Treasure Moment 07.01.2009 19:17 |
My brother did a remix and put some things on the original these are the days of our lives, check it out if you want link |
Major Tom 07.01.2009 20:52 |
Let me be the first to say: Congratulations! You have managed to find the worst picture of Freddie. Also let me be the first to say: Congratulations! This song is AWESOME, but wait! NAAAH, you almost had me there! Seriously, you brother has some skills with the piano, I give him that. You've turned into a coverband, great! |
Treasure Moment 08.01.2009 00:27 |
Dr. Pepper(The Spiceman) wrote: Let me be the first to say: Congratulations! You have managed to find the worst picture of Freddie. Also let me be the first to say: Congratulations! This song is AWESOME, but wait! NAAAH, you almost had me there! Seriously, you brother has some skills with the piano, I give him that. You've turned into a coverband, great! I like that pic and no we arent a cover band, its the original song with added stuff. |
inu-liger 08.01.2009 00:38 |
Decent. Needs less strings, I think. And this technically a fan cover in a way, not a remix at all. Remix would have to include re-arranging the original itself in terms of mixing. This isn't far off from all those other YouTube fan (guitar / bass / drum) covers. I'll give too, your brother did some good piano work here. I didn't like the piano overpowering the guitar solo however. |
inu-liger 08.01.2009 00:50 |
By the way, and let's be serious here, when do you guys plan to announce some new original rock-based material? (particularly songs that aren't piano-driven EuroPop material) |
Vali 08.01.2009 03:44 |
inu-liger wrote:
. I didn't like the piano overpowering the guitar solo however.
totally agree on that |
Major Tom 08.01.2009 05:58 |
Yes it's acually nice. Really. But, as Inu and Vali mentioned, I also find the lack of Brian to be a little...disturbing. |
inu-liger 08.01.2009 06:19 |
Hmm! If you add &fmt=18 to the link, the stereo version keeps the keyboards in the middle, so we're able to hear Brian a bit better. link |
thomasquinn 32989 08.01.2009 07:25 |
The additional piano provides absolutely nothing apart from a slight thickening of the orchestration, as it does nothing except copy the vocal lines, and thus distract from them, and give the occasional flurry of harmony where, again, nothing is provided that wasn't in the original arrangement. Also, the piano is poorly mixed in, as it is eq-ed badly: too much high end, too little mid range (it should have been mixed to support the synthesizers, not to overtake the vocals). All in all, I think this is a pretty poor effort, but better than usual TM level, mostly because it is mercifully covered up by a good Queen song. |
Micrówave 08.01.2009 11:55 |
We, the collective sheep of Queenzone, are giving musical advice to TM. Isn't that like trying to teach Jesus to waterski? |
thomasquinn 32989 08.01.2009 13:29 |
Micrówave wrote: We, the collective sheep of Queenzone, are giving musical advice to TM. Isn't that like trying to teach Jesus to waterski? Yes. And nobody can say we haven't tried. |
Treasure Moment 08.01.2009 14:15 |
inu-liger wrote: Decent. Needs less strings, I think. And this technically a fan cover in a way, not a remix at all. Remix would have to include re-arranging the original itself in terms of mixing. This isn't far off from all those other YouTube fan (guitar / bass / drum) covers. I'll give too, your brother did some good piano work here. I didn't like the piano overpowering the guitar solo however. Well i didnt know what to call it so i called it a remix since there are some new stuff added to the song. |
Treasure Moment 08.01.2009 14:16 |
inu-liger wrote: By the way, and let's be serious here, when do you guys plan to announce some new original rock-based material? (particularly songs that aren't piano-driven EuroPop material) Most of the songs are piano/synth driven because most of the songs are written on the piano and then the guitar is added on but we have songs that are guitar driven too. |
Treasure Moment 08.01.2009 14:21 |
ThomasQuinn wrote: The additional piano provides absolutely nothing apart from a slight thickening of the orchestration, as it does nothing except copy the vocal lines, and thus distract from them, and give the occasional flurry of harmony where, again, nothing is provided that wasn't in the original arrangement. Also, the piano is poorly mixed in, as it is eq-ed badly: too much high end, too little mid range (it should have been mixed to support the synthesizers, not to overtake the vocals). All in all, I think this is a pretty poor effort, but better than usual TM level, mostly because it is mercifully covered up by a good Queen song. Well thomas as you would know by now i dont care what people think we should do or not do, i just shared the song, not waiting for advices as we already know ourselves if its good or not or if it needs something more or not, we are musicians and know what we are doing and the song is just fine as it is. Of course most of it is thickening the song because we felt that the instrumentation on the original song wasnt thick and it needed that for the song to be stronger but there are some new things other than that added, you mean the piano melody on the solo is nothing new? Keep complaining about our songs, you should know by now that i dont give a damn what you or anyone else talking shit about us think and giving us "advices" |
Treasure Moment 08.01.2009 14:22 |
ThomasQuinn wrote:Micrówave wrote: We, the collective sheep of Queenzone, are giving musical advice to TM. Isn't that like trying to teach Jesus to waterski?Yes. And nobody can say we haven't tried. As i said, we are musicians and we know what we are doing and dont need people picking on our music. |
inu-liger 08.01.2009 21:04 |
Treasure Moment wrote:That's been quite obvious for a long timeThomasQuinn wrote: The additional piano provides absolutely nothing apart from a slight thickening of the orchestration, as it does nothing except copy the vocal lines, and thus distract from them, and give the occasional flurry of harmony where, again, nothing is provided that wasn't in the original arrangement. Also, the piano is poorly mixed in, as it is eq-ed badly: too much high end, too little mid range (it should have been mixed to support the synthesizers, not to overtake the vocals). All in all, I think this is a pretty poor effort, but better than usual TM level, mostly because it is mercifully covered up by a good Queen song.Well thomas as you would know by now i dont care what people think we should do or not do, i just shared the song, not waiting for advices as we already know ourselves if its good or not or if it needs something more or not, we are musicians and know what we are doing and the song is just fine as it is. Of course most of it is thickening the song because we felt that the instrumentation on the original song wasnt thick and it needed that for the song to be stronger but there are some new things other than that added, you mean the piano melody on the solo is nothing new? Keep complaining about our songs, you should know by now that i dont give a damn what you or anyone else talking shit about us think and giving us "advices" With that attitude, you're seriously never going to get anywhere as a musician or as a band. These advices are, when we're not joking around, actually constructive criticism, which we DO try from time to time to give to you guys so that you can learn from your experiences and mistakes, and learn to get better as musicians and as a band. Honestly, if I never listened to my bandmates, family and friends when they suggested, requested or told me to do things differently in order to provide a better style of performance not only for their benefit, but my own as well, I would not be in the band now, nor any other band for that matter (and Edmonton has a pretty well-connected local music scene, so word spreads fast when need be) I'm honestly flabbergasted that you would brush off even any minute suggestions even when in the positive! Where do you get off being so damn brash? |
inu-liger 08.01.2009 21:07 |
Treasure Moment wrote:ThomasQuinn wrote:As i said, we are musicians and we know what we are doing and dont need people picking on our music.Micrówave wrote: We, the collective sheep of Queenzone, are giving musical advice to TM. Isn't that like trying to teach Jesus to waterski?Yes. And nobody can say we haven't tried. It would help to reduce your music being picked on if you didn't take an up-yours attitude towards us, claiming your band is the best ever, we're all sheep, etc. etc. ... same old bullshit If you would admit your wrongdoings and make an about-face, there IS a chance you'll be forgiven and eventually taken seriously. And I'm not joking when I say this. |
