tero! 48531 28.01.2015 14:21 |
Okay traders, let's have a list of all your precious no-fly gems which cannot be shared publicly. (I will update the list in the first post, I hope somebody will stick this to the top of the forum.) This will be for everybody's benefit. The traders will be safe with the knowledge that unwanted announcements will be censored, and some of the regular people will get excited about all the rare stuff which somebody else has. Who's first? |
BETA215 28.01.2015 14:47 |
Hangman acetate. John Deacon singing in the bathroom, and nude. - HD 1991 video (1920*1080), Dolby Atmos sound, taken from a silent 8mm tape. Bohemian Rhapsody (vocal guide by Deaky). Innuendo - guitar section by Maradona (Eaaaarly demo). QPL burnt the original tape, but a cassette with that recording have appeared amongst the collectors. |
Mercuryman12 28.01.2015 14:48 |
Cancelled John Deacon solo album |
BETA215 28.01.2015 14:51 |
And an official remaster of a professional video of the whole Newcastle 1979. |
Mercuryman12 28.01.2015 14:59 |
BETA215 wrote: And an official remaster of a professional video of the whole Newcastle 1979. Lets not forget Montevideo 1983! |
Ozz 28.01.2015 15:32 |
Man in the Shadows by John Deacon |
inu-liger 28.01.2015 15:33 |
Uruguay 1983 Roger Taylor shower tape '99 Sunbury '74 8mm Freddie '79 interview on theCroatian TV |
inu-liger 28.01.2015 15:36 |
tero! 48531 wrote:I hope somebody will stick this to the top of the forum.Ahahhahahahahahaha. Hah yeah sure yeah hah. |
Mrmarioanonym 28.01.2015 15:40 |
complete video of Wembley 1989 (from the famous Miracle tour) Glasgow 1974 Quad Mix (in glorious hiss-o-rama sound) They Stole Brian's Brain! (unreleased short movie about Brian's brain) For Badgerholders Only (very very very very mono bootleg LP including a live performance of The Loser In The End, including a drum solo, recorded in April of 1974 at Dupree's Paradise in Atlantic City, New Jersey) Fukuoka 1979 multitracks and my own 5.1 mix. Now that's Greg's holy grail. |
Nitroboy 28.01.2015 15:55 |
16mm footage from Queen's launch party in New Orleans 1978 |
brunogorski 28.01.2015 16:28 |
I'm Going Slighty Fat by Roger Taylor, early 2014. |
A Word In Your Ear 28.01.2015 16:39 |
Not forgetting the "Dont try so hard" video. |
tempusfugit 28.01.2015 16:56 |
Newcastle City Hall December 11th 1975, i used to have this on a C120 cassette,lost in first divorce....How i miss the tape. |
Mercuryman12 28.01.2015 16:58 |
tempusfugit wrote: Newcastle City Hall December 11th 1975, i used to have this on a C120 cassette,lost in first divorce....How i miss the tape.Awwwee |
The Real Wizard 28.01.2015 23:53 |
tempusfugit wrote: Newcastle City Hall December 11th 1975, i used to have this on a C120 cassette,lost in first divorce....How i miss the tape.That's bloody tragic. Was it the master cassette? If not, then that should mean there's another copy out there. |
Sue Dounim 29.01.2015 02:04 |
this thread started funny but now I'm just sad |
The King Of Rhye 29.01.2015 05:32 |
What not to share? I'll go with......the recordings that someone told you not to share......... |
Voice of Reason 2018 29.01.2015 06:28 |
Soundboard recordings from Savoy Theatre, Limerick, 1973. |
BETA215 29.01.2015 06:31 |
Voice of Reason 2014 wrote: Soundboard recordings from Savoy Theatre, Limerick, 1973. OMFG. |
tero! 48531 29.01.2015 06:51 |
You are of course free to joke as much as you want, but this is a serious topic to the traders. They've invested a lot of money and creative effort into these performances, and it wouldn't be fair if somebody else got to reap the rewards from all their hard work. Why have a 15 page argument afterwards, when you could just censor the unwanted sharing before it happens? |
BETA215 29.01.2015 06:54 |
tero! 48531 wrote: You are of course free to joke as much as you want, but this is a serious topic to the traders. They've invested a lot of money and creative effort into these performances, and it wouldn't be fair if somebody else got to reap the rewards from all their hard work. Why have a 15 page argument afterwards, when you could just censor the unwanted sharing before it happens? Because we love the drama, maybe? |
tomchristie22 29.01.2015 08:27 |
I for one, don't. It's stressful! |
TRS-Romania 29.01.2015 12:45 |
Let me answer with a serious response: 1. Under Pressure (demo, instrumental, with alternate guitar recording by Brian) 2. Killer Queen (demo, alternate lyrics 2nd verse, guitar solo not present on this version) 3. Who Wants to Live forever (piano demo track by Brian, with alternate lyrics sung by Brian, no other instruments) 4. Hijack My Heart (with incomplete Freddie vocal demo, lots of la-la-la's) 5. Let Me Live (basic demo, drum machine, synth bas, piano, no vocal) 6. Mother Love (alternate vocal takes from Freddie that didn't make it to the final version) 7. Sleeping on the Sidewalk (Freddie version one verse only - unfinished and alternate lyrics, incomplete demo) 8. My Fairy King (alternate lyrics, demo version, different drum track) 9. The Miracle (unfinished demo, only first 2 verses with Freddie improvising) 10. Love Kills (Queen version, totally different from the 2014 version, different instruments, different type of tempo) Need to know more? |
Mercuryman12 29.01.2015 12:50 |
TRS-Romania wrote: Let me answer with a serious response: 1. Under Pressure (demo, instrumental, with alternate guitar recording by Brian) 2. Killer Queen (demo, alternate lyrics 2nd verse, guitar solo not present on this version) 3. Who Wants to Live forever (piano demo track by Brian, with alternate lyrics sung by Brian, no other instruments) 4. Hijack My Heart (with incomplete Freddie vocal demo, lots of la-la-la's) 5. Let Me Live (basic demo, drum machine, synth bas, piano, no vocal) 6. Mother Love (alternate vocal takes from Freddie that didn't make it to the final version) 7. Sleeping on the Sidewalk (Freddie version one verse only - unfinished and alternate lyrics, incomplete demo) 8. My Fairy King (alternate lyrics, demo version, different drum track) 9. The Miracle (unfinished demo, only first 2 verses with Freddie improvising) 10. Love Kills (Queen version, totally different from the 2014 version, different instruments, different type of tempo) Need to know more?link |
The Real Wizard 29.01.2015 17:33 |
TRS-Romania wrote: 1. Under Pressure (demo, instrumental, with alternate guitar recording by Brian) 2. Killer Queen (demo, alternate lyrics 2nd verse, guitar solo not present on this version) 3. Who Wants to Live forever (piano demo track by Brian, with alternate lyrics sung by Brian, no other instruments) 4. Hijack My Heart (with incomplete Freddie vocal demo, lots of la-la-la's) 5. Let Me Live (basic demo, drum machine, synth bas, piano, no vocal) 6. Mother Love (alternate vocal takes from Freddie that didn't make it to the final version) 7. Sleeping on the Sidewalk (Freddie version one verse only - unfinished and alternate lyrics, incomplete demo) 8. My Fairy King (alternate lyrics, demo version, different drum track) 9. The Miracle (unfinished demo, only first 2 verses with Freddie improvising) 10. Love Kills (Queen version, totally different from the 2014 version, different instruments, different type of tempo)Do you have these? |
tomchristie22 29.01.2015 18:27 |
If true... Daaamn. That's something. |
tempusfugit 30.01.2015 05:15 |
