| debmercury 17.02.2005 21:24 |
is he still alive and well? |
| deleted user 17.02.2005 21:46 |
Yes he is. He was interviewed on 'Freddie's Loves' a while back. |
| debmercury 18.02.2005 00:19 |
thank you for feedback, didnt know if he was still around because of his illness. glad to hear he is well. did this programme appear on uk tv? we didnt get it in oz. |
| debmercury 18.02.2005 05:36 |
thanks dennis tm! would love to know all the goss I read Jims book when it was first published and felt so sorry for him, as he had been close to freddie and he didnt get the credit he deserves (or anything else for that matter!) thanks for feedback, much appreciated debmercury |
| Aisha Sweetness 18.02.2005 05:47 |
That's weird i was going to post the very same topic i even put his name into a search engine to see if anything came up about him recently but found nothing much i wonder if he is living in ireland in the house him and freddie bought together? I agree that he seemed like a nice guy who loved freddie through everything, i hope he is well. xx |
| debmercury 18.02.2005 05:54 |
g'day aisha, good to talk to you! wouldnt it be great if we could find out where he is, at least then we can tell him that he's not forgotten. we'll have to do a bit of investigating together, Jim Hutton Appreciation Society! hahaha look forward to your comments debmercury |
| FriedChicken 18.02.2005 06:13 |
"as he had been close to freddie and he didnt get the credit he deserves (or anything else for that matter!) " *cough* Jim made thousands of pounds money by telling Freddie's intimate details and secrets in his book. No wonder a lot of fans don't like him I'm sure most fans don't want to know that Freddie choked in a piece of mango, or broke a bone after Jim put him back in bed after taking him to the bathroom. And certainly not that his last words were 'pee pee' |
| debmercury 18.02.2005 07:06 |
fried chicken: Your intitled to your opinion, I respect that., but I dont hold that against Jim as there were a lot of bad rumours circulating about Freddie and it was good to read about personal stuff., Jim never dissed Freddie, he just told the truth, Gud on 'im! whatever money he made wouldve gone towards his medical bills I'm sure of that. Thank you for you correspondence |
| queen-mad 4729 18.02.2005 07:25 |
Jim parties on down at the queen convention every year. He's a damned good dancer too hehe |
| debmercury 18.02.2005 07:31 |
queenmad! thank goodness for "real" people in this world., we only live once hey? Maybe Jim should enter dancing comps! wonder if his "ears are burning"..... wasnt it jim that made up the lyrics "fried chicken" cough um........ thanks for feedback my friend |
| Ander Vørschört 06.03.2005 16:02 |
Jim is infected? Wow, didn't know that one! |
| Brianmay1975 06.03.2005 17:48 |
whowantstoliveforever88 wrote: Jim is infected? Wow, didn't know that one!Err... he lived with an HIV-positive lover. What do you think? That's how AIDS gets spread... |
| mercuryqueen 06.03.2005 18:27 |
Living with a HIV positive lover doesnt mean you will get it... sure doesnt help, though. |
| flash00. 06.03.2005 20:36 |
FriedChicken<br><font size=1>The Almighty</font> wrote: "as he had been close to freddie and he didnt get the credit he deserves (or anything else for that matter!) " *cough* Jim made thousands of pounds money by telling Freddie's intimate details and secrets in his book. No wonder a lot of fans don't like him I'm sure most fans don't want to know that Freddie choked in a piece of mango, or broke a bone after Jim put him back in bed after taking him to the bathroom. And certainly not that his last words were 'pee pee'i think freddie would be raging that jim spoke of those last private words "pee pee" we all know how private freddie was i do understand jim has to make cash for his own health reasons but! he went too far with a lot of personal things in that book, dont get me wrong its a very good read, |
| Ander Vørschört 06.03.2005 21:00 |
flash00. wrote:That's just plain disrespectful!FriedChicken<br><font size=1>The Almighty</font> wrote: "as he had been close to freddie and he didnt get the credit he deserves (or anything else for that matter!) " *cough* Jim made thousands of pounds money by telling Freddie's intimate details and secrets in his book. No wonder a lot of fans don't like him I'm sure most fans don't want to know that Freddie choked in a piece of mango, or broke a bone after Jim put him back in bed after taking him to the bathroom. And certainly not that his last words were 'pee pee'i think freddie would be raging that jim spoke of those last private words "pee pee" we all know how private freddie was i do understand jim has to make cash for his own health reasons but! he went too far with a lot of personal things in that book, dont get me wrong its a very good read, |
| doremi 09.03.2005 16:02 |
