| goose44 29.01.2015 21:15 |
These boards are becoming dull and stupid. Same blah blah blah and people attacking one another. There is nothing of substance here these days. Grow up people and be interesting for heavens sake |
| BETA215 29.01.2015 21:19 |
Go to QueenOnline. There you will find fun, joy and interesting conversations. |
| tomchristie22 29.01.2015 22:14 |
goose44 wrote: These boards are becoming dull and stupid. Same blah blah blah and people attacking one another. There is nothing of substance here these days. Grow up people and be interesting for heavens sakeSo start a discussion of substance, rather than hypocritically sniping at the board as a whole. I'd maintain that aside from the recent fiasco, there's a wealth of interesting discussion here. |
| winterspelt 29.01.2015 23:00 |
Dont worry about it, there are lots of us who are trying to avoid the recent events... |
| mooghead 30.01.2015 02:09 |
There is nothing interesting left to talk about. That's the trouble. |
| Costa86 30.01.2015 05:01 |
^This. |
| Sebastian 30.01.2015 05:20 |
The door is open for anyone to enter or leave whenever they feel like it. |
| BETA215 30.01.2015 11:31 |
Now, in a good mood: until Queen releases something new (concert, songs, demos, etc.), there's nothing to talk about. We've covered every problem/situation you can imagine. |
| malicedoom 30.01.2015 14:07 |
We all suck. - Duh. |
| Sheldon 30.01.2015 15:46 |
Just the other day I was thinking about how many interesting topics have been discussed here during the last few months. For the first time in years I have really looked forward to my daily browsing. And not only discussion about the current events, but various topics about the Freddie era and a whole bunch of new perspectives on previously discussed topics. It's certainly not all bad! |
| mooghead 30.01.2015 18:22 |
Yeah but how many topics are truly original and how many belong to the Queen + other person board...?? |
| tomchristie22 30.01.2015 18:22 |
BETA215 wrote: Now, in a good mood: until Queen releases something new (concert, songs, demos, etc.), there's nothing to talk about. We've covered every problem/situation you can imagine.One only needs to listen to c_matt's remixes, for instance, to realise that there's a whole lot we haven't covered, even down to things in song which we simply didn't know were there. |
| Mr.Mouth 30.01.2015 19:49 |
BETA215 wrote: Now, in a good mood: until Queen releases something new (concert, songs, demos, etc.), there's nothing to talk about. We've covered every problem/situation you can imagine.True that |
| The King Of Rhye 30.01.2015 20:17 |
mooghead wrote: Yeah but how many topics are truly original and how many belong to the Queen + other person board...??Is that so crazy, though.....seems perfectly understandable that Queen fans are talking about the current ventures of Queen......whether you like the 'other person' or not...... |
| tomchristie22 31.01.2015 03:00 |
'There's nothing of substance', goose44 complains, before going and starting the threads, 'next queen member to pass away' and 'Queen royal rumble'. |
| brENsKi 31.01.2015 04:24 |
this ^ |
| Mr.Mouth 31.01.2015 09:20 |
goose44 is hillarious...i dont take that guy so sirious when he writtes some upseting things. I think we should cut some slack.. I just laugh and laugh...How can someones jokes upset you..lol |
| gerry 31.01.2015 09:41 |
yes i have been saying this for a long time, life is too short to be bitching and arguing all the time. we all like Queen and so should get along. certain people on this site like attacking others for the sake of it, very childish. Please everyone listen, opinions are only opinions and it would be lovely if we could just for once play nice on here. |
| brENsKi 31.01.2015 09:48 |
gerry wrote: yes i have been saying this for a long time, life is too short to be bitching and arguing all the time. we all like Queen and so should get along. certain people on this site like attacking others for the sake of it, very childish. Please everyone listen, opinions are only opinions and it would be lovely if we could just for once play nice on here.classic heroin addict warning people of the dangers of taking drugs |
