fras444 01.08.2018 18:49 |
link Could Queen+ adam ever do something similar like this? |
dysan 01.08.2018 18:56 |
I think they probably do, yes? |
mooghead 01.08.2018 20:37 |
It is pretty shit to use the word 'Queen' in your title when you mean 'Queen+' Two completely different things.. |
reesefallon 02.08.2018 03:49 |
|
queenfanbg 02.08.2018 07:40 |
Basically, the most correct is "B.May&R.Taylor+" |
The Fairy King 02.08.2018 13:55 |
Ugh...here we go.. |
Star* 02.08.2018 18:00 |
Oh my god forget this Lambert mush and enjoy past Queen masterpieces. Lambert still infatuated with his mothers dressing up box. |
Saint Jiub 02.08.2018 22:21 |
happystar wrote: Oh my god forget this Lambert mush and enjoy past Queen masterpieces. Lambert still infatuated with his mothers dressing up box.Thank you for your continuously repeated non-constructive criticism ... :p |
Sealion 02.08.2018 22:37 |
dysan wrote: I think they probably do, yes?Yes. That‘s why they mostly play their greatest hits. It‘s what the majority listens to.... |
louis.007 03.08.2018 00:04 |
Smile + |
The Fairy King 03.08.2018 07:19 |
louis.007 wrote: Smile +How is it Smile? There's no Tim Staffell. :') |
Star* 03.08.2018 15:10 |
The fairy king: The same as Queen is Queen without John & Freddie. ! Technically not right but its done just for the money side of things. |
Sealion 03.08.2018 15:39 |
The Fairy King wrote:So it‘s 2/3 Smile + Adam Lambert covering Queen‘s music?louis.007 wrote: Smile +How is it Smile? There's no Tim Staffell. :') ;-) |
Star* 03.08.2018 19:50 |
Sealion i guess it is yeah but they prefer to use the name Queen as they will sell more tickets |
Sealion 03.08.2018 20:47 |
happystar wrote: Sealion i guess it is yeah but they prefer to use the name Queen as they will sell more ticketsOff course they do. Would you not? |
Day dop 04.08.2018 03:38 |
There's a Queen+ Adam Lambert section on this forum for Queen+ crap. |
Sealion 04.08.2018 05:33 |
Day dop wrote: There's a Queen+ Adam Lambert section on this forum for Queen+ crap.You are right. But maybe people don‘t bother to post there as long as every thread there gets immidiately destroyed by 2 trolls. As long as it is the Q+ section it seems to be OK to insult other people. Barely anyone here cares. |
Star* 04.08.2018 09:14 |
Sealion You are a hypocrite, for you are always posting in the Queen + Lambert section and as "Daydrop" calls it Queen+crap section which is it. You girls on there talk utter drivel and wouldnt know real talent if it slapped you in the face your all so dense. God knows what shit you have in your cd collection as well. |
Sealion 04.08.2018 10:02 |
happystar wrote: Sealion You are a hypocrite, for you are always posting in the Queen + Lambert section and as "Daydrop" calls it Queen+crap section which is it. You girls on there talk utter drivel and wouldnt know real talent if it slapped you in the face your all so dense. God knows what shit you have in your cd collection as well.Thanks for proving my point. And again, you call me a girl. Do you have a problem with women? For those, who don‘t read in the Q+ section: I‘m male and a Queen fan for almost 40 years. Was lucky to see them with Freddie live. But since 2015 I can also appreciate Q+AL. And that makes me a girl and a Glambert. The posts in that part of this forum are full of such nice responds from happystar (who is never happy) and runner. So I don‘t wonder at all, that some discussions of QAL might shift to other parts of the forum. And no, I don‘t speak for the OP. Maybe he/she just didn‘t know that this topic doesn‘t belong here. |
Saint Jiub 04.08.2018 14:33 |
Sealion wrote:Excellent Post ... but of course happystar is incapable of understandinghappystar wrote: Sealion You are a hypocrite, for you are always posting in the Queen + Lambert section and as "Daydrop" calls it Queen+crap section which is it. You girls on there talk utter drivel and wouldnt know real talent if it slapped you in the face your all so dense. God knows what shit you have in your cd collection as well.Thanks for proving my point. And again, you call me a girl. Do you have a problem with women? For those, who don‘t read in the Q+ section: I‘m male and a Queen fan for almost 40 years. Was lucky to see them with Freddie live. But since 2015 I can also appreciate Q+AL. And that makes me a girl and a Glambert. The posts in that part of this forum are full of such nice responds from happystar (who is never happy) and runner. So I don‘t wonder at all, that some discussions of QAL might shift to other parts of the forum. And no, I don‘t speak for the OP. Maybe he/she just didn‘t know that this topic doesn‘t belong here. |
Day dop 04.08.2018 15:01 |
Sealion, I don't care about petty squabbles. All I know is that I clicked on this to find that it wasn't about Queen, but Queen+. And there's a Queen+ section, so that's where it belongs. |
Star* 04.08.2018 15:34 |
sealion so if your a guy then you must be gay if you like Lambert because i dont know any straight guys who could appreciate that mixed up entity. |
Sealion 04.08.2018 15:43 |
happystar wrote: sealion so if your a guy then you must be gay if you like Lambert because i dont know any straight guys who could appreciate that mixed up entity.Great. Again proving my point. And even including an homophobic comment. How much more do the moderators of this forum need to throw this member out? And happystar: I would rather be gay than as hateful and full of prejudices as you are. |
Star* 04.08.2018 18:28 |
Sealion I am not homophobic, Freddie was gay you stupid doyle. There is no moderators on here because they hate Lambert too, ha ha ha |
rockchic65 04.08.2018 18:45 |
happystar wrote: sealion so if your a guy then you must be gay if you like Lambert because i dont know any straight guys who could appreciate that mixed up entity.You can't be serious, there are tons of straight guys who comment after the shows and defend Lambert from comments like yours on facebook. You must have some seriously weird ideas to think only a gay guy could like him, most people male or female don't care about the fact he's gay they care if he can sing and put on a show, that's all they're interested in, not what he gets up to off stage. |
Sealion 04.08.2018 18:45 |
happystar wrote: Sealion I am not homophobic.One would think so on a Queen board. Unfortunately your comments here and on other threads clearly prove the opposite. |
Day dop 04.08.2018 19:29 |
Be it the Queenzone forum or the official Facebook page, since Lambert is forced on everyone who wants to read the forum or follow the Queen facebook page, it's just been a shitfest of arguments. I really wish the Queen+ Lambert stuff could be kept separate. |
rockchic65 04.08.2018 19:35 |
Day dop wrote: Be it the Queenzone forum or the official Facebook page, since Lambert is forced on everyone who wants to read the forum or follow the Queen facebook page, it's just been a shitfest of arguments. I really wish the Queen+ Lambert stuff could be kept separate.Is there no mod who can move threads onto the correct board? |
Saint Jiub 04.08.2018 19:38 |
Day dop wrote: Be it the Queenzone forum or the official Facebook page, since Lambert is forced on everyone who wants to read the forum or follow the Queen facebook page, it's just been a shitfest of arguments. I really wish the Queen+ Lambert stuff could be kept separate.Quite simple really, don't read it ... especially if responding to QAL raises your blood pressure. Personally, I avoid the QAL section as it does not interest me. |
Star* 05.08.2018 07:26 |
There you are Glamberts 2 more Queen fans on here who is not interested in the appalling ghastly hype that is Adam (wheres my eyeliner) Lambert. |
rockchic65 05.08.2018 09:41 |
