QueenZone discussion #1590255

brENsKi wrote: yeah. i think there's some substance in it. they'd just finished recording together - the vibe would be either great or shit. obviously, however good it felt was heightened by the accomplishment of the finished recording. also in 2001 - RW was a big ticket, two huge solo albums. He'd just come off the back of the success of his sell-out USA "1999 Eagle Has Landed tour, so it makes sense that it could've helped shoehorn Queen back into the US. Perhaps his "nervousness" worked in his favour. Two years later he sold out Knebworth.

pittrek wrote: I'm pretty sure that I read an interview with Robbie from / in the early 2000s where he said that he asked Brian and Roger to join them and that Brian was excited for the idea

mooghead wrote: What do you know? Anyway, who cares who they wanted? It has been a fucking car crash since they even came up with the idea of replacing Freddie. And which version of Let Me Entertain You would they have done?

QE2. wrote: Robbie Williams is just a complete idiot.

QE2. wrote: With a name like Holly most holly's are dense like Willoughby so you are no different love!

QE2. wrote: With a name like Holly most holly's are dense like Willoughby so you are no different love!

Holly2003 wrote:

QE2. wrote: With a name like Holly most holly's are dense like Willoughby so you are no different love!

Could you write that in English please?

QE2. wrote:Brenski stop ranting you Irish suicide cunt.

blueblue

purplepurple

greengreen

orangeorange

brownbrown

redred

brENsKi wrote:Gerry, are you being paid by the BNP to be a racist pig?...or is racist pig your natural disposition?

DodgerBlueDodgerBlue

QE2. wrote:No need to quote me sonny boy i do know what i said! You are not a victim on here so do not play that card.

The Fairy King wrote:Let it go Brenski. This isn't going anywhere.

QE2. wrote: . . . You say you can take abuse etc.... so if that is the case what the fuck are you moaning about that, man up !

aristide1 wrote:In fact most of thomasquinn's and brensky's scraps are with Aristotle. Give me sensible thoughts and i'll give you back empathy.

AlbaNo1 wrote: This is an example of one of my posts . Trying to make a fair point, Thomas Quinn. How am I a troll? I am not part of a faction.I certainly will challenge the sense of entitlement of members with 20 odd thousand posts when they are casually dismissing every ones point of view . When I did so I was viscously attacked by Brenski who is clearly a knowledgeable poster but is without doubt an internet bully whose conduct at times would also not be tolerated in the real world, as you put it. AlbaNo1 wrote: The movie portrayed Freddie as being a bit soft when splitting from Mary. Portrayed him without any of the humour or charisma that comes across in his interviews. And portrayed him as the wayward, egotistical one. Brian’s role was that of the anchor and the voice of reason. We pretty much know that a lot of the band arguments were Freddie vs Brian . And Roger vs Brian. Even after Freddie had gone we know it was Roger &John vs Brian.But we don’t see what drove those. For sure this movie seems almost like it was from Brian’s perspective, however limited his official contribution is claimed to be.

QE2. wrote: @Alba1 Yes Brenski is an internet bully and i have been saying that for a long time on here but he always manages to blame someone else for the disgusting behaviour. Do not believe his false apologies if he sends you a private message because he done that with me and many others. He is trouble with a capital T. Beware of this twisted loony on here, and if he really is a retired prison worker he should have more common sense than to come on here than to rant at people just because they have a different opinion on things. Opinions are to share not bully.

AlbaNo1 wrote:Who have I fallen out with Brenski? Only you I think you’ll find. That’s quite a few short of almost everybody . I think a few others ,maybe DudeofQueen have also jumped in when you were getting out of order . Truth be told I cannot navigate this site well . I didn’t see your private message until you posted it publicly. Given that you have called me an idiot, told me to go back to the nothingness I belong and so on, an apology is more fitting than a peace offering.

QE2. wrote:Brenski i have Not had 5 of my user names banned that is a lie and i have not had three whole pages banning my comments, you are a Walter Mitty character always making things up to make yourself look like the victim like you always do abusing people over there command of English and spelling mistakes which is damned well rude. For your information there is more people on this site who are damned well more rude than me, and strange how they get away with abusing people but you do not pick them up do you? If you and your other half Vocal Harmony where less opinionated we would not have any rows on here in the first place. Let the people have there say instead of ruining the thread like you always do with YOUR rants. You say you are a nice guy yet you have still not apologised calling me a liar over that Milton Keynes concert where there was street lamps in the distance of Roger's drums, i provided a photo to prove that but you still have not said sorry. If you play nice i do but i do NOT tolerate bullies lightly or anyone who thinks they can get one over on me.

QE2. wrote: If you and your other half Vocal Harmony where less opinionated we would not have any rows on here in the first place. . . .

QE2. wrote:Brenski i have Not had 5 of my user names banned that is a lie and i have not had three whole pages banning my comments,

thomasquinn 32989 wrote:You do realize that your name-change also shows up for your old posts, right?

red** wrote: ThomasQuinn I am rock royalty on here have you not noticed? Sure my name changes are as popular as Adam Lambert dinning out with Vladimir Putin lol