| inu-liger 28.03.2014 14:04 |
|
| Mr.QueenFan 28.03.2014 15:51 |
inu-liger wrote:I wouldn't put them in any group you've mentioned. Like everything in live, there are good ones and ones you don't want to talk to. For me it's all about music, so i really understand that when someone says that Adam can't sing or doesn't have a good voice they become defensive and attack back. The thing is - in my opinion - Adam is one exceptional singer anywhere in the world. And i think like this since the first time i saw him on American Idol. There were some performances there that brought a tear to my eye- and this was long before he was even considered to play with Queen in the finals. I try to keep an open mind about music and performers in general. I wouldn't say that they're just like any other Queenzoner, because as i see it today Queenzone is a very negative place where you can't discuss music anymore without trolling from someone, even members who think they're not trolls. You're not allowed do discuss and appreciate Queen anymore in Queenzone - and this is a so called Queen fan site?! There's a difference between an honest opinion and just plain negativity, and i can easily spot the difference. On the other hand, i'm very impressed with the support Adam fans give to him on his official forum, always supporting the man, and now they support both Brian and Roger as well. As i said before, i really believe that this new tour has more to do with the support given by Adam fans than Queen fans. These things don't go unnoticed with promoters who keep track of blogs and forums, and thank God for that, because if they took Queenzone or Queenonline seriously there wouldn't be a tour or anything else for that matter. Remember that this is the same site whose members claimed that Paul Rodgers can't sing either, and some believe that it was impossible for Paul to have been one of Freddie's favorites, despite the fact that Both Brian and Roger stated otherwise. So my feeling is that - with possible some exceptions - i believe that Adam fans are a very positive bunch and more fun to be around with at least on the internet, and i don't have the slightest problem admitting to this. |
| musicland munich 28.03.2014 16:07 |
Is there an option to click "Obnoxsious and Trolls" at once ? I'am not dissing the Tour itself, but there are some negative side-effects for good old QZ. |
| inu-liger 28.03.2014 16:16 |
musicland munich wrote:Is there an option to click "Obnoxsious and Trolls" at once ?Nah, IMO that would have been overkill. I'am not dissing the Tour itself, but there are some negative side-effects for good old QZ.This ^ |
| YAFF 28.03.2014 16:19 |
musicland munich wrote: Is there an option to click "Obnoxsious and Trolls" at once ? I'am not dissing the Tour itself, but there are some negative side-effects for good old QZ.I have dissed the tour but I'm really not that bothered by it all. There's been plenty of questionable Queen + endeavors and to be honest, Q+AL isn't even the worst in my estimation. I just find there's a lack of humility and respect from some Lambert zealots who stir up the shite on Queen sites. The nerve of them to come and speak only of Lambert and then play the gay card, the troll card, the martyr card and the whole deck eventually |
| Erin 28.03.2014 16:32 |
YAFF wrote: There's been plenty of questionable Queen + endeavors and to be honest, Q+AL isn't even the worst in my estimation.They will never do anything worse than Five...EVER. |
| Iron Butterfly 28.03.2014 16:41 |
YAFF wrote:One card short of a full deck comes to mind at some of their tactics.musicland munich wrote: Is there an option to click "Obnoxsious and Trolls" at once ? I'am not dissing the Tour itself, but there are some negative side-effects for good old QZ.I have dissed the tour but I'm really not that bothered by it all. There's been plenty of questionable Queen + endeavors and to be honest, Q+AL isn't even the worst in my estimation. I just find there's a lack of humility and respect from some Lambert zealots who stir up the shite on Queen sites. The nerve of them to come and speak only of Lambert and then play the gay card, the troll card, the martyr card and the whole deck eventually |
| matt z 28.03.2014 17:22 |
Erin wrote:Thankfully Roger wasn't involved with Dwarfy.... What's his name?YAFF wrote: There's been plenty of questionable Queen + endeavors and to be honest, Q+AL isn't even the worst in my estimation.They will never do anything worse than Five...EVER. Shabby? Shorty? Crappy? ... oh! It was Dappy! .... imho that was nearly a tie. Oh and there really should have been an obnoxious troll option and a "fantastic" option to weed out the recent trolling. Not all AL fans here care to troll. I understand their enthusiasm (which I've said is one of the few good things going for the fans) but out and out superlative ways can be overwhelmingly assaulting. I voted TROLL |
| Iron Butterfly 28.03.2014 18:18 |
