Marknow 13.09.2015 11:54 |
THESE ARE LIVE STREAMS OF THE TV STATION AIRING QUEEN LIVE: STREAM 1: http://www.vertvonline.ninja/multishow.php STREAM 2 (Click on FECHAR to close ads): http://tvtoss.com/pages/player.php?ch_i ... 20Channels IF YOU GET GEO-BLOCKED ON A STREAM DOWNLOAD A FREE MONTHS TRIAL OF HIDE MY IP HERE TO GET A BRAZILIAN IP: https://www.hide-my-ip.com/downloading-hide-my-ip-windows.shtml WORLD CLOCK FOR EARLY PROGRAMMING: http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=ROCK+IN+RIO+EARLY+BROADCAST&iso=20150918T14&p1=213&ah=12 QAL STILL ONLY GOING ON AT MIDNIGHT LOCAL (4AM GMT) http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=QAL+-+Rio+de+Janeiro%2C+Brazil&iso=20150919T00&p1=213&ah=2&am=40 OTHER POSSIBLE LINKS: Stream 1: https://br.screen.yahoo.com/rock-in-rio/ Stream 2: https://screen.yahoo.com/live/ Stream 3 (also for news): http://g1.globo.com/musica/rock-in-rio/2015/index.html Stream 4: http://original.livestream.com/tvmultishow Stream 5 (audio only): http://radiounodigital.com/Eventos/rock-in-rio-live-streaming/ Stream 6: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s-mBapjY8rs Twitter list: https://twitter.com/vanglam/lists/queenadamlambertrockinrio |
Arnaldo "Ogre-" Silveira 13.09.2015 22:47 |
Thanks a lot! Cheers, Ogre- |
Ale Solan 14.09.2015 12:26 |
Marknow wrote: Supposedly a live professional webcast of Q+Al at RIR here: https://br.screen.yahoo.com/rock-in-rio/That's Rock in Rio USA, it doesn't say anything in there about Rock in Rio Brazil... |
popy 14.09.2015 16:20 |
Well, it has br (Brasil) in the address and the Yahoo site is in Portuguese. But if you really want to know where the webcast is keep checking the official Brasilian site http://rockinrio.com/rio/ or the Brasilian facebook page https://www.facebook.com/RockInRio but in the case they post geo-restricted streams, check for international streams on the USA page https://www.facebook.com/RockInRioUSA or the Portugal page https://www.facebook.com/rockinriolisboa |
scottmax 15.09.2015 05:27 |
Are Q+AL headlining? |
popy 15.09.2015 10:48 |
Yes. At midnight, Rio de Janeiro time. |
Marknow 15.09.2015 12:23 |
Ale Solan wrote:Marknow wrote: Supposedly a live professional webcast of Q+Al at RIR here: https://br.screen.yahoo.com/rock-in-rio/That's Rock in Rio USA, it doesn't say anything in there about Rock in Rio Brazil... Seems to good to be true for me too, let's wait and see I suppose. Anybody know if Globo is broadcasting anything? |
Marknow 15.09.2015 12:24 |
popy wrote: Yes. At midnight, Rio de Janeiro time. Midnight? Yikes!!!! That will be 4am here. Best stock up on beer and popcorn anyway. :) |
Marknow 15.09.2015 12:27 |
If the streams are Geo-restricted I recommend Hide my ip, you get a free one month trial https://www.hide-my-ip.com/download.shtml The Brazilian ip works great. |
popy 15.09.2015 15:33 |
With all Rock In Rio festivals (Rio de Janeiro, Madrid, Lisbon, Las Vegas) there are geo-restricted streams, meaning that local partners broadcast only for those countries where the festival is based. But there's also international streams, and those are geo-restricted for the countries where the festival is based, that's why i posted pages of the other festivals because normally they post those international streams. For tv rights In Brasil, Globo and Multishow broadcast everything, or at least what artists approve. On Queen + Adam Lambert night, at 19:00 (7pm) Brasil time, there will be a special 30 Years show. Maybe they will feature also some Queen and Freddie tributes. The full line up: http://rockinrio.com/rio/en/line-up/ |
Raf 17.09.2015 17:19 |
If the webcasts are geo-restricted, try YouTube. I remember Rock in Rio 2011 was streamed there. Rock in Rio Las Vegas was streamed here in Brazil as well earlier this year, I THINK it was on YouTube. |
NickESB 18.09.2015 01:41 |
Raf wrote: If the webcasts are geo-restricted, try YouTube. I remember Rock in Rio 2011 was streamed there. Rock in Rio Las Vegas was streamed here in Brazil as well earlier this year, I THINK it was on YouTube.Yes - I watched Springsteen at RiR 2013 on YouTube. |
brians wig 18.09.2015 05:00 |
I found this link, but who knows? link The only advantage is that webcasts will start before Queen are due on (4 am for those of us here in England), so we have time to check all links before the concert starts. Hopefully some enterprising soul will record it from TV, but if anyone here is capable of capturing the webstream as a back-up, please do so. I'll certainly be trying. |
Mr.QueenFan 18.09.2015 14:39 |
Marknow wrote: Another link here: http://www.vertvonline.ninja/variedades.php I won't be on later for the show but hopefully one of these will work. If you get georestricted download Hide My Ip.This link is working. Just make sure to disable adblock in case you have it in your browser. |
