QueenZone discussion #1379615

taptap wrote:

SweetCaroline wrote: OH MY GOD: This is trending on twitter right now-- #MoreQueenAdamLambertDatesWorldWide and the countries this is being tweeted from include Sweden, Brazil, Mexico, Armenia, Holland, Norway, South America, Finland, France, Italy, Spain, Germany, UK, Uruguay, Portugal, Argentina, Venezuela, Paraguay, Chile, Russia, Ukrania, Romania, Belgium, Turkey, Bulgaria

SweetCaroline wrote: OH MY GOD: This is trending on twitter right now-- #MoreQueenAdamLambertDatesWorldWide and the countries this is being tweeted from include Sweden, Brazil, Mexico, Armenia, Holland, Norway, South America, Finland, France, Italy, Spain, Germany, UK, Uruguay, Portugal, Argentina, Venezuela, Paraguay, Chile, Russia, Ukrania, Romania, Belgium, Turkey, Bulgaria

SweetCaroline wrote: icy, you better get on the stick and get yourself to one of those shows in Canada -- have your buddy, Inu, pick you up if you don't have a way to get there! I was actually serious when I said I would take you if I lived near you!

SweetCaroline wrote: icy, you better get on the stick and get yourself to one of those shows in Canada -- have your buddy, Inu, pick you up if you don't have a way to get there! I was actually serious when I said I would take you if I lived near you!

taptap wrote:

SweetCaroline wrote: icy, you better get on the stick and get yourself to one of those shows in Canada -- have your buddy, Inu, pick you up if you don't have a way to get there! I was actually serious when I said I would take you if I lived near you!

I think there's only tickets left in Saskatoon and Edmonton (or are some still available from the second show added in Toronto?).  Rob Ford will party-hardy that night, no doubt!  \o/ eta: Looks like there some in Winnipeg, too.  Poor Winnipeg!  Like Nebraska, it's just is too much in the middle of nowhere.  I will say that I ate at one of the best steak houses ever on a business trip to Winnipeg, though.  It was in an old Victorian Mansion - can't recall the name.  We were taken out by our clients, and the steaks and chops were huge!  We all put our voluminous left-overs together in a huge doggy bag for a Winnipeg marketer, and hoped his poor dog wouldn't have a heart attack.

taptap wrote: QAL on Rolling Stones Top 40 Hottest Summer Tours list: Queen + Adam LambertDates: June 19th to July 28th Likely Highlight: Lambert can sing his ass off, so this thing will be great from start to finish. It's especially mind-blowing when Glambert rips into the last section of "Bohemian Rhapsody." Flashback To: The last watchable season of American Idol. http://www.rollingstone.com/music/pictures/summer-2014s-40-hottest-tours-20140416/queen-adam-lambert-0399435#ixzz2z5PTyyht J. Timberlake is on the list, too. It's interesting how RS focuses on all the covers he does. Justin TimberlakeDates: July 9th to August 12th Likely Highlight: Timberlake plays a lot of cool covers like "Human Nature" and "Jungle Boogie," the climax is his incredible finale of "Mirrors." Flashback To: 2006, right as the world was re-introduced to the concept of "sexy."

SweetCaroline wrote:

taptap wrote: QAL on Rolling Stones Top 40 Hottest Summer Tours list: Queen + Adam LambertDates: June 19th to July 28th Likely Highlight: Lambert can sing his ass off, so this thing will be great from start to finish. It's especially mind-blowing when Glambert rips into the last section of "Bohemian Rhapsody." Flashback To: The last watchable season of American Idol. http://www.rollingstone.com/music/pictures/summer-2014s-40-hottest-tours-20140416/queen-adam-lambert-0399435#ixzz2z5PTyyht J. Timberlake is on the list, too. It's interesting how RS focuses on all the covers he does. Justin TimberlakeDates: July 9th to August 12th Likely Highlight: Timberlake plays a lot of cool covers like "Human Nature" and "Jungle Boogie," the climax is his incredible finale of "Mirrors." Flashback To: 2006, right as the world was re-introduced to the concept of "sexy."

Love it -- "Lambert can sing his ass off" and "the last watchable season of American Idol" -- so true!

SweetCaroline wrote: icy, you better get on the stick and get yourself to one of those shows in Canada -- have your buddy, Inu, pick you up if you don't have a way to get there! I was actually serious when I said I would take you if I lived near you!

taptap wrote: I think there's only tickets left in Saskatoon and Edmonton (or are some still available from the second show added in Toronto?).  Rob Ford will party-hardy that night, no doubt!  \o/

eta: Looks like there some in Winnipeg, too.  Poor Winnipeg!  Like Nebraska, it's just is too much in the middle of nowhere.

 I will say that I ate at one of the best steak houses ever on a business trip to Winnipeg, though.

Black Velvet wrote:No offense, I wouldn't want to go with you. You have said some pretty nasty things about me for ages now. All because I chatted with someone you didn't like, so in turn you don't like me. That's really all it took and here on QZ your rage has boiled over towards me.

And I'll say this, inu liger and Yaff who have also faced your rants/rages are very nice people. You are not only missing out on Queen's music, you are missing out on getting to know some very good people, because you are so obsessed by AL.

inu-liger wrote:

taptap wrote: I think there's only tickets left in Saskatoon and Edmonton (or are some still available from the second show added in Toronto?).  Rob Ford will party-hardy that night, no doubt!  \o/

If he is even remotely serious about it, I highly doubt he will be partying anytime soon now that he's in rehab. (*I'm not convinced he's doing the latter for the right reasons, given he's trying to get re-elected this October)

eta: Looks like there some in Winnipeg, too.  Poor Winnipeg!  Like Nebraska, it's just is too much in the middle of nowhere.

Typical American ignorance. Trust me from experience, you have NOT experienced middle of nowhere unless you've been on a road trip across Canada, especially outside of the cities going through Alberta and Saskatchewan where there is NOTHING to look at for miles and miles...literally.

 I will say that I ate at one of the best steak houses ever on a business trip to Winnipeg, though.

You haven't had the best Canadian steak or beef until you've tried those from Alberta. tsskiller can vouch for that.

inu-liger wrote:

Black Velvet wrote:No offense, I wouldn't want to go with you. You have said some pretty nasty things about me for ages now. All because I chatted with someone you didn't like, so in turn you don't like me. That's really all it took and here on QZ your rage has boiled over towards me.

And I don't blame icy. I wouldn't want to either, having faced some of that trolling myself as pointed out below, and I don't think I could keep my words to myself around someone like SweetCaroline if she is just as arrogant in person as she is online.

And I'll say this, inu liger and Yaff who have also faced your rants/rages are very nice people. You are not only missing out on Queen's music, you are missing out on getting to know some very good people, because you are so obsessed by AL.

Indeed. Several Queenzoners and a few QOL'ers I think have met me over the past decade IRL, I am indeed a very nice guy to get along with in general and I'm sure several can vouch for that, but at the same time my niceties and patience only goes so far if I'm dealing with arrogant folk on the other hand. I am not someone you want to piss off.

inu-liger wrote:

SweetCaroline wrote: icy, you better get on the stick and get yourself to one of those shows in Canada -- have your buddy, Inu, pick you up if you don't have a way to get there! I was actually serious when I said I would take you if I lived near you!

1) I don't drive 2) I don't have that kind of money to be going cross country and back 3) Don't automatically assume I can easily pull off the above 4) I have a family and a financial budget to work with, which affects the above anyways

SweetCaroline wrote:

inu-liger wrote:

SweetCaroline wrote: icy, you better get on the stick and get yourself to one of those shows in Canada -- have your buddy, Inu, pick you up if you don't have a way to get there! I was actually serious when I said I would take you if I lived near you!

1) I don't drive 2) I don't have that kind of money to be going cross country and back 3) Don't automatically assume I can easily pull off the above 4) I have a family and a financial budget to work with, which affects the above anyways

Understood! I was teasing about you picking up icy! I also said that icy and I would kill each other before we ever got to the venue if I were to pick her up. She doesn't get me and I sure as hell don't get her! LOL

SweetCaroline wrote:

inu-liger wrote:

SweetCaroline wrote: icy, you better get on the stick and get yourself to one of those shows in Canada -- have your buddy, Inu, pick you up if you don't have a way to get there! I was actually serious when I said I would take you if I lived near you!

1) I don't drive 2) I don't have that kind of money to be going cross country and back 3) Don't automatically assume I can easily pull off the above 4) I have a family and a financial budget to work with, which affects the above anyways

Understood! I was teasing about you picking up icy! I also said that icy and I would kill each other before we ever got to the venue if I were to pick her up. She doesn't get me and I sure as hell don't get her! LOL

inu-liger wrote:

SweetCaroline wrote:

inu-liger wrote:

SweetCaroline wrote: icy, you better get on the stick and get yourself to one of those shows in Canada -- have your buddy, Inu, pick you up if you don't have a way to get there! I was actually serious when I said I would take you if I lived near you!

1) I don't drive 2) I don't have that kind of money to be going cross country and back 3) Don't automatically assume I can easily pull off the above 4) I have a family and a financial budget to work with, which affects the above anyways

Understood! I was teasing about you picking up icy! I also said that icy and I would kill each other before we ever got to the venue if I were to pick her up. She doesn't get me and I sure as hell don't get her! LOL

I sure as fuck don't get you either. And I'm so SURE you were teasing...right.

SweetCaroline wrote: Poor, poor icy -- she didn't get anywhere going after Montavilla and had the mods telling her to "shut up" so now she is back here to go after taptap and me! Poor, poor misunderstood icy!

inu-liger wrote: Not when your posts can be read at face value. Remember, text conversations don't carry the tonal weight as vocal conversations do.

SweetCaroline wrote: inu-liger, Only 46 days until my first Queen + Adam show in Chicago. How soon is the first one you are going to?

SweetCaroline wrote: And what are YOU besides a pain in the neck? Why don't you mind your own business?

SweetCaroline wrote: Poor, poor icy -- she didn't get anywhere going after Montavilla and had the mods telling her to "shut up" so now she is back here to go after taptap and me! Poor, poor misunderstood icy!

SweetCaroline wrote: And what are YOU besides a pain in the neck? Why don't you mind your own business?

YAFF wrote:

SweetCaroline wrote: And what are YOU besides a pain in the neck? Why don't you mind your own business?

Naw, see, Icy helps keep you and craptrap from turning this into an Adam Lambert's Bulge fanclub

SweetCaroline wrote: It's okay--you and your other juvenile boyfriend can take over this thread because there's nothing interesting or intelligent in your conversation that anyone with half a brain would care about! Enjoy yourselves, idiots! You are made for each other!

SweetCaroline wrote: inu-liger, Only 46 days until my first Queen + Adam show in Chicago. How soon is the first one you are going to?

inu-liger wrote:

SweetCaroline wrote: inu-liger, Only 46 days until my first Queen + Adam show in Chicago. How soon is the first one you are going to?

Somebody failed Sesame Street when they were young

SweetCaroline wrote: If that's your mission to get under people's skin instead of having an intelligent conversation, then you are the penultimate example of an Internet TROLL!

SweetCaroline wrote: Surely you are referring to icy when you talk about people who are easily enraged -- she thinks people are talking to or about her when they are clearly responding to someone else. She is so paranoid or egotistical that she thinks everything is directed at her and then when people are forced to explain otherwise she just goes on and on and on. If you ignore her to avoid that nonsense then she whines endlessly that no one answers her. We've been dealing with that for over two years so unless you are here under an alias, don't be fooled by her cries of victimization by the unfeeling Glamberts!

SweetCaroline wrote: Surely you are referring to icy when you talk about people who are easily enraged -- she thinks people are talking to or about her when they are clearly responding to someone else. She is so paranoid or egotistical that she thinks everything is directed at her and then when people are forced to explain otherwise she just goes on and on and on. If you ignore her to avoid that nonsense then she whines endlessly that no one answers her. We've been dealing with that for over two years so unless you are here under an alias, don't be fooled by her cries of victimization by the unfeeling Glamberts!

SweetCaroline wrote: Surely you are referring to icy when you talk about people who are easily enraged -- she thinks people are talking to or about her when they are clearly responding to someone else. She is so paranoid or egotistical that she thinks everything is directed at her and then when people are forced to explain otherwise she just goes on and on and on. If you ignore her to avoid that nonsense then she whines endlessly that no one answers her. We've been dealing with that for over two years so unless you are here under an alias, don't be fooled by her cries of victimization by the unfeeling Glamberts!

SweetCaroline wrote: If that's your mission to get under people's skin instead of having an intelligent conversation, then you are the penultimate example of an Internet TROLL!

Black Velvet wrote:

SweetCaroline wrote: If that's your mission to get under people's skin instead of having an intelligent conversation, then you are the penultimate example of an Internet TROLL!

