| Treasure Moment 06.10.2008 15:44 |
Check it out if you want, its instrumental, its called "Remembering the past" link |
| -fatty- 2850 06.10.2008 15:50 |
I'm editing this because I made a sarcastic comment without actually listening to the song. I had originally said that it sounded like the pap you hear in elevators. In actual fact it's good enough to be the pap that's played on a low quality wedding video. Keep up the good work TM. |
| QueenMercury46 06.10.2008 15:54 |
I fell asleep after the first three seconds. |
| Treasure Moment 06.10.2008 16:05 |
fatty wrote: I'm editing this because I made a sarcastic comment without actually listening to the song. I had originally said that it sounded like the pap you hear in elevators. In actual fact it's good enough to be the pap that's played on a low quality wedding video. Keep up the good work TM. haha thats just something my brother came up with last night. |
| pittrek 06.10.2008 16:08 |
When will you finally stop making SOUNDS and start making MUSIC ? You write that you like metal, but I haven't heard a single song from you which would remind me on metal. |
| Treasure Moment 06.10.2008 16:11 |
pittrek wrote: When will you finally stop making SOUNDS and start making MUSIC ? You write that you like metal, but I haven't heard a single song from you which would remind me on metal. well "transition" is pretty metal dont you think? right now there is no singer, thats why these songs dont have vocals. Its not really sounds if you think about it, for example take a Queen song and listen to it without vocals like who wants to live forever, would you consider it as sound and not music? |
| QueenMercury46 06.10.2008 16:16 |
Funny how you always accuse your brother as the culprit of creating all your worst songs. |
| Treasure Moment 06.10.2008 16:18 |
QueenMercury46 wrote: Funny how you always accuse your brother as the culprit of creating all your worst songs. Actually he makes the best songs. |
| Micrówave 06.10.2008 16:23 |
I had to go to the bathroom today also. Same results. |
| LozIan 06.10.2008 16:24 |
Sounds psychotically syrupy. Apparently including emotion in your music involves being tonally obvious and superficially tear-in-eye. Thanks for giving me the option to check it out, though. If you had commanded me to investigate your new song, I would have steered clear. |
| Major Tom 06.10.2008 16:37 |
My oh my...why don't you listen to Derek Sherinian and learn something about how to make synth-instrumentals? This is BOOORING! |
| Treasure Moment 06.10.2008 16:39 |
Dr. Pepper(The Spiceman) wrote: My oh my...why don't you listen to Derek Sherinian and learn something about how to make synth-instrumentals? This is BOOORING! If this is boring then i guess songs like Bijou and other songs that freddie did are boring too. We have different kinds of songs, some are like this, some are more rock/metal. |
| Major Tom 06.10.2008 17:25 |
No, Bijou is not boring. If you could produce something half as good as that particular song, I'd listen to it. But you need to do something else, something new. We've heard that suff before. Try to finish something. And to name a song Freddie Mercury is just foolish. Then to repeat: Freddie Mercury, Freddie Mercury, Freddie Mercury...is even more foolish. |
| Treasure Moment 06.10.2008 17:29 |
Dr. Pepper(The Spiceman) wrote: No, Bijou is not boring. If you could produce something half as good as that particular song, I'd listen to it. But you need to do something else, something new. We've heard that suff before. Try to finish something. And to name a song Freddie Mercury is just foolish. Then to repeat: Freddie Mercury, Freddie Mercury, Freddie Mercury...is even more foolish. we actually have songs that are euqally good as bijou but you would never admit it even if it was so :P the freddie mercury song is actually very good and it fits to repeat freddie, you have to hear it to understand. |
| Major Tom 06.10.2008 17:37 |
How can you say that you've got songs equally good as "Bijou"? Then LET US HEAR IT, shut us up! Belive me when I say, if you post a song EQUALLY GOOD as even the shittiest Freddie song, I'd be VERY surprised. |
| Treasure Moment 06.10.2008 17:53 |
Dr. Pepper(The Spiceman) wrote: How can you say that you've got songs equally good as "Bijou"? Then LET US HEAR IT, shut us up! Belive me when I say, if you post a song EQUALLY GOOD as even the shittiest Freddie song, I'd be VERY surprised. hah as if you would EVER admit it! all that matters is that we know how good it is and nothing negative you say can change that. |
| its_a_hard_life 26994 06.10.2008 17:55 |
METAL |
| inu-liger 06.10.2008 22:18 |
TREASURE MOMENT TRIED TO KILL THE METAL YOU CAN'T KILL THE METAL! .....oh wait, he did. |
