RadioDaDa 02.03.2018 17:33 |
So i believe it was in " The Great Pretender " Documentary that Brian said it was because of Paul Prenter that America turned away from queen. . Ive never heard this before he said it. I dont see how that can be possible. |
The Real Wizard 02.03.2018 18:35 |
Pretty easy. Prenter burned all of their bridges in one shot. Every phone call that came in, he said "Freddie doesn't want to talk to you." And there went a decade of building up relationships in the US. There is no shortage of people who worked with Queen who will unequivocally state that Prenter is the worst thing that ever happened to that band. But of course that isn't the only reason Queen had troubles in the US after 1982. |
Sheldon 02.03.2018 18:46 |
I've always understood that Queen consisted of four intelligent individuals, so I don't really buy this whole story. Sure, Prenter was a major piece of shit, but did he really cause all the problems? So ok, "Freddie doesn't want to talk", but how about Brian, wouldn't he become suspicious at some point that none of their contacts are contacting them? Didn't the band have "official" people to be contacted rather than some cunt that Freddie decided to hire to work for him? |
Vocal harmony 02.03.2018 18:51 |
He was one of the official people. He also caused a rift within the organisation, him and Freddie on one side and the other three on the other. |
Queenman!! 02.03.2018 18:55 |
The Real Wizard wrote: Pretty easy. Prenter burned all of their bridges in one shot. Every phone call that came in, he said "Freddie doesn't want to talk to you." And there went a decade of building up relationships in the US. There is no shortage of people who worked with Queen who will unequivocally state that Prenter is the worst thing that ever happened to that band. But of course that isn't the only reason Queen had troubles in the US after 1982.============== Very true Bob. Don’t forget 'the Game' was quite a succes in the US. However the 'Hot Space' album with disco tracks came to soon and when the body language video was released it gave a new meaning to a lot of the tracks of that album which referred to the gay community . The whole of the Us was certainly not ready for this and Hot space went to a disaster in the US . When I want to break free was released with the drag video Queen finally screwed It up.... |
RadioDaDa 02.03.2018 19:16 |
I just find it hard that 1 man ( even tho he was a piece of crap ) would be responsible for that. If every album after the game was hotter than the next in America, it would be impossible for 1 guy to keep the band away from a continent. |
mike hunt 02.03.2018 21:16 |
Prenter was one reason, but far from the main reason. America simply didn't like the new music Queen were releasing. Trust me, if Queen put out another album like The Game it would of been big. No problems....Just Ask Judas Priest how 1 album, in their case Turbo Lover almost ruined their career. It's all about the Quality of the music and not neglecting their fan base. I know Queen went in different directions in their career, but it usually was great until Hot Space. Not the worst album I ever heard, but still not very good. |
people on streets 02.03.2018 23:50 |
RadioDaDa wrote: I just find it hard that 1 man ( even tho he was a piece of crap ) would be responsible for that. If every album after the game was hotter than the next in America, it would be impossible for 1 guy to keep the band away from a continent.Queen is a business. Hiring good personel is vital for any business. That's why companies all have HR these days. And even if you think you hired the right guy, things can go wrong. People are not who you think they are. People can change their behaviour. Next to HR there's a lot of checks and balances in a business. Accountants, lawyers, managers. You wouldn't think one person can bring down a complete business. Right? Are you familiair with the seconds oldest bank in the world and how it was brought down by one man? If not, I suggest you read into 'Nick Leeson' who used to work for Barings Bank. Queen's LPs in the 80s were just fine. Gave them massive hits all over the globe. Paul Prenter was the real problem. Believe it. |
jrd1951 03.03.2018 10:04 |
To me it is pretty obvious.Queen had built up a loyal fan base in the seventies with successful albums and tours ,and then came The Game,which was massive.Two huge singles and a fully sold out tour.As Freddie himself said,the only way from the top of a ladder was down.Similar to Michael Jackson with Thriller,he could never repeat that success with the follow up Bad.Then in 1982 America's favorite front man grew a bushy mustache,cavorted around in leathers and made a disco album.Prenter did have an effect as he was the go to man on USA rock radio stations,and a lot of them no longer played their records.Still good to see Queen's staunch fans buying the albums,as Hot Space,The Works and The Miracle all seem to have sold around the same,just not the general public.So I would say some of it was due tp Prenter,but not all. |
Invisible Woman 03.03.2018 10:53 |
I don't know almost anything about this man, but I don't think that he had so much power over the band and that everyone listened his " orders ". It's impossible. There were other people around the band who decided about many things. |
mooghead 03.03.2018 15:12 |
Homophobia, ignorance and a complete change in musical direction killed Queen in America. IF I had a gun against my head and had to blame ONE person for it then it would have to be Freddie. But fortunately for everyone, he is the one person who couldn't have given a flying fuck. Which I am ok with :-) |
splicksplack 03.03.2018 22:24 |
I know someone who was with the entourage in S America and reckons the demonising of PP is utter crap. I have seen (published) pics of Brian and Roger with PP where they seem to me very matey. My friend thought the world of PP so maybe not an accurate source of info. However, there were 4 equal members of this band plus layers of management. How Fred's personal assistant was responsible for bringing down the band's reputation is a bit of a bloody stretch. I'm not saying that he did't cause problems but in an organisation such as Queen'80 onwards there are checks and balances in place to ensure no one person has that much power. |
splicksplack 03.03.2018 22:25 |
I know someone who was with the entourage in S America and reckons the demonising of PP is utter crap. I have seen (un-published) pics of Brian and Roger with PP where they seem to me very matey. My friend thought the world of PP so maybe not an accurate source of info. However, there were 4 equal members of this band plus layers of management. How Fred's personal assistant was responsible for bringing down the band's reputation is a bit of a bloody stretch. I'm not saying that he did't cause problems but in an organisation such as Queen'80 onwards there are checks and balances in place to ensure no one person has that much power. |