popy 18.09.2015 14:39 |
I think the Multishow is for shows in a secundary stage and Globo for main stage. Has i thought, http://rockinrio.com/usa/ will broadcast the main stage shows. Q+AL will be on stage at 00:15 (Rio de Janeiro time) acording to Rock In Rio Brasil line-up http://rockinrio.com/rio/line-up/ edit: the stream is now live and working in Rock In Rio USA webpage. |
oliverd05 18.09.2015 19:00 |
Hey guys!! found possibly the best quality stream here provided by AOL!! link hopefully someone will b able to capture the stream!! sadly I've had a go and because I'm running on a macbook you cant capture the audio or video without paying for a software license, so sadly that rules me out the running i was however gonna share it on here as soon as i had it sorted but of course now this is no longer possible! So if any1 could capture the stream it would be fantastic!! i plan to watch but would be nice to also get the sound form the video at a later date! Cheers |
winterspelt 18.09.2015 20:37 |
Queen's facebook is sharing this link for the streaming. It's working right now link |
popy 18.09.2015 21:12 |
It was working but now it isn't. Just open the Rock In Rio USA page. |
brunogorski 18.09.2015 21:37 |
Someone posted this on my Facebook right now: No 39', no Tie Your Mother Down and no Days of our Lives! :o |
winterspelt 18.09.2015 22:23 |
Working link link ! Full HD no geo restriction! |
brians wig 19.09.2015 00:51 |
Rock In Rio USA page worked in the UK. Obviously not "Live" as the stream glitched midway through the guitar solo and repeated over a minutes worth of footage. No other glitches though apart from about 3x millisecond audio drop-outs. Amazing picture. Just think, 17 years ago I was desperately trying to watch and record (by pointing a video camera at the screen!), Roger's Cyberbarn gig with a 56kb modem and the connection kept dropping out.... Haha. You young 'uns don't know you're born (to coin a phrase!) ;-) |
bucsateflon 19.09.2015 02:19 |
this looks like it was an epic show! the mix for the webcast was pretty good... |
terraj 19.09.2015 02:43 |
I posted my webrip in the announce section of this forum |
Queenman!! 19.09.2015 03:50 |
RIO was a great show to see. Wow. Great audience, great sound and visuals. But...Same fuck**** setlist as I had predicted and I had different expectations with the song "love of my life" showing footage of Freddie at Wembley 86???!!!! They just don't get it huh.... Wembley at rock in rio. Amateurs! |
brians wig 19.09.2015 10:09 |
Queenman!! wrote: I had different expectations with the song "love of my life" showing footage of Freddie at Wembley 86???!!!! They just don't get it huh.... Wembley at rock in rio. Amateurs!I suspect they are limited as to what clean footage of Freddie they actually have. Of course, footage of Freddie from Rio in 85 would have been ideal really. |
brunogorski 19.09.2015 11:01 |
The band was great, but the audience disappointed me. We in São Paulo, 10.000 guys, made much more noise and sang every single music. Even Stone Cold Crazy was loudly sang. The Rock In Rio audience was a much more generic audience. They knew the top of the Greatest Hits only. You can see that NO ONE is singing Fat Bottomed Girls, for example. At São Paulo the arena almost exploded! Hahahaha |
Kayd 19.09.2015 13:28 |
brunogorski wrote: The band was great, but the audience disappointed me. We in São Paulo, 10.000 guys, made much more noise and sang every single music. Even Stone Cold Crazy was loudly sang. The Rock In Rio audience was a much more generic audience. They knew the top of the Greatest Hits only. You can see that NO ONE is singing Fat Bottomed Girls, for example. At São Paulo the arena almost exploded! HahahahaOn the livestream and TV broadcast, they used the soundboard audio and mixed in some audience noise. Apparently the audience was really, really loud but we did not get to hear that. Look at RGG -- you can see people clapping but you can barely hear it. **** Hard to judge what is going on by seeing a few of the people in the audience. But people who were there say that the audience sang along with every song. |
brunogorski 19.09.2015 15:12 |