| john bodega 07.10.2008 00:06 |
Alright, new TM song! (hi-fives you guys) Dude, don't worry about not having a singer. Just get the guy that sang "Warrior". I STILL want a copy of that song. |
| pittrek 07.10.2008 03:36 |
Treasure Moment wrote: pittrek wrote: When will you finally stop making SOUNDS and start making MUSIC ? You write that you like metal, but I haven't heard a single song from you which would remind me on metal. well "transition" is pretty metal dont you think? right now there is no singer, thats why these songs dont have vocals. Its not really sounds if you think about it, for example take a Queen song and listen to it without vocals like who wants to live forever, would you consider it as sound and not music? Good question, actually. I consider personally Forever a melody, not a song but it really depends only on your understanding of these terms. |
| Sweetie 07.10.2008 07:43 |
Treasure Moment wrote: Dr. Pepper(The Spiceman) wrote: How can you say that you've got songs equally good as "Bijou"? Then LET US HEAR IT, shut us up! Belive me when I say, if you post a song EQUALLY GOOD as even the shittiest Freddie song, I'd be VERY surprised. hah as if you would EVER admit it! all that matters is that we know how good it is and nothing negative you say can change that. You know, I would admit it. Though honestly your new song gave me a headache because of the synth |
| knakenrudi 07.10.2008 16:06 |
The chord progression was very, very predictable. I play these sort of things when I'm bored. |
| Treasure Moment 07.10.2008 16:30 |
knakenrudi wrote: The chord progression was very, very predictable. I play these sort of things when I'm bored. oh really? im VERY interested to hear the things you play when you are bored, post! |
| knakenrudi 07.10.2008 16:34 |
Treasure Moment wrote: knakenrudi wrote: The chord progression was very, very predictable. I play these sort of things when I'm bored. oh really? im VERY interested to hear the things you play when you are bored, post! I don't consider them worthy enough to be recorded, actually, so I don't bother. |
| knakenrudi 07.10.2008 16:38 |
Next to that, I'll only consider posting anything after I've seen your 'gig in front of thousands of people' video. |
| Treasure Moment 07.10.2008 17:09 |
knakenrudi wrote: Next to that, I'll only consider posting anything after I've seen your 'gig in front of thousands of people' video. it wasnt in front of thousands, it was just on a big stage, the same one as i posted the other "artist" playing on. Also if you think that song was boring and predictable then i cant even imagine what you think about the amateur shitty 3 chord music that the new generation rock bands play. |
| inu-liger 07.10.2008 18:59 |
Treasure Moment wrote: knakenrudi wrote: Next to that, I'll only consider posting anything after I've seen your 'gig in front of thousands of people' video. it wasnt in front of thousands, it was just on a big stage, the same one as i posted the other "artist" playing on. Also if you think that song was boring and predictable then i cant even imagine what you think about the amateur shitty 3 chord music that the new generation rock bands play. You're a fucking liar, TM. You SAID yourself you would be playing on that stage, IN FRONT OF "thousands of people", and you said so yourself weeks ago. Did the turnout turn out to be so disappointly low that you backtracked on your initial promotion and are now pretending you never said that as a result? Fuckwit. I could be a hell of a lot more honest from the beginning when it becomes to my band and STICK with what's been said, longer than just two days. |
| inu-liger 07.10.2008 19:01 |
Also, by now, I have no reason left to believe there is a video of your supposed recent concert. Not even a shred of photographic evidence. Just admit it, you're not a band anymore. You and your brother are basically the new 'Queen+' of Sweden, only you guys are working with mediocre artists to get your face on the TV screen (as if). And that drummer is clearly a low-rate session musician, not a member. You are nothing but C-lebrity wannabes. |
| shoemanbundy 10.10.2008 02:13 |
Why is it there's not a single thing you make that's NOT instrumental?[br] |
| inu-liger 10.10.2008 06:24 |
shoemanbundy wrote: Why is it there's not a single thing you make that's NOT instrumental?[br][br]Simple. He's trying to keep the TM name 'alive' by posting these pieces of boring crap on his MySpace account.[br]Shirley, as long as two remaining members (well, one really - the keyboardist as solo) keep posting new trite on their MySpace account, they're saving face and ensuring that way that "Treasure Moment" still exists as a *band*.[br][br]Easier done that way than taking a simple tape recorder and record a demo as a proper 2-, 3- or 4-piece band and post it online. Takes too much effort it seems for them to write and record material as a group, which seems to be only one song a year, than to take one person and make crap simple melodies and post it under the band name.[br][br][br][br] |