As they say, a true friend and lover....Never..kisses, and then tells, especially for money. And people still have the gall to ask or wonder or analyze why Freddie kept his personal life--(God Forbid!), personal--and --private--. Geez, Princess Diana, lovely woman of grace that she was, also always asked fans, press, the world, to please respect her privacy and her private life. Don't get me wrong, when any person chooses to enter public life as an entertainer, politician, etc., well they have to understand and know that it's part of the deal that the public will be fascinated with and want to know about them.-- --And some of that--IS--ok and helps make that public person famous, promote their work as an entertainer,artist, politician, and they can even use their celebrity--as leverage for good causes,- --as Princess Diana did, as U2's Bono and Bob Geldof do.....and YES--- ---------as Brian and Roger do campaigning with Nelson Mandela to Internationally raise AIDS awareness and help to find a cure.----------- --But, the public has to know--when and on what items to draw the line and give a public person some peace, quiet, privacy, and respect them with dignity.-- --Whatever during his life on this earth, Freddie chose to keep as some precious yet private part of his life-- --whether it be the good which I know in my heart there most definitely was,..-- --or the bad or rather upsetting things as when he got AIDS, or simply coughing on a mango, geez, people (Jim included) should respect Freddie's memory and show some class and levave sone things unsaid and private showing respect. Even in Heaven....a soul needs to have peace. |
| debmercury 09.03.2005 16:58 |
sorry to say this guys... but its obvious that you have all read his book! talk about hypocracy at its best! can you all honestly say that not once have you read any material on any stars? I read Jims book because it was about his life with Freddie, I am a Queen fan, have been since Sheer Heart Attack days my home is proof of this, I love Freddie Mercury always have.. always will... I am not apologising, far from it., I found it an interesting read... along with everyone here that has read it too! I suggest you all take a good long look at yourselves before you criticize Jim, as we have all guilty of reading material like this at some time of our lives! I asked one question on this page.... Wheres Jim Hutton? full stop... I got my response, thank you... youve all seemed to have turned this into a debate .... and I thought Queen fans where nice people! |
| doremi 09.03.2005 17:24 |
--I walk the walk, I don't just talk. I have NOT read Jim's book because I know it is a tell all. --It also ticked me off when Princess Diana's Butler wrote and published a tell all--which I won't read.-- --And get this Major tick off of mine...when John F. Kennedy Jr. died in the airplane crash, the Managing Editor of "George Magazine" that J.F.Kennedy, Jr. had been the Editor In Chief of,- --Well this Managing Editor who was--also supposed to be a Good and Trusted confident/Friend of J.F. Kennedy, Jr.-- --fired staff members of "George Magazine" for trying to peddle tell alls to book publishers and the press.-- --Then,--how's this for gall or rather B**lls--this same Managing Editor wrote and published a -----scathing--tell all of J.F. Kennedy Jr. that J.F. Kennedy Jr.'s family, the Kennedy's tried to block.-- --And--NO---I never read it, I don't care to and I did see even the "evil" press here in the United States finally get some standards and class and sense of respect and they refused to cover the book and painted the Managing Editor/Author as the money hungry backstabbing jerk he was.- |
| debmercury 09.03.2005 17:51 |
Arlene, I am not fighting with you...I am just pointing out that we are all guilty of reading material that is published on our favourite bands.. all authors make money. and where does it go? straight into their pockets.. you yourself have posted a topic on this forum regarding books ... you've ordered Queen -The early Years (Mark Hodkinson).. regardless of what they write, we all want to know as much as we can about Queen (this forum is proof of that) we all have our own stories to tell, when we saw them..... what Freddie looked like before he died.... etc etc.. we all know what Freddie went through for goodness sake, he was dying, it was very sad. I just dont like to be 'shouted down' for something we all do, but are too chicken to admit it. |
| doremi 09.03.2005 18:09 |
I didn't mean to sound like I was shouting. Sorry, really.... I just want to make clear that while everyone out there is entitled and certainly can make up their own decision to read whatever press or books are out there on Queen or any public figure (s)-- --that I personally do not care to ever read scandal or tell alls and I dont, so I don't want to be lumped into the hypocrite category. That's all.-- --And with certain public figures, who suffer through such tragedy as Freddie, Princess Diana, or J.F. Kennedy Jr. did, I already cried when they died, and I still cry when I think about what they must have gone through, and I cry about what the world has lost, and for their friends and families.-- --I want to know about the "artist" and what informed their work, career, ambition. Their personna, personality.-- --Interviews with them and their friends, families, collegues, and yes lovers (if respectful) that are informative, insightful, humorous, and leave indelible, meaningful, and insightful memories and a unique well researched scholarly and entertaining understanding of the said public figure and why we love their work, art, talent, etc.-- --And why we continue to cherish, honor, love, and remember these people. That's what I want to read about.-- |
| debmercury 09.03.2005 18:29 |