splicksplack 03.03.2018 22:26 |
I know someone who was with the entourage in S America and reckons the demonising of PP is utter crap. I have seen (un-published) pics of Brian and Roger with PP where they seem to me very matey. My friend thought the world of PP so maybe not an accurate source of info. However, there were 4 equal members of this band plus layers of management. How Fred's personal assistant was responsible for bringing down the band's reputation is a bit of a bloody stretch. I'm not saying that he didn't cause problems but in an organisation such as Queen'80 onwards there are checks and balances in place to ensure no one person has that much power. |
splicksplack 03.03.2018 22:26 |
sorry. correcting typos |
Vocal harmony 03.03.2018 23:51 |
The situation with Prenter was not obvious to anyone until midway through the Hot Space period. Even then the extent of the damage caused was really only evident later. JRD1951's view is way off. Freddie was dressing in Leather from 78 not 82 he appeared live with a moustache for the first time in 1980. . . .it was never bushy! Musical direction did have a lot to do with their US downfall. As Roger has said, they weren't "rock enough " for the mid west. But also Prenter made it hard for anyone outside the organisation to contact or reach Freadie. He carefully positioned himself into an area of trust and had influence over Freddie to some degree. There was a time when Prenter was always seen with Freddie both in Queen circles and away from them. Some thought that Prenters goal was to lure Freddie into a personal management situation, he already had some influence on Freddie's solo aspirations. Don't forget that when Prenter was found out and fired, his first port of call was the gutter press. |
Daniel Nester 04.03.2018 00:13 |
This is a letter from Brian May, which originally appeared in News of the World: The Newsletter for Queen Fans. He is attempting to answer the question of whether Queen “gave up” on American fans after the 1982 tour behind the Hot Space album, which failed to go gold. He is addressing the newsletter’s editor, Cola Todd. 26th March 1997 Dear Cola: Now I would like to answer the Big Question that you ask. America was our great pride and joy as we grew of age as a band. Throughout the late 70s we worked very hard, touring many months of every year, and a large proportion of that time was spent in the States. I guess we took pride in the fact that every time we came back, usually with another album on the shelves, the response got bigger and bigger. We felt that we were earning our wings, as it were, and that the following we had was a genuine word-of-mouth thing, based on the uniqueness of the Queen shows, etc. We also put in time at Radio when we were passing through, particularly Roger and I, so that there was a continuing direct connection between us and the public. As far as I can tell, a number of things happened with the last Queen U.S. tour: 1) The Hot Space album was perceived by Radio as Queen forsaking Rock and Roll for Disco – out timing was perhaps a little premature, which was evident when you compare with material with what Michael Jackson was to be doing with Ed Van Halen and Slash in years to come. 2) Relations with Radio was not taken care of – we had a new man in charge of Promotion on the road, who, unknown to us at the time, was very high handed and rude with the media people and gave them the impression that we no longer cared. We only later discovered the huge extent of the damage much later, when trying to get Freddie’s solo record played. There was great resentment (radio people, like the rest of us, need to feel loved, and important!), and word of mouth on our tour was distorted by people who now wanted to see us fail. 3) We got caught in the crossfire of an attempt by Capital Records to withdraw from the Independent Promotion Circus (a.k.a. Payola) which dominated radio plays at that time. Capital dropped the man who was the lynch pin of their connection with the network of the radio station bribery, and the next week, 95 per cent of radio stations dropped our record, Radio Ga Ga. You can check this out in the record books. There was also the convenient rumours that the lyrics of the song were demeaning to Radio programmers, so there was a handy excuse available. Capital had been made an example of, by those in control, and we were the instrument. 4) We made a video in drag, as a spoof on a soap series, which was viewed as very funny, and something of an innovation, in Europe, but to the media in the U.S., it was seen as a threat to Morality. Yes, seriously – I was around to see the reaction of the TV people first-hand – they were horrified! Again, some of the media were looking for fuel for the fires of hatred (or at least distrust!), and a Homophobic undertone that further undermined Queen’s image in the U.S. The rest of the world did not seem to find this a problem. Which brings us to: 5) When the question of touring came up, we always looked at reactions to our latest album around the world. There was a massive explosion of interest in most of the countries of South America, in Africa, in the East, in Eastern Europe, and part of Western Europe which had been slow in the early days while were enjoying great recognition in North America. It made sense (and fun!) to go touring in the countries where there was growth and even hysteria, rather than flogging a Dead Horse in the US, where we felt there was a tide of something which for our interests and purposes was not dissimilar to McCarthyism which has driven the previous generation’s artists out. And there was a stubborn streak in Freddie, it has to be said, which was determined not to go back anywhere where we would be SMALLER then we had been before. Having toured football stadiums in most of the civilized world, it would have been depressing to go back to the U.S. and do theatres – or at least Freddie was adamant that this was so. To be honest, without this insistence we probably would have eaten humble pie and gone back, as Elton did, and with respect all over again. But in the event, the decision was to wait. For a renaissance that never came. I guess I was eager to show my feelings later; my blind faith in touring my own Brian May Band in the States, was a nice reaffirmation that we have loyal fans and great friends, but a disastrous demonstration of how little the word spread, and how-to-lose-a-lot-of-money-very-quickly! It was also very hard for me to keep up morale of my band, playing a show designed for fair-sized arenas to audiences in tiny clubs. So you see, we did not really give up the U.S.A. without a fight – we just postponed it, in hopes that the Right Time would come. We certainly dreamed, the quality of Made in Heaven being acclaimed so highly, and sales around the world being so phenomenal, that America would respond after Freddie’s death if not before. But it was not meant to be. I guess we just didn’t play the necessary games. Or maybe it’s in the Future…! But I doubt it. Music becomes a huge part of people’s emotional life, but always at the moment when it is ringing in the ears everywhere. There is a huge chunk of Queen music which rang from Budapest to Buenos Aires to Beijing, but was silent in America. That can never be changed now. But there are people like yourselves who tuned in regardless, and all I can say is “Thanks Folks!” - Brian May |