| thomasquinn 32989 10.10.2008 06:32 |
Disregarding the fact that I got bored at 38 seconds and gave up listening a minute and a half, because it was too repetitive (if you insist on using the same chord progression, at least modulate after repeating the A section), it was actually quite good...for TM's standards. However, it wasn't great by a long run:[br][br]- Too highly reliant on triadic arpeggios. That's alright if it's just a backing track, but it either needs a melody line interwoven with the arps, or a separate instrument playing a melody over them (preferably two instruments playing counterpoint, as that'd work rather well over this style of arpeggiating)[br][br]- Too repetitive - very little variation, and the chord progression is not interesting enough to last longer than two repeats without variation.[br][br]- Too little musical tension - few or no points of tension (dissonance), which means that there can also be no release. That's ok in itself, but somehow I feel that it wasn't the intention to make ambient wallpaper music.[br][br]On the upside:[br][br]- The synthesizer support for the piano-line worked well. But that's mainly because it matched the piano in boredom.[br] |
| thomasquinn 32989 10.10.2008 06:46 |
fatty wrote: I'm editing this because I made a sarcastic comment without actually listening to the song. I had originally said that it sounded like the pap you hear in elevators. In actual fact it's good enough to be the pap that's played on a low quality wedding video.[br] [br] Keep up the good work TM.[br]XD[br][br]After giving it a considerable amount of thought, I was able to find one thing I liked about it, though. The synthesizer part was not *completely* obnoxious.[br][br][br][br][br][br] |
| inu-liger 10.10.2008 07:13 |
ThomasQuinn wrote: Disregarding the fact that I got bored at 38 seconds and gave up listening a minute and a half, because it was too repetitive (if you insist on using the same chord progression, at least modulate after repeating the A section), it was actually quite good...for TM's standards. However, it wasn't great by a long run:[br][br]- Too highly reliant on triadic arpeggios. That's alright if it's just a backing track, but it either needs a melody line interwoven with the arps, or a separate instrument playing a melody over them (preferably two instruments playing counterpoint, as that'd work rather well over this style of arpeggiating)[br][br]- Too repetitive - very little variation, and the chord progression is not interesting enough to last longer than two repeats without variation.[br][br]- Too little musical tension - few or no points of tension (dissonance), which means that there can also be no release. That's ok in itself, but somehow I feel that it wasn't the intention to make ambient wallpaper music.[br][br]On the upside:[br][br]- The synthesizer support for the piano-line worked well. But that's mainly because it matched the piano in boredom.[br][br][br]TQ, I applaud you. You've done something TM has failed to ever do: *provide detailed constructive criticism, and reasoning for it all at the same time*[br][br]I'd have done that a long time ago, had I actually taken music lessons, as well as music theory.[br]My musical terminology is very limited :-( |
| Treasure Moment 10.10.2008 08:00 |
ThomasQuinn wrote: Disregarding the fact that I got bored at 38 seconds and gave up listening a minute and a half, because it was too repetitive (if you insist on using the same chord progression, at least modulate after repeating the A section), it was actually quite good...for TM's standards. However, it wasn't great by a long run:[br][br]- Too highly reliant on triadic arpeggios. That's alright if it's just a backing track, but it either needs a melody line interwoven with the arps, or a separate instrument playing a melody over them (preferably two instruments playing counterpoint, as that'd work rather well over this style of arpeggiating)[br][br]- Too repetitive - very little variation, and the chord progression is not interesting enough to last longer than two repeats without variation.[br][br]- Too little musical tension - few or no points of tension (dissonance), which means that there can also be no release. That's ok in itself, but somehow I feel that it wasn't the intention to make ambient wallpaper music.[br][br]On the upside:[br][br]- The synthesizer support for the piano-line worked well. But that's mainly because it matched the piano in boredom.[br][br][br]you talk alot of nonsense! we dont know any music theory but we DO know whats good and what has feeling. With all your knowledge in music theory i doubt you could even write something as good as that song. If you can then POST IT!![br][br][br][br][br] |
