Benn 05.10.2005 07:46 |
Anyone else finding it strange that there has been no press release for this? We know that Springsteen's Born To Run has been pre-empted by an official announcement, so, why have Parlophone not announced anything? Could it be that they are so enraged by the limited scope that they have almost turned their backs on it? |
Negative Creep 05.10.2005 08:18 |
Perhaps because it isn't worthy of any press? The content is embarrasing & isn't likely to sell too well. It will be overshadowed by the 30th anniversary releases by Elton John & Springsteen. |
Fenderek 05.10.2005 08:26 |
I honestly think they're embarassing themselves with this release... |
john bodega 05.10.2005 08:30 |
Really? What are they doing, something poxy? |
innuendopt 05.10.2005 08:30 |
Even Pink Floyd have already announced their Pulse DVD for 5th December (Yes it's true!!!), but nothing from QP yet... |
Negative Creep 05.10.2005 08:34 |
I think if people HAVE to have this re-issue... they should buy it either from an online retailer who's sales don't contribute to the charts, or leave it until the following week.... that might teach them. |
Ray D O'Gaga 05.10.2005 09:55 |
I'm sorry but I have obviously missed the outrage over this release. Anyone care to briefly outline where the hate comes from? I assume because it isn't going to include outtakes from the vault but instead will have a DVD full of previously released videos and clip-fests? Or is there more to it than that? |
Fenderek 05.10.2005 09:59 |
Ray D O'Gaga wrote: I assume because it isn't going to include outtakes from the vault but instead will have a DVD full of previously released videos and clip-fests?Pretty much it, yes. Or maybe more- when you look at other bands and see their releases like that... You can only feel jealous... Another missed opportunity. Cause not only we're going to see same pictures lip synced to the album- we'll laso see some 50s seaside footage- I mean- WOOW! :) |
Ray D O'Gaga 05.10.2005 10:05 |
Fenderek wrote:Thanks for clearing that up for me :)Ray D O'Gaga wrote: I assume because it isn't going to include outtakes from the vault but instead will have a DVD full of previously released videos and clip-fests?Pretty much it, yes. Or maybe more- when you look at other bands and see their releases like that... You can only feel jealous... Another missed opportunity. Cause not only we're going to see same pictures lip synced to the album- we'll laso see some 50s seaside footage- I mean- WOOW! :) |
Adam Baboolal 05.10.2005 10:31 |
As it's getting more and more closer to the 30th release, I'm getting more and more bemused by this. When Brian says he's gonna do something special, he usually isn't kidding. Yet, the details that online shops have up, doesn't sound like Brian's usual treats. I mean, when he's talked about the surround releases and how they're special, he's not wrong. And when I saw his postings about filming some stuff for the 30th release, I didn't see it as being a mere drop-in during a song on playback. I still think this sounds weird. But as time draws nearer and there's no word from either Brian or any other official camp, I'm starting to wonder if the shops have it right. But, good or bad, I'll still "wait and see." Peace, Adam. |
Mr Mercury 05.10.2005 10:51 |
innuendopt wrote: Even Pink Floyd have already announced their Pulse DVD for 5th December (Yes it's true!!!), but nothing from QP yet...As regards the Floyd DVD, I find it strange that the concert itself is gonna be split into 2 parts with the first on disc one and the second on disc two. Whats the point of that? Heres the full product details:- Title - Pulse Release Date - 5 December 2005 Running Time - Over 3 hours Technical Details - Speaker ID, Pink Noise inc 'Audio Setup' Dolby Digital 5.1 448 kbps, Dolby Digital 5.1 640 kbps. Stereo Tracklisting Disc 1 Concert Part 1: - Shine On - Learning To Fly - High Hopes - Take It Back - Coming Back To Life - Sorrow - Keep Talking - Another Brick In The Wall Pt 2 - One of These Days Screen Films: - Shine On - High Hopes - Learning to Fly Bootlegging the Bootleggers: - What Do You Want From Me - On The Turning Way - Poles Apart - Marooned Shorts: - Time (Eames) - Money (Alien) - Speak To Me 1987 - Pulse TV Advert Videos: - Learning To Fly - Take It Back Tracklisting Disc 2 Concert Part 2: - Speak To Me - Breathe - On The Run - Time - The Great Gig In The Sky - Money - Us And Them - Brain Damage - Eclipse - Wish You Were Here - Comfortably Numb - Run Like Hell Screen Films: - Speak To Me (graphic) - On The Run - Time 1994 - The Great Gig in the Sky (wave) - Money - Us And Them 1987 - Brain Damage - Eclipse Alternate Screen Films: - The Great Gig In The Sky (animation) - Us And Them 1994 Behind the Scenes Footage: - Goodbye to Life As We Know It Wish You Were Here: - Rock and Roll Hall of Fame Induction Ceremony Photo Gallery |
