QueenZone discussion #957551
Paul Rodgers or Robbie Williams
| AP-Racing 03.02.2007 14:52 |
When Brian announced Paul, i will very very surprised. Because Robbie approaches group more What you think about? WATC - Robbie link WATC - Paul link |
| dobo 03.02.2007 15:03 |
Paul Rodgers any day of the week he's such a good singer and doesn't try to be like Freddie at all in Robbie i can see him trying to be like Freddie to much IMHO |
| AP-Racing 03.02.2007 15:18 |
I think Robbie havn't taken because there was a fear that its popularity can eclipse Queen, and set-list would be percent on 40 of Robbie's songs. And that up to concerts in England still it would be not known on what people reacted more, to the Rhapsody or Angels |
| Arnaldo "Ogre-" Silveira 03.02.2007 15:31 |
I prefer what we have now. Cheers, Ogre- |
| L-R-TIGER1994 03.02.2007 16:01 |
Elton John. |
| AP-Racing 03.02.2007 16:04 |
Why Elton? |
| Sharon G.Queen Fan 03.02.2007 16:16 |
None of the above. |
| Nathan 03.02.2007 18:49 |
I think I should sing with them. |
| Mr Faron Hyte 03.02.2007 20:57 |
History has already made the decision. |
| mrjordy 03.02.2007 21:06 |
This has been the topic of conversation for several threads and personally, I am sick of seeing it. In agreement with the post above me, history HAS, indeed, already picked Paul Rodgers for us. Brian May and Roger Taylor, as you all know, are the remaining active members of Queen. They selected Paul Rodgers to tour with them as lead singer in 2005 and 2006 - and as we speak, they are recording an album. Robbie Williams, on the other hand, was not selected. Nor will he ever be. Paul Rodgers is currently fronting Queen, as Freddie Mercury is as dead today as he was yesterday and the day before. I think I speak for most of Queenzone when I say that I am sick of seeing these idiotic, hypothetical threads created mainly to stir up the "fans" and to get another online "Queen 1991 RIP" tirade. Just as a side note, this thread should have been put in PERSONAL, as Robbie Williams has nothing to do with the topic you selected, which is Queen + Paul Rodgers Tour. |
| QUEENROCKS_1991 04.02.2007 07:50 |
Paul Rodger of coz |
| john bodega 04.02.2007 09:54 |
Paul Rodgers. |
| Gratzi 04.02.2007 10:16 |
Paul Rodgers, because it's not up to me... so PR it is... |
| Going Back 04.02.2007 11:45 |
if i compare these two videos then 100% Robbie Williams :) but don't care anyway because they choose Paul, so let it be. |
| KingMercury 04.02.2007 13:02 |
i prefer paul rodgers of course IMHO, he's better vocalist than robbie williams i like robbie, but not to be on stage with queen on the beginning, i said "damm, why didnt they pick up robbie? he's such a good singer" obviously, at that moment, i didnt know paul rodgers... now i can say that, despite he's very different than freddie, paul rodgers is an excelent singer and an terrific showman... i like it and i dont regret Bri and Rog toured with this guy |
| * adventure seeker * 09.02.2007 17:23 |
paul rodgers every time, he isnt tryin to be freddie, yano, so its paul, an it would be like seeing a bad queen tribute band with roger an brian innit, as well, i think vocaly paul can sing the socks off that freddie wanna be, dont get me wrong i havnt got anythin against robbie, but him fronting queen, no.... paul is the only man on earth that can do it |
| on my way up 10.02.2007 05:52 |
Paul Rodgers has a much better voice than Robbie Williams.He's truly a musician. Robbie is a commercially succesful entertainer.I don't have no problem with that but I would have had a problem with robbie and Queen. He can't nail the songs, Paul can! |
| theCro 11.02.2007 06:20 |
Robbie does it very good, so does Paul...i cant answer this question, both are amazing... i'll choose Freddie :) link |
| L-R-TIGER1994 11.02.2007 13:47 |
No Paul no Robbie but Britney Spears. |
| L-R-TIGER1994 11.02.2007 13:49 |
Imagine Britney singing Fat bottomed girls taking her pants off and showing her ass or singing get down make love and making a blow job to the band members,that would really be a MUST to see. |
| theCro 11.02.2007 16:50 |
L-R-TIGER1994 wrote: Imagine Britney singing Fat bottomed girls taking her pants off and showing her ass or singing get down make love and making a blow job to the band members,that would really be a MUST to see.lol i'm horny now |
| Saif 14.02.2007 23:23 |
Robbie Williams is a tree-fucker. He thinks he's Jim Morrison. Damn, Even James Blunt is better than that loser... Paul Rodgers is awesome, really awesome. But seriously for those who like Robbie, look- It's like two things you like, chocolate and onions...but maybe they won't taste so good together. You see what I mean? |
| Nathan 15.02.2007 17:31 |
I have heard it said that we are not seeing the real Queen on stage. I have heard that "Paul" is a secret agent hiding a nuclear warhead in his microphone stand (now I know why he gets so excited on stage), "Brian" is actually bald and is wearing a wig (and probably has sinister intentions too) and "Roger" is a Soviet spy. And "Spike" is a nefarious shapeshifter from another dimension. And Jamie and Danny are closet members of the A-Team. In all seriousness, the new Queen is fantastic and Paul is the best vocallist possible for them. |
| bigV 19.02.2007 04:53 |
Here's a good photo: link Other than that, I'm with my friend from Russia up there - I like Paul, but I would've preferred Robbie! V. |
| violonbleu 19.02.2007 14:31 |
Paul Rodgers or Robbie Williams? At least I'm sure that Robin Williams would be better than Robbie Williams. Of course, Raul Podgers is the greatest. Raul Podgers is a great man. |
| AmeriQueen 25.02.2007 18:19 |
I think Robbie Williams would have been a complete disaster. His voice doesn't suite Queen, nor does it re-invent it like Paul's. Thank goodness it wasn't Robbie Williams. Furthermore, I like that they chose a singer from their generation. |
| Rincewind 01.03.2007 17:53 |
I respect Robbie as entertainer, but he isn't a singer. Grab some clips from the Amsterdam ArenA from last year as listen...... It really hurts... |
| violonbleu 02.03.2007 09:06 |
AmeriQueen wrote: I think Robbie Williams would have been a complete disaster. His voice doesn't suite Queen, nor does it re-invent it like Paul's. Thank goodness it wasn't Robbie Williams. Furthermore, I like that they chose a singer from their generation.I completely agree; and would like to add that Robbie Williams looks to me like a very bad singer, and Paul Rodgers like a very good one. |
| Hitman 04.03.2007 17:59 |
i vote for Paul....he looks like a Brian and Roger schoolmate at the Rock School...and in some way it's true ;) |
