| mahlers.com 29.04.2007 14:50 |
YIP! |
| deleted user 29.04.2007 15:01 |
It's official stuff... BANNED |
| mahlers.com 29.04.2007 15:13 |
Do you know how fast DimeADozen.Org is in reference to allowable and banned material of any artist(s)? I've not seen "Live At The Rainbow" at any store anywhere and DimeADozen.Org has not banned the torrent at all. |
| dobo 29.04.2007 15:34 |
Just because you have not seen it doesn't mean that it's not official. It was part of a box set and released on video in limited numbers and incase you did not see the warning I will put it here for you: DO NOT POST OFFICIAL MATERIAL OR LINKS TO OFFICIAL MATERIAL HERE Info on the official release: link |
| A-Project 29.04.2007 15:41 |
Please! Can you send me this torrent to queen-rare@list.ru |
| mahlers.com 29.04.2007 15:47 |
Dobo.... Read this well. Don't ever shout at me again. DimeADozen.Org is expediant, intelligent and faster than your mind can travel. |
| dobo 29.04.2007 15:59 |
I am not shouting at you, You mean well I'm sure, the caps is how the warning is printed above where you post a message. |
| Saint Jiub 29.04.2007 16:13 |
It's official. It was released on the Box of Tricks (more likely) or the Box of Flix ... can't remember which one exactly. It is official, and against board rules. Richard does not need the RIAA on his ass. |
| Penetration_Guru 29.04.2007 16:28 |
mahlers.com wrote: Dobo.... Read this well. Don't ever shout at me again. DimeADozen.Org is expediant, intelligent and faster than your mind can travel.LISTEN FUCKFACE I AM HEARTILY SICK OF YOU POSTING LINKS TO STUFF THAT HAS ALREADY BEEN POSTED HERE, AND IF SHOUTING IS THE ONLY WAY TO GET THE CONCEPT ACROSS TO YOU THEN I'M MORE THAN HAPPY TO ACCOMODATE. |
| Saint Jiub 29.04.2007 16:36 |
I thought one could post any concert, unless official, even if it was previously posted in another thread. Based on your response, I doubt Mahler will remove the link now. Hopefully Barb will find time to remove the link, if Mahler does not. On the other hand, glad to see you posted a link to Oxford ... |
| mahlers.com 29.04.2007 17:46 |
PFFFT... I'm getting to the bottom of your claims. BTW, Penetration Guru, I wager you couldn't penetrate your way out of a concrete Fed Prison if ya tried and prayed to God or Allah! |
| Josh Henson 29.04.2007 18:41 |
Ha ha! I like all the bitching that goes on up here. They should change the name from Queenzone.com to BitchFest.com!!! |
| Penetration_Guru 29.04.2007 18:47 |
mahlers.com wrote: PFFFT... I'm getting to the bottom of your claims. BTW, Penetration Guru, I wager you couldn't penetrate your way out of a concrete Fed Prison if ya tried and prayed to God or Allah!Sorry, how is that relevant? Do you plan to have me swept away to a US prison? How, exactly? I know it's difficult, Willie, but try and stay on topic ps it appears to now be banned. Looking forward to your apology to dobo & co. |
| Penetration_Guru 29.04.2007 18:50 |
Mike Van wrote: I thought one could post any concert, unless official, even if it was previously posted in another thread. Based on your response, I doubt Mahler will remove the link now. Hopefully Barb will find time to remove the link, if Mahler does not. On the other hand, glad to see you posted a link to Oxford ...But it is official.. And yes, you're right, there's no major issue with reposting - my issue with Mahler (which, in my defence I've tried putting to him subtly) is that he has no awareness of what's going on - "here's this new show on Dime" - when the notes he then posts specifically state that it originated on here in the first place. I only reacted on here (where it's not actually specific to the thread) out of frustration at a) his ignoring all subtle points b) his over zealous response to dobo. |
| mahlers.com 29.04.2007 19:54 |
Penetration_Guru wrote:Hey, I was informed that it was banned hours ago. A very good reason NOT to have sent the BANNED notice is plain to anyone except you "Penetrated Guru".Mike Van wrote: I thought one could post any concert, unless official, even if it was previously posted in another thread. Based on your response, I doubt Mahler will remove the link now. Hopefully Barb will find time to remove the link, if Mahler does not. On the other hand, glad to see you posted a link to Oxford ...But it is official.. And yes, you're right, there's no major issue with reposting - my issue with Mahler (which, in my defence I've tried putting to him subtly) is that he has no awareness of what's going on - "here's this new show on Dime" - when the notes he then posts specifically state that it originated on here in the first place. I only reacted on here (where it's not actually specific to the thread) out of frustration at a) his ignoring all subtle points b) his over zealous response to dobo. You are highly uncooth, vulgar and vile amidst the young, under age peoples of this board. The only reaction I meant towards anyone in my previous post written to you was about you, nobody else but you, solely you entirely. If you were within my physical reach and said that, you'd have been slapped upside the head immediatly and or taken outside of childrens perception and promptly kicked to the curb and "left in the garbage." |