Kayd wrote:Sorry, but I disagree. My friend was there and he was just one of the "I only know Bohemian Rhapsody from Queen. The other bands were way better, Queen sucks". Two guys that I know also said that it wasn't nice because no one was interested on the music.brunogorski wrote: The band was great, but the audience disappointed me. We in São Paulo, 10.000 guys, made much more noise and sang every single music. Even Stone Cold Crazy was loudly sang. The Rock In Rio audience was a much more generic audience. They knew the top of the Greatest Hits only. You can see that NO ONE is singing Fat Bottomed Girls, for example. At São Paulo the arena almost exploded! HahahahaOn the livestream and TV broadcast, they used the soundboard audio and mixed in some audience noise. Apparently the audience was really, really loud but we did not get to hear that. Look at RGG -- you can see people clapping but you can barely hear it. **** Hard to judge what is going on by seeing a few of the people in the audience. But people who were there say that the audience sang along with every song. That said, I agree that it was a soundboard mix, etcetera. But I also can see things with my eyes. People were clapping on Radio Ga Ga? Nice, one of the Greatest Hits (literally). When the show started, you can SEE when the cameras film the audience and most of them are doing nothing. They're just frozen! So the camera occasionally filmed the people faces, etc. 90 percent were watching the show through the phone, the other 10 percent were looking to stage without singing a thing! Because they DIDNT KNEW the songs! I have no reason to lie, and you can see it watching the show again. Or I can print if you prefer. The point is that today's music in Brazil, looking at the big picture, sucks. And most of the guys that were there last night weren't Queen fans, or even Queen ocasional listeners. That's a fact. And sucks. |
Apocalipsis_Darko 19.09.2015 17:52 |
The concert was a nightmare...horrible. I think the public took some peyote before the concert or something. |
Raf 19.09.2015 21:19 |
brunogorski wrote:EDIT: I posted a HUGE text here and it's gone because of some Queenzone bug! :(Kayd wrote:Sorry, but I disagree. My friend was there and he was just one of the "I only know Bohemian Rhapsody from Queen. The other bands were way better, Queen sucks". Two guys that I know also said that it wasn't nice because no one was interested on the music. That said, I agree that it was a soundboard mix, etcetera. But I also can see things with my eyes. People were clapping on Radio Ga Ga? Nice, one of the Greatest Hits (literally). When the show started, you can SEE when the cameras film the audience and most of them are doing nothing. They're just frozen! So the camera occasionally filmed the people faces, etc. 90 percent were watching the show through the phone, the other 10 percent were looking to stage without singing a thing! Because they DIDNT KNEW the songs! I have no reason to lie, and you can see it watching the show again. Or I can print if you prefer. The point is that today's music in Brazil, looking at the big picture, sucks. And most of the guys that were there last night weren't Queen fans, or even Queen ocasional listeners. That's a fact. And sucks.brunogorski wrote: The band was great, but the audience disappointed me. We in São Paulo, 10.000 guys, made much more noise and sang every single music. Even Stone Cold Crazy was loudly sang. The Rock In Rio audience was a much more generic audience. They knew the top of the Greatest Hits only. You can see that NO ONE is singing Fat Bottomed Girls, for example. At São Paulo the arena almost exploded! HahahahaOn the livestream and TV broadcast, they used the soundboard audio and mixed in some audience noise. Apparently the audience was really, really loud but we did not get to hear that. Look at RGG -- you can see people clapping but you can barely hear it. **** Hard to judge what is going on by seeing a few of the people in the audience. But people who were there say that the audience sang along with every song. I won't be bothered to type the whole thing all over again - but thake it from someone who's a great Queen fan and who went there expecting history to be made: it was REALLY intense. The audio mix did make the audience a lot less loud. One of the mics for audience noise was right next to where I was, and trust me, if they didn't balance the volume, everytime Adam went on the B stage you wouldn't hear any music, but instead only lots of intense, beatle-mania alike hysterical screaming. People did sing every song line by line. It probably sounded louder in Sao Paulo simply because it was a smaller, closed venue. I watched QPR in Rio in 2008, it was a closed arena. I also watched Metallica at Rock in Rio in 2011 and Black Sabbath in Sao Paulo in 2013, open air concerts. I guess I don't even have to explain how much wilder Metallica and Black Sabbath audiences were, yet QPR's was more audible as their voices echoed throughout the house, while Metallica's and Black Sabbath's dispersed (and couldn't compete with the MASSIVE audio rig). And yes, there were many fans of the other bands and casual Queen fans. But not as in "there were few actual Queen fans", but rather that we (Queen fans, older people etc) had never heard of the other acts and didn't expect them to even have fans in Brazil, yet there were enough to make themselves heard by the bands. But there were probably as many guys dressed as Freddie Mercury as there were New Republic fans :P Hahaha If you don't wanna take my word for it, then just check Queen's fan page on Facebook and take their page admin's word. Apparently (s)he is touring with the band through South America and was stunned by the audience at Rock in Rio. Or simply check Brian and Adam's reactions to the interactions with the audience. I'm not saying Rock in Rio audience was "better" than Sao Paulo - I actually doubt it was. But it was nowhere near the piece of junk you're trying to paint. It was probably almost as good as Sao Paulo, but "feels" epic because it was huge. |
