| Serry... 25.03.2005 17:40 |
Maybe somebody is interested in business side of Queen works so here a little part of it is. All Queen Ltds Queen's: Queen Films Ltd (previously QM Productions Ltd) Queen Music Ltd Queen Online Ltd (previously Queen Multimedia Ltd) Mountain Studios Ltd (previously Rainbeat Productions Ltd) Queen Productions Ltd Queen Theatrical Productions Ltd Raincloud Productions Ltd Rushing Waters Productions Ltd Brian's: Duck Productions Ltd Flakward Ltd Turnhouse Produtions Ltd Roger's: Nightjar Productions Ltd Smashing Records Ltd Lochquest Ltd Freddie's: Goose Productions Ltd (previously Mercury Songs Ltd) Mercury Songs Ltd (previously Pond Productions Ltd) Mightytape Ltd John's: Goldfinch Productions Ltd Brian's and Roger's: Tonleigh Ltd We Will Rock You Ltd We Will Rock You (Overseas) Ltd More details, directors' names and comments are on link Special thanks to Ed (Spud)! |
| flash00. 15.04.2005 20:55 |
yea thats interesting,, they must be rolling in cash,:) |
| djaef 15.04.2005 21:29 |
flash00. wrote: yea thats interesting,, they must be rolling in cash,:)yes, I think you can safely assume that. But I would think there are a few accountants and lawyers who are not doing too badly out of this Queen enterprise as well. :) |
| Serry... 05.05.2005 09:04 |
This guy works as a director in Goose Productions and one of the directors in Mercury Songs Ltd: link Take a look where he was born... Maybe that's why he works with Freddie's companies? :) |
| doremi 05.05.2005 13:48 |
Serry Funster wrote: This guy works as a director in Goose Productions and one of the directors in Mercury Songs Ltd: link Take a look where he was born... Maybe that's why he works with Freddie's companies? :)Sergey, I remember when you told me that Amin Saleh is the man who had taken over as Director for Freddie's music publishing company. His background (being from Tanzania) makes perfect sense. Wonder if he knows the Bulsara family, especially since Freddie's Father was an accountant I believe. |
| Serry... 05.05.2005 15:40 |
Maybe he's a family lawyer or someone like that... Perhaps... |
| doremi 05.05.2005 15:51 |
Serry Funster wrote: Maybe he's a family lawyer or someone like that... Perhaps...Look at the info link you posted. He started out in accounting for a big firm handling the accounts of music & entertainment artists, but he arrived in the UK 1969. I'm pretty sure Freddie's DAD Bomi was an accountant too, and Freddie's family moved to the UK just a few years prior. I bet Freddie's Dad may have known him due to their being in the same profession and both being from Tanzania. |
| Serry... 05.05.2005 16:39 |
Everything is possible under the sun... Your guess seems very close to the truth, IMO. |
| TRS-Romania 19.06.2006 09:24 |
Serry... wrote: Maybe somebody is interested in business side of Queen works so here a little part of it is. All Queen Ltds Queen's: Queen Films Ltd (previously QM Productions Ltd) Queen Music Ltd Queen Online Ltd (previously Queen Multimedia Ltd) Mountain Studios Ltd (previously Rainbeat Productions Ltd) Queen Productions Ltd Queen Theatrical Productions Ltd Raincloud Productions Ltd Rushing Waters Productions Ltd Brian's: Duck Productions Ltd Flakward Ltd Turnhouse Produtions Ltd Roger's: Nightjar Productions Ltd Smashing Records Ltd Lochquest Ltd Freddie's: Goose Productions Ltd (previously Mercury Songs Ltd) Mercury Songs Ltd (previously Pond Productions Ltd) Mightytape Ltd John's: Goldfinch Productions Ltd Brian's and Roger's: Tonleigh Ltd We Will Rock You Ltd We Will Rock You (Overseas) Ltd More details, directors' names and comments are on link Special thanks to Ed (Spud)!OH NO! John is still active with his Production company and started a new band in Barnet, London? "These days Barnet is a mix of many cultures with large Asian and African populations as well as the UK's largest Jewish community. The borough has a Conservative-dominated council, and is home to over 300,000 people, two thirds of whom are home-owners." link Welcome to the Barnet bands section of London Directory. Below, we have provided a list of useful Barnet local bands, rock bands and local music scene Web sites and related pages. Goldfinch Productions Ltd. The Mill Mill Lane Cookham , Maidenhead, SL6 9QT Tel: 01628-527874 link What is the chance of having a company in London with the same name as John Deacon's company (I thought that was not allowed), and active in the music business? Or can we just assume that maybe John's kids are involved here? ;-) Deacy jr! ;-) Stefan |