| Saint Jiub 29.04.2007 20:34 |
Can Fatty set up this bout? Well, maybe not ... Why bother. Based on mahler's reaction, I regret saying anything to PG. |
| Padilla 29.04.2007 20:49 |
I really think admission should be charged and and free popcorn handed out for these shows. |
| Penetration_Guru 30.04.2007 02:32 |
mahlers.com wrote: A very good reason NOT to have sent the BANNED notice is plain to anyone except you "Penetrated Guru".We have now entered "mahler speak"...anyone else clear on why it shouldn't be banned? You are highly uncooth, vulgar and vile amidst the young, under age peoples of this board.Hilarious nonsense. The only reaction I meant towards anyone in my previous post written to you was about you, nobody else but you, solely you entirely.Once he starts typing nothing stops him until he's used up his entire vocabulary If you were within my physical reach and said that, you'd have been slapped upside the head immediatly and or taken outside of childrens perception and promptly kicked to the curb and "left in the garbage."I'm sorry, how are threats of violence a good example to the "under age peoples"? You big hard internet warrior you. I'm quaking in my boots lest they ever release you into the community at th esame time that I happen to be passing through the slum in question.... |
| 928 30.04.2007 05:06 |
:Thread Closed: |
| Radio-Fixer (ex 'queen7391') 30.04.2007 08:13 |
Can you send me the torrent on this e-mail: ********************* ??? Thank you!!!!! |
| 928 30.04.2007 09:07 |
queen7391 wrote: Can you send me the torrent on this e-mail: ncastorina@hotmail.it ??? Thank you!!!!!You are no better than him. Asking for links to official material is theft in process in my view & the same as posting the link. Buy It!! Tosser |
| willem-jan 8923 30.04.2007 12:42 |
What if you'd like to have this and DID buy the original box? |
| slithybill 30.04.2007 12:54 |
I would love to be able to see this concert and I would love to buy it from a legitimate source. Where is it for sale that the proceeds go back to Queen? If I buy it second hand, like from EIL.com, Queen won't see a dime of my money. So where can I buy this official release from an official source? |
| 928 30.04.2007 13:02 |
willem-jan wrote: What if you'd like to have this and DID buy the original box?Then you're a bigger tosser than he is as you wouldn't need it. And ..if you say it got lost or stolen or damaged...hard luck.Its official.Buy it again. The record company wouldn't replace it & would probably say the same. Out Of Print maybe....no difference. It's a fixed work and carries a copyright whether OOP or not. It can be re-released/re-issued. Look on e-bay/Amazon/Rare VHS finding sites/Boot Sales etc for a copy. Ever read the start of commercial VHS's or DVDs.What does that warning say? So then....do you still wish to back up theft?? Tosser |
| willem-jan 8923 30.04.2007 14:49 |
928 wrote:And what if i'd like to have a copy as back up, since VHS-tapes don't get better when you play them frequently?willem-jan wrote: What if you'd like to have this and DID buy the original box?Then you're a bigger tosser than he is as you wouldn't need it. And ..if you say it got lost or stolen or damaged...hard luck.Its official.Buy it again. The record company wouldn't replace it & would probably say the same. Out Of Print maybe....no difference. It's a fixed work and carries a copyright whether OOP or not. It can be re-released/re-issued. Look on e-bay/Amazon/Rare VHS finding sites/Boot Sales etc for a copy. Ever read the start of commercial VHS's or DVDs.What does that warning say? So then....do you still wish to back up theft?? Tosser I fully agree with you on illegal distribution of copyrighted material, but there are some grey "boundary" areas. And apart from that, insulting people doesn't make you look any smarter at all. This release wasn't even released by Queen Productions or anything related. I bought it from some home shopping network, some fuckers who rip-off people on a daily base. Not that this makes it ok to download it, but still. I'd like to have my back up copy. |
| 928 30.04.2007 16:10 |
Then make a copy of the one you supposedly already have. You seem to think that it's fine for a back up copy to come to you from elsewhere and not YOUR copy...you miss the point of back up Subject closed...its futile.. ,and what you say will be wrong legally so just drop it dood eh. Move on or find what you want back at Limewire..politly said of course. Maybe Barbs can delete this useless thread as it's turned to a space waste in an announce forum. |
| Penetration_Guru 30.04.2007 16:18 |