| The King Of Rhye 31.01.2015 10:17 |
gerry wrote: yes i have been saying this for a long time, life is too short to be bitching and arguing all the time. we all like Queen and so should get along. certain people on this site like attacking others for the sake of it, very childish. Please everyone listen, opinions are only opinions and it would be lovely if we could just for once play nice on here.HA! The funny part is that you don't realize how funny that is (coming from you).......... |
| Oscar J 31.01.2015 10:34 |
Too funny! |
| gerry 31.01.2015 11:01 |
laugh all you like but at least i had a good up bringing unlike some of the sewage on this thread like Brenski and king of rhye Brenski is just like katie hopkins, he just has to slag me off in every sentence, because his pin head brain doesnt know any better! sad. |
| winterspelt 31.01.2015 11:58 |
The King Of Rhye wrote:True!gerry wrote: yes i have been saying this for a long time, life is too short to be bitching and arguing all the time. we all like Queen and so should get along. certain people on this site like attacking others for the sake of it, very childish. Please everyone listen, opinions are only opinions and it would be lovely if we could just for once play nice on here.HA! The funny part is that you don't realize how funny that is (coming from you).......... LOL |
| gerry 31.01.2015 12:01 |
I DONT GIVE FUCK WHAT YOU THINK, SO TAKE YOUR COMMENTS BACK COS THEY ARE WASTED ON ME. JOG ON WITH YOUR ARSE HOLE BUDDIES ON HERE. |
| *goodco* 31.01.2015 12:10 |
|
| gerry 31.01.2015 12:23 |
My motto, give as good as you get! i take no shit from anyone on this site. |
| k-m 31.01.2015 15:36 |
Haha! Spot on, actually.
mooghead wrote: There is nothing interesting left to talk about. That's the trouble. |
| ludwigs 31.01.2015 15:55 |
gerry wrote: I DONT GIVE FUCK WHAT YOU THINK, SO TAKE YOUR COMMENTS BACK COS THEY ARE WASTED ON ME. JOG ON WITH YOUR ARSE HOLE BUDDIES ON HERE.Then why retaliate (whilst shouting?) My guessing is that this brief 'perusing - leisure activity' site seems to be quite high in your list of 'things to do' in your life? For me it's one of those sites I have a look at and move on. Doesn't enter my real life, day-to-day existence. It's purely a passing thing. If I didn't look for 2 weeks, my life would still go on. It's a damn forum where people offer opinions, advice, feelings etc etc....blah, blah. It doesn't matter!!! It's only fairly recently that I have bothered to interact and post. It's not fair though cause there really ARE some small-minded fools that see this place as a BIG factor in their lives! I can take it or leave it. The way things seem to be stalling........it might be quite easy to leave it. Too often saddo's believe this matters at all? It's a fucking forum Gazza!! Get used to it. |
| moonie 31.01.2015 16:15 |
brENsKi wrote:He He.. You Bastard Brenski.. Nice one.. That made me titter mind..gerry wrote: yes i have been saying this for a long time, life is too short to be bitching and arguing all the time. we all like Queen and so should get along. certain people on this site like attacking others for the sake of it, very childish. Please everyone listen, opinions are only opinions and it would be lovely if we could just for once play nice on here.classic heroin addict warning people of the dangers of taking drugs |
| BETA215 31.01.2015 16:41 |
brenski, you are one of my QueenZone comments hero. |
| gerry 01.02.2015 03:33 |
YEAH BRENSKI IS A FIRST CLASS BASTARD THATS WHY HE IS A PRISON GUARD. = CUNT. |
| brENsKi 01.02.2015 06:09 |
gerry wrote: YEAH BRENSKI IS A FIRST CLASS BASTARD THATS WHY HE IS A PRISON GUARD. = CUNT.I am NOT a prison guard - i NEVER have been a prison guard. I worked in prisons - but you're so fucking incredibly thick that you didn't realise that there are other jobs in prisons besides that of "guard". You also knew i previously said i retired from working in the prison service. But YOU keep typing this shit because it somehow amuses you to spout Gezza Shactoids. And btw - if all you have as a means of retort is the word "cunt" - then poor you.... The twin towns of Moronica and Shactoidberg are in disarray - common sense is beginning to break out during your absence. They're missing their King....you'd better hurry back and restore [backward] normality |