Oh my. How you are losing it. Haha! Intelligent conversation you say, what, the copy and paste posts is mainly what "your" posts consist of. That makes you a troll and a spammer. It's almost as if you don't have a thought of your own to give. It's been said I repeat myself, but hey at least I'm able to give my own takes on things, and listen to everyone on all "sides" have the decency to be happy for the ones who will go to a show. What is your mission here? To defend/protect/spam about AL? Trying to convert people in becoming AL fans, laying blame on people, and you want a convo just between you and taptap and others who feel exactly the way you do about AL. You have tried to do much of the same on qol, and now here. Do get a grip, because you are slipping. And it's funny to watch you go into a rage over nothing.

taptap wrote:

Black Velvet wrote:

SweetCaroline wrote: If that's your mission to get under people's skin instead of having an intelligent conversation, then you are the penultimate example of an Internet TROLL!

Oh my. How you are losing it. Haha! Intelligent conversation you say, what, the copy and paste posts is mainly what "your" posts consist of. That makes you a troll and a spammer. It's almost as if you don't have a thought of your own to give. It's been said I repeat myself, but hey at least I'm able to give my own takes on things, and listen to everyone on all "sides" have the decency to be happy for the ones who will go to a show. What is your mission here? To defend/protect/spam about AL? Trying to convert people in becoming AL fans, laying blame on people, and you want a convo just between you and taptap and others who feel exactly the way you do about AL. You have tried to do much of the same on qol, and now here. Do get a grip, because you are slipping. And it's funny to watch you go into a rage over nothing.

3 shots.  Slow down, icy, I'm getting tipsy and the day is still young.

Black Velvet wrote:

taptap wrote:

Black Velvet wrote:

SweetCaroline wrote: If that's your mission to get under people's skin instead of having an intelligent conversation, then you are the penultimate example of an Internet TROLL!

Oh my. How you are losing it. Haha! Intelligent conversation you say, what, the copy and paste posts is mainly what "your" posts consist of. That makes you a troll and a spammer. It's almost as if you don't have a thought of your own to give. It's been said I repeat myself, but hey at least I'm able to give my own takes on things, and listen to everyone on all "sides" have the decency to be happy for the ones who will go to a show. What is your mission here? To defend/protect/spam about AL? Trying to convert people in becoming AL fans, laying blame on people, and you want a convo just between you and taptap and others who feel exactly the way you do about AL. You have tried to do much of the same on qol, and now here. Do get a grip, because you are slipping. And it's funny to watch you go into a rage over nothing.

3 shots.  Slow down, icy, I'm getting tipsy and the day is still young.

Aww, I'm blamed for something else LOL. Share it with SC, as I think you two could use it!

taptap wrote:

SweetCaroline wrote: Surely you are referring to icy when you talk about people who are easily enraged -- she thinks people are talking to or about her when they are clearly responding to someone else. She is so paranoid or egotistical that she thinks everything is directed at her and then when people are forced to explain otherwise she just goes on and on and on. If you ignore her to avoid that nonsense then she whines endlessly that no one answers her. We've been dealing with that for over two years so unless you are here under an alias, don't be fooled by her cries of victimization by the unfeeling Glamberts!

taptap wrote: She has all the comical makings of a drinking game, tho! 1 shot for every reference to homophobe or hater 2 shots for every instance where she uses them together (homophobe/hater) 1 shot for every wannabe-spokesperson  or promotion reference 2 shots for every instance where she uses them together (wannabe-spokesperson doing PR for Adam). 1 shot for every whine about how she's blamed for every banning 1 shot for every whine that she's not the cause of threads ending 1 shot for every time she says you don't talk about music 2 shots for every post where she says you don't talk about music and doesn't talk about music herself 1 shot for every time she says she's a fan of some of Adam's music 1 shot for every reference that she's can't go to the shows, but hopes Brian and Roger sing most of the songs 1 shot for every has not/never has been/never will be bit of convoluted, mixed verb tense phrasing 1 shot for every rant that accuses others of ranting 1 shot every time she blames all her woes on CNB/SweetCaroline or taptap/mithril. 2 shots when she blames all her woes on all CNB/SweetCaroline AND taptap/mithril. 1 shot for every rant against c/p and links So much more, but this is enough to keep you drunk pretty much non-stop, so save the game for a company weekend!  To keep your chances of alcohol poisoning low, you can follow an alternative version where it's 3 shots if she uses all of them at once, but then you need to do an additional shot for each post that does the exact same thing in the 24 hours that follows (you'll still be terribly drunk).

SweetCaroline wrote:

taptap wrote:

SweetCaroline wrote: Surely you are referring to icy when you talk about people who are easily enraged -- she thinks people are talking to or about her when they are clearly responding to someone else. She is so paranoid or egotistical that she thinks everything is directed at her and then when people are forced to explain otherwise she just goes on and on and on. If you ignore her to avoid that nonsense then she whines endlessly that no one answers her. We've been dealing with that for over two years so unless you are here under an alias, don't be fooled by her cries of victimization by the unfeeling Glamberts!

taptap wrote: She has all the comical makings of a drinking game, tho! 1 shot for every reference to homophobe or hater 2 shots for every instance where she uses them together (homophobe/hater) 1 shot for every wannabe-spokesperson  or promotion reference 2 shots for every instance where she uses them together (wannabe-spokesperson doing PR for Adam). 1 shot for every whine about how she's blamed for every banning 1 shot for every whine that she's not the cause of threads ending 1 shot for every time she says you don't talk about music 2 shots for every post where she says you don't talk about music and doesn't talk about music herself 1 shot for every time she says she's a fan of some of Adam's music 1 shot for every reference that she's can't go to the shows, but hopes Brian and Roger sing most of the songs 1 shot for every has not/never has been/never will be bit of convoluted, mixed verb tense phrasing 1 shot for every rant that accuses others of ranting 1 shot every time she blames all her woes on CNB/SweetCaroline or taptap/mithril. 2 shots when she blames all her woes on all CNB/SweetCaroline AND taptap/mithril. 1 shot for every rant against c/p and links So much more, but this is enough to keep you drunk pretty much non-stop, so save the game for a company weekend!  To keep your chances of alcohol poisoning low, you can follow an alternative version where it's 3 shots if she uses all of them at once, but then you need to do an additional shot for each post that does the exact same thing in the 24 hours that follows (you'll still be terribly drunk).

Caution: Do Not Play This Game and Drive !!!!!

SweetCaroline wrote: If that's your mission to get under people's skin instead of having an intelligent conversation, then you are the penultimate example of an Internet TROLL!

SweetCaroline wrote: Picky! Picky! Picky! You know what I meant -- the ultimate and most extreme!

SweetCaroline wrote:

inu-liger wrote:

SweetCaroline wrote:

inu-liger wrote:

SweetCaroline wrote: icy, you better get on the stick and get yourself to one of those shows in Canada -- have your buddy, Inu, pick you up if you don't have a way to get there! I was actually serious when I said I would take you if I lived near you!

1) I don't drive 2) I don't have that kind of money to be going cross country and back 3) Don't automatically assume I can easily pull off the above 4) I have a family and a financial budget to work with, which affects the above anyways

Understood! I was teasing about you picking up icy! I also said that icy and I would kill each other before we ever got to the venue if I were to pick her up. She doesn't get me and I sure as hell don't get her! LOL

I sure as fuck don't get you either. And I'm so SURE you were teasing...right.

It's called sarcastic humor. I thought that should be obvious!

inu-liger wrote: Yes you do. End of story.

SweetCaroline wrote:

inu-liger wrote: Yes you do. End of story.

Whatever floats your boat. I didn't come here to argue with anyone, including the frozen one. I'm excited about the QAL collaboration and want to share that excitement with others who are attending the concerts. I didn't expect to be followed here by negative people from the QOL website.

SweetCaroline wrote:

inu-liger wrote: Yes you do. End of story.

Whatever floats your boat. I didn't come here to argue with anyone, including the frozen one. I'm excited about the QAL collaboration and want to share that excitement with others who are attending the concerts. I didn't expect to be followed here by negative people from the QOL website.

Black Velvet wrote:

SweetCaroline wrote:

inu-liger wrote: Yes you do. End of story.

Whatever floats your boat. I didn't come here to argue with anyone, including the frozen one. I'm excited about the QAL collaboration and want to share that excitement with others who are attending the concerts. I didn't expect to be followed here by negative people from the QOL website.

Yet, you mentioned your ban here, and blamed me for it, and other bans besides. Which still is confusing as I don't know of any other bans other than yours. You should change your name to bittercaroline or sour grapes. Because you sure as hell aren't sweet. Negative people? Who else are you once again trying to drag into this. Following/stalker as you usually come out with...do you not get that this is a public board yet? Inu realises I was here over 5 years ago, and lost my details. I decided to join again, simple really. I know you came here to promote/spam about AL, and whine about your ban, even before I started to post here, and after I started to post and to blame me for your ban. And as recently as a couple weeks ago blaming me for other bans. You and taptap can say anything you want about me here. I laugh at your upset/rages, but does it ever speak volumes you feel you have to warn people about others and the way you lash out over nothing. Just be decent enough not to be nasty to inu liger, Freddiecat, as they don't deserve it and trying to get others here on your side. What you don't even begin to understand(and you never will), you don't realise that many posters here have minds for themselves. That's what you don't like and people daring not having the same views as you. You are truly pathetic. You said a few weeks back you will never be sorry for all the crap you said/spread about me not only on QOL, but Amazon and now here. That also speaks volumes. Three places for over 2 years much of the time, and you are upset/angry with me because I won't stand for your crazy, f**ked up shit here.

taptap wrote:

Black Velvet wrote:

SweetCaroline wrote:

inu-liger wrote: Yes you do. End of story.

Whatever floats your boat. I didn't come here to argue with anyone, including the frozen one. I'm excited about the QAL collaboration and want to share that excitement with others who are attending the concerts. I didn't expect to be followed here by negative people from the QOL website.

Yet, you mentioned your ban here, and blamed me for it, and other bans besides. Which still is confusing as I don't know of any other bans other than yours. You should change your name to bittercaroline or sour grapes. Because you sure as hell aren't sweet. Negative people? Who else are you once again trying to drag into this. Following/stalker as you usually come out with...do you not get that this is a public board yet? Inu realises I was here over 5 years ago, and lost my details. I decided to join again, simple really. I know you came here to promote/spam about AL, and whine about your ban, even before I started to post here, and after I started to post and to blame me for your ban. And as recently as a couple weeks ago blaming me for other bans. You and taptap can say anything you want about me here. I laugh at your upset/rages, but does it ever speak volumes you feel you have to warn people about others and the way you lash out over nothing. Just be decent enough not to be nasty to inu liger, Freddiecat, as they don't deserve it and trying to get others here on your side. What you don't even begin to understand(and you never will), you don't realise that many posters here have minds for themselves. That's what you don't like and people daring not having the same views as you. You are truly pathetic. You said a few weeks back you will never be sorry for all the crap you said/spread about me not only on QOL, but Amazon and now here. That also speaks volumes. Three places for over 2 years much of the time, and you are upset/angry with me because I won't stand for your crazy, f**ked up shit here.

9 shots.*burb*

taptap wrote:

SweetCaroline wrote:

inu-liger wrote: Yes you do. End of story.

Whatever floats your boat. I didn't come here to argue with anyone, including the frozen one. I'm excited about the QAL collaboration and want to share that excitement with others who are attending the concerts. I didn't expect to be followed here by negative people from the QOL website.

You should have, though, considering she follows you all over the internet.  Some people ;>

Black Velvet wrote:

LOL. Keep drinking. Adds as much sense as your and SC's swooning over pics of AL's, and the discussion you both want between yourselves and no one else, and your desperate hopes pinned on Brian and Roger Lipton/Avicii or whatever is the latest thing you focus on to make AL mega. 

I won't base all Glamberts on you 2, but the tactics you both use is frankly deplorable and you lash out, post nonsense and spread crap when you can't get your own ways.

Black Velvet wrote:

taptap wrote:

SweetCaroline wrote:

inu-liger wrote: Yes you do. End of story.

Whatever floats your boat. I didn't come here to argue with anyone, including the frozen one. I'm excited about the QAL collaboration and want to share that excitement with others who are attending the concerts. I didn't expect to be followed here by negative people from the QOL website.

You should have, though, considering she follows you all over the internet.  Some people ;>

Just what proof do you have that you are putting it out there that I'm following her all over the internet? If you consider replying to someone on 2 boards, following someone all over the internet, you are wrong, and you need to get out more. Also majorly f**ked up after the fact you stated more than once that you copied/kept and threatened to forward my posts I made on to a legal commission. Some people eh.