RadioDaDa 04.03.2018 11:51 |
Great stuff Daniel. Thank you. |
RadioDaDa 04.03.2018 11:51 |
Great stuff Daniel. Thank you. |
master marathon runner 04.03.2018 12:23 |
Cheers Daniel. - Just about the most valuable insight as to where it turned bad. |
Star* 04.03.2018 16:16 |
Brian stated in tv documentary that the band never liked where Paul Prenter was leading Freddie too around all the nasty cheap bars and pubs where Freddie could be in grave danger. Brian Roger & John did despise Paul Prenter. |
Queenman!! 04.03.2018 17:34 |
Daniel Nester wrote: This is a letter from Brian May, which originally appeared in News of the World: The Newsletter for Queen Fans. He is attempting to answer the question of whether Queen “gave up” on American fans after the 1982 tour behind the Hot Space album, which failed to go gold. He is addressing the newsletter’s editor, Cola Todd. 26th March 1997 Dear Cola: Now I would like to answer the Big Question that you ask. America was our great pride and joy as we grew of age as a band. Throughout the late 70s we worked very hard, touring many months of every year, and a large proportion of that time was spent in the States. I guess we took pride in the fact that every time we came back, usually with another album on the shelves, the response got bigger and bigger. We felt that we were earning our wings, as it were, and that the following we had was a genuine word-of-mouth thing, based on the uniqueness of the Queen shows, etc. We also put in time at Radio when we were passing through, particularly Roger and I, so that there was a continuing direct connection between us and the public. As far as I can tell, a number of things happened with the last Queen U.S. tour: 1) The Hot Space album was perceived by Radio as Queen forsaking Rock and Roll for Disco – out timing was perhaps a little premature, which was evident when you compare with material with what Michael Jackson was to be doing with Ed Van Halen and Slash in years to come. 2) Relations with Radio was not taken care of – we had a new man in charge of Promotion on the road, who, unknown to us at the time, was very high handed and rude with the media people and gave them the impression that we no longer cared. We only later discovered the huge extent of the damage much later, when trying to get Freddie’s solo record played. There was great resentment (radio people, like the rest of us, need to feel loved, and important!), and word of mouth on our tour was distorted by people who now wanted to see us fail. 3) We got caught in the crossfire of an attempt by Capital Records to withdraw from the Independent Promotion Circus (a.k.a. Payola) which dominated radio plays at that time. Capital dropped the man who was the lynch pin of their connection with the network of the radio station bribery, and the next week, 95 per cent of radio stations dropped our record, Radio Ga Ga. You can check this out in the record books. There was also the convenient rumours that the lyrics of the song were demeaning to Radio programmers, so there was a handy excuse available. Capital had been made an example of, by those in control, and we were the instrument. 4) We made a video in drag, as a spoof on a soap series, which was viewed as very funny, and something of an innovation, in Europe, but to the media in the U.S., it was seen as a threat to Morality. Yes, seriously – I was around to see the reaction of the TV people first-hand – they were horrified! Again, some of the media were looking for fuel for the fires of hatred (or at least distrust!), and a Homophobic undertone that further undermined Queen’s image in the U.S. The rest of the world did not seem to find this a problem. Which brings us to: 5) When the question of touring came up, we always looked at reactions to our latest album around the world. There was a massive explosion of interest in most of the countries of South America, in Africa, in the East, in Eastern Europe, and part of Western Europe which had been slow in the early days while were enjoying great recognition in North America. It made sense (and fun!) to go touring in the countries where there was growth and even hysteria, rather than flogging a Dead Horse in the US, where we felt there was a tide of something which for our interests and purposes was not dissimilar to McCarthyism which has driven the previous generation’s artists out. And there was a stubborn streak in Freddie, it has to be said, which was determined not to go back anywhere where we would be SMALLER then we had been before. Having toured football stadiums in most of the civilized world, it would have been depressing to go back to the U.S. and do theatres – or at least Freddie was adamant that this was so. To be honest, without this insistence we probably would have eaten humble pie and gone back, as Elton did, and with respect all over again. But in the event, the decision was to wait. For a renaissance that never came. I guess I was eager to show my feelings later; my blind faith in touring my own Brian May Band in the States, was a nice reaffirmation that we have loyal fans and great friends, but a disastrous demonstration of how little the word spread, and how-to-lose-a-lot-of-money-very-quickly! It was also very hard for me to keep up morale of my band, playing a show designed for fair-sized arenas to audiences in tiny clubs. So you see, we did not really give up the U.S.A. without a fight – we just postponed it, in hopes that the Right Time would come. We certainly dreamed, the quality of Made in Heaven being acclaimed so highly, and sales around the world being so phenomenal, that America would respond after Freddie’s death if not before. But it was not meant to be. I guess we just didn’t play the necessary games. Or maybe it’s in the Future…! But I doubt it. Music becomes a huge part of people’s emotional life, but always at the moment when it is ringing in the ears everywhere. There is a huge chunk of Queen music which rang from Budapest to Buenos Aires to Beijing, but was silent in America. That can never be changed now. But there are people like yourselves who tuned in regardless, and all I can say is “Thanks Folks!” - Brian May---------------------------------------------------------- yes spot on! Brian forgot the Body Language was banned in the US by MTV due to sexual content. Well great to know my memory isn't that bad ... now I can sleep well.... :) |
