| Sir Archie 'Tiffany' Leach 29.05.2004 14:06 |
Dear Sir As you may have noticed Queenzone is turning into a breeding ground for ne'er do wells and reprobates. Now I'm all for freedom of speech, to an extent, but the litany of 'poop', 'ah yeah' and 'push my penis in your vagina' is pushing this right to its limits. Mr Orchard you once disposed Queenzone of Jake Britt for much less than the garbage churned out by Charles Baer. It's all very well claiming that we should ignore him but there are those 'Zoners who have a secret agenda to keep Charles Baer in the public domain by constantly replying to his threads. The time for action is Now! Please ban Charles Baer for crimes against decency, morality and Queenzone. Yours sincerely Sir Archibald Leach |
| BornToBeKings 29.05.2004 14:07 |
Thank you for this, Sir Archie. |
| Daburcor? 29.05.2004 14:08 |
I'm with Archie on this one. Is there anything you can do? |
| Mayboy 29.05.2004 14:15 |
agreed dunno whats happening lately, bizarre, ppl seem to be catching the Charles Baer bug...and its not good...we should spray ourselfves with something guys, make sure we dont get it |
| deleted user 29.05.2004 14:18 |
I don't usually respond to these sort of posts...but I have to agree. As a poster who has steered clear of replying to Charles' topics, I am becoming increasingly irritated by all this spam. |
| Saint Jiub 29.05.2004 14:30 |
Yawn - a waste of time. It is rather easy - don't open topics created by Not Charles Baer. Mr, Baer is a gnat - no need for the heavy artillery. |
| BornToBeKings 29.05.2004 14:35 |
However, Mr. Baer is beginning to infiltrate other posts as well (and not just Peter North's)... |
| Saint Jiub 29.05.2004 14:42 |
It is easy to skip over a one or two word post. I hear QOL is Baer free for those who are interested. |
| BornToBeKings 29.05.2004 14:47 |
It's not easy to skip those posts once he gets going...it totally kills what is almost always a legitamite topic. Furthermore, he and his cronies clog the topic list with random, vulgar, and pointless junk. |
| Saint Jiub 29.05.2004 14:50 |
Funny - I can avoid most of it. If you want a moderator - go to QOL. |
| YourValentine 29.05.2004 15:08 |
I really hope we don't get censorship because of two or three childish idiots who smoked the wrong stuff and have nothing better to do than to spam this notice board with their kindergarten fights. |
| YourValentine 29.05.2004 15:17 |
Well, I wonder what is wrong with you, Mr. Peter Albert North IV or whatever your name is these days. Are you grounded and don't know what to do with your time? |
| inu-liger 29.05.2004 17:54 |
I agree that these tossers are ruining what was once a great board :( |
| rhapsody__87 29.05.2004 19:24 |
Thank you Archie! It's not a good feeling when I click on the Personal section expecting a fun post when all I see are quite suggestive titles about different sex positions. Not something I like to see when I come home from school, rather, any time of the day! Get rid of Charles Baer, please! |
| dragonzflame 29.05.2004 19:56 |
But it's not really censorship, removing annoying people. The majority of posters here are normal people who like to have good discussions. They don't have to write suggestive, immature things to get attention. Losers like this have been banned before like Jake, his various alter-egos and ol' Ted in the interests of making the board a better place for those who use it properly so why not again? I'm all for freedom of speech but people who abuse it have to take the consequences. Thanks Archie! :-) |
| andYYY 29.05.2004 20:02 |
"Bravo" |
| iron eagle 29.05.2004 20:07 |
it always seems those who egg these folks on by replying to them time and time again, are the ones to so quickly call for a removal one month-- goodbye forever next month a sudden return and a call to get rid of someone else--- and a few 'fuck offs' thrown in there for good measure...... if you cant stand the heat in the kitchen then get out of it esp. since you helped create the fire in the first damn place |
| Sir Archie 'Tiffany' Leach 29.05.2004 21:17 |
'it always seems those who egg these folks on by replying to them time and time again, are the ones to so quickly call for a removal' Christ I can see the yellow stripe from here. Why don't you name names when you produce provactive statements like this? I don't think you are taking a swipe at me on account of the fact I've replied to CB only twice. On both accounts in the last couple of days because quite frankly he's getting on my tits. I'm calling for his removal due to the vulgarity and amount of spam he's producing. Also why should I leave the kitchen if I can't stand the heat when I can simply open a window and have the heat removed? As has been pointed out above CB has recently begun spamming more serious topics from other Queenzoners with his banal posts. A sidenote to this is my belief in karma. What goes around, comes around. CB, a bus and a visit to hospital spring to mind. |
| Saint Jiub 29.05.2004 23:30 |
As I recall, Ted and Jake were banned for excessively abusing other posters. Charles has abused no one. Sure - he is annnoying, but so are many other posters on this board ... and he is soooo easy to ignore. Why smash a gnat with a sledge hammer? |
