richrich 26.09.2019 12:43 |
|
Sealion 26.09.2019 12:52 |
No. My family is half German, half British. We travel back and forth a lot. Plus, the Brexit campaign was full of lies anyway, that too many stupid people believed. Even if it’s a democratic vote: My opinion is, that the average citizen doesn’t have the knowledge to decide about something as complex as the Brexit. With all the lies that were spread, people decided with their hearts and their guts. But without understanding the consequences. |
Nathan H 27.09.2019 09:21 |
I couldn't vote too young but if I could now it would be remain as I can't see what the good points are. The big points claimed by Brexiteers before the referendum have now been shown as lies or are unrealistic. I just hope we don't leave with a no deal because the UK will be doomed. |
runner_70 27.09.2019 11:31 |
What has this to do with QAL????? Better vote for keeping Lameturd out of Queen |
stevelondon20 27.09.2019 11:33 |
runner_70 wrote: What has this to do with QAL????? Better vote for keeping Lameturd out of QueenShut up you bell end. |
runner_70 27.09.2019 19:23 |
stevelondon20 wrote:What has this to do with QAL dickheadrunner_70 wrote: What has this to do with QAL????? Better vote for keeping Lameturd out of QueenShut up you bell end. |
stevelondon20 27.09.2019 21:48 |
runner_70 wrote:Nothing you cunt, but the voting comment was unnecessary.stevelondon20 wrote:What has this to do with QAL dickheadrunner_70 wrote: What has this to do with QAL????? Better vote for keeping Lameturd out of QueenShut up you bell end. |
Jimmy Dean 28.09.2019 09:08 |
As a Canadian looking in... the initial vote result was too narrow to make that decision. And the aftermath proves it. What an utter waste of time and money. |
Vocal harmony 28.09.2019 14:09 |
Jimmy Dean wrote: As a Canadian looking in... the initial vote result was too narrow to make that decision. And the aftermath proves it. What an utter waste of time and money.You're absolutely right. But it's worse than that. The vote was given to the country by a prime minister who didn't really care about people, had used the EU as an excuse for not spending money in certain areas of the country claiming the EU didn't allow it, and also made several claims that the EU cost the UK more than it gave back. . . ad to all this his resignation after the leave side "won" despite promising to stay to see the process of leaving through. He lost a referendum in Scotland before the brexit vote over Scottish independence. Both referendums were offered because he thought he could increase his and his party's majority in parliament. He failed twice. The brexit side and the remain side both lied about what the outcome of the vote would bring, and are still doing so. When he resigned two days after the referendum, the government should have cancelled the whole thing as the person who brought it to the country, and had said he would be responsible for the process, turned tail and ran. |
thomasquinn 32989 30.09.2019 09:33 |
Not only is it a terrible decision to leave the UK, the incompetent, hamfisted way in which David Cameron handled the whole thing, and jumped ship immediately after falling flat on his face, guarantees that, whichever result the UK ends up with, the people will be deeply divided for years, the trust *within* both labour and the conservatives is broken, the relationships with Scotland and Northern Ireland have been damaged further, and the risk of renewed violence in Northern Ireland is very real. |
Vocal harmony 30.09.2019 13:30 |
thomasquinn 32989 wrote: Not only is it a terrible decision to leave the UK, the incompetent, hamfisted way in which David Cameron handled the whole thing, and jumped ship immediately after falling flat on his face, guarantees that, whichever result the UK ends up with, the people will be deeply divided for years, the trust *within* both labour and the conservatives is broken, the relationships with Scotland and Northern Ireland have been damaged further, and the risk of renewed violence in Northern Ireland is very real.Agreed, absolutely. I think in more politically and militarily unstable countries given this situation violence or even civil war would be close to breaking out. Cameron like Mre May was in office to put his name in history while having little regard to what the job was really about. |
Sealion 30.09.2019 13:34 |
Mr. Cameron expected a different outcome. He gambled and lost. And the whole of the UK has to endure the consequences. |
runner_70 03.10.2019 07:49 |
Still- what has this to do with QAL? Idiot. |
Vocal harmony 03.10.2019 11:21 |
runner_70 wrote: Still- what has this to do with QAL? Idiot.Sorry did someone say something?. . . . Oh it's you again. |
runner_70 03.10.2019 12:00 |