| Togg 19.06.2006 09:37 |
No it's Deaky's company, he had some business interests in a studio at one time, however I don't think he has much to do with it these days. |
| TRS-Romania 19.06.2006 09:38 |
Well ... i kind of looked further because I was bored ... RAINCLOUD PRODUCTIONS LIMITED Registered No. 01349012 FIRST FLOOR, GREEN GARDEN HOUSE, 15-22 ST CHRISTOPHERS PLACE, LONDON, W1M 5HE QUEEN FILMS LIMITED Registered No. 02674407 FIRST FLOOR, GREEN GARDEN HOUSE, 15-22 ST CHRISTOPHERS PLACE, LONDON, W1M 5HE (Greengarden House is located in St Christopher's Place, a fashionable pedestrianised street lined with exclusive shops and cosmopolitan restaurants.link How come Raincloud Productions is there as well as Queen films Limited (is it a new "headquarter" ?) Roger's company: SMASHING RECORDS LIMITED Registered No. 03061922 22 COTTAGE OFFICES LATIMER PARK, LATIMER ROAD, CHESHAM, BUCKINGHAMSHIRE, HP5 1TU Lochquest Ltd Registered No. 03034656 22 COTTAGE OFFICES LATIMER PARK, LOATIMER ROAD, CHESHAM, BUCKINGHAMSHIRE, HP5 1TU although in the search result on Google it said: LOCHQUEST LIMITED Registered No. 03034656 THE MILL,MILL LANE,COOKHAM,BERKSHIRE,SL6 9QT Company Name: LOCHQUEST LIMITED Company No: 03034656 Registered Office: Incorporated: 17/03/1995 22 COTTAGE OFFICES LATIMER PARK LOATIMER ROAD CHESHAM BUCKINGHAMSHIRE HP5 1TU Company Type: Private Limited Report Status: Full Data Accounts Type: Small Company Latest Accounts to: 30/09/2004 Latest Return to: 17/03/2006 Roger probably moved the company to a new address ... Oh by the way: John Deacon moved his company as well to the same address: GOLDFINCH PRODUCTIONS LIMITED Registered No. 01235790 22 COTTAGE OFFICES LATIMER PARK, LATIMER ROAD, CHESHAM, BUCKINGHAMSHIRE, HP5 1TU Brian's company (also at the Mill,Mill lane) Flackward Limited Registered No. 02779351 THE MILL, MILL LANE, COOKHAM, BERKSHIRE, SL6 9QT Freddie's company MIGHTYTAPE LIMITED Registered No. 01891681 REGINA HOUSE 124 FINCHLEY ROAD, LONDON, NW3 5JS GOOSE PRODUCTIONS LIMITED Registered No. 01220218 REGINA HOUSE, 124 FINCHLEY ROAD, LONDON, NW3 5JS MERCURY SONGS LIMITED Registered No. 01346089 REGINA HOUSE 124 FINCHLEY ROAD, LONDON, NW3 5JS by the way: these 3 Freddie companies are now registred on Nyman Libson Paul Mr Anthony Pins (Regina House 124 Finchley Road London NW5 5JS, ) |
| TRS-Romania 19.06.2006 10:04 |
When searching for Directors/secretary's in a company the following occured: VERONICA AGNES DEACON 6 BRIAR WALK LONDON SW15 I didnt know here middle name was Agnes... well since our dear John is registred as well as a director: JOHN RICHARD DEACON 6 BRIAR WALK LONDON W15 And then we have Mary (of course she's a director of some (?) of Freddie's companies: MARY GEOGINA AUSTIN GARDEN LODGE 1 LOGAN PLACE LONDON W8 6QN Did anybody know her middle name was Geogina? I sure did not know By the way this is all public information .. |
| Togg 19.06.2006 10:56 |
Before you start posting too much stuff on the website, it is worth pointing out that these are registered offices and the band members pretty much never go there. When you register a company you can use your solicitors address, it's doesn't have to be the office you work from. The Cookham address is a recording studio with offices, It has been owned by both Elton and Chris Rea in it's time, in fact I think Roger and John recorded with Elton there in the 80's. It was Elton's main studio for several albums. But more recently Queen have run part of their business from it, I believe it still has a full studio there but Queen don't use it as such. If you have already found them (and it's not difficult) I would think carefully about posting band members home addresses on this site, I think that's personal information that should remain private. |
| Penetration_Guru 19.06.2006 16:10 |
Can we please edit all address info out of this thread. It doesn't add any value to the discussion. |
| TRS-Romania 19.06.2006 16:11 |