I think it's unfair to try and impose "thread closed" on others. It makes you look as much of a cock as the rest of us slinging shit at each other. |
| 928 30.04.2007 16:23 |
I'm not imposing... but unless you are going to say that sharing official copyright material is ok and above board....then its a waste of space thread. It serves no purpose. But go ahead then...join the tossers and back up theft |
| The Real Wizard 01.05.2007 01:31 |
P_G vs. Mahler? I'd pay to see that. |
| thomasquinn 32989 01.05.2007 07:17 |
mahlers.com wrote: Dobo.... Read this well. Don't ever shout at me again. DimeADozen.Org is expediant, intelligent and faster than your mind can travel.You deserve shouting at. |
| aseef 01.05.2007 10:52 |
It's available in vcd format on mininova. just type in, in the search box. Queen Live Hit enter and it's just before halfway. Great quality. Plus superfast seeds. |
| Bobby_brown 01.05.2007 13:56 |
Man, with Google you can find almost anything. Just type the name of the concert + torrent and download it from another site. 928 is right, let´s keep this site clean from copyright stuff! Take care |
| 928 01.05.2007 14:55 |
mittybitty wrote: It's available in vcd format Great quality.hahahahahaha....... VCD & great quality in the same sentence. Tosser in a different hat eh Bob...hahahahaha |
| Radio-Fixer (ex 'queen7391') 01.05.2007 16:47 |
928 wrote:Sorry, but how can I buy this edition, if it was just a limited edition in 1992...?!?!?queen7391 wrote: Can you send me the torrent on this e-mail: ncastorina@hotmail.it ??? Thank you!!!!!You are no better than him. Asking for links to official material is theft in process in my view & the same as posting the link. Buy It!! Tosser |
| thomasquinn 32989 02.05.2007 06:54 |
queen7391 wrote:Well...there's eBay, there's second hand record stores, there's fan-forums, etc., etc., etc.928 wrote:Sorry, but how can I buy this edition, if it was just a limited edition in 1992...?!?!?queen7391 wrote: Can you send me the torrent on this e-mail: ncastorina@hotmail.it ??? Thank you!!!!!You are no better than him. Asking for links to official material is theft in process in my view & the same as posting the link. Buy It!! Tosser |
| Radio-Fixer (ex 'queen7391') 02.05.2007 08:59 |
I agree with you about sharing original files.. I'm not, and, I think, we all are not leeches... but, a torrent called "more video hits" (or something similar), containing original material from "Greatest Flix II, III, The Films, etc.." was not so "banned".. So, if the original edition was a VHS, why should a DVD (which Queen Producions never released) be considered as an original stuff?? |
| Bobby_brown 02.05.2007 10:20 |
queen7391 wrote: I agree with you about sharing original files.. I'm not, and, I think, we all are not leeches... but, a torrent called "more video hits" (or something similar), containing original material from "Greatest Flix II, III, The Films, etc.." was not so "banned".. So, if the original edition was a VHS, why should a DVD (which Queen Producions never released) be considered as an original stuff??Because it´s original and it was oficially released. I know that it´s out of print now, but the copyright laws are still valid. Many bootlegers sell them at ebay and other stores (that´s where i bought my Rainbow DVD!-normally they only sell the Rainbow concert in DVD and not the full "Box of Tricks" package), but that doesn´t mean Queen Productions don´t care. It only means that they can´t fight bootlegers and they know it. But if they wan´t to shut down a site like Queenzone that would be very easy to do, and that´s what we´re trying to avoid by banning all oficial stuff. The Greatest Videos 3 torrent you´re talking about if i remember correctly didn´t include official videos, but if it have oficial videos then it should be erased like the other oficial stuff. I can understand the frustation of doing this to out of print material, but it´s their stuff and their work and their money that´s on the table, so i guess it´s better for us to follow the rules. There are many other torrent sites where you can find those official torrents, just google it! Take are |
| 928 02.05.2007 14:43 |
queen7391 wrote: I agree with you about sharing original files.. I'm not, and, I think, we all are not leeches... but, a torrent called "more video hits" (or something similar), containing original material from "Greatest Flix II, III, The Films, etc.." was not so "banned".. So, if the original edition was a VHS, why should a DVD (which Queen Producions never released) be considered as an original stuff??OK..tolerent head back on. There are reasons not to post official material and there are reasons not to post links to official material. ANY commercially released material be it available now or not carries a fixed work copyright.This cloaks the artist(s) with that work. Basically...you pay or its Piracy (not a bootleg). Limited Editions.Only