| gerry 01.02.2015 06:28 |
You worked in prisons as the bum boy that you are! i bet the whole in your arse is a big as the whole in your gob! |
| The King Of Rhye 01.02.2015 06:47 |
Homophobic insults now? Really? |
| gerry 01.02.2015 07:28 |
not homophobic insults, but just directed at Brenski because he knows he is a bastard and does not give me a chance, he is always picking fault with everything that i discuss. He is one nasty self conceited arrogant flippant twat. If this thing is married i feel so so sorry for his wife and family. |
| brENsKi 01.02.2015 08:01 |
gerry wrote: ***************************************************************************************************************above quote from Gerry removed by myself from request by YourValentine. It appears our resident pigeon-shouter is no more. |
| Oscar J 01.02.2015 12:11 |
Not true. His other accounts are still here - Rugby guy for example. |
| winterspelt 01.02.2015 16:20 |
brENsKi wrote:=)gerry wrote: ***************************************************************************************************************above quote from Gerry removed by myself from request by YourValentine. It appears our resident pigeon-shouter is no more. Oscar J wrote: Not true. His other accounts are still here - Rugby guy for example.=( Yeah, there's another one: Queen2 and there was another one that I cant remember... And I would not be surprised if he already have a new account... |
| inu-liger 01.02.2015 17:24 |
About time that crack head was removed. Long overdue! Good riddance. |
| brENsKi 01.02.2015 18:23 |
winterspelt wrote:you're absolutely right.brENsKi wrote:=)gerry wrote: **************************************************************************************************************above quote from Gerry removed by myself from request by YourValentine. It appears our resident pigeon-shouter is no more.Oscar J wrote: Not true. His other accounts are still here - Rugby guy for example.=( Yeah, there's another one: Queen2 and there was another one that I cant remember... And I would not be surprised if he already have a new account... aside from any new logins these are the known ones Gerry used 1] Gerry 2] rugby_guy 3] Mr Music 4] Queen2 be nice if these could be banned and the iP blocked eh? because it's one thing disagreeing or even arguing the fucking toss vehemently (and i should know)...but using discriminatory language and terms is another |
| inu-liger 01.02.2015 18:42 |
Report them to YourValentine then if you suspect these are his aliases. |
| tero! 48531 01.02.2015 22:58 |
inu-liger wrote: Report them to YourValentine then if you suspect these are his aliases.Can we also report you when you call other posters crack heads, or spread runours of their mental ilnessess? |
| inu-liger 01.02.2015 23:05 |
tero! 48531 wrote:Go ahead. Really. DO go ahead and try.inu-liger wrote: Report them to YourValentine then if you suspect these are his aliases.Can we also report you when you call other posters crack heads, or spread runours of their mental ilnessess? I can guarantee you however I'm not going anywhere, so don't get your hopes up high, because unlike most all the people that have been banned to date, I have actually CONTRIBUTED to the Queen fandom in various useful ways, as I've recently reiterated in full detail to dearly departed Gezza The Ignoramus. |
| tero! 48531 01.02.2015 23:12 |
inu-liger wrote: Go ahead. Really. DO go ahead and try. I can guarantee you however I'm not going anywhere, so don't get your hopes up high, because unlike most all the people that have been banned to date, I have actually CONTRIBUTED to the Queen fandom in various useful ways, as I've recently reiterated in full detail to dearly departed Gezza The Ignoramus.Contributing into the Queen world doesn't mean you should be outside the rules. Do YOU think it means that you are free to do anything you like, insult other people, and spread nasty rumours about them, just because you have shared something? If you want QZ to be a civilised message board, YOU also have to be civilised. |
