Henry V 29.04.2007 12:57 |
just been having a good listen to Innuendo and observed how very different Freddie's voice is in comparison to 1984/mid 80's years. Does anybody wish to give me some info on this? many thanks Marc |
Daniel Nester 29.04.2007 13:55 |
I think Innuendo is probably a bad place to start looking at how Freddie's voice changed over the years. A lot of those tracks are from his solo recordings, Heaven for Everyone is from The Cross sessions, and still others are from the mid-80s. It might be better to look at how his voice changes from Hot Space --> Works --> A Kind of Magic. To my ears, there's lots of changes in tenor and in range in that time period. Perhaps he smoked even more? Or drank? Some of it, I am sure, is natural as the body gets older. |
Katicas..(L) 29.04.2007 14:11 |
I love freddies voice. It just melts you. |
mattsmith 29.04.2007 14:42 |
Heaven for everyone was on Made in heaven, not Innuendo. The difference in the way Freddie sings is actually quite big, even from the miracle, to innuendo which was a gap of about 18 months to 2 years. I believe that his voice in the 90's went back to the way it was in the early to mid 70's, delivered with a soaring power and immense range. Just my opinion though. Matt. |
Last Cyborg 29.04.2007 14:42 |
Daniel Nester wrote: I think Innuendo is probably a bad place to start looking at how Freddie's voice changed over the years. A lot of those tracks are from his solo recordings, Heaven for Everyone is from The Cross sessions, and still others are from the mid-80sYou're thinking of Made In Heaven not Innuendo.. Innuendo was all recorded in 1990/1991 AFAIK. |
steven 35638 29.04.2007 15:08 |
Daniel Nester wrote: I think Innuendo is probably a bad place to start looking at how Freddie's voice changed over the years. A lot of those tracks are from his solo recordings, Heaven for Everyone is from The Cross sessions, and still others are from the mid-80s. It might be better to look at how his voice changes from Hot Space --> Works --> A Kind of Magic. To my ears, there's lots of changes in tenor and in range in that time period. Perhaps he smoked even more? Or drank? Some of it, I am sure, is natural as the body gets older.And you wrote two books about Queen? On a side note, the period you're talking about, Marc, is at a time when Freddie was really pushing it and striving for the up most perfection. Every song he recorded at that time seemed to contain so much raw emotion and unrelenting power. The reason as to why he was probably progressing so fast is because he knew for a fact he didn't have much time until he'd die. He probably didn't want to fade away. Hence the saying : "It's better to burn out, than to fade away." In my opinion, this is not only Freddie Mercury's finest moment, but Queen's as well. Innuendo was a beautiful way to end the career of one of rocks greatest legends. |
Kiki2 29.04.2007 16:26 |
Maybe because he stopped drinking and smoking. In Innuendo, his voice looked more like the voice he had in the 70's... |
Henry V 29.04.2007 17:50 |
I do prefer that mid-80's hard edge he had on his voice. I find his voice from the innuendo sessions - fantastic range and all - but a little nasal. truly an amazing singner |
saltnvinegar 29.04.2007 19:24 |
Henry V wrote: I do prefer that mid-80's hard edge he had on his voice. I find his voice from the innuendo sessions - fantastic range and all - but a little nasal. truly an amazing singnerI agree, was just about to use the description 'nasal' too. I think some of his later vocals sound more like his regular speaking voice than his earlier 80's 'rock' voice. Don't get me wrong, the trademarks are all still there but I think if he'd sung a track like 'Innuendo' in the mid-80's, some of those notes like 'till the END of time' would have had more of a lower growl to them like he belted out during the Magic gigs. |
marcenciels 29.04.2007 22:54 |
hummmm...he had stop smoking, no choice and dringking was out !...lost's of factors changed his voice ... lost weight fast after the miracle, and you can hear the difference for innuendo, that you get on a few songs on made in heaven. in the end, he gave all that he could, by perfecting to the max and a good dose desperation. to add, this odd feeling i've had for year's...maybe i'm totally wrong, but when freddie died...i always believed it would have been the last time he would of toured. |
