Treasure Moment 26.07.2007 20:41 |
i feel sorry for the people in usa, their leader is a nazi and their country will fall apart soon and their liberty taken away. |
sparrow 21754 26.07.2007 20:54 |
ah, there you go again... |
deleted user 26.07.2007 22:29 |
Luckily in this country, we can replace Nazis every 4 years if we want to. |
user name 26.07.2007 22:41 |
Atheist wrote: i feel sorry for the people in usa, their leader is a nazi and their country will fall apart soon and their liberty taken away.Not before we kill all the Jews. |
Matias Merçeauroix 26.07.2007 23:56 |
<b><font color=666600>Music Man wrote:xDDDDDDAtheist wrote: i feel sorry for the people in usa, their leader is a nazi and their country will fall apart soon and their liberty taken away.Not before we kill all the Jews. |
Adolfo and the spiders from Mercury 26.07.2007 23:56 |
Sparrow wrote: ah, there you go again...lol |
iGSM 27.07.2007 03:36 |
I would go to America if it were run by Nazis. Imagine the quilting. |
Treasure Moment 27.07.2007 04:46 |
<font color=fuchsia>Thirtynine ? wrote: Luckily in this country, we can replace Nazis every 4 years if we want to.thats where you are wrong since both parties basically follow the same agenda watch this very interesting interview and you will wake up link |
Treasure Moment 27.07.2007 04:47 |
<b><font color=666600>Music Man wrote:those "jews" at the top are the nazisAtheist wrote: i feel sorry for the people in usa, their leader is a nazi and their country will fall apart soon and their liberty taken away.Not before we kill all the Jews. |
Nathan 27.07.2007 05:41 |
Three words.... God Bless America. |
Treasure Moment 27.07.2007 07:07 |
Nathan wrote: Three words.... God Bless America.yeah its a wonderful country |
Raf 27.07.2007 08:03 |
Atheist wrote:Listen, listen, he knows the truth! No, he OWNS the truth!<font color=fuchsia>Thirtynine ? wrote: Luckily in this country, we can replace Nazis every 4 years if we want to.watch this very interesting interview and you will wake up Bla bla bla. |
thomasquinn 32989 27.07.2007 08:04 |
Atheist, kindly shut the fuck up. You give the SENSIBLE people who oppose Bush a bad name. Then again, you give musicians, and let's not forget, humanity in general, a bad name. |
iGSM 27.07.2007 08:13 |
America Run by The Nazis? I love them. Their last single was just as good. |
Raf 27.07.2007 09:11 |
LOL. Now that you pointed out, iGSM, this thread would make a good name for an indie band. :P |
Treasure Moment 27.07.2007 09:23 |
<font color="lime">Raf840 wrote:can you say brain dead after me?Atheist wrote:Listen, listen, he knows the truth! No, he OWNS the truth! Bla bla bla.<font color=fuchsia>Thirtynine ? wrote: Luckily in this country, we can replace Nazis every 4 years if we want to.watch this very interesting interview and you will wake up people are so fucking stupid, they deserve to be slaves, which is what the government is planning for them fuck stupid people |
Treasure Moment 27.07.2007 09:24 |
<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: Atheist, kindly shut the fuck up. You give the SENSIBLE people who oppose Bush a bad name. Then again, you give musicians, and let's not forget, humanity in general, a bad name.you are a stupid idiot, FACT |
thomasquinn 32989 27.07.2007 10:07 |
Atheist wrote:Ah, yes, that explains EVERYTHING. You need help buddy. A psychiatrist. And a music teacher.<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: Atheist, kindly shut the fuck up. You give the SENSIBLE people who oppose Bush a bad name. Then again, you give musicians, and let's not forget, humanity in general, a bad name.you are a stupid idiot, FACT |
deleted user 27.07.2007 10:36 |
I thought America was run by someone a bit lacking in the intelligence department? So I thought you and him would get along well? |
Raf 27.07.2007 10:53 |
Atheist wrote:Why don't you move away to a better place then?<font color="lime">Raf840 wrote:can you say brain dead after me? people are so fucking stupid, they deserve to be slaves, which is what the government is planning for them fuck stupid peopleAtheist wrote:Listen, listen, he knows the truth! No, he OWNS the truth! Bla bla bla.<font color=fuchsia>Thirtynine ? wrote: Luckily in this country, we can replace Nazis every 4 years if we want to.watch this very interesting interview and you will wake up I don't understand how some people can spend their entire lives complaining about their country and not getting the fuck out of there. |
thomasquinn 32989 27.07.2007 10:57 |
<font color=brianJM>RollingBowieQueen wrote: I thought America was run by someone a bit lacking in the intelligence department? So I thought you and him would get along well?Just goes to show that stupidity is not only new and improved, but also comes in different varieties. |
Treasure Moment 27.07.2007 11:21 |
<font color="lime">Raf840 wrote:its bigger than that, usa has a plan for the whole world not just 1 countryAtheist wrote:Why don't you move away to a better place then? I don't understand how some people can spend their entire lives complaining about their country and not getting the fuck out of there.<font color="lime">Raf840 wrote:can you say brain dead after me? people are so fucking stupid, they deserve to be slaves, which is what the government is planning for them fuck stupid peopleAtheist wrote:Listen, listen, he knows the truth! No, he OWNS the truth! Bla bla bla.<font color=fuchsia>Thirtynine ? wrote: Luckily in this country, we can replace Nazis every 4 years if we want to.watch this very interesting interview and you will wake up |
Treasure Moment 27.07.2007 11:24 |
<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote:you call me stupid when you know shit about whats really happening in the world?<font color=brianJM>RollingBowieQueen wrote: I thought America was run by someone a bit lacking in the intelligence department? So I thought you and him would get along well?Just goes to show that stupidity is not only new and improved, but also comes in different varieties. do you know that bush and his buddies are planning a new world order with a 1 world government and army? bush new world order speech link new america link do you know that they plan to microchip people eventually? they are starting it with RFID chips first link Do you have a brain? i thought so, i bet you didnt know shit about these issues before this |
KillerQueen840 27.07.2007 11:51 |
"Schizophrenia is a chronic mental illness. People with schizophrenia don't perceive and respond to the world as most other people do. Paranoid schizophrenia is a subtype of schizophrenia. People with paranoid schizophrenia hold untrue beliefs (delusions) or hear things others don't hear (auditory hallucinations). Signs and Symptoms: Early signs and symptoms of paranoid schizophrenia — such as social withdrawal, unusual behaviors, anxiety and decline in daily functional abilities — may begin gradually before the primary symptoms of schizophrenia, known collectively as psychosis, are manifested. But disease onset may also be acute with the sudden appearance of psychosis. Delusions and auditory hallucinations are the prominent psychotic symptoms in people with paranoid schizophrenia. Delusions: When people have delusions, they believe something to be true that essentially no one else in their culture believes. A person with paranoid schizophrenia misinterprets experiences and then holds on to those interpretations despite evidence or reasoning to the contrary. Delusions are commonly focused on the perception of being persecuted and often result in the mistrust of other people: -The FBI is spying on me. -Someone is poisoning my food. -My thoughts are being broadcast over the radio. Delusions can become complex stories, and interpretations of experiences often "confirm" the person's view of reality. For example, a traffic officer blowing a whistle is alerting FBI agents on the trail of the person with paranoid schizophrenia. A man who looks at the officer is an agent. When he uses his cell phone, he's reporting the person's location. Delusions may result in a violent outburst if a person believes a perceived threat creates a dangerous situation in need of self-defense." |