inu-liger 08.01.2009 21:09 |
Treasure Moment wrote:inu-liger wrote: By the way, and let's be serious here, when do you guys plan to announce some new original rock-based material? (particularly songs that aren't piano-driven EuroPop material)Most of the songs are piano/synth driven because most of the songs are written on the piano and then the guitar is added on but we have songs that are guitar driven too. Then why the delay in putting out even new demos with that guitar driven material? Honestly, you should make it a goal to produce and put out more music in this new year, whether or not you and Max perform as TM in the style of BM/RT as Queen (if rumours that Milidrag quitting are true). I would be willing to extend an olive branch in helping produce drum tracks even, and bass too. |
thomasquinn 32989 09.01.2009 08:07 |
inu-liger wrote:Treasure Moment wrote:It would help to reduce your music being picked on if you didn't take an up-yours attitude towards us, claiming your band is the best ever, we're all sheep, etc. etc. ... same old bullshit If you would admit your wrongdoings and make an about-face, there IS a chance you'll be forgiven and eventually taken seriously. And I'm not joking when I say this.ThomasQuinn wrote:As i said, we are musicians and we know what we are doing and dont need people picking on our music.Micrówave wrote: We, the collective sheep of Queenzone, are giving musical advice to TM. Isn't that like trying to teach Jesus to waterski?Yes. And nobody can say we haven't tried. It would also help tremendously if they stopped recording two-chord vamps and calling those "songs". TM seems to believe that a harmonic structure devoid of anything else makes a song. |
Treasure Moment 09.01.2009 11:52 |
ThomasQuinn wrote:inu-liger wrote:It would also help tremendously if they stopped recording two-chord vamps and calling those "songs". TM seems to believe that a harmonic structure devoid of anything else makes a song.Treasure Moment wrote:It would help to reduce your music being picked on if you didn't take an up-yours attitude towards us, claiming your band is the best ever, we're all sheep, etc. etc. ... same old bullshit If you would admit your wrongdoings and make an about-face, there IS a chance you'll be forgiven and eventually taken seriously. And I'm not joking when I say this.ThomasQuinn wrote:As i said, we are musicians and we know what we are doing and dont need people picking on our music.Micrówave wrote: We, the collective sheep of Queenzone, are giving musical advice to TM. Isn't that like trying to teach Jesus to waterski?Yes. And nobody can say we haven't tried. shut up already, you would never in your life be capable of writing stuff we do, you know nothing about music :) |
Treasure Moment 09.01.2009 11:52 |
inu-liger wrote:Treasure Moment wrote:It would help to reduce your music being picked on if you didn't take an up-yours attitude towards us, claiming your band is the best ever, we're all sheep, etc. etc. ... same old bullshit If you would admit your wrongdoings and make an about-face, there IS a chance you'll be forgiven and eventually taken seriously. And I'm not joking when I say this.ThomasQuinn wrote:As i said, we are musicians and we know what we are doing and dont need people picking on our music.Micrówave wrote: We, the collective sheep of Queenzone, are giving musical advice to TM. Isn't that like trying to teach Jesus to waterski?Yes. And nobody can say we haven't tried. im just telling it like it is, nothing more or less. |
Treasure Moment 09.01.2009 11:54 |
inu-liger wrote:Treasure Moment wrote:Then why the delay in putting out even new demos with that guitar driven material? Honestly, you should make it a goal to produce and put out more music in this new year, whether or not you and Max perform as TM in the style of BM/RT as Queen (if rumours that Milidrag quitting are true). I would be willing to extend an olive branch in helping produce drum tracks even, and bass too.inu-liger wrote: By the way, and let's be serious here, when do you guys plan to announce some new original rock-based material? (particularly songs that aren't piano-driven EuroPop material)Most of the songs are piano/synth driven because most of the songs are written on the piano and then the guitar is added on but we have songs that are guitar driven too. we are already an almost full band but thanks anyways, we just need a singer. We have alot of material but havent recorded it. |
inu-liger 09.01.2009 15:19 |
Treasure Moment wrote:inu-liger wrote:we are already an almost full band but thanks anyways, we just need a singer. We have alot of material but havent recorded it.Treasure Moment wrote:Then why the delay in putting out even new demos with that guitar driven material? Honestly, you should make it a goal to produce and put out more music in this new year, whether or not you and Max perform as TM in the style of BM/RT as Queen (if rumours that Milidrag quitting are true). I would be willing to extend an olive branch in helping produce drum tracks even, and bass too.inu-liger wrote: By the way, and let's be serious here, when do you guys plan to announce some new original rock-based material? (particularly songs that aren't piano-driven EuroPop material)Most of the songs are piano/synth driven because most of the songs are written on the piano and then the guitar is added on but we have songs that are guitar driven too. I don't suppose you feel like pulling a Brian and leading the band with a dual role as a singer & guitarist then? Or any of the other members for that matter? And what's taking so long to record the backing tracks if I may ask? Surely you could record it, with a vocal guide track, and have it out quicker? |
inu-liger 09.01.2009 15:22 |
Treasure Moment wrote:inu-liger wrote:im just telling it like it is, nothing more or less.Treasure Moment wrote:It would help to reduce your music being picked on if you didn't take an up-yours attitude towards us, claiming your band is the best ever, we're all sheep, etc. etc. ... same old bullshit If you would admit your wrongdoings and make an about-face, there IS a chance you'll be forgiven and eventually taken seriously. And I'm not joking when I say this.ThomasQuinn wrote:As i said, we are musicians and we know what we are doing and dont need people picking on our music.Micrówave wrote: We, the collective sheep of Queenzone, are giving musical advice to TM. Isn't that like trying to teach Jesus to waterski?Yes. And nobody can say we haven't tried. Likewise. I'm speaking the blunt truth here on my part. I'll be waiting here for that moment when you finally acknowledge what I said. |
TheWrist 09.01.2009 15:54 |
so what's the deal on just adding additional keyboards to the original track??..... it's mostly annoying... |
Treasure Moment 09.01.2009 15:56 |
TheWrist wrote: so what's the deal on just adding additional keyboards to the original track??..... it's mostly annoying... annoying to you, necessary for others, we felt the song was empty as it was. |
Treasure Moment 09.01.2009 15:58 |
inu-liger wrote:Treasure Moment wrote:I don't suppose you feel like pulling a Brian and leading the band with a dual role as a singer & guitarist then? Or any of the other members for that matter? And what's taking so long to record the backing tracks if I may ask? Surely you could record it, with a vocal guide track, and have it out quicker?inu-liger wrote:we are already an almost full band but thanks anyways, we just need a singer. We have alot of material but havent recorded it.Treasure Moment wrote:Then why the delay in putting out even new demos with that guitar driven material? Honestly, you should make it a goal to produce and put out more music in this new year, whether or not you and Max perform as TM in the style of BM/RT as Queen (if rumours that Milidrag quitting are true). I would be willing to extend an olive branch in helping produce drum tracks even, and bass too.inu-liger wrote: By the way, and let's be serious here, when do you guys plan to announce some new original rock-based material? (particularly songs that aren't piano-driven EuroPop material)Most of the songs are piano/synth driven because most of the songs are written on the piano and then the guitar is added on but we have songs that are guitar driven too. Yeah we have thought about that but im not an experienced singer and i dont think my brother is made for singing either so it has to be something else, sure we could record the new stuff but we arent in a hurry since we dont have a singer right now. |