| NoOneButYou1975 29.05.2004 23:57 |
Bullwinkle wrote: As I recall, Ted and Jake were banned for excessively abusing other posters. Charles has abused no one. Sure - he is annnoying, but so are many other posters on this board ... and he is soooo easy to ignore. Why smash a gnat with a sledge hammer?AMEN!! btw.... weenis LOL |
| iron eagle 30.05.2004 00:03 |
exactly bullwinkle you know i have been here since 97-seen alot-put up with alot-taken alot i have been around long enough tosee alot worse then what has got some panties up in a wad these days... sir archie i dont need to name names,those that have egged it on are already there to see -- simply pull a thread up its all there in black and white-- go back 77 days or so-- your also right it was not a swipe at you it is also something that i have said many times before so it really is nothing 'new' - |
| Maz 30.05.2004 00:53 |
The Eagle speaks the truth. Mr. Baer gets some attention from a few and his posts increase. When people ignore him, his posts decrease. As it happens now, a few have decided to egg him on and we are once again calling for banning. One slight observation that I think needs to be considered by those who oppose outright banning. Recently, besides interjecting in other, more serious topics, the titles of Mr Baer's topics have become more and more vulgar in nature (Lubrication and anus in one sentence, yippee!). I think by arguing against banning, we have actually emboldened his behavior. At some point, a line will have to be drawn. |
| iGSM 30.05.2004 01:19 |
< It's fun. |
| D.Blythe 30.05.2004 01:43 |
I predict that we will soon see another side of C.Baer when he sees how many people are calling for him to be banned. We will see Charles Baer, the "freedom fighter". He will towel off his hands long enough to post a reminder to all of us that censorship is wrong and that there is such a thing known as free speech. I know. He has told me before. He knows that if he does not personally attack anyone with his posts, he will not be banned. I wish Richard would prove him wrong. To those who sagely advise to skip Baer's topics and not read them, thanks to Baer we do not need to open the topic to be offended, the TITLE of the topic is offensive. Even if I do not open the topic, reading the title as I scan for a topic of interest is enough. I stopped responding to that dung beetle's topics long ago. I wish everyone would. As far as smashing a gnat with a sledgehammer, that is the American way. Ask Grenada. |
| rmtfictionqueen 30.05.2004 14:28 |
*applaudes Archie* This is the only forum I'm a part of that has spammers like this and for newbies, it ruins it. It will scare some away and it won't be a fun place anymore. |
| -fatty- 2850 30.05.2004 16:33 |
Looking back over the past 77 days I noticed that Charles Baer has started 75 topics. Three of them actually made sense but the rest were invitations to subscribe to his website, get it on or to cover his mother's droopy breasts in hot sticky man goo. Ok so he's a sad bastard but it's the same people who keep replying to his posts who bleat on about wanting him banned. Matt, Poodle Permed, Dan, Brian May's wig, Look out here come the killer cicadas and Barry UK in particular. Come on folks, you should know better than to waste your time trying. Best of all is our new Britthead Mr Peter North who fights the good fight by replying to Baer's posts an amazing 52 times. Please please please please please ignore them and let Charles and Mr North enjoy themselves in peace. You don't have to ban them, just let them get on with their lives. They can have a whole topic to themselves where they can get it on and use their own muck for toothpaste. fatty. |
| Into La Ment 30.05.2004 17:03 |
Matt, Poodle Permed, Dan, Brian May's wig, Look out here come the killer cicadas |
| deleted user 30.05.2004 17:27 |
Right. You don't have to reply. True enough. When I come to this board to see the topics that may interest me, I see the assinine titles that either one of the idiots start. That in and of itself is offencive not just to me, but to many posters here. They contain jibberish and nonsence and language that you find in porn mags. I am tired of it. Even if you don't open the thread, or even post in it. They are still there like turds in a punch bowl staring you in the face. It's sickening. And annoying. I don't care what has been brought up in the last 77 days, and posted by whom. So what. You let them have their nonsence on here. What do you care if people who are intelligent, or more so than you, want to look at something other than 'smell my farts'. But then again. You may like it. |
| Flashman 30.05.2004 17:33 |
The most enjoyable way of dealing with that bag o'shite is to just reply to other threads, thus pushing his spam off the board. Granted, this can be rather difficult at times with topics about Food, Skid Row, Camels, McDonalds and all that crap. Fatty has it just about right - if you ignore it, like all boils it will just go away. Mind you, it's also fun to squeeze said boil and watch all the puss spurt out. Apologies if you're eating. |
| Daburcor? 30.05.2004 17:33 |