SweetCaroline wrote: It would be really nice if these threads could stay on topic. But no I did not talk about being banned until someone else, not icy, came over from QOL and mentioned it first. Then I answered them. I did not come to this website to complain about being banned. I came here to get away from the troublemakers and didn't expect them to follow me here. Yes, icy, I and others were banned over there from getting into conversations with you and Milkman. I have had you on ignore but when I slipped and tried to post something in a light hearted way it didn't matter. I still got banned. There is no responding directly to you or to Milkman without getting into a neverending shouting match, as is occurring here now. What I said about you at Amazon was NOT nasty. I was feeling sorry for you being in the clutches of Milkman. I really don't want to talk about this or anything else with you, so please find someone else and some other subject to talk about. I have nothing against any of the other posters in this forum or anywhere else--just you and Milkman and any other aliases he goes by! No more! I'm done with you, forever!

SweetCaroline wrote: It would be really nice if these threads could stay on topic. But no I did not talk about being banned until someone else, not icy, came over from QOL and mentioned it first. Then I answered them. I did not come to this website to complain about being banned. I came here to get away from the troublemakers and didn't expect them to follow me here. Yes, icy, I and others were banned over there from getting into conversations with you and Milkman. I have had you on ignore but when I slipped and tried to post something in a light hearted way it didn't matter. I still got banned. There is no responding directly to you or to Milkman without getting into a neverending shouting match, as is occurring here now. What I said about you at Amazon was NOT nasty. I was feeling sorry for you being in the clutches of Milkman. I really don't want to talk about this or anything else with you, so please find someone else and some other subject to talk about. I have nothing against any of the other posters in this forum or anywhere else--just you and Milkman and any other aliases he goes by! No more! I'm done with you, forever!

Black Velvet wrote:

SweetCaroline wrote: It would be really nice if these threads could stay on topic. But no I did not talk about being banned until someone else, not icy, came over from QOL and mentioned it first. Then I answered them. I did not come to this website to complain about being banned. I came here to get away from the troublemakers and didn't expect them to follow me here. Yes, icy, I and others were banned over there from getting into conversations with you and Milkman. I have had you on ignore but when I slipped and tried to post something in a light hearted way it didn't matter. I still got banned. There is no responding directly to you or to Milkman without getting into a neverending shouting match, as is occurring here now. What I said about you at Amazon was NOT nasty. I was feeling sorry for you being in the clutches of Milkman. I really don't want to talk about this or anything else with you, so please find someone else and some other subject to talk about. I have nothing against any of the other posters in this forum or anywhere else--just you and Milkman and any other aliases he goes by! No more! I'm done with you, forever!

The mental state you have, or rather lack of it, is a worry. You posted about your ban on Amazon and here, even before I joined here. When you knew who I was, you blamed me. Honestly, you cannot even keep your stories straight. You blamed me for a ban for your crying in my beer post, now you are saying you and others were banned for simply talking with me and another poster. Yet, you gave another story on Amazon. You are slipping here too. I can't quite believe you are that pitiful and biased enough to feel you have to warn people about someone else, then not to like someone for talking with another person you don't like. Do you know Milkman is here? I don't, even if he was I'd gladly talk with him. I talk with inu liger, Freddiecat, and vice versa, that is enough to get under your skin. You judged Freddiecat harshly because in your feeble mind, you think she was defending me. Suddenly you don't want to talk to me, does that go for talking about me as well? Something I post here will surely annoy you enough that you can say all sorts about me with mithril/taptap chiming in. You don't feel sorry for me. It was you who posted details on Amazon with your friends, then after your bans, you took it to here and you are still blaming me, and your snide remarks to me/about me on QOL and Amazon. You clearly can't handle my not keeping quiet here, which I know that's what you and taptap want/need. Done with me? Yea, until the next offense/defense/protection/spam/lies you want to spread. Please do get a life. You are fucking paranoid/deluded and hateful.

SweetCaroline wrote: inu, I don't have an agenda and I'm not the one going off on unnecessary tangents!

SweetCaroline wrote: inu, I don't have an agenda and I'm not the one going off on unnecessary tangents!

inu-liger wrote:

SweetCaroline wrote: inu, I don't have an agenda and I'm not the one going off on unnecessary tangents!

You expect me to believe that garbage? You and Mithril were told off for that type of behaviour by QOL mods numerous times, where everybody could see it, and you were banned in no small part owing to that behaviour. You must be a cousin of rocknrolllover or something, cos you both share the dubious distinction of vehement denial in the face of facts.

inu-liger wrote: And again icy, I would expect that type of overzealous behaviour from a fanboy/fangirl in their 20's or maybe 30's, but NOT in their 60's. Your life has got to be uttery miserable if that's how you choose to spend your retirement* years online. *Assuming Carol could be retired

SweetCaroline wrote: It would be really nice if these threads could stay on topic. But no I did not talk about being banned until someone else, not icy, came over from QOL and mentioned it first. Then I answered them. I did not come to this website to complain about being banned. I came here to get away from the troublemakers and didn't expect them to follow me here. Yes, icy, I and others were banned over there from getting into conversations with you and Milkman. I have had you on ignore but when I slipped and tried to post something in a light hearted way it didn't matter. I still got banned. There is no responding directly to you or to Milkman without getting into a neverending shouting match, as is occurring here now. What I said about you at Amazon was NOT nasty. I was feeling sorry for you being in the clutches of Milkman. I really don't want to talk about this or anything else with you, so please find someone else and some other subject to talk about. I have nothing against any of the other posters in this forum or anywhere else--just you and Milkman and any other aliases he goes by! No more! I'm done with you, forever!

Bullet with Butterfly Wings wrote:

inu-liger wrote: And again icy, I would expect that type of overzealous behaviour from a fanboy/fangirl in their 20's or maybe 30's, but NOT in their 60's. Your life has got to be uttery miserable if that's how you choose to spend your retirement* years online. *Assuming Carol could be retired

For me, I wouldn't expect to see it from anyone at any age. It's shocking what causes her to be upset/lash out, I'm not kidding when I say it's worrying. I wouldn't even call her a fan of AL's TBH. She is feeble minded enough to think someone is here with no proof, to become upset/lash out time and time again, to hold grudges for well over 2 years with me, and to sum it up cant even keep her stories straight. She says she is done, she said that many times before only not to be done after all. Maybe with taptap and sweetcaroline spreading their lies and misinformation about me makes them feel better. Some things are surely lacking for them somewhere.

taptap wrote:

Bullet with Butterfly Wings wrote:

inu-liger wrote: And again icy, I would expect that type of overzealous behaviour from a fanboy/fangirl in their 20's or maybe 30's, but NOT in their 60's. Your life has got to be uttery miserable if that's how you choose to spend your retirement* years online. *Assuming Carol could be retired

For me, I wouldn't expect to see it from anyone at any age. It's shocking what causes her to be upset/lash out, I'm not kidding when I say it's worrying. I wouldn't even call her a fan of AL's TBH. She is feeble minded enough to think someone is here with no proof, to become upset/lash out time and time again, to hold grudges for well over 2 years with me, and to sum it up cant even keep her stories straight. She says she is done, she said that many times before only not to be done after all. Maybe with taptap and sweetcaroline spreading their lies and misinformation about me makes them feel better. Some things are surely lacking for them somewhere.

hai icy hai! 4 shots (and 9 for the longer one that followed)

inu-liger wrote: Source?

FreddieCat wrote: SAP is not sold out.

SweetCaroline wrote:

FreddieCat wrote: SAP is not sold out.

If the seats are being held for sale by other ticket outlets besides Ticketmaster, I believe they are still considered to be sold out. Don't know about San Jose but in many cities such as Auburn Hills they are adding more sections for sale because of demand.

FreddieCat wrote:

SweetCaroline wrote:

FreddieCat wrote: SAP is not sold out.

If the seats are being held for sale by other ticket outlets besides Ticketmaster, I believe they are still considered to be sold out. Don't know about San Jose but in many cities such as Auburn Hills they are adding more sections for sale because of demand.

These tickets held for: 02:58 Sec 217 Row 9, Seats link

SweetCaroline wrote:

FreddieCat wrote: SAP is not sold out.

If the seats are being held for sale by other ticket outlets besides Ticketmaster, I believe they are still considered to be sold out. Don't know about San Jose but in many cities such as Auburn Hills they are adding more sections for sale because of demand.

taptap wrote:

SweetCaroline wrote:

FreddieCat wrote: SAP is not sold out.

If the seats are being held for sale by other ticket outlets besides Ticketmaster, I believe they are still considered to be sold out. Don't know about San Jose but in many cities such as Auburn Hills they are adding more sections for sale because of demand.

Not everyone understands what second-sellers are. Second sellers buy tickets from the primary seller.  At this point they are SOLD.  Second sellers try to resell, but it doesn't matter if they do or do not, or at what price - the primary selling price has already been collected and counts toward the venue.  The only question left - which doesn't matter to the venue or the artists - is who will be sitting in that seat and at what additional price.  SOLD OUT means the primary seller has sold all tickets. Since the artists' revenues only depend on the primary seller, it doesn't matter to them what the secondary seller does, except as a matter of philosophy on reselling.  It doesn't affect their revenues one way or another.  This is why you can sometimes get tickets to sold out events - either they're available from a reseller (or scalper) or the primary seller has held some tickets in reserve to sell at high prices late in the game.  If the venue is listed as sold out, it doesn't matter how many tickets still reside in a secondary sellers hands - it's sold out. And here's the great news (if there is such a thing about secondary sellers); when secondary sellers snatch up a bunch of tickets fast it's because they think they'll be able to sell them at well above the primary selling price they put out originally, and thereby make good profit.  The other sign of high demand is the addition of new sections/seats by the venue and primary seller.  Adding those additional seats only happens when demand exceeds supply - they have no tickets left but lots of folks who still want tickets.  Both of these things - reseller tickets and additional seats added, are a sign of high demand, which clearly is the status of the QAL tour this summer - very high demand. I lolol at the determination of some so-called Queen fans to try and make them seem like a failure on this tour.  It's a done deal now - a huge success.  Brian May himself confirmed this, and between him and the venue stats, you can take that to the bank.

SweetCaroline wrote: Ha! Ha! Ha! Section 127 is another one of the gray-colored sections like Section 217 that have been added due to high demand for tickets. They are located almost behind the stage and were added after the original report of the venue being sold out!

SweetCaroline wrote: You're insane!

SweetCaroline wrote: Ha! Ha! Ha! Section 127 is another one of the gray-colored sections like Section 217 that have been added due to high demand for tickets. They are located almost behind the stage and were added after the original report of the venue being sold out!

taptap wrote:

SweetCaroline wrote: Ha! Ha! Ha! Section 127 is another one of the gray-colored sections like Section 217 that have been added due to high demand for tickets. They are located almost behind the stage and were added after the original report of the venue being sold out!

those are the cheap seats for non-fans like icy. oh wait, she's not going.  I guess those are the cheap seats for others then ;>

taptap wrote:

SweetCaroline wrote: Ha! Ha! Ha! Section 127 is another one of the gray-colored sections like Section 217 that have been added due to high demand for tickets. They are located almost behind the stage and were added after the original report of the venue being sold out!

those are the cheap seats for non-fans like icy. oh wait, she's not going.  I guess those are the cheap seats for others then ;>

FreddieCat wrote:

taptap wrote:

SweetCaroline wrote: Ha! Ha! Ha! Section 127 is another one of the gray-colored sections like Section 217 that have been added due to high demand for tickets. They are located almost behind the stage and were added after the original report of the venue being sold out!

those are the cheap seats for non-fans like icy. oh wait, she's not going.  I guess those are the cheap seats for others then ;>

San Jose has never been sold out. Cheap seats? I am a very low income person and if I have money in the budget I will get one. Its a big if. You make fun of people who can't afford to buy tickets?

taptap wrote:

FreddieCat wrote:

taptap wrote:

SweetCaroline wrote: Ha! Ha! Ha! Section 127 is another one of the gray-colored sections like Section 217 that have been added due to high demand for tickets. They are located almost behind the stage and were added after the original report of the venue being sold out!

those are the cheap seats for non-fans like icy. oh wait, she's not going.  I guess those are the cheap seats for others then ;>

San Jose has never been sold out. Cheap seats? I am a very low income person and if I have money in the budget I will get one. Its a big if. You make fun of people who can't afford to buy tickets?

I make fun of people on a Queen forum who hope for Queen's failure.

FreddieCat wrote:

taptap wrote:

SweetCaroline wrote: Ha! Ha! Ha! Section 127 is another one of the gray-colored sections like Section 217 that have been added due to high demand for tickets. They are located almost behind the stage and were added after the original report of the venue being sold out!

those are the cheap seats for non-fans like icy. oh wait, she's not going.  I guess those are the cheap seats for others then ;>

San Jose has never been sold out. Cheap seats? I am a very low income person and if I have money in the budget I will get one. Its a big if. You make fun of people who can't afford to buy tickets?