| inu-liger 02.02.2015 01:16 |
tero! 48531 wrote: If you want QZ to be a civilised message board, YOU also have to be civilised.You're one to talk! And by the way, my "crack head" comment was not a crack at trying to suggest any literal drug usage by that idiot. If you would bother to actually read things in context instead of always trying to find a way to be a dick in your postings lately, you'd have realized my comment was directed at Gezza's way of communicating ignorantly with people and how he acts so brazenly. Stop reading into my posts so literally. |
| brENsKi 02.02.2015 01:17 |
there is a huge difference between arguing the toss and using discriminatory language. you were NOT privy to what went on, what Gerry said etc..you have no idea what actually brought about HIS removal - so stop making judgmental comparisons when you're not in a position to do so. i removed his quote from my post at moderator's request - that should give you an idea of the nature of what was said that resulted in his removal. but don't worry...you won't have to lament his absence too long...he'll be using one of his other IDs (rugby_guy Mr Music Queen2) any moment |
| tero! 48531 02.02.2015 04:33 |
My point is perfectly valid, whether you like it or not. You two were perfectly happy provoke Gerry, and to deliberately lower the level of discussion on QZ in the process. But hey, it's alright as long as you remember to share a bootleg recording every now and then! |
| brENsKi 02.02.2015 07:23 |
tero! 48531 wrote: My point is perfectly valid, whether you like it or not. You two were perfectly happy provoke Gerry, and to deliberately lower the level of discussion on QZ in the process. But hey, it's alright as long as you remember to share a bootleg recording every now and then!no. you are wrong. in a nutshell you prove you are incapable of distinguishing between argument and homophobic abuse. Gerry refused to ever have any of his "facts" amended or corrected by many people who knew the facts. when corrected he then proceeded to be abusive to people. and any person would then react in kind. btw - just because YOU didn't actually see the discriminatory post he made - doesn't mean his banning wasn't justified. there's a huge difference between posting provocational msgs and posting discriminatory msgs. his post was hugely discriminatory - and in the outside world he'd have been arrested for it. In fact, people HAVE been arrested and charged on twitter for the same. the mods did exactly the right thing. have to wonder why you would seek to defend someone who quite clearly was unashamedly homophobic - and proved this when his guard dropped. he wasn't banned for using the c*** word. he was banned for discriminatory comments stop defending the indefensible. |
| tero! 48531 02.02.2015 09:09 |
brENsKi wrote: no. you are wrong. in a nutshell you prove you are incapable of distinguishing between argument and homophobic abuse.Did I ever say that he wasn't homophobe, and when exactly was the last time I have defended him in any way? (I think you can find a neutral message defending him from your intentional provocations, but that's it.) You took justice into your own hand provoking the argument, instead of raising the level of discussion. It makes you almost (if not just) as bad as Gerry, even if it's in a different way. If there's anything wrong the majority of posters on QZ, it's the fact that they are more interested in petty personal squabbles instead of constructing rational arguments. |
| brENsKi 02.02.2015 11:29 |
you are being a dick.
"we" (the people you accuse of bullying him) have tried reasoning over the last six months....but in every single discussion all he ever understands is argument...and insults.
also - if he had retained even a granule of the brains he was born with he may have realised that when I said i worked as an Equality Manager - that perhaps this was the right time to check his own comments - or at least edit his own thoughts before putting them out there.
fwiw - i have never called him a cunt. something he seems to love calling everyone.
