The hits keep coming against Michael Jackson. Now the pop singer’s ex-wife reportedly alleges that Jackson is not the natural father of his eldest two children.
Debbie Rowe, alleges in court papers that the sperm of an anonymous donor was used to artificial inseminate her, not Jackson’s. Which, if true means that Jackson’s son Prince Michael Jr. and daughter Paris are not his biological children.
Rowe is currently taking legal action against Jackson attempting to have the children removed from Jackson’s custody.
In legal papers filed in the California court for her case against Jackson, Rowe stipulates the nature of her arrangements with Jackson. She originally entered into a surrogacy agreement with the pop singer in January of 1996 and was paid $6 million in cash as well as other goods including a $1.6 million home in Beverly Hills, a car, clothing and jewelry.
The papers further allege that her marriage to Jackson less than a year later was only consummated in order to secure Jackson’s parental rights to Prince Michael Jr., who was born three months after the marriage.
The marriage split up a year after a second child, Paris, was born in April of 1998.
The identity of the birth mother of Jackson’s third child, Prince Michael II, is unknown.
Rowe says that she has “no information whatsoever about the identity of the semen donor for either child" she had for Jackson. (maybe it was bobo?)
There's absolutely no way that Michael Jackson could have been the donor of the sperm, whether the fertilization was artificial or natural.
His DNA still carries black genes, which are usually the dominant. So it's impossible that out of 3 kids, none of them were going to be born black.
To add to Jacko's woe's, and according to The Sun newspaper in the UK, he is a "boozed up drug addict" who gave a 12 year old Gavin Arvizo "wine and sexually abused him"
Heres a link link