happystar wrote: There you are Glamberts 2 more Queen fans on here who is not interested in the appalling ghastly hype that is Adam (wheres my eyeliner) Lambert.And what about all the one's who are? No one's expecting every single Queen fan to like him, but don't try to make out there's none because that's rubbish and you know it. |
Star* 05.08.2018 10:43 |
You will find out of the thousands of Queen fans on Queenzone many of them hate the Queen Lambert combo and that is why none of them bother with the Q+AL threads only the 4 same maniacs that post everyday telling us how wonderful the fake Lambert is. |
rockchic65 05.08.2018 12:09 |
happystar wrote: You will find out of the thousands of Queen fans on Queenzone many of them hate the Queen Lambert combo and that is why none of them bother with the Q+AL threads only the 4 same maniacs that post everyday telling us how wonderful the fake Lambert is.Do you know what I find strange - you and runner spend nearly all your time on a Queen forum posting in the Q+ section about someone you claim to hate, I would be willing to bet you post nearly as often there as his so called maniac fans you're quoting, and when you do post in the Queen only section it's usually in response to someone inadvertently posting about QAL. At least his maniac fans are posting about someone they like. Think about it!! |
Star* 05.08.2018 12:21 |
We are posting because 99% of this website is for Queen supporters not Adam Lambert twits. You come on here pissing us all off with your pathetic drivel over one guy who has not got number one hit under his belt and acts like a knob on stage. wake smell the coffee, the guy is a nobody and when Queen thankfully call it a day Lambert wont be around long |
thomasquinn 32989 05.08.2018 12:34 |
happystar wrote: Sealion I am not homophobic, Freddie was gay you stupid doyle. There is no moderators on here because they hate Lambert too, ha ha haOk, it's painfully obvious that you are extremely dumb, so I'll try to put this in terms even you can understand, if you have an adult read them to you *really slowly*. 1) You hate Queen + Adam Lambert 2) You say a man who likes AL must be gay, because no straight man can like him. 3) In your mind, liking AL = bad. And, man liking AL = gay 4) Therefore, you are using gay as a slur: "your taste is so bad, you must be gay" That is homophobic. Now go find that adult to read it to you very slowly. It might take a couple of tries, but I'm sure that, with a patient adult to help you, you can figure it out eventually. |
thomasquinn 32989 05.08.2018 12:36 |
happystar wrote: We are posting because 99% of this website is for Queen supporters not Adam Lambert twits. You come on here pissing us all off with your pathetic drivel over one guy who has not got number one hit under his belt and acts like a knob on stage. wake smell the coffee, the guy is a nobody and when Queen thankfully call it a day Lambert wont be around longYeah, you might not have noticed this because you're so self-obsessed, but everyone here, including those of us who don't like Q+AL (such as I), completely and utterly hate you and your sad little buddy runner_70. You are the lowest of low on this forum and universally despised. |
rockchic65 05.08.2018 12:37 |
happystar wrote: We are posting because 99% of this website is for Queen supporters not Adam Lambert twits. You come on here pissing us all off with your pathetic drivel over one guy who has not got number one hit under his belt and acts like a knob on stage. wake smell the coffee, the guy is a nobody and when Queen thankfully call it a day Lambert wont be around longThat proves my point, 99% of the website is for Queen supporters of which you claim to be one yet you spend 99% of your time posting about Q+AL. Wouldn't it be more productive to do like the majority of Queen supporters and discuss Queen related things on the Queen boards and ignore the QAL section? They don't all keep posting negative comments all day about Lambert, I guess they either aren't interested in him, actively dislike him and have said so at some point and don't think he's worth any more of their time or the one's who do like him can't be bothered wading through the endless crap to bother posting on there. Makes far more sense to me. |
Star* 05.08.2018 12:46 |
True many would be just idol to accept and ignore what is happening in Queen today, but not me i have given my entire life to Queen and i am entitled more than most to show my utter disgust It is the ardent Queen fans that gave those two the luxury of mansions and a good lifestyle and all they can do is spoil things now. They could have gone on tour without anyone to front Queen after all they both had solo tours and they have plenty of experience doing that. Yes i think May Taylor have got big headed thinking, we dont need Freddie or John and we can still make millions of pounds. |
thomasquinn 32989 05.08.2018 12:51 |
Hahaha! "i have given my entire life to Queen", "i am entitled". Wow. Just, wow. Maybe you should just talk to your doctor about this, 'cause this isn't healthy behaviour. Seriously, how old are you? If the answer is anything over 15, you seriously need professional help to deal with this. |
Star* 05.08.2018 12:54 |
Lots of people have followed there fav artists and some are lifelong fans like myself. It has nothing to do with seeing a doctor, do you consider yourself as a Queen fan or do you come on here to mock people? |
rockchic65 05.08.2018 12:55 |
@thomasquinn 32989 Agreed, I'm all out of words for that last post, mind completely blown! |
thomasquinn 32989 05.08.2018 12:57 |
I like Queen, and have for about 18 years. I certainly haven't "given my entire life to Queen" or consider myself "entitled", and nor has any other sane person. Your behavior on this forum is not just rude and obnoxious, it is deeply disturbing and you really need to ask yourself some hard questions about what you're doing. This is not healthy. |
Star* 05.08.2018 13:00 |
Well there you go i have been a Queen fan for 44 years and i have more admiration for those guys than you. I am passionate for what i believe in and Freddie was the ultimate professional and showman, surely worth arguing for. |
thomasquinn 32989 05.08.2018 13:09 |
You fail to see the point, once again. This is not about who is the bigger fan, or how long you've been a fan. This is about obsession, an inability to deal with other opinions and a sense of entitlement. Your behavior is not healthy. I can't do anything more than point that out. Many others have, too. Now it's up to you to be a responsible adult and realize you really need to do something about this. Seriously, you NEED to do something about this. |
Saint Jiub 05.08.2018 13:54 |
Fuck off Happyshit. |
Saint Jiub 05.08.2018 13:59 |
happystar wrote: i have given my entire life to Queen and i am entitled moreYou are entitled to nothing ... Now please bugger along and cease your QAL censorship crusade. |
Saint Jiub 05.08.2018 14:07 |
happystar wrote: Well there you go i have been a Queen fan for 44 yearsMy gay cock is bigger than your flaccid cheese doodle. I too have been a Queen fan for 44 years. I command you to stop your pointless censorship crusade. |
rockchic65 05.08.2018 14:29 |
happystar wrote: Well there you go i have been a Queen fan for 44 years and i have more admiration for those guys than you.I've also been a fan for 44 years but don't really know what that's meant to prove. |
Star* 05.08.2018 16:35 |
Well if you have been a Queen fan for 44 years you were not taking much attention were you? You accept from a magnificent brilliant front man only to be replaced by a guy who came from nothing and now hyped up by lies and deceit from Brian May! You must have your eyes closed and you must be deaf. |
Star* 05.08.2018 16:38 |
Saint Jiub: You are another idiot and judas if you have been a Queen fan for 44 years. Even the wise John Deacon refuses to get involved with this embarrassment they call Queen + Dont sit there and call yourself a Queen fan and stab Freddie in the fucking back you piece of shit. |