Winter Land Man 09.01.2009 19:45 |
Treasure Moment wrote:Dr. Pepper(The Spiceman) wrote: Let me be the first to say: Congratulations! You have managed to find the worst picture of Freddie. Also let me be the first to say: Congratulations! This song is AWESOME, but wait! NAAAH, you almost had me there! Seriously, you brother has some skills with the piano, I give him that. You've turned into a coverband, great!I like that pic and no we arent a cover band, its the original song with added stuff. With a very BRITNEY SPEARS keyboard introduction that your brother added. |
Treasure Moment 09.01.2009 20:24 |
Play The Game wrote:Treasure Moment wrote:With a very BRITNEY SPEARS keyboard introduction that your brother added.Dr. Pepper(The Spiceman) wrote: Let me be the first to say: Congratulations! You have managed to find the worst picture of Freddie. Also let me be the first to say: Congratulations! This song is AWESOME, but wait! NAAAH, you almost had me there! Seriously, you brother has some skills with the piano, I give him that. You've turned into a coverband, great!I like that pic and no we arent a cover band, its the original song with added stuff. Another braindead retard with a stupid comment....what a surprise! |
Marcos Napier 09.01.2009 22:56 |
Micrówave wrote: We, the collective sheep of Queenzone, are giving musical advice to TM. Isn't that like trying to teach Jesus to waterski? Without the help of Moses... I dunno. |
inu-liger 09.01.2009 23:20 |
Marcos Napier wrote:Micrówave wrote: We, the collective sheep of Queenzone, are giving musical advice to TM. Isn't that like trying to teach Jesus to waterski?Without the help of Moses... I dunno. LOL Marcos! Surf's Up... |
inu-liger 09.01.2009 23:25 |
Treasure Moment wrote:inu-liger wrote:Yeah we have thought about that but im not an experienced singer and i dont think my brother is made for singing either so it has to be something else, sure we could record the new stuff but we arent in a hurry since we dont have a singer right now.Treasure Moment wrote:I don't suppose you feel like pulling a Brian and leading the band with a dual role as a singer & guitarist then? Or any of the other members for that matter? And what's taking so long to record the backing tracks if I may ask? Surely you could record it, with a vocal guide track, and have it out quicker?inu-liger wrote:we are already an almost full band but thanks anyways, we just need a singer. We have alot of material but havent recorded it.Treasure Moment wrote:Then why the delay in putting out even new demos with that guitar driven material? Honestly, you should make it a goal to produce and put out more music in this new year, whether or not you and Max perform as TM in the style of BM/RT as Queen (if rumours that Milidrag quitting are true). I would be willing to extend an olive branch in helping produce drum tracks even, and bass too.inu-liger wrote: By the way, and let's be serious here, when do you guys plan to announce some new original rock-based material? (particularly songs that aren't piano-driven EuroPop material)Most of the songs are piano/synth driven because most of the songs are written on the piano and then the guitar is added on but we have songs that are guitar driven too. Well, I'd like to see you make it a goal to at least have some rock material, vocals or no vocals, out by summertime. Something that's honestly not neo-classical, but more Queen-like in rock style, or hard rock in general. I've seen some of your death metal riffs on YouTube, and that's more within my style (although I hate grunge/death metal vocalists, since I can't understand a fucking word they're singing beyond the puke singing I hear otherwise) than keyboard stuff. You've got some good ideas here and there that I wouldn't mind seeing further developed with your band. That keyboard stuff your brother does is better suited for a budget anime background soundtrack (OST) than for 'mainstream'. That kind of stuff will honestly not get you anywhere in the charts anywhere to begin with, regardless if you get signed or release independently. |
Treasure Moment 10.01.2009 00:34 |
inu-liger wrote:Treasure Moment wrote:Well, I'd like to see you make it a goal to at least have some rock material, vocals or no vocals, out by summertime. Something that's honestly not neo-classical, but more Queen-like in rock style, or hard rock in general. I've seen some of your death metal riffs on YouTube, and that's more within my style (although I hate grunge/death metal vocalists, since I can't understand a fucking word they're singing beyond the puke singing I hear otherwise) than keyboard stuff. You've got some good ideas here and there that I wouldn't mind seeing further developed with your band. That keyboard stuff your brother does is better suited for a budget anime background soundtrack (OST) than for 'mainstream'. That kind of stuff will honestly not get you anywhere in the charts anywhere to begin with, regardless if you get signed or release independently.inu-liger wrote:Yeah we have thought about that but im not an experienced singer and i dont think my brother is made for singing either so it has to be something else, sure we could record the new stuff but we arent in a hurry since we dont have a singer right now.Treasure Moment wrote:I don't suppose you feel like pulling a Brian and leading the band with a dual role as a singer & guitarist then? Or any of the other members for that matter? And what's taking so long to record the backing tracks if I may ask? Surely you could record it, with a vocal guide track, and have it out quicker?inu-liger wrote:we are already an almost full band but thanks anyways, we just need a singer. We have alot of material but havent recorded it.Treasure Moment wrote:Then why the delay in putting out even new demos with that guitar driven material? Honestly, you should make it a goal to produce and put out more music in this new year, whether or not you and Max perform as TM in the style of BM/RT as Queen (if rumours that Milidrag quitting are true). I would be willing to extend an olive branch in helping produce drum tracks even, and bass too.inu-liger wrote: By the way, and let's be serious here, when do you guys plan to announce some new original rock-based material? (particularly songs that aren't piano-driven EuroPop material)Most of the songs are piano/synth driven because most of the songs are written on the piano and then the guitar is added on but we have songs that are guitar driven too. Well, the death metal stuff i cant use in TM, thats a totally different thing than TM so i have to use that in a heavier metal band(although my song "transition" has some heavy metal things in it, check it out on the site if you want). The stuff in TM style wise is more like late era Queen, the strings and piano stuff are very much like late Queen stuff so if we cant get anywhere with that then how come Queen did? its not about that anyways, its about doing music we like and we like the stuff we do and thats all that matters, trying to adjust the music to what other people might like is just silly, we play what we like and if other people like it too then great, if not thats ok too but we arent changing. |
inu-liger 10.01.2009 02:57 |