Arlene, I respect your opinions., but I found Jims book quite informative., it was written out of love for Freddie,(yeah regardless of what people think). Freddies spirit will be looking down on Jim and all the others his shared his life with, I'm sure he holds no grudges to the people and fans that have shown an interest in his life ... As regard to Princess Diana., I feel sorry for her family.. of course I do., I have a child myself, I would hate to leave this world the way she did, it was unfortunate I know, but I always wear my seatbelt in a car, because I know I have a daughter at home waiting for my safe return.. I'm NOT dissing her, she was a great person a wonderful human being., so was John Kennedy (they will be sadly missed)but you have to look at the circumstances here.. they died through negligence., I know the press hound them,. but they chose to be in the spotlight and I personally hate the paparatzi for what they can do. I suggest you read Jim's book, you will find out for yourself., and if you chose not to... thats okay. |
| ANAGRAMER 13.03.2005 15:35 |
This topic has got a bit off the point don't you think? Does it matter where Jim Hutton is? As far as the book is concerned, people buy these things and read them because they are interested in the subject matter - the standard of the writing is not an issue for the buyer who acts in good faith. As it turns out, if you really want to find out more about Freddie, listern to the records - these books are subjective and, in the case of Jim Hutton, an act of revenge on some of Freddie's closest friends. No real insight into the man, this book is simply a catalogue of who bought what for whom and sycophantic nonsense. |
| john bodega 14.03.2005 11:21 |
Hey - did you say 'Freddie's spirit?'. Ooooh, I think that means.... ... ....... GHOST. His ghost will come to strike you down in the night. Another one bites the dust! I can hear the tapping of GHOSTY FEET OUTSIDE THE DOOR. OOOOOOOHHHHHHHHH. Here comes the ghost! |
| doremi 14.03.2005 12:42 |
ANAGRAMER wrote: This topic has got a bit off the point don't you think? Does it matter where Jim Hutton is? As far as the book is concerned, people buy these things and read them because they are interested in the subject matter - the standard of the writing is not an issue for the buyer who acts in good faith. As it turns out, if you really want to find out more about Freddie, listern to the records - these books are subjective and, in the case of Jim Hutton, an act of revenge on some of Freddie's closest friends. No real insight into the man, this book is simply a catalogue of who bought what for whom and sycophantic nonsense.Yoy say this book (which I still don't want to read) is an act of revenge by Jim on some of Freddie's closest friends. Do you mean that in the right way...as in justice on those who betrayed Freddie..or in the wrong way as in being a bad person and in Jim betraying Freddie and Jim betraying Freddie's friends. I'm interested in this. Please tell me more. |
| doremi 14.03.2005 12:58 |
woops...I missed the word syncophantic...so there's my answer. So I guess Jim turned out to betray Freddie after all then....here in the USA they have a saying....It's all about the Benjamins(money)! Was he that ignorant to Freddie's friends in the book. See, that's why I don't want to read it. Pocket the cash on the grave of your former lover...sounds like a peach of a guy! |
| debmercury 14.03.2005 15:10 |
will you all just 'get over it' please., you are all trying to ourto each other here., I'm not interested anymore.... this topic is officialy gone... I asked one question, I got my response... you are all trying to 'outdo' each other., trying to be a better/bigger fan of Queen does not cut it with me... just let i go............ Arlene, no disrespect mate., but get a life! |
| debmercury 14.03.2005 15:12 |
will you all just 'get over it' please., you are all trying to outdo each other here., I'm not interested anymore.... this topic is officialy gone... I asked one question, I got my response... you are all trying to 'outdo' each other., trying to be a better/bigger fan of Queen does not cut it with me... just let it go............ Arlene, no disrespect mate., but get a life! |
| ANAGRAMER 14.03.2005 15:29 |
arlene wrote: woops...I missed the word syncophantic...so there's my answer. So I guess Jim turned out to betray Freddie after all then....here in the USA they have a saying....It's all about the Benjamins(money)! Was he that ignorant to Freddie's friends in the book. See, that's why I don't want to read it. Pocket the cash on the grave of your former lover...sounds like a peach of a guy!The guy obviously had a great deal of affection for Freddie but the glamour and the money also had a big impact on Jim Hutton's opinions. He claims never to have heard of Freddie Mercury until they met in 1984 but was a big fan of David Bowie - doesn't make sense. He also claims that Freddie left his house to Hutton in an oral agreement - this left a certain amount of bitterness in Jim Hutton since Freddie left nearly all his possessions to Mary Austin - whom he vilifies throughout the tome... |
| geeksandgeeks 14.03.2005 20:22 |
He's been holding on for quite a while. 'Tis admirable. |
| MelinaMercury 24.05.2005 19:51 |
Very good read... COO EEEE!!! |
| Fairy 27.05.2005 15:09 |
Guys, unless you were part of Freddie's life on earth you can't judge who was his real friend and who was not. Fairy |
