| lifetimefanofqueen 24.06.2010 10:27 |
here's a good Question, when did you prefer Freddie? his glam look in the 70's or his signature moustache look in the 80's? For me, hmmm, I love both! but I probably like 70's Freddie. yay. XD you? |
| Marina K. 24.06.2010 10:43 |
special charm in his youth, special charm in his mature age - impossible to choose.. |
| Princess140686 24.06.2010 10:49 |
When you Love somebody no matter his appearance ! Freddie 70' or Freddie 80'...it's FREDDIE !!!!!! ..and I love him since 26 years..... |
| Kacoblin 24.06.2010 14:49 |
I will still love Freddie no matter how much hair he's got on his head or above his lip. |
| andreas_mercury 24.06.2010 21:19 |
freddie of 1991 you see the dignity |
| Saint Jiub 24.06.2010 21:41 |
70's - Freddie's songwriting ability was never the same after The Game. |
| Gregsynth 24.06.2010 22:17 |
I prefer 1980s Freddie. He had the mustache, and that mustache gave him the powers of replicating his songs live! lol |
| plumrach 25.06.2010 02:54 |
I like him more in the 80's than the 70's but he was just a magnificent all round person and sorely missed |
| lifetimefanofqueen 25.06.2010 04:46 |
yes, Freddie is sorely missed indeed :=( WE MISS YOU SOOOO MUCH FREDDIE!!!!!!!!!! WHY YOU, TELL ME WHY YOU, COULDNT IT HAVE BEEN SOMEONE EVIL!!!!!!!! :=( |
| LordOfAllDarkness 25.06.2010 12:05 |
70s Freddie indeed |
| GratefulFan 25.06.2010 12:18 |
Marina K. wrote: special charm in his youth, special charm in his mature age - impossible to choose.. ================================= Wonderfully put Marina. :) |
| freddiefan91 29.06.2010 02:42 |
80's freddie Although if you think about it Freddie radically changed his look and the 80's freddie did not really resemble the 70's Freddie, he appeared more grown up and more reserved I think, at least during interviews anyway, on stage he was still the master |
| Over the Field 29.06.2010 14:57 |
70's Freddie especially the Queen I - Day at the Races period (long hair, glam stuff) |
| skip 01.07.2010 02:45 |
'70s Much better music. |
| andreas_mercury 01.07.2010 04:06 |
very true although even the worst queen is better than the best kiss ...... end of discussion. |
| mike hunt 01.07.2010 11:58 |
Songwriting, vocal arrangements obviously 70's. live performance, vocal power 80's Appearance, 1973-76, Then 80-86 |
| Major Tom 01.07.2010 12:13 |
BOTH darling! |
| skip 02.07.2010 01:57 |
andreas_mercury wrote: very true although even the worst queen is better than the best kiss ...... end of discussion. ----- You have your head up your ass 24/7. Take the shit out of your ears. "Revenge", "Destroyer", "Creatures Of The Night", "Alive" Heavier than anything Queen ever released. |
| Holly2003 02.07.2010 05:51 |
Don't really give a hoot what he looked like but the music was certainly better in the 70s. He was more ambitious, and more willing to take risks with Queen stuff. However, Barcelona was new and interesting, so who knows what direction his solo career would've gone. Probably more interesting that Brian's forthcoming concept album about a world ruled by badgers ... |
| andreas_mercury 02.07.2010 06:36 |
" "Revenge", "Destroyer", "Creatures Of The Night", "Alive" Heavier than anything Queen ever released." heavy yes ..... weighed down with crappy music. |
| mike hunt 02.07.2010 06:54 |
Let's not get into this Queen vs kiss bullshit. not worth arguing. I agree with holly about barcelona....easily freddie's best stuff since his heyday of the 70's. Of course the album isn't for everyone....some might find cabelle's voice a bit much, but for what it's worth Even queen 2 isn't for everyone. Doesn't mean it's not amazing. No question if freddie lived longer we would have seen more great albums like barcelona..albums that no one else could have made. Of course the ham couldn't resist another dance album that would have made his fans cringe like mr. bad guy. |
| andreas_mercury 02.07.2010 11:31 |
"Let's not get into this Queen vs kiss bullshit. not worth arguing. " I apolorgize but in my defence, it was not an arguement. I was telling facts, skip is in denial... |
| Amazon 02.07.2010 14:00 |
