salQF 03.12.2005 19:06 |
I'm just wondering if anyone can provide some info on the guitar solo on Innuendo which is as far as I know called 'Somewhere in the Middle'. I'd just like to know who the original artist was, if any guitar tablature/ recording exists anywhere and so on. Ta. |
jcrawford79 03.12.2005 19:22 |
None called Somewhere in the Middle. I'm not sure if you are referencing the song or the album but if you're talking about the album, the song is called Bijou. If you're talking about the song, the flamenco part was played the guy from Yes (Steve Howe, I think is his name) and the rest was played by Brian. |
jcrawford79 03.12.2005 19:23 |
In reply to the rest of your question, these are the original versions. They were written by members of Queen. I've never seen any tabs for them but I'm sure they are around somewhere. |
jcrawford79 03.12.2005 19:26 |
link Here's a link for the chords in Innuendo but I couldn't find tabs. |
The Real Wizard 04.12.2005 13:15 |
jcrawford79 wrote: None called Somewhere in the Middle. I'm not sure if you are referencing the song or the album but if you're talking about the album, the song is called Bijou. If you're talking about the song, the flamenco part was played the guy from Yes (Steve Howe, I think is his name) and the rest was played by Brian."I think is his name" ... ? How about, the brilliant guitarist from Yes and Asia who, from a technical perspective, is a much better guitarist than Brian May ? Tastes are tastes, but Howe is by far a better guitarist. But May is still my favourite. |
jcrawford79 04.12.2005 14:07 |
Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote:I'm not really sure how to reply to this. I must've been misleading in my post. I know absolutely nothing about Steve Howe so I certainly didn't mean to imply that he's a lesser guitarist. I was only attempting to answer a question. Sorry for the apparently misleading statement.jcrawford79 wrote: None called Somewhere in the Middle. I'm not sure if you are referencing the song or the album but if you're talking about the album, the song is called Bijou. If you're talking about the song, the flamenco part was played the guy from Yes (Steve Howe, I think is his name) and the rest was played by Brian."I think is his name" ... ? How about, the brilliant guitarist from Yes and Asia who, from a technical perspective, is a much better guitarist than Brian May ? Tastes are tastes, but Howe is by far a better guitarist. But May is still my favourite. |
The Real Wizard 04.12.2005 14:36 |
jcrawford79 wrote: I'm not really sure how to reply to this. I must've been misleading in my post. I know absolutely nothing about Steve Howe so I certainly didn't mean to imply that he's a lesser guitarist. I was only attempting to answer a question. Sorry for the apparently misleading statement.No worries, my friend. :) But if you're interested in rock music fused with classical, you like vocal harmonies, and you appreciate top quality musicianship, then Yes may certainly be a band you would enjoy. In many ways, they influenced the early Queen sound. Particularly, the song "I've Seen All Good People" is clearly what inspired Doing All Right, both in terms of chords and structure (slow and fast parts). |
jcrawford79 04.12.2005 14:39 |
I'm almost embarassed to admit this but the reason I've never listened to Yes or Asia is because the only songs I know are Owner of a Lonely Heart and Heat of the Moment and they seem a little to "poppy" for me. But I know that's pathetic, kinda like saying I don't really like Queen because Body Language sucks. Hold on, isn't Roundabout by Yes?? I do know that song. And its pretty incredible....great bass line. Anyway, I will have to give them a listen. |
The Real Wizard 04.12.2005 14:41 |
Oh dear, those are the poppy things! Although that's great stuff, it's nothing like their progressive stuff in the 70s. Get the Fragile, Close To The Edge, Relayer, and Going For The One albums to start! Indeed, Roundabout is on Fragile. If you like Roundabout, then you'll probably like much of their other 70s stuff. |
Lester Burnham 04.12.2005 14:42 |