Vocal harmony wrote:Idiotrunner_70 wrote: Still- what has this to do with QAL? Idiot.Sorry did someone say something?. . . . Oh it's you again. |
SweetCaroline 03.10.2019 12:14 |
They need to get the clown Boris Johnson out of there as soon as possible. He and Trump are doing Putin’s dirty work to disrupt democracy and the free world. |
Vocal harmony 03.10.2019 12:40 |
runner_70 wrote:Why are you bothering with this site. You've made it clear that you think everyone with even a whisper of intelligence is an idiot. Why not go somewhere else and mix with people how posses an equal amount of maturity as you and hate everything in equal measure to you.Vocal harmony wrote:Idiotrunner_70 wrote: Still- what has this to do with QAL? Idiot.Sorry did someone say something?. . . . Oh it's you again. If you do that you won't stand out in the crowd as being the real idiot. |
runner_70 03.10.2019 17:12 |
Vocal harmony wrote:Americans posting on a Queen site in the QAL sections about BRexit. Idiots.runner_70 wrote:Why are you bothering with this site. You've made it clear that you think everyone with even a whisper of intelligence is an idiot. Why not go somewhere else and mix with people how posses an equal amount of maturity as you and hate everything in equal measure to you. If you do that you won't stand out in the crowd as being the real idiot.Vocal harmony wrote:Idiotrunner_70 wrote: Still- what has this to do with QAL? Idiot.Sorry did someone say something?. . . . Oh it's you again. |
Vocal harmony 04.10.2019 16:45 |
runner_70 wrote:I'm not American, you however are the fool we all know you to be.Vocal harmony wrote:Americans posting on a Queen site in the QAL sections about BRexit. Idiots.runner_70 wrote:Why are you bothering with this site. You've made it clear that you think everyone with even a whisper of intelligence is an idiot. Why not go somewhere else and mix with people how posses an equal amount of maturity as you and hate everything in equal measure to you. If you do that you won't stand out in the crowd as being the real idiot.Vocal harmony wrote:Idiotrunner_70 wrote: Still- what has this to do with QAL? Idiot.Sorry did someone say something?. . . . Oh it's you again. As you've bought an anti American argument to this, let me ask you. Are you an ex East German Communist or do you represent the current small group of formally West German Nazi's |
runner_70 04.10.2019 16:48 |
Vocal harmony wrote:Neither. I have a question for you. Are you an arrogant cunt or a brainless idiot? Or even both? Sad Glambert-POS. And you belong to those that complain about insulting? Ironic. Wankholerunner_70 wrote:I'm not American, you however are the fool we all know you to be. As you've bought an anti American argument to this, let me ask you. Are you an ex East German Communist or do you represent the current small group of formally West German Nazi'sVocal harmony wrote:Americans posting on a Queen site in the QAL sections about BRexit. Idiots.runner_70 wrote:Why are you bothering with this site. You've made it clear that you think everyone with even a whisper of intelligence is an idiot. Why not go somewhere else and mix with people how posses an equal amount of maturity as you and hate everything in equal measure to you. If you do that you won't stand out in the crowd as being the real idiot.Vocal harmony wrote:Idiotrunner_70 wrote: Still- what has this to do with QAL? Idiot.Sorry did someone say something?. . . . Oh it's you again. |
Vocal harmony 04.10.2019 16:55 |
runner_70 wrote:It was a straight forward question because your posts seem to be filed with the same hate both those political extremes publish.Vocal harmony wrote:Neither. I have a question for you. Are you an arrogant cunt or a brainless idiot? Or even both? Sad Glambert-POS. And you belong to those that complain about insulting? Ironic. Wankholerunner_70 wrote:I'm not American, you however are the fool we all know you to be. As you've bought an anti American argument to this, let me ask you. Are you an ex East German Communist or do you represent the current small group of formally West German Nazi'sVocal harmony wrote:Americans posting on a Queen site in the QAL sections about BRexit. Idiots.runner_70 wrote:Why are you bothering with this site. You've made it clear that you think everyone with even a whisper of intelligence is an idiot. Why not go somewhere else and mix with people how posses an equal amount of maturity as you and hate everything in equal measure to you. If you do that you won't stand out in the crowd as being the real idiot.Vocal harmony wrote:Idiotrunner_70 wrote: Still- what has this to do with QAL? Idiot.Sorry did someone say something?. . . . Oh it's you again. Again you've taken the bate and bit. You are beyond easy to second guess. You're incabable of seeing what's in front of you and yet again you pull the insult trigger. . . Ironic wank whole seems to sum you up quite well |