Bullet with Butterfly Wings wrote:

SweetCaroline wrote: You're insane!

You are a liar. Just hours ago you posted about being done with me forever...and clearly you aren't. Ha! Ha!

taptap wrote:

SweetCaroline wrote: Ha! Ha! Ha! Section 127 is another one of the gray-colored sections like Section 217 that have been added due to high demand for tickets. They are located almost behind the stage and were added after the original report of the venue being sold out!

those are the cheap seats for non-fans like icy. oh wait, she's not going.  I guess those are the cheap seats for others then ;>

inu-liger wrote:

Bullet with Butterfly Wings wrote:

SweetCaroline wrote: You're insane!

You are a liar. Just hours ago you posted about being done with me forever...and clearly you aren't. Ha! Ha!

Typical Carol. About as reliable as a late 90's Firestone tire.

taptap wrote:

SweetCaroline wrote: Ha! Ha! Ha! Section 127 is another one of the gray-colored sections like Section 217 that have been added due to high demand for tickets. They are located almost behind the stage and were added after the original report of the venue being sold out!

those are the cheap seats for non-fans like icy. oh wait, she's not going.  I guess those are the cheap seats for others then ;>

Seriously, grow the fuck up, you stupid bully.

inu-liger wrote: So you can be arsed to respond to legit posts regarding a venue's sales figures with yet more unsorted copy paste replies, yet you can't address the criticisms aimed at you. Very nice.

inu-liger wrote: So you can be arsed to respond to legit posts regarding a venue's sales figures with yet more unsorted copy paste replies, yet you can't address the criticisms aimed at you. Very nice.

Bullet with Butterfly Wings wrote: That's her way of doing things.

Stick wrote:

Bullet with Butterfly Wings wrote: That's her way of doing things.

;-)

Bullet with Butterfly Wings wrote: I would like to know if SC and taptap thinks Freddiecat is nice all of a sudden. Because they sure had a lot to say about her not being nice when FC was replying to me. So instead of SC being done with me forever, she proves she lies, can't keep her word, and lives with her head in the sand and/or up AL's ass. Alarming what can change...in hours at times.

Stick wrote:

Bullet with Butterfly Wings wrote: I would like to know if SC and taptap thinks Freddiecat is nice all of a sudden. Because they sure had a lot to say about her not being nice when FC was replying to me. So instead of SC being done with me forever, she proves she lies, can't keep her word, and lives with her head in the sand and/or up AL's ass. Alarming what can change...in hours at times.

I wouldn't count on a rational and to the point answer to that question. It would be like finding rabbit bones in a layer of dirt from the Jura time period, completely against all the evidence up to this point in time.

SweetCaroline wrote: It would be really nice if these threads could stay on topic. But no I did not talk about being banned until someone else, not icy, came over from QOL and mentioned it first. Then I answered them. I did not come to this website to complain about being banned. I came here to get away from the troublemakers and didn't expect them to follow me here. Yes, icy, I and others were banned over there from getting into conversations with you and Milkman. I have had you on ignore but when I slipped and tried to post something in a light hearted way it didn't matter. I still got banned. There is no responding directly to you or to Milkman without getting into a neverending shouting match, as is occurring here now. What I said about you at Amazon was NOT nasty. I was feeling sorry for you being in the clutches of Milkman. I really don't want to talk about this or anything else with you, so please find someone else and some other subject to talk about. I have nothing against any of the other posters in this forum or anywhere else--just you and Milkman and any other aliases he goes by! No more! I'm done with you, forever!

SweetCaroline wrote: FreddieCat, here's another San Jose update for you: "SAP Center San Jose, CA 16,075 05-10 $110 Venue sold out 1st day but sections added to Side/Behind stage so 97% sold out now."

Stick wrote:

inu-liger wrote: So you can be arsed to respond to legit posts regarding a venue's sales figures with yet more unsorted copy paste replies, yet you can't address the criticisms aimed at you. Very nice.

Ignoring stuff is what she does for a living. She ignores her own sad situation (middle aged woman with a schoolgirl crush on AL who can only find an outlet on Queen forums, that says it all) and ignores her own almost cliché character faults. Her psychology is so stereotypical she has no choice but to ignore it because confronting it would cause severe emotional stress. Most middle aged people suffer from this to some degree because they got stuck in their ways for lack of an objective view of themselves and the will to better themselves. It becomes really sad when they show up on the internet, talk themselves into a corner in no time at all, and have no alternative except to ignore and deny. Of course this doesn't stop because that would be considered by people like this as a form of admitting fault. Completely hopeless people who will have to lie to themselves until they die to keep themselves happy. Psychology is fun.

inu-liger wrote: "Poodle haired dads" << Very disrespectful. You know Brian May HATES that term poodle hair.

taptap wrote:

inu-liger wrote: "Poodle haired dads" << Very disrespectful. You know Brian May HATES that term poodle hair.

So true, we wouldn't want to be disrespectful of anyone, would we?  You might want to take a look at your posts on the previous page (if you're really concerned about being respectful of course, and not just trying to troll).

inu-liger wrote: edit

Mr.QueenFan wrote:

inu-liger wrote:

SweetCaroline wrote: Happy Mother's Day to all of the sweet and lovely mothers who post in this forum. Hope you have a lovely, blessed, warm and sunny day!

I feel so sorry for your grandson having such an ignorant grandmother such as yourself.

What is this? Inu, of all the people in Queenzone, you are the last one i would expect to have such words directed to another Queenzone member. Last year, you were the one being offended on a public forum wich lead to a HUGE and nasty discussion leading other Queenzone members - including me - to support you, and now this is the behaviour you have to offer toward others? I remember you threatening other Queenzoner some time ago with the police because of what he was saying towards you, and now you are here harassing and direct such words to a person YOU KNOW is a Grandmother and as far as i can tell didn't say anything to you to have such a negative reaction from you. She wished a happy mother's day and as a reply she got your words?! I realy feel you own her an apology for these words. These are very strong words, and you should be more sensible towards people. You simply don't say things like this to a grandmother, period! And in this case it's a person who already made it clear that she wants to be left alone. And i'm not just talking about these words. You have said pretty nasty stuff to SweetCaroline on other posts too. I thought you weren't the person to write such things, or to have such behaviour. Guess i was wrong! Of course you're not the only one harassing Sweetcaroline. There are more - and you know who you are! --------------------------------- ----------------------------------- To SweetCaroline: Don't let them ruin your day. Be as passionate as you want. Most of them are pissed because they aren't going to attend the concerts, and others just want to ruin your experience. They want you to feel as miserable as them. Don't allow them that! Some of them even have tickets, yet they have the nerve to come here and only talk bad things about Queen+Adam Lambert. I never heard of something like this. People bashing the artist who they are paying to see live! Don't pay attention to them, and enjoy the concert. I hope to read a review of your experience of the concert. And by the way, who cares about the opinion of some Queenzoners about Adam, when you have Slash, Queen, Rob Halford (the heavy metal legend), and other brilliant artists stating the obvious? Adam is a great artist and his voice is unique. Don't you think you're wasting much time replying to these people? They only want to make you feel bad, so don't waste your time arguing with them. And don't expect them to change their views after the concert because even if they do, they're not going to admit it, only for the sake of a nice argument with you. Use your energy for better and more positive things than to be arguing with people who don't have an honest agenda towards you, and clearly are not nice to you.

SweetCaroline wrote: I'm not a victim -- that description belongs to icy and icy alone!

I'm quite grown up I assure you! LOLOLOLOL

Sparkles wrote: Queenzone is a public forum and anyone can post here. It doesnt belong to anyone. Fans and non-fans can post here. And if there is a problem with following some supposed set of rules then the moderators will handle it. No one should be attacked because they arent following someone's supposed set of rules and etiquette. Only the mods are mods. Fans arent mods and dont dictate what can and cant be posted here. Contact the mods if you have a problem. Everyone posting on this site is a "self-invited" guest. I see absolutely nothing wrong with what Sweet Caroline and tap tap post here. I do see harassing, bullying, and name calling from some others here. Frankly, its ridiculous that someone cant post here without having their posts harassed. Who cares if someone is "overzealous"? Get over it. Sweet Caroline isnt going to change her attitude about Adam Lambert and she doesnt have to. If you dont like it just skip her comments and go on to another topic of conversation. Its really very simple. "You want these attacks to stop, then start following our rules." Ridiculous. They arent "our" rules. They are rules of the website and if there is a problem the admins or mods will take appropriate action. What gives anyone the right to "ATTACK" anyone else on this board. Sorry, but seniority here doesnt give you the right to attack someone.

SweetCaroline wrote: Well said -- a voice of reason! Thank you so much!

SweetCaroline wrote: Thank you for your kind words. I'm back after spending a belated Mother's Day celebration with my adorable grandson and granddaughter. I don't know who the "new" obnoxious "Stick" is but he sounds familiar. Looking forward to the first show in Chicago on June 19th and sharing that magnificent experience with like-minded QAL fans! Came to QOL in December, 2011 after the Queen/Adam EMA collaboration and to this forum in March with nothing but positive motives! I have no control over the trolls and stalkers who have followed me there and here and have nothing but pity for such obviously sad people!

SweetCaroline wrote: Overzealous? Guilty as charged! "Humble maturity?" What the hell is that? I'm not a victim -- that description belongs to icy and icy alone! I'm quite grown up I assure you! LOLOLOLOL

Sparkles wrote: Queenzone is a public forum and anyone can post here. It doesnt belong to anyone. Fans and non-fans can post here. And if there is a problem with following some supposed set of rules then the moderators will handle it. No one should be attacked because they arent following someone's supposed set of rules and etiquette. Only the mods are mods. Fans arent mods and dont dictate what can and cant be posted here. Contact the mods if you have a problem. Everyone posting on this site is a "self-invited" guest. I see absolutely nothing wrong with what Sweet Caroline and tap tap post here. I do see harassing, bullying, and name calling from some others here. Frankly, its ridiculous that someone cant post here without having their posts harassed. Who cares if someone is "overzealous"? Get over it. Sweet Caroline isnt going to change her attitude about Adam Lambert and she doesnt have to. If you dont like it just skip her comments and go on to another topic of conversation. Its really very simple. "You want these attacks to stop, then start following our rules." Ridiculous. They arent "our" rules. They are rules of the website and if there is a problem the admins or mods will take appropriate action. What gives anyone the right to "ATTACK" anyone else on this board. Sorry, but seniority here doesnt give you the right to attack someone.

Stick wrote:

SweetCaroline wrote: Well said -- a voice of reason! Thank you so much!

You wouldn't recognize a voice of reason if it raped you in the shower. Don't you get it? People see right through you. You have posted a hell of a lot of material for people to work with and it's more than enough to analyse you and conclude what has been concluded. The fact that you can't let yourself see it is an inherent part of it. Your own character is something you haven't dared to look at for ages and ages and this is the result. You just let it stew and stew and rot and made tons of excuses to yourself about the problems you've encountered because of it. Others don't swallow those excuses and will make you confront them but you are to far gone to even see the reasoning behind it. You are completely hopeless and will only be happy lying to yourself and getting the support of equal slow minded people with the same character fault. Go find some people who don't know you well enough to hate your guts. You came here because it got to hot beneath your feet at Queenonline after you've been told of multiple times and banned. Well, sorry little girl but lots of people visit both places and will try to make you see that your bitch character isn't something that will be accepted anywhere if you stay long enough to show who you are. Oh, and if your still wondering where this "obnoxious Stick" suddenly came from: I've been reading Queenonline and Queenzone for years and years and have only posted now and then when I felt like it or wanted to know something about Queen. Until recently I could laugh at any insanity that was posted (mostly here of course) but that suddenly stopped when even reading the conversations became fucking irritating because of some really, really disturbing personalities that just wouldn't shut up or listen to any form of reason. You being a major one of them. If even lurkers get sick and tired of you it has to mean something.

Bullet with Butterfly Wings wrote:

Sparkles wrote: Queenzone is a public forum and anyone can post here. It doesnt belong to anyone. Fans and non-fans can post here. And if there is a problem with following some supposed set of rules then the moderators will handle it. No one should be attacked because they arent following someone's supposed set of rules and etiquette. Only the mods are mods. Fans arent mods and dont dictate what can and cant be posted here. Contact the mods if you have a problem. Everyone posting on this site is a "self-invited" guest. I see absolutely nothing wrong with what Sweet Caroline and tap tap post here. I do see harassing, bullying, and name calling from some others here. Frankly, its ridiculous that someone cant post here without having their posts harassed. Who cares if someone is "overzealous"? Get over it. Sweet Caroline isnt going to change her attitude about Adam Lambert and she doesnt have to. If you dont like it just skip her comments and go on to another topic of conversation. Its really very simple. "You want these attacks to stop, then start following our rules." Ridiculous. They arent "our" rules. They are rules of the website and if there is a problem the admins or mods will take appropriate action. What gives anyone the right to "ATTACK" anyone else on this board. Sorry, but seniority here doesnt give you the right to attack someone.