Lester Burnham 05.10.2005 11:59 |
I know I haven't posted here in a while, but I sent Brian an email about the "planned" 30th anniversary release and haven't yet gotten a response. I think if enough people are outraged and would care to vent as such to Brian himself... well, I doubt all that much will change. I guess we should accept the fact that Queen are about to release a shoddy product, and we can either succumb to the pressure and purchase it or teach them a lesson and not buy it; either way, I think it's going to be a drop in the ocean, and make very little effect either way. Then again, I'm still hoping that whatever was sent to online shops is just a bit of a joke thing created by Queen Productions and that the real thing will blow our asses into the water, but, considering some of the conventioneers saw the actual product, my hopes of that happening disintegrate more and more each day. Also, I'm really excited about that Pulse DVD - the reason they split it into two parts? Probably the same reason they split the regular concert and the Dark Side Of The Moon segment apart. |
Lester Burnham 05.10.2005 12:37 |
Perhaps we didn't mention how much we liked the musical or the Queen + Paul Rodgers tour. That's an almost guaranteed response right there. |
Boy Thomas Raker 05.10.2005 14:10 |
I've found Brian to treat his Soapbox as a positive thing (fans saying "I love the musical, tour, Pepsi commercial" etc.) unless he's outraged. Remember the hoopla over the supposed backing tape for Fat Bottomed Girls? Brian "heard" how people were commenting on it after the 46664 concert. He posted on his Soapbox that the band must sound pretty good if people think tapes were being used. So he heard of that (from this board probably), but he didn't hear about the use of backing tapes for Ga Ga or TATDOOL? I find that impossible. Or selective reading. So for the record, there are no backing tapes used for FBG because Brian said so. There are also no backing tapes used in Ga Ga or TATDOOL because the question about backing tapes doesn't exist. And the musical is brilliant because it sells tickets, and the ridiculous storyline is wonderful because people stand and cheer. And the ANATO 30th Anniversary edition will be fantastic and if you don't like it you're wrong. |
Haystacks Calhoun 05.10.2005 15:21 |
BHM 0271 wrote: I've found Brian to treat his Soapbox as a positive thing (fans saying "I love the musical, tour, Pepsi commercial" etc.) unless he's outraged. Remember the hoopla over the supposed backing tape for Fat Bottomed Girls? Brian "heard" how people were commenting on it after the 46664 concert. He posted on his Soapbox that the band must sound pretty good if people think tapes were being used. So he heard of that (from this board probably), but he didn't hear about the use of backing tapes for Ga Ga or TATDOOL? I find that impossible. Or selective reading. So for the record, there are no backing tapes used for FBG because Brian said so. There are also no backing tapes used in Ga Ga or TATDOOL because the question about backing tapes doesn't exist. And the musical is brilliant because it sells tickets, and the ridiculous storyline is wonderful because people stand and cheer. And the ANATO 30th Anniversary edition will be fantastic and if you don't like it you're wrong.Sounds like Brian should work for the Bush administration. |
innuendopt 05.10.2005 16:05 |
Well, after all this MEGA PF news (and the Bruce Springsteen's Born To Run package looks great too), IF that description of ANATO we've been told is true, I have to agree that QP are really falling in shame... And I have another example: see the Oasis' Definitely Maybe 2004 re-issue. It has got live performances for ALL the songs, promos when available and a documentary about the album! Anyway, I'm really excited about PULSE, it has completely shadowed my enthusiasm for the ANATO re-re-re-release.. |
Hank H. 05.10.2005 17:40 |
Haystacks Calhoun wrote:Yes, and the cover for ROTC (by the way, what a great innovative titel) is so unbelievably fantastic and far ahead of its time that the contemporaries are not yet capable to get the brilliance. We are not worthy of something that great, only Brian May appreciates it. Normally we should pay an extra prize only for the cover artwork.BHM 0271 wrote: I've found Brian to treat his Soapbox as a positive thing (fans saying "I love the musical, tour, Pepsi commercial" etc.) unless he's outraged. Remember the hoopla over the supposed backing tape for Fat Bottomed Girls? Brian "heard" how people were commenting on it after the 46664 concert. He posted on his Soapbox that the band must sound pretty good if people think tapes were being used. So he heard of that (from this board probably), but he didn't hear about the use of backing tapes for Ga Ga or TATDOOL? I find that impossible. Or selective reading. So for the record, there are no backing tapes used for FBG because Brian said so. There are also no backing tapes used in Ga Ga or TATDOOL because the question about backing tapes doesn't exist. And the musical is brilliant because it sells tickets, and the ridiculous storyline is wonderful because people stand and cheer. And the ANATO 30th Anniversary edition will be fantastic and if you don't like it you're wrong.Sounds like Brian should work for the Bush administration. |