runner_70 04.10.2019 19:16 |
As I said - sad Glamtard insulting others and not being able to take some. Just Go away. And close the door on your way out |
youngballantyne 05.10.2019 05:13 |
I think Adam Lambert and what’s left of the uk should both brexit |
runner_70 05.10.2019 08:30 |
youngballantyne wrote: I think Adam Lambert and what’s left of the uk should both brexitLamebird is American. |
Vocal harmony 05.10.2019 11:43 |
runner_70 wrote: As I said - sad Glamtard insulting others and not being able to take some. Just Go away. And close the door on your way outIt's you who have a long history of insults to your name. And it's you who can't take what you dish out. Anyone can scroll back to see your legacy of shit. |
runner_70 05.10.2019 12:07 |
Vocal harmony wrote:YOu are a fucking shit stirring POS. R E A D IT. T W IC Erunner_70 wrote: As I said - sad Glamtard insulting others and not being able to take some. Just Go away. And close the door on your way outIt's you who have a long history of insults to your name. And it's you who can't take what you dish out. Anyone can scroll back to see your legacy of shit. |
Vocal harmony 05.10.2019 12:56 |
runner_70 wrote:You don't like the truth do you.Vocal harmony wrote:YOu are a fucking shit stirring POS. R E A D IT. T W IC Erunner_70 wrote: As I said - sad Glamtard insulting others and not being able to take some. Just Go away. And close the door on your way outIt's you who have a long history of insults to your name. And it's you who can't take what you dish out. Anyone can scroll back to see your legacy of shit. |
runner_70 05.10.2019 13:25 |
Vocal harmony wrote:Truth is you are a shit stirring Glambert not a Queen fan.runner_70 wrote:You don't like the truth do you.Vocal harmony wrote:YOu are a fucking shit stirring POS. R E A D IT. T W IC Erunner_70 wrote: As I said - sad Glamtard insulting others and not being able to take some. Just Go away. And close the door on your way outIt's you who have a long history of insults to your name. And it's you who can't take what you dish out. Anyone can scroll back to see your legacy of shit. |
thomasquinn 32989 05.10.2019 13:55 |
The two of you need to take this elsewhere instead of cluttering up topic after topic with your idiotic fights. I don't care what you like or dislike, I don't care if you think you're right. This ends now. If you like, open a new fucking topic and fight it out there, but you WILL STOP hijacking other topics like this one and the UP bass line topic. Both of you. |
Vocal harmony 06.10.2019 15:37 |
thomasquinn 32989 wrote: The two of you need to take this elsewhere instead of cluttering up topic after topic with your idiotic fights. I don't care what you like or dislike, I don't care if you think you're right. This ends now. If you like, open a new fucking topic and fight it out there, but you WILL STOP hijacking other topics like this one and the UP bass line topic. Both of you.Thomas, you don't owne this site. There is no moderation and control and YOU DON'T tell me what to do! |
richrich 18.10.2019 16:13 |
Let us hope the UK does right by their citizens and leave the European Union on the 31st October. The majority of voters of the 2016 referendum voted to Leave and the MPs and the unelected dickheads at the House of Lords would love to put a stop to Brexit, as remaining in the EU is a gravy train for them. |
Dr Magus 19.10.2019 10:11 |
richrich wrote: Let us hope the UK does right by their citizens and leave the European Union on the 31st October. The majority of voters of the 2016 referendum voted to Leave and the MPs and the unelected dickheads at the House of Lords would love to put a stop to Brexit, as remaining in the EU is a gravy train for them.You are 100% correct. Leaving with no deal on the 31st will ensure we get the deal we want. |
runner_70 19.10.2019 11:42 |
The UK is digging its own grave. Have fun leaving you sad retards |
Holly2003 20.10.2019 09:04 |
https://media1.tenor.com/images/18b9430d1b4ff9470fe69f3410c4117e/tenor.gif?itemid=10384815 |
kosimodo 20.10.2019 21:29 |
Pls Runner, go back masturbating over Adams pics.. This is for adults only. |
richrich 10.05.2020 13:44 |
I predict that, in five months time, the UK will be back with non-stop coverage of Brexit and of Harry and Saint Meghan. There should be a very serious look into why the world was really locked down. |
brENsKi 01.06.2020 06:34 |