| knakenrudi 10.10.2008 08:25 |
Treasure Moment wrote: ThomasQuinn wrote: Disregarding the fact that I got bored at 38 seconds and gave up listening a minute and a half, because it was too repetitive (if you insist on using the same chord progression, at least modulate after repeating the A section), it was actually quite good...for TM's standards. However, it wasn't great by a long run:[br][br]- Too highly reliant on triadic arpeggios. That's alright if it's just a backing track, but it either needs a melody line interwoven with the arps, or a separate instrument playing a melody over them (preferably two instruments playing counterpoint, as that'd work rather well over this style of arpeggiating)[br][br]- Too repetitive - very little variation, and the chord progression is not interesting enough to last longer than two repeats without variation.[br][br]- Too little musical tension - few or no points of tension (dissonance), which means that there can also be no release. That's ok in itself, but somehow I feel that it wasn't the intention to make ambient wallpaper music.[br][br]On the upside:[br][br]- The synthesizer support for the piano-line worked well. But that's mainly because it matched the piano in boredom.[br][br][br]you talk alot of nonsense! we dont know any music theory but we DO know whats good and what has feeling. With all your knowledge in music theory i doubt you could even write something as good as that song. If you can then POST IT!! [br][br]-----------------------------------[br][br]There is little music theory in TQ's excellent post (in any case no 'heavy' or 'difficult' theory). If you ask me, this is just basic and good constructive criticism on how to compose a simple song in a few steps. In any case, if you think that this is already difficult music theory, and you can't work your way round this, than you are the one that doesn't know anything about music.[br] |
| Treasure Moment 10.10.2008 08:51 |
knakenrudi wrote: Treasure Moment wrote: ThomasQuinn wrote: Disregarding the fact that I got bored at 38 seconds and gave up listening a minute and a half, because it was too repetitive (if you insist on using the same chord progression, at least modulate after repeating the A section), it was actually quite good...for TM's standards. However, it wasn't great by a long run:[br][br]- Too highly reliant on triadic arpeggios. That's alright if it's just a backing track, but it either needs a melody line interwoven with the arps, or a separate instrument playing a melody over them (preferably two instruments playing counterpoint, as that'd work rather well over this style of arpeggiating)[br][br]- Too repetitive - very little variation, and the chord progression is not interesting enough to last longer than two repeats without variation.[br][br]- Too little musical tension - few or no points of tension (dissonance), which means that there can also be no release. That's ok in itself, but somehow I feel that it wasn't the intention to make ambient wallpaper music.[br][br]On the upside:[br][br]- The synthesizer support for the piano-line worked well. But that's mainly because it matched the piano in boredom.[br][br][br]you talk alot of nonsense! we dont know any music theory but we DO know whats good and what has feeling. With all your knowledge in music theory i doubt you could even write something as good as that song. If you can then POST IT!! [br][br]-----------------------------------[br][br]There is little music theory in TQ's excellent post (in any case no 'heavy' or 'difficult' theory). If you ask me, this is just basic and good constructive criticism on how to compose a simple song in a few steps. In any case, if you think that this is already difficult music theory, and you can't work your way round this, than you are the one that doesn't know anything about music.[br][br][br][br][br][br][br]As i said, all that nonsense means nothing! that song is NOT easy to come up with, if it is i want to see this thomas post something! do it |
| inu-liger 10.10.2008 09:01 |