rockchic65 05.08.2018 16:43 |
happystar wrote: Well if you have been a Queen fan for 44 years you were not taking much attention were you? You accept from a magnificent brilliant front man only to be replaced by a guy who came from nothing and now hyped up by lies and deceit from Brian May! You must have your eyes closed and you must be deaf.Nothing of the sort, I just don't categorize people based something as petty as being on a talent show. He didn't come from nothing, he worked hard for years, long before he went on Idol, that was just a shortcut to some better work in his mind, he didn't even expect to get past the first couple of rounds, just hoped it would open a few doors in the theater world. And I recognize talent when I see/hear it, there's nothing hyped and no lies from Brian, he has brilliant vocal technique and has great stage presence and personality. He won't be everyone's taste but that applies to anyone, and the reason I can accept him is I don't compare him to Freddie, they are completely different type's of people with completely different persona's. I happen to like him, if I didn't I just wouldn't watch vids or go to see them, it's that simple for me. |
Day dop 05.08.2018 17:00 |
Saint Jiub wrote "Quite simple really, don't read it ... especially if responding to QAL raises your blood pressure. Personally, I avoid the QAL section as it does not interest me. " That's a bit of a weird response. Until you've read something you don't know what's been written. Unless you're advocating for people who tire of the arguments over Lambert to not come onto a Queen forum whatsoever. In which case it goes back to what I originally said: There's a section for Queen+Lambert on this forum, and the Lambert crap be kept to there where it belongs. Quite simple really. |
Sealion 05.08.2018 17:46 |
Day dop wrote: Be it the Queenzone forum or the official Facebook page, since Lambert is forced on everyone who wants to read the forum or follow the Queen facebook page, it's just been a shitfest of arguments. I really wish the Queen+ Lambert stuff could be kept separate.As I said before, you are right, that the OP posted in the wrong section of the forum. Mistakes happen. And in this forum, it‘s not possible to change that afterwards. So repeating your complaint won‘t help. I have no problem otherwise to keep the Q+ stuff separate. But it would be great, if the members, who hate the collaboration, would stay away from there. As a little hint: The Official Queen Fanclub has a closed Facebook side with thousands of fans. It‘s moderated, so no shitfests. Most members there simply had enough of the arguments on the official page. Shit stirrer get thrown out fast. |
Star* 05.08.2018 17:51 |
So there must have been many people on the Queen fan club facebook site that also hate Queen+ Many do not like it but why must they have to stay quiet for? They are entitled to air there views again and again because glamberts do. |
rockchic65 05.08.2018 18:00 |
happystar wrote: So there must have been many people on the Queen fan club facebook site that also hate Queen+ Many do not like it but why must they have to stay quiet for? They are entitled to air there views again and again because glamberts do.There will always be some but when the same thing happens on there as on the Q+ forum here, where a few repeatedly post the same negative comments over and over on every single post, even Queen posts that have nothing to do with Adam, and under almost every single comment on those posts you can imagine how annoying it gets, for both sets of fans. |
rockchic65 05.08.2018 18:02 |
Sealion wrote: As a little hint: The Official Queen Fanclub has a closed Facebook side with thousands of fans. It‘s moderated, so no shitfests. Most members there simply had enough of the arguments on the official page. Shit stirrer get thrown out fast.Do you know how to find that one, the only one I saw aside from Queen's official facebook was a foreign one? |
Day dop 05.08.2018 18:21 |
Sealion wrote "As I said before, you are right, that the OP posted in the wrong section of the forum. Mistakes happen. And in this forum, it‘s not possible to change that afterwards. So repeating your complaint won‘t help. I have no problem otherwise to keep the Q+ stuff separate. But it would be great, if the members, who hate the collaboration, would stay away from there. As a little hint: The Official Queen Fanclub has a closed Facebook side with thousands of fans. It‘s moderated, so no shitfests. Most members there simply had enough of the arguments on the official page. Shit stirrer get thrown out fast." I repeated what i said based on your reply. Everything in its right place, and then it's up to people whether they visit said place or not, whether they like or dislike the collaboration. For many long term Queen fans, it would've been better if a separate Facebook page was created for the Queen+ Lambert stuff. I've unfollowed in the past when they get heavy on posting Lambert photos. After all, I'm a fan of Queen: Freddie Mercury, Brian May, Roger Taylor, John Deacon (which is what the Facebook Queen page describes Queen as, which is what Queen was). I'm not a fan of Queen+, May and Taylor going under the banner of Queen+ with a fill-in bass players and singers. Especially Lambert. I saw them in 2012, and it was great to see Roger and Brian again, but I find Lambert a little unbearable. That said, it's all about money and getting people to the concerts including other long term Queen fans, like me, who want to see Brian and Roger play live again, so of course they'll promote it on the Queen page where there's thousands upon thousands of fans. It's not hard to see how the page ended up divided, between lot of Queen fans and a Glamberts policing the page, telling anyone who voices their view that they don't agree with to go elsewhere. |
Sealion 05.08.2018 18:32 |
rockchic65 wrote:Link: linkSealion wrote: As a little hint: The Official Queen Fanclub has a closed Facebook side with thousands of fans. It‘s moderated, so no shitfests. Most members there simply had enough of the arguments on the official page. Shit stirrer get thrown out fast.Do you know how to find that one, the only one I saw aside from Queen's official facebook was a foreign one? It has more than 37.000 members. And I‘m sure, @happystar, many of them stated their opinions on the official site. |
Saint Jiub 05.08.2018 18:32 |
Day dop wrote: Saint Jiub wrote "Quite simple really, don't read it ... especially if responding to QAL raises your blood pressure. Personally, I avoid the QAL section as it does not interest me. " That's a bit of a weird response. Until you've read something you don't know what's been written. Unless you're advocating for people who tire of the arguments over Lambert to not come onto a Queen forum whatsoever.I am advocating for happystar / runner and other shit stirrers to stay out of the QAL forum if they cannot play nicely. All that bile that they spout will give themselves ulcers or a brain aneurysm. I did not advocate for avoiding Queenzone. |
Day dop 05.08.2018 18:36 |
Saint Jiub wrote "I did not advocate for avoiding Queenzone." Yes, I wasn't sure whether that was the case, but I see that now. The reply button doesn't work for me on here anymore btw, hence I write the name and put the quote myself. |
Star* 05.08.2018 18:56 |
Saint Juib I am well capable of understanding expect many on here talk utter rubbish considering Queen was a very educated band many of there so called fans are knob heads including you my friend. 40 year old Queen fan who just like the band has lost the plot. i am losing the will to live now! |
thomasquinn 32989 05.08.2018 19:01 |
