| SomebodyWhoLoves 28.08.2005 18:22 |
For each member of Queen, rate them from 1-10 for attraction, and whether you would have slept with them. |
| Lymi 28.08.2005 18:25 |
10/10- Freddie Mercury (if i could give him 100 i would) 8/10- Brian May 7/10- Roger Taylor 5/10- John Deacon |
| All I Hear Is Radio Gaga 28.08.2005 20:39 |
Freddie: 8 Brian: 7 Roger: 10 John: 6 |
| mercuryqueen 28.08.2005 20:54 |
Ladies only? This is a Queen site dude... Here are my ratings Freddie: 10/10-Pure sex appeal he was Brian: 10/10... he knows how to work with his guitars and that is a turn on Roger: 10/10-He was actually the best looking of the group John: 9/10-I had to take away a point just because he hasnt been seen lately so i cant really judge All in All, Queen is the hottest Rock and Roll band in history |
| Lymi 28.08.2005 21:10 |
Honestly, Freddie was the best looking of the band, look at his moustache, his chest, his body, and most of all, his eyes!!! Big hugs |
| *3*Playful as a pussycat 28.08.2005 21:17 |
10/10 Freddie 10/10 Brian 10/10 Roger 10/10 John ...give me a break... |
| Sharron .G 28.08.2005 23:00 |
Lets get real. Take away the fame, and fortune. I would say that Roger is the only member of Queen that anyone here would fuck without a gun to their head. If you saw someone who looked like Freddie coming at you shopping mall, you'd call for security, or make fun of his buck teeth with your girlfriends. Brian.... oh baby!! 6 foot 2, 145 lbs... with afro, height go's to 7 foot 1.... scrawny arms, and legs, inverted chest with 3 hairs on it... who besides me is ready to cum? Really, John is probably more normal looking than Freddie or Brian...but he looks like a accountant. Roger in his prime was a good looking guy... kind of "pretty" but cute. |
| Captain Fap 29.08.2005 00:01 |
Honestly? Well, here it goes; Freddie: 6 . . . possibly Brian: 7 . . . maybe Roger: 10 . . . yes John: 5 . . . depends I think I have a weakness for pretty blonde males . . . or not. I don't know honestly. |
| written_in_the_stars 29.08.2005 01:30 |
This is my opinion: Roger: 10/10 Freddie: 9/10 Brian: 7/10 John: 5/10 Roger corresponds the most to the type of boys I'm attracted to. I think he looked very sexy and hot. Freddie was sure attractive, but in another way. It was his charisma, his talent, his human and vulnerable part of him that made him beautiful. To me he was more beautiful than just hot. I think Brian sometimes could be very sexy, in his way to play guitar and to sing his songs. I know what some people say about Brian's voice, but I personally love it. John was the shy one and even if I don't personally find him so attractive, I have to admit that shy boys can sometimes be very cute and attractive. |
| deleted user 29.08.2005 05:37 |
Freddie: 10/10 (he's got it all) Brian: 10/10 (so does he) Roger: 10/10 (yeah) John: 8/10 (sorry) They all pretty much got it all! |
| Sharon G. 29.08.2005 07:01 |
same as Lymi. |
| brENsKi 29.08.2005 08:07 |
mercuryqueen wrote: Ladies only? This is a Queen site dude... Here are my ratings Freddie: 10/10-Pure sex appeal he was John: 9/10-I had to take away a point just because he hasnt been seen lately so i cant really judgeFreddie's nto been seen lately either - but you still gave him 10 |
| MelinaMercury 29.08.2005 13:05 |
oh I was that guy that shared Kanazawa and Liverpool 73 in a week time and made sure they are not rare anymore Good For you!! haha |
| goliath 29.08.2005 13:32 |
Freddie 10/ 10 Roger 9/10 Brian 6/10 John 2/10 I would only have slept with Roger to get to Freddie, so Freddie would be the only one that I would have slept with and liked it. |
| Save me 29.08.2005 14:25 |
ok, here's my answers! Brian: 10/10, and then some, that man is sex on legs! Freddie 9/10 he was pretty hot in the early days Roger 9/10, very sexy in the early queen days, and also towards the early eighties John: 5/10, not seeing the attraction myself, sorry deaconites! :) |
| blerp 29.08.2005 14:30 |