Scott_Mercury 29.04.2007 23:11 |
marcenciels wrote: maybe i'm totally wrong, but when freddie died...i always believed it would have been the last time he would of toured.No, I agree. I too believe that when Freddie died, he would probably quit touring. Maybe a few local shows.... but he wouldn't feel up to a big tour. No way. |
Adolfo and the spiders from Mercury 30.04.2007 02:13 |
i think everyone here could writte a book about queen |
Pim Derks 30.04.2007 04:38 |
Probably had to do with sucking less cock than in the 80's. |
saltnvinegar 30.04.2007 04:58 |
Pim Derks wrote: Probably had to do with sucking less cock than in the 80's.Sometimes I really wish he'd been straight cos then people would focus on what mattered like his voice and the music rather than obsessing over his sex life. |
Bob-Plant 30.04.2007 08:00 |
marcenciels wrote: hummmm...he had stop smoking, no choice and dringking was out !...lost's of factors changed his voice ... lost weight fast after the miracle, and you can hear the difference for innuendo, that you get on a few songs on made in heaven. I could have sworn that Brian spoke of Freddie, during the last sessions, "propping himself up, taking a drink of vodka and singing for as long as he could". I could be wrong about this, but my guess is he cut way back on alcohol, but not completely. Eliminating smoking and cocaine, as well as an over-all healthier lifestyle were probably the main reasons his voice returned to more of what it was in the 70's. |
Richy Mercury 30.04.2007 09:10 |
Pim Derks wrote: Probably had to do with sucking less cock than in the 80's.I love it!! |
Armando Alejandro Estrada 30.04.2007 09:58 |
Pim Derks wrote: Probably had to do with sucking less cock than in the 80's.I'm speechless. Moron. |
Micrówave 30.04.2007 13:36 |
If I spent enough money on gear and hired a really good engineer, these days I could sound like Freddie Mercury. I don't think he got any better or worse. The technology did. Plus that was a lot of head voice singing. He didn't do that much in the 80s. |
Pim Derks 30.04.2007 13:46 |
Thank you, thank you! * takes a bow |
Winter Land Man 30.04.2007 15:35 |
marcenciels wrote: hummmm...he had stop smoking, no choice and dringking was out !...lost's of factors changed his voice ... lost weight fast after the miracle, and you can hear the difference for innuendo, that you get on a few songs on made in heaven. in the end, he gave all that he could, by perfecting to the max and a good dose desperation. to add, this odd feeling i've had for year's...maybe i'm totally wrong, but when freddie died...i always believed it would have been the last time he would of toured.Didn't Brian May say Freddie would down a vodka or something before doing lines for the Innuendo album and perhaps some stuff on Made In Heaven? |
Legy 30.04.2007 16:13 |
Freddie quit smoking around the late 80's. There are pictures of Freddie smoking a cigarette during the Miracle video, I'm quite sure he quit not long after that. Freddie did not quit drinking, drinking helped with the pain he was in, and he was in a lot pain. Brian has told the "Freddie and Vodka" story on many occasions. I think it was for TSMGO, I can be wrong though. As for the change in his voice, it was to do a lot with recovery. The man didn't tour in three years so his voice was well rested |
Adam Baboolal 30.04.2007 17:23 |
artemismoon wrote: Brian has told the "Freddie and Vodka" story on many occasions. I think it was for TSMGO, I can be wrong though.It was Mother Love that that story came from. Adam. |
buderhin 30.04.2007 18:26 |
And A Winters Tale!!! |
Daniel Nester 30.04.2007 18:50 |
Sorry that I spaced on Heaven for Everyone! Still, that track was recorded years ago, as most people knows, so to look for the change in Freddie's voice from Innuendo to Made in Heaven, or even A Kind of Magic to Innuendo for that matter, is going to have to really listen hard. The change in voice for me is around The Works. That's when Freddie's voice turns downward, there's a bit of a sharp strain (I am thinking of the intro to "It's a Hard Life"), a direct result of his smoking, perhaps. |