Treasure Moment wrote:inu-liger wrote:Well, the death metal stuff i cant use in TM, thats a totally different thing than TM so i have to use that in a heavier metal band(although my song "transition" has some heavy metal things in it, check it out on the site if you want). The stuff in TM style wise is more like late era Queen, the strings and piano stuff are very much like late Queen stuff so if we cant get anywhere with that then how come Queen did? its not about that anyways, its about doing music we like and we like the stuff we do and thats all that matters, trying to adjust the music to what other people might like is just silly, we play what we like and if other people like it too then great, if not thats ok too but we arent changing.Treasure Moment wrote:Well, I'd like to see you make it a goal to at least have some rock material, vocals or no vocals, out by summertime. Something that's honestly not neo-classical, but more Queen-like in rock style, or hard rock in general. I've seen some of your death metal riffs on YouTube, and that's more within my style (although I hate grunge/death metal vocalists, since I can't understand a fucking word they're singing beyond the puke singing I hear otherwise) than keyboard stuff. You've got some good ideas here and there that I wouldn't mind seeing further developed with your band. That keyboard stuff your brother does is better suited for a budget anime background soundtrack (OST) than for 'mainstream'. That kind of stuff will honestly not get you anywhere in the charts anywhere to begin with, regardless if you get signed or release independently.inu-liger wrote:Yeah we have thought about that but im not an experienced singer and i dont think my brother is made for singing either so it has to be something else, sure we could record the new stuff but we arent in a hurry since we dont have a singer right now.Treasure Moment wrote:I don't suppose you feel like pulling a Brian and leading the band with a dual role as a singer & guitarist then? Or any of the other members for that matter? And what's taking so long to record the backing tracks if I may ask? Surely you could record it, with a vocal guide track, and have it out quicker?inu-liger wrote:we are already an almost full band but thanks anyways, we just need a singer. We have alot of material but havent recorded it.Treasure Moment wrote:Then why the delay in putting out even new demos with that guitar driven material? Honestly, you should make it a goal to produce and put out more music in this new year, whether or not you and Max perform as TM in the style of BM/RT as Queen (if rumours that Milidrag quitting are true). I would be willing to extend an olive branch in helping produce drum tracks even, and bass too.inu-liger wrote: By the way, and let's be serious here, when do you guys plan to announce some new original rock-based material? (particularly songs that aren't piano-driven EuroPop material)Most of the songs are piano/synth driven because most of the songs are written on the piano and then the guitar is added on but we have songs that are guitar driven too. Dude, don't take it too personally, but your synth string stuff does NOT sound like Queen in any way. I'm sorry, it just does not, and I don't care how self-convinced you are otherwise. Queen did not rely heavily on strings in the late 80's either, unless you listen strictly to Bijou and/or The Show Must Go On infinitely. Also, they had a certain sound and style that is very difficult to re-create even in coverband songs. Your sound just doesn't fit that mold, I'm sorry. Queen did have some classical influence in their writing style, yes, but that was not something they were wholly known for. They were known first-and-foremost as a ROCK band. Your band as of lately is on the way to being considered a neo-classical duo rather than the rock outfit you dream of emulating Queen as. Also, one other reason you're not getting anywhere is because you have not been trying hard enough, quite obviously. How long have you been searching for a singer? How many people have you auditioned, and turned down (probably just because they couldn't sing like Freddie)? How much time do you spend even each week as a BAND, regardless of member count, practicing, rehearsing and writing/building on your material? How long will it take for you to learn to take and acknowledge constructive criticism from other people than yourselves? I'm sorry, but besides otherwise budding musical talent starting to finally show now, with your attitude and total lack of regard for other people's genuine opinions, I doubt even a local indie label would take on a band whose members seem to do nothing but have in-fighting and lack of passable new material to give the label(s) incentive to invest in your band financially. You won't attract lasting crowds during your shows either (as in people who would give you the benefit of paying to attend your shows -more than once-) if things don't turn around upwards from here on. If you want to choose to spend the rest of your life making keyboard music that very few people will show some appreciation for over the years, that's your prerogative, but maybe at some point you might want to wake up and smell the coffee. Once again I'm not joking here at all. I'm being very blunt and straight to the point when I say this. |
thomasquinn 32989 10.01.2009 07:00 |
ThomasQuinn wrote: The additional piano provides absolutely nothing apart from a slight thickening of the orchestration, as it does nothing except copy the vocal lines, and thus distract from them, and give the occasional flurry of harmony where, again, nothing is provided that wasn't in the original arrangement. Also, the piano is poorly mixed in, as it is eq-ed badly: too much high end, too little mid range (it should have been mixed to support the synthesizers, not to overtake the vocals). All in all, I think this is a pretty poor effort, but better than usual TM level, mostly because it is mercifully covered up by a good Queen song. That's all I can say about this vicious abuse of a good song. |
Treasure Moment 10.01.2009 16:52 |
ThomasQuinn wrote:ThomasQuinn wrote: The additional piano provides absolutely nothing apart from a slight thickening of the orchestration, as it does nothing except copy the vocal lines, and thus distract from them, and give the occasional flurry of harmony where, again, nothing is provided that wasn't in the original arrangement. Also, the piano is poorly mixed in, as it is eq-ed badly: too much high end, too little mid range (it should have been mixed to support the synthesizers, not to overtake the vocals). All in all, I think this is a pretty poor effort, but better than usual TM level, mostly because it is mercifully covered up by a good Queen song.That's all I can say about this vicious abuse of a good song. you are not a smart person, thats for sure :) |
inu-liger 10.01.2009 21:11 |
You bastard, don't ignore my questions! :-( |
Treasure Moment 10.01.2009 21:48 |
inu-liger wrote: You bastard, don't ignore my questions! :-( no i didnt, i tried to answer it but got a "sorry there is an error" sign, this forum has errors when you try to post |
Treasure Moment 10.01.2009 21:49 |
to Inu I could say the same thing about you, that your band sounds like 1000 other bands playing that style and you would never get anywhere but do i? its your style and you play what you like and who am i to come and tell you to change your style? so you should stay out of giving us advices on how we should make music. We are musicians and we know what we are doing and we LIKE the stuff we make and thats ALL that matters, i dont give a fuck what people think of our music, as long as i like it thats all that matters, and you are right that its the same style as show must go on and bjiou and thats what ive always said, that we like the late era Queen and innuendo is by far our favourite album. |
inu-liger 10.01.2009 22:33 |
I appreciate that you acknowledge what I said about TSMGO & Bijou then, that's fine that you like that certain period of Queen's musical history. Everyone has their likes and dislikes But what irks me and most the other posters is how you go about basically saying that you guys *are* Queen in every way but band member. We have been trying to tell you this for the longest while now, you sound absolutely NOTHING like Queen. There are over 100 fans on this board I'm sure, even if a good portion of them don't post daily here. And many of us, many against the two of you, have said you do not sound like Queen, your music is not very much in any way like Queen, and you guys are certainly not Queen. That doesn't go without saying, on my part, that I can see where in some parts of your songs, like "Tills Jag Faller", where your *influences* from Queen come from, like the brief layered guitar solo, but it at the same time sounds no way like Queen. If you want to sound like Brian May, for starters buy a Red Special guitar. Want more Brian-like tones? Buy the Digitech Brian May pedal (I own one actually! Pretty nice thing), and a Deaky amp made by Vox. The list goes on. Do your research. Otherwise, sure there are a lot of other rock bands out there that use multi-layer guitars and/or harmonies, but they usually do it in their own style, and not that of Queen's. Else you have your own layered sound on the other hand, which is your own and not very Queen-y in a way I could otherwise instantly say "Oh! This sounds like !". |