happystar wrote: Saint Juib I am well capable of understanding expect many on here talk utter rubbish considering Queen was a very educated band many of there so called fans are knob heads including you my friend. 40 year old Queen fan who just like the band has lost the plot. i am losing the will to live now!Look here, if you want to decry the poor intelligence of Queen fans, as contrasted with the band, which you say was "very educated", then maybe, just maybe, you shouldn't do so in a post of 57 words that contains at least three major errors in language, plus a handful of minor ones and dreadful interpunction. I'm Dutch - what's your excuse for writing so horridly? |
rockchic65 05.08.2018 19:06 |
Sealion wrote:Cheers Sealion, I'll take a look at that.rockchic65 wrote:Link: link It has more than 37.000 members. And I‘m sure, @happystar, many of them stated their opinions on the official site.Sealion wrote: As a little hint: The Official Queen Fanclub has a closed Facebook side with thousands of fans. It‘s moderated, so no shitfests. Most members there simply had enough of the arguments on the official page. Shit stirrer get thrown out fast.Do you know how to find that one, the only one I saw aside from Queen's official facebook was a foreign one? |
Star* 05.08.2018 19:10 |
Saint juib Your Dutch well i pity you go and find a pale of water and drown yourself , yodel yodelayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy |
rockchic65 05.08.2018 19:16 |
Day dop wrote: I'm not a fan of Queen+, May and Taylor going under the banner of Queen+ with a fill-in bass players and singers. Especially Lambert. I saw them in 2012, and it was great to see Roger and Brian again, but I find Lambert a little unbearable. It's not hard to see how the page ended up divided, between lot of Queen fans and a Glamberts policing the page, telling anyone who voices their view that they don't agree with to go elsewhere.Not expecting you to change your mind but there's a massive difference between the 2012 shows and the current one. I do think it would be good if they had a separate Q+ facebook page, the comments get utterly ridiculous but it's not all glamberts by any means - runner is one example who posts about Lambert being a ladyboy and raping goats and all the other things he posts on here under almost every comment, even when the post is about original Queen stuff. Added to that you've got Martel fans posting vids saying he should be the frontman etc. All it's done is make the original Queen fans who've been to shows stick up for Lambert so the posts end up a mile long and more and more vitriolic. There's probably more Queen fans than glamberts posting on there actually and then all the casual fans who've been to a show and want to post about their experience, often to a friend and their post gets hijacked as well. Not sure if there was a separate page it would stop some though, some seem to like the drama and obviously original Queen fans want to stay on the Queen page as well but get dragged into it since it's hard to ignore. |
Saint Jiub 05.08.2018 19:22 |
oops |
Saint Jiub 05.08.2018 19:23 |
happystar wrote: Saint juib Your Dutch well i pity you go and find a pale of water and drown yourself , yodel yodelayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyWrong again. I am not a Dutch descendant. I am a curbstone setter America dog with ancestors from 5 European countries, but not The Netherlands. |
thomasquinn 32989 05.08.2018 19:39 |
happystar wrote: Saint juib Your Dutch well i pity you go and find a pale of water and drown yourself , yodel yodelayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy1) I'm not, nor have I ever been, "Saint Juib". Nor "Saint Jiub". Your first hint would be that it says "thomasquinn 32989" next to my post, not "Saint Juib" 2) Yodeling is not, nor has it ever been, related in any way to The Netherlands or the Dutch. We might've played a nasty part in the slave trade, we might've been shamelessly profiteering off both sides in World War I, but yodeling is one crime against humanity that we, as a nation, are entirely innocent of. 3) I would humbly suggest you take your own advice and end your life by inhaling a large quantity of water, or, failing that, that you would at least wash your foul mouth out with soap before proceeding to sodomize yourself with a large piece of rusty rebar. |
Star* 06.08.2018 07:19 |
Thomaquinn For goodness sake get a life and get down from your high horse man. You do not have a sense of humour do you? So you have only been a Queen fan for 18 years so you have never seen them live with Freddie then? Well if that is the case you do not really have a case to answer too. As for washing my mouth out, it was you that told me a few weeks ago to wear a thicker skin on here when someone was the same with me , so people in glasshouses Tom cat ! |
emrabt 06.08.2018 09:03 |
I think maybe happystar is confusing Netherlands with Switzerland? |
thomasquinn 32989 06.08.2018 09:04 |
It's abundantly clear that you are the one who has no sense of humour, no sense of proportion, no class, no decency, no shame and precious little self-awareness. You can barely read, you are incapable of such simple things as figuring out which comment was made by which poster, despite the fact that the names are right next to the comments, you are foul-mouthed, repetitive and dull. Basically, you've never demonstrated anything at all in your posts that would make you the least bit likeable or interesting as a person. I can see why you're such an obsessed arrogant ass about Queen - you are a useless whining babyboomer with a huge sense of entitlement but no achievements or qualities to your name. Your social skills are probably negligible, judging from your extreme inability to not just put into practice but even recognize simple social cues. I am truly sorry that your life is so miserable that your 40+-year unhealthy fixation with a band is the only significant thing in your life, to such an extent that you feel the need to throw hissy fits whenever fans of said band don't tow your obsessive, fanatical quasi-religious line. I recommend you seek out some nice relaxing activities for senior citizens in your neighborhood, I'm sure it'll do you good. |
The Fairy King 06.08.2018 10:42 |
thomasquinn 32989 wrote: It's abundantly clear that you are the one who has no sense of humour, no sense of proportion, no class, no decency, no shame and precious little self-awareness. You can barely read, you are incapable of such simple things as figuring out which comment was made by which poster, despite the fact that the names are right next to the comments, you are foul-mouthed, repetitive and dull. Basically, you've never demonstrated anything at all in your posts that would make you the least bit likeable or interesting as a person. I can see why you're such an obsessed arrogant ass about Queen - you are a useless whining babyboomer with a huge sense of entitlement but no achievements or qualities to your name. Your social skills are probably negligible, judging from your extreme inability to not just put into practice but even recognize simple social cues. I am truly sorry that your life is so miserable that your 40+-year unhealthy fixation with a band is the only significant thing in your life, to such an extent that you feel the need to throw hissy fits whenever fans of said band don't tow your obsessive, fanatical quasi-religious line. I recommend you seek out some nice relaxing activities for senior citizens in your neighborhood, I'm sure it'll do you good.">link |
Star* 06.08.2018 11:05 |