available on this..or that.Was only available in 1953.It doesn't matter. It has been made commercially available and carries copyright. Now...if you post a link to any copyright work ,you are in effect "an accomplice" to theft of that copyright. Also, This web page that you are reading now,this second,can be googled. Try it..copy and paste a sentence or a thread subject into your search bar and you will find this page. That link or anything about promotion of illegal sites can now be traced back to here and QZ can be shut permanantly for being an "accomplice" to copyright theft. Its not just me being a nasty bastard folks. Everything i say to you all has valid knowledge behind it and i'm just wising you up.You should all know that by now.Being direct just makes you remember it Do you want the site shut down?Richard fined?Or even YOU traced back? Then use your noddle a bit when posting links...ok ;) Being direct |
| 928 02.05.2007 14:51 |
queen7391 wrote: I agree with you about sharing original files.. I'm not, and, I think, we all are not leeches... but, a torrent called "more video hits" (or something similar), containing original material from "Greatest Flix II, III, The Films, etc.." was not so "banned".. So, if the original edition was a VHS, why should a DVD (which Queen Producions never released) be considered as an original stuff??OK..tolerent head back on. There are reasons not to post official material and there are reasons not to post links to official material. ANY commercially released material be it available now or not carries a fixed work copyright.This cloaks the artist(s) with that work. Basically...you pay or its Piracy (not a bootleg). Limited Editions.Only available on this..or that.Was only available in 1953.It doesn't matter. It has been made commercially available and carries copyright. Now...if you post a link to any copyright work ,you are in effect "an accomplice" to theft of that copyright. Also, This web page that you are reading now,this second,can be googled. Try it..copy and paste a sentence or a thread subject into your search bar and you will find this page. That link or anything about promotion of illegal sites can now be traced back to here and QZ can be shut permanantly for being an "accomplice" to copyright theft. Its not just me being a nasty bastard folks. Everything i say to you all has valid knowledge behind it and i'm just wising you up.You should all know that by now.Being direct just makes you remember it Do you want the site shut down?Richard fined?Or even YOU traced back? Then use your noddle a bit when posting links or asking for copyight material...ok ;) |
| mahlers.com 02.05.2007 16:21 |
928 wrote:Let's try to understand something here that perhaps you do not understand at all 928.queen7391 wrote: I agree with you about sharing original files.. I'm not, and, I think, we all are not leeches... but, a torrent called "more video hits" (or something similar), containing original material from "Greatest Flix II, III, The Films, etc.." was not so "banned".. So, if the original edition was a VHS, why should a DVD (which Queen Producions never released) be considered as an original stuff??OK..tolerent head back on. There are reasons not to post official material and there are reasons not to post links to official material. ANY commercially released material be it available now or not carries a fixed work copyright.This cloaks the artist(s) with that work. Basically...you pay or its Piracy (not a bootleg). Limited Editions.Only available on this..or that.Was only available in 1953.It doesn't matter. It has been made commercially available and carries copyright. Now...if you post a link to any copyright work ,you are in effect "an accomplice" to theft of that copyright. Also, This web page that you are reading now,this second,can be googled. Try it..copy and paste a sentence or a thread subject into your search bar and you will find this page. That link or anything about promotion of illegal sites can now be traced back to here and QZ can be shut permanantly for being an "accomplice" to copyright theft. Its not just me being a nasty bastard folks. Everything i say to you all has valid knowledge behind it and i'm just wising you up.You should all know that by now.Being direct just makes you remember it Do you want the site shut down?Richard fined?Or even YOU traced back? Then use your noddle a bit when posting links or asking for copyight material...ok ;) DimeADozen.Org is quite the elite legal website, no doubt about it. After a warlike skirmish that effected both DimeADozen.Org and Comcast Cable Internet providers, stemming from the nearly undetected usage of Nirvana material, both the ISP Comcast and DimeADozen.Org suffered interruptions and DOS attacks. There is a peace treaty now, with the simple integral understanding that any and all officially released material shalt not be allowed within DimeADozen.Org and if any transgression occurs, the torrent immediatly be banned. DimeADozen.Org is quite coherent and expediant with vast knowledge about that fact. It is the root belief and cause to carry any information allowed by any artist, primarily within the genre of rock and roll to be shared freely so that anyone, worldwide may come to know the deeply afluent effects and importance of music throughouth history, for the past, present and future. William K. Mahler link Cape Cod of Massachusetts, USA. PS: You can bet every last hair you'll ever grow 928 I was the diplomatic entity involved with the treaty. |