Erin wrote:I liked Five and what was done with that. I think the Pepsi advert with WWRY, was/still remains awful IMO.YAFF wrote: There's been plenty of questionable Queen + endeavors and to be honest, Q+AL isn't even the worst in my estimation.They will never do anything worse than Five...EVER. |
| inu-liger 28.03.2014 18:21 |
Yeah, the Pepsi 2003 remake and the Jessie J versions of WWRY were definitely further down on the quality ladder |
| Erin 28.03.2014 18:38 |
Uhhgg..I had forgotten about Dappy. The Pepsi thing didn't bother me as much as Five, but yeah, it was bad. Pieter had bought me the Five singles, and I must have thrown them away cause they went missing. ;-P |
| YAFF 28.03.2014 22:24 |
you darn well know the glamberts are going to open countless accounts and vote. That's what these lemmings do with their time. |
| inu-liger 28.03.2014 22:25 |
Obnoxious (7 votes) 18.4% Trolls (10 votes) 26.3% Meh, just the same as any other Queenzoner (21 votes) 55.3% Yeah, I am kind of curious as to those numbers. |
| YAFF 28.03.2014 22:29 |
inu-liger wrote: Obnoxious (7 votes) 18.4% Trolls (10 votes) 26.3% Meh, just the same as any other Queenzoner (21 votes) 55.3% Yeah, I am kind of curious as to those numbers.guarantee that's what it is that's what they do on polls all over the net THEY HAVE NO SHAME |
| Saint Jiub 28.03.2014 22:38 |
I voted "same as us" even though "troll", "obnoxious" and "same as us" are equivalent. |
| inu-liger 28.03.2014 22:40 |
Comes down to individual perspective, Panchgani |
| inu-liger 28.03.2014 22:49 |
42 votes in one day. That's a bit suspicious too, I don't recall ANY of my past polls getting that many votes in one day alone, never mind the FIRST day alone! |
| YAFF 28.03.2014 23:01 |
inu-liger wrote: 42 votes in one day. That's a bit suspicious too, I don't recall ANY of my past polls getting that many votes in one day alone, never mind the FIRST day alone!there's no mystery. the glamberts are opening new accounts and voting. the admin could easily check how many new accounts were open the past few hours and that will prove it |
| YAFF 28.03.2014 23:32 |
YAFF wrote:also all one has to do is vote then sign out and sign in again and vote over and overinu-liger wrote: 42 votes in one day. That's a bit suspicious too, I don't recall ANY of my past polls getting that many votes in one day alone, never mind the FIRST day alone!there's no mystery. the glamberts are opening new accounts and voting. the admin could easily check how many new accounts were open the past few hours and that will prove it |
| inu-liger 28.03.2014 23:35 |
YAFF wrote:also all one has to do is vote then sign out and sign in again and vote over and overWell that's fucked. Been on this site more than long enough and I've never known that. I always assumed it was username/IP locked. |
| inu-liger 28.03.2014 23:35 |
"68 total votes," yeah this poll's definitely been rigged. |
| YAFF 28.03.2014 23:37 |
inu-liger wrote:Yeah. Shame it's that way but this site doesn't even send out email confirmations to join the site. You can join as many times as you like under different names and phony emails unless your IP got blockedYAFF wrote:also all one has to do is vote then sign out and sign in again and vote over and overWell that's fucked. Been on this site more than long enough and I've never known that. I always assumed it was username/IP locked. |
| inu-liger 28.03.2014 23:41 |
It's a wonder this website hasn't been hacked, given the weak coding and potential for vulnerable exploitation. |
| Iron Butterfly 28.03.2014 23:46 |
inu-liger wrote: It's a wonder this website hasn't been hacked, given the weak coding and potential for vulnerable exploitation.What happened a few months ago? I know you are aware I used to read here, but just a few months ago, the forums wouldn't even come up for a day or 2. |
| inu-liger 28.03.2014 23:55 |
No clue |
| musicland munich 29.03.2014 00:39 |
Black Velvet wrote:Maybe you're meaning that "Warning" banner from Google ?inu-liger wrote: It's a wonder this website hasn't been hacked, given the weak coding and potential for vulnerable exploitation.What happened a few months ago? I know you are aware I used to read here, but just a few months ago, the forums wouldn't even come up for a day or 2. A couple of weeks ago. |
| Iron Butterfly 29.03.2014 02:08 |
musicland munich wrote:^ This.Black Velvet wrote:Maybe you're meaning that "Warning" banner from Google ? A couple of weeks ago.inu-liger wrote: It's a wonder this website hasn't been hacked, given the weak coding and potential for vulnerable exploitation.What happened a few months ago? I know you are aware I used to read here, but just a few months ago, the forums wouldn't even come up for a day or 2. |
| musicland munich 29.03.2014 03:01 |
Black Velvet wrote:As far as I can remember it was for spam/maleware.musicland munich wrote:^ This.Black Velvet wrote:Maybe you're meaning that "Warning" banner from Google ? A couple of weeks ago.inu-liger wrote: It's a wonder this website hasn't been hacked, given the weak coding and potential for vulnerable exploitation.What happened a few months ago? I know you are aware I used to read here, but just a few months ago, the forums wouldn't even come up for a day or 2. Anyway, by that much numbers of votes for "just the same as us" I think it's pretty clear something is wrong here. |
