hey bri
youre telling chris evans on the brits show that he won't get any comedy out of you.........................yet you're taking 'queen' out on the road again. that's a good laugh
john deacon is the best - he's keeping queen a legend by doing nothing and staying out of the way.
discuss these points if you've loved them since 1974.......i'm am so browned off that queen are being taken down the toilet by two members that i had so much respect for - rodgers is going to be a shambles 'we will rock you baby yeah baby baby' as sung on the hall of fame - go home
<font color=gold> Dennis tm wrote:
compeltely agree.
- No Queen without Freddie or John
- And indead that awfull orgasm like "yeah yeah yeah" or even the "Kicking your pall aaalll (orgasm in his voice) oveeeer theeee plaaaaceeeeee" made me quit hate Rodgers. Indead he hasn't got the same style as Freddie since Freddie was good.
I'm not a Robbie Williams fan but he is a Queen fan and he is way more within the Queen-style as that bloody Rodgers. I should have picked Robbie.
Brian, however I got lot's of respect for Brian and I got a lot from him through his music, I hope he won't siol the legend of Queen, what's starting now.
cheers,
Dennis
Dennis, you are so right... I totally agree with you... Especially the Paul Rodgers part... they should've picked Robbie Williams, or even better, George Michael...
They both get a lot closer to Freddie than that stupid Paul Rodgers....
but eh... who are we to say so?
Bri and Rog don't seem to care about the opinions of the fans...
Here we go again!!! This has been discussed so many times. I'm really pissed off at hearing no Queen without Freddie or John. Just **** off and be grateful that Bri & Rog are touring. Who the **** wants to hear Bri & Rog playing Wham songs or Robbie numbers.....it would be a ******* joke.
I would not have bought tickets if it was Robbie Williams.
Its not Queen really, I think using the Queen name for the two of them was a bad move, people will be expecting the old Freddie, but what do you do? The more educated people will know what the tour is about and thats three and some more good musicians bonding together and making good music.
And as for Chris Evans, don't get me started on him...
I don't like snow.
However, no matter how much I could go around telling people that,
it wouldn't make it any less white outside.
Bri and Rog chose Paul because he works for THEM.
Queen is their job.
Queen is not some amazing legacy that should be held so high that no-one could ever touch it but Freddie.
John has retired from his job.
Bri and Rog have decided to go back to work.
It's really not that complicated.
How can anyone of us (Joe Public) pretend that something so personal to THEM (Bri and Rog) could mean more to any one of us?
We were never apart of Queen.
We will never be apart of Queen.
We did not make the decisions that have carried them thru the last few decades.
We merely supported the decisions THEY made.
THEY made US like THEM.
If you don't like the decisions they are making, the logical thing to do would be to not support them.
I, for one, am stoked to see tham "make some noise".
We-Are-The-Champions wrote: Here we go again!!! This has been discussed so many times. I'm really pissed off at hearing no Queen without Freddie or John. Just **** off and be grateful that Bri & Rog are touring. Who the **** wants to hear Bri & Rog playing Wham songs or Robbie numbers.....it would be a ******* joke.
I'm not as reserved. Please fucking enough. Its happening so fucking get over it.
<font color = "crimson">ThomasQuinn wrote: It's not Queen MK1, but this Queen MK2 will be interesting, though VERY different from MK1. At
In gradeschool I learned to use context clues,
so I know I agree with you, but what does MK1 and MK2 mean?
MK1 = Mark 1 (original line up)
MK2 = Mark 2 (Bri/Rog + guests)
MK is an abbreviation for Mark and refers to different stages or development of the original idea while keeping the original name. I think that's it.