winterspelt 19.09.2015 21:58 |
Apocalipsis_Darko wrote: The concert was a nightmare...horrible. I think the public took some peyote before the concert or something.I enjoyed it but it was not one of the finest moments of thq Q+AL era... |
brunogorski 20.09.2015 01:39 |
Raf wrote:Hehe, okay! :Dbrunogorski wrote:EDIT: I posted a HUGE text here and it's gone because of some Queenzone bug! :( I won't be bothered to type the whole thing all over again - but thake it from someone who's a great Queen fan and who went there expecting history to be made: it was REALLY intense. The audio mix did make the audience a lot less loud. One of the mics for audience noise was right next to where I was, and trust me, if they didn't balance the volume, everytime Adam went on the B stage you wouldn't hear any music, but instead only lots of intense, beatle-mania alike hysterical screaming. People did sing every song line by line. It probably sounded louder in Sao Paulo simply because it was a smaller, closed venue. I watched QPR in Rio in 2008, it was a closed arena. I also watched Metallica at Rock in Rio in 2011 and Black Sabbath in Sao Paulo in 2013, open air concerts. I guess I don't even have to explain how much wilder Metallica and Black Sabbath audiences were, yet QPR's was more audible as their voices echoed throughout the house, while Metallica's and Black Sabbath's dispersed (and couldn't compete with the MASSIVE audio rig). And yes, there were many fans of the other bands and casual Queen fans. But not as in "there were few actual Queen fans", but rather that we (Queen fans, older people etc) had never heard of the other acts and didn't expect them to even have fans in Brazil, yet there were enough to make themselves heard by the bands. But there were probably as many guys dressed as Freddie Mercury as there were New Republic fans :P Hahaha If you don't wanna take my word for it, then just check Queen's fan page on Facebook and take their page admin's word. Apparently (s)he is touring with the band through South America and was stunned by the audience at Rock in Rio. Or simply check Brian and Adam's reactions to the interactions with the audience. I'm not saying Rock in Rio audience was "better" than Sao Paulo - I actually doubt it was. But it was nowhere near the piece of junk you're trying to paint. It was probably almost as good as Sao Paulo, but "feels" epic because it was huge.Kayd wrote:Sorry, but I disagree. My friend was there and he was just one of the "I only know Bohemian Rhapsody from Queen. The other bands were way better, Queen sucks". Two guys that I know also said that it wasn't nice because no one was interested on the music. That said, I agree that it was a soundboard mix, etcetera. But I also can see things with my eyes. People were clapping on Radio Ga Ga? Nice, one of the Greatest Hits (literally). When the show started, you can SEE when the cameras film the audience and most of them are doing nothing. They're just frozen! So the camera occasionally filmed the people faces, etc. 90 percent were watching the show through the phone, the other 10 percent were looking to stage without singing a thing! Because they DIDNT KNEW the songs! I have no reason to lie, and you can see it watching the show again. Or I can print if you prefer. The point is that today's music in Brazil, looking at the big picture, sucks. And most of the guys that were there last night weren't Queen fans, or even Queen ocasional listeners. That's a fact. And sucks.brunogorski wrote: The band was great, but the audience disappointed me. We in São Paulo, 10.000 guys, made much more noise and sang every single music. Even Stone Cold Crazy was loudly sang. The Rock In Rio audience was a much more generic audience. They knew the top of the Greatest Hits only. You can see that NO ONE is singing Fat Bottomed Girls, for example. At São Paulo the arena almost exploded! HahahahaOn the livestream and TV broadcast, they used the soundboard audio and mixed in some audience noise. Apparently the audience was really, really loud but we did not get to hear that. Look at RGG -- you can see people clapping but you can barely hear it. **** Hard to judge what is going on by seeing a few of the people in the audience. But people who were there say that the audience sang along with every song. |