Was it the master cassette? If not, then that should mean there's another copy out there. It was a copy from the master which was recorded on a reel to reel tape up in the projection room at the very back upstairs of the hall. By a guy called Moose who taped a few bands that played there,i had Wings and ahem, Glen Campbell (for my mam honest) my mate sometimes worked there and imagine my surprise when he gave me a cassette a week later. Maybe i should join Faceache,sorry Facebook and search him. |
IanR 30.01.2015 05:57 |
I've heard of these demos, but don't know if they really exist: Out of Luck (Roger, 1980s) Supernatural (Brian, 1990-ish) |
Double-U 30.01.2015 06:30 |
tempusfugit wrote: Was it the master cassette? If not, then that should mean there's another copy out there. It was a copy from the master which was recorded on a reel to reel tape up in the projection room at the very back upstairs of the hall. By a guy called Moose who taped a few bands that played there,i had Wings and ahem, Glen Campbell (for my mam honest) my mate sometimes worked there and imagine my surprise when he gave me a cassette a week later. Maybe i should join Faceache,sorry Facebook and search him.He's the same guy who recorded Queen in Newcastle one year later, isn't he? regards, W. |
on my way up 30.01.2015 15:53 |
tempusfugit wrote: Was it the master cassette? If not, then that should mean there's another copy out there. It was a copy from the master which was recorded on a reel to reel tape up in the projection room at the very back upstairs of the hall. By a guy called Moose who taped a few bands that played there,i had Wings and ahem, Glen Campbell (for my mam honest) my mate sometimes worked there and imagine my surprise when he gave me a cassette a week later. Maybe i should join Faceache,sorry Facebook and search him.Yeah, you should search for the guy! That recording would be sooo cool to have! |
on my way up 30.01.2015 15:54 |
Double-U wrote:One year later? Queen didn't perform in Newcastle in 1976. What show are you referring to then?tempusfugit wrote: Was it the master cassette? If not, then that should mean there's another copy out there. It was a copy from the master which was recorded on a reel to reel tape up in the projection room at the very back upstairs of the hall. By a guy called Moose who taped a few bands that played there,i had Wings and ahem, Glen Campbell (for my mam honest) my mate sometimes worked there and imagine my surprise when he gave me a cassette a week later. Maybe i should join Faceache,sorry Facebook and search him.He's the same guy who recorded Queen in Newcastle one year later, isn't he? regards, W. |
BETA215 30.01.2015 19:48 |
The Real Wizard wrote:TRS-Romania wrote: 1. Under Pressure (demo, instrumental, with alternate guitar recording by Brian) 2. Killer Queen (demo, alternate lyrics 2nd verse, guitar solo not present on this version) 3. Who Wants to Live forever (piano demo track by Brian, with alternate lyrics sung by Brian, no other instruments) 4. Hijack My Heart (with incomplete Freddie vocal demo, lots of la-la-la's) 5. Let Me Live (basic demo, drum machine, synth bas, piano, no vocal) 6. Mother Love (alternate vocal takes from Freddie that didn't make it to the final version) 7. Sleeping on the Sidewalk (Freddie version one verse only - unfinished and alternate lyrics, incomplete demo) 8. My Fairy King (alternate lyrics, demo version, different drum track) 9. The Miracle (unfinished demo, only first 2 verses with Freddie improvising) 10. Love Kills (Queen version, totally different from the 2014 version, different instruments, different type of tempo)Do you have these? Given that he posted some excerpts from Freddie Mercury - The Video long before it was uploaded for everyone, and that he also shared in his YouTube account two videos: Barcelona (the song) session and the full Garden Lodge tape (Freddie with friends improvising in the piano), maybe. I would love to have something to trade to get one of these. :S |
Fmarton 31.01.2015 04:05 |
I could add to the list the Queen - Jam - Viva TV Documentary. Not that it's a "Not for share" thing, but afaik, it hasn't been shared before. |
tero! 48531 01.02.2015 01:45 |
Since there are no entries from the traders, everyone is free to share anything. Right?? |
BETA215 01.02.2015 03:14 |
tero! 48531 wrote: Since there are no entries from the traders, everyone is free to share anything. Right?? Except otherwise indicated by the trader with who you do the trade. |
Double-U 01.02.2015 04:54 |
Sorry I wrote with the Sheffiled 74 recording in my mind. It was indeed the Newcastle 1975 I had a conversation with tempusfugit a few years ago. regards, W. |
tero! 48531 01.02.2015 06:49 |
BETA215 wrote:Yes and no.tero! 48531 wrote: Since there are no entries from the traders, everyone is free to share anything. Right??Except otherwise indicated by the trader with who you do the trade. The trading circles, as you say, are based on these backroom deals where you are morally bound by the pledge you've made to your fellow trader. And if you don't honour your promise, you'll get a reputation of a bad trader. Fortunately QZ is not a forum for traders, and as such it should not be in any way bound by the traders secret deals. It's up to the traders to seek out their own justice by naming and shaming the bad traders in their own little circles. Some of the traders in here are already acting out as moderators, and stifling topics they don't like. If they want to continue with that, they should ask for official moderator rights, and publish the rules we're all supposed to follow. |
The Real Wizard 01.02.2015 20:25 |
^ dude, give it up. You're becoming like Panchgani now, repeating the same old mantra. We get it. Be the change you wish to see in the world. If you don't like the way it is, then get off your soapbox and actually spend your time building relationships with people and accumulating new things. And then share them here. |
inu-liger 01.02.2015 22:56 |
Indeed. Tero's negative attitude is getting just about as enjoyable as anticipating yet another Greatest Hits rehash release. |
tero! 48531 01.02.2015 23:07 |
The Real Wizard wrote: ^ dude, give it up. You're becoming like Panchgani now, repeating the same old mantra. We get it. Be the change you wish to see in the world. If you don't like the way it is, then get off your soapbox and actually spend your time building relationships with people and accumulating new things. And then share them here.Do you get it, or are you just tired when somebody actually disagrees with the traders? I have no desire to get involved in the trading circles after seeing what kind of person I would have to be, but no-one's stopping you from trading. Just don't try to enforce your code of "honour among the thieves" onto QZ and everything will be fine. |
BETA215 01.02.2015 23:49 |
Something out-topic, sorry. :P tero!, why your name has numbers at the end? You put them? |
tero! 48531 02.02.2015 04:27 |
BETA215 wrote: tero!, why your name has numbers at the end? You put them?It's because of a minor bug on QZ... For some reason it added those numbers whenever I posted from another IP address than my home, and I was too lazy to remove them. |
The Real Wizard 02.02.2015 14:58 |
