my first instincts were right...to me,in my opinion he´s not Bond...and never will be in mind or my heart...IMHO James Bond R.I.P...1962-2002 I will leave this forum now and I hope that all of ye Craig supprters will enjoy Casino Royale...." I hope this guy doesn't do something stupid in his deep depression. Still, I just had to love the James Bond RIP 1962-2002 thing, hahaha :). Regarding what Brian, Roger and John said right after Freddie's death, well, someone can change their minds. Brian didn't feel comfortable being Queen in the nineties, now he does. Roger always wanted to tour and now both are having a great time. This supposed "Facts" refer to opinions stated by individuals in a given moment of their lives and they are able to change, as they have done some time ago. I'm just happy about that Strat Pack gig where Brian and Paul hit it off and decided to take it a step further. 30% of the current posters in this board wouldn't be here if it wasn't for this tour, hehe :). Wiley |
| The Real Wizard 05.02.2006 18:01 |
Wiley wrote: Now, for a change, someone asks for opinions about other bands' cases and other people say that no other band can compare to Queen.Fantastic post, Wiley. I had to highlight this particular point above. You're so right... there's no way to talk to these people. But it's simply called ignorance. They think Queen are the centre of the world, and clearly they have no clue about the history of the Stones, Floyd, Supertramp, The Who, Deep Purple, INXS, AC/DC, or any of the other bands who continued on after losing an important member. There will always be blind and anti-intellectual people everywhere you go. Remember, as George Carlin once said: think about everyone you meet during your day, and pick out the average one; half of them are stupider than that! |
| englishyob 05.02.2006 18:05 |
Bryans Permed Pants wrote:KensingtonLove(Dharankanawala) wrote:biggest_fan_K wrote: Freddie almost made the band. Was Brian Jones a big part of RS? no Was Bon Scott of AC/DC? no without Freddie i dont see Queen Queen died with Freddie and Brian&Roger should let Queen go, because theres nothing they can do to bring Queen back. I think they should go as Smile, because they arent Queen. Its just a memory of a legendary band nowChange the f**king record man when something bad like a death happens people say stupid stuff, if Freddie didn’t when them to continue why did he work on the final songs until he couldn’t physically do so anymore. He could have told them to f**k off he’s doing no more but he didn’t he died doing what he loved and he would of wanted his music to live on when he died. The guy was and still is a legend he loved music and he loved entertaining people. |
| englishyob 05.02.2006 18:13 |
sado I here there giving away a new life at your local corner shop better go get one before there all gone... hurry run quick you might get a good one.................. RIP Freddie it's ok Queen's and your music is in good hands we'll never let you die |
| englishyob 05.02.2006 18:19 |
fuck you cunt go kill yourself every heard of dyslexia i hope all your unborn children have it as long as people get what I’m on about I don’t care at least I can say more then "RIP QUEEN & FREDDIE" like some "retard!" |
| englishyob 05.02.2006 19:07 |
well I hope it has dyslexia and go's though what I went thought and believe me its not nice or easy |
| LadyMoonshineDown 05.02.2006 19:12 |
Hey hey now children- Let us not quibble, or Ms. LadyMoonShineDown will have to beat both of you senseless. Cheers |
| That guy who digs energy domes 05.02.2006 22:39 |
The problem isnt air pollution, its just that our air isnt the cleanest. |
| Fenderek 06.02.2006 05:01 |
Fucking Cheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeese |
| Wiley 06.02.2006 11:23 |
TeaKettleResurrection wrote: RIP Freddie and Queen.Oh yes, that's the good stuff. Why even bother posting the same thing over and over again? Now I know why some users start new topics, since these things tend to end up 10 pages full of the same shit over and over again. I was hoping maybe someone (apart from Sir GH) would come up with arguments to support one or the other opinion but I guess that's asking a lot, hehe :). I was actually interested in listening about those other band's cases. Maybe someone would actually take the time and discuss why they think these cases have absolutely nothing to do with Queen. Sometimes it's hard to accept it but Queen is just another band, you know? You could go to a Pink Floyd or even a Kiss forum and there would be some people saying Queen were shit, even WITH Freddie. Now you might be upset about it. Well, those are the "KissZone" or "PinkFloydZone" equivalent of some of you guys in here. People intelligent enough for me to care about them would know I'm not refering to them. Sorry I tried to find some rationality in here. I'll go and see other threads, hehe :). Wiley |
| magicalfreddiemercury 06.02.2006 12:34 |
I think the bottom line here is that Queen and Paul Rodgers are touring, have been touring and will continue to tour with the name "QUEEN and PAUL RODGERS". You can R.I.P. all you want - the DVD has the name, the CD has the name, the tickets, the billboards, these threads and history will have the name Queen and Paul Rodgers. You're complaining, you're whining... you're rushing headlong, outta control and there's nothing, nothing, nothing you can do about it at all... |