I don't want to derail this thread, but considering it is Queen related, then I'm not too concerned. Check out Fragile, Close To The Edge, Relayer, Going For The One, and even Tormato and Drama by Yes - all spectacular albums before they became "pop" with 90125 (or 90215, I can't remember). Surprisingly, it was Tormato that got me into Yes, although it could be considered their Jazz - not really a good place to start, but hey, whatever works. edit: damn you, Bob! Great minds think alike, I guess. |
The Real Wizard 04.12.2005 14:42 |
lol @ Lester!! Jcrawford: I swear, we didn't correspond before posting!! Lester, I remember your email, and I promise, I will get to it!! |
jcrawford79 04.12.2005 14:43 |
That's funny. I should buy the CDs today because that was apparently a sign from above! |
Lester Burnham 04.12.2005 15:31 |
Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote: lol @ Lester!! Jcrawford: I swear, we didn't correspond before posting!! Lester, I remember your email, and I promise, I will get to it!!Alrighty, I just wasn't sure if that email address was the right one or not - take your time! |
Boy Thomas Raker 04.12.2005 21:14 |
Lester, do you love Release, Release on Tormato? I think that my be the most joyous keyboard playing I've heard in my life. Brilliant stuff. |
Lester Burnham 04.12.2005 21:42 |
Yes (hurr), I'm a huge fan of 'Release Release', though I think my favorite off that album is 'Future Times / Rejoice'. In fact, the only two songs I can't stand are 'Madrigal' and 'Circus Of Heaven'. There's nothing like the bass work in 'Arriving UFO', though - Chris Squire is simply amazing. |
The Real Wizard 04.12.2005 23:18 |
Lester Burnham wrote: Yes (hurr), I'm a huge fan of 'Release Release', though I think my favorite off that album is 'Future Times / Rejoice'. In fact, the only two songs I can't stand are 'Madrigal' and 'Circus Of Heaven'. There's nothing like the bass work in 'Arriving UFO', though - Chris Squire is simply amazing.Ah man, I love the whole album. The keys in Circus are soooooo pretty. But yeah, Release Release is probably the strongest track on that one, I think. |
groover 05.12.2005 00:00 |
Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote:Are you sure about that? Ive Seen All Good People was released commercially in 1971. Wasnt Doin' All Right written b4 then.jcrawford79 wrote: I'm not really sure how to reply to this. I must've been misleading in my post. I know absolutely nothing about Steve Howe so I certainly didn't mean to imply that he's a lesser guitarist. I was only attempting to answer a question. Sorry for the apparently misleading statement.No worries, my friend. :) But if you're interested in rock music fused with classical, you like vocal harmonies, and you appreciate top quality musicianship, then Yes may certainly be a band you would enjoy. In many ways, they influenced the early Queen sound. Particularly, the song "I've Seen All Good People" is clearly what inspired Doing All Right, both in terms of chords and structure (slow and fast parts). I'm a huge fan of both. However, I have never thought the two bands were remotely similar. |
groover 05.12.2005 00:04 |
Lester Burnham wrote: I don't want to derail this thread, but considering it is Queen related, then I'm not too concerned. Check out Fragile, Close To The Edge, Relayer, Going For The One, and even Tormato and Drama by Yes - all spectacular albums before they became "pop" with 90125 (or 90215, I can't remember). Surprisingly, it was Tormato that got me into Yes, although it could be considered their Jazz - not really a good place to start, but hey, whatever works. edit: damn you, Bob! Great minds think alike, I guess.I always considered Drama to be Yes' "Hot Space" |
newcastle 86! 16483 05.12.2005 20:26 |
what a load of tosh!'doin all right' influenced by yes? my god i suppose 'wonderous stories' influenced 'i was born to love you' |
The Real Wizard 06.12.2005 11:38 |
groover wrote: Are you sure about that? Ive Seen All Good People was released commercially in 1971. Wasnt Doin' All Right written b4 then. I'm a huge fan of both. However, I have never thought the two bands were remotely similar.Hmm, you're right... it was already a Smile song. Hahaha, my bad! But let's not forget that Queen played many of their earliest concerts with Yes. Yes had put out "The Yes Album", and Queen were a nothing band. Yes' musicality surely influenced Queen in some way. |
Lester Burnham 06.12.2005 13:21 |
