QueenZone discussion #976199

Scott_Mercury wrote: It depends on how bad he needs to cover up stretch marks around the mouth from cocksucking.

Atheist wrote: this pisses me off, how can anyone compare that punk with freddie?? he is nothing like him and no one can ever be

Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote: Why is it that anyone who even remotely resembles Freddie isn't given a chance by some people? What is so wrong with being influenced by somebody?

FriedChicken<br><font size=1>The Almighty</font> wrote:

Scott_Mercury wrote: It depends on how bad he needs to cover up stretch marks around the mouth from cocksucking.

You made my day :D

August R. wrote:

Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote: Why is it that anyone who even remotely resembles Freddie isn't given a chance by some people? What is so wrong with being influenced by somebody?

I think the problem is NOT that he resembles Freddie, but the fact that every Queen forum is filled with topics about him. I mean, he's got nothing to do with Queen, he hasn't worked with any of them, or anything like that. Still, there are lots of topics about him. Now, do we really need a topic about Mika's moustache in here?? Afterall, this is Queenzone, not Mikazone. No wonder some fans are sick and tired of him and don't wanna hear anything about him.

Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote: Why is it that anyone who even remotely resembles Freddie isn't given a chance by some people? What is so wrong with being influenced by somebody? You guys all must hate every rock and metal band of the 70s and 80s, because they were all heavily influenced by Black Sabbath, Zeppelin, and AC/DC.

Atheist wrote: its a blasphemy to even compare someone with freddie. Freddie was the most talented musician of all time + had the best voicer EVER. He was in his own league and all other bands suck in comparision, just watch live aid for proof. The beatles,u2 etc are all garbage compared to queen. This mika guy is just another 1 hit wonder like the darkness who stole queen riffs.

Scott_Mercury wrote: It depends on how bad he needs to cover up stretch marks around the mouth from cocksucking.

August R. wrote: Afterall, this is Queenzone, not Mikazone. No wonder some fans are sick and tired of him and don't wanna hear anything about him.

Atheist wrote: its a blasphemy to even compare someone with freddie. Freddie was the most talented musician of all time + had the best voicer EVER. He was in his own league and all other bands suck in comparision, just watch live aid for proof. The beatles,u2 etc are all garbage compared to queen. This mika guy is just another 1 hit wonder like the darkness who stole queen riffs.

Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote:

August R. wrote: Afterall, this is Queenzone, not Mikazone. No wonder some fans are sick and tired of him and don't wanna hear anything about him.

If some people are somehow weak and stupid enough to grow a distaste for an artist because they see a few topics about him on a forum, then that's their problem.

Atheist wrote: its a blasphemy to even compare someone with freddie. Freddie was the most talented musician of all time + had the best voicer EVER. He was in his own league and all other bands suck in comparision, just watch live aid for proof. The beatles,u2 etc are all garbage compared to queen. This mika guy is just another 1 hit wonder like the darkness who stole queen riffs.

Yay for ignorance!!

Atheist wrote: not really, its called facts

Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote:

Atheist wrote: not really, its called facts

No, it's called your *opinion*. Do you know the difference between an *opinion* and a *fact* ?

August R. wrote: I think the problem is NOT that he resembles Freddie, but the fact that every Queen forum is filled with topics about him. I mean, he's got nothing to do with Queen, he hasn't worked with any of them, or anything like that. Still, there are lots of topics about him. Now, do we really need a topic about Mika's moustache in here?? Afterall, this is Queenzone, not Mikazone. No wonder some fans are sick and tired of him and don't wanna hear anything about him.

<font color=Mercury>Larry Lurex's Girl wrote: ...is Mika gay?

Scott_Mercury wrote:

<font color=Mercury>Larry Lurex's Girl wrote: ...is Mika gay?

No... but the 2 men that double penetrated his ass last night, they are gay as F.

Ferner wrote: link He doesn't look that bad?

vadenuez wrote:

August R. wrote: I think the problem is NOT that he resembles Freddie, but the fact that every Queen forum is filled with topics about him. I mean, he's got nothing to do with Queen, he hasn't worked with any of them, or anything like that. Still, there are lots of topics about him. Now, do we really need a topic about Mika's moustache in here?? Afterall, this is Queenzone, not Mikazone. No wonder some fans are sick and tired of him and don't wanna hear anything about him.

Just take a tour around brian's soapbox. He was the starter of all of this Mika thing.

Sparrow wrote: i feel silly for asking.... is it pronounced my-kah or mee-kah?

August R. wrote: And to Sir GH, this has nothing to do with being stupid or weak, as you suggested in your earlier reply. It's just basic psychology. Attitudes tend to polarize in situations like this, as tastes differ.

Kween<h6>Indeed... wrote:

Sparrow wrote: i feel silly for asking.... is it pronounced my-kah or mee-kah?

I was wondering the same thing! I think it's Mee-kah....:S off subject...But....same thing with David Bowie. How do you pronounce it? BOH-wie or....BA-wie? lmao...random :P

Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote:

August R. wrote: And to Sir GH, this has nothing to do with being stupid or weak, as you suggested in your earlier reply. It's just basic psychology. Attitudes tend to polarize in situations like this, as tastes differ.

Yes, but I'll continue to insist that it's the stupid and weak ones who get sucked into such simplistic polarization. People who uncritically like and dislike artists are the ones who keep our mainstream in full vigour. I will always stand firmly as a reaction to that. The arts should stand for expressiveness and expanding oneself to appreciate new styles of art, but instead it is polluted by a plethora of bland black and white statements made by the majority. Look at the posts in this topic and others. How many people are eloquently explaining why their tastes are what they are? A forum should be a place to discuss things, not to simply have one's beliefs validated by a few equally narrow-minded people who share an opinion. But unfortunately that's what these places often become. &quot;The reason why the mainstream is referred to as a stream is because it's so shallow.&quot; --George Carlin