Raf 27.07.2007 11:51 |
Atheist wrote:Yeah, right. They're watching us right now, and they can see you're a rebel and you're spoiling their plans. Soon you'll get caught and they'll make you shut up and stop warning people.<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote:you call me stupid when you know shit about whats really happening in the world? do you know that bush and his buddies are planning a new world order with a 1 world government and army? bush new world order speech link new america link do you know that they plan to microchip people eventually? they are starting it with RFID chips first link Do you have a brain? i thought so, i bet you didnt know shit about these issues before this<font color=brianJM>RollingBowieQueen wrote: I thought America was run by someone a bit lacking in the intelligence department? So I thought you and him would get along well?Just goes to show that stupidity is not only new and improved, but also comes in different varieties. About the chips, the illegal spying, etc... I don't think I have anything to hide from any government. Except maybe the fact that when I send stuff by post, I write fake values for each item, as the taxes in my country are too abusive, but big deal, I can't be arrested for that as I'm not making profit from the items I send anyway. They can't watch EVERYBODY. If they're watching people, they're focusing on dangerous people... If you're afraid of being watched, you've probably got something to hide. *EDIT*: ROFLMAO @ KQ840's post!!!! *RE-EDIT*: I'm not one of "them". I swear. *scans Atheist's IP* |
Micrówave 27.07.2007 12:01 |
Atheist wrote: do you know that bush and his buddies are planning a new world order with a 1 world government and army?*looks at calendar* Well, he'd better hurry up. |
Haystacks Calhoun II 27.07.2007 12:18 |
Oh shit.....the black helicopters are circling as we speak.... If Atheist says it, it MUST be true.... |
Treasure Moment 27.07.2007 12:32 |
as i expected, a bunch of stupid naive people with no brain. They dont care to actually look up what ive posted or anything, just carry on being stupid morons. |
Carol! the Musical 27.07.2007 12:34 |
Atheist wrote: fuck stupid peopleBecause sometimes, masturbation is the sensible choice. Go on, knock yourself out! :D |
steven 35638 27.07.2007 12:35 |
Not only is the topic starter of this thread a degenerate, but even the responders give us their own little smart ass remark. If you find something pointless or even obnoxiously offensive just leave it alone. |
Treasure Moment 27.07.2007 12:50 |
<font color=FF0033 face=symbol>Freddie wrote: Not only is the topic starter of this thread a degenerate, but even the responders give us their own little smart ass remark. If you find something pointless or even obnoxiously offensive just leave it alone.have you even checked up on what ive said you stupid braindead moron? can you prove that im wrong? i thought so |
Micrówave 27.07.2007 12:56 |
Atheist wrote: can you prove that im wrong? i thought soYes, I can. But this is for Athiest only, we are not worthy. Go to link |
Treasure Moment 27.07.2007 12:59 |
Micrówave wrote:i thought so, you cant prove me wrong, stupid beingAtheist wrote: can you prove that im wrong? i thought soYes, I can. But this is for Athiest only, we are not worthy. Go to link |
Haystacks Calhoun II 27.07.2007 13:17 |
I like to eat Ice Cream, and I really enjoy a nice pair of slacks. Poo poo. Kisses, H.C. |
user name 27.07.2007 14:48 |
Atheist wrote:Jewish Nazis!? It IS a conspiracy!<b><font color=666600>Music Man wrote:those "jews" at the top are the nazisAtheist wrote: i feel sorry for the people in usa, their leader is a nazi and their country will fall apart soon and their liberty taken away.Not before we kill all the Jews. |
Treasure Moment 27.07.2007 14:50 |
<b><font color=666600>Music Man wrote:just check this documentary and wake upAtheist wrote:Jewish Nazis!? It IS a conspiracy!<b><font color=666600>Music Man wrote:those "jews" at the top are the nazisAtheist wrote: i feel sorry for the people in usa, their leader is a nazi and their country will fall apart soon and their liberty taken away.Not before we kill all the Jews. link |
Haystacks Calhoun II 27.07.2007 14:54 |
Oh rats..... Jewish Nazis? I guess that, in fact, we ARE fucked. |
-fatty- 2850 27.07.2007 14:55 |
Oh it's so easy to mock but Athiest seems to be the only person in here that isn't blind to the truth. I too believe that Bush is secretly planning a new world order with the help of the jews and the freemasons. I have even uncovered a secret plot by the CIA to catch the Loch Ness monster and fly her back to the states. Bush wants to unleash the monster to wreak havoc in New York city so he can blame Scotland and invade us to steal our North Sea oil reserves. I'm with Athiest on this one and when we rally the other freedom fighters together and overthrow Bush, Athiest will be our new emperor. Now bow before Athiest and his glorious new regime. fatty. |
Haystacks Calhoun II 27.07.2007 15:03 |
If he takes over as almighty Grand Pooh-Bah Potentate, what are we gonna do with the hordes of Jewish Nazis? |
Treasure Moment 27.07.2007 15:16 |
just keep being stupid and naive, you all deserve whats coming to you |
thomasquinn 32989 27.07.2007 16:49 |
fatty wrote: Oh it's so easy to mock but Athiest seems to be the only person in here that isn't blind to the truth. I too believe that Bush is secretly planning a new world order with the help of the jews and the freemasons. I have even uncovered a secret plot by the CIA to catch the Loch Ness monster and fly her back to the states. Bush wants to unleash the monster to wreak havoc in New York city so he can blame Scotland and invade us to steal our North Sea oil reserves. I'm with Athiest on this one and when we rally the other freedom fighters together and overthrow Bush, Athiest will be our new emperor. Now bow before Athiest and his glorious new regime. fatty.LOL! That's a new classic! |
Treasure Moment 27.07.2007 16:52 |
<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote:keep on being stupid naive idiotsfatty wrote: Oh it's so easy to mock but Athiest seems to be the only person in here that isn't blind to the truth. I too believe that Bush is secretly planning a new world order with the help of the jews and the freemasons. I have even uncovered a secret plot by the CIA to catch the Loch Ness monster and fly her back to the states. Bush wants to unleash the monster to wreak havoc in New York city so he can blame Scotland and invade us to steal our North Sea oil reserves. I'm with Athiest on this one and when we rally the other freedom fighters together and overthrow Bush, Athiest will be our new emperor. Now bow before Athiest and his glorious new regime. fatty.LOL! That's a new classic! |
thomasquinn 32989 27.07.2007 18:27 |
Oh, we will, thanks. |
Sweetie 27.07.2007 23:26 |