Togg wrote: I would think carefully about posting band members home addresses on this site, I think that's personal information that should remain private.Personal information? Togg , are you informed that this information is freely available (without paying, without subcription) on the Internet? It should remain private while it is already public??? I definately do not see your point! Please enlighten me with the correct arguments! Stefan PS Is our mr Deaky selling is property at Briar Walk, Putney , London? (without kidding, I've een John's house in 1997 when I was in Putney, London), and it really (if I remember well) looks like his house! Or am I completely mistaken??? link and Deaky is probably thinking of buying: link (bloody hell!!! 15.000.000 Pounds Sterling!???) |
| Bohardy 19.06.2006 19:29 |
Stefan: I think the point is, that while these addresses may be in the public domain, it's not advisable to post them on a forum populated by dangerously obsessive teenage fan-girls (and fan-boys), for obvious reasons. Yes, if they had enough wherewithal and resourcefulness, these borderline obsessives could find out the info you posted for themselves, but spoonfeeding these potential stalkers the information they desire is not good practice. I'm on the electoral roll, so anyone could probably find out my address if they knew enough basic information about me. Yet if you posted my address on here without my consent I hope you can appreciate I wouldn't be best pleased. Being famous doesn't make any difference to the situation. |
| Crazy LittleThing 19.06.2006 23:28 |
While it may be public information, there's no good reason to post these addresses here. It's cool that you want to share what you've discovered, but please consider removing these addresses. It's painfully clear that many people who frequent this board have no qualms about loitering, vandalizing private property, and violating personal privacy, and they seem to have plenty of free time to do it. |
| Togg 20.06.2006 06:03 |
It's a simple MORAL issue, yes the information is out there if you go look for it, but then again so is YOUR home address Telephone number etc etc, so would you like it posted on a forum website? There are to many nutters out there that don't have the smarts to find it, but you are posting it for them in plain view. Something should remain private, if you don't understand that you have a problem my friend. Thankfully that is not John's house, and why you think he is buying the other is beyond me. Please Your Valantine if you are reading this can I also suggest it is monitored and edited to remove sensitive information. Just beacuse they are famous doesn't mean they have no right to privacy. Anybody who runs a company or votes has there personal information kept in PUBLIC records, that doesn't mean we all want it available to everyone, be a little bit more sensitive and grow up. |
| gnomo 20.06.2006 09:31 |
TRS-Romania wrote:PS Is our mr Deaky selling is property at Briar Walk, Putney , London?Not his house: his gates are more like solid panels, you can not see through them. |
| Serry... 20.06.2006 10:09 |
What the useless threads I start usually... OMG... |
| TRS-Romania 20.06.2006 16:01 |
Serry LOL! Take it with a pinch of salt ... any person in Holland/Romania/England can check data at the chamber of commerce. And really the members of Queen are using "office" adresses in general, and what if they use private adresses in the end... If I published it here, or it is publicly published on any chamber of commerce site which is accessable to the public, there is no need to complain. If some "wacky" fan wants to find it out, it's out in the open anyway. Besides this it is very well known were Mary Austin lives, it is known where John Deacon lives, as well as Roger (who had his house on sale!) and Brian... There is in my opinion no argument at all to questiont the fact that this public information should be "sensored" because somebody assumes that someone might be crazy enough to go to the places or try to meet the members of Queen... Queenzoner "Togg" wants to point out I should not be publishing this data, while it's only a click away on the many UK websites which offer this information ... If I am this "clever" ... don't you think that any ordinary person will be able to find this info in a few minutes. Give me a break! Stefan PS Just be glad that I did not publish Mary Austin's phonenumber at Garden Lodge, since even this phonenumber was in the UK phone directory and accessible to anyone (some years ago!) PS Sensorship on public information as suggested by Togg is in my opinion out of order... PS If people are willing we can publish all the financial statements of Queen Productions Ltd, Duck Productions , Mercury Songs Ltd ... even IF somebody would do that, I don't see a problem, since it is PUBLIC information to be found on the net just a click (and some GBP) away Just my humble opinion ... |