JDL2nd 05.10.2005 18:30 |
come on guys. Don't be that negative. Just wait and see what we'll get. There is no real good total reliable information about this dvd so far , so just wait and judge when you see it. I think all the dvd's so far were VERY GOOD. So far Queen doesn't have any bad dvd. So just wait...wait...wait...wait till the 30th anniversary of ANATO. |
My Melancholy Blues 05.10.2005 20:03 |
I also think it's strange that there's been no press release about it, though I heard the news from Japanese Queen official web site...QP is too humble for it??? Anyway just wait. |
Boy Thomas Raker 05.10.2005 21:33 |
JDL, there's a thing called track record. Queen's track record for the better part of 15 years (the Hollywood track errors, bad artwork, terrible promotion, product that is released solely for profit, Pink, Robbie Williams, 5ive, countless WWRY tracks, the Pepsi fiasco, quality issues with all DVD's) is brutal, and shows that people like you are the people Queen are targeting. They don't deserve the benefit of the doubt, they're in the business of separating people's dollars from their wallets, quality be damned. If you want to pay for shit, knock yourself out. A lot of us expect the worst now from QP, and are seldom disappointed. |
TarHeelDDS2005 05.10.2005 21:52 |
When is this ANATO dvd coming out in the USA? I never hear anything about it. |
john bodega 06.10.2005 00:33 |
Is there a feature list for this thing anywhere? I'd find it myself but I'm about to go out. |
The Real Wizard 06.10.2005 00:48 |
Both the Wembley and Bowl DVDs were fantastic, and honestly, I have a slight feeling that this one will be just as good. Yes, the songs will have crappy videos, but I think there is going to be a fantastic disc 2. Hammersmith 75 footage and studio demos? Oh yeah, that reminds me... whatever happened to all the studio albums being re-released as 2 discs - the second discs consisting purely of demos? |
Maz 06.10.2005 00:52 |
They're due out right after the BBC sessions. |
Ray D O'Gaga 06.10.2005 03:06 |
Zeni wrote: As God as my witness, I thought turkeys could fly.God bless Arthur Carlson, Herb Tarlick and Les Nessman. |
Fenderek 06.10.2005 05:17 |
Apparently Box Sets are on the cards again in 2009... So said Greg, so said Jim Beach, so said (apparently) E.M.I... So i think 2CD releases were either abandoned or never intended to be out. And I really wouldn't count in Hammy'75 on the second disc... That would have been HUGE surprise, but... nah, after all those years I'm really expecting the worst... |
Benn 06.10.2005 05:59 |
Lester - good to hear from you again mate! Brian doesn't respond to anything that he doesn't get to see - I believe that Jen ONLY allows positive material / comment to reach Brian for his opinion. What he doesn't know won't hurt him and all that. Brian's no Pete Townshend; he's a great musician but certainly no genius - Pete (as a genius) is more able to take criticism and negativity on board - he deals with it in a very constructive way: Member of the audience - "Get on with it!"; Pete - "Fuck off - it's my show!", whereas Brian (as a great guitarist) has no idea of how to deal with it - you only have to go back to some of his more embarassing rants on the Soapbox as an illustration and that can only be because "someone" isn't exposing him to it. I seem to remember somewhere that Brian was always happy to sign / be photographed by fans as he believed that it was they who got him to the position that he is in today - all of a sudden, he's publicly berating those same people for doing just that. In one way, it's a good thing - Brian can concentrate on what it important AT THE MOMENT - ie taking Q+PR forward into 2006 and extended studio work. I honestly believe that they could create an absolutely top notch album that would be fitting as a showcase for all of their talents - Danny Miranda especially IMO. If this is a way to facilitate that creative spark, then I'm all for it. However, what Brian then fails to be able to grasp is that there is a MASSIVE upswelling of negativity towards the history of the band AS A DIRECT RESULT of the decision making that has lead to the abandonment of the originally planned 2 x CD sets for this shoddily concepted 30th Anniversary release. Look