Swedefag (yes, that's your new name), the jig's up.[br][br]TQ clearly makes sense. I don't study music theory, yet I can understand what he's talking about.[br][br]You on the other hand are dodging any serious attempts to answer questions sensibly, and by doing so you are further digging yourselves a bigger hole (have you reached Beijing yet?).[br]I don't give a rat's ass anymore what you say. You are clearly NOT a band anymore at this point.[br][br]You're full of lies, lies, lies, and bullshit attempts at making 'rock music'.[br]Your excuses for the supposed video of the alleged recent concert have run out as well. There should have been more than ample time and opportunity to meet your crap drummer to get a copy of the video.[br][br]Just do us a favour and leave this board, and don't come back until you can come with something that even sounds remotely like a band (ie. not a solo person pretending to be a whole band on his own)[br] |
| Poo, again 10.10.2008 09:06 |
I don't know if a certain someone here understands this, but it takes a whole lot of genius to write a 3-chord hit, more so than any" 240 km/h guitar solo + a million chords"-song. |
| inu-liger 10.10.2008 09:12 |
Poo, again wrote: I don't know if a certain someone here understands this, but it takes a whole lot of genius to write a 3-chord hit, more so than any" 240 km/h guitar solo + a million chords"-song.[br]Is that a trick statement? :-)[br][br]If so, you've described virtually every screamo band we unfortunately have to play with sometimes at local shows, or that we've had to sit through at shows we've attended but not played at otherwise.[br][br]Pretty sad, actually...[br][br]Ironically enough though, I'll admit my band had a song, 'Three Chord Progression', which as the name implies was just three chords, repeated over and over till the end (I wasn't a member then, thankfully!).[br]Needless to say, we don't play it anymore (I think it was only played once or twice...? I never heard them play it live *once* since I'd started attending shows in late 2005)[br][br]Our current stuff has gotten a LOT more advanced since then! :-)[br][br]Now if only TM could reach our level, 'that would be a miracle'[br] |
| knakenrudi 10.10.2008 09:17 |
Treasure Moment wrote: knakenrudi wrote: Treasure Moment wrote: [br][br][br]you talk alot of nonsense! we dont know any music theory but we DO know whats good and what has feeling. With all your knowledge in music theory i doubt you could even write something as good as that song. If you can then POST IT!! [br][br]-----------------------------------[br][br]There is little music theory in TQ's excellent post (in any case no 'heavy' or 'difficult' theory). If you ask me, this is just basic and good constructive criticism on how to compose a simple song in a few steps. In any case, if you think that this is already difficult music theory, and you can't work your way round this, than you are the one that doesn't know anything about music.[br][br][br]As i said, all that nonsense means nothing! that song is NOT easy to come up with, if it is i want to see this thomas post something! do it[br][br]------------------------------------[br][br]This song IS easy to come up with. Like I said, hundreds of people with basic piano knowledge and who know a few chords on the piano can improvise these sort of things. I make these things up when I'm bored. Besides that, songs are a lot more than 'chords' or some 'chord progressions'.[br][br]If you want to hear good instrumental music, than study some Bach, or if that is beyond your abilities, look up someone like Leo Kottke on youtube. Two worlds totally apart, but they were the real geniuses. And there are many many more, and you don't belong to them.[br]Maybe they can inspire you in some way. I don't think that by the way, since you consider yourself and you brother already better than them even if you hadn't heard them.[br] |
| inu-liger 10.10.2008 09:54 |
knakenrudi wrote: [br]There is little music theory in TQ's excellent post (in any case no 'heavy' or 'difficult' theory). If you ask me, this is just basic and good constructive criticism on how to compose a simple song in a few steps. In any case, if you think that this is already difficult music theory, and you can't work your way round this, than you are the one that doesn't know anything about music.[br][br][br]TM: OWNED[br] |
| Treasure Moment 10.10.2008 10:25 |