| flash00. 27.05.2005 20:23 |
Fairy wrote: Guys, unless you were part of Freddie's life on earth you can't judge who was his real friend and who was not. Fairydont worry babe i'm rite behind ya LOL :))) |
| Fairy 28.05.2005 10:31 |
flash00. wrote:dont worry babe i'm rite behind ya LOL :))) Oh, my hero! So reassuring...It can get dangerous in this wilderness! Ciao Flash!!! Fairy |
| slightly_mad 29.12.2006 04:07 |
Mary was a greedy person, at least thats what she turned into after Freddie died... And believe me, Jim's a good honest guy. You can trust my words. :* |
| rocks. 29.12.2006 13:24 |
slightly_mad wrote: Mary was a greedy person, at least thats what she turned into after Freddie died... And believe me, Jim's a good honest guy. You can trust my words. :*Um...why was mary a greedy person?? *is lost* |
| Crezchi 29.12.2006 22:03 |
slightly_mad wrote: Mary was a greedy person, at least thats what she turned into after Freddie died... And believe me, Jim's a good honest guy. You can trust my words. :*If you are serious, you are an ignorant twit! |
| john bodega 29.12.2006 22:22 |
Jim Hutton sleeps in a coffin. |
| deleted user 29.12.2006 22:42 |
These threads keep spawning... My word... Was it bad ideas and keyboard mating season again ? Or are they always in heat ? Methinks the latter... |
| Bohemian Rhapsodies 30.12.2006 00:21 |
I agree that it was odd that he knew of David Bowie but not Freddie Mercury. That never made any sense to me. I also think that he wanted to paint a vile picture of Mary Austin. As far as leaving the house to him, I think all was said and done in the will. If Freddie had wanted to leave it to him, he certainly could have done so. Instead he left him 500,000 pounds, the same amount he left to Peter Freestone and Joe Fannelli. |
| debmercury 30.12.2006 10:20 |
I havent visited this site since I brought up this topic many moons ago (seems like it anyway lol) ..... it's been a long time to say the least., thought it was dead and buried...how wrong I was! afterall the abuse I got ... I chose to leave this site .... I thought Queen fans would be 'different' .... sadly, how wrong I was. thing is ...... Ive been a Queen fan since I first heard them., way back in the mid-70's .. all I asked was a simple question "wheres Jim Hutton" turned out to be a circus really .... I never once in my wildest dreams thought for one moment that a few of you would discriminate me for putting up such a topic .... seems I touched a few nerve ends ....... lol I am still interested to know where Jim is ... I'm noisy, cant help it ...... thing is .. I read the book, several times over .... I saw one reply (sorry didnt have the time to read your name)......... Jim had never heard of Freddie but knew of David Bowie .... strange??? nah thats being honest in my books ...... anyone here heard of Ali Campbell? no??? he is the lead singer of UB40 .... I'm a big fan of theirs .... I knew that..... but have you guys ever heard of Ali Campbell? depends on what music you listen to hey? do not judge Jim because he'd never heard of Freddie ..... not many people did before his death ..... Queen arent the only famous band you know..... as for Mary getting the majority of Mr Mercurys estate ....... well, she did kick the guys out of Freddies property after his death, even though he clearly stated he wanted them to stay until they wanted to leave themselves...... yep...... in my books that damn selfish! I happen to like Jim .. in fact, if I ever had the priviledge to meet him face to face, I'd buy him a beer or 2 ..... afterall, Freddie loved him ...... and he loved Freddie as much as we all do ....and Jim, if you read this ..... all the very best to you my friend . and If I had the opportunity to 'walk in your shoes" I wouldve written a book too ...... |
| Bohemian Rhapsodies 30.12.2006 12:08 |
Freddie Mercury did not only become famous after his death. His name is synonymous with Queen and they were very popular in the U.S. during the 70's and early 80's. I know that because I was one of their fans back then. They filled enormous venues, selling out Madison Square Garden 4 nights in a row. They lost popularity with many fans here in the early 80's (not me though) because of the direction their music had taken. However, they remained enormously popular throughout Europe, rivaling the popularity of the Beatles. I am also a huge David Bowie fan, following him since 1971, but Queen got more airplay until later years. As far as Jim Hutton's book goes, I read it twice and enjoyed it, but I do not get the impression from the book that he knew Freddie all that well. The book talks about where they went and what was bought for who, but it has no real substance as far as getting to know Freddie. I personally have no problem with Jim Hutton and I like the guy, but somehow I don't think their relationship was as deep as he would like people to believe. Peter Freestone wrote in his latest book, THE AFTERLIFE, that he would not have written the forward in Jim's book, if he had read it beforehand. He and several other people in Freddie's inner circle have stated that they don't recall a lot of things happening exactly the same way that Jim does. As far as Mary Austin goes, obviously it was Freddie's decision to leave her the lion's share of his estate. He could have left it to anyone of his choosing, including Jim Hutton. |