Surely, in the harmony department - Yes were early innovators in the prog rock harmonies, although most of Queen's harmonies did come from The Beatles. I think I just shot down my own theory in a matter of words. But John did say that one of his idols on bass is Chris Squire, and I can hardly blame him for that. |
newcastle 86! 16483 06.12.2005 18:22 |
true. cant beat the riff of 'lonely heart' its very queen. as is bostons 'more than a feeling' great rock tracks. |
Libor2 07.12.2005 05:27 |
groover wrote: I always considered Drama to be Yes' "Hot Space"Oh, I don't think so. Well, in the time it went out, the Yes fans wasn't too happy with it (remember it's the only one record without Jon Anderson, if I remember correctly). But as time goes on, Drama lost its bad reputation. I should say I like it a lot - especially Machine Messiah is great. I always count Drama record as the end of good stuff from 70's, before started Yes weaker era in 80's. Funny, but Tormato was my first record I bought too (but I'd heard Close To The Edge before from my friend). All in all, Yes are great, so it's worth to try listen. I recommend 'Close To The Edge' or 'Fragile' records (don't start with Topographic Oceans or Relayer). |
Lord Blackadder 07.12.2005 12:26 |
Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote:Maybe. But Brian is a far, far superior songwriter.jcrawford79 wrote: None called Somewhere in the Middle. I'm not sure if you are referencing the song or the album but if you're talking about the album, the song is called Bijou. If you're talking about the song, the flamenco part was played the guy from Yes (Steve Howe, I think is his name) and the rest was played by Brian."I think is his name" ... ? How about, the brilliant guitarist from Yes and Asia who, from a technical perspective, is a much better guitarist than Brian May ? Tastes are tastes, but Howe is by far a better guitarist. But May is still my favourite. |
The Real Wizard 07.12.2005 13:41 |
Lord Blackadder wrote:It's really hard to compare the two, because they write completely different kinds of music! Brian is a pop-oriented player, and Howe plays progressive rock often fused with classical. Could you see Brian writing the guitar bits in Yours Is No Disgrace and Close To The Edge? Likewise, could you see Steve Howe constructing the solo in Killer Queen? As for songwriting as a whole, Yes wrote much more as a closely-knit band unit than Queen did. Steve Howe worked with his bandmates to create the music together, and Queen's material was usually dominated by the one member who wrote the song. In that respect, and so many others, Yes and Queen were two completely different bands, and you just can't compare the two.Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote: Tastes are tastes, but Howe is by far a better guitarist. But May is still my favourite.Maybe. But Brian is a far, far superior songwriter. |
Bobby_brown 07.12.2005 15:09 |
Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote:Yes, that is true, but the fact they're in diferent styles of band you still can compare them, and Steve Howe is more refined technically than Brian.Lord Blackadder wrote:It's really hard to compare the two, because they write completely different kinds of music! Brian is a pop-oriented player, and Howe plays progressive rock often fused with classical. Could you see Brian writing the guitar bits in Yours Is No Disgrace and Close To The Edge? Likewise, could you see Steve Howe constructing the solo in Killer Queen? As for songwriting as a whole, Yes wrote much more as a closely-knit band unit than Queen did. Steve Howe worked with his bandmates to create the music together, and Queen's material was usually dominated by the one member who wrote the song. In that respect, and so many others, Yes and Queen were two completely different bands, and you just can't compare the two.Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote: Tastes are tastes, but Howe is by far a better guitarist. But May is still my favourite.Maybe. But Brian is a far, far superior songwriter. My opinion is based on what i've heard from their albums. It's possible that Brian has all the techniques that Steve has but he hasn't recorded them yet. I think Brian doesn't like to risk, and it's OK, but he should have more confidence in himself. As a songwriter, well thats another story!! TAke care |