knakenrudi wrote: Treasure Moment wrote: knakenrudi wrote: Treasure Moment wrote: [br][br][br]you talk alot of nonsense! we dont know any music theory but we DO know whats good and what has feeling. With all your knowledge in music theory i doubt you could even write something as good as that song. If you can then POST IT!! [br][br]-----------------------------------[br][br]There is little music theory in TQ's excellent post (in any case no 'heavy' or 'difficult' theory). If you ask me, this is just basic and good constructive criticism on how to compose a simple song in a few steps. In any case, if you think that this is already difficult music theory, and you can't work your way round this, than you are the one that doesn't know anything about music.[br][br][br]As i said, all that nonsense means nothing! that song is NOT easy to come up with, if it is i want to see this thomas post something! do it[br][br]------------------------------------[br][br]This song IS easy to come up with. Like I said, hundreds of people with basic piano knowledge and who know a few chords on the piano can improvise these sort of things. I make these things up when I'm bored. Besides that, songs are a lot more than 'chords' or some 'chord progressions'.[br][br]If you want to hear good instrumental music, than study some Bach, or if that is beyond your abilities, look up someone like Leo Kottke on youtube. Two worlds totally apart, but they were the real geniuses. And there are many many more, and you don't belong to them.[br]Maybe they can inspire you in some way. I don't think that by the way, since you consider yourself and you brother already better than them even if you hadn't heard them.[br][br][br][br][br][br]Hah, i checked out Leo kottke, skilled guitar player BUT boring simple predictable songwriting and in no way at the same level as TM.[br][br] |
| inu-liger 10.10.2008 10:26 |
Swedefag, put up or shut up[br] |
| knakenrudi 10.10.2008 10:43 |
Treasure Moment wrote: knakenrudi wrote: Treasure Moment wrote: knakenrudi wrote: Treasure Moment wrote: [br][br][br]you talk alot of nonsense! we dont know any music theory but we DO know whats good and what has feeling. With all your knowledge in music theory i doubt you could even write something as good as that song. If you can then POST IT!! [br][br]-----------------------------------[br][br]There is little music theory in TQ's excellent post (in any case no 'heavy' or 'difficult' theory). If you ask me, this is just basic and good constructive criticism on how to compose a simple song in a few steps. In any case, if you think that this is already difficult music theory, and you can't work your way round this, than you are the one that doesn't know anything about music.[br][br][br]As i said, all that nonsense means nothing! that song is NOT easy to come up with, if it is i want to see this thomas post something! do it[br][br]------------------------------------[br][br]This song IS easy to come up with. Like I said, hundreds of people with basic piano knowledge and who know a few chords on the piano can improvise these sort of things. I make these things up when I'm bored. Besides that, songs are a lot more than 'chords' or some 'chord progressions'.[br][br]If you want to hear good instrumental music, than study some Bach, or if that is beyond your abilities, look up someone like Leo Kottke on youtube. Two worlds totally apart, but they were the real geniuses. And there are many many more, and you don't belong to them.[br]Maybe they can inspire you in some way. I don't think that by the way, since you consider yourself and you brother already better than them even if you hadn't heard them.[br][br][br][br][br][br]Hah, i checked out Leo kottke, skilled guitar player BUT boring simple predictable songwriting and in no way at the same level as TM.[br][br]--------------------------------------------[br][br]LOL[br][br]Each their own :-)[br]At least you said he's skilled![br][br] |
| thomasquinn 32989 11.10.2008 07:12 |
So, to summarize, TM says he knows everything, we say he doesn't, he says he does, we *prove* he doesn't, he throws a tantrum. Funny how topics like these always end the same way. Like TM songs, I'd almost say... |
| inu-liger 11.10.2008 07:17 |
ThomasQuinn wrote: So, to summarize, TM says he knows everything, we say he doesn't, he says he does, we *prove* he doesn't, he throws a tantrum. Funny how topics like these always end the same way. Like TM songs, I'd almost say...Haha. Well, it's 100% sure by now that he's just a WUM, and until he posts something of *significance*, isn't worthy of our replies anymore at this point. (I know, I know....it's been said before over and over, but I ignored those for a while at first :-P ) Remember kids...feeding trolls is bad for your health! |
| thomasquinn 32989 11.10.2008 07:30 |
When I feed trolls, it's because I hope they'll die of cholesterol poisoning. |
| inu-liger 11.10.2008 07:34 |
ThomasQuinn wrote: When I feed trolls, it's because I hope they'll die of cholesterol poisoning.TM's head is so fat, you'd need more than cholesterol poisoning. This what you need to feed them: http://www.queenzone.com/queen/fan_pics/1111500801151.jpg |
| thomasquinn 32989 11.10.2008 07:37 |
Yeah, but copper and lead prices are up...all thanks to a certain individual and his blood-soaked massacre in Iraq. |
| inu-liger 11.10.2008 07:38 |
