Treasure Moment 27.01.2007 04:44 |
link check it out if you want |
john bodega 27.01.2007 05:34 |
nigger! |
Treasure Moment 27.01.2007 05:57 |
you dont know anything about music so please be quiet zebonka =) |
john bodega 27.01.2007 07:05 |
nigger nigger nigger! |
thomasquinn 32989 27.01.2007 08:09 |
Or just plain bad. Which is my opinion. Your melodies are repetitive and overly simple, too much repetition, too little exploration Your arrangements are mindnumbingly dull The vocals are flat and dull The chord-progressions are clichés |
Mercuryking 27.01.2007 08:50 |
yeah and bands like mika and the beatles are sooo talented in comparision lol |
FriedChicken 27.01.2007 09:28 |
The Beatles are also talented in comparison with Queen |
Treasure Moment 27.01.2007 09:41 |
i think the beatles are crap in comparision to Queen. Queen is FAAAAAR more talented, Queen wrote songs in almost every genre while the beatles wrote songs in the same style all the time, not to mention Queen has THE best singer/frontman/musician of all time. |
Mercuryking 27.01.2007 10:12 |
<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: Or just plain bad. Which is my opinion. Your melodies are repetitive and overly simple, too much repetition, too little exploration Your arrangements are mindnumbingly dull The vocals are flat and dull The chord-progressions are clichésEXCUSE ME, SIMPLE?? did you hear endless void? you call that simple? You probably think that mikas grace kelly is more complex right? well you dont know much bout music my friend. |
thomasquinn 32989 27.01.2007 10:37 |
Mercury SingerOfLife wrote:No, I think "A Love Supreme" is complex. I think "The Prophet's Song" is complex. I think "Sacre Du Printemps" and "Petrushka" are complex.<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: Or just plain bad. Which is my opinion. Your melodies are repetitive and overly simple, too much repetition, too little exploration Your arrangements are mindnumbingly dull The vocals are flat and dull The chord-progressions are clichésEXCUSE ME, SIMPLE?? did you hear endless void? you call that simple? You probably think that mikas grace kelly is more complex right? well you dont know much bout music my friend. I know quite a lot about music actually, thanks. Enough to merit me a Music Theory 201, in fact, and nearly there for the 301. I must say that I find it amusing that you judge me as considering a song complex that I haven't even responded on. It really shows your intellect. |
Mercuryking 27.01.2007 10:57 |
<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote:Apparently you dont know much about music cause if you think Treasure moment is simple then ur crazy.Mercury SingerOfLife wrote:No, I think "A Love Supreme" is complex. I think "The Prophet's Song" is complex. I think "Sacre Du Printemps" and "Petrushka" are complex. I know quite a lot about music actually, thanks. Enough to merit me a Music Theory 201, in fact, and nearly there for the 301. I must say that I find it amusing that you judge me as considering a song complex that I haven't even responded on. It really shows your intellect.<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: Or just plain bad. Which is my opinion. Your melodies are repetitive and overly simple, too much repetition, too little exploration Your arrangements are mindnumbingly dull The vocals are flat and dull The chord-progressions are clichésEXCUSE ME, SIMPLE?? did you hear endless void? you call that simple? You probably think that mikas grace kelly is more complex right? well you dont know much bout music my friend. |
thomasquinn 32989 27.01.2007 11:02 |
Perhaps YOU just don't understand music? Has that thought crossed your mind? Of course not. That's because your ego is cutting off the oxygen that *should* go to your brain. There are few things in this world I know *more* about than music. I've spent half my life learning all I can about it, and am still working on it. I have heard more music and learned from more musicians than I have had meals. |
john bodega 27.01.2007 11:14 |
nigger nigger nigger! |
Treasure Moment 27.01.2007 11:15 |
you obviously dont know anything about music and songwriting thomas, its a simple fact |
Treasure Moment 27.01.2007 11:16 |
Zebonka12 wrote: Endless Void is tedious, not so much because the chords aren't pretty, but it's played really unimaginatively. It's all so samey. Would it kill you to vary things???compared to ALL the popular crap bands out there Treasure Moment makes them look like amateurs, u2, coldplay, mika, you name it |
Saif 27.01.2007 11:17 |
