| wegotit 09.09.2008 10:45 |
link |
| pittrek 09.09.2008 10:52 |
It sucks as much as the artwork |
| wegotit 09.09.2008 10:54 |
pittrek wrote: It sucks as much as the artworkexactly... |
| August R. 09.09.2008 11:01 |
Well, at least there's no spacey stereo pictures of different kinds of Orbs in the booklet. |
| Erin 09.09.2008 11:05 |
It's not that bad, people. ;-) |
| Vali 09.09.2008 11:10 |
it is more or less what I thought it would be, using those two nice pics so ... it is not bad at all |
| masterstroke_84 09.09.2008 11:35 |
Sober.. I like it. What the fuck do you want? stop complaining about everything... is only a damn BOOKLET!! I prefer those pics above the other "informal" pictures in the studio+Priory. |
| Erin 09.09.2008 11:57 |
masterstroke_84 wrote: What the fuck do you want? stop complaining about everything... is only a damn BOOKLET!!Yeah! Right on! LOL ;-) |
| Hitman1965 09.09.2008 12:44 |
Erin wrote:Some people just appear to dislike everything. I really like the new photos and think they look cool.masterstroke_84 wrote: What the fuck do you want? stop complaining about everything... is only a damn BOOKLET!!Yeah! Right on! LOL ;-) |
| wilk 09.09.2008 12:55 |
Looks pretty same old same old to me. |
| Phill the Thrill 09.09.2008 13:12 |
I am enjoying the cover art, I like the simplistic style at least there IS a booklet, nothing worse than buying an album and getting NOTHING at all. |
| masterstroke_84 09.09.2008 13:16 |
Greatest hits, Live Killers & Wembley's first edition: crappy booklets... gotta say. |
| princetom 09.09.2008 14:57 |
lame design. i liked miracle and innuendo for giving each song a seperate side... this in opposition is pretty average. but in comparisation to their first debut album 'queen I' a major progress, isn't it ? :-D |
| Micrówave 09.09.2008 15:13 |
[SARCASM] Where's the picture of Freddie?? Well, then it's awful! [/SARCASM] Thanks for posting it, though. Hurry up Amazon.com. |
| Mack2008 09.09.2008 15:54 |
Does it say if any snails were harmed in the making of the booklet? |
| Hitman1965 09.09.2008 17:05 |
Mack2008 wrote: Does it say if any snails were harmed in the making of the booklet?Slugs actually if you want to get it right ;-) |
| Dan C. 09.09.2008 18:10 |
I don't see the problem... I guess I'm not a true fan... :'( |
| Lester Burnham 09.09.2008 19:03 |
I was kinda hoping there'd be credit information, like who played what, but I guess what confuses me the most is what people dislike about it? Apart from mashing those keys to say "IT SUCKS", well, why not tell us what sucks about it? Is it the font? The size? The white on black? The yellow-to-blue gradient on the song titles? The fact that it's 3 columns? That there's only 4 spreads? That there's only 2 pictures? That the lyrics are included? What could it possibly be? Enlighten us. It's a booklet, with lyrics in it. What more do you need? What more do you expect? I'm quite happy with it. I like to know what I'm singing along to, and the booklet provides me with that information. |
| Erin 09.09.2008 19:30 |
LMAO...I've missed you, Lester! |
| inu-liger 09.09.2008 19:52 |
Hitman1965 wrote:I'm sure the slugs working in the postal services involved with the materials got harmed, trying to peek inside the boxes :-)Mack2008 wrote: Does it say if any snails were harmed in the making of the booklet?Slugs actually if you want to get it right ;-) |
| Adolfo and the spiders from Mercury 09.09.2008 21:17 |
I guess a scanner is way too expensive |
| Erin 09.09.2008 23:06 |
Adolfo wrote: I guess a scanner is way too expensiveAre you joking, or are you really bitching cause it's not scanned? Gotta love QZ... |
| Mustapha_Ibrahim 10.09.2008 05:53 |
As a matterof fact, I think that the photos in the booklet are WAY better than the cover of the album. Take a look at the back cover for example. THAT should have been the cover... |
| pittrek 10.09.2008 06:37 |