Jan78 10.12.2005 10:53 |
And to clear things up finally: Have a look at the Innuendo album sleeve. You'll see "Additional wandering minstrel spanish guitar - somewhere in the middle - by Steve Howe", which means something like "additional guitar playing somewhere in the middle of the song Innuendo done by Steve Howe". Somewhere in the middle is not the title of anything. Jan |
M a t i a s M a y 11.12.2005 18:22 |
Steve Howe's a great guitarist, he plays better than Brian but I don't think he's actually a better guitarist than May. Brian is far more creative and original. And Yes is one of the best bands ever, however, Jon Anderson is an AWFUL singer. |
The Real Wizard 12.12.2005 22:52 |
MaTiaSMaY wrote: Steve Howe's a great guitarist, he plays better than Brian but I don't think he's actually a better guitarist than May. Brian is far more creative and original.That's debatable. Could you picture Brian writing Clap? Nobody played the acoustic guitar like Howe did in 1970. And Yes is one of the best bands ever, however, Jon Anderson is an AWFUL singer.Interesting... but you're one of the few who believes that. He has a very angelic voice, with an incredible range. I guess tastes are tastes, so to each their own! |
ariceffron 13.12.2005 17:27 |
I AM DISSAPOINTED IN YOU ALL. AS SELF RESPECTING QUEEN FANS YOU ALSO SHOULD LISTEN TO YES. 90125 IS ONE OF THE BEST ALBUMS OF THE 80S, ALTHOUGH STEVE HOWE, WHO PLAYS THAT GUITAR PART ON INNUENDO, HE WAS NOT IN THE BAND THEN. IF YOU WANT TO HEAR HIM AT HIS BEST YOU SHOULD GET "CLOSE TO THE EDGE" OR "RELAYER" OR "GOING FOR THE ONE". HIGHLY RECOMMENED IF YOU EVEN LIKE BRIAN MAY A LITTLE |
Lester Burnham 13.12.2005 17:29 |
Yikes, no need to yell. |
M a t i a s M a y 14.12.2005 17:47 |
I really doubt Brian could play The Clap, and that's what I said... Steve plays better than Brian, BUT Brian's far more creative and original in his stuff. And... Jon Anderson doesn't have a huge range, he just has a high voice... it's not a great range because his voice's already high. He is an awful singer. First of all, he sings SOOOOOO out of tune that makes me crazy... he lacks grace and his vocal technique is not that good... |
The Real Wizard 15.12.2005 00:42 |
MaTiaSMaY wrote: I really doubt Brian could play The Clap, and that's what I said... Steve plays better than Brian, BUT Brian's far more creative and original in his stuff.Clap is not creative? Steve Howe brought an entire genre of acoustic music to the mainstream. In 1970, hardly anybody in the mainstream played the acoustic guitar well, never mind like Steve Howe. Jon Anderson doesn't have a huge range, he just has a high voice... it's not a great range because his voice's already high. He is an awful singer. First of all, he sings SOOOOOO out of tune that makes me crazy... he lacks grace and his vocal technique is not that good...You must not have a clue about singing, honestly. I have heard dozens of Yes albums and concerts, and never once has Jon Anderson went out of tune. And he does have a huge vocal range - bigger than Freddie Mercury's. Every night he hits and sustains notes so cleanly and effortlessly (Going For The One) that Mercury could barely hit on his best day. Jon's lower range is as low as Freddie's as well (The Ancient). On the average Queen tour, Freddie's vocal range would be an octave and a half. Anderson destroys Mercury in that department. Whether or not you like his voice is up to your personal taste, but his singing abilities are nothing short of outstanding. |
M a t i a s M a y 18.12.2005 11:10 |
Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote:thanks for you comment, however, I must say that I have more than just a clue when I talk about singing, because that's what my dad has been teaching for more than 20 years.MaTiaSMaY wrote: I really doubt Brian could play The Clap, and that's what I said... Steve plays better than Brian, BUT Brian's far more creative and original in his stuff.Clap is not creative? Steve Howe brought an entire genre of acoustic music to the mainstream. In 1970, hardly anybody in the mainstream played the acoustic guitar well, never mind like Steve Howe.Jon Anderson doesn't have a huge range, he just has a high voice... it's not a great range because his voice's already high. He is an awful singer. First of all, he sings SOOOOOO