The King Of Rhye 20.09.2015 07:00 |
I saw it on the stream from the Rock In Rio website, the audience sounded plenty loud to me! |
Raf 20.09.2015 10:56 |
While we're talking about audience and webcast... Has anyone found a good video of the fireworks opening the main stage? It was a beautiful show with an instrumental version of BoRhap, and the crowd sang along beautifully, it was probably one of the most memorable moments of the night - but the only version I found features a TV anchor speaking all over it :( It's the Multishow version. I wonder if the webcasts aired that part... They probably wouldn't have someone ruining the show by talking :P link |
Oscar J 20.09.2015 17:17 |
Is it just me, or did Lambert sound really thin throughout? It's like the lack of touring took away the small amount of grit he had a few months ago with Queen. Close your eyes and it's a woman singing. Not that there's anything wrong with female voices, but it seriously lacked punch in the performances I listened to. |
Queenman!! 20.09.2015 17:34 |
brians wig wrote:=============================Queenman!! wrote: I had different expectations with the song "love of my life" showing footage of Freddie at Wembley 86???!!!! They just don't get it huh.... Wembley at rock in rio. Amateurs!I suspect they are limited as to what clean footage of Freddie they actually have. Of course, footage of Freddie from Rio in 85 would have been ideal really. Well that"s a bit bullocks of course. The tape from Wembley was the same kind of tape (quality ) where rio was shot on. Qp knew for months queen were gonna play Rio 2015. A simple email or call to Globo tv would provide them with a decent master copy like the one we saw bits of laat week on the rio 30th anniversary documentary. But no, it was too much work, money or they didn't think about this at all. |
bucsateflon 21.09.2015 02:41 |
who care's about that... |
Viper 21.09.2015 03:14 |
Having seen the show only yesterday, I have to say it was not good! One Vision to start the show is a cliché! Then, terrible change from OV to Stone Cold Crazy. Brian left out some guitar solos, like the Save Me guitar solo. Roger is tool old for that! He needs constant support from his son. He doesn's sing backing vocals, he messed up a little bit the lyrics on A Kind Of Magic and he simply doesn't move his body! I don't know what is he doing! Adam forgot the lyrics on One Vision. Don't Stop Me Now and Save Me. By the way, how can You do a Queen show wihout Tie Your Mother Down?! Only a snippet on the guitar solo...! |
Raf 21.09.2015 07:50 |
Viper wrote: Having seen the show only yesterday, I have to say it was not good! One Vision to start the show is a cliché! Then, terrible change from OV to Stone Cold Crazy. Brian left out some guitar solos, like the Save Me guitar solo. Roger is tool old for that! He needs constant support from his son. He doesn's sing backing vocals, he messed up a little bit the lyrics on A Kind Of Magic and he simply doesn't move his body! I don't know what is he doing! Adam forgot the lyrics on One Vision. Don't Stop Me Now and Save Me. By the way, how can You do a Queen show wihout Tie Your Mother Down?! Only a snippet on the guitar solo...!I think you're being a little harsh on the "messed up the lyrics" bits both for Roger and Adam. It's not really that unusual - grab pretty much any bootleg from the Freddie era and you'll hear him swapping a couple of lines here and there. I guess it's more importante to not mess up the melody. Roger certainly could've moved a little more around the stage, but it doesn't really have much to do with his age - on his solo tours he's always been the sort of singer that just stands in the middle of the stage and sings the songs. And Adam was under a lot of pressure from the fans, from the crowd, from the press and so on, yet he delivered a fantastic performance. He quickly and easily had the whole crowd under his control and chanting his name. He had a very difficult job to do, and he did it wonderfully. Now, Brian... I guess what you said about the other two and lyrics should actually apply to Brian and solos. I don't know if he was rusty from being 6 months away from Queen or if he was nervous (you guys from São Paulo, how did he sound there?), but he messed up several solos. On several moments he was "eating" notes, missing the tempo or simply sounding hesitant. The solo on the One Vision intro was a bit shameful, and even the improvised solos on A Kind Of Magic sound muffled and messy. |
bucsateflon 21.09.2015 12:36 |
all be better in ARG |
Enchlore 21.09.2015 16:23 |