| inu-liger 29.03.2014 03:31 |
"Anyway, by that much numbers of votes for "just the same as us" I think it's pretty clear something is wrong here." Yeah no kidding eh. And they have the balls to deny they have an agenda or a cause. I think this is evidence pointing to the contrary otherwise. |
| rocknrolllover 29.03.2014 05:52 |
I won't vote because I am not a troll, I am not obnoxious. Voting itself is a stupid, you know. With the same success you can hold a vote on the topic "how do you feel about gays in show business?" or "Changed your attitude towards favorite singer after that when you learned he's gay?" |
| brENsKi 29.03.2014 06:29 |
rocknrolllover wrote: I won't vote because I am not a troll, I am not obnoxious. Voting itself is a stupid, you know. That AND the fact you'd be the proverbial "Turkey voting for Christmas" |
| soxtalon 29.03.2014 06:29 |
Honestly, I've been interacting with Glamberts since Adam first started singing with the band. Generally they are what most artist worshippers are like towards the beginning of their careers. Full of hope optimism and love. There is a large percentage though that are beyond fanatical and it really is detrimental to how the rest of the fanbase looks but for the most part they are just a very positive fanbase. Both sides have a percentage of vocal fans that amp up the other side. |
| SweetCaroline 29.03.2014 08:14 |
I'm not voting in this poll because I agree 100% with the post by "Mr.QueenFan." |
| rocknrolllover 29.03.2014 08:41 |
brENsKi wrote:As usual you are talking nonsense, although inu liger any nonsense applauds standingrocknrolllover wrote: I won't vote because I am not a troll, I am not obnoxious. Voting itself is a stupid, you know.That AND the fact you'd be the proverbial "Turkey voting for Christmas" |
| Djdownsy 29.03.2014 09:56 |
rocknrolllover wrote:The Irony in that last sentence is delicious!brENsKi wrote: That AND the fact you'd be the proverbial "Turkey voting for Christmas"As usual you are talking nonsense, although inu liger any nonsense applauds standing |
| gerry 29.03.2014 13:39 |
Well Lambert fans are obnoxious. Most of them have not even heard of Queen or there legacy, and i find that the tour is all about Lambert and Brian & Roger are just back ground extras! Still while i do not agree what is happening, just let them get all this shit out of there systems and hopefully Queen will be Lambert free soon! Looking forward to a real Queen album in the autumn with Freddie. Does anyone know if John Deacon is contributing to the new Queen tracks? |
| Iron Butterfly 29.03.2014 13:45 |
soxtalon wrote: Honestly, I've been interacting with Glamberts since Adam first started singing with the band. Generally they are what most artist worshippers are like towards the beginning of their careers. Full of hope optimism and love. There is a large percentage though that are beyond fanatical and it really is detrimental to how the rest of the fanbase looks but for the most part they are just a very positive fanbase. Both sides have a percentage of vocal fans that amp up the other side.I too have been interacting as you put it. I can honestly say I've never come across a fan base like it. From what I've seen it's not a good thing IMO. I was told I would be accepted by the Glamberts and even AL, but less than a month later that changed. I'm proud that some of AL's fans don't consider me a fan. I know I'm a fan of his solo music, I just don't think he is the right fit or voice for Queen. |
| SweetCaroline 29.03.2014 14:00 |
gerry wrote: Well Lambert fans are obnoxious. Most of them have not even heard of Queen or there legacy, and i find that the tour is all about Lambert and Brian & Roger are just back ground extras! Still while i do not agree what is happening, just let them get all this shit out of there systems and hopefully Queen will be Lambert free soon! Looking forward to a real Queen album in the autumn with Freddie. Does anyone know if John Deacon is contributing to the new Queen tracks?This is blatantly false. We are in awe of Queen, Freddie, John, Brian and Roger and, like Adam, believe it is an honor for him to be invited to tour with THEM and NOT the other way around! icy, you ruined it for yourself when you started to chime in and agree with everything the Milkman troll was posting! He already had a long history with us of posting nasty crap about Adam but you were too blind to see that! |
| Iron Butterfly 29.03.2014 14:12 |