at the material that is being put out by artists such as The Who, Springsteen, Cream, Joplin, Gaye, Kinks, Marley, Frampton et al. The addition of live material or expanded outtakes and alternate versions serve to place the original (in a remastered or re-mixed form) in a fuller context as well as enabling the record company to place the original album back in the shops and attract a potential new generation of listeners that have not been exposed to it before. I honestly don't believe that ANATO released in the format we have been forewarned about will sell more than a few thousand copies - hence the lack of marketing / publicity. It's just not worth EMI's time, just as it's not worth £15 of anyone's hard-earned. |
john bodega 06.10.2005 09:35 |
That is a masterful post Benn. |
Boy Thomas Raker 06.10.2005 09:51 |
Excellent post Benn, however, to say that "Brian's no Pete Townshend; he's a great musician but certainly no genius" is not right. Brian is a musical genius. If you don't think that Good Company is genius, or the solo on Bo Rhap, or the orchestrations on GSTQ, to name but 3 examples, I don't know what genius is. |
Lester Burnham 06.10.2005 09:52 |
Personally, I don't think Brian should have ever started his soapbox - "if you can't take the heat, step out of the kitchen". He more or less set himself up for more direct communication, and I don't think he was prepared for it. Now, instead of everything being directed through Queen Productions, he gets it (almost) straight from the horse's mouth, meaning he's susceptible to every kind of fan question, demand, request, rant, etc. that can be directed his way. It's really a shame, because he sounds like a very nice guy, but to believe that you would get very nice things all the time is just absurd. His rants on public smoking I can see, even though I don't agree with them; his rants on war shouldn't have been posted, even though I agree with them; his little problem with orbs was just... well, I won't go there; but his passion for the music is what I want to read. People asking him interesting things about the music or what's coming up or whatever is the bread and butter of Brian's site. I think he goes into overkill mode every now and then, and if he responded to every single criticism that a journalist out there has to say, then I get the feeling that everyone would stop reading what he had to say. You can't please everyone all the time, and negative criticism will still be out there, so why try to fight it? And I WANT to believe that this 30th anniversary will be something special, but honestly... a DVD of music videos? I'm sorry, but if that's the only bonus they can think up, then I won't need to worry about giving up $25 of my cash for this. I suppose the sad thing is that people expect a lot more in terms of re-releases now - a bonus disc crammed with a whole lot of goodies, or an extra DVD of a live show. Maybe a liner booklet of previously unpublished photos with a lengthy essay by the musicians himself or a specialized historian. Unfortunately, I don't believe that will be the case here. I haven't seen any rumblings of a second CD, just a bonus DVD. However, if there does happen to be a second CD, then I might reconsider this package. It's just what I've come to expect of reissues, whether they're by Costello, Cream, Yes, The Who, or Pavement, for crying out loud. Give the people what they want? Only as long as it's cost-effective for Queen Productions and EMI, I suppose. |
mike hunt 06.10.2005 09:54 |
are you trying to sound smart again, poor lester. once a loser always a loser. |
Benn 06.10.2005 10:22 |
BHM - re: Brian is a musical genius..... I never said anything about music specifically - Brian's exploitation of technology is in no way different to Townshend's use of synthesisers on "Won't Get Fooled Again" or "Baba O'Riley"; in the same way that is no different to anything that anyone did before him. Pete's genius is as a person and the vision of the future he had at the back end of 1970. Brian limits himself to what is there already. Mike - re: poor lester..... What got up your ass? Your head? Lester - re: Brian's posts..... Brian simply didn't understand the power of communication. Regular, run of the mill punters like us who suddenly get this legendary rock star in real-time, saying "I love you all" and "I hate war - let's have peace" etc etc just suck all of it in and believe that the legendary rock star in his or her mansion really does want to have interaction. If that was the case, there would be no need for security at concerts. Brian loves us all, but you can't take a very quick snap of him on your mobile phone camera. Oh, yeah and the other one that really got me was when he was at The Oval watching the cricket and he felt "invaded" after Channel 4's cameras lingered on