tero! 48531 wrote:I am responsible for over 100 new recordings ending up on Queenzone.The Real Wizard wrote: ^ dude, give it up. You're becoming like Panchgani now, repeating the same old mantra. We get it. Be the change you wish to see in the world. If you don't like the way it is, then get off your soapbox and actually spend your time building relationships with people and accumulating new things. And then share them here.Do you get it, or are you just tired when somebody actually disagrees with the traders? I have no desire to get involved in the trading circles after seeing what kind of person I would have to be, but no-one's stopping you from trading. Just don't try to enforce your code of "honour among the thieves" onto QZ and everything will be fine. You are responsible for zero. You talk quite the talk for someone who has done absolutely nothing to contribute to the well being of this place and online music collecting in general. You are merely caught in your illusions of what you think music collecting is. This thread and everything you post on this matter is but noise. I await your cheerful reply. |
BETA215 02.02.2015 16:17 |
The Real Wizard wrote:tero! 48531 wrote:I am responsible for over 100 new recordings ending up on Queenzone. You are responsible for zero. You talk quite the talk for someone who has done absolutely nothing to contribute to the well being of this place and online music collecting in general. You are merely caught in your illusions of what you think music collecting is. This thread and everything you post on this matter is but noise. I await your cheerful reply.The Real Wizard wrote: ^ dude, give it up. You're becoming like Panchgani now, repeating the same old mantra. We get it. Be the change you wish to see in the world. If you don't like the way it is, then get off your soapbox and actually spend your time building relationships with people and accumulating new things. And then share them here.Do you get it, or are you just tired when somebody actually disagrees with the traders? I have no desire to get involved in the trading circles after seeing what kind of person I would have to be, but no-one's stopping you from trading. Just don't try to enforce your code of "honour among the thieves" onto QZ and everything will be fine. ![]() |
BETA215 02.02.2015 16:23 |
|
The Real Wizard 02.02.2015 16:30 |
BETA215 wrote:HAHAHA!! Best response ever. Isn't one of those from Mr Holland's Opus? |
Thistle 02.02.2015 18:58 |
Not taking sides, but that response was pretty epic. Love it :) |
Saint Jiub 02.02.2015 19:51 |
tero! 48531 wrote:I understand completely. I need to be "weeded out" (your words) because I am not a collector, and my opinions have not met your lordship's approval.The Real Wizard wrote: ^ dude, give it up. You're becoming like Panchgani now, repeating the same old mantra. We get it. Be the change you wish to see in the world. If you don't like the way it is, then get off your soapbox and actually spend your time building relationships with people and accumulating new things. And then share them here.Do you get it, or are you just tired when somebody actually disagrees with the traders? I have no desire to get involved in the trading circles after seeing what kind of person I would have to be, but no-one's stopping you from trading. Just don't try to enforce your code of "honour among the thieves" onto QZ and everything will be fine. |
The Real Wizard 02.02.2015 21:21 |
|
tero! 48531 03.02.2015 12:33 |
The Real Wizard wrote: I am responsible for over 100 new recordings ending up on Queenzone. You are responsible for zero. You talk quite the talk for someone who has done absolutely nothing to contribute to the well being of this place and online music collecting in general. You are merely caught in your illusions of what you think music collecting is. This thread and everything you post on this matter is but noise. I await your cheerful reply.This is your biggest problem. To you QZ is only the "Sharing The Music - Announce" section (and posting concerts when they've lost their value in the trading circles). Everything else is worth zero, and everyone else is worth zero. It doesn't matter how much you participate in the actual conversation, or how much effort you put into constructing logical arguments. The only thing that matters is how many shows you can share. I actually I feel sorry for you. If you have this same level of contempt for any poster who doesn't share concerts of QZ, there's no way you can enjoy this site. |
Gregsynth 03.02.2015 16:19 |
^ I know The Real Wizard in real life. He's absolutely not who you're painting him to be. If the last line of your post is true - then he wouldn't be a friend of mine and he'd look down on me. |
The Real Wizard 03.02.2015 16:20 |
tero! 48531 wrote: To you QZ is only the "Sharing The Music - Announce" section (and posting concerts when they've lost their value in the trading circles).Incorrect. Most recordings are freely traded. Only a select few have some kind of rarity status that presents challenges in acquiring and spreading them. Or have you missed the threads on this very forum with people exchanging samples of videos and then someone joyfully posts the best of the bunch? So you can breathe better now knowing that this section of the forum does exist from a place of openness and generosity. But I look forward to your pending spin on how this still somehow makes me (and all other music collectors) a bad person. Even still, who's to say there isn't a sense of joy in posting a recording, no matter the circumstances? Where does this sense of entitlement come from whereby the process must be something that you agree with, and the person posting a recording must be undergoing a certain emotional experience that you agree with? Who are you to judge what their motivations are? If you have this same level of contempt for any poster who doesn't share concerts of QZ, there's no way you can enjoy this site.I don't have contempt for people who don't contribute. Most people here are kind and friendly and interaction with them is enjoyable. I have contempt for people who don't contribute *and openly slander those who do*, and pretend to be experts in something they're not. See the difference? All you know about music collecting is a few cherry picked tidbits you've read about on this site. I bet you're an expert on cooking too, because you've watched the chefs from your table at a few restaurants. It's me who feels sorry for you. You're like those anti-vaxxers who tell immunologists and doctors that you know more about medical science than they do because the internet says so. Ignorance is the best card in your deck. You think you are so intelligent and articulate, but by painting every single person in this world who posts music online with the same brush you couldn't be more of a fool. |
BETA215 03.02.2015 16:31 |
tero! 48531 wrote: This is your biggest problem. To you QZ is only the "Sharing The Music - Announce" section (and posting concerts when they've lost their value in the trading circles). Everything else is worth zero, and everyone else is worth zero. It doesn't matter how much you participate in the actual conversation, or how much effort you put into constructing logical arguments. The only thing that matters is how many shows you can share. I actually I feel sorry for you. If you have this same level of contempt for any poster who doesn't share concerts of QZ, there's no way you can enjoy this site. How you could deduct that? Please, read "The Power Of Persuassion". There are more important things to bother than this topic. |