Sheldon 05.03.2018 11:57 |
It's funny when Trump says something like this, or in a way like this, people go crazy mocking him, but when Brian does it no-one bats an eye :D "We certainly dreamed, the quality of Made in Heaven being acclaimed so highly, and sales around the world being so phenomenal, that America would respond after Freddie’s death if not before." |
runner_70 05.03.2018 12:06 |
How can Brians statement be compared to Trumps drivel???? |
RadioDaDa 05.03.2018 12:30 |
Happystar— we all know how most felt about Preter. In all honest if he didn’t run to the tabloids with the hurtful stories for $$$ I don’t think he would be as hated. The forum was mostly on explaining Brian’s comments about Prenter being almost the sole reason queen lost America. |
Tattermalion 05.03.2018 15:44 |
In the book 'Somebody to Love', it suggests no tours in the USA for The Works or AKOM because Freddie wouldn't get the health insurance required for the US. |
Daniel Nester 05.03.2018 16:34 |
I saw that mention in Somebody to Love, and thought it was interesting albeit lightly sourced. I suspect Freddie could have figured out a way to out-wing the insurance people if he truly wanted to tour North America. When I re-read this letter and hear Brian talking about the 'huge chunk of Queen music which rang from Budapest to Buenos Aires to Beijing, but was silent in America' and 'can never be changed,' I remember the QPR and QAL tours and how responsive crowds were to WWTLF and TATDOOL and other tracks, and hope he feels differently now about re-framing the band's legacy in North America. I know I do, and never thought I'd see the way where Brian and Roger would be playing something like "I Want It All" on Jimmy Kimmel and people losing their minds, cheering. |
FunLovinCriminal 17.03.2018 15:24 |
Not sure if Freddie really wanted cheat on the insurance company covering the Magic Tour. Imagine what would have been happening if there really would have been an accident that might have forced him to be taken care of in a hospital in the US. Him already showing signs of KS would have made doctors suspicious that he might have been suffering from AIDS right there and then. Brian's comments on Indie Promo Men (aka Payola) makes a lot of sense as an explanation of the US being turned away from Queen. When Pink Floyd started their first run of The Wall-shows in LA, somebody at CBS records, their label in the US then, refused to pay those promo-criminals for their "services" in having Another Brick In The Wall on heavy radio-rotation, which caused some confusion among the Pink Floyd-management. Just as the band started to roll into LA, no radio station in the area was playing their big hit. The band's manager cried foul, the promo guys were payed and the tune was back on the radio. Having said that, I really don't think that any of the tracks on Hot Space would have really appealed to Americans at the time. The tracks from that album were just not good enough to appeal to either the "black music“ market nor the mainstream market. Regarding Paul Prenter: Freddie was intelligent enough to have Prenter get in the way of him communicating with the band and its management. It might have been Freddie himself who told Prenter to tell the US-radio to fuck off, as it's well known that he wasn't really into doing intrerview - to be putting it mildly. |
The Real Wizard 18.03.2018 23:13 |
runner_70 wrote: How can Brians statement be compared to Trumps drivel????Because a lot of people are really, really stupid. |
The Real Wizard 18.03.2018 23:13 |
RadioDaDa wrote: Happystar— we all know how most felt about Preter. In all honest if he didn’t run to the tabloids with the hurtful stories for $$$ I don’t think he would be as hated. The forum was mostly on explaining Brian’s comments about Prenter being almost the sole reason queen lost America.Even without the tabloid episode, he is still the worst thing that ever happened to Queen. |
The Real Wizard 18.03.2018 23:16 |
FunLovinCriminal wrote: Regarding Paul Prenter: Freddie was intelligent enough to have Prenter get in the way of him communicating with the band and its management.Plenty of people who were there would say otherwise. Prenter had Mercury in the palm of his hand. He introduced Mercury to the gay club scene, giving him the freedom he so deeply craved. Even the band came second place to it. It tore them apart for years. The band finally had an intervention with him after Live Aid, saying "it's him or us", and we all know which one he picked. |
Saint Jiub 19.03.2018 00:19 |
The Real Wizard wrote:Can you please elaborate on this and provide a reference?FunLovinCriminal wrote: Regarding Paul Prenter: Freddie was intelligent enough to have Prenter get in the way of him communicating with the band and its management.Plenty of people who were there would say otherwise. Prenter had Mercury in the palm of his hand. He introduced Mercury to the gay club scene, giving him the freedom he so deeply craved. Even the band came second place to it. It tore them apart for years. The band finally had an intervention with him after Live Aid, saying "it's him or us", and we all know which one he picked. I have wondered whether the fear of AIDs or a positive HIV test had helped prod Freddie to suddenly abandon Munich and settle down with Jim at the Garden Lodge. |
FunLovinCriminal 19.03.2018 21:35 |
I'm very sorry for having forgotten a NOT: Freddie being intelligent enough to have Prenter NOT geting in the way... |
FunLovinCriminal 19.03.2018 21:38 |
btw, nobody gives one any freedom. Either you take it yourself or you're having none of it. The "him or us"-intervention is news to me. Can someone send a reference, please? |
Apocalipsis_Darko 20.03.2018 05:21 |
Well, Queen were again famous in USA in 1992 with Bohemian Rhapsody (for wayne's world) charted number 2, Classic Queen charted 4 and Greatest hits red charted 11. I spoke about that with Peter Paterno. BR, CQ and GHR are facts. Also, in the recent years, by "artists" like Lady Ga Ga or Lambert Queen is again on the radar. Chris Cornell said to me, Freddie Mercury was the best singer of rock. Well, Chris Cornell was, and is a legend in USA. Rest in peace Chris. |
Apocalipsis_Darko 20.03.2018 05:22 |
And also we can say, Stranger things, the most famous serie of this last two years, aired a song of Queen. |
RadioDaDa 20.03.2018 12:10 |
Apo-darko- Yes in 92’ that movie put queen back on the USA map with a new generation who didn’t know much about Queen at a young age. And yes today there are queen songs everywhere you turn around here. But the forum was about the lack of popularity in the 80’s after the game album and the reasons for it. |