Atheist wrote: its bigger than that, usa has a plan for the whole world not just 1 countrygood thing I live in Australia then :P |
Joeker 28.07.2007 00:14 |
link thats what i think of hitler. hitler was an emo kid. |
Treasure Moment 28.07.2007 00:28 |
<Font color=Wade> Deaky's <h6>Microwave? wrote:yes but you see this concerns the whole world, if you watch that documentry you will understand.Atheist wrote: its bigger than that, usa has a plan for the whole world not just 1 countrygood thing I live in Australia then :P |
Matias Merçeauroix 28.07.2007 01:00 |
Atheist wrote: just keep being stupid and naive, you all deserve whats coming to youBWAHAHAHA!!! *thunderbolt* |
eenaweena 28.07.2007 01:38 |
you know, atheist, you're technically not an atheist. |
Treasure Moment 28.07.2007 01:42 |
<font color="ffa500"><b> chickenlicious! wrote: you know, atheist, you're technically not an atheist.i know, i just say atheist coz i dont believe in man made gods. I do believe there is some kinda force out there. I cant change my nick coz something is wrong with the page when i try to change it. |
Sweetie 28.07.2007 01:45 |
Atheist wrote:you obviously don't watch Futurama<Font color=Wade> Deaky's <h6>Microwave? wrote:yes but you see this concerns the whole world, if you watch that documentry you will understand.Atheist wrote: its bigger than that, usa has a plan for the whole world not just 1 countrygood thing I live in Australia then :P (Teme...anata-wa bakayarou desu ne) |
eenaweena 28.07.2007 01:45 |
no. you aren't an atheist just the same. the fact that you acknowledge that there are man made gods though you don't believe in them makes you NOT an atheist. |
Treasure Moment 28.07.2007 02:38 |
<font color="ffa500"><b> chickenlicious! wrote: no. you aren't an atheist just the same. the fact that you acknowledge that there are man made gods though you don't believe in them makes you NOT an atheist.i believe in nothing since i dont know anything about it ok? NO ONE knows shit about this existence |
The Real Wizard 28.07.2007 03:35 |
Atheist wrote: you call me stupid when you know shit about whats really happening in the world?This is the only thing I can add: link i believe in nothing since i dont know anything about it ok? NO ONE knows shit about this existenceBut I do agree with this statement... though it's the only thing you have ever said that I agree with. |
eenaweena 28.07.2007 05:45 |
Atheist wrote:but you acknowledge they exist, just the same. so that doesn't make you an atheist.<font color="ffa500"><b> chickenlicious! wrote: no. you aren't an atheist just the same. the fact that you acknowledge that there are man made gods though you don't believe in them makes you NOT an atheist.i believe in nothing since i dont know anything about it ok? NO ONE knows shit about this existence oh. and who do you worship? freddie, right? |
eenaweena 28.07.2007 05:49 |
Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote:^is this in relation to what i said? just wondering.Atheist wrote: you call me stupid when you know shit about whats really happening in the world?This is the only thing I can add: linki believe in nothing since i dont know anything about it ok? NO ONE knows shit about this existenceBut I do agree with this statement... though it's the only thing you have ever said that I agree with. |
inmydefence 28.07.2007 07:45 |
who is to say what IS and what ISN'T propaganda? I find it hard to believe that the world trade center(s) fell to the ground solely because those planes flew into them. it would make them the first skyscraper in history to collapse for that reason. other have burned hotter and longer before and not collapsed. I find it equally ridiculous that there is only ONE video available of the "plane" hitting the pentagon. and its impossible from the video to see this "plane". its difficult to believe that a boeing could be flown that low at that such a high speed by someone who was refused a pilots license. I'm not saying that america is run by nazi's! thats a ridiculous statement. but i also think people shouldn't be too quick to swallow what the american media feeds us. the "war on terror"! a ridiculous name! ie. an excuse to invade a country (iraq) who had nothing to do with sept 11th! on the basis that they had WMD's. which they hadn't. good thing they secured all that oil too though. I feel like half of the reports you get on CNN about the "war on terror" are propaganda. To be honest if people can believe in things that NO-ONE can prove exists and are willing to DIE for their belief, why is it so ridiculous for someone to have an open mind about what is and what isn't propaganda. just my tuppence worth! |
Treasure Moment 28.07.2007 08:16 |
inmydefence wrote: who is to say what IS and what ISN'T propaganda? I find it hard to believe that the world trade center(s) fell to the ground solely because those planes flew into them. it would make them the first skyscraper in history to collapse for that reason. other have burned hotter and longer before and not collapsed. I find it equally ridiculous that there is only ONE video available of the "plane" hitting the pentagon. and its impossible from the video to see this "plane". its difficult to believe that a boeing could be flown that low at that such a high speed by someone who was refused a pilots license. I'm not saying that america is run by nazi's! thats a ridiculous statement. but i also think people shouldn't be too quick to swallow what the american media feeds us. the "war on terror"! a ridiculous name! ie. an excuse to invade a country (iraq) who had nothing to do with sept 11th! on the basis that they had WMD's. which they hadn't. good thing they secured all that oil too though. I feel like half of the reports you get on CNN about the "war on terror" are propaganda. To be honest if people can believe in things that NO-ONE can prove exists and are willing to DIE for their belief, why is it so ridiculous for someone to have an open mind about what is and what isn't propaganda. just my tuppence worth!9/11 was an inside job 100% |
Haystacks Calhoun II 28.07.2007 09:37 |
OK.....I also find it amusing that the same people who think that the Bush administration is the single most incompetent entity since the dawm of time had the ability to covertly plan and carry out the 9/11 attacks.... Just boggles the mind. Wouldn't one logically think that, if, in fact, that happened, that they would have also had the foresight to go into Iraq and plant WMD's to find? One would think that would be a far easier task than planning three simultaneous attacks on American soil....get some old bombs, pour some Anthrax or whatever in it, stick some "Iraq WMD" stickers on it, and presto. Problem solved. Sheesh. |
Treasure Moment 28.07.2007 10:04 |
Haystacks Calhounski wrote: OK.....I also find it amusing that the same people who think that the Bush administration is the single most incompetent entity since the dawm of time had the ability to covertly plan and carry out the 9/11 attacks.... Just boggles the mind. Wouldn't one logically think that, if, in fact, that happened, that they would have also had the foresight to go into Iraq and plant WMD's to find? One would think that would be a far easier task than planning three simultaneous attacks on American soil....get some old bombs, pour some Anthrax or whatever in it, stick some "Iraq WMD" stickers on it, and presto. Problem solved. Sheesh.just watch the documentry, your eyes will be opened |
thomasquinn 32989 28.07.2007 11:27 |