Treasure Moment 11.01.2009 07:37 |
inu-liger wrote: I appreciate that you acknowledge what I said about TSMGO & Bijou then, that's fine that you like that certain period of Queen's musical history. Everyone has their likes and dislikes But what irks me and most the other posters is how you go about basically saying that you guys *are* Queen in every way but band member. We have been trying to tell you this for the longest while now, you sound absolutely NOTHING like Queen. There are over 100 fans on this board I'm sure, even if a good portion of them don't post daily here. And many of us, many against the two of you, have said you do not sound like Queen, your music is not very much in any way like Queen, and you guys are certainly not Queen. That doesn't go without saying, on my part, that I can see where in some parts of your songs, like "Tills Jag Faller", where your *influences* from Queen come from, like the brief layered guitar solo, but it at the same time sounds no way like Queen. If you want to sound like Brian May, for starters buy a Red Special guitar. Want more Brian-like tones? Buy the Digitech Brian May pedal (I own one actually! Pretty nice thing), and a Deaky amp made by Vox. The list goes on. Do your research. Otherwise, sure there are a lot of other rock bands out there that use multi-layer guitars and/or harmonies, but they usually do it in their own style, and not that of Queen's. Else you have your own layered sound on the other hand, which is your own and not very Queen-y in a way I could otherwise instantly say "Oh! This sounds like !". When im saying that we are in a way like Queen i mean that we try to make the best quality music as possible and that we have a certain style that is like the late era queen songs, not that we play every single style that Queen has played because we dont, we try to have variety but we are nowhere to Queen when it comes to that and i said innuendo is our favourite album but of course we love everything else by Queen too. Also we dont want to copy queen so i wont be getting a red special or anything like that, we dont want to copy anything from Queen, we just happen to have some of their style, the classical influence, strings, synth, guitar etc used in a certain way to get a certain sound, thats it. |
thomasquinn 32989 11.01.2009 12:00 |
There is absolutely *nothing* classical about your music. What in the name of sh*t do you call classical? |
Treasure Moment 11.01.2009 12:19 |
ThomasQuinn wrote: There is absolutely *nothing* classical about your music. What in the name of sh*t do you call classical? STFU already stupid idiot, you dont understand anything about music so dont try to act like you do :) |
thomasquinn 32989 11.01.2009 12:36 |
Little boy, I compose film music; I study music theory (and the whole point about classical music is that it revolves, one way or another, about *classical theory*; that's the main difference with other styles; no other style of music demands so absolutely and strenuously that composers are familiar with theory), I study philosophy of music, I have analyzed quite a number of compositions, classical and other, and I concern myself with music in every way I can. Do not tell me that I do not know music, because you are making a fool of yourself. It is the one thing I can be absolutely sure I know more about than you. And you still haven't answered my question: what is classical music, according to you? And what is classical about *your* music? |
Treasure Moment 11.01.2009 12:54 |
ThomasQuinn wrote: Little boy, I compose film music; I study music theory (and the whole point about classical music is that it revolves, one way or another, about *classical theory*; that's the main difference with other styles; no other style of music demands so absolutely and strenuously that composers are familiar with theory), I study philosophy of music, I have analyzed quite a number of compositions, classical and other, and I concern myself with music in every way I can. Do not tell me that I do not know music, because you are making a fool of yourself. It is the one thing I can be absolutely sure I know more about than you. And you still haven't answered my question: what is classical music, according to you? And what is classical about *your* music? i dont know or care about music theory so i cant explain it that but i just know when i hear it. Our music has alot of classical influence and its better than anything you could ever compose, im just saying this because you constantly talk shit about us, must be cause of jealousy :D |
thomasquinn 32989 11.01.2009 12:55 |
Now you actually made me laugh. Thanks for that! I'm absolutely positive now that you are completely phony. |
Treasure Moment 11.01.2009 13:00 |
ThomasQuinn wrote: Now you actually made me laugh. Thanks for that! I'm absolutely positive now that you are completely phony. not really, i mean everything i say and im dead serious about it. |
thomasquinn 32989 11.01.2009 13:09 |
Alink *really* sad, then. |
inu-liger 12.01.2009 02:11 |
Treasure Moment wrote:ThomasQuinn wrote: Little boy, I compose film music; I study music theory (and the whole point about classical music is that it revolves, one way or another, about *classical theory*; that's the main difference with other styles; no other style of music demands so absolutely and strenuously that composers are familiar with theory), I study philosophy of music, I have analyzed quite a number of compositions, classical and other, and I concern myself with music in every way I can. Do not tell me that I do not know music, because you are making a fool of yourself. It is the one thing I can be absolutely sure I know more about than you. And you still haven't answered my question: what is classical music, according to you? And what is classical about *your* music?i dont know or care about music theory so i cant explain it that but i just know when i hear it. Our music has alot of classical influence and its better than anything you could ever compose, im just saying this because you constantly talk shit about us, must be cause of jealousy :D Your 'classical music' is about as classical as 1998 Britney Spears. Honestly, you either KNOW music theory by written and studied definition, or you don't. You obviously don't know, because you only go by a half-assed assumption that you understand it just because you only listen to classical music as a casual listener, not as a student taking the real deal (academic course) in a controlled, verifiable environment. |
Micrówave 12.01.2009 12:17 |
Treasure Moment wrote: i dont know or care about music theory so i cant explain it that but i just know when i hear it. and thus began a brand new Music revolution... |
Micrówave 12.01.2009 12:21 |
Thomas Quitler wrote: Little boy, I compose film music; I study music theory, I study philosophy of music, I have analyzed quite a number of compositions, classical and other, and I concern myself with music in every way I can. And you even quote yourself. Do you fight for truth, justice, and the American Way? I nominate you for Queenzone MVP. Somebody get this guy a trophy. He is clearly Superman. |
thomasquinn 32989 12.01.2009 12:27 |
Have you nothing better to do with your life? Nothing at all? |
Micrówave 12.01.2009 13:26 |
No, I have no life compared to you, oh great one. I don't compose film music; I don't study music theory anymore, I don't study philosophy of music, I have never analyzed quite a number of compositions, classical and other, and I ignore music in every way I can. What do you suggest, Kal-El? But now that you had your ass handed to you in the Gaza thread, you probably are searching for something as well. Watch out for that green glowing rock from space. (I think this is the point where you should call me a nazi again... just for fun!) |
Flush_Gurdun 12.01.2009 14:11 |
Sorry... this is horrible to listen to and very over powering on the ears... too much happening all over. The guy playing keyboards obviously plays well, but this would have sounded better maybe as a cover, not using the original. (Although it may have just sounded like a well produced midi file). I checked your MySpace and really can't hear any Queen resemblance though. Reminded me of Enigma straight off though, which is no bad thing. (The BEST BAND EVER footage on YouTube is dire). |
thomasquinn 32989 12.01.2009 14:18 |