him. Then he goes on to say how big a fan he has "always" been of cricket and this from the guy that thought London's bid for the Olympics was a complete waste of resources and that sport shouldn't be a priority. The guy hasn't got a clue. He never did respond to my question as to what his response would be if he was invited to compose and record the Olympic theme for 2012 - a buddy of mine works for the BOA.......might just have to sow the seeds of a proposal..... Ha ha! As for the re-issue, I guess we won't know for certain until we get to see the packaging - that's not likely to be until 5/11 as there's no press release. I'll have a look at it and make my decision based on that - it's a lost opportunity and will be absolutely ripped apart by influential magazines such as Mojo and Record Collector. Potentially very damaging. |
Lester Burnham 06.10.2005 10:41 |
Pete and Brian are in different leagues to each other. Yes, Brian's an innovator guitarist, using techniques on a homemade instrument that still sounds amazing after all these years, while Townshend is "merely" a rhythm guitarist. But Brian didn't write 90% of Queen's material, including two rock operas as well as a third abandoned one, in addition to severely personal songs about alcoholism, sexual frustration, and irritation with the music industry in general. In my book, while Brian's a damn fine guitarist who wrote a few good songs, Pete's a lyrical and musical genius who plays a few good guitar licks. Of course, that's deliberate understatement, but still. Imagine if Pete were in Brian's situation in terms of a soapbox. Yeah, he does in effect have one, but what he writes and what Brian writes are way different. I can't imagine Pete answering to personal emails; I just don't think he has the patience for that. Brian's a naturally nice person, who always wants to please the fans, but gets frustrated when the fans ask too much of him. Pete, however, just posts very interesting, sometimes entertaining updates on his life, which I look forward to more than I do Brian's updates. I realize they call it "Brian's Soapbox" for a reason, but if Brian didn't want all that negative criticism, he would have changed the format so many years ago. |
Q-Nick 06.10.2005 11:33 |
Negative Creep wrote: It will be overshadowed by the 30th anniversary releases by Elton John & Springsteen.The Contents of the Springsteen BTR Boxset show how much Queen Produtions have got to raise their game. |
Adam Baboolal 06.10.2005 11:53 |
Benn wrote: ...and believe that the legendary rock star in his or her mansion really does want to have interaction. If that was the case, there would be no need for security at concerts.I could forget most of the drivel in this thread about Brian, but this comment on security?? The real reason for security is dangerous situations and overbearing fans. Otherwise, Brian IS most kind and willing to meet people. I still remember my family's chance encounter with him and there was a fairly big group of people waiting for him near WWRY's stage door. He was most kind and chatty. Security let him do his thing. Benn wrote: Oh, yeah and the other one that really got me was when he was at The Oval watching the cricket and he felt 'invaded' after Channel 4's cameras lingered on him.Do you realise how annoying it is to have a camera trained on you? I can tell you, it IS bloody annoying. I'd go as far to say that I feel like I'm being put on the spot and I'm supposed to do something/perform or whatever. You only have to understand what Brian is talking about to really appreciate why he feels the way he does. I'm a nobody and I really dislike it sometimes. Benn wrote: He never did respond to my question as to what his response would be if he was invited to compose and record the Olympic theme for 2012 - a buddy of mine works for the BOA.......might just have to sow the seeds of a proposal..... Ha ha!Ah... I assume that you think if he'd accepted it, that'd make him a hipocrite. Sorry, but if he did, that doesn't make him anything other than a person interested in helping out. The olympics are now on course, so why would he cry over spilt milk. And as it has been said before, if you really dislike Brian's soapbox, why read it? If there's something important that we Queen fans should know, there'll be someone posting it here within hours of it popping up. Unless of course, you like to sit and bitch about all this stuff. Then I would understand the attraction of going there. Peace, Adam. |
bohemian 11513 06.10.2005 13:30 |
"Whatever you do... do it with style"!!! Remember what your mate once told you Mr.May and Mr.Taylor... ;-) |
Saint Jiub 07.10.2005 01:36 |
Great Posts, Benn & Lester. I agree with virtually everthing Lester said, and I agree with the Majority of what Benn said. IMHO, some of what Benn stated is too harsh or overly simplified (Although I can imagine myself making similar "inappropriate" comments). |