SweetCaroline wrote:I agreed on some things he said, not everything. So I was right all along(you are so messing up here too, awesome to see!) that my replying to him, changed your views about me. Ruined it for myself and chiming in and agreeing with everything he said, two of that is very wrong. But if by talking to someone else is enough for you to think and post I ruined it for myself, you are petty, hopeless, biased and greedy.gerry wrote: Well Lambert fans are obnoxious. Most of them have not even heard of Queen or there legacy, and i find that the tour is all about Lambert and Brian & Roger are just back ground extras! Still while i do not agree what is happening, just let them get all this shit out of there systems and hopefully Queen will be Lambert free soon! Looking forward to a real Queen album in the autumn with Freddie. Does anyone know if John Deacon is contributing to the new Queen tracks?This is blatantly false. We are in awe of Queen, Freddie, John, Brian and Roger and, like Adam, believe it is an honor for him to be invited to tour with THEM and NOT the other way around! icy, you ruined it for yourself when you started to chime in and agree with everything the Milkman troll was posting! He already had a long history with us of posting nasty crap about Adam but you were too blind to see that! I had no idea who or what he did elsewhere, that had nothing to do with me, as I didn't even know him then. I like chatting with him on QOL. He knows and listens to more music than AL. Why even bring him up over here, CNB? |
| SweetCaroline 29.03.2014 14:24 |
You asked why you weren't being accepted by the AL fans. I just gave you an answer, but, as usual, you cannot accept it! For almost 3 years you have mocked Adam and his fans just to stay on good terms with MM and the others who spoke against him. If you are a fan, you wouldn't have done that quite so willingly and strongly. You are welcome to your opinion, of course, as to whether Adam suits the Queen music, but you expend as much energy speaking against it as we do speaking for it, so I don't think you should be the one throwing stones at the people who are trying to be positive instead of so annoyingly negative as you are! End of conversation, again, on my side, but you are free to go on for another 16 pages like you usually do! |
| Iron Butterfly 29.03.2014 14:34 |
SweetCaroline wrote: You asked why you weren't being accepted by the AL fans. I just gave you an answer, but, as usual, you cannot accept it! For almost 3 years you have mocked Adam and his fans just to stay on good terms with MM and the others who spoke against him. If you are a fan, you wouldn't have done that quite so willingly and strongly. You are welcome to your opinion, of course, as to whether Adam suits the Queen music, but you expend as much energy speaking against it as we do speaking for it, so I don't think you should be the one throwing stones at the people who are trying to be positive instead of so annoyingly negative as you are! End of conversation, again, on my side, but you are free to go on for another 16 pages like you usually do!You are so small minded and close minded. You slipped up here, amazing what you can post when you are butthurt. All because I agreed sometimes and chatted with another poster, is the reason why you and the other Glamberts didn't and I guess still do not accept me. What a sad, sorry, biased way to feel, let alone post. I hope others can see that for themselves. You threw stones time and time again, this one is just the latest. If you cant handle people having other views than you do, get the off the internet or get a life. I don't need/want to be accepted by the likes of you. I never have or never will. |
| inu-liger 29.03.2014 15:50 |
So there you have it ladies and gents, as far as so-called "fans" of AL like cheese&whine and craptrap are concerned, you're either with them ('a fan') or against them ('not a real fan') |
| taptap 29.03.2014 16:11 |
inu-liger wrote: So there you have it ladies and gents, as far as so-called "fans" of AL like cheese&whine and craptrap are concerned, you're either with them ('a fan') or against them ('not a real fan')Somebody's cranky today... |
| inu-liger 29.03.2014 16:14 |
Got any original responses, or are you just gonna trot out the Rob Ford-ish style shit to continually distract from the intended subject? |
| inu-liger 29.03.2014 16:15 |
And you know, now might be a good time to confess to multiple account creations, if 'trollert' is indeed your other alias ;-) |
| Iron Butterfly 29.03.2014 16:17 |
inu-liger wrote: So there you have it ladies and gents, as far as so-called "fans" of AL like cheese&whine and craptrap are concerned, you're either with them ('a fan') or against them ('not a real fan')I see it all now, from why I was never a fan in their eyes, a hater and so much more, this has explained so much, and it's all here in black and white now. All because I agreed at times and talked with another person. I had an inkling that was the case for ages, but as you state there you have it. |
| Iron Butterfly 29.03.2014 16:20 |
taptap wrote:CNB sure is, butthurt biased to boot. Or can't you tell?inu-liger wrote: So there you have it ladies and gents, as far as so-called "fans" of AL like cheese&whine and craptrap are concerned, you're either with them ('a fan') or against them ('not a real fan')Somebody's cranky today... |
| taptap 29.03.2014 16:25 |