Apocalipsis_Darko 20.03.2018 16:47 |
OK RadioDaDa, sorry! |
RadioDaDa 20.03.2018 18:15 |
No need to get snippy. Just speaking about the facts |
The Real Wizard 20.03.2018 21:10 |
Panchgani wrote:I wish I remember where I read this. It was years ago. But it was someone pretty close to the band who told the story. That much I remember.The Real Wizard wrote:Can you please elaborate on this and provide a reference? I have wondered whether the fear of AIDs or a positive HIV test had helped prod Freddie to suddenly abandon Munich and settle down with Jim at the Garden Lodge.FunLovinCriminal wrote: Regarding Paul Prenter: Freddie was intelligent enough to have Prenter get in the way of him communicating with the band and its management.Plenty of people who were there would say otherwise. Prenter had Mercury in the palm of his hand. He introduced Mercury to the gay club scene, giving him the freedom he so deeply craved. Even the band came second place to it. It tore them apart for years. The band finally had an intervention with him after Live Aid, saying "it's him or us", and we all know which one he picked. Also - look at the 1986 crew photo. No Prenter. He was there from 77-85. The timeline adds up. |
9kat5 16.12.2018 00:53 |
I was fortunate enough to have seen Queen at Madison Square Garden. From up high in the rafters, we were poor newlyweds at the time, but we were there. As a Queen fan from Texas who was in the key demographic, I guess you cld say, at the time (grad from high school in 77, from college in 82 (five-year plan lol) - I was surprised to read that Queen apparently fell out of favor in America in the early 80's -?? Huh?? Not with my friends! I do remember the "new" Freddie with the moustache was not popular with some. In my memory, the rumors of Freddie being gay and his new look were simultaneous, and the particular look Freddie chose was equivalent, at least in America, to saying "I am gay." And not only gay, but "women need not apply," was the understood purpose of adopting that particular look. Freddie being gay, by itself, I can assure you, would have been a non-issue. There was already David Bowie and Mick Jagger, who we all assumed slept with everything that moved, which, if anything, enhanced their images, at least with my (Dallas area) crowd. If Freddie had allowed himself to be known as bisexual or gay, but kept either his earlier Killer Queen look, or his later 70's shorter hair/no moustache look, Freddie being bisexual or gay would have had zero negative impact on love from the TX college crowd, and, as I say, might have even enhanced love from the TX college crowd. I still loved Queen and Freddie, moustache or not, we spent money we didn't really have to travel and see them, I loved Freddie's voice, energy, the music of Queen, the Freddie-ness of Freddie. I did like his pre1980 look better, but Freddie was and remains Freddie to me (and to most, but not all, of my friends at the time). So I am always surprised when I read that Freddie tried to "hide" his sexuality - to us, his moustached look, that particular style of moustache combined with that specific haircut - he might as well have been wearing a t-shirt saying "I'm Gay" - it was exactly the same thing and, again, the trouble with some in the fandom was not that Freddie was gay, it was that that particular look was interpreted as "I'm gay, and all you women out there, you need not apply" - that was more the problem. It meant Freddie didn't want half of the fanbase, the problem was not (ever!) that half of the fanbase didn't want Freddie, if this makes sense. And again, I didn't feel that way, I ate pb&j for dinner for a month to see them. I saw the Live Aid show (on tv), and I remember at the time thinking, with some bewilderment, is Queen trying out their new stuff during their Live Aid show -?! Although by the time of Live Aid I was immersed in the early years of corporate jungle-gym climbing, I didn't that I was *that out of touch. I remember thinking what was all this "ga ga, goo goo" just what the heck is going on?? I very specifically remember thinking, stop playing this, and start playing Seven Seas of Rhye (my second fav Queen song), while we were all clapping along anyway lol. And what song was in my head after - that's right - Radio GaGa. Queen Forever! |
Martin Packer 16.12.2018 20:27 |
@9kat5 He DID wear the t-shirt: Mineshaft. :-) |
Sweetandtenderhooligan 16.12.2018 23:12 |
I always remember Jim's description of Prenter being shifty and always darting his eyes around the room watching everyone who walked in. No wonder he gave him the creeps. You could see just how obsessed with Freddie he was at the Munich birthday party. |
dysan 18.12.2018 08:01 |
bump |
FunLovinCriminal 19.12.2018 22:13 |
It's interesting how often comparisons are drawn between Hot Space and Thriller. I'm nowhere near liking Jichael Mackson, but there is just no question that a lot more work and quality-control went into the making of Thriller. Hot Space sounds cheap and half-assed compared to Quincy Jones's monumental production. Thriller's songs are cheesy, for sure. But the songs on Hot Space are much worse. Body Language, anyone? It's just cheap. I also can't hear the blabla over and over again that Hot Space was music made for gay clubs. Music in gay clubs at that time was moving towards samples, loops and Electronica. There was certainly no use for the kind of pseudo-funk that Queen was coming up with. |
Blackvy 19.12.2018 23:08 |
@FunLovinCriminal Good point. |
Dim 20.12.2018 10:41 |
I believe that MJ influenced by Queen in terms of inserting some rock heaviness in his songs. He might be influenced by Another one bites the dust, dragon attack and some renditions of hot space songs like Staying power and back chat. But not in terms of music production, writing or choosing his songs for Thriller. Interesting thing is that the 12'' remix intro of Pain is so close to pleasure is very similar with his 87-88 hit The way you make me feel. |
Dim 20.12.2018 10:46 |
I believe that MJ influenced by Queen in terms of inserting some rock heaviness in his songs. He might be influenced by Another one bites the dust, dragon attack and some renditions of hot space songs like Staying power and back chat. But not in terms of music production, writing or choosing his songs for Thriller. Interesting thing is that the 12'' remix intro of Pain is so close to pleasure is very similar with his 87-88 hit The way you make me feel. I remember once answered a letter during 90s stating the reasons why Queen lost America, he wrote about a record industry retail "Scandal", MTV banning IWTBF, No touring US, the big gap between Album and The European tour was about US dates. Last he mentioned PR problems caused by Paul. |
miraclesteinway 20.12.2018 12:15 |