Hmmm...me don't likey too much, but not bad. That MIGHT be a compliment since I consider U2 to be "not bad". What else...? Yeah, good luck for the future I guess, there's always a chance to improve. From Sweden, huh? I've lived there for 4-5 years, can speak the language :)... |
john bodega 27.01.2007 11:18 |
nigger nigger nigger! |
Knute 27.01.2007 11:25 |
OMG...Tresure Moment??? *squeals like a teenager at a 1964 Beatles gig* "Second" best band?? C'mon! You guys are selling yourselves short. Numero uno baby! |
thomasquinn 32989 27.01.2007 11:35 |
Atheist wrote: you obviously dont know anything about music and songwriting thomas, its a simple factLuckily, I can still sleep at nights knowing that the people who know what they are talking about don't agree. |
Mercuryking 27.01.2007 11:53 |
<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: Perhaps YOU just don't understand music? Has that thought crossed your mind? Of course not. That's because your ego is cutting off the oxygen that *should* go to your brain. There are few things in this world I know *more* about than music. I've spent half my life learning all I can about it, and am still working on it. I have heard more music and learned from more musicians than I have had meals.You can study music all your life , doesnt mean you understand music. A real musician is a musician by heart not by studies. You study it cause you aint a musician but most likely want to be. For you to call it simple, i would like you to come up with something more complex. |
thomasquinn 32989 27.01.2007 12:26 |
Mercury SingerOfLife wrote:I did. I named you some already. In fact, the song I'm currently working on is more complex already. And that does not mean it is a very difficult song by a long run!<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: Perhaps YOU just don't understand music? Has that thought crossed your mind? Of course not. That's because your ego is cutting off the oxygen that *should* go to your brain. There are few things in this world I know *more* about than music. I've spent half my life learning all I can about it, and am still working on it. I have heard more music and learned from more musicians than I have had meals.You can study music all your life , doesnt mean you understand music. A real musician is a musician by heart not by studies. You study it cause you aint a musician but most likely want to be. For you to call it simple, i would like you to come up with something more complex. By all means, go ahead playing your music, just deflate your ego. You are not doing something extremely complex, nor are you proficient at what you DO do yet. There is no shame in playing simple stuff (hell, John Lee Hooker stuck with the three-chord-blues in only two keys for most of his life, but he was a genius!), but you have to be really good at what you DO work on. My advise to you: learn something about counterpoint and work on your arrangements. |
kdj2hot 27.01.2007 14:03 |
Atheist wrote: i think the beatles are crap in comparision to Queen. Queen is FAAAAAR more talented, Queen wrote songs in almost every genre while the beatles wrote songs in the same style all the time, not to mention Queen has THE best singer/frontman/musician of all time.The beatles are crap? Okay you're rearded. I was gonna leave my opinion of your band to myself but that statement forced my hand. First of all the music nearly put me to sleep. It' soooooooo dull. NOthing creative about it nor is their anything that stands out. It's a piece of shit compared to Queen or the beatles. Queen influenced? Only if Queen were mindess rtards with synth in front of them and didn't know how to rock. Luckily Queen knew how to oc and yourmusic doesnt rock. It sounds lik pretentious new age crap, wrote by uncreatie types. Just my opinion. By the way the Beatles covered a vaiety of styles, Listen to You Never Give Me Your Nmber or Maxwells Silver Hammer, or Oh Darling, I want you.... You should listen to abbey Road I guessbecaus thats althe songs I'm naming. What really sounded like the title track to Sgt. Pepper a the time|? Not much. The drumming on Strawerrie Fields is amazig, Abbey Road is mind Boggling at how amazing it is. The Beatles wee the best. The only way as far as musicianship goes, (musically they were better than Queen) is drumming, Ringo was amuch better drum compser than Rogr. Rogrs drumming is so boring for the most par. He migt've been physically more talented but Rngos mind was far superior. Maybe if you somewhat really "got" (undrstood) te Beatles o Queen for that matter your music would be better. |