inu-liger wrote: Got any original responses, or are you just gonna trot out the Rob Ford-ish style shit to continually distract from the intended subject?Well, let's see. The original topic is your very well designed poll. You captured all the key attributes and I'm sure Nate Silver would be proud. It is a shame that the granny ninja glamberts hacked it so that they could win the prize of 'just like you' (a dubious prize imo, but different strokes for different folks). The good news is I guess you can teach an old dog new tricks. I know, I know, it's not very original, but then again neither was your poll. |
| inu-liger 29.03.2014 16:50 |
"I know, I know, it's not very original, but then again neither was your poll." Neither were your lot's dirty tricks hijacking the results. |
| taptap 29.03.2014 16:55 |
inu-liger wrote: "I know, I know, it's not very original, but then again neither was your poll." Neither were your lot's dirty tricks hijacking the results.If you really think glamberts hacked your poll, you should probably ask a mod to check out the IP addresses. |
| musicland munich 29.03.2014 16:56 |
QZ should become a better place these days. The "Glambert" fanatics aren't the only "problem"...weird people(requiring mental treatments),trolls(slap in the face/IP-Ban), advertisings for sports gear in a discussion board( IP-Ban) ! This site is in need of some more serious moderation. |
| inu-liger 29.03.2014 17:03 |
taptap wrote:Careful, I just actually might!inu-liger wrote: "I know, I know, it's not very original, but then again neither was your poll." Neither were your lot's dirty tricks hijacking the results.If you really think glamberts hacked your poll, you should probably ask a mod to check out the IP addresses. |
| taptap 29.03.2014 17:05 |
inu-liger wrote:Believe me, I definitely think you should.taptap wrote:Careful, I just actually might!inu-liger wrote: "I know, I know, it's not very original, but then again neither was your poll." Neither were your lot's dirty tricks hijacking the results.If you really think glamberts hacked your poll, you should probably ask a mod to check out the IP addresses. |
| inu-liger 29.03.2014 17:07 |
And I equally think you should confess to any multiple accounts you may have set up, now, before any IP checks reveal any. |
| taptap 29.03.2014 17:10 |
inu-liger wrote: And I equally think you should confess to any multiple accounts you may have set up, now, before any IP checks reveal any.I only have one account on QZ. I have no problem with the mods confirming that. |
| musicland munich 29.03.2014 17:14 |
SweetCaroline - Page not found !? Black Velvet - Page not found !? taptap - Page not found!? inu-liger - inu-liger !!! ( legit profile) YAFF - YAFF !!! ( legit profile) |
| taptap 29.03.2014 17:19 |
musicland munich wrote: SweetCaroline - Page not found !? Black Velvet - Page not found !? taptap - Page not found!? inu-liger - inu-liger !!! ( legit profile)Filling out a profile page is not the same as an account. We all have accounts or we couldn't post here. Lots of people never create profiles on forums. I say let the mods check IP addresses to see where the votes came from if there's a concern. |
| musicland munich 29.03.2014 17:27 |
There is "nothing" filled out in YAFF's profile and I'can open it ??? |
| taptap 29.03.2014 17:31 |
musicland munich wrote: There is "nothing" filled out in YAFF's profile and I'can open it ???If you don't fill out a profile page when you open an account, you don't have a profile. But you still have an acct. that is tied to your IP address. The mods should be able to see this part, but not us. Profiles (interest pages) are generally open to everyone. Some use them, some don't. |
| musicland munich 29.03.2014 17:43 |
taptap wrote:Even if this is the case - a funny coincidence- don't you think ?musicland munich wrote: There is "nothing" filled out in YAFF's profile and I'can open it ???If you don't fill out a profile page when you open an account, you don't have a profile. But you still have an acct. that is tied to your IP address. The mods should be able to see this part, but not us. Profiles (interest pages) are generally open to everyone. Some use them, some don't. |
| taptap 29.03.2014 17:46 |
musicland munich wrote:A funny coincidence that some have profiles and some don't? There's no coincidence, because the profile pages have nothing to do with polls.taptap wrote:Even if this is the case - a funny coincidence- don't you think ?musicland munich wrote: There is "nothing" filled out in YAFF's profile and I'can open it ???If you don't fill out a profile page when you open an account, you don't have a profile. But you still have an acct. that is tied to your IP address. The mods should be able to see this part, but not us. Profiles (interest pages) are generally open to everyone. Some use them, some don't. Profile pages are just filled in by members who want to share their interests with other members, that's why some of the questions on this particular profile form are Queen-centric - because it's a Queen forum. I bet more members than not never filled out a profile page (that's generally true in all forums). If you seriously want to know if a member voted more than once in inu's poll, the only way to tell is if a mod checks the IP addresses to see if there are duplicate votes from the same computer. Even old grannies know that. P.S. Musicland Munich - Sorry! Page Not Found |