Daniel Nester 30.04.2007 18:56 |
I agree that there is some change back to his 70s vocal range in the Innuendo sessions. He had to really shift into that falsetto, however: in "Don't Try So Hard," you can tell he is not able to really shift into non-falsetto as easily as he could have in, say, the Queen II-era. No one has really talked about how Freddie said he actually liked how smoking changed his voice. He said this in one of the DoRo interviews, and it always stuck with me. I wonder what Brian thought of Freddie's smoking this whole time! |
_Bijou_ 01.05.2007 05:21 |
I think Freddie's voice around '91 is a mix between husky and rough and pure and delicate. On songs like 'Don't Try So Hard' it could have been recorded in the 70s to me. But on 'Hitman' it sounds quite rough like you can tell he's straining on the one and he does sound quite bad. 'The Show Must Go On' is very pure then at the end it has bits where it sounds like he's straining. But on 'Bijou' it's sounds so delicate and fragile. But if you listen to the first album then Innuendo there are obvious differences. I know it's obvious but he sounds alot older in some ways on 'Innuendo'. |
Daniel Nester 01.05.2007 11:32 |
Azzadude, I meant only "Heaven for Everyone," which started out as a single for The Cross, with a Roger vocal. Freddie sang backup on the Roger-sung track, but he also did his own vocal take, which exists in the Cross arrangement (rare B-side). Then the boys re-did it for MiH. As for the other sessions that make up MiH, it's a patchwork of old and recent. Innuendo is as well, to a certain extent, although I can't rattle off the timelines just now. Marking papers at the end of term makes one's mind mush, as is evidence by my naming MiH Innuendo a couple days back. And the mercilessness of [Russian name here]! Gotcha politics indeed! |
Legy 01.05.2007 20:35 |
Adam Baboolal wrote:And TSMGO, I just read the interview. I'll try to upload a link.artemismoon wrote: Brian has told the "Freddie and Vodka" story on many occasions. I think it was for TSMGO, I can be wrong though.It was Mother Love that that story came from. Adam. He drank Vodka quite often, it was his favorite drink, especially in his last few months. Anything to help with the pain. |
lillian 02.05.2007 03:00 |
^i have heard that too...the pain he must have been in. |
john bodega 02.05.2007 03:15 |
Did he ever put anything in the vodka to make it taste better? |
Legy 02.05.2007 10:07 |
I'm sure Freddie drank the good stuff. Grey Goose is really good vodka, it's really smooth. I sometimes drink it on the rocks, it's that smooth. |
Last Cyborg 02.05.2007 13:25 |
Daniel Nester wrote: As for the other sessions that make up MiH, it's a patchwork of old and recent. Innuendo is as well, to a certain extentReally? I didn't know Innuendo contained any old material.. |
Daniel Nester 02.05.2007 15:04 |
Last Cyborg, I might be wrong about that, but I do think there's some older material on that album, at least vocal-wise. Not a lot, but some, like 1-2 tracks. |
ScottChegg 02.05.2007 17:50 |
Pim Derks wrote: Probably had to do with sucking less cock than in the 80's.Lies lies lies! I get so angry when Freddie is besmirched. He was a bisexual not a homosexual and homosexuals do not "suck cock!" |
ScottChegg 02.05.2007 17:51 |
Pim Derks wrote: Probably had to do with sucking less cock than in the 80's.Lies lies lies! I get so angry when Freddie is besmirched. He was a bisexual not a homosexual and homosexuals do "suck cock!" |
Pim Derks 03.05.2007 05:14 |
Maybe TRS can share 30 seconds of private video of Freddie sucking cock? |
deleted user 04.05.2007 10:42 |
He had throat nodules. He refused treatment for them, because of the tools they would use to treat them were 'kind of scary' and they would end up coming back anyway. |
Pim Derks 04.05.2007 17:45 |
Nodules my ass, I bet they were warts (from all the you know what). |
lillian 05.05.2007 02:51 |
^do u have to be so rude |
saltnvinegar 05.05.2007 04:08 |
Pim Derks wrote: Nodules my ass, I bet they were warts (from all the you know what).Wow, what's with all the references to this subject, are you jealous or something? |