ThomasQuinn wrote: Yeah, but copper and lead prices are up...all thanks to a certain individual and his blood-soaked massacre in Iraq.Saddam? I thought they offed him a long time ago... |
| thomasquinn 32989 11.10.2008 07:46 |
Yes, Inu, that was exactly the feller whom I meant... |
| inu-liger 11.10.2008 23:03 |
[p]ThomasQuinn wrote: Yes, Inu, that was exactly the feller whom I meant...[br] ;-)[br] [br] [br] [br] [br] [br] |
| Treasure Moment 12.10.2008 06:48 |
Thomas and Inu are the worst trolls ever, they arent specially bright. |
| thomasquinn 32989 12.10.2008 07:09 |
TM, while you're busy looking up elementary music theory, also look up the definition of 'troll (internet)', and the English word 'especially', so that you might use the three of them correctly, just for once. |
| Treasure Moment 12.10.2008 07:44 |
ThomasQuinn wrote: TM, while you're busy looking up elementary music theory, also look up the definition of 'troll (internet)', and the English word 'especially', so that you might use the three of them correctly, just for once. while you think you are superior with your bullshit music theory nonsene which means SHIT in real life when it comes to composing good music go and TRY writing something even 1/10 as good as TM, good luck! you ll need it! |
| thomasquinn 32989 12.10.2008 08:34 |
Treasure Moment wrote:ThomasQuinn wrote: TM, while you're busy looking up elementary music theory, also look up the definition of 'troll (internet)', and the English word 'especially', so that you might use the three of them correctly, just for once.while you think you are superior with your bullshit music theory nonsene which means SHIT in real life when it comes to composing good music go and TRY writing something even 1/10 as good as TM, good luck! you ll need it! My dear little boy, I have nothing to prove to you. I write stuff that's well over 1/10 as good as yours all the time. Most of it I discard because I don't think it's good enough. What I keep is much, much better than TM material, and that's still not saying much. I do not consider myself "the next great thing" in music, but I am quite confident that I produce decent music, enjoyable to me and to those people I share it with. |
| Treasure Moment 12.10.2008 12:00 |
ThomasQuinn wrote:Treasure Moment wrote:My dear little boy, I have nothing to prove to you. I write stuff that's well over 1/10 as good as yours all the time. Most of it I discard because I don't think it's good enough. What I keep is much, much better than TM material, and that's still not saying much. I do not consider myself "the next great thing" in music, but I am quite confident that I produce decent music, enjoyable to me and to those people I share it with.ThomasQuinn wrote: TM, while you're busy looking up elementary music theory, also look up the definition of 'troll (internet)', and the English word 'especially', so that you might use the three of them correctly, just for once.while you think you are superior with your bullshit music theory nonsene which means SHIT in real life when it comes to composing good music go and TRY writing something even 1/10 as good as TM, good luck! you ll need it! Post or get lost! obviously your music is soo good that you CANT post it! hahah |
| inu-liger 12.10.2008 18:46 |
Treasure Moment wrote:ThomasQuinn wrote:Post or get lost! obviously your music is soo good that you CANT post it! hahahTreasure Moment wrote:My dear little boy, I have nothing to prove to you. I write stuff that's well over 1/10 as good as yours all the time. Most of it I discard because I don't think it's good enough. What I keep is much, much better than TM material, and that's still not saying much. I do not consider myself "the next great thing" in music, but I am quite confident that I produce decent music, enjoyable to me and to those people I share it with.ThomasQuinn wrote: TM, while you're busy looking up elementary music theory, also look up the definition of 'troll (internet)', and the English word 'especially', so that you might use the three of them correctly, just for once.while you think you are superior with your bullshit music theory nonsene which means SHIT in real life when it comes to composing good music go and TRY writing something even 1/10 as good as TM, good luck! you ll need it! FUCK OFF AND DIE SWEDEFAG |
| shoemanbundy 12.10.2008 19:56 |
If anybody posted something no doubt the next thing you release would sound just like it >:) Since you seem to not have any originality and strive to be another "queen or something... |
| thomasquinn 32989 13.10.2008 06:22 |
TM: there are two reasons that you haven't heard anything I composed: #1: You weren't here yet when I posted some of my music, as you were still in kindergarten two, three years ago. #2: You're an obnoxious git who'd only steal what I posted. |