| musicland munich 29.03.2014 17:58 |
Ok, is there an option to change that somehow ? |
| inu-liger 29.03.2014 17:59 |
Fill out a profile http://www.queenzone.com/members/profile.aspx |
| taptap 29.03.2014 18:00 |
musicland munich wrote: Ok, is there an option to change that somehow ?Hang on, I'll try to find where the 'add profile' option is. It should be under your member/acct section. Be right back. Found it. If you highlight members at the top of the page, a drop-box list shows up and includes Profile. |
| inu-liger 29.03.2014 18:01 |
taptap wrote:Don't bother, I already beat you to it ^musicland munich wrote: Ok, is there an option to change that somehow ?Hang on, I'll try to find where the 'add profile' option is. It should be under your member/acct section. Be right back. |
| Iron Butterfly 29.03.2014 18:16 |
musicland munich wrote: SweetCaroline - Page not found !? Black Velvet - Page not found !? taptap - Page not found!? inu-liger - inu-liger !!! ( legit profile) YAFF - YAFF !!! ( legit profile)I didn't and won't be filing mine out because i know some are likely to use anything and everything they can find out about me. I already had threats by mithril aka taptap about forwarding my posts from QOL on to a legal commission. Inu can vouch I'm good. |
| inu-liger 29.03.2014 18:28 |
Indeed, I can. And I've just shot off a request to Barb to investigate whoever's behind the abuses going on here, including multiple user ID fraud, and to also look into the poll voting coding loophole |
| taptap 29.03.2014 18:30 |
inu-liger wrote: Indeed, I can. And I've just shot off a request to Barb to investigate whoever's behind the abuses going on here, including multiple user ID fraud, and to also look into the poll voting coding loopholeI can't wait to hear the results! |
| Iron Butterfly 29.03.2014 18:34 |
taptap wrote:@ taptap I bet LOL.inu-liger wrote: Indeed, I can. And I've just shot off a request to Barb to investigate whoever's behind the abuses going on here, including multiple user ID fraud, and to also look into the poll voting coding loopholeI can't wait to hear the results! Thanks inu. |
| musicland munich 29.03.2014 18:37 |
Oh, we have a problem here... First I add some Infos to the profile but I'am getting the page not found info. Second : I signed out to check if that maybe changed. No so far. But here is the biggest bug !!! I signed out and was requested to vote ( wich was the second time) again and it worked !!! |
| taptap 29.03.2014 18:40 |
musicland munich wrote: Oh, we have a problem here... First I add some Infos to the profile but I'am getting the page not found info. Second : I signed out to check if that maybe changed. No so far. But here is the biggest bug !!! I signed out and was requested to vote ( wich was the second time) again and it worked !!!That's why I said the mods have to match votes against IP addresses. Hopefully the s/w is written so that they can see every vote and see if any duplicates came from the same computer. The IP addresses will match up to accounts, so if anyone has voted more than once, or has more than one account, the mods would see it. |
| musicland munich 29.03.2014 18:53 |
^Ok now I' see...Thank you. |
| taptap 29.03.2014 19:00 |
musicland munich wrote: ^Ok now I' see...Thank you.No problem. |
| Iron Butterfly 29.03.2014 19:24 |
I know on QOL, the members can only vote on polls. I thought the same went for here. |
| SweetCaroline 29.03.2014 19:29 |
It's probably The Milkman -- he's some kind of computer whiz -- at least he's on his computer 24/7! I wouldn't be surprised if he is a hacker as well! |
| Iron Butterfly 29.03.2014 19:32 |
SweetCaroline wrote: It's probably The Milkman -- he's some kind of computer whiz -- at least he's on his computer 24/7!Do you see him here? I don't. How can you even guess what he does with his time? All you are doing is proving exactly how petty, small minded and obnoxious you can be. |
| matt z 29.03.2014 21:04 |
Hmm. I remember inflating votes on my old "which John Deacon style do you prefer" poll. ... 70's hair. Gaga video, grey hair etc. FTR I voted twice for trolls. Seems that all past history vanishes upon a new day and the results are no longer visible. ALSO non users can vote as well. So it's hardly accurate. Just always accepted that that was the way it is. (Shrug) I don't feel like signing up on a poll website every time someone wants an OFFICIAL count. Someone needs to rewrite the script on these polls |
| inu-liger 29.03.2014 22:40 |
Well at least the results shifted the other way around... |
| YAFF 29.03.2014 23:06 |