Sealion wrote:Even if it’s a democratic vote: My opinion is, that the average citizen doesn’t have the knowledge to decide about something as complex as the Brexit. With all the lies that were spread, people decided with their hearts and their guts. But without understanding the consequences.well then, (by your reasoning) the complex membership decision taken originally in the 1975 referendum, was also beyond the grasp of the "average citizen" - and therefore void. secondly, there were lies on both sides of the argument. The Remain Campaigners were far more aggressive and mendacious: Project Fear (the PM and Chancellor's own scheme) threatened UK citizens with an absolute "sky is falling" scenario. Barack Obama actually (on Cameron's request) threatened the UK - telling us we'd be "back of the queue with any trade deals". * these were Cameron's words - American's do not say "queue" - they'd used the word "line". |
Nathan H 26.09.2020 22:46 |
I'm still so angry about Brexit. I just feel that a lot of people who voted for Brexit believed too much by what key Brexiteers had to say e.g. £350m for the NHS. Where is it? We remaineers knew from the onset this was garbage but many people were too easily swayed. A lot of these would've been older people (they get conned because they believe what "companies" have to say) and poorer people (these are the people who live in rougher areas typically those north, the places where Tories gained in the last election due to their tours taking place there). How many people have changed their minds now seeing how much you can't trust people? I just bloody wished I could vote. |
brENsKi 27.09.2020 08:48 |
Nathan H wrote:I'm still so angry about Brexit. I just feel that a lot of people who voted for Brexit believed too much by what key Brexiteers had to say e.g. £350m for the NHS. Where is it?regardless of the accuracy of the £350m figure. why do you think you can demand any of it at this point in time? Whatever money is "earmarked" for the NHS will not become available until our EU financial responsibilities have ended. The UK is legally bound to pay upto £32bn per annum until the end of the Transition Period (Dec 31st 2020). However, beyond that there are financial commitments/agreements we have to abide by. more info here: link |
Nathan H 27.09.2020 11:11 |
brENsKi wrote:Do you believe that the UK will pay the £350m a week to the NHS instead of the EU every week? That was one of the main points from the leave side.Nathan H wrote:I'm still so angry about Brexit. I just feel that a lot of people who voted for Brexit believed too much by what key Brexiteers had to say e.g. £350m for the NHS. Where is it?regardless of the accuracy of the £350m figure. why do you think you can demand any of it at this point in time? Whatever money is "earmarked" for the NHS will not become available until our EU financial responsibilities have ended. The UK is legally bound to pay upto £32bn per annum until the end of the Transition Period (Dec 31st 2020). However, beyond that there are financial commitments/agreements we have to abide by. more info here: link Now on the subject of immigrants, leaving has made it worse. Now we can't just send them back because we don't have a free trade arrangement with France obviously because we're not part of the EU. Well at least I've never seen immigrants here as a bad thing I see it as a good thing to be honest and I wonder how many people just assumed that it would be stopped by simply the UK leaving the EU? I just feel that I don't think I've read one positive thing which has happened since we've left the EU. |
brENsKi 27.09.2020 13:06 |
Nathan H wrote:I just feel that I don't think I've read one positive thing which has happened since we've left the EU.because the UK hasn't finally left yet. Dec 31st 2020 is our final leave date, when the transition period ends. and don't buy into the hype about no positives. things will start to happen from Dec 31st. The Japan and Australia trade deals are just the start. Both countries are part of the Trans-Pacific Partnership has membership of 11 other countries (Canada & Mexico) included. stop reading the Guardian/Mirror and watching BBC/Channel 4 News. these outlets are purveyors of left-wing doom and national shame. |
Nathan H 28.09.2020 12:43 |
brENsKi wrote:Is it because of the media why you didn't answer my questions and points on the NHS or immigration? Is it because you know they spread news which is factually proven and scientific but disagrees with leavers?Nathan H wrote:I just feel that I don't think I've read one positive thing which has happened since we've left the EU.because the UK hasn't finally left yet. Dec 31st 2020 is our final leave date, when the transition period ends. and don't buy into the hype about no positives. things will start to happen from Dec 31st. The Japan and Australia trade deals are just the start. Both countries are part of the Trans-Pacific Partnership has membership of 11 other countries (Canada & Mexico) included. stop reading the Guardian/Mirror and watching BBC/Channel 4 News. these outlets are purveyors of left-wing doom and national shame. National shame? I'd rather read stuff which has proper references and is statistically proven than right wing stuff which is often utter bollocks and in some cases even racist or offensive to people's personal identites. |