NOTWMEDDLE 07.10.2005 17:43 |
Benn wrote: Lester - good to hear from you again mate! Brian doesn't respond to anything that he doesn't get to see - I believe that Jen ONLY allows positive material / comment to reach Brian for his opinion. What he doesn't know won't hurt him and all that. Brian's no Pete Townshend; he's a great musician but certainly no genius - Pete (as a genius) is more able to take criticism and negativity on board - he deals with it in a very constructive way: Member of the audience - "Get on with it!"; Pete - "Fuck off - it's my show!", whereas Brian (as a great guitarist) has no idea of how to deal with it - you only have to go back to some of his more embarassing rants on the Soapbox as an illustration and that can only be because "someone" isn't exposing him to it. I seem to remember somewhere that Brian was always happy to sign / be photographed by fans as he believed that it was they who got him to the position that he is in today - all of a sudden, he's publicly berating those same people for doing just that. In one way, it's a good thing - Brian can concentrate on what it important AT THE MOMENT - ie taking Q+PR forward into 2006 and extended studio work. I honestly believe that they could create an absolutely top notch album that would be fitting as a showcase for all of their talents - Danny Miranda especially IMO. If this is a way to facilitate that creative spark, then I'm all for it. However, what Brian then fails to be able to grasp is that there is a MASSIVE upswelling of negativity towards the history of the band AS A DIRECT RESULT of the decision making that has lead to the abandonment of the originally planned 2 x CD sets for this shoddily concepted 30th Anniversary release. Look at the material that is being put out by artists such as The Who, Springsteen, Cream, Joplin, Gaye, Kinks, Marley, Frampton et al. The addition of live material or expanded outtakes and alternate versions serve to place the original (in a remastered or re-mixed form) in a fuller context as well as enabling the record company to place the original album back in the shops and attract a potential new generation of listeners that have not been exposed to it before. I honestly don't believe that ANATO released in the format we have been forewarned about will sell more than a few thousand copies - hence the lack of marketing / publicity. It's just not worth EMI's time, just as it's not worth £15 of anyone's hard-earned.EMI being villians is a joke. Jethro Tull's back catalog was re-issued by EMI/Capitol with no problems as EMI/Capitol owns Chrysalis. Most of Tull's albums contained bonus tracks and the reissue of 1980's album A featured the DVD of the long out of print video Slipstream. Also, Grand Funk Railroad's Capitol/EMI catalog was re-issued with each album getting extra songs and so forth. Pink Floyd have little in the vault for extras when they re-issue their albums. Genesis released most of their lost recordings on two box sets. Sony/BMG is a joke of a label now. The Who's back catalog re-release got the royal treatment save Tommy and Quadrophenia in the mid-1990s. Then Tommy, Live at Leeds and Who's Next were re-issued again with bonus CDs of extra material with Tommy being a Hybrid SACD. |
NOTWMEDDLE 07.10.2005 17:47 |
innuendopt wrote: Well, after all this MEGA PF news (and the Bruce Springsteen's Born To Run package looks great too), IF that description of ANATO we've been told is true, I have to agree that QP are really falling in shame... And I have another example: see the Oasis' Definitely Maybe 2004 re-issue. It has got live performances for ALL the songs, promos when available and a documentary about the album! Anyway, I'm really excited about PULSE, it has completely shadowed my enthusiasm for the ANATO re-re-re-release..Pulse's DVD release forgot the track Any Colour You Like. I think the CD counterpart of Pulse will be re-issued as well with a third CD consisting of One of These Days, Take it Back, Poles Apart, Lost For Words, On the Turning Away and the ambient soundscape noise which was on the cassette version of Pulse. The WYWH Hybrid SACD is due around the same time. |
innuendopt 09.10.2005 16:14 |
NOTWMEDDLE wrote:Pulse's DVD release forgot the track Any Colour You Like. I think the CD counterpart of Pulse will be re-issued as well with a third CD consisting of One of These Days, Take it Back, Poles Apart, Lost For Words, On the Turning Away and the ambient soundscape noise which was on the cassette version of Pulse. The WYWH Hybrid SACD is due around the same time.Well, let's see if the CD is being re-released, though I doubt about it. I would appreciate it as I missed the twinkling light edition 10 years ago.. =) |