Atheist wrote:No, no, if you watch the documentary your mind will degenerate into pudding, and your own internal organs will attempt to kill you, but as your brain was pudding beforehand anyway, it has no effect upon you whatsoever. You can watch it all you like, it's safe. However, we must protect the rest of the planet from suffering such a horrible fate as you do. So be a brave lad, and serve as a good example why regular inhaling of solvents is pretty bad for you.<Font color=Wade> Deaky's <h6>Microwave? wrote:yes but you see this concerns the whole world, if you watch that documentry you will understand.Atheist wrote: its bigger than that, usa has a plan for the whole world not just 1 countrygood thing I live in Australia then :P |
Treasure Moment 28.07.2007 11:53 |
<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote:you are a sad being, also sad for thinking you are a better musician coz you study music, well i can tell you that you probably wont ever write a song thats any good, difference between you and me is that im a CREATOR of music and you are RECIEVER. You need to go to some school and learn all that crapAtheist wrote:No, no, if you watch the documentary your mind will degenerate into pudding, and your own internal organs will attempt to kill you, but as your brain was pudding beforehand anyway, it has no effect upon you whatsoever. You can watch it all you like, it's safe. However, we must protect the rest of the planet from suffering such a horrible fate as you do. So be a brave lad, and serve as a good example why regular inhaling of solvents is pretty bad for you.<Font color=Wade> Deaky's <h6>Microwave? wrote:yes but you see this concerns the whole world, if you watch that documentry you will understand.Atheist wrote: its bigger than that, usa has a plan for the whole world not just 1 countrygood thing I live in Australia then :P even if some if is good to learn its YOU who has to come up with the song not something you learned like a sheep at a school. you are very very stupid |
thomasquinn 32989 28.07.2007 12:45 |
I'm afraid it is YOU who is acting completely stupid here. Of course the song comes from within you. That's called "inspiration". However, a song does not just "come to you" completely finished. Often, it is just a single motif, or a phrase. And even when it is a phrase, maybe even a lengthy one, it doesn't come fully arranged for the setting you wish to play it in (a small jazz combo? a big band? a classical orchestra? a 5-piece rock band?). Then, theory comes in. By studying the science and the art of music, you will know what the listener EXPECTS to hear, allowing you to suspend this point, or to surprise the listener, for instance. Also, understanding the PHILOSOPHY OF MUSIC will help you in understanding WHY something sounds the way it does, thus allowing you to understand other compositions better, as well as your own, and allowing you to create more sophisticated and more original music. Finally, the SCIENCE OF MUSIC deals with the mathematical functions, of which music (being a succession of frequencies) is made up, and allows you to experiment with sound even further. None of the "great artists of the '80s" you like to rave on about would've been there without the basic understanding of music theory they had, and none of the great bands such as Queen, such as Led Zeppelin, such as The Doors, such as [fill in the blanks with nearly anyone you like] would've been able to come up with the music they did, had they not researched the history, science, art and philosophy of music. Take for a good example, Johan Sebastian Bach, whose compositions are famous for their originality, pleasant sound, creativity and ingenuity. He composed almost completely by reasoning what note should go where, employing extensively the theories of music, and disregarding them where relevant. You, on the other hand, act like a bad punk-band playing a cliché I-IV-V progression in barré chords on your guitar and yelling about how that's the best thing the world has ever heard, and how you invented music itself. |
Treasure Moment 28.07.2007 12:50 |
<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: I'm afraid it is YOU who is acting completely stupid here. Of course the song comes from within you. That's called "inspiration". However, a song does not just "come to you" completely finished. Often, it is just a single motif, or a phrase. And even when it is a phrase, maybe even a lengthy one, it doesn't come fully arranged for the setting you wish to play it in (a small jazz combo? a big band? a classical orchestra? a 5-piece rock band?). Then, theory comes in. By studying the science and the art of music, you will know what the listener EXPECTS to hear, allowing you to suspend this point, or to surprise the listener, for instance. Also, understanding the PHILOSOPHY OF MUSIC will help you in understanding WHY something sounds the way it does, thus allowing you to understand other compositions better, as well as your own, and allowing you to create more sophisticated and more original music. Finally, the SCIENCE OF MUSIC deals with the mathematical functions, of which music (being a succession of frequencies) is made up, and allows you to experiment with sound even further. None of the "great artists of the '80s" you like to rave on about would've been there without the basic understanding of music theory they had, and none of the great bands such as Queen, such as Led Zeppelin, such as The Doors, such as [fill in the blanks with nearly anyone you like] would've been able to come up with the music they did, had they not researched the history, science, art and philosophy of music. Take for a good example, Johan Sebastian Bach, whose compositions are famous for their originality, pleasant sound, creativity and ingenuity. He composed almost completely by reasoning what note should go where, employing extensively the theories of music, and disregarding them where relevant. You, on the other hand, act like a bad punk-band playing a cliché I-IV-V progression in barré chords on your guitar and yelling about how that's the best thing the world has ever heard, and how you invented music itself.freddie didnt take any singing lessons and yet he was and still is the best singer of all time bar none, sure it doesnt hurt to know a little about music theory but if you cant write good songs it doesnt mean shit. We personally dont need it and can create better music than many of those people with music education, its all about emotion and musical talent, if you have it then you have it. |
thomasquinn 32989 28.07.2007 13:04 |
Evidently, you've missed the point completely. Consequently, you will never open a good book, and will spend your life as an embittered wanna-be artist, simply because you were to stubborn to learn from those who know more than you in a particular field. Because THAT'S what music's about: learning from what others have achieved, so that you can build on that, and take music even further. |
inmydefence 28.07.2007 20:19 |