Friends, don't get me wrong. I'm not one of the radical QPR haters, but one of the strong supporters. I loved their 2005/2006 tours and I will attend this tour. I think it's great that they do an album. I've heard all the tracks (at least the samples) and I love everything except Still Burning and Voodoo . But I can't say something positive about a black background full of flying sperms overlayed with a writing in a really ugly font in one corner and a miniature photo of those 3 gentlemen in the other corner. Also what is so fantastic about white text on black paper ? The cover and the booklet are ugly and boring. However that doesn't affect my opinion about the album which I'm really looking forward to. |
| Vali 10.09.2008 08:13 |
you rock dude ;) |
| August R. 10.09.2008 09:54 |
Mustapha_Ibrahim wrote: Take a look at the back cover for example. THAT should have been the cover...I like that pic too. But it doesn't really suit to the title of the album. |
| Micrówave 10.09.2008 11:09 |
pittrek wrote: But I can't say something positive about a black background full of flying sperms overlayed with a writing in a really ugly font in one corner and a miniature photo of those 3 gentlemen in the other corner. q-_-p wrote: Looks like God ejaculated within the confines of the cosmos on the front coverBoy you all are sure missing Freddie. Follow me here, and I'll steer you thru. We all know Freddie was Made In Heaven. (Album) We all know Freddie went back to Heaven. (Track 13) We all know that Heaven and The Cosmos are similar concepts. DON'T YOU GET IT? That's Freddie spreading his love over the QPR Project. Gross. |
| The Real Wizard 10.09.2008 12:06 |
Erin wrote:We need to be tolerant of those who download the album. Elitist album-buyers shouldn't be the only ones entitled to the booklet.Adolfo wrote: I guess a scanner is way too expensiveAre you joking, or are you really bitching cause it's not scanned? Gotta love QZ... |
| Raf 10.09.2008 15:38 |
Not really bad. Reminds me a bit of A Kind Of Magic. |
| inu-liger 11.09.2008 01:19 |
Sir GH wrote:Agreed.Erin wrote:We need to be tolerant of those who download the album. Elitist album-buyers shouldn't be the only ones entitled to the booklet.Adolfo wrote: I guess a scanner is way too expensiveAre you joking, or are you really bitching cause it's not scanned? Gotta love QZ... Much as I hate the download concept for the fact that most all legit downloads are lossy, it would be nice to include digital copies of the booklets as well. I think it's been a major complaint among people who buy from iTunes, the lack of 'booklets' of sorts. It's also a bit more of a slap in the face too, when in some cases the album could be had cheaper as a physical product (actual CD or whatever), whether in-store or ordered online elsewhere. |
| inu-liger 11.09.2008 02:34 |
Adolfo wrote: I guess a scanner is way too expensiveOh he has one :-) But obviously a quick snapshot isn't good enough as a teaser? Oy, leech. Btw, is it me, or does the credits in the last page say: "Paul Rodgers thanks the force for being with us (seriously!)" I can barely make it out even when zooming in, lol! |
| pittrek 11.09.2008 02:38 |
Microwave wrote:You're COMPLETELY wrong. Please read my post again. Where did I write that I miss Freddie ? Definitely NOT on this album !pittrek wrote: But I can't say something positive about a black background full of flying sperms overlayed with a writing in a really ugly font in one corner and a miniature photo of those 3 gentlemen in the other corner.q-_-p wrote: Looks like God ejaculated within the confines of the cosmos on the front coverBoy you all are sure missing Freddie. Follow me here, and I'll steer you thru. We all know Freddie was Made In Heaven. (Album) We all know Freddie went back to Heaven. (Track 13) We all know that Heaven and The Cosmos are similar concepts. DON'T YOU GET IT? That's Freddie spreading his love over the QPR Project. Gross. |