brENsKi 28.09.2020 14:02 |
i did answer you. but, alas, your left-wing veil has dropped - you refuse to accept answers that you don't like. pity. we should all have open minds. fact is, the country voted - with lies on both sides of the campaigns. we voted leave, get on with it. you don;t get a do over / best of three, just because you didn;t like the outcome. Even the Lib Dems have now accepted the vote and decided to move on. you should follow your leader's advice and do the same. your comments really don't bear scrutiny. i suggest you check the BBC and how many times they've been caught out lying these last four years. |
Nathan H 28.09.2020 14:55 |
brENsKi wrote: i suggest you check the BBC and how many times they've been caught out lying these last four years.Evidence? |
brENsKi 28.09.2020 16:25 |
Nathan H wrote:you make points about "evidence" - how about your evidence for those who've changed their minds? utter rubbish. everyone knew it was a once in a generation vote. and your claim of the "mind changers" - again rubbish: the Tories swept to power in December - gaining Red Wall seats - that had NEVER voted Tory before. Why? because they stood on a Get Brexit Done ticket, while Labour - after 4 years had no idea what side of the Brexit fence they stood and the Lib Dems - stood to "overturn" the referendum. Both parties were slaughtered. Incidentally, all 21 of your "staunch remainers" who changed parties twice (or more) during 2019 - all lost their seats in December. Voters are not the fools you think, they remembered what their MPs told them in 2015, 16 and 17 and remembered how those very MPs defied a public vote - repeatedly. all - every last man Jack of 'em were unceremoniously booted out of office in December.brENsKi wrote: i suggest you check the BBC and how many times they've been caught out lying these last four years.Evidence? i don't want to argue with you. if you're so convinced you're right, hang onto those beliefs. i hope you'll be big enough to admit you're wrong in two years time, when the EU project is unravelling (Austria, Italy, Greece, Hungary, all want out) and the UK will stand strong in the World. my best guess? in two years time we won't be able to find a single person in the UK who will admit that they voted to remain. I know how I voted, and - at long last - after 4 years of obstruction, it's now happening, I didn't vote leave for myself, I voted leave so that my son and his generation (and those thereafter) will be better for this. i hope you don't mind, but please now find someone else (maybe a remain sympathizer) to continue this with, because it's clear you won't be swayed. and we know why, because the Remain campaign was only ever going to accept a result that they won. |
Nathan H 28.09.2020 19:59 |
brENsKi wrote:I don't think it's necessary the "get Brexit done" thing people voted for in the general election, I think it was because people were sick to death of it and wanted to get it out the way ??.Nathan H wrote:you make points about "evidence" - how about your evidence for those who've changed their minds? utter rubbish. everyone knew it was a once in a generation vote. and your claim of the "mind changers" - again rubbish: the Tories swept to power in December - gaining Red Wall seats - that had NEVER voted Tory before. Why? because they stood on a Get Brexit Done ticket, while Labour - after 4 years had no idea what side of the Brexit fence they stood and the Lib Dems - stood to "overturn" the referendum. Both parties were slaughtered. Incidentally, all 21 of your "staunch remainers" who changed parties twice (or more) during 2019 - all lost their seats in December. Voters are not the fools you think, they remembered what their MPs told them in 2015, 16 and 17 and remembered how those very MPs defied a public vote - repeatedly. all - every last man Jack of 'em were unceremoniously booted out of office in December. i don't want to argue with you. if you're so convinced you're right, hang onto those beliefs. i hope you'll be big enough to admit you're wrong in two years time, when the EU project is unravelling (Austria, Italy, Greece, Hungary, all want out) and the UK will stand strong in the World. my best guess? in two years time we won't be able to find a single person in the UK who will admit that they voted to remain. I know how I voted, and - at long last - after 4 years of obstruction, it's now happening, I didn't vote leave for myself, I voted leave so that my son and his generation (and