Armando Alejandro Estrada 05.05.2007 17:07 |
saltnvinegar wrote:He's a moron don't you see? He keeps posting all sorts of messages insulting people and saying stupidities.Pim Derks wrote: Nodules my ass, I bet they were warts (from all the you know what).Wow, what's with all the references to this subject, are you jealous or something? |
Asterik 06.05.2007 18:29 |
Well his voice sounded higher on Innuendo, more of a wail than a bark. He could do a lot more with his voice for example sing in the baritone of a disaffected jazz singer on IGSM and in a light falsetto on DTSH. It is true that his voice on that track is very similar to his mid-seventies soud. You get the sense he went for broke on every chorus on Innuendo and the sound was great. In a live setting, however, I prefer his '86 voice. |
galileo_figaro_magnifico 13.05.2007 21:28 |
Henry V wrote: I do prefer that mid-80's hard edge he had on his voice. I find his voice from the innuendo sessions - fantastic range and all - but a little nasal. truly an amazing singneri dunno, maybe it's just me, but do you think Freddie's voice sometimes sounds a little nasal in the 70's as well? not all the time, but on a few occasions...i cant find any examples right now lol, everything i'm trying, he sounds crystal clear, but i notice every now and again... |
Daniel Nester 14.05.2007 09:20 |
There's also the idea of digitally altering his voice -- the technology was fairly widespread by the mid-80s. |
BradJarre 16.05.2007 07:50 |
yeah right. the affect freddies voice with a computer in the studio???. thats SO not true |
The Fairy King 16.05.2007 09:03 |
galileo_figaro_magnifico wrote:Freddie was human...he did get the flu/cold occasionally. :PHenry V wrote: I do prefer that mid-80's hard edge he had on his voice. I find his voice from the innuendo sessions - fantastic range and all - but a little nasal. truly an amazing singneri dunno, maybe it's just me, but do you think Freddie's voice sometimes sounds a little nasal in the 70's as well? not all the time, but on a few occasions...i cant find any examples right now lol, everything i'm trying, he sounds crystal clear, but i notice every now and again... |
deleted user 16.05.2007 11:03 |
saltnvinegar wrote:I think he really is jealous.Pim Derks wrote: Nodules my ass, I bet they were warts (from all the you know what).Wow, what's with all the references to this subject, are you jealous or something? |
beautifulsoup 16.05.2007 16:26 |
<font color=00CCFF>Mercury Lover<h6>HA! wrote: He had throat nodules. He refused treatment for them, because of the tools they would use to treat them were 'kind of scary' and they would end up coming back anyway.Nodes do not come back if you learn to use your voice correctly, and break the habits that led you to develop nodes in the first place. |
deleted user 17.05.2007 11:00 |
beautifulsoup wrote:Are you saying Freddie didn't know how to use his voice? I'm pretty sure he did. Training methods for singers have changed so much. Also, Keep in mind how far medical science has come since the 80's.<font color=00CCFF>Mercury Lover<h6>HA! wrote: He had throat nodules. He refused treatment for them, because of the tools they would use to treat them were 'kind of scary' and they would end up coming back anyway.Nodes do not come back if you learn to use your voice correctly, and break the habits that led you to develop nodes in the first place. |
Killer Queenie 18.05.2007 15:35 |
I think it might have something to do with the course of the disease. Not a hundred percent sure but it may also be down to the fact that he gave up smoking because of his health. |
beautifulsoup 21.05.2007 00:09 |
<font color=0099FF>Mercury Lover<h6>HA! wrote:He could have used his voice much better than he did. I'll leave it at that. :)beautifulsoup wrote:Are you saying Freddie didn't know how to use his voice? I'm pretty sure he did. Training methods for singers have changed so much. Also, Keep in mind how far medical science has come since the 80's.<font color=00CCFF>Mercury Lover<h6>HA! wrote: He had throat nodules. He refused treatment for them, because of the tools they would use to treat them were 'kind of scary' and they would end up coming back anyway.Nodes do not come back if you learn to use your voice correctly, and break the habits that led you to develop nodes in the first place. |