Haystacks Calhounski wrote: OK.....I also find it amusing that the same people who think that the Bush administration is the single most incompetent entity since the dawm of time had the ability to covertly plan and carry out the 9/11 attacks.... Just boggles the mind. Wouldn't one logically think that, if, in fact, that happened, that they would have also had the foresight to go into Iraq and plant WMD's to find? One would think that would be a far easier task than planning three simultaneous attacks on American soil....get some old bombs, pour some Anthrax or whatever in it, stick some "Iraq WMD" stickers on it, and presto. Problem solved. Sheesh.Firstly, i dont think the bust administration are at all incompetent. i think bush is an idiot. I've seldom seen someone make more of a tit of himself on national tv before. Some of the utterly STUPID things he's said are unbelievable. Its the people around him that tell him what to do/say/think are the ones that are dangerous. Maybe the bush admin didn't NEED to co-ordinate the three attacks on home soil because that was done for them by a terrorist organisation (although i wouldn't put it past em that they helped the towers on their way down). I mean come on. If there has EVER been a country thats concious of its national security then its the USA. so HOW could this attack possible of happened? in my opinion, i believe they LET it happen. its exactly what they needed as an excuse to start an economic future saving WAR on TERROR! which is ridiculous, because as long as you can scare people into thinking they're in danger then you have good reason to remain "at war" with the terrorists. i mean, its hardly a coincidence that with all the DOCUMENTED opportunities the USA has had to blow the hell out of osama and OOOPS! he got away again! As for the WMD's... why plant things and risk getting your hands dirty when you can just blame someone else? ... sorry bad intelligence! prob solved. Its something completely different... but when the 7/7 bombings took place in london, why did the police chase someone for ages, and when they caught up with him shot him 8 times in the head? i would have thought one shot would be enough? maybe two? but EIGHT??!! they really wanted to make sure he didnt survive. and apparently he wasn't even a terrorist? what did this guy know before he was brutally killed? i wonder if the other bombers knew they were terrorists themsleve?? it really makes you wonder, because these "attacks" came along EXACTLY when Blair needed them, as he was taking so much critisism for the his helping bush in the war, at a time when everyone would be thinking politics because it was on the 1st day of G8. (gramatical nightmare that last sentence! nevermind!) Again, I'll probably be flamed and called a conspiricy nut for being Skeptical and having an open mind. But dont think i believe this because i haven't heard the alleged "reasons" these events panned out as they did! I Have heard the other side, i just choose not to buy into what they tell us. Don't get me wrong, I'm not playing down these events, i feel deeply sorry for anyone caught up in these tragic events. I just dont trust politicians! pity the converse has turned into bickering with atheist because its nice to have a good discusion going! even if most of you dont agree with me! |
Treasure Moment 29.07.2007 02:35 |
inmydefence wrote:finally someone who can use its brain a little!Haystacks Calhounski wrote: OK.....I also find it amusing that the same people who think that the Bush administration is the single most incompetent entity since the dawm of time had the ability to covertly plan and carry out the 9/11 attacks.... Just boggles the mind. Wouldn't one logically think that, if, in fact, that happened, that they would have also had the foresight to go into Iraq and plant WMD's to find? One would think that would be a far easier task than planning three simultaneous attacks on American soil....get some old bombs, pour some Anthrax or whatever in it, stick some "Iraq WMD" stickers on it, and presto. Problem solved. Sheesh.Firstly, i dont think the bust administration are at all incompetent. i think bush is an idiot. I've seldom seen someone make more of a tit of himself on national tv before. Some of the utterly STUPID things he's said are unbelievable. Its the people around him that tell him what to do/say/think are the ones that are dangerous. Maybe the bush admin didn't NEED to co-ordinate the three attacks on home soil because that was done for them by a terrorist organisation (although i wouldn't put it past em that they helped the towers on their way down). I mean come on. If there has EVER been a country thats concious of its national security then its the USA. so HOW could this attack possible of happened? in my opinion, i believe they LET it happen. its exactly what they needed as an excuse to start an economic future saving WAR on TERROR! which is ridiculous, because as long as you can scare people into thinking they're in danger then you have good reason to remain "at war" with the terrorists. i mean, its hardly a coincidence that with all the DOCUMENTED opportunities the USA has had to blow the hell out of osama and OOOPS! he got away again! As for the WMD's... why plant things and risk getting your hands dirty when you can just blame someone else? ... sorry bad intelligence! prob solved. Its something completely different... but when the 7/7 bombings took place in london, why did the police chase someone for ages, and when they caught up with him shot him 8 times in the head? i would have thought one shot would be enough? maybe two? but EIGHT??!! they really wanted to make sure he didnt survive. and apparently he wasn't even a terrorist? what did this guy know before he was brutally killed? i wonder if the other bombers knew they were terrorists themsleve?? it really makes you wonder, because these "attacks" came along EXACTLY when Blair needed them, as he was taking so much critisism for the his helping bush in the war, at a time when everyone would be thinking politics because it was on the 1st day of G8. (gramatical nightmare that last sentence! nevermind!) Again, I'll probably be flamed and called a conspiricy nut for being Skeptical and having an open mind. But dont think i believe this because i haven't heard the alleged "reasons" these events panned out as they did! I Have heard the other side, i just choose not to buy into what they tell us. Don't get me wrong, I'm not playing down these events, i feel deeply sorry for anyone caught up in these tragic events. I just dont trust politicians! pity the converse has turned into bickering with atheist because its nice to have a good discusion going! even if most of you dont agree with me! |
Sweetie 29.07.2007 03:50 |
<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote:Is my brain pudding?Atheist wrote:No, no, if you watch the documentary your mind will degenerate into pudding, and your own internal organs will attempt to kill you, but as your brain was pudding beforehand anyway, it has no effect upon you whatsoever. You can watch it all you like, it's safe. However, we must protect the rest of the planet from suffering such a horrible fate as you do. So be a brave lad, and serve as a good example why regular inhaling of solvents is pretty bad for you.<Font color=Wade> Deaky's <h6>Microwave? wrote:yes but you see this concerns the whole world, if you watch that documentry you will understand.Atheist wrote: its bigger than that, usa has a plan for the whole world not just 1 countrygood thing I live in Australia then :P |
thomasquinn 32989 29.07.2007 10:36 |
Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote:And, might I add, because he wrote wiser than he knows. At least, I deduce so from his other posts.Atheist wrote: you call me stupid when you know shit about whats really happening in the world?This is the only thing I can add: linki believe in nothing since i dont know anything about it ok? NO ONE knows shit about this existenceBut I do agree with this statement... though it's the only thing you have ever said that I agree with. |
thomasquinn 32989 29.07.2007 10:39 |