| Penetration_Guru 20.06.2006 16:11 |
You say they are office addresses, but include Garden lodge.....? Please, read Bohardy's post and DO THE RIGHT THING. THis is not censorship, this is common sense. |
| TRS-Romania 20.06.2006 16:27 |
... Mary Austin .. Freddie Mercury ... Garden Lodge ... London ... try Google using these keywords some of the first results: link (including map+ directions+ pictures) If you are using "garden lodge freddie mercury" you will find: link Quote: "Where is Freddie's house? Can I see it while I'm in London? Freddie's house is at "Garden Lodge",1 Logan Place in Kensington, London" Looking for "garden lodge mary austin" on Google gives you on Google Earth the map (and picture) of the house link (You will need to have Google Earth installed when clicking on the link link Just wondering what is so "senstitive" about this information when talking about "Garden Lodge" or Mary Austin ?! ... Stefan |
| Bobby_brown 20.06.2006 18:40 |
I think TS-Romania is right about this. When they put their personal adresses as being their companies adresses they know that they will be public! And they are celebrities, so it would be dificult to hide from the public. If you´re going to hide away from crazy fans all your life, then it´s better not to leave home. Really, i don´t think they´re in great danger of being harmed by some fanatic! It´s risk of being famous, but i don´t think that living with extreme caution will do the goods. Our old Roger go to pubs at night, and even our dear John went to stripclubs, so... do you think they feel threatned? The point is, of course there are lunatics out there, but if they want to guive their private adresses as the company adresses, then it´s a risk they´re willing to take, because that information will be avaiable to the world, so i really don´t see why that information shouldn´t be shared (and to be honest, i´m not that interested in that , but...). If you can google it, then... Let´s not end our discussions because of the bad guys. Serry started this topic that can be interesting for some people, and to let the discussion in the midle because of the bad guys out there doesn´t seem very apropriate to do, simply because you´re not guiving any private information (or information they would want to keep private). Take care |
| Togg 21.06.2006 03:45 |
TRS you are malicus and irresponsible, not to mention being a total attention seeking dick. |
| TRS-Romania 21.06.2006 05:07 |
oh ... namecalling? ;-) Hmmm... let's use your quote from the post towards mr Brooks you made recently (and I do agree with you here!) You wrote in that thread: "If you want to be taken seriously I suggest another tack, I always find by treating people in the way I would wish to be treated I get a better respons...." Well, it just boils down to "freedom of speech" I gues ... ;-) Don't worry I wont be calling you names in return mr Togg ;-) Stefan |
| Togg 21.06.2006 06:32 |
No you are totally right there I shouldn't lower myself to that level, Your response outraged me and for a fleeting second I let the anger get the better of me, now with that out of the way I suggest you read the other posts here and think hard about the MORAL issues of your posts. Why do you feel it is necessary to post this information, it serves no purpose other than to threaten the band members privacy, and if you are a fan why would you want to do that? can you show no respect for other peoples private time and space? Just because the information is out there doesn't mean it's morally right to slap it on a fan website, do you not understand the implications of your actions? sure you are not doing anything illegal, but you ARE doing something that can serve no purpose other than to shout out 'hey look at me, I have all this knowledge about the private lives of the band' They have families and deserve to be treated with the same level of respect as anyone outside the world