FriedChicken 21.05.2007 15:40 |
<font color=0099FF>Mercury Lover<h6>HA! wrote:Thats right, Freddie didn't know how to use his voice. Thats why he couldn't sing the higher notes live, and why he used to shout a lot (especially in the Works and Magic tour.beautifulsoup wrote:Are you saying Freddie didn't know how to use his voice? I'm pretty sure he did. Training methods for singers have changed so much. Also, Keep in mind how far medical science has come since the 80's.<font color=00CCFF>Mercury Lover<h6>HA! wrote: He had throat nodules. He refused treatment for them, because of the tools they would use to treat them were 'kind of scary' and they would end up coming back anyway.Nodes do not come back if you learn to use your voice correctly, and break the habits that led you to develop nodes in the first place. And also why the first few concerts had Freddie in great vocal shape and then the rest was always not very good. Freddie never had vocal lessons. Some people say Freddie took some vocal lessons when he was recording Barcelona which might be true. But he certainly never had a vocal coach or whatever before 1987. |
Major Tom 21.05.2007 18:39 |
mattsmith wrote: Heaven for everyone was on Made in heaven, not Innuendo. The difference in the way Freddie sings is actually quite big, even from the miracle, to innuendo which was a gap of about 18 months to 2 years. I believe that his voice in the 90's went back to the way it was in the early to mid 70's, delivered with a soaring power and immense range. Just my opinion though. Matt.Made in heaven was recorded for Rogers solo project Shove it with The Cross. Just after the Magic tour if I remember it right. Oh my god I´m such a nerd... |
Major Tom 21.05.2007 18:40 |
henke1980 wrote:Oh, sorry...you know what I mean...mattsmith wrote: Heaven for everyone was on Made in heaven, not Innuendo. The difference in the way Freddie sings is actually quite big, even from the miracle, to innuendo which was a gap of about 18 months to 2 years. I believe that his voice in the 90's went back to the way it was in the early to mid 70's, delivered with a soaring power and immense range. Just my opinion though. Matt.Made in heaven was recorded for Rogers solo project Shove it with The Cross. Just after the Magic tour if I remember it right. Oh my god I´m such a nerd... |
kdj2hot 01.06.2007 17:22 |
Daniel Nester wrote: I think Innuendo is probably a bad place to start looking at how Freddie's voice changed over the years. A lot of those tracks are from his solo recordings, Heaven for Everyone is from The Cross sessions, and still others are from the mid-80s. It might be better to look at how his voice changes from Hot Space --> Works --> A Kind of Magic. To my ears, there's lots of changes in tenor and in range in that time period. Perhaps he smoked even more? Or drank? Some of it, I am sure, is natural as the body gets older.Okay...okay I thought things were bad before I left but atleast people had basic Queen knowledge, this idiot just confused Innuendo with Made in Heaven... geeeeeeeeeeeshhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh |
kdj2hot 01.06.2007 17:27 |
Kiki2 wrote: Maybe because he stopped drinking and smoking. In Innuendo, his voice looked more like the voice he had in the 70's...OMG, you people. Freddie didn't stop drinking, vodka aided him to be able to record at that period. He was smoking well in to 1991, his voice sounded better because they werent touring. End of discussion. I shouldve stopped by here a month ago and this thread wouldnt have been 3 pages long. Official un asshole answer: His voice probably sounded better because they weren't touring. I think Freddie's best vocal period was News of the World era but he didn't just go for it like he did on Innuendo. If you take snippets of Spread your Wings and it's Late his highs are almost similar than on Innuendo. His voice was well rested and he wanted to go out with a bang. |
Winter Land Man 01.06.2007 19:33 |