<Font color=Wade> Deaky's <h6>Microwave? wrote:It depends. Did you watch the documentary in a "Hey, I'm watching Comedy Central" sort of way, or were you watching it in a "it's on tv so it's true" sort of way? There is an easy test: can you still breathe and move at the same time? If so, you're still safe.<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote:Is my brain pudding?Atheist wrote:No, no, if you watch the documentary your mind will degenerate into pudding, and your own internal organs will attempt to kill you, but as your brain was pudding beforehand anyway, it has no effect upon you whatsoever. You can watch it all you like, it's safe. However, we must protect the rest of the planet from suffering such a horrible fate as you do. So be a brave lad, and serve as a good example why regular inhaling of solvents is pretty bad for you.<Font color=Wade> Deaky's <h6>Microwave? wrote:yes but you see this concerns the whole world, if you watch that documentry you will understand.Atheist wrote: its bigger than that, usa has a plan for the whole world not just 1 countrygood thing I live in Australia then :P |
Treasure Moment 29.07.2007 10:55 |
<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote:you fucking moron, the mainstream news is also on tv, what makes it more real? what the fuck do know that they are telling the truth you naive idiot?<Font color=Wade> Deaky's <h6>Microwave? wrote:It depends. Did you watch the documentary in a "Hey, I'm watching Comedy Central" sort of way, or were you watching it in a "it's on tv so it's true" sort of way? There is an easy test: can you still breathe and move at the same time? If so, you're still safe.<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote:Is my brain pudding?Atheist wrote:No, no, if you watch the documentary your mind will degenerate into pudding, and your own internal organs will attempt to kill you, but as your brain was pudding beforehand anyway, it has no effect upon you whatsoever. You can watch it all you like, it's safe. However, we must protect the rest of the planet from suffering such a horrible fate as you do. So be a brave lad, and serve as a good example why regular inhaling of solvents is pretty bad for you.<Font color=Wade> Deaky's <h6>Microwave? wrote:yes but you see this concerns the whole world, if you watch that documentry you will understand.Atheist wrote: its bigger than that, usa has a plan for the whole world not just 1 countrygood thing I live in Australia then :P |
thomasquinn 32989 29.07.2007 11:32 |
They aren't. But, listen carefully, as this will be helpful to you too: they are also bureaucrats. Therefore, they are predictable: they don't lie because they want to cover something up, they lie because they are ordered to. Thus they work in a routine, thus they are not foolproof liars! I understand HOW and WHEN they lie, and so will you, if you take as little as a week to research the subject properly (and you can do it all from your computer, so long as you THINK ABOUT WHAT YOU KNOW ALREADY AND *WHAT YOU STILL NEED TO FIND OUT ABOUT*). The people in your documentary, however, do something useful on the one hand, but don't realize it on the other. They are attempting to fit their own conspiracy-theory into the errors in the official story. To do so, they maim the truth even further, by bending or breaking the evidence that is NOT falsified. However, they DID achieve something useful: they uncovered several flaws in the evidence. Indeed, the government is covering something up, but these conspiracy-theories do not cover the real, verifiable evidence. If we are to find out what really went on, we must not let our fantasies carry us away, we must look at what we can make sure is true! |
inmydefence 29.07.2007 13:16 |
<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: They aren't. But, listen carefully, as this will be helpful to you too: they are also bureaucrats. Therefore, they are predictable: they don't lie because they want to cover something up, they lie because they are ordered to. Thus they work in a routine, thus they are not foolproof liars! I understand HOW and WHEN they lie, and so will you, if you take as little as a week to research the subject properly (and you can do it all from your computer, so long as you THINK ABOUT WHAT YOU KNOW ALREADY AND *WHAT YOU STILL NEED TO FIND OUT ABOUT*). The people in your documentary, however, do something useful on the one hand, but don't realize it on the other. They are attempting to fit their own conspiracy-theory into the errors in the official story. To do so, they maim the truth even further, by bending or breaking the evidence that is NOT falsified. However, they DID achieve something useful: they uncovered several flaws in the evidence. Indeed, the government is covering something up, but these conspiracy-theories do not cover the real, verifiable evidence. If we are to find out what really went on, we must not let our fantasies carry us away, we must look at what we can make sure is true!What you're saying makes perfect sense. but even if you begin to talk about these flaws in the evidence, INSTANTLY you're brushed off as a conspiracy theorist and your credibility is 0. Its the same if you question the reason for the war! as long as we are led to believe terrorism is a threat, (and lets face it, it ALWAYS HAS BEEN in one form or another) then they can continue to fight their "war on terror" If you argue against it you are helping the terrorists in some way! When you question what the government says happened on sept 11th then you're a Conspiracy Theorist and your questions require no answer! awfully convenient for them eh? |
Treasure Moment 29.07.2007 14:43 |
inmydefence wrote:what is the solution for "war on terror"?<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: They aren't. But, listen carefully, as this will be helpful to you too: they are also bureaucrats. Therefore, they are predictable: they don't lie because they want to cover something up, they lie because they are ordered to. Thus they work in a routine, thus they are not foolproof liars! I understand HOW and WHEN they lie, and so will you, if you take as little as a week to research the subject properly (and you can do it all from your computer, so long as you THINK ABOUT WHAT YOU KNOW ALREADY AND *WHAT YOU STILL NEED TO FIND OUT ABOUT*). The people in your documentary, however, do something useful on the one hand, but don't realize it on the other. They are attempting to fit their own conspiracy-theory into the errors in the official story. To do so, they maim the truth even further, by bending or breaking the evidence that is NOT falsified. However, they DID achieve something useful: they uncovered several flaws in the evidence. Indeed, the government is covering something up, but these conspiracy-theories do not cover the real, verifiable evidence. If we are to find out what really went on, we must not let our fantasies carry us away, we must look at what we can make sure is true!What you're saying makes perfect sense. but even if you begin to talk about these flaws in the evidence, INSTANTLY you're brushed off as a conspiracy theorist and your credibility is 0. Its the same if you question the reason for the war! as long as we are led to believe terrorism is a threat, (and lets face it, it ALWAYS HAS BEEN in one form or another) then they can continue to fight their "war on terror" If you argue against it you are helping the terrorists in some way! When you question what the government says happened on sept 11th then you're a Conspiracy Theorist and your questions require no answer! awfully convenient for them eh? it can only be ONE thing and that is TOTAL control over the people meaning big brother and microchip in your hand so that no "terror attacks" can happen again. Its pretty easy to figure that out really |
