QueenZone discussion #1455786

Costa86 wrote: The choice between Trump and Clinton is dire. They both have a hume amount of bad points, and are possibly the worst contenders in US history. I wouldn't want Trump to use Queen's music any more than I'd want Clinton.

*goodco* wrote: Mike Huckawantabee ended up paying Survivor around 25K due to playing 'Eye of the Tiger' without their permission, and doing so after being told 'no'.

RS_Protos wrote: The Real Wizzard, "link She may be the lesser of the two evils, but listen to Sam Harris nail it on why she will be just fine in office if she's elected. Say what you want about her - you can't say she's unqualified, unlike Trump who is completely ignorant of the world around him" Listening to a lefty liberal is going to convince me Trump is not qualified, are you an idiot? I can find plenty of videos of why Hillary isn't qualified too. bmbg, i'm also a fan for over 30 years, you are making false accusations just because you don't support him. Too many whiners...........

The Real Wizard wrote:

Costa86 wrote: The choice between Trump and Clinton is dire. They both have a hume amount of bad points, and are possibly the worst contenders in US history. I wouldn't want Trump to use Queen's music any more than I'd want Clinton.

link She may be the lesser of the two evils, but listen to Sam Harris nail it on why she will be just fine in office if she's elected. Say what you want about her - you can't say she's unqualified, unlike Trump who is completely ignorant of the world around him.

Costa86 wrote: The choice between Trump and Clinton is dire. They both have a hume amount of bad points, and are possibly the worst contenders in US history. I wouldn't want Trump to use Queen's music any more than I'd want Clinton.

RS_Protos wrote: The Real Wizzard, "link She may be the lesser of the two evils, but listen to Sam Harris nail it on why she will be just fine in office if she's elected. Say what you want about her - you can't say she's unqualified, unlike Trump who is completely ignorant of the world around him" Listening to a lefty liberal is going to convince me Trump is not qualified, are you an idiot?

queen79luca wrote: Oscar..It s easy to say Trump is fascist..very easy On the other side Peace Nobel prize Obama destroyed Sirya & Libia..keeps troups in Afghanistan and allows Iran...yes a Teocracy to get a nuclear bomb. Now tell me why he s got the Peace Nobel ..

The Real Wizard wrote: This is why most educated people cannot take the right seriously anymore. It's like dealing with school bullies with an aversion to rational discourse.

queen79luca wrote: Oscar..It s easy to say Trump is fascist..very easy On the other side Peace Nobel prize Obama destroyed Sirya & Libia..keeps troups in Afghanistan and allows Iran...yes a Teocracy to get a nuclear bomb. Now tell me why he s got the Peace Nobel ..

queen79luca wrote: Not sure or Don t want to admit? I am sure if was Bush still on charge..He will be considered a war-man..With all the pacifists marching against him.. I never saw these pacifists marching through the Obama administration... It s typical double standard moral

queen79luca wrote: Personally I think Obama was one of the worst Us president ever..

thomasquinn 32989 wrote: I'm 100% sure that he doesn't believe in the inflamatory BS he's peddling, but he's only too glad to exploit a sucker. And suckers there are a-plenty, and they're falling in line behind Trump en masse.

The Real Wizard wrote:

thomasquinn 32989 wrote: I'm 100% sure that he doesn't believe in the inflamatory BS he's peddling, but he's only too glad to exploit a sucker. And suckers there are a-plenty, and they're falling in line behind Trump en masse.

It's scary, but it's just plain interesting at the same time. What would he actually do? He has no idea of how to run a country. All he has done is prove that he can reach the lowest common denominator with divisiveness and fear tactics. But it is still a stroke of genius - he has mastered the art of reaching people on an emotional level. But perhaps that's easier when your base is the ignorant, not the intelligencia.

RS_Protos wrote: "But perhaps that's easier when your base is the ignorant, not the intelligencia." Obama did the same thing, think about it. Well he did reward them though I have to admit, all time high in food stamp percentage ever.........

RS_Protos wrote: So glad you are here and you are not spreading any misguided ideas.... Queen fans are from everywhere and not just from your "side". Sounds to me you can't accept arguments or beliefs other than yours, but i'm glad you can make an account on queenforum.

goose44 wrote: Looks like Trump boost Queen record sales in jolly old England this week. Greatest Hits at 39 GHII re enters at 88. Youtube hits of their main songs have skyrocketed. Dr May cries about it buy I'll bet my boy Mr. Deacon is saying cha ching!

RS_Protos wrote: Queen fans are from everywhere and not just from your "side". Sounds to me you can't accept arguments or beliefs other than yours, but i'm glad you can make an account on queenforum.

thomasquinn 32989 wrote: his failure to outline ANY concrete policies (plus his tendency to promise contradictory things) will not attract independents

If (when?) Trump loses, it won't hurt him - he can lay the blame elsewhere, and strengthen his 'brand' much like other right wing populists who consistently lose do (Geert Wilders!). I would not be surprised if this whole campaign is a business move to attract free publicity and a politicized consumer base. We know for a fact that a large part of the campaign finances flow right back into Trump's coffers through payments to businesses of his (he's essentially laundering his own money), so the campaign isn't costing him as much as would appear at first sight. His business ventures had been doing rather poorly for a number of years, so this might just be a marketing move - that would explain the extreme amount of 'advertising' for his products he snuck into his campaign so far.

queen79luca wrote: If u like political correctness ..I Don t thanks

Pingfah wrote:

queen79luca wrote: If u like political correctness ..I Don t thanks

Being anti-PC is just a dog whistle term for being a racist, homophobic piece of shit these days. It's what weak, hateful people claim to be as they see their antiquated way of life being destroyed.

Vocal harmony wrote: Quote... "if I were to run, I'd run as a Republican. they're the dumbest group of voters in the country. They believe anything on Fox News.I would lie and they'd still eat it up. I bet my numbers would be terrific" Donald Trump People Magazine 1988 I wonder what his answer would be if asked about this?

Pingfah wrote: What George Carlin meant by Political Correctness is not what Trump maniacs who decry it mean by it these days. You guys are simply upset that it is no longer acceptable to be racist and homophobic in public. I'm sure George Carlin never thought it was OK to act like Donald Trump or any of the idiots who support him, and he'd likely tell you to go fuck yourself for attempting to use his words to legitimise the pure hatred, fear mongering and ignorance that constitutes the Trump campaign.