I have said a few times QZ is a public forum. I don't think that escapes notice. Indeed only the mods are mods. I think SC and taptap want/need a convo just between the both of them. Have you not noticed their attacks on some people or do you choose not to call that out? I wish the lies would stop, or at least when it's posted I'm the reason for a month long ban, and many more bans would be backed up. SC/CNB can't back those claims up.

Sparkles wrote:

Bullet with Butterfly Wings wrote:

Sparkles wrote: Queenzone is a public forum and anyone can post here. It doesnt belong to anyone. Fans and non-fans can post here. And if there is a problem with following some supposed set of rules then the moderators will handle it. No one should be attacked because they arent following someone's supposed set of rules and etiquette. Only the mods are mods. Fans arent mods and dont dictate what can and cant be posted here. Contact the mods if you have a problem. Everyone posting on this site is a "self-invited" guest. I see absolutely nothing wrong with what Sweet Caroline and tap tap post here. I do see harassing, bullying, and name calling from some others here. Frankly, its ridiculous that someone cant post here without having their posts harassed. Who cares if someone is "overzealous"? Get over it. Sweet Caroline isnt going to change her attitude about Adam Lambert and she doesnt have to. If you dont like it just skip her comments and go on to another topic of conversation. Its really very simple. "You want these attacks to stop, then start following our rules." Ridiculous. They arent "our" rules. They are rules of the website and if there is a problem the admins or mods will take appropriate action. What gives anyone the right to "ATTACK" anyone else on this board. Sorry, but seniority here doesnt give you the right to attack someone.

I have said a few times QZ is a public forum. I don't think that escapes notice. Indeed only the mods are mods. I think SC and taptap want/need a convo just between the both of them. Have you not noticed their attacks on some people or do you choose not to call that out? I wish the lies would stop, or at least when it's posted I'm the reason for a month long ban, and many more bans would be backed up. SC/CNB can't back those claims up.

I think SC and taptap would be more than happy to have a convo with someone who wants to have a convo. Not just rehashing of the same crap over and over. Talking about banning, posting... etc.... Its so redundant. Are you going to mention that 1000 more times about being banned? My god. I bet a month from now you are still going on about it. People dont want to have a convo with someone who only talks about 3 things in every conversation. And just for the record, I read at QOL as well and have you noticed that Adam fans rarely post there anymore? They dont want to be harassed anymore. And yes, I know this for a fact.

SweetCaroline wrote: Thanks, Sparkles! You're right that I would welcome a conversation with people who are not insane (and ridiculous)! I think I'll go over to the videos thread right now and post one of my favorite Adam videos just because I can!

inu-liger wrote: Not just MY problem. When you post essentially as a self-invited guest from another fandom, you are EXPECTED to follow the rules and etiquette just as we too would be expected to do the same in your lot's forums. When you have already received a ban or two for not doing that, that should be a wake up call to reassess your behaviour on our forums. You've pissed off a lot of Queen fans already, and I'm just bluntly laying out as I did above what you need to do to start building a proper connection with our lot. You want these attacks to stop, then start following our rules.

taptap wrote:

inu-liger wrote: Not just MY problem. When you post essentially as a self-invited guest from another fandom, you are EXPECTED to follow the rules and etiquette just as we too would be expected to do the same in your lot's forums. When you have already received a ban or two for not doing that, that should be a wake up call to reassess your behaviour on our forums. You've pissed off a lot of Queen fans already, and I'm just bluntly laying out as I did above what you need to do to start building a proper connection with our lot. You want these attacks to stop, then start following our rules.

You have been trying to censor and get rid of SC and myself ever since we arrived here.  You first tried intimidation and then threats, and when you tried to get Barb on your side, she refused to take part in your agenda.  Get real - you're the problem here, not us.  We're fans, and we're not second class citizens, no matter how much you'd like to pretend we are.  We will continue to support Queen and Adam Lambert, no matter how much you wish we wouldn't, here or on any other forum that's open to the public.  This isn't your personal version of a private men's club.

FreddieCat wrote: SC and TT are playing basketball. SC goes for the hoop shot (spams the threads) and TT guards her (insults everyone who complains about it). Then you bait and troll to get Queen fans to respond to your provoking posts so you can insult them again. I agree with Inu. SC and TT, you too often act like spoiled rotten bad guests. Should we join an AL forum and pull your crap on his fans? Out of respect for AL, the answer is no, we shouldn't.

FreddieCat wrote: Out of respect for AL, the answer is no, we shouldn't.

taptap wrote:Spamming the thread?  She's posting about Adam Lambert and Queen in threads that are about Queen, AL, and QAL.

inu-liger wrote:

taptap wrote:Spamming the thread?  She's posting about Adam Lambert and Queen in threads that are about Queen, AL, and QAL.

First off, re-read that post closely. He said threads, as in PLURAL. And not exclusively in this subforum either; When you and Carol first joined here after your QOL bans were initiated, you both hijacked various threads with your AL spamming and hardly contributed to Queen discussions with comments that DIDN'T inject AL whether it was topically appropriate or not. And that spamming is what got this subforum repurposed here in the end, because YourValentine and Richard Orchard got too many complaints from a lot of people about your and Carol's spammy behaviour. The same type of behaviour that contributed to your bans no doubt on QOL after several warnings that you both violated.

inu-liger wrote: "You've tried to make these threads a referendum on SC and me" ^ Says one half of the 'Blame Everything On Icy' Team. You have no legitimate ground to stand on.

taptap wrote:

inu-liger wrote: "You've tried to make these threads a referendum on SC and me" ^ Says one half of the 'Blame Everything On Icy' Team. You have no legitimate ground to stand on.

Bullshit.

inu-liger wrote:

taptap wrote:

inu-liger wrote: "You've tried to make these threads a referendum on SC and me" ^ Says one half of the 'Blame Everything On Icy' Team. You have no legitimate ground to stand on.

Bullshit.

Certainly nowhere near as bullshit as your attempt at silencing her privately over QOL private messaging with the threats of forwarding her posts over to some "legal commission." Now is that something you will address, or are you just going to continue ignoring doing that because you know no such "legal commission" exists in the first place, even though we've been pointing this out for a while now?

inu-liger wrote:

taptap wrote:

inu-liger wrote: "You've tried to make these threads a referendum on SC and me" ^ Says one half of the 'Blame Everything On Icy' Team. You have no legitimate ground to stand on.

Bullshit.

Certainly nowhere near as bullshit as your attempt at silencing her privately over QOL private messaging with the threats of forwarding her posts over to some "legal commission." Now is that something you will address, or are you just going to continue ignoring doing that because you know no such "legal commission" exists in the first place, even though we've been pointing this out for a while now?

taptap wrote:

FreddieCat wrote: SC and TT are playing basketball. SC goes for the hoop shot (spams the threads) and TT guards her (insults everyone who complains about it). Then you bait and troll to get Queen fans to respond to your provoking posts so you can insult them again. I agree with Inu. SC and TT, you too often act like spoiled rotten bad guests. Should we join an AL forum and pull your crap on his fans? Out of respect for AL, the answer is no, we shouldn't.

I am not a guest here, I'm a forum member, with the same rights as every other forum member - again, it's a public forum, not your private club.  And guess who you speak for?  You.  That's it.  I don't care where you go online or what you say on other sites because - wait for it - it's none of my business.  I'm not a busy-body who tries to make what others say and think my business - unlike you.  Chill out, scroll, or whatever, but you can forget trying to be the voice of Queen fans because as a Queen fan myself I can confidently assert that you're not.  You're the voice of inu and icy - congrats on the company you keep.   And everyone knows who MrQueenFan meant when he said inu wasn't the only one harassing Lambert fans here.  Believe me, none of this has gone un-noted by long-time members and lurkers alike according to my personal inbox. And by the way, you're absolutely right when you say that I defend SC.  Spamming the thread?  She's posting about Queen, Adam Lambert, and the QAL tour in threads that are about Queen, Adam Lambert, and the QAL tour.  And what are you and inu and icy posting about in these same threads?  How you hate what SC posts about Queen, Adam Lambert and the QAL tour.  Are you seeing a pattern here?  Because if not, let me explain in it simple words.  I find it disgusting that so much shit is thrown at fans who are just being enthusiastic and honest in their enjoyment of an artist.  Yes, it's disgusting, and I'm so glad that I defend SC against bullies rather than being one of those who defends the bullies.  Again, congrats on the company you keep.

inu-liger wrote: I've been psychologically assessed a couple of times in the past decade, and no I am not insane :-) And it's not "another user," it is yourself under your QOL alias "Mithril" to which these private posts have been attributed to you by Icy.

Bullet with Butterfly Wings wrote:

taptap wrote:

FreddieCat wrote: SC and TT are playing basketball. SC goes for the hoop shot (spams the threads) and TT guards her (insults everyone who complains about it). Then you bait and troll to get Queen fans to respond to your provoking posts so you can insult them again. I agree with Inu. SC and TT, you too often act like spoiled rotten bad guests. Should we join an AL forum and pull your crap on his fans? Out of respect for AL, the answer is no, we shouldn't.

I am not a guest here, I'm a forum member, with the same rights as every other forum member - again, it's a public forum, not your private club.  And guess who you speak for?  You.  That's it.  I don't care where you go online or what you say on other sites because - wait for it - it's none of my business.  I'm not a busy-body who tries to make what others say and think my business - unlike you.  Chill out, scroll, or whatever, but you can forget trying to be the voice of Queen fans because as a Queen fan myself I can confidently assert that you're not.  You're the voice of inu and icy - congrats on the company you keep.   And everyone knows who MrQueenFan meant when he said inu wasn't the only one harassing Lambert fans here.  Believe me, none of this has gone un-noted by long-time members and lurkers alike according to my personal inbox. And by the way, you're absolutely right when you say that I defend SC.  Spamming the thread?  She's posting about Queen, Adam Lambert, and the QAL tour in threads that are about Queen, Adam Lambert, and the QAL tour.  And what are you and inu and icy posting about in these same threads?  How you hate what SC posts about Queen, Adam Lambert and the QAL tour.  Are you seeing a pattern here?  Because if not, let me explain in it simple words.  I find it disgusting that so much shit is thrown at fans who are just being enthusiastic and honest in their enjoyment of an artist.  Yes, it's disgusting, and I'm so glad that I defend SC against bullies rather than being one of those who defends the bullies.  Again, congrats on the company you keep.

Still a major bitch mithril/taptap. You don't like anyone calling you out on your bullshit, and countless times you have tried to defend SC/CNB...as always doing a shitty job of it. To see you go after inu and Freddi cat...the very same way you did with me. I expect a tantrum from you where you post that you copy/keep/threaten to forward posts on. I can tell it's coming, I just wonder who will get it. Don't worry, I know the reasons for you doing that on QOL. You pitiful person, thankfully many see right through you. Congrats on the company you keep with SC...the very one you feel you have to defend, who goes into rages about nothing. I'd rather chat with someone who views things from all sides. You and SC don't, never did or never will. Very telling that you have the gall to say who is a Queen fan in your mind.

inu-liger wrote:

taptap wrote:

inu-liger wrote: "You've tried to make these threads a referendum on SC and me" ^ Says one half of the 'Blame Everything On Icy' Team. You have no legitimate ground to stand on.

Bullshit.

Certainly nowhere near as bullshit as your attempt at silencing her privately over QOL private messaging with the threats of forwarding her posts over to some "legal commission." Now is that something you will address, or are you just going to continue ignoring doing that because you know no such "legal commission" exists in the first place, even though we've been pointing this out for a while now?

Bullet with Butterfly Wings wrote:

inu-liger wrote:

taptap wrote:

inu-liger wrote: "You've tried to make these threads a referendum on SC and me" ^ Says one half of the 'Blame Everything On Icy' Team. You have no legitimate ground to stand on.

Bullshit.

Certainly nowhere near as bullshit as your attempt at silencing her privately over QOL private messaging with the threats of forwarding her posts over to some "legal commission." Now is that something you will address, or are you just going to continue ignoring doing that because you know no such "legal commission" exists in the first place, even though we've been pointing this out for a while now?

Inu, she posted the legal commission threats on the board in "her" AL thread. A mod called her out on it. Went as far to say she copied/kept my posts, then stated she would forward them. Not long after, she cussed me out via PM, which I still have. It's easier to blame me for bans/issues than to take a long look at themselves.

taptap wrote:

Bullet with Butterfly Wings wrote:

taptap wrote:

FreddieCat wrote: SC and TT are playing basketball. SC goes for the hoop shot (spams the threads) and TT guards her (insults everyone who complains about it). Then you bait and troll to get Queen fans to respond to your provoking posts so you can insult them again. I agree with Inu. SC and TT, you too often act like spoiled rotten bad guests. Should we join an AL forum and pull your crap on his fans? Out of respect for AL, the answer is no, we shouldn't.