| Freya is quietly judging you. 06.02.2006 12:37 |
Um...Cheese anyone? |
| bryans permed poodle 15069 06.02.2006 15:12 |
englishyob wrote: fuck you cunt go kill yourself every heard of dyslexia i hope all your unborn children have it as long as people get what I’m on about I don’t care at least I can say more then "RIP QUEEN & FREDDIE" like some "retard!"Come on English Yob you can't keep blaming dyslexia on everything. Chin up mate Dodgy Rodgers will gone for good soon. My God who will they choice next. Not worth thinking about. |
| That guy who digs energy domes 06.02.2006 21:41 |
magicalfreddiemercury wrote: I think the bottom line here is that Queen and Paul Rodgers are touring, have been touring and will continue to tour with the name "QUEEN and PAUL RODGERS". You can R.I.P. all you want - the DVD has the name, the CD has the name, the tickets, the billboards, these threads and history will have the name Queen and Paul Rodgers. You're complaining, you're whining... you're rushing headlong, outta control and there's nothing, nothing, nothing you can do about it at all...Thank you Beth. |
| magicalfreddiemercury 06.02.2006 22:27 |
Queen Of Wrestling<h6>Jamie's Slave</h6> wrote:Oh... um... well... you're welcome.... Edgar.magicalfreddiemercury wrote: I think the bottom line here is that Queen and Paul Rodgers are touring, have been touring and will continue to tour with the name "QUEEN and PAUL RODGERS". You can R.I.P. all you want - the DVD has the name, the CD has the name, the tickets, the billboards, these threads and history will have the name Queen and Paul Rodgers. You're complaining, you're whining... you're rushing headlong, outta control and there's nothing, nothing, nothing you can do about it at all...Thank you Beth. ??????? Who is Beth? |
| That guy who digs energy domes 06.02.2006 22:39 |
Your email thing says Bethany Moyer |
| magicalfreddiemercury 06.02.2006 22:41 |
Queen Of Wrestling<h6>Jamie's Slave</h6> wrote: Your email thing says Bethany MoyerMine? Hmmm. Check again... I don't have an email 'thing'. And if I did... no offense to Ms. Bethany Moyer... but that ain't me. You'll just have to trust me on that. :-) |
| Wiley 10.02.2006 13:13 |
snow flakey wrote: Haha. One problem though, it will not sell, they are losing even more fans! All thanks to that asswipe Paul that had to ruin everything. Then again, people are way desparate and will take any scraps from the table. This is what some of you sound like: "Even though its not real Queen, ([Some stupid people think that this really is Queen though. New/Young fans mostly]) and that asswipe is ruinging Freddies songs, its fine, BECAUSE WE WILL TAKE ANYTHING!" Sad. Queen is gone. This is just Brian and Roger and that scum.Do you really THINK they are losing fans over this?? I would actually think it's the other way around. They are touring, they are bringing Queen and Paul Rodger's music to an audience, they're making a buzz, they sold out most of their shows so far. I think that it was very risky to book that many shows in the US, some of them very close to the other (and skipping Texas, btw) and maybe not all of them will sell out but the tour is on. Maybe some of their older or more traditional fans do not like the idea of this tour. I think that this group if a minority. I saw lots of middle aged men and women having the time of their lives in the 4 shows I went to in Europe. I have this image of some lady looking at her younger days' heroes and seeming mesmerized by it, and this other lady in her fourties headbanging to Bohemian Rhapsody. There's something really special about these shows. Maybe it doesn't sound exactly the same, but the spirit of the band is there. Freddie is remembered in the show several times and Brian and Roger sing some songs. You say you want Brian and Roger to play but not under the name Queen because it's supposed to be some cardinal sin and they're pissing on their leacy. Well, guess what? they can do whatever they want and their legacy is going nowhere. What's the point on being angry and negative about it? what's the point of spamming a board to repeat the same old "RIP QUEEN 1991" crap all over again? If you want to talk about pre 1991 Queen, you can do so in this same board. You can talk about the music, things you discover in Queen songs, your favorite albums, favorite versions of songs, Queen live, discuss the contents of the future box sets to come, rarities you posess, make contact with fans, talk about Queen conventions, etc. I'm not talking about constructive and comprehensive posts like Mr. John S. Stuart's Ultimate Collection or Sir GH's complete Live Killers analysis but I'm sure you can do better than this "ditch Paul" crappy posts. Actually, I think I can do better than this "negative spammers, make up your mind and get a freaking life" kind of posts. :) See ya, Wiley |
| magicalfreddiemercury 10.02.2006 13:21 |
Excellent post, Wiley. Very well said. <applauds> Sadly, you're trying logic on the illogical. I've done it myself a few posts back. It doesn't work. They'll just come back with the same nonsense. Too bad for them. |
| deleted user 10.02.2006 13:30 |
Honestly I don't think Freddie cares. If they weren't touring with Paul and someone else you guys would bash that person too. |
| englishyob 20.02.2006 17:01 |
and just to finish the off YAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWN STILL BORING GROW UP CHILDREN |
| TeaKettlesResurrection 20.02.2006 17:07 |