taptap wrote:Of course you'd say that because all you have to do is log off and log back on and vote again and again. YOU DON'T NEED SEPARATE PROFILES. Vote. Log out. Log back in, Vote again. That's what you and sweatycaroline did. I just did it just now to prove you can.inu-liger wrote:Believe me, I definitely think you should.taptap wrote:Careful, I just actually might!inu-liger wrote: "I know, I know, it's not very original, but then again neither was your poll." Neither were your lot's dirty tricks hijacking the results.If you really think glamberts hacked your poll, you should probably ask a mod to check out the IP addresses. |
| YAFF 29.03.2014 23:07 |
inu-liger wrote: Well at least the results shifted the other way around...Like I said in another post all one has to do is log off and log back in and vote again. Rinse. Repeat. I was wrong that they needed to create whole new profiles |
| inu-liger 29.03.2014 23:10 |
Well, if Barb ever follows through with my request, we could potentially find out whether or not our concerns about duplicate profiles were justified or not. |
| YAFF 29.03.2014 23:10 |
taptap wrote: The IP addresses will match up to accounts, so if anyone has voted more than once, or has more than one account, the mods would see it.Not true. You can vote with your same IP repeatedly by signng out and signing back in Same IP. I created a few fake accounts just to see if it could be done and it can but then I notice you don't have to |
| Iron Butterfly 29.03.2014 23:24 |
Omg! Will I be banned if I voted more than once? I mean like people get banned from QOL for spamming, and such :O LOL |
| musicland munich 30.03.2014 00:22 |
The technical problems of this website are ridiculous. Trolls can "overrun" this place whenever they want. Sad ! |
| rocknrolllover 30.03.2014 01:20 |
This good place for me. IP banned stuff don't stop me. Because I am sleep with Barbara. |
| Saint Jiub 30.03.2014 14:08 |
rocknrolllover wrote: This good place for me. IP banned stuff don't stop me. Because I am sleep with Barbara.No - that is not possible. You're gay. ... and an Adam Lambert lover like you would never "am sleep with Barbara" |
| AdamMethos 31.03.2014 00:56 |
soxtalon wrote: Honestly, I've been interacting with Glamberts since Adam first started singing with the band. Generally they are what most artist worshippers are like towards the beginning of their careers. Full of hope optimism and love. There is a large percentage though that are beyond fanatical and it really is detrimental to how the rest of the fanbase looks but for the most part they are just a very positive fanbase. Both sides have a percentage of vocal fans that amp up the other side.I don't have a problem with super-enthusiastic fans. I've been an obsessive fan of some TV shows to the point of wearing costumes, attending conventions (organizing conventions!) and once even participating in a rally/march on a network studio when a show was threatened with cancellation. So I've had intimate experience with super-enthusiasm! haha The issues I have with Glamberts (at least the ones who post on Queen boards) that I haven't encountered in my other fandoms are: 1. The sensible/moderate Glamberts generally don't call out the fanatics on their idiocy. I guess they feel they have to stick together and support each other NO MATTER WHAT when among "outsiders" but the problem is by being silent (or worse, sticking up for the fanatics) they get lumped in with them. 2. There's this "Green Eggs and Ham" vibe from a lot of Glamberts when in the company of those who are not as enthusiastic about AL as they are. As in: Average punter: I don't like green eggs and Adam. Glambert: But maybe you'd like him in Kiev? Hammersmith? iHeart? In this picture? In this video? In this tweet? In a boat? On a moat? With a goat? Etc. :D Speaking of Green Eggs and Ham, I love this brilliant musical rendition of the Dr. Seuss book by the band Moxy Fruvous: link |
| Iron Butterfly 31.03.2014 01:16 |
AdamMethos wrote:What about goat pictures with AL's face imposed on it and when AL sounds like a goat? Glamberts sure do not like that LOL.soxtalon wrote: Honestly, I've been interacting with Glamberts since Adam first started singing with the band. Generally they are what most artist worshippers are like towards the beginning of their careers. Full of hope optimism and love. There is a large percentage though that are beyond fanatical and it really is detrimental to how the rest of the fanbase looks but for the most part they are just a very positive fanbase. Both sides have a percentage of vocal fans that amp up the other side.I don't have a problem with super-enthusiastic fans. I've been an obsessive fan of some TV shows to the point of wearing costumes, attending conventions (organizing conventions!) and once even participating in a rally/march on a network studio when a show was threatened with cancellation. So I've had intimate experience with super-enthusiasm! haha The issues I have with Glamberts (at least the ones who post on Queen boards) that I haven't encountered in my other fandoms are: 1. The sensible/moderate Glamberts generally don't call out the fanatics on their idiocy. I guess they feel they have to stick together and support each other NO MATTER WHAT when among "outsiders" but the problem is by being silent (or worse, sticking up for the fanatics) they get lumped in with them. 2. There's this "Green Eggs and Ham" vibe from a lot of Glamberts when in the company of those who are not as enthusiastic about AL as they are. As in: Average punter: I don't like green eggs and Adam. Glambert: But maybe you'd like him in Kiev? Hammersmith? iHeart? In this picture? In this video? In this tweet? In a boat? On a moat? With a goat? Etc. :D Speaking of Green Eggs and Ham, I love this brilliant musical rendition of the Dr. Seuss book by the band Moxy Fruvous: link |