Perhaps MJ was influenced by The Game, but I doubt he'd have been much influenced by Hot Space. Hot Space wasn't ahead of its time at all, if anything it sounded slightly dated even when it was released. It wasn't post-modern, it wasn't funk, it wasn't much. I'm not saying Hot Space was altogether terrible, but it was weak. News of the World was for me really strong, Jazz was OK, and The Game sounded like Queen making a musical comeback. Then they put out Hot Space which is just not as good. It's without direction. There are some nice moments on it - Under Pressure is a great song, and I like Put out the Fire. There are some which just fall short of being great in my opinion like Cool Cat, Staying Power, and there are some which are just dire like Dancer and Body Language. Action This Day is OK, and sounds more like what was actually going on in 1982 than the rest of it. I think had Queen toured America they'd have had some more success there, and perhaps if they'd taken advice and made a different video for Break Free for the USA they might have had more luck. Yes, homophobia sucks, but unfortunately it was the spirit of the time in the USA - they weren't ready for it. We've been dragging up in the UK for 300 years, and America never had that proud history. I think Brian May's 1997 assessment of what went on in America is largely right. A host of things didn't help them, there wasn't one thing that screwed it up for them but a clusterfuck of things went wrong. The irony of Wayne's World is that the decision to include Bohemian Rhapsody happened before Freddie Mercury died - it's likely that Mike Myers didn't even realise just how sick Freddie was at that time if he thought of it at all - and had Freddie not been ill and they had been able to tour, Wayne's World would have really helped Queen reignite America. As it was, they couldn't tour. Let's not forget too that at the time Freddie died, the press weren't all that nice to him in either country. The British press had a field day describing him as an outrageous bed-hopping bisexual rather than focusing on his music, and America is the country of God Hates Fags, something that was far more prevalent in 1991 than it is today, even if a quick tour round YouTube conspiracy videos makes it seem like America thinks we all have some gay agenda to push..... |
FunLovinCriminal 20.12.2018 16:09 |
At the end of the day, who really cares whether Queen lost America up to the mid-80's, or America lost Queen? By then all of them were multi millionaires - what the fuck were they complaining about? Their egos perhaps. Had Paul Prenter written Hot Space? Queen had a manager, Queen had proper PR in America, Queen had professional tour-promoters in America. The fact that they had lost America must not necessarily been due to the ideas Mr May had about the fact. Their music was just not to the liking of the Americans at that time. That happens. As far as the homophobia ist concerned: If the Americans actually had a problem with gayness, why did they took to Culture Club wholeheartedly at around the same time the Break Free-video had been made? If a band which thinks it's great fails, it usually blames everybody else, apart from itself. I am gay, I am 52, I remember the 80's as a decade in which people by and large opened up to lesbians and gays step by step. AIDS gave the moralists, the TV evangelists, Mr Reagen and Mrs Thatcher a field day, but it also informed some empathy towards gay men which in the 90's turned into embracing „gay culture“ (if there is such a thing). Freddie had a lot of power in terms of publicity, but he decided to not use it to fight the bigots. He could have. But then, he did wear the Mineshaft-shirt in a video, he looked exceptionally gay, he behaved gay, he did hint on his gayness in interviews. I don't even think that the public on either side of the world was then thinking that he was straight. It just didn't matter, did it? We could go on and on and... on the subject. But, people, please, Prenter didn't open up the gay world for Freddie. He might have been a henchman, but Freddie indulged the gay world, because he had already defined himself as being gay. And he wouldn't have acted differently if there had not been a Paul Prenter. If Freddie really accepted himself or if his sexual appetite was a substitute for the lack of self-acceptance is a different question... |
miraclesteinway 20.12.2018 18:31 |
Actually I totally agree with that. |
whoman89 20.12.2018 19:29 |
I've never really understood America reacting badly to the drag in I want to Break Free. They loved Monty Python and they were dressing up in womens clothing long before Queen were even a thing. |
Vocal harmony 21.12.2018 08:52 |
whoman89 wrote: I've never really understood America reacting badly to the drag in I want to Break Free. They loved Monty Python and they were dressing up in womens clothing long before Queen were even a thing.Monty Python was originally a comedy sketch show then later movies. They dressed for comedy effect or to act as characters. Queen through the 70's were a rock band and still had a rock fan base into the 80's although their audience had expanded and become more diverse by then. Middle America and maybe some of the southern states reacted to Queen in a negative way because as Roger said in an old interview it was viewed as not Rock enough |
FunLovinCriminal 22.12.2018 00:49 |
The strong cultural force in the American South is Evangelical Christianity. Whether it was Queen-rock or Twisted Sister-rock or Frank Zappa-rock, it was ROCK and the work of the devil. You might laugh, I do too. But let's remember that Beatles-records had been thrown into a bonfire, when John Lennon's remark that the Beatles seemed to be „more popular than Jesus“ got totally misused by the KKK. My point is that a rock band never really sold many records in the bible belt or in Missouri. The west and east coast-cities had always been the cultural hot spots in America and the most records had been and are still being sold in NYC, LA, Boston, Philadelphia, San Francisco and so forth. Many english bands such as Jethro Tull, Genesis, Yes, Judas Priest and many more had their moments in America, and all of them had to downsize their tours from Arenas to Theaters. But they did! And they never stopped touring America. Queen in their infinite arrogance feared downsizing their audiences in the US. And then Taylor and May started bemoaning „losing America“. Freddie never did. Probably for a good reason. He just couldn't tour the US anymore because of special insurance policies for HIV-infected people. Either way, whether or not their popularity was waning in the US, what the fuck were they complaining about? They filled large outdoor-venues in 1986. And Freddie just couldn't tour anymore after the Magic Tour. Mays and Taylors attempt to clean the image of Queen with the movie seems to work. They have a huge US-tour ahead of them. Fine for them, but I can't withhold the feeling that they sacrificed their legacy for that. At least they successfully twisted it. If they were courageous, they should perform Break Free in drag. But that humorous phase of the band had died with Freddie. |