ThomasQuinn Your need to reply back to me shows you are bothered with what i say so thanks for the interest. You are just like the rest on here a big hypocrite name calling even though you accuse me of it. Now you are insulting everyone who has reading problems or anything else which makes them vulnerable. By the way nothing wrong with my reading skills, so your rant is a waste of time. You know fuck all about my life so do not judge me with your smart arse one liners. My life is a very nice one thank you very much, and i was brought up by good parents and educated very well and i do have good manners but i do not tolerate many of the morons on this site with there laack of respect towards Mr Mercury and that is why i do get nasty. You obviously never witnessed Freddie just 8 feet away from you. You do not understand 87% of Queen history but your like a sheep on here repeating what they have said time and time again. Get a life before you go stale matey. |
Day dop 07.08.2018 16:05 |
rockchic 65 wrote "Not expecting you to change your mind but there's a massive difference between the 2012 shows and the current one. I do think it would be good if they had a separate Q+ facebook page, the comments get utterly ridiculous but it's not all glamberts by any means - runner is one example who posts about Lambert being a ladyboy and raping goats and all the other things he posts on here under almost every comment, even when the post is about original Queen stuff. Added to that you've got Martel fans posting vids saying he should be the frontman etc. All it's done is make the original Queen fans who've been to shows stick up for Lambert so the posts end up a mile long and more and more vitriolic. There's probably more Queen fans than glamberts posting on there actually and then all the casual fans who've been to a show and want to post about their experience, often to a friend and their post gets hijacked as well. Not sure if there was a separate page it would stop some though, some seem to like the drama and obviously original Queen fans want to stay on the Queen page as well but get dragged into it since it's hard to ignore. " I've nosed at the videos of recent concerts. The stage is different and they're playing different songs. I can see that. May and Taylor still seem to be playing much the same, and that's all good. The issue is Lambert. I find the guy tacky, and as soon as he starts singing - especially when he reaches the higher notes, I have to switch off. It's a harsh, grating voice. Back in 2012, I could put up with it, but now, I can't stand it anymore. I see the issue on fb as the Lambert posts being shared. Many Queen fans don't want to see that. And of course, that, as well as a bunch of Lambert fans all over the page doesn't help matters. I don't think it's surprising many of the long-term Queen fans wouldn't like that. It'd be like having Will Young fans being pushed on Led Zeppelin fans. For the Lambert fans to tell anyone who criticises the collaboration or Lambert to go elsewhere or ask them why they're following the page - what's supposed to be a Queen page - well... I can see how it's turned into what it has. i disagree with you about it not being all the Glamberts. It wasn't happening before the collaboration because they weren't on the page. |
Star* 07.08.2018 18:36 |
Day drop good post and you are right, Lambert has become too big for his boots and how dare he wear the crown and cape and his voice does not do Queen music any justice at all He is simply musical theatre and that is it. Freddie was pure rock n roll and he was brilliant. |
Saint Jiub 07.08.2018 18:41 |
edit misquote |
rockchic65 07.08.2018 19:01 |
Day dop wrote: I see the issue on fb as the Lambert posts being shared. Many Queen fans don't want to see that. And of course, that, as well as a bunch of Lambert fans all over the page doesn't help matters. I don't think it's surprising many of the long-term Queen fans wouldn't like that. It'd be like having Will Young fans being pushed on Led Zeppelin fans. For the Lambert fans to tell anyone who criticises the collaboration or Lambert to go elsewhere or ask them why they're following the page - what's supposed to be a Queen page - well... I can see how it's turned into what it has. i disagree with you about it not being all the Glamberts. It wasn't happening before the collaboration because they weren't on the page.Maybe I didn't explain very well when I said it's not all Glamberts. Obviously there are Adam's fans posting as well but a lot of the comments are Queen fans who dislike the collaboration and Queen fans who have been to shows and love it and a few who don't care for it themselves but are happy for Brian & Roger to still be touring. The arguments are in a lot of cases between those types of fan. A lot of Adam's fans actually post on his own page rather than the Queen one. If you check out the post from today advertising the Vegas shows you can see lots of Queen fans arguing with the naysayers and Martel fans, they aren't Glamberts, unless you're classing any Queen fan who embraces the collab as a Glambert. |
Day dop 07.08.2018 20:04 |
Saint Jiub wrote "Key point by Day dop: "the comments get utterly ridiculous but it's not all glamberts by any means - runner is one example who posts about Lambert being a ladyboy and raping goats and all the other things he posts on here under almost every comment, even when the post is about original Queen stuff. "" I didn't write that. |
Day dop 07.08.2018 20:12 |
Rockchic65 wrote "Maybe I didn't explain very well when I said it's not all Glamberts. Obviously there are Adam's fans posting as well but a lot of the comments are Queen fans who dislike the collaboration and Queen fans who have been to shows and love it and a few who don't care for it themselves but are happy for Brian & Roger to still be touring. The arguments are in a lot of cases between those types of fan. A lot of Adam's fans actually post on his own page rather than the Queen one. If you check out the post from today advertising the Vegas shows you can see lots of Queen fans arguing with the naysayers and Martel fans, they aren't Glamberts, unless you're classing any Queen fan who embraces the collab as a Glambert." I did say "many Queen fans" (which isn't every single one. Some are easily pleased). And the overwhelming majority of Queen fans followed the page as they're fans of Queen, not Lambert. What I do know is that since the page is sharing Lambert posts, and it's been invaded by his fans, the whole thing has become a mess. It's a shame. I unfollowed the page as I have zero interest in seeing photos of Lambert in my newsfeed, which would please his fans, as they don't want anyone who doesn't agree with them to voice their views. |
Sealion 07.08.2018 20:18 |
@Daydrop I only see about 2 Lambert fans on this site. Most members, who post in this Q+ section are Queen fans, who enjoy the gigs with Lambert and like to discuss them, like myself. But that‘s almost impossible, because we get attacked by two guys, who think, it‘s not allowed to do that. Every sensible Lambert fan has long left that site. ;-) |
Day dop 07.08.2018 22:13 |
That’s probably how many Queen fans feel. Its how they’ve been treated by Lambert fans on the official Queen Facebook page. I’m sure I’m far from the only Queen fan who's left there over it, be it being told to go elsewhere by Lambert fans because you voice your view, or after observing them attempting to police the page and ganging up. That, and the sharing of Lambert stuff. |
Sealion 07.08.2018 22:43 |
Day dop wrote: That’s probably how many Queen fans feel. Its how they’ve been treated by Lambert fans on the official Queen Facebook page. I’m sure I’m far from the only Queen fan who's left there over it, be it being told to go elsewhere by Lambert fans because you voice your view, or after observing them attempting to police the page and ganging up. That, and the sharing of Lambert stuff.When I‘m on the Queen Facebook site I simply scroll to the Q+AL parts or don‘t read the comments. And that‘s easy, because there are not that many posts about them anyway. But you are always talking about Queen and Lambert fans. By far the most people at the gigs are Queen fans, who simply love and enjoy the shows. And from my point of view it‘s mostly them, who defend the collaboration On Facebook. See, I know a few of them (not too closely) and they are definitely no Lambert fans. I think, it‘s pretty natural, that longtime Queen fans go to Queen‘s social media pages to talk about the gigs. Wherelse should we go? As long as the Queen media management doesn‘t set up separate pages, there is no other choice. Maybe some more critical Queen fans like you can think about that and just scroll, instead of telling us, we were Lambert fans and on the wrong page? |