I am not a guest here, I'm a forum member, with the same rights as every other forum member - again, it's a public forum, not your private club.  And guess who you speak for?  You.  That's it.  I don't care where you go online or what you say on other sites because - wait for it - it's none of my business.  I'm not a busy-body who tries to make what others say and think my business - unlike you.  Chill out, scroll, or whatever, but you can forget trying to be the voice of Queen fans because as a Queen fan myself I can confidently assert that you're not.  You're the voice of inu and icy - congrats on the company you keep.   And everyone knows who MrQueenFan meant when he said inu wasn't the only one harassing Lambert fans here.  Believe me, none of this has gone un-noted by long-time members and lurkers alike according to my personal inbox. And by the way, you're absolutely right when you say that I defend SC.  Spamming the thread?  She's posting about Queen, Adam Lambert, and the QAL tour in threads that are about Queen, Adam Lambert, and the QAL tour.  And what are you and inu and icy posting about in these same threads?  How you hate what SC posts about Queen, Adam Lambert and the QAL tour.  Are you seeing a pattern here?  Because if not, let me explain in it simple words.  I find it disgusting that so much shit is thrown at fans who are just being enthusiastic and honest in their enjoyment of an artist.  Yes, it's disgusting, and I'm so glad that I defend SC against bullies rather than being one of those who defends the bullies.  Again, congrats on the company you keep.

Still a major bitch mithril/taptap. You don't like anyone calling you out on your bullshit, and countless times you have tried to defend SC/CNB...as always doing a shitty job of it. To see you go after inu and Freddi cat...the very same way you did with me. I expect a tantrum from you where you post that you copy/keep/threaten to forward posts on. I can tell it's coming, I just wonder who will get it. Don't worry, I know the reasons for you doing that on QOL. You pitiful person, thankfully many see right through you. Congrats on the company you keep with SC...the very one you feel you have to defend, who goes into rages about nothing. I'd rather chat with someone who views things from all sides. You and SC don't, never did or never will. Very telling that you have the gall to say who is a Queen fan in your mind.

Seriously icy, all anyone here needs to do is look at your post here (or anywhere else on this site for that matter) to see why multiple people at all these sites you frequent are probably forwarding your posts to someone.  You're obsession with other posters makes you sound really nuts.

SweetCaroline wrote: Barb set up this QAL forum so that the folks on the "Serious Discussion" threads about Queen could be free of posts about Adam. So the question is why have they come over to the QAL threads to complain about the people who are legitimately posting here? These threads have been hijacked more than the ones in the Serious Discussion forum before there wasn't another place available for posting. If you don't want to talk about the upcoming summer tour, then go back to the discussions that are about other subjects. It is such a simple solution to all of this unnecessary rankling!

Bullet with Butterfly Wings wrote:

Boy, you can't talk for yourself without trying to drag others into it. Only you are fucked up, dumb, sad, control crazy enough to threaten that on a public board. Don't you think the amount of times you posted about keeping/copying and the threats to forward my posts made you look obsessive? It really does. 

And pray tell how you probably know people are forwarding my posts to someone. You and SC alone have shown and proved the ugly side of being a Glambert.

SweetCaroline wrote: taptap, back on topic -- GREAT!!!!! This thread is about the summer arena tour, icy! Go away!

taptap wrote:

SweetCaroline wrote: Barb set up this QAL forum so that the folks on the "Serious Discussion" threads about Queen could be free of posts about Adam. So the question is why have they come over to the QAL threads to complain about the people who are legitimately posting here? These threads have been hijacked more than the ones in the Serious Discussion forum before there wasn't another place available for posting. If you don't want to talk about the upcoming summer tour, then go back to the discussions that are about other subjects. It is such a simple solution to all of this unnecessary rankling!

They haven't talked about Queen at all.  They're here simply to follow you (and me I guess - yay, I'm famous!) so they can post about your posts.  It makes perfect sense (to someone obviously).

taptap wrote:

SweetCaroline wrote: taptap, back on topic -- GREAT!!!!! This thread is about the summer arena tour, icy! Go away!

What?  I thought this thread was about icy!   Well I think icy thinks it's about icy at any rate.

taptap wrote:

Bullet with Butterfly Wings wrote:

Boy, you can't talk for yourself without trying to drag others into it. Only you are fucked up, dumb, sad, control crazy enough to threaten that on a public board. Don't you think the amount of times you posted about keeping/copying and the threats to forward my posts made you look obsessive? It really does. 

And pray tell how you probably know people are forwarding my posts to someone. You and SC alone have shown and proved the ugly side of being a Glambert.

Because you've said so here on QZ about a zillion times.  Duh.

Bullet with Butterfly Wings wrote:

taptap wrote:

Bullet with Butterfly Wings wrote:

Boy, you can't talk for yourself without trying to drag others into it. Only you are fucked up, dumb, sad, control crazy enough to threaten that on a public board. Don't you think the amount of times you posted about keeping/copying and the threats to forward my posts made you look obsessive? It really does. 

And pray tell how you probably know people are forwarding my posts to someone. You and SC alone have shown and proved the ugly side of being a Glambert.

Because you've said so here on QZ about a zillion times.  Duh.

Duh. And you are the self absorbed one who copied/kept and made threats to forward my posts on QOL to a legal commission. And to add insult, you couldn't do that by yourself, so you wanted more to follow your lead. Tough shit for you, people can and do make up their own minds without you trying to lead them on.

inu-liger wrote:

taptap wrote:

inu-liger wrote: "You've tried to make these threads a referendum on SC and me" ^ Says one half of the 'Blame Everything On Icy' Team. You have no legitimate ground to stand on.

Bullshit.

Certainly nowhere near as bullshit as your attempt at silencing her privately over QOL private messaging with the threats of forwarding her posts over to some "legal commission." Now is that something you will address, or are you just going to continue ignoring doing that because you know no such "legal commission" exists in the first place, even though we've been pointing this out for a while now?

inu-liger wrote: You've pissed off a lot of Queen fans already, and I'm just bluntly laying out as I did above what you need to do to start building a proper connection with our lot. You want these attacks to stop, then start following our rules.

taptap wrote:

Bullet with Butterfly Wings wrote:

taptap wrote:

Bullet with Butterfly Wings wrote:

Boy, you can't talk for yourself without trying to drag others into it. Only you are fucked up, dumb, sad, control crazy enough to threaten that on a public board. Don't you think the amount of times you posted about keeping/copying and the threats to forward my posts made you look obsessive? It really does. 

And pray tell how you probably know people are forwarding my posts to someone. You and SC alone have shown and proved the ugly side of being a Glambert.

Because you've said so here on QZ about a zillion times.  Duh.

Duh. And you are the self absorbed one who copied/kept and made threats to forward my posts on QOL to a legal commission. And to add insult, you couldn't do that by yourself, so you wanted more to follow your lead. Tough shit for you, people can and do make up their own minds without you trying to lead them on.

I really don't understand.  You asked how I knew people were forwarding your posts, and I replied 'because you've said so here on QZ about a zillion times'.  Everyone who reads this sub-forum knows this is true.  But you ignored that obvious answer (that everyone knows) and went off on yet another tangent about other posts at other forums.  Try to focus on the conversation you and I are having, icy, not the one you're having with yourself on some other site.

inu-liger wrote: To be very honest, I've been under a lot of sleep deprivation over the last two months and some stress, though the stress factor in itself hasn't been as bad as it was a few months ago. Depression has been coming back though, as it routinely has off and on over the last few years.

taptap wrote: Wow, Ticket Master in Canada is offering a VIP package which includes a seat on-stage for $1195! The demand for these tickets must be through the roof to make that sort of high-priced offer!  I'll be very interested to see what kind of fans buy these.  Ones with money, obviously, so my money is on the older and more fanatical Queen and AL fans.  As cool as this would be on the one hand, I really think this is a bit to up-close and personal for me, personally, even if I was willing to shell out that amount.  Still, with all the perks that go with it, I bet these fans will have a great time and wonderful memories of a huge legend's legacy appearance.  More power to QAL for having the sort of demand that allows this. Here's the website listed to purchase these tickets: http://www.ticketmaster.ca/event/10004C65B8EA7916?did=vipstageto Update: Apparently this is an update available to Ultimate VIP package holders.  The password is OnstageVIP.  I have no idea if this applies to all Canadian venues, or if it includes any venues in the US.  If I see an update I'll post it.

inu-liger wrote: Incidentally, that IS part of the sleep deprivation issue having two little ones myself as well, the younger one just a few months old now. I don't personally feel it's a major reason in itself, taking the depression related issues into account, but I'm hoping regardless these things will balance out soon enough, I'm hoping you'll understand what I mean by this.

inu-liger wrote: Incidentally, that IS part of the sleep deprivation issue having two little ones myself as well, the younger one just a few months old now. I don't personally feel it's a major reason in itself, taking the depression related issues into account, but I'm hoping regardless these things will balance out soon enough, I'm hoping you'll understand what I mean by this.

SweetCaroline wrote:

inu-liger wrote: Incidentally, that IS part of the sleep deprivation issue having two little ones myself as well, the younger one just a few months old now. I don't personally feel it's a major reason in itself, taking the depression related issues into account, but I'm hoping regardless these things will balance out soon enough, I'm hoping you'll understand what I mean by this.

Of course I understand! I've been through the raising of my own children when they were little (without their Daddy) and also my two little grandchildren. It is very draining both physically and emotionally. But I always say that the joys outnumber the sorrows! BTW I was responding to the Milkman who was mocking ME on Amazon when I mentioned a woman from Canada (diid not call her "icy"). I didn't go there to talk about her. And what I said about her was empathetic, not nasty. Milkman has portrayed it otherwise to her and unfortunately she bought into it! I believe that took place 2 years ago, not recently as she would have you believe! Why must everything always be about icy? This is supposed to be about the QAL tour!!!!!

Queenfansunite wrote: I think the bullies are now clearly revealed Here's wishing Queen and Adam Lambert a great Tour link

inu-liger wrote: To be very honest, I've been under a lot of sleep deprivation over the last two months and some stress, though the stress factor in itself hasn't been as bad as it was a few months ago. Depression has been coming back though, as it routinely has off and on over the last few years.

Mr.QueenFan wrote:

inu-liger wrote: To be very honest, I've been under a lot of sleep deprivation over the last two months and some stress, though the stress factor in itself hasn't been as bad as it was a few months ago. Depression has been coming back though, as it routinely has off and on over the last few years.

I understand and i'm sorry to hear about it. I hope that you start to feel better in the future so we can have more positive discussions about the band we all love. By the way, congratulations on your two children :-)

Bullet with Butterfly Wings wrote:

Mr.QueenFan wrote:

inu-liger wrote: To be very honest, I've been under a lot of sleep deprivation over the last two months and some stress, though the stress factor in itself hasn't been as bad as it was a few months ago. Depression has been coming back though, as it routinely has off and on over the last few years.

I understand and i'm sorry to hear about it. I hope that you start to feel better in the future so we can have more positive discussions about the band we all love. By the way, congratulations on your two children :-)

Thanks for being understanding towards inu. He doesn't need me to say this, but he is a very good guy. I could try to explain myself, but it wouldn't do any good. And will likely leave here to posted/gossiped about elsewhere.

Mr.QueenFan wrote:

Bullet with Butterfly Wings wrote:

Mr.QueenFan wrote:

inu-liger wrote: To be very honest, I've been under a lot of sleep deprivation over the last two months and some stress, though the stress factor in itself hasn't been as bad as it was a few months ago. Depression has been coming back though, as it routinely has off and on over the last few years.

I understand and i'm sorry to hear about it. I hope that you start to feel better in the future so we can have more positive discussions about the band we all love. By the way, congratulations on your two children :-)

Thanks for being understanding towards inu. He doesn't need me to say this, but he is a very good guy. I could try to explain myself, but it wouldn't do any good. And will likely leave here to posted/gossiped about elsewhere.

You don't need to explain yourself to me. I believe you have your own personal reasons for doing what you are doing but the thing is If you two can't solve your issues from the past, simply don't talk to each other. Me and other Queenzoners have nothing to do about what was said in the other forums. That is something for the two of you to solve. We just want to have a pleasant time in QZ.