Thistle 03.02.2015 21:13 |
Nah, I know Bob too and I'm not in the trading circle. I've posted a few demo upgrades before, and one show (thanks to Marknow) that was previously not available here. Other than that, I have nothing to give - but Bob has helped me out with a lot of stuff, stood in my corner when I've needed him, and donated to causes I've supported. You may not see eye to eye, but he's definitely not what you've portrayed him to be here, tero. The man has spent a lot of his time working on, and maintaining, the most comprehensive database of info on Queen shows on the web, contributes greatly to this forum, and tirelessly works on shares (whether that be upgrades, speed corrections, merges or completely new shares). And he still finds time to go out and entertain on that red special! If he really looked down on us, there wouldn't be any of that. So what if there's a few gems he's "held back"? Should he not try and gain some reward for the time he's put in sourcing things? I don't see that his shares are us getting the things that longer have no value - I see that as progress. You need to hold back on some things to try and use them as leverage on deals before making the freely available, or else more gems will not be unearthed. Simple, really. |
The Real Wizard 03.02.2015 21:20 |
Thistleboy1980 wrote: Nah, I know Bob too and I'm not in the trading circle.Stop saying nice things about me. You heard the man - employ that binary thinking ! I'm supposed to be hating everyone who doesn't live their life exactly like I do. |
Thistle 03.02.2015 21:34 |
^ I know. You're a c**t, really. After you killed my family, shot my dog in front of me, raped my wife and then set my Hangman acetate on fire, I don't know why I tried to make you out to be cool. |
The Real Wizard 03.02.2015 21:49 |
Stockholm syndrome? |
Thistle 03.02.2015 21:53 |
Muse are great ;) |
The Real Wizard 03.02.2015 22:05 |
I knew you'd say that. |
BETA215 03.02.2015 22:57 |
Thistleboy1980 wrote: Nah, I know Bob too and I'm not in the trading circle. there's a few gems he's "held back" Don't make me jealous! 8B |
tero! 48531 03.02.2015 23:46 |
The Real Wizard wrote: I have contempt for people who don't contribute *and openly slander those who do*, and pretend to be experts in something they're not. See the difference?I see that are adding further caveats to previous message, so maybe you do have a conscience after all. It still doesn't really apply to me, because I'm just writing your own words back to you, not slandering. ;) The Real Wizard wrote: All you know about music collecting is a few cherry picked tidbits you've read about on this site.You're almost right, I have pretty much changed my opinion on traders after reading these messages on QZ. I was completely indifferent before the whole Fanthology incident, but that and the latest "No-Fly Zone" have changed my opinion about you. The trading model worked perfectly before the age of internet when everything had to be physically sent. Now your just trying to eat your cake and have it too: to continue trading as if nothing has changed, and at the same time share whatever material YOU choose to be shared. |
The Real Wizard 04.02.2015 00:07 |
Once again - ignorance masquerading as understanding. Word to the wise from someone with decades of experience to another who has zero - you have added nothing to the dialogue. Just noise. I've invited you to get involved so you can learn. But then you'd have to give up your baseless drivel and droning on and on about things you know nothing about, and we can't have that. What would the announce forum be without people who condemn those who enable this section of the forum to exist in the first place? You're not as smart as you think you are. Good luck with that. |
tcc 04.02.2015 02:26 |
tero! 48531 wrote: The trading model worked perfectly before the age of internet when everything had to be physically sent. Now your just trying to eat your cake and have it too: to continue trading as if nothing has changed, and at the same time share whatever material YOU choose to be shared.Sorry to butt in. The last sentence made me wonder what is the basis for your resentment that people choose what to share. Do you expect your rich neighbour to give you everything that he has ? Unless one knows what they actually have and did not share, how can anyone keep harping on this point. When they actually share, you gripe that it is of no value anymore and that is why it is shared. It is like heads you win, tails they lose. You have said that you do not download anything here. Why then are you so worked up about the trading and sharing of things here ? |
BETA215 04.02.2015 02:27 |
The Real Wizard wrote: Once again - ignorance masquerading as understanding. Word to the wise from someone with decades of experience to another who has zero - you have added nothing to the dialogue. Just noise. I've invited you to get involved so you can learn. But then you'd have to give up your baseless drivel and droning on and on about things you know nothing about, and we can't have that. What would the announce forum be without people who condemn those who enable this section of the forum to exist in the first place? You're not as smart as you think you are. Good luck with that. You're not as smart as you think you are, as Mr. Bob (Sir GH) said. If I were you, I would get involved to learn and start trading, or at least learn. |
inu-liger 04.02.2015 04:33 |
tcc wrote:You have said that you do not download anything here. Why then are you so worked up about the trading and sharing of things here ?For want of a better assumption, he probably just wants something he can lazily latch on to and BAM become a hero for...well, some sort of folk out there. |
The Real Wizard 04.02.2015 07:37 |
tcc wrote: It is like heads you win, tails they lose.Convenient, ain't it? Excellent post. |
tero! 48531 04.02.2015 13:35 |
inu-liger wrote:The reality is actually pretty much the exact opposite.tcc wrote:You have said that you do not download anything here. Why then are you so worked up about the trading and sharing of things here ?For want of a better assumption, he probably just wants something he can lazily latch on to and BAM become a hero for...well, some sort of folk out there. My interest was raised by the Fanthology incident when some of the traders said that they were going to share the same exact recordings, but somebody betrayed their trust and beat them to it. I pointed out that the entire definition of being a trader is trading the material, not giving it away. The only thing traders can benefit by sharing the material freely is personal fame, but it's even more important to be able to trade it as much as possible. The latest incident also brought out the money angle ("why shouldn't I be able to profit from this release if XXX company is going to profit from this same material"). This is a 100% truthful portrayal of traders, and it's only fair that it should be pointed out when they start publicly posting about the noble purposes, or trying to discredit other people for doing the same exact things they are doing themselves. |
Marknow 04.02.2015 14:07 |