rockchic65 07.08.2018 22:50 |
Day dop wrote: That’s probably how many Queen fans feel. Its how they’ve been treated by Lambert fans on the official Queen Facebook page. I’m sure I’m far from the only Queen fan who's left there over it, be it being told to go elsewhere by Lambert fans because you voice your view, or after observing them attempting to police the page and ganging up. That, and the sharing of Lambert stuff.No idea how long ago you left the facebook page but how would you know if they are strictly Lambert fans? I've just been reading the comments and there are loads from Queen fans defending him - they are people who've been Queen fans for years and in many cases saw Freddie live. Others are clearly casual Queen fans who've been to a show and thought it was great. People who don't like this collaboration seem to ignore the obvious since it doesn't fit what they want to believe, but the truth is there are more and more Queen fans giving the shows a go and liking them and Adam and are in a lot of cases the most vocal on there when it comes to telling people who are being downright nasty to get lost. |
Saint Jiub 08.08.2018 01:53 |
edit misquote |
Saint Jiub 08.08.2018 01:59 |
Day dop wrote: Saint Jiub wrote "Key point by Day dop: "the comments get utterly ridiculous but it's not all glamberts by any means - runner is one example who posts about Lambert being a ladyboy and raping goats and all the other things he posts on here under almost every comment, even when the post is about original Queen stuff. "" I didn't write that.Sorry - that was RockChic ... I misread your quoting of RockChic |
Saint Jiub 08.08.2018 02:02 |
rockchic65 wrote:Day dop wrote: I'm not a fan of Queen+, May and Taylor going under the banner of Queen+ with a fill-in bass players and singers. Especially Lambert. I saw them in 2012, and it was great to see Roger and Brian again, but I find Lambert a little unbearable. It's not hard to see how the page ended up divided, between lot of Queen fans and a Glamberts policing the page, telling anyone who voices their view that they don't agree with to go elsewhere.Not expecting you to change your mind but there's a massive difference between the 2012 shows and the current one. I do think it would be good if they had a separate Q+ facebook page, the comments get utterly ridiculous but it's not all glamberts by any means - runner is one example who posts about Lambert being a ladyboy and raping goats and all the other things he posts on here under almost every comment, even when the post is about original Queen stuff. Added to that you've got Martel fans posting vids saying he should be the frontman etc. All it's done is make the original Queen fans who've been to shows stick up for Lambert so the posts end up a mile long and more and more vitriolic. There's probably more Queen fans than glamberts posting on there actually and then all the casual fans who've been to a show and want to post about their experience, often to a friend and their post gets hijacked as well. Not sure if there was a separate page it would stop some though, some seem to like the drama and obviously original Queen fans want to stay on the Queen page as well but get dragged into it since it's hard to ignore. |
Day dop 08.08.2018 06:13 |
Sealion wrote "When I‘m on the Queen Facebook site I simply scroll to the Q+AL parts or don‘t read the comments. And that‘s easy, because there are not that many posts about them anyway. But you are always talking about Queen and Lambert fans. By far the most people at the gigs are Queen fans, who simply love and enjoy the shows. And from my point of view it‘s mostly them, who defend the collaboration On Facebook. See, I know a few of them (not too closely) and they are definitely no Lambert fans. I think, it‘s pretty natural, that longtime Queen fans go to Queen‘s social media pages to talk about the gigs. Wherelse should we go? As long as the Queen media management doesn‘t set up separate pages, there is no other choice. Maybe some more critical Queen fans like you can think about that and just scroll, instead of telling us, we were Lambert fans and on the wrong page?" When I'm on facebook and follow pages, they come up in my newsfeed. And the Facebook Queen page goes through phases of posting too much Queen+Lambert crap for my liking. Then, you read through the comments, and there you see the Lambert fans, policing the page, telling people who dare to voice an opinion they don't like to go elsewhere etc. I'm just repeating myself here. It's crap since the Queen+Lambert stuff gets posted on there and Lambert fans . I unfollowed because it didn't interest me. |
Day dop 08.08.2018 06:20 |
rockchic65 wrote "No idea how long ago you left the facebook page but how would you know if they are strictly Lambert fans? I've just been reading the comments and there are loads from Queen fans defending him - they are people who've been Queen fans for years and in many cases saw Freddie live. Others are clearly casual Queen fans who've been to a show and thought it was great. People who don't like this collaboration seem to ignore the obvious since it doesn't fit what they want to believe, but the truth is there are more and more Queen fans giving the shows a go and liking them and Adam and are in a lot of cases the most vocal on there when it comes to telling people who are being downright nasty to get lost." I know they're Lambert fans from observation. I also observed their coordinated attacks day after day upon anyone who said anything about Lambert that they didn't like. I also spoke to other Queen fans who were well aware of what they were doing and had been observing for quite a while. Queen fans even get jumped on for saying "He's no Freddie", let alone Queen fans who outright don't like the collaboration. People who don't like Queen fans sharing their opinion seem to ignore the obvious since it doesn't fit what they want to believe, but the truth is there are a hell of a lot of Queen fans who don't like the collaboration and have every right to voice their views. |
Day dop 08.08.2018 06:22 |