tero! 48531 wrote:You took justice into your own hand provoking the argument, instead of raising the level of discussion. It makes you almost (if not just) as bad as Gerry, even if it's in a different way.ffs - instead of assuming what went on try reading it. and as for having him removed? No - and don't even hint at suggesting it either. I suggested that the comment he made be removed - nothing more. Mods took the decision to remove him also. you're starting to sound like Gerry. and in the interests of peace and love - i'm not arguing this any further - i know i did no wrong. you can have the last word. i know you will. do yourself a huge favour - before you make a bigger fool of yourself. read this thread from last week - examine just how much I and others tried to reason with him...and then accept how futile reasoning with him is link |
| inu-liger 02.02.2015 14:21 |
Tero, I hope you are not seriously trying to step up the game to try and take Gerry's place. We do not need any more of that type of garbage, thank you very much. |
| Saint Jiub 02.02.2015 20:51 |
So now any one who disagrees with the lords of QZ automatically is the next "Gerry". Brilliant |
| BETA215 02.02.2015 20:56 |
Panchgani wrote: So now any one who disagrees with the lords of QZ automatically is the next "Gerry". Brilliant "Tero, I hope you are not seriously trying to step up the game to try and take Gerry's place. We do not need any more of that type of garbage, thank you very much." He never said: "Tero, I hope you shut your mouth, you are taking Gerry's place. Don't do it, we do not need any more of that type of garbage, thank you very much." Stop victimizing yourself. |
| inu-liger 02.02.2015 21:20 |
Beta, he has been following me here and there in just about any topic that somehow involves the obvious issues that we will never agree to see eye to eye on and always trying to find a convenient excuse to paint me exclusively as a bad guy any way that he can, and this has been going on for up to a few years now, especially when he was part of the trio who tried to gang up and bully me off the website for some time (only to earn serious rebukes from YV along the way) when the Fuller/Fanthology fracas first happened. I don't expect him to stop the irrational self-victimization anytime soon, although it would certainly be appreciated the sooner that that would happen - but I won't be holding my breath. |
| Saint Jiub 02.02.2015 21:35 |
inu-liger wrote: Beta, he has been following me here and there in just about any topic that somehow involves the obvious issues that we will never agree to see eye to eye on and always trying to find a convenient excuse to paint me exclusively as a bad guy any way that he can, and this has been going on for up to a few years now, especially when he was part of the trio who tried to gang up and bully me off the website for some time (only to earn serious rebukes from YV along the way) when the Fuller/Fanthology fracas first happened. I don't expect him to stop the irrational self-victimization anytime soon, although it would certainly be appreciated the sooner that that would happen - but I won't be holding my breath.Have you been granted moderator powers yet? I wonder why? |
| *goodco* 02.02.2015 22:21 |
sigh........and to think that this place was so peaceful for a couple of hours after the wall hit the fan..... |
| BETA215 02.02.2015 22:41 |
Panchgani wrote:inu-liger wrote: Beta, he has been following me here and there in just about any topic that somehow involves the obvious issues that we will never agree to see eye to eye on and always trying to find a convenient excuse to paint me exclusively as a bad guy any way that he can, and this has been going on for up to a few years now, especially when he was part of the trio who tried to gang up and bully me off the website for some time (only to earn serious rebukes from YV along the way) when the Fuller/Fanthology fracas first happened. I don't expect him to stop the irrational self-victimization anytime soon, although it would certainly be appreciated the sooner that that would happen - but I won't be holding my breath.Have you been granted moderator powers yet? I wonder why? Because Richard is busy playing Super Mario 3D Land in his New Nintendo 3DS. It's none of your business, dude. |
| inu-liger 03.02.2015 11:59 |
Correction: I only got a DS Lite recently (used for $50 but in great condition, which is not bad at all) But nice guess there Beta :) |
| thomasquinn 32989 03.02.2015 12:15 |