skip wrote: "Heavier than anything Queen ever released." Heavier does not mean better. Holly2003 wrote: "Don't really give a hoot what he looked like but the music was certainly better in the 70s. He was more ambitious, and more willing to take risks with Queen stuff. However, Barcelona was new and interesting, so who knows what direction his solo career would've gone.' I definitely agree that musically he was better in the 70's than the 90's (lookswise, probably the 70's as well), but he still had some great moments in the 80's. Even on AKOM, IMO Queen's weakest album, he contributed arguably one of Queen's best hard rock songs in Princes of the Universe, and he was great on several other songs such as PISCTP, FWBF and WWTLF. 'Probably more interesting that Brian's forthcoming concept album about a world ruled by badgers ...' Ha! Good one. :D |
| mike hunt 02.07.2010 14:53 |
you could tell skip is 14 years old..... |
| skip 03.07.2010 01:07 |
andreas_mercury wrote: " "Revenge", "Destroyer", "Creatures Of The Night", "Alive" Heavier than anything Queen ever released." heavy yes ..... weighed down with crappy music. ----- At least I didn't pay money to go see a band that I dislike. That would make you a dumb fuck. |
| skip 03.07.2010 01:08 |
andreas_mercury wrote: "Let's not get into this Queen vs kiss bullshit. not worth arguing. " I apolorgize but in my defence, it was not an arguement. I was telling facts, skip is in denial... ---- Work on your English, dumb fuck. |
| skip 03.07.2010 01:10 |
mike hunt wrote: you could tell skip is 14 years old..... ---- You'd be wrong, dumbass. Not the first time either. |
| lifetimefanofqueen 03.07.2010 06:40 |
Queen vs kiss ?!?! how is that a question of who wins? QUEEN OF COURSE THEY ARE THE NO.1 BEST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! AND WE LOVE THEM XD xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| skip 03.07.2010 23:55 |
lifetimefanofqueen wrote: Queen vs kiss ?!?! how is that a question of who wins? QUEEN OF COURSE THEY ARE THE NO.1 BEST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! AND WE LOVE THEM XD xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ----- Any band who released an lp called "Hot Space" could never be considered "the NO. 1 BEST". |
| Gregsynth 04.07.2010 00:24 |
All great bands have a weak album or two. Nothing wrong with that. |
| skip 04.07.2010 02:07 |
Gregsynth wrote: All great bands have a weak album or two. Nothing wrong with that. ----- Correct on the first part. A great band shouldn't have a weak album or two. |
| Gregsynth 04.07.2010 03:14 |
So Queen isn't a great band then (since you hate Hot Space)? |
| andreas_mercury 04.07.2010 05:36 |
"At least I didn't pay money to go see a band that I dislike." you are an idiot my friend, i like kiss and it is not even my fault that i pay tickets to see their show (to see a great show) and all i get is raspy singing and a bad sound. oh and fireworks but maybe that will fix everything, right .... |
| mike hunt 04.07.2010 08:46 |
skip wrote: Gregsynth wrote: All great bands have a weak album or two. Nothing wrong with that. ----- Correct on the first part. A great band shouldn't have a weak album or two. Who say's Queen has two bad albums?.......and any band that was around for over 10 or 20 years have released a few weaker albums. The stones?......almost every kiss album was weak....Especially the 80's to the present....that's a lot of bad shit, more than 1 or 2 albums for sure. Even the who towards the end were not releasing the greatest albums in the world. A band usually only has about 8 prime years. |
| freddiefan91 05.07.2010 02:55 |
Freddie probably wrote better songs in the 70s ie for example Boh Rap, We are the Champions, Killer Queen and Somebody to Love but he also wrote some great songs in the 80's, Its a hard life, play the game and princes of the universe come to mind Also i see the subject of Hot Space has come up again but its still a decent album, its because people are used to Queen being a rock band that they don't particularly like an album which is more of a funk/dance album I know some people wont agree but if we all agreed on everything it would be a very boring world |