well...i'm also telling you lot which decade i loved them the most. 10/10 - Freddie. *of course i'd sleep with him. he's gorgeous. if he ever hit on me in any way, i'd have a spaz. (through the 1970s are my favourite of him. long hair is my thing.) 10/10 - Brian. *sexy hair. nice body. and he's bloody tall. the guitar tops it all off. cor, it's all a go! (1970s-1980s) 10/10 - Roger. *i go mad for the wild drummer with bleached hair. he's prettier than me for god's sake! (the 70s definitely!) 10/10 - John. *yes, i think he is extremely attractive. i like quiet types too. no questions about it. (70s, early 80s.) fuck them, darling, if they just don't get it. -Freddie Mercury |
| kerfuffle87 29.08.2005 17:16 |
hummm if i'm being honest, Roger would be the only one i'd take home with me! However, i do find ambition incredibly sexy, so on that basis, plus general attractiveness: Freddie: 10/10 Brian: 9/10 Roger: 10/10 John: (sorry) 7/10 |
| doremi 29.08.2005 17:24 |
SomebodyWhoLoves wrote: For each member of Queen, rate them from 1-10 for attraction, and whether you would have slept with them.Freddie past 10--- He's an original, a 15! YES! I would have slept with him (if he was straight or bi, and I would have also been literally happy to actually sleep with him, seeing as how he was gay. That's ok by me.) Roger-9 Yes! Brian-5 Maybe.... John-Sorry baby but a 2 and no. |
| Lymi 29.08.2005 17:33 |
Sharon G. wrote: same as Lymi.I'm glad someone agrees with me, you can't imagine the way Freddie turns me on when i see him on Live Aid. I have to say Freddie looks great and hot in all the concerts. But i don't know what happens with Live Aid, when he sang Radio Gaga, my hearts starts to beat, whoooooooooooooooooooooooooo so hot!!!! well my signature explain it all. Cheers!! |
| Winter Land Man 29.08.2005 17:34 |
|
| Winter Land Man 29.08.2005 17:36 |
goliath wrote: Freddie 10/ 10 Roger 9/10 Brian 6/10 John 2/10 I would only have slept with Roger to get to Freddie, so Freddie would be the only one that I would have slept with and liked it.Be sure he has protection. |
| Winter Land Man 29.08.2005 17:38 |
Arlene R. Weiss wrote:Judgemental bitch. All the other ones are players, and Freddie had AIDS.SomebodyWhoLoves wrote: For each member of Queen, rate them from 1-10 for attraction, and whether you would have slept with them.Freddie past 10--- He's an original, a 15! YES! I would have slept with him (if he was straight or bi, and I would have also been literally happy to actually sleep with him, seeing as how he was gay. That's ok by me.) Roger-9 Yes! Brian-5 Maybe.... John-Sorry baby but a 2 and no. |
| chslchs 29.08.2005 17:49 |
Freddie/10....110% Roger/10......110% Brian/10......110%(even though he looks like he could be my brother....no kidding. I wish i had a pic....lol) John/9....99%(that's for the short shorts.....haha!) |
| Missy May 02.09.2005 13:08 |
Sharron .G wrote: I would say that Roger is the only member of Queen that anyone here would fuck without a gun to their head.* Brian.... oh baby!! 6 foot 2, 145 lbs... with afro, height go's to 7 foot 1.... scrawny arms, and legs, inverted chest with 3 hairs on it... who besides me is ready to cum?** Really, John is probably more normal looking than Freddie or Brian***...but he looks like a accountant.*Not true!!! ***ME!!!Brian is well fit! I love his hair. ***but who likes normal. Why would you want to be with someone "normal"??? Brian 10/10 He's got with his hands and he was always so sweet with dreamy eyes Freddie 10/10 He had an amazing personality and his eyes held the key to a million dreams and ambitions Roger 9/10 He was to much of a wham bam thank you mam man John 5/10 He was kinda goofy. |
| sheerheartattack1980 02.09.2005 22:00 |
Brian-10 (yes, i would have slept with him, especially in the early days, i think he was so cute!) Freddie-9 (yes, if he would have dug chicks) Roger-9 (yes, those nice eyes and cute little grin) John-1 (no, i couldn't possibly, i love him because he was an important part of Queen as well but there is a strange resemblence of Freddie Kruger to me. I still love him though.) |