Queenfansunite wrote: Hi I would just like to remind you all, that means everyone here in this forum, that my free speech means nothing to me as I don't have any validation in the eyes of my peers and I am worth nothing Thanks goodbye P.sToday is my birthday, so spit on it. Or conversely...... Hi, I would just like to spit in the eyes of my peers today as all in this forum means is Nothing good , as You don't have any validation And So I remind everyone here today , my worth - My birthday Free speech! Thanks Bye P...s

Bullet with Butterfly Wings wrote:

Queenfansunite wrote: Hi I would just like to remind you all, that means everyone here in this forum, that my free speech means nothing to me as I don't have any validation in the eyes of my peers and I am worth nothing Thanks goodbye P.sToday is my birthday, so spit on it. Or conversely...... Hi, I would just like to spit in the eyes of my peers today as all in this forum means is Nothing good , as You don't have any validation And So I remind everyone here today , my worth - My birthday Free speech! Thanks Bye P...s

WTF? Your free speech that you bleated on about many times now means nothing to you as people aren't validating you. LOL. I wonder how long your bye will last until you can sneak your way in again? I'd advise people not to click on your links as you are just after attention again. There's not a fan base I would wish your total bullshit on. Oh wait, now you contradict yourself in your same post here. Spit on yourself dude. Buh bye.

taptap wrote: Hmm, there's an interesting teaser on Queen's fb page: For the first time in 30 years, Queen are heading back to......[stay tuned] Another concert date to be added?  South America?  South Africa?  If they add any other European or Latin American dates, I'm sure the UK will be added as a closer as well.

taptap wrote:

taptap wrote: Hmm, there's an interesting teaser on Queen's fb page: For the first time in 30 years, Queen are heading back to......[stay tuned] Another concert date to be added? South America? South Africa? If they add any other European or Latin American dates, I'm sure the UK will be added as a closer as well.

Someone is suggesting it could be the 2015 Rock in Rio, since that would put their last visit there 30 years ago. That would be cool, and give them a nice break after the 2014 summer tour.

taptap wrote:

taptap wrote: Hmm, there's an interesting teaser on Queen's fb page: For the first time in 30 years, Queen are heading back to......[stay tuned] Another concert date to be added?  South America?  South Africa?  If they add any other European or Latin American dates, I'm sure the UK will be added as a closer as well.

Someone is suggesting it could be the 2015 Rock in Rio, since that would put their last visit there 30 years ago.  That would be cool, and give them a nice break after the 2014 summer tour.

inu-liger wrote:

taptap wrote:

taptap wrote: Hmm, there's an interesting teaser on Queen's fb page: For the first time in 30 years, Queen are heading back to......[stay tuned] Another concert date to be added?  South America?  South Africa?  If they add any other European or Latin American dates, I'm sure the UK will be added as a closer as well.

Someone is suggesting it could be the 2015 Rock in Rio, since that would put their last visit there 30 years ago.  That would be cool, and give them a nice break after the 2014 summer tour.

Couldn't be Rock in Rio for two reasons: 1) Rock In Rio was first held in 1985, not 1984 2) Queen played Rio in 2008 with Paul Rodgers

inu-liger wrote: My money's on Australia. I'm highly doubtful it will be ANY of the RiR festivals.

inu-liger wrote: My money's on Australia. I'm highly doubtful it will be ANY of the RiR festivals.

inu-liger wrote: My money's on Australia. I'm highly doubtful it will be ANY of the RiR festivals.

taptap wrote: This is one of the most fun QAL performances at the Hammersmith last year: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fYlOnKAgj-4

taptap wrote: This is one of the most fun QAL performances at the Hammersmith last year: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fYlOnKAgj-4

delete - duplicate below.

taptap wrote:

SweetCaroline wrote:

taptap wrote: This is one of the most fun QAL performances at the Hammersmith last year: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fYlOnKAgj-4

And then he changed his ripped pants: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hL-ABDZBt8Y

Aack!  Hated those silver legging things.  I also hope he never never never wears a onsie on stage.  No matter how much freddie liked them they're gross, only out-grossed by speedos!  :<

taptap wrote:

taptap wrote:

SweetCaroline wrote:

taptap wrote: This is one of the most fun QAL performances at the Hammersmith last year: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fYlOnKAgj-4

And then he changed his ripped pants: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hL-ABDZBt8Y

Aack! Hated those silver legging things. I also hope he never never never wears a onsie on stage. No matter how much freddie liked them they're gross, only out-grossed by speedos! :<

SweetCaroline wrote:

taptap wrote:

taptap wrote:

SweetCaroline wrote:

taptap wrote: This is one of the most fun QAL performances at the Hammersmith last year: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fYlOnKAgj-4

And then he changed his ripped pants: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hL-ABDZBt8Y

Aack! Hated those silver legging things. I also hope he never never never wears a onsie on stage. No matter how much freddie liked them they're gross, only out-grossed by speedos! :<

No worry -- I think the days of the onesie are over! And, fortunately, Adam believes in being sexy without being naked!

SweetCaroline wrote: Dr. Brian May ?@DrBrianMay 5m Well, folks, my tweeting hasn't been scintillating of late. Sorry. But we had our first QUEEN rehearsal day with Adam Lambert today. YAY !

taptap wrote: @DrBrianMay Well, all I can say so far @AdamAddict is ... if you want to be ready, get your EARLY Queen albums out ! (among others !) Bri Stone Cold Crazy?  It is a good fit for Adam's style.  If the song was being produced by an artist today, it might very well be in the EDM genre with digital accompaniment.

Bullet with Butterfly Wings wrote:

taptap wrote: @DrBrianMay Well, all I can say so far @AdamAddict is ... if you want to be ready, get your EARLY Queen albums out ! (among others !) Bri Stone Cold Crazy?  It is a good fit for Adam's style.  If the song was being produced by an artist today, it might very well be in the EDM genre with digital accompaniment.

No, I don't think it's a good fit for AL. The song is hard rock, and well AL isn't.

taptap wrote:

Bullet with Butterfly Wings wrote:

taptap wrote: @DrBrianMay Well, all I can say so far @AdamAddict is ... if you want to be ready, get your EARLY Queen albums out ! (among others !) Bri Stone Cold Crazy?  It is a good fit for Adam's style.  If the song was being produced by an artist today, it might very well be in the EDM genre with digital accompaniment.

No, I don't think it's a good fit for AL. The song is hard rock, and well AL isn't.

Queen disagrees with you.

Bullet with Butterfly Wings wrote:

taptap wrote:

Bullet with Butterfly Wings wrote:

taptap wrote: @DrBrianMay Well, all I can say so far @AdamAddict is ... if you want to be ready, get your EARLY Queen albums out ! (among others !) Bri Stone Cold Crazy?  It is a good fit for Adam's style.  If the song was being produced by an artist today, it might very well be in the EDM genre with digital accompaniment.

No, I don't think it's a good fit for AL. The song is hard rock, and well AL isn't.

Queen disagrees with you.

So? I disagree with Brian and Roger and anyone who feels AL can sing rock well, let alone the heavier songs like SCC which I don't think AL is a good fit for him. It seems very hard to do live(although a short song) So how did you manage to pick Freddie's and John's brains that they disagree with me :P

taptap wrote:

Bullet with Butterfly Wings wrote:

taptap wrote:

Bullet with Butterfly Wings wrote:

taptap wrote: @DrBrianMay Well, all I can say so far @AdamAddict is ... if you want to be ready, get your EARLY Queen albums out ! (among others !) Bri Stone Cold Crazy?  It is a good fit for Adam's style.  If the song was being produced by an artist today, it might very well be in the EDM genre with digital accompaniment.

No, I don't think it's a good fit for AL. The song is hard rock, and well AL isn't.

Queen disagrees with you.

So? I disagree with Brian and Roger and anyone who feels AL can sing rock well, let alone the heavier songs like SCC which I don't think AL is a good fit for him. It seems very hard to do live(although a short song) So how did you manage to pick Freddie's and John's brains that they disagree with me :P

I can read. And based on what I've read and what's happened, I think I can safely conclude that what Queen will do (and therefore how they think) is the exact opposite of what you'd like to see and what you think.  Here's a few examples: 1. You think Adam isn't a good fit stylistically or vocally for Queen, but Queen loves Adam and have chosen him for, progressively, a few one-offs, a mini-tour, and now a major tour.  They love his vocals and style, and say they're a perfect fit for what Freddie did.  I know that because they've said that - repeatedly. 2. You think Brian and Roger should tour alone (without a frontman, just singing themselves!), but Queen has never done it, and they never will, because - wait for it - they're not stupid.  They're a draw as part of the band Queen, and the band Queen needs a killer frontman to provide the main vocals, a role which neither Brian nor Roger is well suited for or enjoys.  This is why Brian and Kerry aren't the same draw as Queen with Brian, Roger, Spike, Neil and a guest vocalist (GM, PR, AL, etc.) 3. You think Adam is a karaoke singer, Queen thinks he's got a one in a million, killer voice. Ergo it's easy to draw the logical conclusion that you and Queen are on completely different pages where the future of Queen is concerned.  I expect, based on your hope that Queen does not make an album with AL, that indeed Queen WILL make an album with AL.  Keep up the predictions - their inverse makes me very happy.

Bullet with Butterfly Wings wrote:

taptap wrote:

Bullet with Butterfly Wings wrote:

taptap wrote:

Bullet with Butterfly Wings wrote:

taptap wrote: @DrBrianMay Well, all I can say so far @AdamAddict is ... if you want to be ready, get your EARLY Queen albums out ! (among others !) Bri Stone Cold Crazy?  It is a good fit for Adam's style.  If the song was being produced by an artist today, it might very well be in the EDM genre with digital accompaniment.

No, I don't think it's a good fit for AL. The song is hard rock, and well AL isn't.

Queen disagrees with you.

So? I disagree with Brian and Roger and anyone who feels AL can sing rock well, let alone the heavier songs like SCC which I don't think AL is a good fit for him. It seems very hard to do live(although a short song) So how did you manage to pick Freddie's and John's brains that they disagree with me :P

I can read. And based on what I've read and what's happened, I think I can safely conclude that what Queen will do (and therefore how they think) is the exact opposite of what you'd like to see and what you think.  Here's a few examples: 1. You think Adam isn't a good fit stylistically or vocally for Queen, but Queen loves Adam and have chosen him for, progressively, a few one-offs, a mini-tour, and now a major tour.  They love his vocals and style, and say they're a perfect fit for what Freddie did.  I know that because they've said that - repeatedly. 2. You think Brian and Roger should tour alone (without a frontman, just singing themselves!), but Queen has never done it, and they never will, because - wait for it - they're not stupid.  They're a draw as part of the band Queen, and the band Queen needs a killer frontman to provide the main vocals, a role which neither Brian nor Roger is well suited for or enjoys.  This is why Brian and Kerry aren't the same draw as Queen with Brian, Roger, Spike, Neil and a guest vocalist (GM, PR, AL, etc.) 3. You think Adam is a karaoke singer, Queen thinks he's got a one in a million, killer voice. Ergo it's easy to draw the logical conclusion that you and Queen are on completely different pages where the future of Queen is concerned.  I expect, based on your hope that Queen does not make an album with AL, that indeed Queen WILL make an album with AL.  Keep up the predictions - their inverse makes me very happy.

Nope, you can and you will twist things that I post, here and elsewhere, this is another example. I've said what I feel. I'm not talking for anyone else with my views he can't sing rock well. I have the right to disagree with Brian and Roger. You are stupid. You are relying on other people's words to suit you case about AL in this case repeating what Brian and Roger has said. Am I supposed to agree with them, you to be a fan in your eyes? Hell no, there are things I didn't like about Queen with Freddie. Again though, you are taking things from QOL to here. Just because you can't reply to me there.

taptap wrote:

Bullet with Butterfly Wings wrote:

taptap wrote:

Bullet with Butterfly Wings wrote:

taptap wrote:

Bullet with Butterfly Wings wrote:

taptap wrote: @DrBrianMay Well, all I can say so far @AdamAddict is ... if you want to be ready, get your EARLY Queen albums out ! (among others !) Bri Stone Cold Crazy?  It is a good fit for Adam's style.  If the song was being produced by an artist today, it might very well be in the EDM genre with digital accompaniment.

No, I don't think it's a good fit for AL. The song is hard rock, and well AL isn't.

Queen disagrees with you.

So? I disagree with Brian and Roger and anyone who feels AL can sing rock well, let alone the heavier songs like SCC which I don't think AL is a good fit for him. It seems very hard to do live(although a short song) So how did you manage to pick Freddie's and John's brains that they disagree with me :P

I can read. And based on what I've read and what's happened, I think I can safely conclude that what Queen will do (and therefore how they think) is the exact opposite of what you'd like to see and what you think.  Here's a few examples: 1. You think Adam isn't a good fit stylistically or vocally for Queen, but Queen loves Adam and have chosen him for, progressively, a few one-offs, a mini-tour, and now a major tour.  They love his vocals and style, and say they're a perfect fit for what Freddie did.  I know that because they've said that - repeatedly. 2. You think Brian and Roger should tour alone (without a frontman, just singing themselves!), but Queen has never done it, and they never will, because - wait for it - they're not stupid.  They're a draw as part of the band Queen, and the band Queen needs a killer frontman to provide the main vocals, a role which neither Brian nor Roger is well suited for or enjoys.  This is why Brian and Kerry aren't the same draw as Queen with Brian, Roger, Spike, Neil and a guest vocalist (GM, PR, AL, etc.) 3. You think Adam is a karaoke singer, Queen thinks he's got a one in a million, killer voice. Ergo it's easy to draw the logical conclusion that you and Queen are on completely different pages where the future of Queen is concerned.  I expect, based on your hope that Queen does not make an album with AL, that indeed Queen WILL make an album with AL.  Keep up the predictions - their inverse makes me very happy.