out of tune that makes me crazy... he lacks grace and his vocal technique is not that good...You must not have a clue about singing, honestly. I have heard dozens of Yes albums and concerts, and never once has Jon Anderson went out of tune. And he does have a huge vocal range - bigger than Freddie Mercury's. Every night he hits and sustains notes so cleanly and effortlessly (Going For The One) that Mercury could barely hit on his best day. Jon's lower range is as low as Freddie's as well (The Ancient). On the average Queen tour, Freddie's vocal range would be an octave and a half. Anderson destroys Mercury in that department. Whether or not you like his voice is up to your personal taste, but his singing abilities are nothing short of outstanding. And if your ears can't listen to Jon Anderson going out of tune, it's not my problem, because I can. And vocal range is not something important in singing, the important is to sing well, no matter your range... I don't know who taught you about singing but he's got no idea about it. And you also compare Anderson with Mercury... you should burn in hell for the rest of your life hahahahahahaha!!! You could never compare Freddie with Jon. Freddie's one of the greatest singers of all time and Jon can't even sing... The Clap is very creative, and it's hard to be creative. But Brian plays in a unique way and with a unique way of playing the guitar... he's (MORE) creative and original than Howe. And that makes him a better guitarist. Maybe you should say that anybody who plays fast is better than somebody that's not fast. You can't measure a guitarist's capacity that way ("HOWE PLAYS HARD THINGS SO HE MUST BE BETTER THAN BRIAN"). |
The Real Wizard 20.12.2005 13:02 |
MaTiaSMaY wrote: And vocal range is not something important in singing, the important is to sing well, no matter your range... I don't know who taught you about singing but he's got no idea about it.I never once said range was the only thing that mattered, nor did I say that Anderson is the better singer. Maybe you should say that anybody who plays fast is better than somebody that's not fast.And I also never once said that playing faster is better. I was merely comparing styles. If your way of debating is taking people out of context and putting words in their mouth, then you have a long way to go, my friend. |
M a t i a s M a y 21.12.2005 09:00 |
You should read twice, I never said that you said that range was the only important thing. I said that range is NOT important, there are other things that makes a good singer. But what you tried to say was that Anderson was a better singer than Mercury. I can only laugh and laugh. hahaha Cheers! |
The Real Wizard 22.12.2005 01:41 |
MaTiaSMaY wrote: But what you tried to say was that Anderson was a better singer than Mercury.No, I said Anderson's *range* was better. I fully realize there are more aspects to a voice than its range, and thus this one thing does not make Anderson the better singer. Mercury was an overall much better singer than Anderson. Funny how you make that conclusion about my tastes based on one comment about another singer's vocal range. Again, stop putting words into other people's mouths. By doing that, you show pitiful debating skills. |
M a t i a s M a y 23.12.2005 01:24 |
And you show pitiful musical knowledgements, dear A vocal range is not "better" than another range. Jon Anderson's range is HIGH, his voice is just high and his mids and bass are very bad. You should read a little about singing because you are showing that you don't know nothing at all about it. Cheers |
Libor2 23.12.2005 06:14 |
MaTiaSMaY wrote: And you show pitiful musical knowledgements, dear A vocal range is not "better" than another range. Jon Anderson's range is HIGH, his voice is just high and his mids and bass are very bad. You should read a little about singing because you are showing that you don't know nothing at all about it. CheersHmm, I don't think it's necessary to be so harsh here. You talk about vocal differencies and not about life and dead, right? BTW, I don't think you are 100% correct. You try to compare two very different vocalists from your point of view. You don't like Anderson voice and from all, what you wrote, it's evident. But there are people who like it, and part of them will always take Anderson's