Saint Jiub said "Not expecting you to change your mind but there's a massive difference between the 2012 shows and the current one. I do think it would be good if they had a separate Q+ facebook page, the comments get utterly ridiculous but it's not all glamberts by any means - runner is one example who posts about Lambert being a ladyboy and raping goats and all the other things he posts on here under almost every comment, even when the post is about original Queen stuff. Added to that you've got Martel fans posting vids saying he should be the frontman etc. All it's done is make the original Queen fans who've been to shows stick up for Lambert so the posts end up a mile long and more and more vitriolic. There's probably more Queen fans than glamberts posting on there actually and then all the casual fans who've been to a show and want to post about their experience, often to a friend and their post gets hijacked as well. Not sure if there was a separate page it would stop some though, some seem to like the drama and obviously original Queen fans want to stay on the Queen page as well but get dragged into it since it's hard to ignore. I already replied to this comment with the following... I've nosed at the videos of recent concerts. The stage is different and they're playing different songs. I can see that. May and Taylor still seem to be playing much the same, and that's all good. The issue is Lambert. I find the guy tacky, and as soon as he starts singing - especially when he reaches the higher notes, I have to switch off. It's a harsh, grating voice. Back in 2012, I could put up with it, but now, I can't stand it anymore. I see the issue on fb as the Lambert posts being shared. Many Queen fans don't want to see that. And of course, that, as well as a bunch of Lambert fans all over the page doesn't help matters. I don't think it's surprising many of the long-term Queen fans wouldn't like that. It'd be like having Will Young fans being pushed on Led Zeppelin fans. For the Lambert fans to tell anyone who criticises the collaboration or Lambert to go elsewhere or ask them why they're following the page - what's supposed to be a Queen page - well... I can see how it's turned into what it has. I disagree with you about it not being all the Glamberts. It wasn't happening before the collaboration because they weren't on the page. |
Star* 08.08.2018 06:56 |
Lambert fans are some of the most arrogant ass holes i have ever come across, they do not understand if it was not for Freddie forming Queen there "gift from god" would be on his arse somewhere twiddling his fingers! I agree with Day Dop Lambert fans usher out rudely anyone who dares to say Lambert is rubbish or not good enough for Queen, they shoot there mouths off without thinking that with out Queen material to sing Lambert would be buggered big time. Lambert fans must have there own web site somewhere to give us real purist Queen fans a rest. We need a rest especially from the same relentless Lambert nutters who keep posting on here day after day as though Lambert pays them for doing so. Queen were a four man British rock band and this is a site to celebrate that, Lambert fans in my opinion are aliens on this site and need to move on like gypsies would be moved from a site. |
rockchic65 08.08.2018 07:41 |
Day dop wrote: rockchic65 wrote "No idea how long ago you left the facebook page but how would you know if they are strictly Lambert fans? I've just been reading the comments and there are loads from Queen fans defending him - they are people who've been Queen fans for years and in many cases saw Freddie live. Others are clearly casual Queen fans who've been to a show and thought it was great. People who don't like this collaboration seem to ignore the obvious since it doesn't fit what they want to believe, but the truth is there are more and more Queen fans giving the shows a go and liking them and Adam and are in a lot of cases the most vocal on there when it comes to telling people who are being downright nasty to get lost." I know they're Lambert fans from observation. I also observed their coordinated attacks day after day upon anyone who said anything about Lambert that they didn't like. I also spoke to other Queen fans who were well aware of what they were doing and had been observing for quite a while. Queen fans even get jumped on for saying "He's no Freddie", let alone Queen fans who outright don't like the collaboration. People who don't like Queen fans sharing their opinion seem to ignore the obvious since it doesn't fit what they want to believe, but the truth is there are a hell of a lot of Queen fans who don't like the collaboration and have every right to voice their views.You're right they do get jumped on for saying that, by ironically Queen fans. There's a few Queen fans, one's who saw Freddie so it's obvious they aren't Glamberts who now get pretty nasty themselves towards anyone calling the collab or Adam and tbh I don't agree with that either. It's one thing to make a point and even disagree in a discussion but some are telling people to shut up and they're talking crap. Maybe originally there were lots of Glamberts I don't know, but from reading there this past year or two there's a hell of a lot of Queen fans arguing. |
rockchic65 08.08.2018 07:43 |
Day dop wrote: I disagree with you about it not being all the Glamberts. It wasn't happening before the collaboration because they weren't on the page.Well even the Queen fans who now like them wouldn't be arguing about it before the collaboration happened. |
rockchic65 08.08.2018 07:52 |
happystar wrote: Lambert fans are some of the most arrogant ass holes i have ever come across, they do not understand if it was not for Freddie forming Queen there "gift from god" would be on his arse somewhere twiddling his fingers! I agree with Day Dop Lambert fans usher out rudely anyone who dares to say Lambert is rubbish or not good enough for Queen, they shoot there mouths off without thinking that with out Queen material to sing Lambert would be buggered big time. Lambert fans must have there own web site somewhere to give us real purist Queen fans a rest. We need a rest especially from the same relentless Lambert nutters who keep posting on here day after day as though Lambert pays them for doing so. Queen were a four man British rock band and this is a site to celebrate that, Lambert fans in my opinion are aliens on this site and need to move on like gypsies would be moved from a site.There's a separate thread where you don't need to read or post and I know this one seems to have got hijacked but for the most part they are separate. If the die hard Queen fans who aren't interested like yourself left the Q+ thread part alone and didn't bother reading there you could have a rest from the relentless posts but you and runner especially choose to keep posting on there and arguing with people who just want to discuss things QAL related. Like it or not whilst this collaboration is ongoing there will be fans of both who want to discuss the shows etc. You're calling Adam's fans but failing to see that by constantly hijacking every Q+ post you're doing exactly what you're accusing them of. |
Day dop 08.08.2018 08:58 |
rockchic65 wrote "you're right they do get jumped on for saying that, by ironically Queen fans. There's a few Queen fans, one's who saw Freddie so it's obvious they aren't Glamberts who now get pretty nasty themselves towards anyone calling the collab or Adam and tbh I don't agree with that either. It's one thing to make a point and even disagree in a discussion but some are telling people to shut up and they're talking crap. Maybe originally there were lots of Glamberts I don't know, but from reading there this past year or two there's a hell of a lot of Queen fans arguing." Queen fans followed that page because they like Queen. And many of them get sick to death of tacky Lambert stuff and "Glamberts" (that sounds so dumb) on the page with their nasty, narrow minded attitude, not being able to accept that people have opinions they don't agree with. If Queen fans are having a pop back now, it's understandable. The whole thing is a mess. It never used to be, but since Lambert, it is. rockchic wrote "There's a separate thread where you don't need to read or post and I know this one seems to have got hijacked but for the most part they are separate. If the die hard Queen fans who aren't interested like yourself left the Q+ thread part alone and didn't bother reading there you could have a rest from the relentless posts but you and runner especially choose to keep posting on there and arguing with people who just want to discuss things QAL related. Like it or not whilst this collaboration is ongoing there will be fans of both who want to discuss the shows etc. You're calling Adam's fans but failing to see that by constantly hijacking every Q+ post you're doing exactly what you're accusing them of. It's not the same thing. I'll explain.... The General and Serious discussion parts of this forum are for Queen threads. The Queen+AL part of the forum is for the Queen+Lambert threads. As for commenting, anyone can go where they like and comment. If there's unhappy or irritated Lambert fans in the Queen+AL part of this forum due to troll-like behaviour, then that's how many Queen fans have been feeling for a long time now. Anyway, there's no point in going around in circles with this. Let's drop the subject of Lambert now, this is the Queen part of the forum, not the Queen+AL part. |