Panchgani wrote:inu-liger wrote: Beta, he has been following me here and there in just about any topic that somehow involves the obvious issues that we will never agree to see eye to eye on and always trying to find a convenient excuse to paint me exclusively as a bad guy any way that he can, and this has been going on for up to a few years now, especially when he was part of the trio who tried to gang up and bully me off the website for some time (only to earn serious rebukes from YV along the way) when the Fuller/Fanthology fracas first happened. I don't expect him to stop the irrational self-victimization anytime soon, although it would certainly be appreciated the sooner that that would happen - but I won't be holding my breath.Have you been granted moderator powers yet? I wonder why? Has *anyone* been "granted moderator powers" since this site's early days? No, you say? Gee, Panchgani, doesn't that kind of make your attempted jab sound rather empty and more than a little petty and sad? |
| tero! 48531 03.02.2015 12:44 |
brENsKi wrote: you're starting to sound like Gerry. and in the interests of peace and love - i'm not arguing this any further - i know i did no wrong. you can have the last word. i know you will.If only you would have done the same with Gerry... 1) a troll doesn't carry on without his audience 2) a hot-headed poster doesn't get worked up without provocation 3) a normal poster changes his tone or leaves if nobody answers him "It takes two to tango" as they say, and you did escalate the situation. Even if it wasn't on purpose. |
| tero! 48531 03.02.2015 12:50 |
inu-liger wrote: Tero, I hope you are not seriously trying to step up the game to try and take Gerry's place. We do not need any more of that type of garbage, thank you very much.Sorry to disappoint you, but I'm too busy keeping my own place. ;) You're free to dislike me in the future as well, I don't expect everyone to like this level of directness. |
| brENsKi 03.02.2015 13:18 |
tero! 48531 wrote:nice of you to blame everyone else for Gerry's behaviour - everyone except himself that is.....ONLY one person responsible for Gerry behaving the way he did - and that's Gerry.brENsKi wrote: you're starting to sound like Gerry. and in the interests of peace and love - i'm not arguing this any further - i know i did no wrong. you can have the last word. i know you will.If only you would have done the same with Gerry... 1) a troll doesn't carry on without his audience 2) a hot-headed poster doesn't get worked up without provocation 3) a normal poster changes his tone or leaves if nobody answers him "It takes two to tango" as they say, and you did escalate the situation. Even if it wasn't on purpose. he'll love your unconditional support, no doubt. - well his new ID (Champagne Freddie) will |
| tero! 48531 03.02.2015 13:38 |
brENsKi wrote: ONLY one person responsible for Gerry behaving the way he did - and that's Gerry.Come on, let's be honest here! QZ would be a boring place if you had nobody to spar with, and you got your a kick out of his reactions. Communication and responses are the whole point of this place, or otherwise we could all just cancel our messages before posting them. |
| inu-liger 03.02.2015 14:40 |
Tero, there's sparring, and then there is being just a negative asshole towards everybody for little to no justifiable reason, the latter which is where Gerry fell from the beginning. You could say most of us have ended up sparring with him IF for the fact we have tried to reason with him and point out where he was wrong, and YET he insisted on staying his course of self-victimization even worse than Panchgani has (by a factor of two to three times at least) while ignoring the fact checking that was repeatedly being pointed out to him - and never apologizing for his wrongdoing ever. |
| tero! 48531 03.02.2015 23:28 |
inu-liger wrote: Tero, there's sparring, and then there is being just a negative asshole towards everybody for little to no justifiable reason, the latter which is where Gerry fell from the beginning. You could say most of us have ended up sparring with him IF for the fact we have tried to reason with him and point out where he was wrong, and YET he insisted on staying his course of self-victimization even worse than Panchgani has (by a factor of two to three times at least) while ignoring the fact checking that was repeatedly being pointed out to him - and never apologizing for his wrongdoing ever.I don't deny him being a negative asshole, but at the same time I aknowledge that your "reasoning" is what intensified his responses. Maybe you don't see it, but you're doing the same exact thing with Panchgani right now. Casually dropping his name and belittling him in unreated conversations, and then expect that he doesn't get worked up when you actually do respond to him directly. If you want to provoke responses, you also have to accept that you might not like all of them! |
| BETA215 04.02.2015 00:07 |
inu-liger wrote: Correction: I only got a DS Lite recently (used for $50 but in great condition, which is not bad at all) But nice guess there Beta :) Me too! I have a DS Lite (blue) which costed me a leg and an eye in 2011 + an R4i SDHC and a EZ-Flash 3in1 Expansion Pack (to play GBA games, it's like a rumble pak, and a memory pak for homebrews and emulators). If you like, I can recommend you some games. |
| BETA215 04.02.2015 00:16 |