those thereafter) will be better for this. i hope you don't mind, but please now find someone else (maybe a remain sympathizer) to continue this with, because it's clear you won't be swayed. and we know why, because the Remain campaign was only ever going to accept a result that they won.brENsKi wrote: i suggest you check the BBC and how many times they've been caught out lying these last four years.Evidence? And I'll be honest I get more worried everyday on the thought of it. I think the timing now of it now is typical because instead of the world uniting to fight coronavirus, the UK isn't going to be with most of Europe. I think Brexit is probably going to be better for richer societies but not poorer ones. There's no denying it will help some things but what's the catch? It's inevitable I think that food prices will go up as it's going to become more expensive to import. My whole family and everyone I know voted remain and most especially my family for my generation and younger. Anyway, I might not be here in two years |
brENsKi 28.09.2020 21:55 |
i really didn't want to come back into this discussion, but you quoted me again - after i asked nicely if you'd leave me out of it. anyhow, one final time - i'll address each of your points in turn:
blueno it wasn't. it was because the people in the former Labour Heartlands who voted leave, realised that Labour were no longer interested in them, they realised that the Tories would actually deliver Brexit. blueseriously? you think we should be combining resources with the EU to fight Covid-19? The EU asked us to do so, on the basis that they'll gladly take our money but: would WE not have had any say in which vaccines to procure, at what price or in what quantity and to what delivery schedule. We would not be able to negotiate with a company the commission is negotiating with. We would have to stop our own negotiations if the EU started negotiating with a manufacturer we were already negotiating with. And, we'd be 28th out of 28 Nations once distribution commenced - as we're no longer part of the bloc. link blueworks both ways. it's either a free trade deal or WTO rules. WTO rules hurt the bloc more than the UK as they sell more to us than we sell to them. it's in the EU interests to do a deal. 9 major motor companies in Germany, France, Italy & Spain and French, Italian and Spanish food and drink manufacturers - all will be keen to avoid tariffs. Can you imagine how much they will lose once the UK seals trade deals with non-EU countries for similar products? There's plenty of countries out there just waiting to do business. Please now, do us both a favour: don't quote me again. I have no interest in prolonging this. you're clearly a died-in-the-wool Europhile and that's ok. but i, along with 17,410,741 others (the highest turnout for anything ever in the UK) have more faith in the UK to stand on its own two feet, forge it's own path and succeed on its own merit. |
Nathan H 29.09.2020 11:37 |
Nah don't worry I'm not going to come back again I only originally wanted to put my points and represent what a good fraction of people believe in. Anyway I shouldn't have written anything because I didn't really have the time to lol. (P.S. what if Brexit doesn't succeed? If you haven't done something before you don't really know how it will turn out. Queen didn't know that Bohemian Rhapsody would be successful, they had visions of it doing so but they didn't know until they did it. Personally it's a similar scenario as Brexit, is it worth the risk?) |
Nathan H 04.10.2020 11:22 |
Boris Johnson on Twitter:
|
brENsKi 04.10.2020 16:46 |
Nathan H wrote:Boris Johnson on Twitter:are you seriously that gullible that you fell for this. the twitter account actually says Parody Boris Johnson - it's even visible at the top of the clip you posted!!! c'mon. seriously fella, you kill your liberal-left argument with every new post you make. |
Nathan H 08.10.2020 11:26 |
brENsKi wrote:Of course I knew it was a parody - I was only having a laugh. Am I not allowed to say my own opinion as you are coming across now as a dictator. I can do whatever I want to thank you very much. You're not my boss.Nathan H wrote:Boris Johnson on Twitter:are you seriously that gullible that you fell for this. the twitter account actually says Parody Boris Johnson - it's even visible at the top of the clip you posted!!! c'mon. seriously fella, you kill your liberal-left argument with every new post you make. I'll tell you something I'm not really left-wing at all, I'm central pretty much. I disagree a lot with what Labour say as I do with what Tories say. |
brENsKi 08.10.2020 13:22 |