9kat5 23.12.2018 06:34 |
@Martin Packer - Yes, he did and the Heaven t-shirt as well :) Not hiding anything, and no need to hide anything. @FunLovinCriminal - Yes, your description of America in the 80's and 90's regarding the growing acceptance, empathy due to AIDS, and then even greater acceptance, of the gay community gets it precisely right. I don't know if you, like me, were around back then, but as a now 59 yo grandma, I can say that, as I did in my earlier post, Freddie's gayness would have been a non-issue. And I was then a college student in the *Dallas area - aka the "buckle" of the Bible Belt. Some of my friends didn't like the mustache/short haircut look Freddie adopted. But we loved, LOVED the music. Lots of metal, lots of rock fans in the Texas college crowd. Millions of Texas rock and metal fans. Queen could have filled Reunion Arena or the Convention Center in Dallas throughout the 80's. I didn't hear that Queen supposedly "lost" America until this new movie came out. My reaction remains, "Huh?" At no time, including after Freddie changed his look which was pretty much equivalent to announcing "I am gay," was there a backlash against Queen, at least not among my crowd. We were mildly surprised to discover Freddie Mercury was gay, wished he would grow his hair back and lose the moustache, then cranked their music up and wanted more Queen. This is my memory of my reaction and my friends' reactions. We just didn't care, though had Freddie asked us lol, we wld have said "shave the moustache off please Freddie" but since Freddie liked it, and, most importantly, since he continued to be Freddie, with all the gloriousness of Freddie, and since Queen continued to be Queen, Freddie being gay barely registered. We assumed rock stars slept around - Mick Jagger, Aerosmith, David Bowie - androgyny was in! I hope somehow Brian, Roger, and John read these forums. I really want them to know - there were plenty, millions and millions and millions, of American fans who never turned their backs on Queen. Ever. We would have gone to concerts. We never heard Radio GaGa or I Want to Break Free on our American radio when those songs were released. I don't know why they were not played on Amerucan radio stations. We would have loved those songs. Something else happened, it was not American youth rejecting Queen. The American college crowd never rejected Queen. And if I can say that from my college vantage point in 80's Texas, I think my experience was pretty much repeated throughout the land, not just on the coasts. Had Queen toured, the arenas would have been full throughout America. |
FunLovinCriminal 23.12.2018 22:11 |
@9kat5 - Many thanks for your memories of the standing of Queen among your friends in 80's America. The reason why you hadn't heard GaGa or Break Free on the radio is probably due to Capitol Records at that time refusing to buy the „services“ of Indie Promo Men. I could elaborate on that, but let's just say that the airwaves over on your side of the planet were full of songs that were only played because record companies payed dubious characters which „mysteriously made“ some songs hits and some failures. I never bought into the idea that Jim Beach would have tolerated Queen not being played on US radio. He would have forced Capitol Records to pay the Indie Criminals. I also never believed that Queen had „lost America" due to the actions of Paul Prenter. They simply should have continued touring, but Freddies HIV-status just simply did not allow him to travel to and in the US. On the other hand, the cultural climate in your country would have made it rather easy for Freddie at that time to appear rather subversive. Remember was the heyday of Pat Robertson, Jim and Tammy Baker, Jimmy Swaggart and all the other Televangelist-criminals. They created a climate of hate and division, their false faith made it easy for the PMRC to having had their appetite for censorship. And, let's not forget Ronald Reagen got into office with the financial help of Televengalists. In return he had to stand up for a lot of their racist ideals. Officially there was no support coming from the Reagen administration towards Gay Mens Health Crisis or any other organisation taking care of people infected with HIV. In Middle-America gay boys and men were, in fact, witch hunted. It was only in the big cities that the situation for gay men living in fear turned slowly to the better in the late 80's. Freddie had by that time not officially declared to having been gay. But, as you rightly stated, he looked as if he could have been in the Village People. Funnily, at the time of Live Aid his clone-appearance looked incredibly dated, I thought. But it was his way of looking manly. To me he never looked better than a little later, around the time of The Miracle, when he had that scruff. Anyway, enjoy your holiday! |
runner_70 23.12.2018 22:58 |
FunLovinCriminal wrote: They simply should have continued touring, but Freddies HIV-status just simply did not allow him to travel to and in the US.In 1984 Freddie did not know anything about his HIV status so he could have travelled to the US without any problem. It is also the frist time that I heard that HUIV positive people were not allowed to travel?!?! But as I said Freddie could have toured the US but they refused as The Works flopped in the US |
FunLovinCriminal 24.12.2018 13:56 |
They could have while on the Magic Tour, post Live Aid and didn't. People with HIV were allowed to travel, of course. But US-insurance companies were asking for HIV-tests of members of touring bands by that time... |
Vocal harmony 24.12.2018 14:09 |
9kat5 wrote: @Martin Packer - Yes, he did and the Heaven t-shirt as well :) Not hiding anything, and no need to hide anything. @FunLovinCriminal - Yes, your description of America in the 80's and 90's regarding the growing acceptance, empathy due to AIDS, and then even greater acceptance, of the gay community gets it precisely right. I don't know if you, like me, were around back then, but as a now 59 yo grandma, I can say that, as I did in my earlier post, Freddie's gayness would have been a non-issue. And I was then a college student in the *Dallas area - aka the "buckle" of the Bible Belt. Some of my friends didn't like the mustache/short haircut look Freddie adopted. But we loved, LOVED the music. Lots of metal, lots of rock fans in the Texas college crowd. Millions of Texas rock and metal fans. Queen could have filled Reunion Arena or the Convention Center in Dallas throughout the 80's. I didn't hear that Queen supposedly "lost" America until this new movie came out. My reaction remains, "Huh?" At no time, including after