QueenZone discussion #991893

<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: Now *this* is what we call 'rumours'. I hope the they're wrong, though. If the producers are: a) sensible b) artistically decent c) sane enough to know what will lead to a box-office hit Just one of the three should be enough to cast Depp.

SomebodyWhoLoves wrote: I can see it now. Sacha Cohen as Freddie redoing the Live Aid scene, complete with arm band, jeans, and white shirt, miming, I repeat MIMING to Radio Gaga.

SomebodyWhoLoves wrote: Movies should be about Spider-Man ie comic book heroes, not real life heroes. There will be nothing worthwhile to see in such a movie.

<b><font color="#FF1493">The Fairy King wrote:

SomebodyWhoLoves wrote: I can see it now. Sacha Cohen as Freddie redoing the Live Aid scene, complete with arm band, jeans, and white shirt, miming, I repeat MIMING to Radio Gaga.

Many people do want to see a Queen/Freddie movie. The world doesn't evolve around you, i repeat DOESN'T evolve around you. :')

Adam Baboolal wrote:

SomebodyWhoLoves wrote: Movies should be about Spider-Man ie comic book heroes, not real life heroes. There will be nothing worthwhile to see in such a movie.

How boring would that be? To think that someone would rather inspire to see a comic book fantasy rather than a real life hero. If DeNiro's company want to tell his story, bring it on? Freddie was a helluva character and would make a fascinating subject to work with. Quite frankly, if I was given the choice to see just one film for the rest of the year, between spiderman and a Freddie film? As much as I like Spiderman, I'd find Freddie far more interesting. Adam.

SomebodyWhoLoves wrote:

Adam Baboolal wrote:

SomebodyWhoLoves wrote: Movies should be about Spider-Man ie comic book heroes, not real life heroes. There will be nothing worthwhile to see in such a movie.

How boring would that be? To think that someone would rather inspire to see a comic book fantasy rather than a real life hero. If DeNiro's company want to tell his story, bring it on? Freddie was a helluva character and would make a fascinating subject to work with. Quite frankly, if I was given the choice to see just one film for the rest of the year, between spiderman and a Freddie film? As much as I like Spiderman, I'd find Freddie far more interesting. Adam.

How pathetic will you guys be sitting there in some cramped Movie Theatre, watching Sacha Cohen miming to Radio Gaga. Do you really need to see this? Is that Art? Is that entertainment?

<b><font color="#FF1493">The Fairy King wrote:

SomebodyWhoLoves wrote:

Adam Baboolal wrote:

SomebodyWhoLoves wrote: Movies should be about Spider-Man ie comic book heroes, not real life heroes. There will be nothing worthwhile to see in such a movie.

How boring would that be? To think that someone would rather inspire to see a comic book fantasy rather than a real life hero. If DeNiro's company want to tell his story, bring it on? Freddie was a helluva character and would make a fascinating subject to work with. Quite frankly, if I was given the choice to see just one film for the rest of the year, between spiderman and a Freddie film? As much as I like Spiderman, I'd find Freddie far more interesting. Adam.

How pathetic will you guys be sitting there in some cramped Movie Theatre, watching Sacha Cohen miming to Radio Gaga. Do you really need to see this? Is that Art? Is that entertainment?

No an empty movie about a comic soaking in special affects with zero story is art. Idiot.

<b><font color="#FF1493">The Fairy King wrote: Dunno why you're all ranting about "entertainment". The guy was all about entertainment. :')

SomebodyWhoLoves wrote:

<b><font color="#FF1493">The Fairy King wrote: Dunno why you're all ranting about "entertainment". The guy was all about entertainment. :')

I am not ranting against Entertainment. Freddie was entertaining yes. But a movie about him in which ACTORS pretend to be Freddie is NOT entertaining. That you consider that to be entertaining, is really really sad.

goodco wrote: What's worse, watching a well-done Queen movie, or write Freddie-fantasy tripe?

SomebodyWhoLoves wrote:

<b><font color="#FF1493">The Fairy King wrote: Dunno why you're all ranting about "entertainment". The guy was all about entertainment. :')

I am not ranting against Entertainment. Freddie was entertaining yes. But a movie about him in which ACTORS pretend to be Freddie is NOT entertaining. That you consider that to be entertaining, is really really sad.

Damn, woman, stop being so retarded.

SomebodyWhoLoves wrote:

Damn, woman, stop being so retarded.

You do realize I'm a guy, right?