Bijou In Queens Crown wrote: I think Freddie's voice around '91 is a mix between husky and rough and pure and delicate. On songs like 'Don't Try So Hard' it could have been recorded in the 70s to me. But on 'Hitman' it sounds quite rough like you can tell he's straining on the one and he does sound quite bad. 'The Show Must Go On' is very pure then at the end it has bits where it sounds like he's straining. But on 'Bijou' it's sounds so delicate and fragile. But if you listen to the first album then Innuendo there are obvious differences. I know it's obvious but he sounds alot older in some ways on 'Innuendo'.I don't think it sounds that way at all. And if it did, Freddie would of noticed it and re-did it until he got it to be the best. |
MamaQueen 01.06.2007 20:58 |
I agree with Fried Chicken that Freddie didn't know how to use his voice because he never took lessons and was not trained to be a profesional singer. But if he had taken voice lessons maybe he would not have sang with that rough, edgy voice that he used for the rock songs. I think that the voice lessons would have come in handy for the live concerts so he wouldn't have resorted to screaming like he did in some songs. Maybe that's the reason that I don't like too much to listen to the live concerts cds. His persona, charisma and performance carried him in the concerts not so much his voice. Despite this he had a wonderful, heavenly, spell bounding voice and he knew how to use it in different ways to give each song the mood, and the force each song needed it and transmit it. A group of many things may have affected his voice in the 90-91 period, maybe the stopping smoking, his illness, the weight loss, etc. Now I have to pay more attention to the different albums and observe the difference. |
Winter Land Man 02.06.2007 17:34 |
MamaQueen wrote: I agree with Fried Chicken that Freddie didn't know how to use his voice because he never took lessons and was not trained to be a profesional singer. But if he had taken voice lessons maybe he would not have sang with that rough, edgy voice that he used for the rock songs. I think that the voice lessons would have come in handy for the live concerts so he wouldn't have resorted to screaming like he did in some songs. Maybe that's the reason that I don't like too much to listen to the live concerts cds. His persona, charisma and performance carried him in the concerts not so much his voice. Despite this he had a wonderful, heavenly, spell bounding voice and he knew how to use it in different ways to give each song the mood, and the force each song needed it and transmit it. A group of many things may have affected his voice in the 90-91 period, maybe the stopping smoking, his illness, the weight loss, etc. Now I have to pay more attention to the different albums and observe the difference.Steven Tyler has had many lessons and he sings with a rock voice. Brian Wilson has a vocal coach as well! |
inmydefence 03.06.2007 14:11 |
most of the songs freddie sang on the innuendo album were sang in head voice which is why he has such power and range on this album. weight loss and the fact he stopped smoking will have had a big effect on his voice. if u want detail info on freddie's voice thoughout his career then look no further than here. link great website. |
AndresGuazzelli 17.07.2007 13:31 |
Let's see. Lots of heated discussions here, so I thought I could give myself a try at the thread. IMO, Freddie's post-80s vocal change was in 1988. Around the time of The Works and Kind of Magic, he had certain vocal qualities, and right after Barcelona, he came back with different qualities. He came back with less of an edgier voice, improved low notes, lower tonal center (almost pure baritonical), lower passaggio, and cleaner, brighter, and purer highs. The blend between chest overtones and head overtones changed since Barcelona. He was using his voice wiser, and probably, at the peak of his vocal capacities (as long as the disease allowed him to, right?) My own theory is that his work with Montserrat made him question about his technique. Undoubtly, he came back singing better, more powerful, cleaner, and higher than ever, with better control in his upper range, and his lower range. And, IMO, what is the most amazing feature of them all, is the insane control he has over his voice, specially when one of the symptons of AIDS is losing some control over the voice, both spoken and sung. My guess? Probably Montserrat helped him, technique wise. Such a pity it didn't came before. Best song, vocal wise, in my opinion? All God's People. That song is a vocal marvel ;) And forgive me for my lousy, lousy english. I'm at work, and I shouldn't be wandering around here xD Take care, you guys A. link |