Freddie changed his look which was pretty much equivalent to announcing "I am gay," was there a backlash against Queen, at least not among my crowd. We were mildly surprised to discover Freddie Mercury was gay, wished he would grow his hair back and lose the moustache, then cranked their music up and wanted more Queen. This is my memory of my reaction and my friends' reactions. We just didn't care, though had Freddie asked us lol, we wld have said "shave the moustache off please Freddie" but since Freddie liked it, and, most importantly, since he continued to be Freddie, with all the gloriousness of Freddie, and since Queen continued to be Queen, Freddie being gay barely registered. We assumed rock stars slept around - Mick Jagger, Aerosmith, David Bowie - androgyny was in! I hope somehow Brian, Roger, and John read these forums. I really want them to know - there were plenty, millions and millions and millions, of American fans who never turned their backs on Queen. Ever. We would have gone to concerts. We never heard Radio GaGa or I Want to Break Free on our American radio when those songs were released. I don't know why they were not played on Amerucan radio stations. We would have loved those songs. Something else happened, it was not American youth rejecting Queen. The American college crowd never rejected Queen. And if I can say that from my college vantage point in 80's Texas, I think my experience was pretty much repeated throughout the land, not just on the coasts. Had Queen toured, the arenas would have been full throughout America.Interesting reading this, however I find it hard to agree with your last line about the band filling arenas had they toured, I don't think they would. Around The Game they were huge and concert ticket sales reflected that. By 1982 things had changed, Hot Space sales were down on The Game and ticket sales were too. In the States they weren't selling out anywhere near the number they previously had. The two strongest venues that they played historically LA Forum and Madison Square Garden sold less tickets and they played fewer nights at both. The ticket sales decline was happening although you like a lot of people may not gab been aware of it. The Works tour was scheduled to start in The States but although venues were lined up, although fewer and smaller than before, the tour was pulled before it was advertised. Brian actually said on a US phone in radio show that they were about to announce dates, and would be visiting the town of the person he was talking to during a phone conversation. My understanding is that the promoters were not prepared to shoulder the cost of not filling the big arenas. Freddie saw playing smaller and fewer venues as a step backwards so America was lost |
FunLovinCriminal 24.12.2018 15:04 |
But, see, „lost“ is not a fitting term, because they could have toured there, had they been prepared for performing in smaller venues. Lost would apply if actually no one had been interested in them anymore, which was not the case. Any touring band experienced highs and lows in ticket sales, apart from the Rolling Stones, perhaps. But they are doing what Taylor and May are doing right now - they're cashing in, but are irrelevant as an artistic force. |
The Real Wizard 28.12.2018 05:51 |
9kat5 wrote: Queen could have filled Reunion Arena or the Convention Center in Dallas throughout the 80's. I didn't hear that Queen supposedly "lost" America until this new movie came out.The band (particularly Brian) has spoken about it at great length over the years. It's mentioned in the Days Of Our Lives documentary. We never heard Radio Ga Ga or I Want to Break Free on our American radio when those songs were released. I don't know why they were not played on Amerucan radio stations.Largely because of a payola scandal involving Capitol Records, and Radio Ga Ga got caught in the middle of it. But it did get some airplay. Also - Queen's contacts with radio stations were severed around that time by Paul Prenter. It took a decade to build up those relationships, and Prenter sabotaged them in a matter of weeks while he was simultaneously trying to influence Mercury to leave Queen. 1980 saw them playing 3 nights at MSG and 4 at the LA Forum. In 1982 it was 2 nights at each. By 1984, without the guarantee of radio to promote them, they would've had to do theatres while they were doing stadiums elsewhere. As someone said above, ticket sales were dwindling and promoters didn't want to lose their shirts. So the band cut their losses and moved on. |
Russian Headlong 2 05.04.2020 23:13 |
Prenter may have had some influence but the fact was Queen lost their Heavy Rock sound from the Game and Hot Space. The States saw them as a Hard Rock band and the 80's releases saw mainly 'pop' and 'dance' tracks on albums. IWTBF video drag so what? Hair Metal was built on MTV most of those bands look liked transvestites but they rocked unlike Hot Space, Radio Ga Ga which are pure pop, so I don't but the image as the problem it was the sound! Rob Halford was always in your face gay but the metal and hard rock fans overlooked his obvious camp leather look because Judas Priest still rocked, Queen did not on most of their 80's albums. |
The Real Wizard 07.04.2020 00:04 |
Indeed, that didn't help. But we almost certainly can blame their label for that, as bands even as big as Queen usually weren't the ones picking which songs were put out as singles by the 80s. Had Hammer To Fall been the lead single off The Works in the US, things may have been a lot different. Whoever made the choices, they aligned with the BBC radio sound over American FM radio sound, and their fortunes for the decades to follow rippled from that. As ever, hindsight is 20/20. But we can't discount the other things that went down. Even on the strength of their first eight albums they still could've done the North American arenas in 84 if it wasn't for Prenter sabotaging their contacts in one fowl swoop. It was career suicide, and it drove a massive wedge between Mercury and the rest of the band since Prenter was his guy. If it wasn't for Spike Edney working for Bob Geldof, you can bet your left nut that Queen would've been done by 85. |
Saint Jiub 07.04.2020 01:58 |
Evidently, Prenter was involved with Live Aid, and allegedly, Prenter was employed by Queen into (early?) 1986. Obviously, Live Aid gave Queen new life, but apparently Prenter himself was not enough to prevent Queen recording One Vision in September or subsequently when Queen worked on the Highlander movie and the A Kind of Magic album. It seems unlikely that Freddie was given an ultimatum until sometime in 1986. I suspect that Prenter's continued employment did not reemerge as a overwheming irritant until Queen began seriously discussing the Magic Tour in early 1986. I wonder if the rest of the band refused to tour if Prenter was not sacked. |