rockchic65 08.08.2018 09:39 |
Day dop wrote: rockchic65 wrote "you're right they do get jumped on for saying that, by ironically Queen fans. There's a few Queen fans, one's who saw Freddie so it's obvious they aren't Glamberts who now get pretty nasty themselves towards anyone calling the collab or Adam and tbh I don't agree with that either. It's one thing to make a point and even disagree in a discussion but some are telling people to shut up and they're talking crap. Maybe originally there were lots of Glamberts I don't know, but from reading there this past year or two there's a hell of a lot of Queen fans arguing." Queen fans followed that page because they like Queen. And many of them get sick to death of tacky Lambert stuff and "Glamberts" (that sounds so dumb) on the page with their nasty, narrow minded attitude, not being able to accept that people have opinions they don't agree with. If Queen fans are having a pop back now, it's understandable. The whole thing is a mess. It never used to be, but since Lambert, it is. rockchic wrote "There's a separate thread where you don't need to read or post and I know this one seems to have got hijacked but for the most part they are separate. If the die hard Queen fans who aren't interested like yourself left the Q+ thread part alone and didn't bother reading there you could have a rest from the relentless posts but you and runner especially choose to keep posting on there and arguing with people who just want to discuss things QAL related. Like it or not whilst this collaboration is ongoing there will be fans of both who want to discuss the shows etc. You're calling Adam's fans but failing to see that by constantly hijacking every Q+ post you're doing exactly what you're accusing them of. It's not the same thing. I'll explain.... The General and Serious discussion parts of this forum are for Queen threads. The Queen+AL part of the forum is for the Queen+Lambert threads. As for commenting, anyone can go where they like and comment. If there's unhappy or irritated Lambert fans in the Queen+AL part of this forum due to troll-like behaviour, then that's how many Queen fans have been feeling for a long time now. Anyway, there's no point in going around in circles with this. Let's drop the subject of Lambert now, this is the Queen part of the forum, not the Queen+AL part.My comment was in reply to Happystar saying he wanted a rest from reading about Lambert and the obvious answer is to avoid reading the Q+ part since he has no interest in it. I personally don't care who reads or posts what or where. As to the facebook thing, when the comment starts with "been a Queen fan for 40 years + and seen Freddie several times" it's safe to assume they aren't a glambert. |
Star* 08.08.2018 10:31 |
Rockchic: This site is called QUEENZONE not QUEEN+ADAM LAMBERT ZONE ! Lambert slaves should respect that! |
rockchic65 08.08.2018 10:51 |
happystar wrote: Rockchic: This site is called QUEENZONE not QUEEN+ADAM LAMBERT ZONE ! Lambert slaves should respect that!The whole site is Queenzone but whoever set up the boards obviously put a Queen + part in it so clearly people will post about the collab there. I get some Queen fans don't like the current line up but others do. Like I said anyone can post wherever they like it just makes no sense to me to keep reading and getting annoyed by posts about the current line up if you aren't into it. And what about Queen fans who now do like this line up like myself? Where are they supposed to read/post and please don't say Lambert fan sites, I really can't face wading through pages of who he clicked like on instagram or whether that particular painting was in this or that room previously, it's all a bit OTT for my tastes and scroll is definitely a friend. |
Star* 08.08.2018 12:04 |
Well if there is any Queen fans who like the Queen + garbage they are not making themselves known on here are they? When Queen had Paul Rodgers with them the Queenzone never got swamped by Paul Rodgers fans, and i respect that. For me Paul was so worthy of playing with Queen because he has a great rock n roll pedigree and Brian & Roger could really rock with him. |
rockchic65 08.08.2018 12:16 |
happystar wrote: Well if there is any Queen fans who like the Queen + garbage they are not making themselves known on here are they? When Queen had Paul Rodgers with them the Queenzone never got swamped by Paul Rodgers fans, and i respect that. For me Paul was so worthy of playing with Queen because he has a great rock n roll pedigree and Brian & Roger could really rock with him.When they do post on here they get shot down or called Glamberts so it's hardly surprising they don't bother all that often. |
Star* 08.08.2018 17:13 |
Rockchic well that does not stop you on here replying back to every post at every minute of the day! You have an answer to everything to make Adam look credible. |
rockchic65 08.08.2018 18:02 |
happystar wrote: Rockchic well that does not stop you on here replying back to every post at every minute of the day! You have an answer to everything to make Adam look credible.Just correcting misinformation aimed at making it seem like only Glamberts could like this collab when that is patently not true. |
Star* 08.08.2018 21:39 |
rockchic that is your opinion but with the lack of Queenzone members contributing to the Lambert threads on here i think most think its boring just like Queen are now. |
rockchic65 08.08.2018 21:52 |
happystar wrote: rockchic that is your opinion but with the lack of Queenzone members contributing to the Lambert threads on here i think most think its boring just like Queen are now.I'm sure there's some who don't like it, some who do like it and some who aren't interested enough to care but there are obviously some Queen fans who are happy with the line up and say so repeatedly on facebook for example so it's far from the case that no Queen fans like it which is what some were trying to imply. |
Star* 09.08.2018 10:08 |
I am sure there is some people who like it just to see May & Taylor live in concert but i do not operate at that low level, its either complete Queen for me or forget it. |
The Fairy King 09.08.2018 12:58 |
Ugh... |
Star* 09.08.2018 13:38 |
I do not do "plastic" i do not do "cheesy" & i certainly do not do "Queen + Adam Lambert" YUK. |
Sealion 09.08.2018 15:07 |
happystar wrote: I do not do "plastic" i do not do "cheesy" & i certainly do not do "Queen + Adam Lambert" YUK.Aha. This forum would be much more enjoyable though, if you wouldn‘t give your opinion on every second post concerning the collaboration. Enjoy Queen, learn to ignore Queen+. The first step would be to stop your daily postings in the Q+ section of this forum. |
Star* 09.08.2018 16:35 |
Sealion Kettle pot black, your always on here spouting off like the other Glamberts because you feel you have an obligation to stop Adam looking like a right tosser. |
Saint Jiub 09.08.2018 21:07 |
Sealion wrote:Excellent advice ...happystar wrote: I do not do "plastic" i do not do "cheesy" & i certainly do not do "Queen + Adam Lambert" YUK.Aha. This forum would be much more enjoyable though, if you wouldn‘t give your opinion on every second post concerning the collaboration. Enjoy Queen, learn to ignore Queen+. The first step would be to stop your daily postings in the Q+ section of this forum. |