Micrówave wrote: No, I have no life compared to you, oh great one. I don't compose film music; I don't study music theory anymore, I don't study philosophy of music, I have never analyzed quite a number of compositions, classical and other, and I ignore music in every way I can. What do you suggest, Kal-El? But now that you had your ass handed to you in the Gaza thread, you probably are searching for something as well. Watch out for that green glowing rock from space. (I think this is the point where you should call me a nazi again... just for fun!) Ah yeah, when I'm accused of not knowing anything about music, citing my credentials is the very last thing I should do, of course. And naturally, you "handed my ass to me". Also, a giant fireball destroyed France, pigs fly and you were absolutely right. Do you want me to talk more bullshit, or will this do for you? |
Micrówave 12.01.2009 17:47 |
I'd say you're on a roll, Kent. The Daily Planet would be proud. |
Treasure Moment 12.01.2009 18:37 |
Flush_Gurdun wrote: Sorry... this is horrible to listen to and very over powering on the ears... too much happening all over. The guy playing keyboards obviously plays well, but this would have sounded better maybe as a cover, not using the original. (Although it may have just sounded like a well produced midi file). I checked your MySpace and really can't hear any Queen resemblance though. Reminded me of Enigma straight off though, which is no bad thing. (The BEST BAND EVER footage on YouTube is dire). the best band ever footage is someone making fun of us, as i said before, we are mostly just interested in late era Queen like the innuendo album and the synth dominated album, song like i want to break free, show must go on etc. |
Treasure Moment 12.01.2009 18:38 |
ThomasQuinn wrote:Micrówave wrote: No, I have no life compared to you, oh great one. I don't compose film music; I don't study music theory anymore, I don't study philosophy of music, I have never analyzed quite a number of compositions, classical and other, and I ignore music in every way I can. What do you suggest, Kal-El? But now that you had your ass handed to you in the Gaza thread, you probably are searching for something as well. Watch out for that green glowing rock from space. (I think this is the point where you should call me a nazi again... just for fun!)Ah yeah, when I'm accused of not knowing anything about music, citing my credentials is the very last thing I should do, of course. And naturally, you "handed my ass to me". Also, a giant fireball destroyed France, pigs fly and you were absolutely right. Do you want me to talk more bullshit, or will this do for you? when it comes to music you know so much about nothing at all :) |
inu-liger 12.01.2009 23:21 |
Once again, my last post is ignored... |
Treasure Moment 13.01.2009 05:03 |
inu-liger wrote:Treasure Moment wrote:Your 'classical music' is about as classical as 1998 Britney Spears. Honestly, you either KNOW music theory by written and studied definition, or you don't. You obviously don't know, because you only go by a half-assed assumption that you understand it just because you only listen to classical music as a casual listener, not as a student taking the real deal (academic course) in a controlled, verifiable environment.ThomasQuinn wrote: Little boy, I compose film music; I study music theory (and the whole point about classical music is that it revolves, one way or another, about *classical theory*; that's the main difference with other styles; no other style of music demands so absolutely and strenuously that composers are familiar with theory), I study philosophy of music, I have analyzed quite a number of compositions, classical and other, and I concern myself with music in every way I can. Do not tell me that I do not know music, because you are making a fool of yourself. It is the one thing I can be absolutely sure I know more about than you. And you still haven't answered my question: what is classical music, according to you? And what is classical about *your* music?i dont know or care about music theory so i cant explain it that but i just know when i hear it. Our music has alot of classical influence and its better than anything you could ever compose, im just saying this because you constantly talk shit about us, must be cause of jealousy :D I can HEAR if we have classical influence or not, simple as that, i dont need unnecessary music education, we go by feeling. Whatever you want to call it, we call it good music that has depth and is creative and not predictable and has emotion. |
inu-liger 13.01.2009 05:38 |
Treasure Moment wrote:inu-liger wrote:I can HEAR if we have classical influence or not, simple as that, i dont need unnecessary music education, we go by feeling. Whatever you want to call it, we call it good music that has depth and is creative and not predictable and has emotion.Treasure Moment wrote:Your 'classical music' is about as classical as 1998 Britney Spears. Honestly, you either KNOW music theory by written and studied definition, or you don't. You obviously don't know, because you only go by a half-assed assumption that you understand it just because you only listen to classical music as a casual listener, not as a student taking the real deal (academic course) in a controlled, verifiable environment.ThomasQuinn wrote: Little boy, I compose film music; I study music theory (and the whole point about classical music is that it revolves, one way or another, about *classical theory*; that's the main difference with other styles; no other style of music demands so absolutely and strenuously that composers are familiar with theory), I study philosophy of music, I have analyzed quite a number of compositions, classical and other, and I concern myself with music in every way I can. Do not tell me that I do not know music, because you are making a fool of yourself. It is the one thing I can be absolutely sure I know more about than you. And you still haven't answered my question: what is classical music, according to you? And what is classical about *your* music?I dont know or care about music theory so i cant explain it that but i just know when i hear it. Our music has alot of classical influence and its better than anything you could ever compose, im just saying this because you constantly talk shit about us, must be cause of jealousy :D Bolded for clarification: YOU think it's good music. Unfortunately, most of us don't think that way. Also, I hardly think your music is unpredictable (Why do I get the feeling you guys always think you have the newest 'Bohemian Rhapsody' every time you come up with a crap demo?) OK, certainly YOU can hear where YOUR influence comes from, but also WE don't think it's classical in the true sense of the word at all. That said, you can't go around calling your music 'classical'. That music genre belongs to the REAL people who made REAL classical music centuries ago. I'm sure they call it classical for a reason, and therefore have the music theory courses taught in academic settings. At best, 'neo-classical' would be more proper for your style. Do you honestly think you're any better than classical composers like Beethoven or Pachelbel? Until you take music theory and demonstrate a proficient knowledge of it, you're only going to get your ass laughed at continuously over and over for your grand claims. Anyways, please less classical and more ROCK. |
inu-liger 13.01.2009 05:41 |
Also I just LOVE it when you conveniently answer my posts upon command |
inu-liger 13.01.2009 05:42 |
Micrówave wrote: No, I have no life compared to you, oh great one. I don't compose film music; I don't study music theory anymore, I don't study philosophy of music, I have never analyzed quite a number of compositions, classical and other, and I ignore music in every way I can. What do you suggest, Kal-El? But now that you had your ass handed to you in the Gaza thread, you probably are searching for something as well. Watch out for that green glowing rock from space. (I think this is the point where you should call me a nazi again... just for fun!) Dude, this is not cool, seriously. If you fuckmates wanna continue fighting elsewhere, by all means make your own goddamn topic for yourselfs in Personal or whatever, but STOP bringing it into other topics that are irrelevant to your bitchslapping. |
thomasquinn 32989 13.01.2009 06:24 |