If anybody is uploading anything for personal fame or hero status then they are barking up the wrong tree. Can anybody name the guy who shared his Boston '76 recording? some can, but not many. Whoever uploads anything here is no hero in any sense of the word neither is the person who may have sourced that recording. The only hero, if any in the equation is the taper, the person who was there and took the time to archive and distribute the recording. Anybody else in the chain is just a drone, a worker bee. I know many people who have shared their own recordings here and imho these are the people we should be grateful too, not some middleman who shelled out a few quid or acquired the recording thru trading etc. Take the recent Sheffield upload for example, I am eternally grateful that Brians Wig sourced this recording and got it out but he is not a hero, I doubt very much he considers himself a hero, in fact I know he does not , the person who sat there with a recorder 41 years ago, a hero he just might be... I really do wish when somebody shares material that they could say this was recorded by xxx you can contact them here xxx to say thanks. Thats the way it should be. (end rant) |
tero! 48531 04.02.2015 14:14 |
I agree. Great comment! |
The Real Wizard 04.02.2015 14:50 |
tero! 48531 wrote: The reality is actually pretty much the exact oppositeYour reality. You're just limited by your selective knowledge on the subject. I pointed out that the entire definition of being a trader is trading the material, not giving it away.Which is incorrect. You are simplifying and using an ad hominem to further your own agenda. This is a 100% truthful portrayal of traders, and it's only fair that it should be pointed out when they start publicly posting about the noble purposes, or trying to discredit other people for doing the same exact things they are doing themselves.Here it is folks - the truth, presented by someone who has precisely zero experience doing the act his expertise is in. The next time I need a mechanic to fix my car, I'll be sure to go to an environmentalist who owns a shop selling bikes. Why are you investing so much of your day being a broken record about something you admittedly know nothing about? It really is pathetic. |
The Real Wizard 04.02.2015 14:53 |
Marknow wrote: If anybody is uploading anything for personal fame or hero status then they are barking up the wrong tree. Can anybody name the guy who shared his Boston '76 recording? some can, but not many. Whoever uploads anything here is no hero in any sense of the word neither is the person who may have sourced that recording. The only hero, if any in the equation is the taper, the person who was there and took the time to archive and distribute the recording. Anybody else in the chain is just a drone, a worker bee. I know many people who have shared their own recordings here and imho these are the people we should be grateful too, not some middleman who shelled out a few quid or acquired the recording thru trading etc. Take the recent Sheffield upload for example, I am eternally grateful that Brians Wig sourced this recording and got it out but he is not a hero, I doubt very much he considers himself a hero, in fact I know he does not , the person who sat there with a recorder 41 years ago, a hero he just might be... I really do wish when somebody shares material that they could say this was recorded by xxx you can contact them here xxx to say thanks. Thats the way it should be. (end rant)Excellent post. It is, and always has been, about getting the music out there. Let's just not forget that without the worker bees, sometimes those tapes will never leave the attic. Everyone's role is paramount. But of course when the taper is known, they are always and unequivocally noted as being the most important person in the chain (unless they request not to be). And the village buffoon agrees with us. So why is he upset at collectors and holding baseless assumptions that they are looking for personal glory and have ulterior motives for putting music out there? Regardless of his protests - things are what they are, and new music will continue to come. And he and a few others will continue to vilify those who are doing the work to bring the music to places like this. Oh well. I won't even bring up the conundrum of what happens when the taper themselves is the hoarder. Who's the hero then if the tape gets out? But we wouldn't want to advance beyond binary thinking and have a real discussion or anything. |
Marknow 04.02.2015 15:27 |
I fully consider myself to be no more than a worker bee too btw. Though of no significant value as an individual the little I and others do does contribute to the greater good of the hive. For me there is great personal joy in getting material out when I can, I certainly would not step on any toes in the process. I like to think I contribute when I can but I do nothing unique, for me there is a great joy in sharing material, to see others enjoy it, to have it discussed and even criticised. To archive it for public consumption. I'm genuinely passionate about getting as much out as possible. I know it's corny but it is all about those four guys on the stage, nothing more. The music deserves to be archived. |
Marknow 04.02.2015 15:41 |
The Real Wizard wrote: I won't even bring up the conundrum of what happens when the taper themselves is the hoarder. Who's the hero then if the tape gets out? But we wouldn't want to advance beyond binary thinking and have a real discussion or anything. I think calling somebody a hoarder is a very nasty thing to do under any circumstance. Any individual does not hold onto a recording just for the sake of it. Whomever records material should not be vilified for not wanting to share it. I remember Gary Larson(The Far Side) popped up on Reddit a few years ago and asked that his material not be posted because it was like seeing his children out on the street without his knowledge, I can understand that, anybody who cannot needs to think about it again. Same goes for recordings, anything that is put out there without consent of the taper is diminished as a result. |
Chief Mouse 04.02.2015 15:41 |
Marknow wrote: I fully consider myself to be no more than a worker bee too btw. Though of no significant value as an individual the little I and others do does contribute to the greater good of the hive. For me there is great personal joy in getting material out when I can, I certainly would not step on any toes in the process. I like to think I contribute when I can but I do nothing unique, for me there is a great joy in sharing material, to see others enjoy it, to have it discussed and even criticised. To archive it for public consumption. I'm genuinely passionate about getting as much out as possible. I know it's corny but it is all about those four guys on the stage, nothing more. The music deserves to be archived.Good post! |
The Real Wizard 04.02.2015 16:54 |
Marknow wrote: I think calling somebody a hoarder is a very nasty thing to do under any circumstance. Any individual does not hold onto a recording just for the sake of it. Whomever records material should not be vilified for not wanting to share it.You're right - the word 'hoarder' does carry a lot of baggage. I just used the word to illustrate a point to someone else posting in this thread, not because I have a sense of entitlement for what isn't mine. So let's go with it. What happens if you manage to strike a deal with a taper and acquire a copy his tape, but he doesn't want you to circulate it? Do you reject the offer because a couple trolls on a forum will call you a bad person for respecting someone's wishes? Or do you graciously accept because it's your right to do so? |