The LiveXLive mix had a LOT of audience noise. They were definitely singing along. Adam forgot a lot of lyrics but overall he was pretty good. I really liked Roger's vocals on Under Pressure, too. Now, I can't be the only one to be disappointed when Brian played the opening riff to Ogre Battle in the guitar solo and it didn't transition into the full song. |
Kayd 21.09.2015 22:24 |
Enchlore wrote: The LiveXLive mix had a LOT of audience noise. They were definitely singing along. Adam forgot a lot of lyrics but overall he was pretty good. I really liked Roger's vocals on Under Pressure, too. Now, I can't be the only one to be disappointed when Brian played the opening riff to Ogre Battle in the guitar solo and it didn't transition into the full song.You are not the only one who was hoping they would bring back a couple early Queen songs to RIR -- I was also sad when this turned out to be a tease, But looking at the videos, most people in this audience seem to know the big Queen hits and not the early rock songs. I think the set list was right for this audience, It may be called Rock in Rio but it was pretty much Pop-Rock and Pop in Rio. I would love to go to a QAL show that was comprised of songs from the 1071-1975 -- but I am not sure that would please most people. |
bucsateflon 22.09.2015 10:32 |
Did anybody catch the moment when AL bust's a load on to Brian's direction(with his mic stand)?The Dr. didn't like that too much... |
Pingfah 22.09.2015 16:02 |
I'm not a fan of Adam Lambert outside of this collaboration, but I really enjoyed Ghost Town, it was better than most of Cosmos Rocks. They should make an album. |
Queenman!! 23.09.2015 02:36 |
bucsateflon wrote: who care's about that...----------------------------------------------------------------- People, like I do, who think a little bit futher about the way Brian, Roger and QP present themselves in the Media. Of course, Qp has to make their own decisions at the end. But it's just not right to say comments like : "Rio 85 was very special for us, the audience siging with 'Love of my Life' really touched us and paved the way for the rest of our shows in South America. Blah, blah , blah. "We look at every show on itself and throw in some suprises as non of the shows are the same"; blah blah blah ..... And when it comes to the result: * wembley 86 footage at 'Rock in Rio'? * same setlist over and over again (with Ghost town as Non Queen track) So I can imagine people see Brian and Roger looked bored during this short American tour. So who cares? : I do! |
Raf 23.09.2015 04:37 |
Queenman!! wrote:Real Queen fans, like us, who follow every concert, dig vídeos on the internet, keep up with setlist changes etc, yes, we do think like you do.bucsateflon wrote: who care's about that...----------------------------------------------------------------- People, like I do, who think a little bit futher about the way Brian, Roger and QP present themselves in the Media. Of course, Qp has to make their own decisions at the end. But it's just not right to say comments like : "Rio 85 was very special for us, the audience siging with 'Love of my Life' really touched us and paved the way for the rest of our shows in South America. Blah, blah , blah. "We look at every show on itself and throw in some suprises as non of the shows are the same"; blah blah blah ..... And when it comes to the result: * wembley 86 footage at 'Rock in Rio'? * same setlist over and over again (with Ghost town as Non Queen track) So I can imagine people see Brian and Roger looked bored during this short American tour. So who cares? : I do! But for the South American press and non-diehard admirers, Queen had been "dead" for quite some time now. Many things we take for granted and pretty much expect to see at their concerts were a big novelty. While for us seeing Freddie from Wembley during LOML and Freddie from Montreal on BoRhap, it was all over the news here, everybody talking about how beautiful and moving it was to see Freddie leading a singalong at Rock in Rio once more. I think it's great to see so much positive press coverage about Queen, but I assume this will make them even lazier: they've been doing this for years, sharing vídeos on social networks and yet they're still treated as big news. Why change? People on TV, newspapers and social networks have talked more about Freddie on the screen than about Ghost Town, which was the real news for us fans. |
Queenman!! 23.09.2015 05:17 |