tero! 48531 wrote: If you want to provoke responses, you also have to accept that you might not like all of them! For the sake of your mom in tangas! He NEVER, but NEVER, wanted to provoke this crazy conversation. Are you out of your mind? |
| BETA215 04.02.2015 00:22 |
tero! 48531 wrote:inu-liger wrote: Report them to YourValentine then if you suspect these are his aliases.Can we also report you when you call other posters crack heads, or spread runours of their mental ilnessess? Can you see? This is your first comment. He never provoked you. |
| inu-liger 04.02.2015 01:35 |
tero! 48531 wrote:I don't deny him being a negative assholeFinally, something we can agree on. but at the same time I aknowledge that your "reasoning" is what intensified his responses.It intensified his responses because with the way his mind works, and I think the good majority of the board here would agree with me on this, ANY response that didn't toe the line according to his views were nasty nasty nasty responses that he chose to believe were conveniently vilifying him somehow. Even those which pointed out for instance the numerous times he intentionally misquoted or misattributed things to various users here. If this is the product of a very narcissistic personality in Gerry's real life, the above truly would not surprise me then. I really think Gerry should seek some professional counseling, for his own sake. One thing I will point out is that, unlike Gerry I actually have apologized on numerous occasions where I let my responses get to be too much and admit wrongdoing. He has not once to my knowledge ever done the same. If he has, I would love to be proven wrong. Maybe you don't see it, but you're doing the same exact thing with Panchgani right now. Casually dropping his name and belittling him in unreated conversations, and then expect that he doesn't get worked up when you actually do respond to him directly.Let's conveniently ignore the fact he has also been guilty of the same, time and time over again. If anything I've been holding BACK and biting my tongue even when namedropping him, and he knows based on past experience what truly nasty things I could repeatedly say towards him. If you want to provoke responses, you also have to accept that you might not like all of them!I wasn't born yesterday, you know. No need to patronize me with your redundancy. |
| The Real Wizard 04.02.2015 02:23 |
I can't believe this moron is still being discussed in his absence. Which is probably exactly what he wanted. Mission accomplished? |
| tero! 48531 04.02.2015 13:15 |
inu-liger wrote: Let's conveniently ignore the fact he has also been guilty of the same, time and time over again. If anything I've been holding BACK and biting my tongue even when namedropping him, and he knows based on past experience what truly nasty things I could repeatedly say towards him.I guess this will sound patronizing again, but you do actually have an alternative way to act. You don't HAVE to respond to him. You don't even have to respond to me. The same arguments aren't going to be repeated, unless there is something to provoke their re-appearance. It's up to you whether you want to provoke them or not. |
| inu-liger 04.02.2015 14:14 |
tero! 48531 wrote: The same arguments aren't going to be repeated, unless there is something to provoke their re-appearance. It's up to you whether you want to provoke them or not.So is this advice you're going to adhere to as well when it comes to for instance the collectors debate as well? Particularly where it concerns that last bit. Just saying, but if you're going to dole out advice, I'd hope you yourself also learn to act on it as well. |
| The Real Wizard 04.02.2015 14:43 |
inu-liger wrote:Fat chance. Without hypocrisy and ignorance he wouldn't have a basis of existence on this forum.tero! 48531 wrote: The same arguments aren't going to be repeated, unless there is something to provoke their re-appearance. It's up to you whether you want to provoke them or not.So is this advice you're going to adhere to as well when it comes to for instanxe the collectors debate as well? Particularly where it concerns that last bit. Just saying, but if you're going to dole out advice, I'd hope you yourself also learn to act on it as well. |
| tero! 48531 04.02.2015 23:24 |
inu-liger wrote: So is this advice you're going to adhere to as well when it comes to for instanxe the collectors debate as well? Particularly where it concerns that last bit. Just saying, but if you're going to dole out advice, I'd hope you yourself also learn to act on it as well.I AM taking that advice all the time. I openly admit that I am here for the sole purpose of stimulating a discussion. I'm not here to talk to myself, you know. ;) After my message it's YOUR turn to decide whether you want to continue with that discussion, or focus on some other which you find more positive or inspiring. There's absolutely no hypocrisy or double standard included. |