kween-iloveit 27.01.2007 15:47 |
END END END!!! NOW PLEASE. These guys have nothing else to do other than argue that they are the next best thing. Please dont carry this on, this same topic ran for pages and pages last time they posted thier rubbish band. I beg you, for the love of god!!!! |
Mercuryking 27.01.2007 16:25 |
How can someone like the beatles, wanna talk about DULL, thats beatles for you. THE DULLEST most unenergic music ever. |
August R. 27.01.2007 17:33 |
kdj2hot wrote:LOL! Some of the funniest typos ever...Atheist wrote: i think the beatles are crap in comparision to Queen. Queen is FAAAAAR more talented, Queen wrote songs in almost every genre while the beatles wrote songs in the same style all the time, not to mention Queen has THE best singer/frontman/musician of all time.The beatles are crap? Okay you're rearded. I was gonna leave my opinion of your band to myself but that statement forced my hand. First of all the music nearly put me to sleep. It' soooooooo dull. NOthing creative about it nor is their anything that stands out. It's a piece of shit compared to Queen or the beatles. Queen influenced? Only if Queen were mindess rtards with synth in front of them and didn't know how to rock. Luckily Queen knew how to oc and yourmusic doesnt rock. It sounds lik pretentious new age crap, wrote by uncreatie types. Just my opinion. By the way the Beatles covered a vaiety of styles, Listen to You Never Give Me Your Nmber or Maxwells Silver Hammer, or Oh Darling, I want you.... You should listen to abbey Road I guessbecaus thats althe songs I'm naming. What really sounded like the title track to Sgt. Pepper a the time|? Not much. The drumming on Strawerrie Fields is amazig, Abbey Road is mind Boggling at how amazing it is. The Beatles wee the best. The only way as far as musicianship goes, (musically they were better than Queen) is drumming, Ringo was amuch better drum compser than Rogr. Rogrs drumming is so boring for the most par. He migt've been physically more talented but Rngos mind was far superior. Maybe if you somewhat really "got" (undrstood) te Beatles o Queen for that matter your music would be better. like "you're rearded" and "The Beatles wee the best" Anyway, I agree. Anyone who says The Beatles didn't explore different musical styles is either deaf, dumb or has never listened to them. In any case, it's hard to take him seriously as a musician, when he says stupid things like that about the Beatles. |
Mercuryking 27.01.2007 19:10 |
Well the Beatles is the most overrated band in the history of music. They suck monkey balls compared to queen and TM |
drwinston99 27.01.2007 21:25 |
Atheist wrote: i think the beatles are crap in comparision to Queen. Queen is FAAAAAR more talented, Queen wrote songs in almost every genre while the beatles wrote songs in the same style all the time, not to mention Queen has THE best singer/frontman/musician of all time.BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! Hey, thanks for outing yourself for the moronic, no-talent twit that you are so that it spared all of us from listening to your moronic, no-talent music. The Beatles not only changed music, they changed the world. If you're lucky, you might be able to aspire to changing your diaper, dipshit. |
drwinston99 27.01.2007 21:29 |
Oh yeah, and having made the mistake of listening to your music, I'd recommend that you find a piano player that has progressed beyond Introduction to Keyboards Made Easy if you want to get noticed for something other than a complete lack of talent. |
Treasure Moment 27.01.2007 21:35 |
the music is too much for your simple minds im afraid :) |
john bodega 27.01.2007 22:22 |
nigger nigger nigger! |
Treasure Moment 27.01.2007 23:01 |
zebonka you cheezy bastard :P |
teleman 28.01.2007 01:00 |
So I decided to check out your Myspace page and listened to the songs you have up. Not horrible. Not what I'd call groundbreaking. Somewhat derivative. Sounded like 80s pop/rock. This singer sounds more like Lou Reed meets Morrisey trying to sound like Freddie.(BTW I respect Lou Reed, Morrisey and Freddie) The songs aren't complex but complex is not synonymous with good. Sometimes simplicity can take music to a whole other level. The biggest problem I have is that you don't really have anything to do with Queen but promote your band on a Queen discussion board insulting other musicians. Take your deluded arrogance to a more appropriate forum. You might actually achieve a level of competence and achieve greatness but you're a long way from it. If you want complexity try 'On Green Dolphin Street' or 'Giant Steps'. Try Stravinsky. I could name some complex music that is truly awful but I'd rather listen to something simple yet sublime. Trash talk and false bravado may work in the NBA but as an artist posting on a message board you come across as something not worth my time. |