| Treasure Moment 13.10.2008 09:20 |
ThomasQuinn wrote: TM: there are two reasons that you haven't heard anything I composed: #1: You weren't here yet when I posted some of my music, as you were still in kindergarten two, three years ago. #2: You're an obnoxious git who'd only steal what I posted. haha im not a thief and would never steal any of your music, dont worry about that, your stuff cant even compare to TM so dont worry. As i said POST it or stop talking shit! |
| Poo, again 13.10.2008 09:53 |
How can you be so sure that you're better, since you've never heard his music? SHEEP BAAAH BAAAH |
| Treasure Moment 13.10.2008 11:08 |
Poo, again wrote: How can you be so sure that you're better, since you've never heard his music? SHEEP BAAAH BAAAH I assume it because the odds arent very high |
| shoemanbundy 13.10.2008 19:54 |
Treasure Moment wrote:Poo, again wrote: How can you be so sure that you're better, since you've never heard his music? SHEEP BAAAH BAAAHI assume it because the odds arent very high Someones in...DENIAL! FACT FACT FACT!!! |
| inu-liger 13.10.2008 20:48 |
shoemanbundy wrote:Treasure Moment wrote:Someones in...DENIAL! FACT FACT FACT!!!Poo, again wrote: How can you be so sure that you're better, since you've never heard his music? SHEEP BAAAH BAAAHI assume it because the odds arent very high FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! |
| Winter Land Man 13.10.2008 22:09 |
Who the fuck cares about that. I got a new apartment and Treasure Moment will not be invited over. |
| Winter Land Man 13.10.2008 22:58 |
Does Treasure Moment even own every Queen album? He probably thinks Freddie wrote The Show Must Go On and These Are The Days Of Our Lives. |
| Major Tom 14.10.2008 02:00 |
Of course he doesn't. His arguments wheter Freddie Mercury IS Queen comes from the FACT that he only own the Innuendo and the Works album. |
| MercuryArts 17.10.2008 18:36 |
I posted my comments in the Random Music thread at the top of this page. All I can say is WOW! Dude, you owe me 2' 44" of my life back! I plan to collect w/ interest! And thats just the first song. Where's the bridge? Where's the solo breaks, whether its a guitar or keyboard or drums or even a triangle??!?! As for the drums, they sound terrible, I don't mean the playing, I mean the drum sound. It sounds like cardbaord, wet cardboard. It's awful. Was that a real drummer or programmed drums? Don't even try to say theres some metal sounding music in there. Just cause someone turns up the gain & palm mutes a couple power chords does not make it a metal sound ! It sounds like your are trying to be a light Trans Siberian Orchestra. It sounds good to you because you want it to sound good. Stop saying your music is on par w/ Queen. It is not. I'm sorry, but it isn't. As a fan of that great band for the last 27 years, who was lucky enough to see Freddie & Co. perform live it's an insult to read you think you're at that level. Truth hurts sometimes. Pull up your big boy pants & accept it. |
| inu-liger 17.10.2008 22:53 |
Treasure Moment wrote:ThomasQuinn wrote: TM: there are two reasons that you haven't heard anything I composed: #1: You weren't here yet when I posted some of my music, as you were still in kindergarten two, three years ago. #2: You're an obnoxious git who'd only steal what I posted.haha im not a thief and would never steal any of your music, dont worry about that, your stuff cant even compare to TM so dont worry. As i said POST it or stop talking shit! Does Europe ring a bell? |
| Winter Land Man 18.10.2008 00:05 |
I'm going to do a fucking remake of 'Wild Nites' and it'll blow Treasure Moment off the fucking map of rock'n'roll! |
| inu-liger 18.10.2008 01:39 |
Play The Game wrote: I'm going to do a fucking remake of 'Wild Nites' and it'll blow Treasure Moment off the fucking map of rock'n'roll! He's never been on that map to begin with ^_^ |
| Winter Land Man 18.10.2008 01:53 |
I think we should all record some fucking great rock songs and post them on here, and I think that'd blow Treasure Moment's face off of Queenzone. I'm tired of their keyboard 'metal' songs. |
| shoemanbundy 18.10.2008 02:01 |
I think it's obvious Treasure Momentis just in deep deep denial... |
| john bodega 18.10.2008 02:24 |
Treasure Moment, you told ThomasQuinn to 'POST or stop talking shit'. Where is your video? Regards, - Scotty. |
| Winter Land Man 18.10.2008 03:07 |
TM can fuck off. God knows, him and his brother only know how to do one thing right, and that's to give blow jobs. But they give blow jobs to eachother. THOSE FUCKING INCEST LOVING PERVERTS! Go to fucking Hell so you can play with Jeffrey Dahmer!!! |