Nathan H wrote:Of course I knew it was a parody - I was only having a laugh. Am I not allowed to say my own opinion as you are coming across now as a dictator. I can do whatever I want to thank you very much. You're not my boss. I'll tell you something I'm not really left-wing at all, I'm central pretty much. I disagree a lot with what Labour say as I do with what Tories say.then why head the twitter repost with your own comment: Boris Johnson On Twitter only two reasons: 1. you didn't realise it was a parody, or 2. like most of the UK left wing - you like to try to smear anyone who doesn't hold your views. and what better way than to claim it actually was Boris. play the game fairly - or don't play at all. |
Nathan H 08.10.2020 22:15 |
brENsKi wrote: then why head the twitter repost with your own comment: Boris Johnson On Twitter only two reasons: 1. you didn't realise it was a parody, or 2. like most of the UK left wing - you like to try to smear anyone who doesn't hold your views. and what better way than to claim it actually was Boris. play the game fairly - or don't play at all.Of course I knew it was a parody I've been following it for months. I'm not a thick person for your knowledge, I've got nine GCSEs, two A-Levels and a BTEC subsidiary diploma. I've passed every qualification I've ever done, first time. I just find some really good points made from the account. This particular one was one of the more jokey ones. I follow a Keir Starmer one too but I haven't seen one which is appropriate for this particular thread. Just because you don't like it doesn't mean it should be banned from here. In my opinion you're the one that needs to play the game fairly - allow other people's opinions and stop acting like a dictator. You're going to win if I stop responding and that will support the fact that Tories always win by allowing less freedom. (Honestly though I'm just left of centre in the political spectrum so to call me left-wing is insulting. I voted for the first time last year as I was the right age to and I didn't vote Labour.) |
Nathan H 08.10.2020 22:19 |
This parody account really does make some good points based on proper evidence. Just look at this:
|
brENsKi 09.10.2020 09:28 |
Nathan H wrote:it's got nothing to do with not responding/winning - and absolutely nothing to do with dictating. the post was funny. what is wrong with it is you did exactly what those currently telling us how to think, do.brENsKi wrote: then why head the twitter repost with your own comment: Boris Johnson On Twitter only two reasons: 1. you didn't realise it was a parody, or 2. like most of the UK left wing - you like to try to smear anyone who doesn't hold your views. and what better way than to claim it actually was Boris. play the game fairly - or don't play at all.Just because you don't like it doesn't mean it should be banned from here. In my opinion you're the one that needs to play the game fairly - allow other people's opinions and stop acting like a dictator. You're going to win if I stop responding and that will support the fact that Tories always win by allowing less freedom. you tried to pass it off as Boris Johnson on Twitter. at least the original twitter account clearly said Parody Boris Johnson. but you felt the need to repost it here as Boris Johnson on Twitter . why do that? what's the point? other than to try and con people that it was Boris? if you can't see what is wrong with that then it's you who has the problem - but you'll fit in very nicely with Carole Cadwalladr, Laura Kuenssberg, Katherine Viner, Kevin Maguire, Pippa Crerar and all of the other left-wing myth-purveyors - who know what the truth is, but would rather sell the public a steady diet of crap. as i said Play Fairly. |
Nathan H 09.10.2020 13:24 |
brENsKi wrote: it's got nothing to do with not responding/winning - and absolutely nothing to do with dictating. the post was funny. what is wrong with it is you did exactly what those currently telling us how to think, do. you tried to pass it off as Boris Johnson on Twitter. at least the original twitter account clearly said Parody Boris Johnson. but you felt the need to repost it here as Boris Johnson on Twitter . why do that? what's the point? other than to try and con people that it was Boris? if you can't see what is wrong with that then it's you who has the problem - but you'll fit in very nicely with Carole Cadwalladr, Laura Kuenssberg, Katherine Viner, Kevin Maguire, Pippa Crerar and all of the other left-wing myth-purveyors - who know what the truth is, but would rather sell the public a steady diet of crap. as i said Play Fairly.Dictating? Anyone who is democratic wouldn't be bossing people around like you have been to me. Am I not allowed to say my own opinion on anything? Please answer You must've actually believed it as you are taking this very seriously. Judging by what you've said I deserve to go to prison. You seriously have a problem with anyone who doesn't agree with you. How on Earth could have I said my original point on Brexit without you being incredibly rude and going of in a tangent? Please answer |