"Matt, Poodle Permed, Dan, Brian May's wig, Look out here come the killer cicadas" Oh! SHIT!!!! *runs from the cicadas* |
| rhapsody__87 30.05.2004 18:36 |
Still haven't gotten those cicadas... but I'm NOT complaining! |
| Flashman 30.05.2004 18:42 |
Don't worry Erica, I would shield you from those pesky cicadas if push comes to shove. What the devil are they anyway? They ain't big buggers are they? I think I've sprained an ankle. |
| rhapsody__87 30.05.2004 18:44 |
Lame-o. But thank you for the offer, o Brave Flashman. |
| BornToBeKings 30.05.2004 19:45 |
Cicadas are actually pretty big for a bug, but they don't bite humans or even eat other insects. Most of their 17-year lifespan is spent underground as they grow to maturity. When they emerge for the last month or so of their lives, their impact is pretty much limited to eating foliage, making a LOUD sound, mating, laying eggs, and dying. So, no, they aren't much of a hassle at all. We've got some here and it's really just blown all out of proportion. |
| Lisser 30.05.2004 20:48 |
On the issue of baer, Fatty is completey, 100% right on how to deal with him and his fans. If you don't feed the fire, it eventually burns out. And that is all the time I'll waste on that subject. Thank goodness for fatty!!! :) |
| dragonzflame 31.05.2004 05:14 |
when I was a kid I used to collect cicada shells that I'd found on trees. It was fun and I had quite a few until my mum, pronouncing them "disgusting" made me chuck them out. |
| iGSM 31.05.2004 07:53 |
Tut, tut..typical Kiwi thing to do. Next thing you'll be complaining about the underarm incident and us stealing Russel Crowe, the Pavalova and discovering flight 3 weeks before the Wright Brothers. |
| Margo 31.05.2004 16:24 |
we have cicadas EVERYWHERE. it smells like cheese cos of all of them dying everywhere. and i don't care about baer- i just wish that people would stop replying to his posts. |
| rmtfictionqueen 31.05.2004 20:50 |
Anybody ever thought about threatening him that we'll pull a "Lorena Bobbitt: the next tiem he has a post like this? And for those of you who don't remember or know, Lorena Bobbitt was the one who chopped off her hubby's dick while he was asleep because he cheated on her. Can you say OUCH!? |
| dragonzflame 31.05.2004 21:28 |
>>Tut, tut..typical Kiwi thing to do. Next thing you'll be complaining about the underarm incident and us stealing Russel Crowe, the Pavalova and discovering flight 3 weeks before the Wright Brothers. Hmmm, well you DID steal the Pavlova, and history tells us that we did fly before the Wright Brothers. But you're perfectly welcome to Russell Crowe. ;-p |
| iGSM 01.06.2004 07:40 |
I wonder I wrote pavAlova..interesting. Still..we invented it. We're better than you *sticks tongue out* |
| MsMercury01 01.06.2004 17:38 |
So there is no one to ban this person from the board? Teri |
| dragonzflame 01.06.2004 20:42 |
>>Still..we invented it. We're better than you *sticks tongue out* *sticks tongue back out* you only claimed it when you heard that we'd invented it. If you had wanted it that badly you should have made it yourselves in the first place! And anyway, we're better than you cause OUR country isn't full of bloody loudmouth Ockers. And, of course, Hobbits roam free through ever street. ;-) Face it, you're driven to desperation - trying to claim Keisha Castle-Hughes and (dear God) Renee Zellweger? What next? "The All Blacks are the official Australian team"? *blows loud raspberry* |
| S@turn 02.06.2004 07:08 |
I agree with the "old timers" in here, of who I consider myself as well People are easy to be ignored, if you dont like what they say, just skip it, that's the internet If you think it is cool or helping your ego to say that some people must go, do so, you make then as annoying postings as some others, in my opinion Freedom of speech is great, freedom of moderatorship is wonderful and that's what I like here, no moderators and just in very exceptional cases an exit As said so many times before, best way to get off of people that are annoying is to ignore them totally Let your prescense (or however you write that) here be not because of your replies to the ones who do not need it (dont reply on this, hahaha) |
| iGSM 02.06.2004 09:58 |
I concede that your Prime Minister is more of a man than ours so that's at least one positive about New Zealand.. Can't think of any others. None the less I'd still like to travel to New Zealand :) |
| chancelloramethyst 03.06.2004 00:04 |
I've found out Baer's secret! That's right--Charles Baer is really John Deacon! Well, that or Brian May trying to irritate the Queen fans as he does so well.... oh, yeah, and... er, MAN TRUNCHEON. *blushes* |
| dragonzflame 03.06.2004 02:28 |
>>I concede that your Prime Minister is more of a man than ours so that's at least one positive about New Zealand.. LMAO! That's one of the funniest things I've heard all day! Class. :-D (for those of you not in the know she's a woman...but just barely. Think Margaret Thatcher.) |
| Fenderek 03.06.2004 07:59 |
"If you think it is cool or helping your ego to say that some people must go, do so, you make then as annoying postings as some others, in my opinion" GREAT ONE! Agree totally....! "(dont reply on this, hahaha)" ... shit... too late...:) |