| Penetration_Guru 02.05.2007 17:30 |
OK, it's hard to be sure as you've included what you appear to believe are long words at random intervals in a vain attempt to appear intellectual, but are you actually claiming to have brokered a deal between the owners of Nirvana's copyright and the website then known as Easytree? Because if you are, I do not believe you for a nanosecond. You are not credible as an individual with sufficient intellectual capacity. ps I can use long words in coherent sentences.... |
| mahlers.com 02.05.2007 19:05 |
Penetration_Guru wrote: OK, it's hard to be sure as you've included what you appear to believe are long words at random intervals in a vain attempt to appear intellectual, but are you actually claiming to have brokered a deal between the owners of Nirvana's copyright and the website then known as Easytree? Because if you are, I do not believe you for a nanosecond. You are not credible as an individual with sufficient intellectual capacity. ps I can use long words in coherent sentences....spirit move me, fill my world around me, answer to the questions, i can't find..... hey all i did was shoot of a critical email filled with the pertinent data regarding the complete failure of the dimeadozen.org hard drives and servers. no, i was not given the make, the models etc, i just went to an avid music purveyor and musician with a world wide reach of intelligence and bravada in computer science. within hours, it was fixed and i received word that mission was accomplished. for it was within the scope of the isp and dime skirmish (referred to as war then) that was a complete logical trace of mine, simply by the story and critical timeline of the actions between all parties that left the conclusion that a signifigant "cell sector" created attackes in the name of vengeance for whom they believed they were working for dime and dime was not responsible for authorizing any order for dos attacks. in other words, yep, many people at the right time and place to bring to an immediate halt to all suspicious activities aka threats to anyone using the internet at that time. wk |
| The Real Wizard 03.05.2007 00:41 |
Either this topic is completely over my head, or Mahler is posting a whole lot of incoherent crap as usual. Please, the latter... *crosses fingers* !! |
| dogwithabone 03.05.2007 02:27 |
Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote: Either this topic is completely over my head, or Mahler is posting a whole lot of incoherent crap as usual. Please, the latter... *crosses fingers* !!I think it's the only thing Mahler is "good" at! |
| 928 03.05.2007 04:51 |
WTF are you on Mahler If you were that wise you wouldn't of posted the fucking official stuff in the 1st place. So don't give me that crap.You know bollox. Or.... as you knew about the Nirvana issue with Dime & the possibility of closure because of it,then what were you trying to do here posting official eh? Piss off cretinous retard with your fancy bourgeois cliches.I shit bigger than you in the morning. PS:I still say this thread should be deleted. Its in the announce forum and there is no announce in this thread except Mahlers.com announcing that he's into copyright theft and is a bit of a wanker....lol |
| seba_79 03.05.2007 05:35 |
Peace, my brothers, peace...everybody loves Queen... |
| Penetration_Guru 03.05.2007 16:35 |
mahlers.com wrote: "i just went to an avid music purveyor and musician with a world wide reach of intelligence and bravada in computer science." huh? bravada is not a word, worldwide reach of intelligence is a total non-sequitor. "for it was within the scope of the isp and dime skirmish that was a complete logical trace of mine" I'm sorry? "in other words, yep, many people at the right time and place to bring to an immediate halt to all suspicious activities aka threats to anyone using the internet at that time." that isn't a sentence either. If it continued after a comma with some sort of verb, it might stand a chance of becoming one. |
| frank39 04.05.2007 02:45 |
Sir GH wrote: or Mahler is posting a whole lot of incoherent crap as usual. How right, I just can´t believe that Mahler doesn´t realize, that he is posting Queenzone stuff as brandnew stuff in Queenzone again and again. PG vs Mahler: what a funny battle. (Sir GH: I sent you an email) |