TM's music creative, and not predictable? So playing arpeggios while never leaving the home key is creative and unpredictable now? And "classically influenced" because TM thinks it 'sounds classical'? I'm beginning to wonder if TM is speaking an entirely different language from the rest of us (Newspeak comes to mind; if not that, it's probably Double Dutch). My question stands: what, TM, do you call classical music? |
john bodega 13.01.2009 06:35 |
I dunno guys. I think this is way better But what would I know, I'm just a mindless sheep! |
inu-liger 13.01.2009 06:38 |
Zebonka12 wrote: I dunno guys. I think this is way better But what would I know, I'm just a mindless sheep! Haha! TM clearly looks, as I said before, pretty uncomfortable there, and takes over a minute to realize his amp isn't really on, and misses the first note or two going into the chorus. Notice how he tries to hide from sight to the side, behind the stage props? |
Treasure Moment 13.01.2009 08:46 |
inu-liger wrote:Zebonka12 wrote: I dunno guys. I think this is way better But what would I know, I'm just a mindless sheep!Haha! TM clearly looks, as I said before, pretty uncomfortable there, and takes over a minute to realize his amp isn't really on, and misses the first note or two going into the chorus. Notice how he tries to hide from sight to the side, behind the stage props? the amp was on, it was just that the synth was much higher so i had to turn up the volume even more and it was a little stage so it was pretty uncomfortable. |
Treasure Moment 13.01.2009 08:47 |
ThomasQuinn wrote: TM's music creative, and not predictable? So playing arpeggios while never leaving the home key is creative and unpredictable now? And "classically influenced" because TM thinks it 'sounds classical'? I'm beginning to wonder if TM is speaking an entirely different language from the rest of us (Newspeak comes to mind; if not that, it's probably Double Dutch). My question stands: what, TM, do you call classical music? what do you think? silly question |
Treasure Moment 13.01.2009 08:49 |
inu-liger wrote:Treasure Moment wrote:Bolded for clarification: YOU think it's good music. Unfortunately, most of us don't think that way. Also, I hardly think your music is unpredictable (Why do I get the feeling you guys always think you have the newest 'Bohemian Rhapsody' every time you come up with a crap demo?) OK, certainly YOU can hear where YOUR influence comes from, but also WE don't think it's classical in the true sense of the word at all. That said, you can't go around calling your music 'classical'. That music genre belongs to the REAL people who made REAL classical music centuries ago. I'm sure they call it classical for a reason, and therefore have the music theory courses taught in academic settings. At best, 'neo-classical' would be more proper for your style. Do you honestly think you're any better than classical composers like Beethoven or Pachelbel? Until you take music theory and demonstrate a proficient knowledge of it, you're only going to get your ass laughed at continuously over and over for your grand claims. Anyways, please less classical and more ROCK.inu-liger wrote:I can HEAR if we have classical influence or not, simple as that, i dont need unnecessary music education, we go by feeling. Whatever you want to call it, we call it good music that has depth and is creative and not predictable and has emotion.Treasure Moment wrote:Your 'classical music' is about as classical as 1998 Britney Spears. Honestly, you either KNOW music theory by written and studied definition, or you don't. You obviously don't know, because you only go by a half-assed assumption that you understand it just because you only listen to classical music as a casual listener, not as a student taking the real deal (academic course) in a controlled, verifiable environment.ThomasQuinn wrote: Little boy, I compose film music; I study music theory (and the whole point about classical music is that it revolves, one way or another, about *classical theory*; that's the main difference with other styles; no other style of music demands so absolutely and strenuously that composers are familiar with theory), I study philosophy of music, I have analyzed quite a number of compositions, classical and other, and I concern myself with music in every way I can. Do not tell me that I do not know music, because you are making a fool of yourself. It is the one thing I can be absolutely sure I know more about than you. And you still haven't answered my question: what is classical music, according to you? And what is classical about *your* music?I dont know or care about music theory so i cant explain it that but i just know when i hear it. Our music has alot of classical influence and its better than anything you could ever compose, im just saying this because you constantly talk shit about us, must be cause of jealousy :D once again you are trying to change us, do i say to you "hey inu, stop playing that shit and start playing R&B" or some shit like that? we like classical music and its a big influence in this band, Queen also had a huge classical influence and that is freddies compositions. |
knakenrudi 13.01.2009 10:52 |
We still haven't seen the "performing in front of thousands of people" video, or am I missing something? Another question; what exactly is your classical influence then? You seem quite convinced that you have that style of playing, so which composers or classical eras are you particularly fond of? Is it Bach, Liszt, Couperin, Beethoven, Pachelbel or that wonderful classical inspired supergroup Europe? Because I can't hear any classical influence, just crappy '80's wannabe-interesting synthpop. |
thomasquinn 32989 13.01.2009 11:36 |
Treasure Moment wrote:ThomasQuinn wrote: TM's music creative, and not predictable? So playing arpeggios while never leaving the home key is creative and unpredictable now? And "classically influenced" because TM thinks it 'sounds classical'? I'm beginning to wonder if TM is speaking an entirely different language from the rest of us (Newspeak comes to mind; if not that, it's probably Double Dutch). My question stands: what, TM, do you call classical music?what do you think? silly question Be honest; you don't know, do you? |
Treasure Moment 13.01.2009 15:10 |
ThomasQuinn wrote:Treasure Moment wrote:Be honest; you don't know, do you?ThomasQuinn wrote: TM's music creative, and not predictable? So playing arpeggios while never leaving the home key is creative and unpredictable now? And "classically influenced" because TM thinks it 'sounds classical'? I'm beginning to wonder if TM is speaking an entirely different language from the rest of us (Newspeak comes to mind; if not that, it's probably Double Dutch). My question stands: what, TM, do you call classical music?what do you think? silly question dont be an idiot, its so obvious its embaressing that you ask, mozart, beethoven, chopin etc, stop making a big deal out of it, we have some classical influence and thats it, none of the mainstream bands can compare with tm, fact. |
knakenrudi 13.01.2009 15:39 |
Treasure Moment wrote:ThomasQuinn wrote:dont be an idiot, its so obvious its embaressing that you ask, mozart, beethoven, chopin etc, stop making a big deal out of it, we have some classical influence and thats it, none of the mainstream bands can compare with tm, fact.Treasure Moment wrote:Be honest; you don't know, do you?ThomasQuinn wrote: TM's music creative, and not predictable? So playing arpeggios while never leaving the home key is creative and unpredictable now? And "classically influenced" because TM thinks it 'sounds classical'? I'm beginning to wonder if TM is speaking an entirely different language from the rest of us (Newspeak comes to mind; if not that, it's probably Double Dutch). My question stands: what, TM, do you call classical music?what do you think? silly question Would you consider Messiaen a classical composer? |
Treasure Moment 13.01.2009 19:32 |
knakenrudi wrote:Treasure Moment wrote:Would you consider Messiaen a classical composer?ThomasQuinn wrote:dont be an idiot, its so obvious its embaressing that you ask, mozart, beethoven, chopin etc, stop making a big deal out of it, we have some classical influence and thats it, none of the mainstream bands can compare with tm, fact.Treasure Moment wrote:Be honest; you don't know, do you?ThomasQuinn wrote: TM's music creative, and not predictable? So playing arpeggios while never leaving the home key is creative and unpredictable now? And "classically influenced" because TM thinks it 'sounds classical'? I'm beginning to wonder if TM is speaking an entirely different language from the rest of us (Newspeak comes to mind; if not that, it's probably Double Dutch). My question stands: what, TM, do you call classical music?what do you think? silly question i checked out 1 "song" and no it didnt sound like classical music, if its considered classical then its a very weird sub genre of it. |