voice over Freddie. Technically speaking, Freddie voice quality is great, he is one of the greatest voices of rock. But there are a lot of people (Jon Anderson, Gabriel, Ian Anderson (JT),...), who voices aren't so perfect, but nevertheless their contribution to the music is the same quality, as Freddie's was. Simply put, there are a lot of music tastes, and each of us could have different views to this. BTW, I like Anderson's singing, and I must say, when I was on Yes concert live (a few years ago), he was absolutely perfect and precise (I sing in a band too, so I hope I can hear it). Have a fine day, and better mood in Christmas time. Cheers. Libor |
M a t i a s M a y 24.12.2005 15:27 |
You're right, I'm taking this "too seriously", but it's just the way I am, don't worry about it xD Alright, now going back to the topic... My dad the singing teacher and I've been listening to The Ancient and Going For The One as you said they were the prove that Jon Anderson has a bigger range than Freddie. In The Ancient (16 minutes of its 18 are SHIT) Jon Anderson barely hits a B 1, actually he doesn't hits that note... he's "blowing" the note, because he doesn't really hits that low... I guess a Db 2 may be his lower note. Meanwhile Freddie Mercury hits a F 1, 6 semitones lower than Anderson. So it's impossible that Jon's lower range is the same as Freddie's. Alright, in Going For The One, Anderson hits a E4, with a little bit of Falsetto on it... Freddie also hits an E4 in The Show Must Go On. So their high ranges are the same. Anyway, it's obvious that Jon can hit higher notes than that, but nothing out of the blue. Anderson's vocal range and Freddie's vocal range are completely different because their voices are as oppossite as possible. So it's not about "ANDERSON HAS A BETTER RANGE THAN FREDDIE" because we're not talking about ranges from a "common" vocal range in every man, we're talking about different ranges of different voices. So that's the main reason why Jon hasn't got a "better" range than Freddie. And Freddie has a bigger range than Jon. ;-) So better luck next time. Oh, I almost forgot. This is not about tastes, this is about musical theory; when someone goes out of tune, IT IS OUT OF TUNE, it's not up to tastes. a merry merry christmas cheers! |
Mr. Barcelona 25.12.2005 02:54 |
ok, this is getting interesting. Steve howe vs. brian may?...that's a very close one, i'm not a huge yes fan, but i like em. I'm sorry, but you could go either way with those two guys. Obviously i like brian better, but to be honest i think steve howe might be a little better. Freddie vs. Anderson?...you must be kidding! please tell me your kidding?...freddie wipes the floor with that guy, I don't care how high someone sings, It means very little. If singing high was so important than geddy lee would be the best singer ever, but we all know he can't sing to save his life. freddie was light years better than jon anderson. |
The Real Wizard 25.12.2005 21:42 |
MaTiaSMaY wrote: And you show pitiful musical knowledgements, dear A vocal range is not "better" than another range.I meant to say "bigger". Excuse me for my grammatical slip-up. My dad the singing teacher and I've been listening to The Ancient and Going For The One as you said they were the prove that Jon Anderson has a bigger range than Freddie.Just because your father is a singing teacher doesn't mean he is infallible. Not that implying that your father is a poor teacher, but there are a lot of poor teachers out there, and many of them are vocal teachers. If your argument is truly compelling, you shouldn't need to point out the source of your information. The information should speak for itself. In The Ancient (16 minutes of its 18 are SHIT) Jon Anderson barely hits a B 1, actually he doesn't hits that note... he's "blowing" the note, because he doesn't really hits that low... I guess a Db 2 may be his lower note. Meanwhile Freddie Mercury hits a F 1, 6 semitones lower than Anderson.They are shit - in your opinion. The lowest note he sings in the song is a G#1, and he does hit it. There is no debate. I have perfect pitch. Alright, in Going For The One, Anderson hits a E4, with a little bit of Falsetto on it... Freddie also hits an E4 in The Show Must Go On.But Jon can hit those notes EVERY night. Freddie hit them three times