The Ghost of Lester Burnham 04.02.2015 19:00 |
Fly By Night Surrender To The City Deep Ridge Woe Home Only For Today Earth Cut Me Up (It) Seems Like Love |
tero! 48531 04.02.2015 23:47 |
The Real Wizard wrote:Please do enlighten us about traders, and prove me wrong.tero! 48531 wrote:I pointed out that the entire definition of being a trader is trading the material, not giving it away.Which is incorrect. You are simplifying and using an ad hominem to further your own agenda. If a hundred concert recordings are shared freely on QZ (by somebody other than the original taper, i.e. are pre-2000 recordings), how many of them are shared after their bootleg pressing have been released, and how many are are shared when they still have potential for several trades? |
Ale Solan 05.02.2015 00:02 |
Batteries Not Included Assasin The Search Of Love Little Boogie Friends In Pain Brother Of Mine Lost In Soul Fuck It (Fun It) Brighton Fuck Oscar (Delilah's first idea) Torpedo Attack Midgets & Cocaine |
BETA215 05.02.2015 00:17 |
Ale Solan wrote: Batteries Not Included Assasin The Search Of Love Little Boogie Friends In Pain Brother Of Mine Lost In Soul Fuck It (Fun It) Brighton Fuck Oscar (Delilah's first idea) Torpedo Attack Midgets & Cocaine You forgot She Poops Me (Stormtroopers In Balls), alternative mix with Oscar vocal solo! |
inu-liger 05.02.2015 00:26 |
Man In The Shadows |
The Real Wizard 05.02.2015 00:39 |
tero! 48531 wrote: how many are are shared when they still have potential for several trades?Face. Palm. Dude, that's the entire point of trading for rarities. Your method completely defeats the purpose, which is precisely why other people engage in this activity instead of you. But I'll hold your hand one last time: If you have one thing, you hang onto it so you can get a second thing. Eventually you can share the first thing, and the second thing can be used to get a third thing, and so on. But if you post your first thing immediately after acquiring it you're back to square one. Instant gratification now, but you're shooting yourself (and ultimately everyone) in the foot because you used your free spin too soon. Does this compute whatsoever? Or do you still think you're the expert? This is the last time I speak to you on this matter. You are extremely selective in what you choose to respond to, almost as if you are looking for a fight instead of some kind of mutual understanding. And considering you said you don't even download things from this forum lushly decorated with old recordings, you take so much time out of your day to interrogate and defame those who have made it that way. Furthermore - if your reading comprehension was functioning at a basic level, you would've read and acknowledged the part that said the overwhelming majority of unreleased music has been acquired and shared without restriction. If your obsessive focus on rarities and inability to read were conveyed over any other communication medium it would strike most sane people as bizarre, borderline psychotic behaviour on your part. What a colossal waste of time this has been. The world is not going to somehow be a better place when you suddenly realize how tape trading works. Good day to you. |
Shane Jazz 05.02.2015 01:29 |
Years ago, when I was purchasing a bootleg copy of Opera Omnia on four cassettes (remember that magnum opus?), the gentleman who sent it to me emailed me asking if I was interested in paying something like $100-150 for a cassette that included- -Let Me Out- instrumental Queen version from '78 (so I assumed from the Jazz sessions) -soundcheck audio of Queen playing Innuendo (not The Show Must Go On) at rehearsals for Ballet for Life (no Elton on vocals, if I recall) - Cool Cat with Bowie on background vocals (which has since been leaked) - longer demo version of Brian on vocals on The Hitman (something like four and a half minutes, the notes said) - something from the Time musical that purported to be rare. Cannot remember if it was In My Defense or Time, the song. (forgive me, it's been almost 17 years) - State of Shock with Freddie and MJ (since leaked) - Don't Lose Your Head demo with Joan A. and Roger on vocals. (at the time I hated the song, so I shrugged it off. Now I would love to hear it!) - demo of Brian singing Talking of Love (at the time I had absolutely no idea what that was. I figured it was a solo song) - Self Made Man and one other common known demo. Cannot remember if it was Robbery or Self Made Man but, back in 1996/97, it was totally unheard of. -and a few other things which I sadly don't remember. Being that I was an extremely poor college student, there was sadly no way I could have purchased a copy of these songs. (I could barely afford the $40 or so for Opera Omnia) I have no clue if most of the songs/demos he was claiming to have were authentic, but since a few of them have subsequently leaked, I hold out great hope that the rest (especially a Jazz era demo of Let Me Out) are also genuine. |
BETA215 05.02.2015 02:20 |
Shane Jazz wrote: Years ago, when I was purchasing a bootleg copy of Opera Omnia on four cassettes (remember that magnum opus?), the gentleman who sent it to me emailed me asking if I was interested in paying something like $100-150 for a cassette that included- -Let Me Out- instrumental Queen version from '78 (so I assumed from the Jazz sessions) -soundcheck audio of Queen playing Innuendo (not The Show Must Go On) at rehearsals for Ballet for Life (no Elton on vocals, if I recall) - Cool Cat with Bowie on background vocals (which has since been leaked) - longer demo version of Brian on vocals on The Hitman (something like four and a half minutes, the notes said) - something from the Time musical that purported to be rare. Cannot remember if it was In My Defense or Time, the song. (forgive me, it's been almost 17 years) - State of Shock with Freddie and MJ (since leaked) - Don't Lose Your Head demo with Joan A. and Roger on vocals. (at the time I hated the song, so I shrugged it off. Now I would love to hear it!) - demo of Brian singing Talking of Love (at the time I had absolutely no idea what that was. I figured it was a solo song) - Self Made Man and one other common known demo. Cannot remember if it was Robbery or Self Made Man but, back in 1996/97, it was totally unheard of. -and a few other things which I sadly don't remember. Being that I was an extremely poor college student, there was sadly no way I could have purchased a copy of these songs. (I could barely afford the $40 or so for Opera Omnia) I have no clue if most of the songs/demos he was claiming to have were authentic, but since a few of them have subsequently leaked, I hold out great hope that the rest (especially a Jazz era demo of Let Me Out) are also genuine. If I were you, I would have asked to my parents if they can give me some money I need, and later with the profit of selling a cassette copy give them the money. But that's me. Anyway, interesting list of tracks! Do you remember the name of the man? Maybe we know him. |