| rocknrolllover 31.03.2014 02:39 |
Panchgani wrote:I am not gay. What about you, you can carry on hide your own latent homosexuality.rocknrolllover wrote: This good place for me. IP banned stuff don't stop me. Because I am sleep with Barbara.No - that is not possible. You're gay. ... and an Adam Lambert lover like you would never "am sleep with Barbara" I deeply to spit on your insults |
| Holly2003 31.03.2014 05:43 |
rocknrolllover wrote:Is he a son of a biscuit and do your ancestors spit on his haircut?Panchgani wrote:I am not gay. What about you, you can carry on hide your own latent homosexuality. I deeply to spit on your insultsrocknrolllover wrote: This good place for me. IP banned stuff don't stop me. Because I am sleep with Barbara.No - that is not possible. You're gay. ... and an Adam Lambert lover like you would never "am sleep with Barbara" |
| rocknrolllover 31.03.2014 06:24 |
Holly2003 wrote:Everything you said is bullshit !!rocknrolllover wrote:Is he a son of a biscuit and do your ancestors spit on his haircut?Panchgani wrote:I am not gay. What about you, you can carry on hide your own latent homosexuality. I deeply to spit on your insultsrocknrolllover wrote: This good place for me. IP banned stuff don't stop me. Because I am sleep with Barbara.No - that is not possible. You're gay. ... and an Adam Lambert lover like you would never "am sleep with Barbara" |
| inu-liger 31.03.2014 06:42 |
Go take a guitar, stick yourself in a tub of water along with an amp, plug the guitar into said amp and turn it on. I hear you can get some real sizzling tones that way. |
| Erin 31.03.2014 09:46 |
I'm not trying to be an ass here, but could somebody please explain why AL's fan base appears to consist largely of older women? That's fine, if it is, but I am confused by it. |
| thomasquinn 32989 31.03.2014 09:54 |
Erin wrote: I'm not trying to be an ass here, but could somebody please explain why AL's fan base appears to consist largely of older women? That's fine, if it is, but I am confused by it.It's about S-E-X. Don't tell anyone I told you so, ok? |
| Iron Butterfly 31.03.2014 09:58 |
thomasquinn 32989 wrote:On the other hand, there are the ones who think of him as their son.Erin wrote: I'm not trying to be an ass here, but could somebody please explain why AL's fan base appears to consist largely of older women? That's fine, if it is, but I am confused by it.It's about S-E-X. Don't tell anyone I told you so, ok? Yikes! Not sure what is worse, the sex or the son cravings some have for him :P |
| thomasquinn 32989 31.03.2014 10:02 |
Black Velvet wrote:If you want to get really freaked out, consider that there are likely a lot of them for who the two categories overlap...thomasquinn 32989 wrote:On the other hand, there are the ones who think of him as their son. Yikes! Not sure what is worse, the sex or the son cravings some have for him :PErin wrote: I'm not trying to be an ass here, but could somebody please explain why AL's fan base appears to consist largely of older women? That's fine, if it is, but I am confused by it.It's about S-E-X. Don't tell anyone I told you so, ok? |
| Erin 31.03.2014 10:49 |
thomasquinn 32989 wrote:linkBlack Velvet wrote:If you want to get really freaked out, consider that there are likely a lot of them for who the two categories overlap...thomasquinn 32989 wrote:On the other hand, there are the ones who think of him as their son. Yikes! Not sure what is worse, the sex or the son cravings some have for him :PErin wrote: I'm not trying to be an ass here, but could somebody please explain why AL's fan base appears to consist largely of older women? That's fine, if it is, but I am confused by it.It's about S-E-X. Don't tell anyone I told you so, ok? |
| inu-liger 31.03.2014 11:13 |
lol ^^ |
| Iron Butterfly 31.03.2014 17:30 |
Erin wrote:That and more LOL.thomasquinn 32989 wrote:linkBlack Velvet wrote:If you want to get really freaked out, consider that there are likely a lot of them for who the two categories overlap...thomasquinn 32989 wrote:On the other hand, there are the ones who think of him as their son. Yikes! Not sure what is worse, the sex or the son cravings some have for him :PErin wrote: I'm not trying to be an ass here, but could somebody please explain why AL's fan base appears to consist largely of older women? That's fine, if it is, but I am confused by it.It's about S-E-X. Don't tell anyone I told you so, ok? |