Sebastian 17.07.2007 14:25 |
I agree about the improvement after 'Barcelona'. Not only as singer, but as all-round musician too: after working with Mike he came up with such wonderful tunes like 'Innuendo' and 'Was It All Worth It' ... he'd been nearly 13 years without writing things like those! |
john bodega 17.07.2007 15:31 |
"Was It All Worth It" would definitely be my favourite from their 80's catalogue. It's this sprawling massive thing and I honestly would love to have seen it as a single (probably would've flopped, I don't think the timing would've been right...) It's just so damn... awesome. The whole band shines in that song, beginning to end. |
Dusta 17.07.2007 18:56 |
Wow. What an interesting and insightful post! AndresGuazzelli wrote: Let's see. Lots of heated discussions here, so I thought I could give myself a try at the thread. IMO, Freddie's post-80s vocal change was in 1988. Around the time of The Works and Kind of Magic, he had certain vocal qualities, and right after Barcelona, he came back with different qualities. He came back with less of an edgier voice, improved low notes, lower tonal center (almost pure baritonical), lower passaggio, and cleaner, brighter, and purer highs. The blend between chest overtones and head overtones changed since Barcelona. He was using his voice wiser, and probably, at the peak of his vocal capacities (as long as the disease allowed him to, right?) My own theory is that his work with Montserrat made him question about his technique. Undoubtly, he came back singing better, more powerful, cleaner, and higher than ever, with better control in his upper range, and his lower range. And, IMO, what is the most amazing feature of them all, is the insane control he has over his voice, specially when one of the symptons of AIDS is losing some control over the voice, both spoken and sung. My guess? Probably Montserrat helped him, technique wise. Such a pity it didn't came before. Best song, vocal wise, in my opinion? All God's People. That song is a vocal marvel ;) And forgive me for my lousy, lousy english. I'm at work, and I shouldn't be wandering around here xD Take care, you guys A. link |
Legy 21.07.2007 11:01 |
Wow! You know your sh!t. One of the most insightful post I've read in a long time. |
Asterik 25.07.2007 06:08 |
It is interesting that people have raised weight loss as a potential factor. What definite effect would it have on a voice? There is little evidence of it removing the power because Freddie's voice was very strong on Innuendo, whih was the only album he recorded underweight. Does it make the voice less gravelly maybe? |
Panzerwerk 25.07.2007 08:53 |
Just listen to some of the later demos, like deliah or TMLWKY. These songs show that his voice was not always a powerfull nor controlled... |
The Real Wizard 25.07.2007 11:26 |
Panzerwerk wrote: Just listen to some of the later demos, like deliah or TMLWKY. These songs show that his voice was not always a powerfull nor controlled...That's why they're demos. They're just takes. I don't think their flaws have anything to do with his illness. Great post, Dusta. |
BradJarre 27.07.2007 07:04 |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- It is interesting that people have raised weight loss as a potential factor. What definite effect would it have on a voice? There is little evidence of it removing the power because Freddie's voice was very strong on Innuendo, whih was the only album he recorded underweight. Does it make the voice less gravelly maybe? i think it does quite honestly. if you compare my voice for example with overweight and underweight then you can here that your voice is a hell different. but it also caused because he didnt tour for 5 yyears |