The Real Wizard 05.02.2015 09:51 |
BETA215 wrote: If I were you, I would have asked to my parents if they can give me some money I need, and later with the profit of selling a cassette copy give them the money. But that's me.Hindsight is always 20/20. :) |
inu-liger 06.02.2015 05:12 |
Shane Jazz wrote: -soundcheck audio of Queen playing Innuendo (not The Show Must Go On) at rehearsals for Ballet for Life (no Elton on vocals, if I recall)What a fucking treat that would be to hear! I read not too long ago that apparently Jacky Smith mentioned sometime in the late 90's hearing Roger, Brian and John playing the opening bars of "Innuendo" just as she was leaving from a meeting with them in '97. So it seems to me they must have had something in mind with that song that year. Whether it was just for jamming, or for something more I guess we'll never know? |
tero! 48531 16.02.2015 05:09 |
The Real Wizard wrote: Dude, that's the entire point of trading for rarities. Your method completely defeats the purpose, which is precisely why other people engage in this activity instead of you. But I'll hold your hand one last time: If you have one thing, you hang onto it so you can get a second thing. Eventually you can share the first thing, and the second thing can be used to get a third thing, and so on. But if you post your first thing immediately after acquiring it you're back to square one. Instant gratification now, but you're shooting yourself (and ultimately everyone) in the foot because you used your free spin too soon. Does this compute whatsoever? Or do you still think you're the expert?Like I've said all along, the traders don't want to SHARE their recordings, they want to trade them. As long as possible. I've understood that perfectly all along, while you've been trying to spin it around, claiming that the traders have higher moral standards and their wishes of not sharing should be respected because of that. I hope the people of QueenZone can see through your pathetic lies before this place turns into FanthologyZone. |
The Real Wizard 16.02.2015 10:04 |
tero! 48531 wrote: Like I've said all along, the traders don't want to SHARE their recordings, they want to trade them. As long as possible. I've understood that perfectly all along, while you've been trying to spin it around, claiming that the traders have higher moral standards and their wishes of not sharing should be respected because of that.Congratulations on being right. Painting all of the hundreds of thousands of music collectors in this world with the same brush is exactly the way to maturely and rationally view the situation. Indeed, this place is becoming Fanthologyzone. Nothing new is being created or shared these days - not a single post in weeks ! All those posts today are spambots on threads that actually aren't new copies of audio and video. It's all our imagination. Only you seem to get it. The millions of recordings of unreleased music that have circulated for decades are worthless because people didn't release them in a way that you approve of. On behalf of all the myopic music collectors who share one single philosophy on music collecting, we apologize for our lack of oversight. Next time we will only share music while undergoing an emotional experience that passes your personal litmus test. I guess that's what what you wanted to hear? Quick, do something about it ! Since you clearly care so much about this issue, this is your big chance - your opportunity in the limelight to make music collecting thrive again ! We all know you can do it. Because you wouldn't just sit there on your soapbox complaining about something you know nothing about without an actual plan of doing something about it, would you? |
Saint Jiub 16.02.2015 20:03 |
The Real Wizard wrote:Indeed, this place is becoming Fanthologyzone. Nothing new is being created or shared these days - not a single post in weeks ! ... Most traders are benevolent and generous people most of the time, except when something "unapproved" gets leaked every two years or so. It is then when many traders use strong arm tactics to demonize the leaker, discourge the sharing of the leaked material, marginalize the few non-traders that offer their "unsolicited" opinions, as well refrain from additional sharing and blame it on the ignorant non-trading leeches. |
BETA215 16.02.2015 21:47 |
Panchgani wrote:... Most traders are benevolent and generous people most of the time, except when something "unapproved" gets leaked every two years or so. It is then when many traders use strong arm tactics to demonize the leaker, discourge the sharing of the leaked material, marginalize the few non-traders that offer their "unsolicited" opinions, as well refrain from additional sharing and blame it on the ignorant non-trading leeches. Why don't you recognize that Jefffabiano (Mercuryman12) was a simple and plain troll? It's so hard?! Demonize the troll? OMFG! Blame it on the IGNORANT non-trading LEECHES? Leaked?! What's this? QPL or what? C'mon! ... Imagine that you had recorded the whole Golders Green '73 concert with Queen in a 32mm tape from the audience: would you like to share it freely? Or trade it for more stuff and make a collection, until you want to be free of all that stuff (just like Ghostwithasmile is BACK! is doing) and share it in QZ? Remember that if you choose the second option, you can't let that stuff to be shared in internet until YOU share it, or you approve other people to share it. |
The Real Wizard 17.02.2015 00:25 |
We should just let the kids play in their sandbox. They've added nothing of value to the dialogue, so why would they start now? |
Saint Jiub 17.02.2015 18:58 |
Sir Lordship: It is about the Jeckyll & Hyde personality of some collectors. QZ could be purring along for years with collectors generously sharing, but when something is "illicitly" shared, the claws come out, many collectors become vicious and vindictive toward the leaker, and punish everyone by refusing to share anything "new". Some collectors go into control freak mode, throw their toys out of their pram, and punish everyone by refusing to share anything "new". A few collectors even seem to believe that they own QZ, try to overbearingly attempt to impose their "Sharia Law", and even issue demands and intimidation toward Richard and Barbara. |
BETA215 17.02.2015 19:01 |
What a nice sandbox, no? Is it made of wood or lies? |
The Real Wizard 18.02.2015 01:06 |
Panchgani wrote: Sir Lordship: It is about the Jeckyll & Hyde personality of some collectors. QZ could be purring along for years with collectors generously sharing, but when something is "illicitly" shared, the claws come out, many collectors become vicious and vindictive toward the leaker, and punish everyone by refusing to share anything "new". Some collectors go into control freak mode, throw their toys out of their pram, and punish everyone by refusing to share anything "new". A few collectors even seem to believe that they own QZ, try to overbearingly attempt to impose their "Sharia Law", and even issue demands and intimidation toward Richard and Barbara.Blah blah blah. You say so much with no actual content. Like your fellow partner in crime, your knowledge of what music collectors do is limited to your skewed interpretation of what you've witnessed on one music forum. You are definitely not the expert you think you are. Don't you get tired of complaining? If you don't like something, then do something about it. But then you'd have to stop complaining, and we can't have that. Rinse, lather and repeat. Carry on.. |