in his entire life!! On most of Queen's tours, Freddie's vocal range wasn't much more than an octave. I don't think a vocal range should be defined by notes that are seldom hit. I view the vocal range as something that is used on a consistent basis. I hit an E4 once myself, and I can go lower than an F1 regularly. Does that make my range better than Freddie's? Absolutely not, because I can't hit the higher notes consistently. Anderson's vocal range and Freddie's vocal range are completely different because their voices are as oppossite as possible. So it's not about "ANDERSON HAS A BETTER RANGE THAN FREDDIE" because we're not talking about ranges from a "common" vocal range in every man, we're talking about different ranges of different voices. So that's the main reason why Jon hasn't got a "better" range than Freddie. And Freddie has a bigger range than Jon. ;-) So better luck next time.You have a very demeaning and arrogant way of communicating, and so I won't spend any more time discussing this with you. Many times in this discussion, you used your personal distaste for Anderson's voice and Yes' music as grounds for your arguments. While I recognize that Freddie has the overall better voice than Jon, the way you presented your arguments throughout was often very poor. Anyone who reads this can decide which of us is the better communicator, and didn't need to stoop to certain lows to get their point across. Never once did I say Jon was a better singer, and never once did I use any personal opinions to diminish your arguments. But again, you're 16, and for someone of your age, I guess you're showing some potential. Good luck to you. |
Mr. Barcelona 26.12.2005 00:52 |
If you agree freddie has the overall better voice than what is the base of your argument?...the both of you said freddie was the better overall singer, and i agree 100%. I don't think it's very close. |
The Real Wizard 27.12.2005 15:52 |
Mr. Barcelona wrote: If you agree freddie has the overall better voice than what is the base of your argument?...Just because Freddie's voice is the overall better one doesn't make Jon's voice substandard in every way. I maintain that Jon's higher range is much better than Freddie's, because he could hit notes on consistent basis that Freddie could rarely hit. |
Libor2 28.12.2005 09:31 |
Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote: Just because Freddie's voice is the overall better one doesn't make Jon's voice substandard in every way. I maintain that Jon's higher range is much better than Freddie's, because he could hit notes on consistent basis that Freddie could rarely hit.Yes, true. There's no need to lower other (great) musicians just because Freddie voice was/is one of the best around. On the other side, I always considered Freddie live singing much weaker than studio one. Comparing live gigs, there is situation much more balanded for some vocalists. Anderson counting in. |
The Real Wizard 28.12.2005 13:04 |
Libor2 wrote: I always considered Freddie live singing much weaker than studio one.Generally, yes... but there were some incredible concerts from him: May 1977 December 1979 July 1980 Europe 1982 And a few single shows: Copenhagen 4-13-78, Sao Paulo 3-20-81, Brussels 8-24-84, Tokyo 5-9-85, Stockholm 6-7-86, Leiden 6-11-86, and surely others. |
Libor2 01.01.2006 15:43 |
Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote: Generally, yes... but there were some incredible concerts from him: May 1977 December 1979 July 1980 Europe 1982 And a few single shows: Copenhagen 4-13-78, Sao Paulo 3-20-81, Brussels 8-24-84, Tokyo 5-9-85, Stockholm 6-7-86, Leiden 6-11-86, and surely others.Yes, of course, I didn't try to lower Freddie's singing. I wanted to point out, that the main power of Queen was studio work (as opposite to bands as Deep Purple or Led Zeppelin ...). And although Freddie was also great live, it's easier to compare him on 'live singing field'. Plus, I don't like generally opinions, about that somebody is horrible, bad, etc. (musician, vocalist...) Usually it's not the truth. If I'd speak with non Queen fan, I always be Freddie advocate until my last breath :-). |
Mr. Barcelona 02.01.2006 01:27 |
I actually sometimes prefer his live voice, And queen were truly at their best live. So, I guess I disagree with your overall opinions. |