brENsKi 09.10.2020 14:17 |
Nathan H wrote:wtf are you talking about? unlike you i can read and understand what the word "parody" means. prison? where have i implied that? your reactions are so far-left "woe is me, stop persecuting me" - you're unbelievable.brENsKi wrote: it's got nothing to do with not responding/winning - and absolutely nothing to do with dictating. the post was funny. what is wrong with it is you did exactly what those currently telling us how to think, do. you tried to pass it off as Boris Johnson on Twitter. at least the original twitter account clearly said Parody Boris Johnson. but you felt the need to repost it here as Boris Johnson on Twitter . why do that? what's the point? other than to try and con people that it was Boris? if you can't see what is wrong with that then it's you who has the problem - but you'll fit in very nicely with Carole Cadwalladr, Laura Kuenssberg, Katherine Viner, Kevin Maguire, Pippa Crerar and all of the other left-wing myth-purveyors - who know what the truth is, but would rather sell the public a steady diet of crap. as i said Play Fairly.Dictating? Anyone who is democratic wouldn't be bossing people around like you have been to me. Am I not allowed to say my own opinion on anything? Please answer You must've actually believed it as you are taking this very seriously. Judging by what you've said I deserve to go to prison. You seriously have a problem with anyone who doesn't agree with you. How on Earth could have I said my original point on Brexit without you being incredibly rude and going of in a tangent? Please answer no i won't answer your (latest) question. you don't get to demand what i reply to - especially when you have spent the last few posts diverting away from my question about your post. no one is bossing you around. if you are unable to see that adding an unnecessary heading to your post: Boris Johnson On Twitter - to make it look like he actually said it, is wrong, then you do have a problem. your post could've been honest - something like "found this funny post on twitter" - but no, you couldn't be honest. instead you had to distort things with your heading: Boris Johnson On Twitter puerile stuff. you're the one taking it seriously. you keep coming back - moving the goalposts of your argument...another thing the extreme left are known for: lose an argument, veer off on another tangent. you can't be reasoned with - again another extreme left characteristic. you can claim to be centre-left all you like, but you bear the traits of the extreme left. if you stayed on topic and reasoned within the subject that'd be different...i'd be happy to stay and reason with you. you do nothing of the sort. you divert, deflect and flit from any useless straw to the next - clutching wildly as your argument sinks further and further. argue with yourself from now on - at least you have a 50/50 chance of winning that, albeit losing in the same process. you really can have the last word here - it'll be like all your previous replies - a diversion into some other unrelated blind alley. so, with that i'm out. |
Nathan H 09.10.2020 15:53 |
Most of the things I say are credited or are views shared or stated on several news outlets. The stuff you say is really just your hatred to people who disagree with you politically. You're avoiding some of my credible points because you know I'm right and you're wrong. I've seen you do it to many other people on here, you don't like a point someone makes and then you try manipulating the person to make it seem like they are the bad ones. Finally, you're the one who keeps coming back. You didn't had to respond to points I make out of nowhere but you do because you don't like reading someone which you disagree with. If you try to deny that then explain. |
AlbaNo1 12.10.2020 18:45 |
Nathan H wrote: Most of the things I say are credited or are views shared or stated on several news outlets. The stuff you say is really just your hatred to people who disagree with you politically. You're avoiding some of my credible points because you know I'm right and you're wrong. I've seen you do it to many other people on here, you don't like a point someone makes and then you try manipulating the person to make it seem like they are the bad ones. Finally, you're the one who keeps coming back. You didn't had to respond to points I make out of nowhere but you do because you don't like reading someone which you disagree with. If you try to deny that then explain.A very insightful appraisal of this particular poster. I cannot fathom how this has not been more commonly expressed. |