<b><font color="#FF1493">The Fairy King wrote:

SomebodyWhoLoves wrote:

<b><font color="#FF1493">The Fairy King wrote: Dunno why you're all ranting about "entertainment". The guy was all about entertainment. :')

I am not ranting against Entertainment. Freddie was entertaining yes. But a movie about him in which ACTORS pretend to be Freddie is NOT entertaining. That you consider that to be entertaining, is really really sad.

I said ABOUT not against. :') Just cause you think it's sad that people would like to see more about Freddie's life doesn't me an it's a fact. It's a shame you call most of the Queen/Freddie fans "very very sad", because you have a problem with certain aspects of his life. It isn't entertainment, it's infotainment. You're already judging before the actors have been cast. Now how sad is that? xD

<b><font color="#FF1493">The Fairy King wrote:

SomebodyWhoLoves wrote:

Damn, woman, stop being so retarded.

You do realize I'm a guy, right?

You act like a bitch, maybe that's why he made that misjudgement. :')

SomebodyWhoLoves wrote:

<b><font color="#FF1493">The Fairy King wrote:

SomebodyWhoLoves wrote:

<b><font color="#FF1493">The Fairy King wrote: Dunno why you're all ranting about "entertainment". The guy was all about entertainment. :')

I am not ranting against Entertainment. Freddie was entertaining yes. But a movie about him in which ACTORS pretend to be Freddie is NOT entertaining. That you consider that to be entertaining, is really really sad.

I said ABOUT not against. :') Just cause you think it's sad that people would like to see more about Freddie's life doesn't me an it's a fact. It's a shame you call most of the Queen/Freddie fans "very very sad", because you have a problem with certain aspects of his life. It isn't entertainment, it's infotainment. You're already judging before the actors have been cast. Now how sad is that? xD

Let me ask you guys a question. Answer in Yes or No. Do you want to see Sacha Cohen re-enact the Live Aid scene, where he is dressed up as Freddie Mercury, and miming to Radio-Gaga? Including the Day-Ohs? Please have the balls to answer YES or NO.

SomebodyWhoLoves wrote:

<b><font color="#FF1493">The Fairy King wrote:

SomebodyWhoLoves wrote:

Damn, woman, stop being so retarded.

You do realize I'm a guy, right?

You act like a bitch, maybe that's why he made that misjudgement. :')

Yeah, coming from a guy who has PINK colored letters and the words FAIRY KING.

<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: SomebodyWhoLoves, you are a completely insane fucking idiot. Film is a medium that can put across the most serious topics around. Take 'Metropolis' (1927), for instance. If you want pure entertainment from a film, that's one of YOUR many problems, not ours. You do not understand film, that's clear, but don't bother us with your insanity.

<font color=00CCFF>Mercury Lover<h6>HA! wrote: Duh. I meant, The best actor to match his likeness. For a movie about his life.

<b><font color="#FF1493">The Fairy King wrote: Ever seen Jim Carrey as Andy Kaufman? You don't think about Carrey when you watch Man On The Moon. I think Johnny Depp can pull the same thing off with the Fredster.

Good_Company50 wrote: What I want to know . . . are these reputable papers or just tabloids? The Sun and The Mirror?

<font color=brianJM>RollingBowieQueen wrote: I think 'Sacha Baren Cohen as Freddie'... got lost in translation somewhere. A bit like the rumour that Keith snorted his daddy's ashes...but a bit more stupid and unbelieveable.

<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: Now *this* is what we call 'rumours'. I hope the they're wrong, though. If the producers are: a) sensible b) artistically decent c) sane enough to know what will lead to a box-office hit Just one of the three should be enough to cast Depp.

Mercury SingerOfLife wrote: Spiderman sucks, i mean common how can you like this film? its 90% special effects. I miss the good old days when films were more true and didnt need that much effects. Now with you saying there is no need to do a freddie film i plain stupidity! Im surprised it took them 16 years to realize the mans talent and awesomeness! If there ever should be a film about anybody , it should be freddie and now it will soon be one!

The prophet's song wrote: *sigh* And for the third time: link He is NOT going to be Freddie

Gratzi wrote:

The prophet's song wrote: *sigh* And for the third time: link He is NOT going to be Freddie

But of course he won't. Those were merely rumours.(Praise the Lord) But it was interesting to watch the whole fuss this created.

<b><font color="#FF1493">The Fairy King wrote: Ever seen Jim Carrey as Andy Kaufman? You don't think about Carrey when you watch Man On The Moon. I think Johnny Depp can pull the same thing off with the Fredster.

The prophet's song wrote: *sigh* And for the third time: link He is NOT going to be Freddie