inu-liger 18.02.2015 08:50 |
Are you in need of a prescription adjustment or something Panch?? You've really overreached into your ass there with your "Sharia Law" comparison. Tell me, when was the last time someone was literally beheaded for leaking a recording? .....Yeah, NEVER. |
tero! 48531 20.02.2015 06:18 |
The Real Wizard wrote: Because you wouldn't just sit there on your soapbox complaining about something you know nothing about without an actual plan of doing something about it, would you?My "plan" is to stop you (ie. the traders) from completely dominating this message board with your warped sense of morality. I AM doing something about it, before it's too late. You only see it as complaining on a soapbox because it's conflicting with your own interests. The simple fact is that every time you trade (with a relatively unknown person), there's a risk of your material spreading to the wrong people. Instead of coping with your own choices, you are outsourcing your risk management to QZ. You want somebody else to remove the material which YOU shared too many times, and try to disguise that as your "morality" and "generosity" of sharing. |
BETA215 20.02.2015 07:37 |
tero! 48531 wrote:The Real Wizard wrote: Because you wouldn't just sit there on your soapbox complaining about something you know nothing about without an actual plan of doing something about it, would you?My "plan" is to stop you (ie. the traders) from completely dominating this message board with your warped sense of morality. I AM doing something about it, before it's too late. You only see it as complaining on a soapbox because it's conflicting with your own interests. The simple fact is that every time you trade (with a relatively unknown person), there's a risk of your material spreading to the wrong people. Instead of coping with your own choices, you are outsourcing your risk management to QZ. You want somebody else to remove the material which YOU shared too many times, and try to disguise that as your "morality" and "generosity" of sharing. What a good plan! Hit the wall until you die! Look the smart people we have, QueenOnline! |
The Real Wizard 20.02.2015 14:36 |
tero! 48531 wrote:It's like we're talking about constructing a building, and you're saying how we need to start blowing balloons before the paralyzed midgets show up with photos of retired baseball players.The Real Wizard wrote: Because you wouldn't just sit there on your soapbox complaining about something you know nothing about without an actual plan of doing something about it, would you?My "plan" is to stop you (ie. the traders) from completely dominating this message board with your warped sense of morality. I AM doing something about it, before it's too late. You only see it as complaining on a soapbox because it's conflicting with your own interests. The simple fact is that every time you trade (with a relatively unknown person), there's a risk of your material spreading to the wrong people. Instead of coping with your own choices, you are outsourcing your risk management to QZ. You want somebody else to remove the material which YOU shared too many times, and try to disguise that as your "morality" and "generosity" of sharing. It makes no sense, and there is no factual basis to what you're saying - only your imagination. Your knowledge of this subject is limited to a few posts on a forum. You just don't have an understanding of how these things work. Stop pretending you do. You're wasting bandwidth and everyone's time. By now most people are just glazing over your inane posts because they make no sense. You, who have contributed nothing to this place other than complaining, are not someone that people here tend to look to for any kind of wisdom or reliable information on any subject - particularly this one, one that you have precisely zero experience in. It's beyond me why you take such an interest in online discussions about a subject you are admittedly not interested in - you yourself have said you don't download music from this forum. It just sounds like you're bitter about something that's out of your hands and have a need to inflate your sense of self worth by appearing to know what you're talking about, and that by yelling at others from the comfort of your computer you'll actually be "doing something about it." Good luck with that. |
pestgrid 20.02.2015 19:22 |
Okay I can now place on here items I have collected, grabbed, traded, found or otherwise obtained and hoarded over the past ten years... I have hundreds of items all neatly sorted, but for now I will just put out the top ten of which I BELIEVE are the best in terms of quality and fullness. Not in any particular order here: 1. Keep Yourself Alive Early Ideas (demo, freddie riffing lyrics recording by Brian) 2. Stone Cold Crazy Origins ( Stone Cold Crazy Queen II version) 3. A Winter's Tale (as it was recorded by Freddie take final, first mix by Roger and John, with Brian's final Guitar overlay) 4. Under Pressure Evolution Medley (from jam to single, begins with 1990 radio intro before Bowie starts talking) 5. now im here (early alternate Johns guitar Version cut off backing vocals) 6. Stone Cold Crazy (3 different Alternate early Mixes) 7. People of the Earth (Freddie version The Prophets Song - unfinished incomplete demo) 8. You Never Had a Heart (a.k.a Death on Two Legs demo from sheer heart attack sessions) 9. 12 A Day At The Races Unused Session (outtakes and unused takes and cuts from various studios and sessions 25mins) 10. Tie your mother down (roger taylor version with Red Special) plus many more that cover all the albums........... |
madmetaltom 20.02.2015 19:50 |
Sounds really cool! what other stuff do you have ?
pestgrid wrote: Okay I can now place on here items I have collected, grabbed, traded, found or otherwise obtained and hoarded over the past ten years... I have hundreds of items all neatly sorted, but for now I will just put out the top ten of which I BELIEVE are the best in terms of quality and fullness. Not in any particular order here: 1. Keep Yourself Alive Early Ideas (demo, freddie riffing lyrics recording by Brian) 2. Stone Cold Crazy Origins ( Stone Cold Crazy Queen II version) 3. A Winter's Tale (as it was recorded by Freddie take final, first mix by Roger and John, with Brian's final Guitar overlay) 4. Under Pressure Evolution Medley (from jam to single, begins with 1990 radio intro before Bowie starts talking) 5. now im here (early alternate Johns guitar Version cut off backing vocals) 6. Stone Cold Crazy (3 different Alternate early Mixes) 7. People of the Earth (Freddie version The Prophets Song - unfinished incomplete demo) 8. You Never Had a Heart (a.k.a Death on Two Legs demo from sheer heart attack sessions) 9. 12 A Day At The Races Unused Session (outtakes and unused takes and cuts from various studios and sessions 25mins) 10. Tie your mother down (roger taylor version with Red Special) plus many more that cover all the albums........... |
BETA215 20.02.2015 21:06 |
Oh my god! That's the stuff I'm hoping to hear! How much time I have to wait to hear them: 7 years? :/ |