inmydefence 29.07.2007 15:51 |
Atheist wrote:what is the solution for "war on terror"? it can only be ONE thing and that is TOTAL control over the people meaning big brother and microchip in your hand so that no "terror attacks" can happen again. Its pretty easy to figure that out really I think you're kind of missing the point i was making. as long as its necessary for the USA to keep a close eye on one of the LARGEST remaining oil supplies left in the world, they WANT terrorism to remain a valid threat so they have a reason to continue the "war". |
The Real Wizard 30.07.2007 01:39 |
<font color="ffa500"><b> chickenlicious! wrote: ^is this in relation to what i said? just wondering.You mean, this?: no. you aren't an atheist just the same. the fact that you acknowledge that there are man made gods though you don't believe in them makes you NOT an atheist.I disagree. Answering the ultimate questions in life is very often the furthest thing from black and white. Religion often makes them black and white, so you don't have to think about them for yourself, since the answers are given to you in a nice and presentable form. However, for those who don't buy into these kinds of ideas, and with enough research come to acknowledge that man created these ideas throughout history, it doesn't make sense to say that all these people who have chosen this path are atheists. They can be atheists, agnostics, or anything, really. It all depends on what you define "God" or the "ultimate" as. The possibilities are endless, because it is all philosophy. It is belief in what cannot be proven. Therefore, all options are valid unless/until they can be proven wrong. inmydefence wrote: To be honest if people can believe in things that NO-ONE can prove exists and are willing to DIE for their belief, why is it so ridiculous for someone to have an open mind about what is and what isn't propaganda. just my tuppence worth!And a fine tuppence! I just brought the word "propaganda" into the discussion to hopefully spark some independent thought in our beloved friend "Atheist". I wasn't referring to anything specifically as propaganda. What you're saying makes perfect sense. but even if you begin to talk about these flaws in the evidence, INSTANTLY you're brushed off as a conspiracy theorist and your credibility is 0.Exactly... it's the "either you're with us or you're against us" mentality. |
Mercuryworks 30.07.2007 05:27 |
Atheist wrote:Yes he did take lessons...he was in his boarding school's chorus in India(watch Untold Story or any documentary on Freddie, seeing how you love documentaries so much). And if you know anything about chorus you see that all must sing on harmony on certain notes hence, learning how to sing. As for theory most of the songs Queen wrote weren't with a sprinkle of theory the contained lots of juxtapositions, modulations, and harmony. (ie:March of the Black Queen, Bo Rhap, etc).even their simpler stuff had mass harmony and hidden arrangements, driving every tonal center to its max(ie:I want to break free and Hammer to fall).<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: I'm afraid it is YOU who is acting completely stupid here. Of course the song comes from within you. That's called "inspiration". However, a song does not just "come to you" completely finished. Often, it is just a single motif, or a phrase. And even when it is a phrase, maybe even a lengthy one, it doesn't come fully arranged for the setting you wish to play it in (a small jazz combo? a big band? a classical orchestra? a 5-piece rock band?). Then, theory comes in. By studying the science and the art of music, you will know what the listener EXPECTS to hear, allowing you to suspend this point, or to surprise the listener, for instance. Also, understanding the PHILOSOPHY OF MUSIC will help you in understanding WHY something sounds the way it does, thus allowing you to understand other compositions better, as well as your own, and allowing you to create more sophisticated and more original music. Finally, the SCIENCE OF MUSIC deals with the mathematical functions, of which music (being a succession of frequencies) is made up, and allows you to experiment with sound even further. None of the "great artists of the '80s" you like to rave on about would've been there without the basic understanding of music theory they had, and none of the great bands such as Queen, such as Led Zeppelin, such as The Doors, such as [fill in the blanks with nearly anyone you like] would've been able to come up with the music they did, had they not researched the history, science, art and philosophy of music. Take for a good example, Johan Sebastian Bach, whose compositions are famous for their originality, pleasant sound, creativity and ingenuity. He composed almost completely by reasoning what note should go where, employing extensively the theories of music, and disregarding them where relevant. You, on the other hand, act like a bad punk-band playing a cliché I-IV-V progression in barré chords on your guitar and yelling about how that's the best thing the world has ever heard, and how you invented music itself.freddie didnt take any singing lessons and yet he was and still is the best singer of all time bar none, sure it doesnt hurt to know a little about music theory but if you cant write good songs it doesnt mean shit. We personally dont need it and can create better music than many of those people with music education, its all about emotion and musical talent, if you have it then you have it. As for all these Loose Change and conspriracy plots...If you love these movie a GREAT movie to see is Mein Kampe by none other than Hitler. |
inmydefence 30.07.2007 06:17 |
Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote:Thanks!<font color="ffa500"><b> chickenlicious! wrote: ^is this in relation to what i said? just wondering.You mean, this?:no. you aren't an atheist just the same. the fact that you acknowledge that there are man made gods though you don't believe in them makes you NOT an atheist.I disagree. Answering the ultimate questions in life is very often the furthest thing from black and white. Religion often makes them black and white, so you don't have to think about them for yourself, since the answers are given to you in a nice and presentable form. However, for those who don't buy into these kinds of ideas, and with enough research come to acknowledge that man created these ideas throughout history, it doesn't make sense to say that all these people who have chosen this path are atheists. They can be atheists, agnostics, or anything, really. It all depends on what you define "God" or the "ultimate" as. The possibilities are endless, because it is all philosophy. It is belief in what cannot be proven. Therefore, all options are valid unless/until they can be proven wrong.inmydefence wrote: To be honest if people can believe in things that NO-ONE can prove exists and are willing to DIE for their belief, why is it so ridiculous for someone to have an open mind about what is and what isn't propaganda. just my tuppence worth!And a fine tuppence! I just brought the word "propaganda" into the discussion to hopefully spark some independent thought in our beloved friend "Atheist". I wasn't referring to anything specifically as propaganda.What you're saying makes perfect sense. but even if you begin to talk about these flaws in the evidence, INSTANTLY you're brushed off as a conspiracy theorist and your credibility is 0.Exactly... it's the "either you're with us or you're against us" mentality. As interesting subjaect as this is... i Don't think it really warrants three different threads! USA: freedom to fascism End of USA America is run by Nazi's You seem awfully excited by all this Atheist. Fair enough i suppose, but please, Keep it to ONE THREAD!! |