Raf wrote:---------------------------------------------------------------------------Queenman!! wrote:Real Queen fans, like us, who follow every concert, dig vídeos on the internet, keep up with setlist changes etc, yes, we do think like you do. But for the South American press and non-diehard admirers, Queen had been "dead" for quite some time now. Many things we take for granted and pretty much expect to see at their concerts were a big novelty. While for us seeing Freddie from Wembley during LOML and Freddie from Montreal on BoRhap, it was all over the news here, everybody talking about how beautiful and moving it was to see Freddie leading a singalong at Rock in Rio once more. I think it's great to see so much positive press coverage about Queen, but I assume this will make them even lazier: they've been doing this for years, sharing vídeos on social networks and yet they're still treated as big news. Why change? People on TV, newspapers and social networks have talked more about Freddie on the screen than about Ghost Town, which was the real news for us fans.bucsateflon wrote: who care's about that...----------------------------------------------------------------- People, like I do, who think a little bit futher about the way Brian, Roger and QP present themselves in the Media. Of course, Qp has to make their own decisions at the end. But it's just not right to say comments like : "Rio 85 was very special for us, the audience siging with 'Love of my Life' really touched us and paved the way for the rest of our shows in South America. Blah, blah , blah. "We look at every show on itself and throw in some suprises as non of the shows are the same"; blah blah blah ..... And when it comes to the result: * wembley 86 footage at 'Rock in Rio'? * same setlist over and over again (with Ghost town as Non Queen track) So I can imagine people see Brian and Roger looked bored during this short American tour. So who cares? : I do! Yeah true on that... good point actually. So may I concluded it's all about commercial benefits, succes, money (who writes the song gets the checques) etc? Even after all these years since Queen + Glambert formed, and probably this may be their final tour, you choose commercial songs above a few rarer songs for the fans who kept up with Queen since the seventies and support them all the way through. Yeah... I am perhaps 'the negative creep', but isn't this what makin music is all albout. Be inspired, take a few risks to motivate yourself, keeps your mindset fresh etc. |
Kayd 23.09.2015 22:40 |
Raf wrote:Actually I just check social media -- and on Google Searches, Twitter, Google News and Facebook posts -- the topic rank since QAL started the SA Tour is the same:Queenman!! wrote:Real Queen fans, like us, who follow every concert, dig vídeos on the internet, keep up with setlist changes etc, yes, we do think like you do. But for the South American press and non-diehard admirers, Queen had been "dead" for quite some time now. Many things we take for granted and pretty much expect to see at their concerts were a big novelty. While for us seeing Freddie from Wembley during LOML and Freddie from Montreal on BoRhap, it was all over the news here, everybody talking about how beautiful and moving it was to see Freddie leading a singalong at Rock in Rio once more. I think it's great to see so much positive press coverage about Queen, but I assume this will make them even lazier: they've been doing this for years, sharing vídeos on social networks and yet they're still treated as big news. Why change? People on TV, newspapers and social networks have talked more about Freddie on the screen than about Ghost Town, which was the real news for us fans.bucsateflon wrote: who care's about that...----------------------------------------------------------------- People, like I do, who think a little bit futher about the way Brian, Roger and QP present themselves in the Media. Of course, Qp has to make their own decisions at the end. But it's just not right to say comments like : "Rio 85 was very special for us, the audience siging with 'Love of my Life' really touched us and paved the way for the rest of our shows in South America. Blah, blah , blah. "We look at every show on itself and throw in some suprises as non of the shows are the same"; blah blah blah ..... And when it comes to the result: * wembley 86 footage at 'Rock in Rio'? * same setlist over and over again (with Ghost town as Non Queen track) So I can imagine people see Brian and Roger looked bored during this short American tour. So who cares? : I do! 1. Adam Lambert 2. Ghost Town 3. Freddie Mercury (almost tied with 2b but lower) way below -- Brian May, Roger Taylor. Queen is hard to track because it is such a common word. **** Personally, I could pass on the whole Freddie video thing but it is crowd pleasing. Perhaps it is because I have seen QAL about 30 times and I think the shows that did not have it (like iHR 2013 and iHR 2014 Tour Preview) were better for the absence of the 2D video and not-live vocals. I loved Freddie live but the recording just makes me sad -- and it is a pale imitation of the real thing. JMHO YMMV |