of the media. Seeing as pretty well all who have commented seem to agree with me do you not see that you are possibly doing something that might be considered bad taste and irresponsible? So I apologize for the 'dick' comment but until you display some form of self restraint I am afraid you will receive little respect from me. I am sure that is not really a big worry to you but I suggest you are making yourself look a fool here, and I can only think you are doing it for the attention, why else it serves no other purpose and possibly can bring considerable harm and distress to members of the band you claim to be a fan of. Can you not see that they get little privacy as it is? why would you make it even harder for them? are they not deserving of private time? do you dislike them that much? As you seem intent on posting as much personal information as possible, including things like the Freddie Xmas video, I don't think you can really claim to be a fan, if you were you would show a level of respect to the band members, it has nothing to do with freedom of speech, and you are misinterpreting that freedom if you believe it is. I am disgusted at your attitude, even the British press don't publish celebrities home address, they at least refrain from sinking that low. Show a little respect for the people that have given you so much pleasure, if you are a fan that is? |
| TRS-Romania 21.06.2006 07:58 |
i got your point. I appriciate your opinion :) |
| Togg 21.06.2006 08:34 |
I am glad you understand, and I hope you remember when you find other so called 'private' things that you could post, that it may have implications beyond just a fan website. Please think carefully before posting here, freedom of speech yes, but not at the cost of people's freedom and safty not to mention private time. thank you One final thing, I would like to suggest you remove your post containing the addresses, we don't need to know them, it is interesting to know the company names but anything else is not really adding anything. Please amend your posts accordingly if you would be so kind. I realise you may view this differently but think of it this way, at any point in the future some nutter can be searching through Queenzone and find just enough information to make life very difficult for the band if they so desired. Please give it some thought. |
| TRS-Romania 21.06.2006 08:40 |
I didn't say I agreed with you! ;-) ;-) ;-) take care Stefan |
| Togg 21.06.2006 09:15 |
Pity, I thought you were a fan, I was obviously mistaken. |
| YourValentine 21.06.2006 09:25 |
I agree with Bohardy, PG, Togg and whowever else says that it's disgusting to disrespect the privacy of the band members. I do not expect that TRS listens. Someone who posts private videos of little children on the internet, surely has not much of a moral code you can appeal to. |
| TRS-Romania 21.06.2006 10:04 |
thank you for sharing your opinion. |
| Togg 21.06.2006 10:33 |
As you can see TRS I am not alone in thinking this to be irresponsible behaviour. You have shown yourself to have little or no moral code. It is your character that is being displayed in a negative light, and any rational human being would understand the right to privacy. You breached that right the first time with the posting of the video, I'm sure Mary would be delighted to see her child spread across the Internet, now you show total disrespect for others by attempting to post private addresses, Yes private! across the Internet. I do not believe you deserve any respect whatsoever, Queen themselves have penned songs inspired by people like you, but as a so called fan one would have hoped you could have been smart enough to understand what they were saying. I have seen some things in very poor taste on this sight but this is the lowest. |
| Saint Jiub 21.06.2006 11:01 |
I thought this topic was dead, and was going to be off the first page where fanatic fans could not find it. Oh well |
| TRS-Romania 21.06.2006 17:49 |
Togg, thank you as well for sharing your side of the story. No offence :) Stefan |
| Serry... 15.07.2006 10:01 |
The following companies from my list are working under EMI Music Publishing Ltd: Duck Productions Ltd Queen Music Ltd Goldfinch Productions Ltd Nightjar Productions Ltd Mercury Songs Ltd ----- Roger is also shareholder in Cornwall Local Radio Ltd |