john bodega 28.01.2007 01:48 |
nigger nigger nigger! |
Treasure Moment 28.01.2007 01:54 |
teleman wrote: So I decided to check out your Myspace page and listened to the songs you have up. Not horrible. Not what I'd call groundbreaking. Somewhat derivative. Sounded like 80s pop/rock. This singer sounds more like Lou Reed meets Morrisey trying to sound like Freddie.(BTW I respect Lou Reed, Morrisey and Freddie) The songs aren't complex but complex is not synonymous with good. Sometimes simplicity can take music to a whole other level. The biggest problem I have is that you don't really have anything to do with Queen but promote your band on a Queen discussion board insulting other musicians. Take your deluded arrogance to a more appropriate forum. You might actually achieve a level of competence and achieve greatness but you're a long way from it. If you want complexity try 'On Green Dolphin Street' or 'Giant Steps'. Try Stravinsky. I could name some complex music that is truly awful but I'd rather listen to something simple yet sublime. Trash talk and false bravado may work in the NBA but as an artist posting on a message board you come across as something not worth my time.im just saying compared to the crappy popular bands the music is alot more complex and better written. |
Sweetie 28.01.2007 04:33 |
<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: Perhaps YOU just don't understand music? Has that thought crossed your mind? Of course not. That's because your ego is cutting off the oxygen that *should* go to your brain.What Brain? |
Treasure Moment 28.01.2007 04:35 |
you guys just dont know or understand anything about music, enough said |
Sweetie 28.01.2007 04:41 |
Mercury SingerOfLife wrote: How can someone like the beatles, wanna talk about DULL, thats beatles for you. THE DULLEST most unenergic music ever.oh come on, my attention span hardly lasts for more than 3 seconds and I find the Beatles hells much better than that shit that I heard, I mean I'm not saying my band is any good (mostly because it's James and I and I'm not an octopus) but I know good-enough music when I hear it, and your's was no-where near it, maybe once you explore different things and not be soo...what's the word? oh well, you may be able to make it one day (with a slight bit of luck mind you) |
Treasure Moment 28.01.2007 05:20 |
<font color=Mercury>Larry Lurex's Girl wrote:be silent you talentless fool haha you dont know shit about musicMercury SingerOfLife wrote: How can someone like the beatles, wanna talk about DULL, thats beatles for you. THE DULLEST most unenergic music ever.oh come on, my attention span hardly lasts for more than 3 seconds and I find the Beatles hells much better than that shit that I heard, I mean I'm not saying my band is any good (mostly because it's James and I and I'm not an octopus) but I know good-enough music when I hear it, and your's was no-where near it, maybe once you explore different things and not be soo...what's the word? oh well, you may be able to make it one day (with a slight bit of luck mind you) |
kween-iloveit 28.01.2007 05:25 |
PLEASE STOP, PLEASE STOP, OH MY GOD PLEASE STOP. |
john bodega 28.01.2007 05:37 |
nigger nigger nigger! |
inmydefence 28.01.2007 06:11 |
i'm with thomas on his opinion. there's one simple way to see that he knows what real music is. he's signature is: You were caught in the crossfire of childhood and stardom, blown on the steel breeze. Come on you target for faraway laughter, come on you stranger, you legend, you martyr, and shine! which is of course a lyric from "shine on you crazy diamond". for me, this man must know about real music! i rate pink floyd above the beatles. i find floyds music complex and... awesome! just my opinion. |
john bodega 28.01.2007 06:30 |
nigger! |
thomasquinn 32989 28.01.2007 10:33 |