thomasquinn 32989 14.01.2009 12:47 |
Hahahaha! And you talk about *feeling* in your music? Olivier Messiaen was a French classical composer just before WWII. He fought the Germans and was caught after war broke out; while he was in a German P.O.W. camp he composed "Quatuor pour la fin du temps" (Quartet For the End of Times) for the musicians present in that camp. If that music lacks feeling and/or emotion according to you, you are officially a moron. Have a listen over here. |
thomasquinn 32989 14.01.2009 12:48 |
Oh, and "song" refers to a piece of music that is short, based around a short poem or lyric, composed for solo voice and (vocal or instrumental) accompaniment. |
knakenrudi 14.01.2009 13:17 |
Agree totally with TQ. Mr. moment, if you consider your predictable series of arpeggios to be groundbreaking, let your keyboardbrother have a go at a piece like "Apparition de l'eglise eternelle' by Messiaen (which I'm studying at this moment), classical music or not. Could be an eye-opener, although I consider this music to be art that goes above your head and intellect. |
Treasure Moment 14.01.2009 16:30 |
knakenrudi wrote: Agree totally with TQ. Mr. moment, if you consider your predictable series of arpeggios to be groundbreaking, let your keyboardbrother have a go at a piece like "Apparition de l'eglise eternelle' by Messiaen (which I'm studying at this moment), classical music or not. Could be an eye-opener, although I consider this music to be art that goes above your head and intellect. my brother is about 1 million times better than messiaen when it comes to to composing good catchy emotional deep music, FACT. That messiaen guy is good at writing the most uncatchy most emotionless garbage possible, random uncatchy stuff is so good................. |
inu-liger 15.01.2009 01:12 |
Treasure Moment wrote:knakenrudi wrote: Agree totally with TQ. Mr. moment, if you consider your predictable series of arpeggios to be groundbreaking, let your keyboardbrother have a go at a piece like "Apparition de l'eglise eternelle' by Messiaen (which I'm studying at this moment), classical music or not. Could be an eye-opener, although I consider this music to be art that goes above your head and intellect.my brother is about 1 million times better than messiaen when it comes to to composing good catchy emotional deep music, FACT. That messiaen guy is good at writing the most uncatchy most emotionless garbage possible, random uncatchy stuff is so good................. You officially deserve to be packed in a box with enriched uranium marked 'Return to Sender' en route to Iran. |
Treasure Moment 15.01.2009 05:29 |
inu-liger wrote:Treasure Moment wrote:You officially deserve to be packed in a box with enriched uranium marked 'Return to Sender' en route to Iran.knakenrudi wrote: Agree totally with TQ. Mr. moment, if you consider your predictable series of arpeggios to be groundbreaking, let your keyboardbrother have a go at a piece like "Apparition de l'eglise eternelle' by Messiaen (which I'm studying at this moment), classical music or not. Could be an eye-opener, although I consider this music to be art that goes above your head and intellect.my brother is about 1 million times better than messiaen when it comes to to composing good catchy emotional deep music, FACT. That messiaen guy is good at writing the most uncatchy most emotionless garbage possible, random uncatchy stuff is so good................. just telling facts. |
inu-liger 15.01.2009 05:51 |
Treasure Moment wrote:inu-liger wrote:just telling facts.Treasure Moment wrote:You officially deserve to be packed in a box with enriched uranium marked 'Return to Sender' en route to Iran.knakenrudi wrote: Agree totally with TQ. Mr. moment, if you consider your predictable series of arpeggios to be groundbreaking, let your keyboardbrother have a go at a piece like "Apparition de l'eglise eternelle' by Messiaen (which I'm studying at this moment), classical music or not. Could be an eye-opener, although I consider this music to be art that goes above your head and intellect.my brother is about 1 million times better than messiaen when it comes to to composing good catchy emotional deep music, FACT. That messiaen guy is good at writing the most uncatchy most emotionless garbage possible, random uncatchy stuff is so good................. Is having gay sex with your brother also a fact of life? |
thomasquinn 32989 15.01.2009 13:17 |
I'm just happy that the chances of him ever reproducing are so limited. |
Treasure Moment 15.01.2009 13:48 |
inu-liger wrote:Treasure Moment wrote:Is having gay sex with your brother also a fact of life?inu-liger wrote:just telling facts.Treasure Moment wrote:You officially deserve to be packed in a box with enriched uranium marked 'Return to Sender' en route to Iran.knakenrudi wrote: Agree totally with TQ. Mr. moment, if you consider your predictable series of arpeggios to be groundbreaking, let your keyboardbrother have a go at a piece like "Apparition de l'eglise eternelle' by Messiaen (which I'm studying at this moment), classical music or not. Could be an eye-opener, although I consider this music to be art that goes above your head and intellect.my brother is about 1 million times better than messiaen when it comes to to composing good catchy emotional deep music, FACT. That messiaen guy is good at writing the most uncatchy most emotionless garbage possible, random uncatchy stuff is so good................. well what about when you and your father have sex each night? isnt that also a fact? |
Treasure Moment 15.01.2009 13:49 |
ThomasQuinn wrote: I'm just happy that the chances of him ever reproducing are so limited. as i said, you are one extremely stupid creature. |
thomasquinn 32989 15.01.2009 13:50 |
Wow. That was almost as original as a "your momma"-joke. Also note that he never denies the accusations of gay incestuous sex. |
Treasure Moment 15.01.2009 14:18 |
ThomasQuinn wrote: Wow. That was almost as original as a "your momma"-joke. Also note that he never denies the accusations of gay incestuous sex. yes, im gay like you mr thomas "i know shit about music" :D |
thomasquinn 32989 16.01.2009 06:34 |
Yeah, I'm as gay as a daffodil, and incidentally also as straight as a line. |
inu-liger 16.01.2009 06:57 |
ThomasQuinn wrote: Also note that he never denies the accusations of gay incestuous sex. Indeed. Maybe that's why their music is so gay. They inces......er, insist on making it as close to Freddie's 'classical' style, but they couldn't figure it out (and still can't) how to do so, and in the process decided to have gay sex to be one step more like their hero, to see if they could (unsuccessfully) unlock the secret, instead giving each other AIDS in the process. You lose one, you gain one I guess :-/ |
inu-liger 16.01.2009 06:58 |
ThomasQuinn wrote: Yeah, I'm as gay as a daffodil, and incidentally also as straight as a line. Are you as round as a ball? Or square like a...............square? (You know they say it's 'hip to be square' [img=/images/smiley/msn/wink_smile.gif][/img]) |
thomasquinn 32989 16.01.2009 07:08 |
inu-liger wrote:ThomasQuinn wrote: Also note that he never denies the accusations of gay incestuous sex.Indeed. Maybe that's why their music is so gay. They inces......er, insist on making it as close to Freddie's 'classical' style, but they couldn't figure it out (and still can't) how to do so, and in the process decided to have gay sex to be one step more like their hero, to see if they could (unsuccessfully) unlock the secret, instead giving each other AIDS in the process. You lose one, you gain one I guess :-/ Well...if they infected each other (I won't go into the philosophical and medical difficulties of that feat), I'd say THEY lose one, WE gain one. |
thomasquinn 32989 16.01.2009 07:09 |
inu-liger wrote:ThomasQuinn wrote: Yeah, I'm as gay as a daffodil, and incidentally also as straight as a line.Are you as round as a ball? Or square like a...............square? (You know they say it's 'hip to be square' [img=/images/smiley/msn/wink_smile.gif][/img]) I'm anthropomorphic. I doubt I have the capacities required to translate that into geometric shapes. |