| skip 05.07.2010 15:20 |
Gregsynth wrote: So Queen isn't a great band then (since you hate Hot Space)? ---- They sure weren't perfect. |
| skip 05.07.2010 15:22 |
andreas_mercury wrote: "At least I didn't pay money to go see a band that I dislike." you are an idiot my friend, i like kiss and it is not even my fault that i pay tickets to see their show (to see a great show) and all i get is raspy singing and a bad sound. oh and fireworks but maybe that will fix everything, right .... --- ESL. Try it. |
| andreas_mercury 06.07.2010 06:07 |
you didn't answer the post i wrote, though. how can you explain to me that the show of kiss i just paid to see was so awful? |
| matt z 06.07.2010 16:37 |
70's mercury... less drugs, smoke and booze, aspiring artists chances and hopes = better music. not that the 80's music was bad... that had it's great moments, but for THE FIRST TIME [on the works] exhibited a "ehh.. i'm gonna skip that one..." from me.. GREAT? HELL YEA... INFALLIBLE?... nah Plus... that gay clone moustache... not like it's the biggest thing...nothing against "queers"... but it kinda got cartooned more than the glam days... TO THIS I POSIT A QUESTION: WHY DOESN'T ANYONE RAG ON JOHN DEACON'S RADIO GA GA FRO? C'mon... you can't tell me that old tripe that no one pays attention to the bassist! |
| skip 07.07.2010 01:52 |
andreas_mercury wrote: you didn't answer the post i wrote, though. how can you explain to me that the show of kiss i just paid to see was so awful? --------- I'll answer your questions when you have a command of the English language. |
| andreas_mercury 07.07.2010 11:21 |
how can you explain that kiss played alright but the singing was awful at the last show I went to? |
| skip 08.07.2010 00:51 |
andreas_mercury wrote: how can you explain that kiss played alright but the singing was awful at the last show I went to? ---- Paul had been sick for a few of the shows on the European tour. They had to drop three of his songs at a couple of the shows on the tour. Even with Paul not at 100% the audiences had a great time. You didn't. No big deal. |
| andreas_mercury 08.07.2010 07:00 |
simple answer to this simple question and it took you all those posts to get to it ..... |
| Amazon 08.07.2010 08:16 |
mike hunt wrote:'Who say's Queen has two bad albums?' I don't think they do. It's all relative though. The Works and AKOM are IMO Queen's two weakest studio albums, but I think they are vastly superior to plenty of non-Queen albums. Not to mention that every Queen studio album features at least two songs (and often more) which IMO are terrific. If I presented someone a compliation covering Queen's entire career, I could easily find room for every album (with the possible exception of Flash, however that doesn't count). skip wrote: 'They sure weren't perfect.' No artist is. In fact, I wouldn't want Queen to be perfect. If they were, they probably wouldn't have been as bold. |
| skip 08.07.2010 23:53 |
Amazon wrote: mike hunt wrote:'Who say's Queen has two bad albums?' I don't think they do. It's all relative though. The Works and AKOM are IMO Queen's two weakest studio albums, but I think they are vastly superior to plenty of non-Queen albums. Not to mention that every Queen studio album features at least two songs (and often more) which IMO are terrific. If I presented someone a compliation covering Queen's entire career, I could easily find room for every album (with the possible exception of Flash, however that doesn't count). skip wrote: 'They sure weren't perfect.' No artist is. In fact, I wouldn't want Queen to be perfect. If they were, they probably wouldn't have been as bold. ---- I'd rather listen to a band who writes songs in different genres (Queen, KISS) than listen to a band who writes the same exact song over and over again (AC/DC). That doesn't necessarily mean that I like the outcome of that experimentation. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. |
| mike hunt 09.07.2010 06:50 |