teleman wrote: So I decided to check out your Myspace page and listened to the songs you have up. Not horrible. Not what I'd call groundbreaking. Somewhat derivative. Sounded like 80s pop/rock. This singer sounds more like Lou Reed meets Morrisey trying to sound like Freddie.(BTW I respect Lou Reed, Morrisey and Freddie) The songs aren't complex but complex is not synonymous with good. Sometimes simplicity can take music to a whole other level. The biggest problem I have is that you don't really have anything to do with Queen but promote your band on a Queen discussion board insulting other musicians. Take your deluded arrogance to a more appropriate forum. You might actually achieve a level of competence and achieve greatness but you're a long way from it. If you want complexity try 'On Green Dolphin Street' or 'Giant Steps'. Try Stravinsky. I could name some complex music that is truly awful but I'd rather listen to something simple yet sublime. Trash talk and false bravado may work in the NBA but as an artist posting on a message board you come across as something not worth my time.You name the two jazz-tunes that are LEAST complex in the Davis/Coltrane oevre. Quite a feat! You want complex music that sounds superb? Try ANYTHING from Charles Mingus' 1964 tour with Eric Dolphy. |
thomasquinn 32989 28.01.2007 10:37 |
Zebonka12 wrote: (forgive me, I'm very drunk and heartbroken at the moment so this may make little sense) "for me, this man must know about real music! i rate pink floyd above the beatles. i find floyds music complex and... awesome! just my opinion." Good sir, to rate one highly is never to cast aspersions on the other! But one must accept that the Beatles came before the Floyd, and for one to exist without the other is nonsensical. I wish our chums in Treasure Moment would acknowledge the invaluable influence that earlier bands have on the music of today. (even if Treasure Moment is just a pale and boring imitation of Joy Divison).The Floyd would *probably* have existed without The Beatles too. They were inspired by the first wave of American psychedelica, as well as the pre-war blues (in fact, the name comes from Pink Anderson and Floyd Council of Dr. Kerr and Blind Boy Fuller fame respectively). Thus, being so thoroughly un-British in their inspiration, they would most likely have come to be anyway. Not necessarily in the exact same musical form, though. |
teleman 28.01.2007 19:31 |
<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: You name the two jazz-tunes that are LEAST complex in the Davis/Coltrane oevre. Quite a feat! You want complex music that sounds superb? Try ANYTHING from Charles Mingus' 1964 tour with Eric Dolphy.Those two were the first off the top of my head. They're accessible to the average listener, even to Treasure Moment(why does that name make me laugh?) Complexity doesn't equal good music but good music can be complex. For Treasure Moment to claim their music is in any way better because of their perception of it as complex is fallacy. It is not complex nor is it better. |
john bodega 28.01.2007 20:29 |
nigger nigger nigger! |
Mercuryking 28.01.2007 20:52 |
teleman wrote:The name is supposed to say Treasure THE moment , but it sounds better without THE.<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: You name the two jazz-tunes that are LEAST complex in the Davis/Coltrane oevre. Quite a feat! You want complex music that sounds superb? Try ANYTHING from Charles Mingus' 1964 tour with Eric Dolphy.Those two were the first off the top of my head. They're accessible to the average listener, even to Treasure Moment(why does that name make me laugh?) Complexity doesn't equal good music but good music can be complex. For Treasure Moment to claim their music is in any way better because of their perception of it as complex is fallacy. It is not complex nor is it better. Well maybe its not the most complex songs but to say its SIMPLE is pure ignorance. |
theCro 28.01.2007 21:22 |
Zebonka12 you are the dumbest creature i've ever met! In my ENTIRE life, whole 22 years, you are lonley sucker, you suck BIG time, stop bullshitting, guy at least tried something, you SUCK Zebonka12, lets hear you and your band! Oh i forgot, no one would want to hang out with you Zebonka12, you little fucking prick, piss off! |
john bodega 28.01.2007 21:33 |
nigger nigger nigger! |
Treasure Moment 30.01.2007 11:16 |
your horror movie was funny as hell haha |
Lester Burnham 30.01.2007 11:39 |
theCro wrote: Zebonka12 you are the dumbest creature i've ever met! In my ENTIRE life, whole 22 years, you are lonley sucker, you suck BIG time, stop bullshitting, guy at least tried something, you SUCK Zebonka12, lets hear you and your band! Oh i forgot, no one would want to hang out with you Zebonka12, you little fucking prick, piss off!ahahahahahahahahaha *breathes* HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA |
john bodega 30.01.2007 12:44 |
nigger nigger nigger! |