Nope, you can and you will twist things that I post, here and elsewhere, this is another example. I've said what I feel. I'm not talking for anyone else with my views he can't sing rock well. I have the right to disagree with Brian and Roger. You are stupid. You are relying on other people's words to suit you case about AL in this case repeating what Brian and Roger has said. Am I supposed to agree with them, you to be a fan in your eyes? Hell no, there are things I didn't like about Queen with Freddie. Again though, you are taking things from QOL to here. Just because you can't reply to me there.

Of course you have a right to disagree with Queen.  I didn't say you didn't.  I said Queen disagrees with you.  Does the fact that you want something different for Queen than Queen wants for themselves make you 'not a fan'?  I suppose not, but it does make you pretty irrelevant where Queen is concerned, as they won't be using your thoughts as a guideline for their future activities.  This is patently true based on their spoken words, written words, and actions.  Hence what you hope comes to pass with Queen is very unlikely to occur.  That's a big Yay! for me, since I, like Queen, also disagree with you as to how Queen should perform going forward.

SweetCaroline wrote: Icy probably wants to see this song performed on the tour: Bicycle Race link

SweetCaroline wrote: Love this interview with Brian, Roger and Adam: "First look of Queen and Adam Lambert" link Roger about Adam: "We drink his blood every day!" Love it!!!!!

**Mon 09 Jun 14** PRESS RELEASE: EXCLUSIVE QUEEN + ADAM LAMBERT iHEARTRADIO PERFORMANCE, BURBANK iHeartRadio show CLEAR CHANNEL PRESENTS EXCLUSIVE PERFORMANCE WITH QUEEN + ADAM LAMBERT AS PART OF THE IHEARTRADIO LIVE SERIES AT THE IHEARTRADIO THEATER LOS ANGELES WHAT: Clear Channel will host an exclusive performance featuring Queen + Adam Lambert as part of the iHeartRadio Live series, a Clear Channel entertainment production that features performances from today's top artists. The event will feature a live performance by Queen + Adam Lambert as well as an intimate Q&A, discussing their highly anticipated 24-date North American summer tour which will kickoff later that week. Queen + Adam Lambert received glowing reviews for their performance together at the iHeartRadio Music Festival in Las Vegas last September. The event will broadcast live on-air as a 60-minute special on Clear Channel Classic Rock stations and streamed online across Classic Rock, Classic Hits and Oldies station websites as well as iHeartRadio.com. WHEN: Monday, June 16, 2014 Show: 6:00 p.m. PST WHERE: iHeartRadio Theater Los Angeles 3000 W. Alameda Avenue, Burbank, CA 91523

inu-liger wrote: Tapers, cappers, mark your calendars accordingly ;) link

**Mon 09 Jun 14** PRESS RELEASE: EXCLUSIVE QUEEN + ADAM LAMBERT iHEARTRADIO PERFORMANCE, BURBANK iHeartRadio show CLEAR CHANNEL PRESENTS EXCLUSIVE PERFORMANCE WITH QUEEN + ADAM LAMBERT AS PART OF THE IHEARTRADIO LIVE SERIES AT THE IHEARTRADIO THEATER LOS ANGELES

taptap wrote: Persephone Lauer @PersephoneBott Wow..... Adam Lambert's voice sounds flawless... Crazy Amaze. #queen #AdamLambert #rehearsaltweet I believe she's one of the makeup/stylist people for QAL.

taptap wrote: Another tweet, this one from a guy who directs concert videos. Fingers crossed for a QAL one! Steve Price @babyjesusfilms Really impressed with @adamlambert at rehearsals today, that boy has some unbelievable lungs on him! #HugeTalent #Queen #Glamberts

SweetCaroline wrote:

taptap wrote: Another tweet, this one from a guy who directs concert videos. Fingers crossed for a QAL one! Steve Price @babyjesusfilms Really impressed with @adamlambert at rehearsals today, that boy has some unbelievable lungs on him! #HugeTalent #Queen #Glamberts

Yes, that sounds very encouraging and I hope HIS reaction to Adam's voice is going to be the consensus at these concerts! I hope he blows everyone away! Did you see the photos at this site: @UKGlambert: One to keep an eye on Queen & Adam Lambert 2014 Tour Pre-Tour Thread RockImitatesArt http://t.co/MxXtiejp3E taptap wrote: That is never going to happen.  Those who don't like the Q+ projects will be adamantly opposed to the + no matter what, but in order to appear objective will simply claim he doesn't work well with Queen in an attempt to get under the skin of the more sensitive fans.  Get used to it, it's going to happen.  On the other hand, who cares?  The arenas are sold out and the vast majority of attendees - most of whom would never seek out an online fan forum, are going to have a ball, and that's all that matters. This is why Brian and Roger keep asking Adam to perform with them, despite the fact that a few of their hardcore fans don't approve.  They've got marketing people and have figured out that the demand is due to a whole bunch of people that don't belong to the vocal minority yelling on social media.  It's a done deal now, and the numbers speak for themselves.  If you think you'll get all raves on a Queen site, or an idolbert site, it ain't gonna happen.  Just like idolberts, fans have their special snowflakes and feel that to support someone else is to downgrade that flake.  It doesn't make sense, but it happens all the time. Just enjoy the heck out of the great experience, and watch for the next opportunity, because I'm betting more will appear with all the positive press on this tour, and all the positive media critiques on their past joint performances.  And more importantly, it seems obvious that Brian and Roger intend to go out with a bang, and not a whimper, which bodes well for future projects.

SweetCaroline wrote: I'm not holding my breath that the hardcore Queen fans are ever going to accept Adam, but if the reviews of the early shows are really good, it would be very interesting if some of them decide to buy some last minute tickets from the ticket brokers. If they don't, so be it -- it won't take anything away from MY enjoyment of the show, that's for sure! taptap wrote: There are hardly any tickets left.  It really won't make a bit of difference in the big scheme of things if they do or don't.  Financially at least, the tour is already wildly successful.

cpc98 wrote: Hi guys, this is my first post here! I'm so excited about this tour. I've been waiting for Queen to return to the U.S. since I saw the Q + PR tour at the DCU Center in Worcester and the Wachovia Spectrum in Philadelphia. What a thrill to be able to see Brian and Roger live again! :D

cpc98 wrote: Hi guys, this is my first post here! I'm so excited about this tour. I've been waiting for Queen to return to the U.S. since I saw the Q + PR tour at the DCU Center in Worcester and the Wachovia Spectrum in Philadelphia. What a thrill to be able to see Brian and Roger live again! :D

taptap wrote: Arrgh! I have chronic bronchial issues that crop up twice a year or so and have been in the midst of one for a week. It's got one more week to be gone or I am gonna be pissed!

SweetCaroline wrote:

taptap wrote: Arrgh! I have chronic bronchial issues that crop up twice a year or so and have been in the midst of one for a week. It's got one more week to be gone or I am gonna be pissed!

NOOOOO! And I'm getting the sniffles!

CLEAR CHANNEL CLASSIC ROCK STATIONS: LISTED HERE - click on Classic Rck WATCH on Yahoo Screen Queen + Adam Lambert are getting ready to head out on an epic summer tour, but first they are making a stop at iHeartRadio's theater in Los Angeles on Monday, June 16 at 6pm PT/9pm ET. This will be Queen's first full-scale tour in six years, and the intimate show at the iHeartRadio Theater Los Angeles is sure to be one fans won't ever forget. The exclusive performance will not only feature many of the legendary rockers' biggest songs, but will be accompanied by a Q&A discussing their monumental tour, which kicks off later that week. The best part is fans across the country will be able to catch all the action. The event will be broadcast live on-air as a 60-minute audio special on Clear Channel Classic Rock stations: The video will be streamed online on Yahoo Screen. Queen + Adam Lambert rocked the crowd at the most recent iHeartRadio Music Festival in Las Vegas last September, which generated excellent reviews. In case you missed it, check out their performance below! iHEART RADIO

SweetCaroline wrote:

cpc98 wrote: Hi guys, this is my first post here! I'm so excited about this tour. I've been waiting for Queen to return to the U.S. since I saw the Q + PR tour at the DCU Center in Worcester and the Wachovia Spectrum in Philadelphia. What a thrill to be able to see Brian and Roger live again! :D

Hi there! Where will you be seeing them? In Philly?

SweetCaroline wrote: I'm not holding my breath that the hardcore Queen fans are ever going to accept Adam,

Queen + Adam Lambert iHeart Radio Theater Show - Live Stream Tomorrow's exclusive show in Burbank, Los Angeles will be available to watch live online in the US, Canada, Australia and New Zealand on the link below: Click here for full details.

The King Of Rhye wrote:

SweetCaroline wrote: I'm not holding my breath that the hardcore Queen fans are ever going to accept Adam,

At least one hardcore Queen fan does............:D

Mr.QueenFan wrote:Good to read that it was good, Inu. Why do they seat people on the arena ground in a rock concert? Is this an USA/Canadian thing? In Portugal and i think most of Europe we have standing seats, at least in rock concerts.

queenside wrote: what are the attendances for north american tour? were any shows sold out? how many people are they playing per night?

sinsome wrote:

queenside wrote: what are the attendances for north american tour? were any shows sold out? how many people are they playing per night?

Coulda sworn I saw someone posting Billboard numbers on another forum but whilst unsuccessfully trying to find them, ran across this ticket sales spreadsheet: link Don't know how accurate it is -- they have a space for official Billboard stats but it's not filled in yet -- but looks like they're putting a lot of work into it and updating regularly.

taptap wrote: It looks like QAL grossed ~$900,000 on the two Vegas concerts alone: http://www.reviewjournal.com/columns-blogs/entertainment/see-what-concerts-are-pulling-big-bucks It will be interesting to see the data on the other shows, where the venues are much bigger.  Of course the average prices at the Joint are higher, so there won't be a linear correlation, but there's no doubt this tour is gonna bring in some big bucks.  I wonder what the expenses are for the staging, those 19 trucks, and the traveling as well as local roadies?  No matter how you slice it, I think the primaries are going to come out of this very well.

Iron Butterfly wrote: @ Saint Jiub, if you ever get the time read this thread, here is one of them. If SweetCaroline still wants to say she has never done no wrong, here is just a piece of it.

Saint Jiub wrote:

Iron Butterfly wrote: @ Saint Jiub, if you ever get the time read this thread, here is one of them. If SweetCaroline still wants to say she has never done no wrong, here is just a piece of it.

Icy - Can you please point me toward specific pages. I really do not want to read all 15 pages ...

bucsateflon wrote: Naaaahh! I don't think you hate her, by the look of things and how your whole activity on this forum is to argue with her, I would say you are obsessed with her. You even succeeded dragging other certified crazies in your argument with their burnt piano and all... I even think you know each other personally, maybe you live next door to each other, the same house, anything is possible. Hell you might be split personality, a clone account of SweetCaroline... Who else would spend thousand of forum posts just to argue with her...

snifflese wrote: Somebody has way too much time on their hands and a really BIG Problem, make that 2 somebodies! I am always amazed that spamming gets you kicked off QOL, but a lot of really ugly things are just brushed over and I guess that happens when the MOD there also hates Adam. If spamming and being positive about a band is the worst thing you can do, then that is not especially egregious and not worthy of a rebuttal of 1000 pages at this point. Now if it was the runner.... He is the one that deserves all the crap he gets. You folks are amazing and not in a good way.

SweetCaroline wrote: snifflese, amen! Saw a really nice segment this morning on MSNBC about the Global Citizen event on September 28th. They showed a lot about Queen and Adam performing and the Bohemian Rhapsody biopic regarding Freddie’s battle with AIDS.

snifflese wrote: She is ignoring you! What else should she do at this point? What is there to promote in her 2 sentences? It is a FACT about an upcoming event. It is a huge event for charity, to earn money for the impoverished, a very wonderful thing that the band can be part of. You are always yapping about Live Aid and this would be a similar event. So where is the promotion? You need to change and learn.

snifflese wrote: Icy, she is not promoting the event. She is merely stating that there is such a thing about to happen in the future. Why in the world would you have a problem with it? She is REPORTING A FACT that some people here might like to know. This promoting and bigging up is beyond ridiculous at this point.