skip wrote: Amazon wrote: mike hunt wrote:'Who say's Queen has two bad albums?' I don't think they do. It's all relative though. The Works and AKOM are IMO Queen's two weakest studio albums, but I think they are vastly superior to plenty of non-Queen albums. Not to mention that every Queen studio album features at least two songs (and often more) which IMO are terrific. If I presented someone a compliation covering Queen's entire career, I could easily find room for every album (with the possible exception of Flash, however that doesn't count). skip wrote: 'They sure weren't perfect.' No artist is. In fact, I wouldn't want Queen to be perfect. If they were, they probably wouldn't have been as bold. ---- I'd rather listen to a band who writes songs in different genres (Queen, KISS) than listen to a band who writes the same exact song over and over again (AC/DC). That doesn't necessarily mean that I like the outcome of that experimentation. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. Wow skip, that's the most normal thing you said on this site....I'm proud of you!....AC/DC bores the hell out me. |
| sharoncooper 09.07.2010 21:36 |
I prefer 70s Freddie. I love the way he looked. I also love the way he dressed.I think he looked okay in the 80S.He was hot alway. |
| plumrach 12.07.2010 02:49 |
The works is one of my favorite albums, i dont think its weak at all, half the songs on the album are brilliant and the other 5 are still quite good Radio Gaga - Excellent Hammer to Fall - Excellent Its a hard life - Excellent I want to break free - Excellent Is this the world we created - beautiful Tear it up - love it |
| Marina K. 14.07.2010 01:33 |
plumrach wrote: The works is one of my favorite albums, i dont think its weak at all, half the songs on the album are brilliant and the other 5 are still quite good Radio Gaga - Excellent Hammer to Fall - Excellent Its a hard life - Excellent I want to break free - Excellent Is this the world we created - beautiful Tear it up - love it -------------------------------------------------- Absolutely agree! These 6 are brilliant!!!And you call them weak? So what the hell you call the album weak?! And Hot Space for me ISN'T A BAD ALBUM! Just an experiment, just another style. |
| john bodega 14.07.2010 04:07 |
I don't think the guy should be crucified for having creative ups and downs, in either case. Even if someone thinks Hot Space is a flaming pile of crap, I think the guy more than earned his right to go and record whatever the hell he wanted. He made up for it with Innuendo. |
| Marina K. 14.07.2010 07:14 |
totally agree with Zebonka12 |
| plumrach 14.07.2010 09:02 |
ive always said that hot space is a good album, the only thing some people dont like about it is that its not a rock album but I like the fact that Queen branched out a bit |
| mike hunt 14.07.2010 09:42 |
plumrach wrote: The works is one of my favorite albums, i dont think its weak at all, half the songs on the album are brilliant and the other 5 are still quite good Radio Gaga - Excellent Hammer to Fall - Excellent Its a hard life - Excellent I want to break free - Excellent Is this the world we created - beautiful Tear it up - love it agree with some of you're choices, but 'tear it up' is weak IMO. the works is a middle of the road album for me...not great, not weak. pretty good is more like it. Of course it's all opinion anyway. |
| plumrach 14.07.2010 10:55 |
can you imagine if we all agreed on everything the world would be a very boring place |
| mike hunt 14.07.2010 11:27 |
plumrach wrote: ive always said that hot space is a good album, the only thing some people dont like about it is that its not a rock album but I like the fact that Queen branched out a bit I'm glad they did hot space......i just wish the music was heavier, tighter. The way the songs sounded at live at the bowl.....As it is, it's still a fun record. I go on long road trips by myself, the road and my music.. Hot space got quite the spins on my long drives. One of their weaker albums for sure, doesn't have many clear cut classics like most others have, but still is a cool album. Only the 'coolcats" could appreaciate this one. |