eenaweena 30.07.2007 07:38 |
Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote:gotcha. thanks!<font color="ffa500"><b> chickenlicious! wrote: ^is this in relation to what i said? just wondering.You mean, this?:no. you aren't an atheist just the same. the fact that you acknowledge that there are man made gods though you don't believe in them makes you NOT an atheist.I disagree. Answering the ultimate questions in life is very often the furthest thing from black and white. Religion often makes them black and white, so you don't have to think about them for yourself, since the answers are given to you in a nice and presentable form. However, for those who don't buy into these kinds of ideas, and with enough research come to acknowledge that man created these ideas throughout history, it doesn't make sense to say that all these people who have chosen this path are atheists. They can be atheists, agnostics, or anything, really. It all depends on what you define "God" or the "ultimate" as. The possibilities are endless, because it is all philosophy. It is belief in what cannot be proven. Therefore, all options are valid unless/until they can be proven wrong.inmydefence wrote: To be honest if people can believe in things that NO-ONE can prove exists and are willing to DIE for their belief, why is it so ridiculous for someone to have an open mind about what is and what isn't propaganda. just my tuppence worth!And a fine tuppence! I just brought the word "propaganda" into the discussion to hopefully spark some independent thought in our beloved friend "Atheist". I wasn't referring to anything specifically as propaganda.What you're saying makes perfect sense. but even if you begin to talk about these flaws in the evidence, INSTANTLY you're brushed off as a conspiracy theorist and your credibility is 0.Exactly... it's the "either you're with us or you're against us" mentality. |
Raf 30.07.2007 08:25 |
I'm a nazi, I run America, and I bite. Well, not really true... Except for "I bite", maybe. |
thomasquinn 32989 30.07.2007 10:13 |
inmydefence wrote:Naturally. Because, from the p.o.v. of the general population, you are undermining a truth that makes life simpler, easier to comprehend. If you can't trust the government, that means you will have to think for yourself ALL THE TIME. While most sensible people do so already, it is a nightmare-scenario to many, I'm sad to say.<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: They aren't. But, listen carefully, as this will be helpful to you too: they are also bureaucrats. Therefore, they are predictable: they don't lie because they want to cover something up, they lie because they are ordered to. Thus they work in a routine, thus they are not foolproof liars! I understand HOW and WHEN they lie, and so will you, if you take as little as a week to research the subject properly (and you can do it all from your computer, so long as you THINK ABOUT WHAT YOU KNOW ALREADY AND *WHAT YOU STILL NEED TO FIND OUT ABOUT*). The people in your documentary, however, do something useful on the one hand, but don't realize it on the other. They are attempting to fit their own conspiracy-theory into the errors in the official story. To do so, they maim the truth even further, by bending or breaking the evidence that is NOT falsified. However, they DID achieve something useful: they uncovered several flaws in the evidence. Indeed, the government is covering something up, but these conspiracy-theories do not cover the real, verifiable evidence. If we are to find out what really went on, we must not let our fantasies carry us away, we must look at what we can make sure is true!What you're saying makes perfect sense. but even if you begin to talk about these flaws in the evidence, INSTANTLY you're brushed off as a conspiracy theorist and your credibility is 0. Its the same if you question the reason for the war! as long as we are led to believe terrorism is a threat, (and lets face it, it ALWAYS HAS BEEN in one form or another) then they can continue to fight their "war on terror" If you argue against it you are helping the terrorists in some way!Indeed. The same goes for the war on drugs (which would be far more effective when waged in the form of controlled legalization, cutting off an estimated 80-90% of all income coming to organized crime), the Cold War (a good example because source-material is slowly becoming available, allowing us to study the entire process of misleading the population), and basically any other government project that requires huge sums of money. If it costs the tax-payer money, you need to give him/her a story that will make sure that questioning the system sounds like subversion. When you question what the government says happened on sept 11th then you're a Conspiracy Theorist and your questions require no answer! awfully convenient for them eh?Exactly. Regardless of who is sitting in the Oval Office right now, the people arranging and executing counter-intelligence are not stupid. Nor are they, most of them at least, evil. They are, however, bureaucratic, and therefore they have, as I stated earlier, PREDICTABLE FLAWS. And predictable flaws make that a system can, and eventually will, be broken. Therefore, I am confident that the truth will out at some point. The downside is that it might easily be in 25 years. |
thomasquinn 32989 30.07.2007 10:13 |
<font color="lime">Raf840 wrote: I'm a nazi, I run America, and I bite. Well, not really true... Except for "I bite", maybe.Ah, but only by request, I hear. |
its_a_hard_life 26994 30.07.2007 10:42 |
<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote::DDDDDDDDDDD.<font color="lime">Raf840 wrote: I'm a nazi, I run America, and I bite. Well, not really true... Except for "I bite", maybe.Ah, but only by request, I hear. |
Treasure Moment 30.07.2007 11:49 |
inmydefence wrote:I think you're kind of missing the point i was making. as long as its necessary for the USA to keep a close eye on one of the LARGEST remaining oil supplies left in the world, they WANT terrorism to remain a valid threat so they have a reason to continue the "war". yes thats true but at the same time they can enslave their own population by having more control on them, RIFD chips for exampleAtheist wrote:what is the solution for "war on terror"? it can only be ONE thing and that is TOTAL control over the people meaning big brother and microchip in your hand so that no "terror attacks" can happen again. Its pretty easy to figure that out really |
Micrówave 30.07.2007 12:42 |
Athiest- I just had a "movement" and out came an RIFD chip. Would you like it for your evidence file? The thing is nearly a foot long, you'd think I would have noticed it before. |
Treasure Moment 30.07.2007 13:00 |
Micrówave wrote: Athiest- I just had a "movement" and out came an RIFD chip. Would you like it for your evidence file? The thing is nearly a foot long, you'd think I would have noticed it before.how stupid are you man? you are 37 and this stupid? amazing |
Haystacks Calhoun II 30.07.2007 15:39 |
I'll just throw back my legs and pollute my britches with delight. |