deleted user 19.10.2006 18:03 |
link Do you believe in Heather's story how Paul used to beat her up etc..?? personally, she hasn't really convinced me..just another bunch of lies to get his money i reckon..i seriously don't think Paul would have been capable of such abussive behavior..and if he was so abussive over the past 4 years as Heather claims why didn't she just leave him earlier? when it first started happening.. poor paul :( |
Mr.Jingles 19.10.2006 19:24 |
Paul could have never done that. Heather Mills is a leech and we know that Paul is extremely kind to all animals. |
Carol! the Musical 19.10.2006 20:13 |
Mr.Jingles wrote: Paul could have never done that. Heather Mills is a leech and we know that Paul is extremely kind to all animals.Wow... amen to that. |
user name 19.10.2006 20:15 |
<font color="#33FFFF">Capt'JessicaSparow wrote: and if he was so abussive over the past 4 years as Heather claims why didn't she just leave him earlier? when it first started happening..Regardless of the veracity of this particular event, of which we may never know, this statement I quoted is clearly not indicative of a familiar knowledge of abusive relationships. Anyway, we all know that John was the woman beater of the group. And it's strange (or perhaps even scary) how many of you are so certain as to what actually did or did not happen... |
***Marial-B*** 19.10.2006 20:40 |
Paul is my least fav beatle, and I know he's not like that about beating women... but he's a dumbass for not doing a prenup!!!!!!! |
Donna13 19.10.2006 21:02 |
I've heard the British papers are full of stories on this. We aren't getting too much at all. It's a shame anyone would dislike anyone else so much. |
blerp 19.10.2006 21:07 |
My friend actually believed that. She told me how she and her family had dinner with the Beatle's previous manager. I was like, 'Er...how? And I don't believe the Paul thing for one second.' What is my friend talking about, having dinner with the manager? |
***Marial-B*** 19.10.2006 21:09 |
As far as I'm concerned... Brian Epstein is dead from 1967... -.-' |
Carol! the Musical 19.10.2006 21:25 |
<font color=#CC66CC>Marial-B wrote: As far as I'm concerned... Brian Epstein is dead from 1967... -.-'I was thinking that...! |
wstüssyb 19.10.2006 21:55 |
What a bitch! I should play fetch her with her fake leg :) |
iGSM 20.10.2006 01:37 |
Could have been Allan Williams... Yes, John was the wife beater and I think Ringo was a bit of a thrasher too. I doubt that these allegations are true - AT ALL. *refuses to even believe Paul did LSD and he was the King of the Beatles* However it saddens me that Paul mightn't go on tour after this! Damned women! Go..become men. |
M a t i a s M a y 20.10.2006 02:33 |
GOOO PAULLL BEAT THE SHIT OUT OF THAT BITCH!! :D |
The Fairy King 20.10.2006 02:52 |
M a t i a s M a y<h6><i>QZ's Rainmaker wrote: GOOO PAULLL BEAT THE SHIT OUT OF THAT BITCH!! :DI second that. |
Donna13 20.10.2006 08:59 |
Give me a break, people. I know you must be kidding. How is beating up anyone going to solve any problems? I don't care how nasty anyone is. If you take it to a physical level, not only are you sinking to the lowest low, but you also never know what you are going to get back. |
Joeker 20.10.2006 11:20 |
ringo starr is like the coolest beatle, without him there would be no yellow submarine |
iGSM 20.10.2006 12:27 |
...well...there'd be no vocals to the track of Yellow Submarine... Or drummer named Ringo Starr for the Beatles. Imagine that...Pete Best still playing drums for 'em *shudder* |
Mr.Jingles 20.10.2006 12:27 |
kingarthur wrote: ringo starr is like the coolest beatle, without him there would be no yellow submarine... without Ringo there would have been a legend called Pete Best. |
john bodega 20.10.2006 12:29 |
Well... I feel a bit like smacking her. But in truth, I have two words for her : DOUGLAS BADER. There's an amputee hero. This woman is just a psychopath who knows damn well she's never going to get another shot at this much money and this much publicity. She seems to have made her life an exercise in re-writing or watering down things she's embarrassed about ("No I was never a prostitute, I was just an escort..." yeah right). All that 'crawling to the toilet' crap doesn't fool me at all. The only claim she made that I can believe would be Paul shouting 'UNGRATEFUL BITCH' at her. Because heck, I agree with him. Poor guy lost his wife of 20-something years a couple of years ago and all she can do is make life difficult. |
Legy 20.10.2006 14:03 |
Poor Paul, he's just a hopeless romantic. He lost the love of his life and then comes this "woman". He was hurting and she took advantage of him. She was only out for Paul's money. First off, you married a Beatles! Of course he's going to drink and smoke pot! Don't you know your Beatles history?! Paul would never hit a woman. I hope this "woman" gets what she deserves, nothing! Of course, we really don't know what actually happened. |
deleted user 20.10.2006 16:06 |
Scandal - now you've left me all the worlds gonna know - Scandal - they're gonna turn our lives into a freak show, They'll see the heart-ache, they'll see the love break, They'll hear me pleading, I'll say for God's sake Over - and over - and over - again - Scandal - now you've left me there's no healing the wounds, Hey scandal, and all the world can make us out to be fools, Here come the bad news, open the flood-gates - They'll leave us bleeding, we say you cheapskates Over - and over - and over - again So let them know when they stare, it's just a private affair - They'll have us hung in the air and tell me what do they care, It's only a life to be twisted and broken - They'll see the heart-ache, they'll see our love break - yeah, They'll hear me pleading, Ill say for God's sake Over - and over - and over - and over - again - Scandal, scandal, Scandal, yes you're breaking my heart again - Today the headlines, tomorrow hard times, And no-one ever really knows the truth from the lies - And in the end the story deeper must hide, Deeper - and deeper - and deeper - inside Scandal, scandal... |
user name 20.10.2006 17:49 |
I don't like most of you now. You all make too many stupid, baseless assumptions just because you are Beatles fans. This is why the judicial system fails. Hard. |
deleted user 20.10.2006 18:24 |
Zebonka12 wrote: There's an amputee hero. This woman is just a psychopath who knows damn well she's never going to get another shot at this much money and this much publicity. She seems to have made her life an exercise in re-writing or watering down things she's embarrassed about ("No I was never a prostitute, I was just an escort..." yeah right). All that 'crawling to the toilet' crap doesn't fool me at all. The only claim she made that I can believe would be Paul shouting 'UNGRATEFUL BITCH' at her. Because heck, I agree with him. Poor guy lost his wife of 20-something years a couple of years ago and all she can do is make life difficult.I know!!! When i first saw the articles in the newspapers (believe me they're in practically every paper in london) i was really shocked and reaaaaallllllllllly angry!!! This stupid woman is trying to steal Macca's millions by accusing him of stabbing her and basically abusing her! I just feel that this is not what a 64 man should have to be put through..and i seriously can't imagine him as the violent person she claims him to be!.. DCM wrote: this is a good topic(cjs.).i would be shocked to learn that paul has ever abused a woman. he seemed to adore his first wife.er, Thanks!! xD i know..he adored Linda! |
Legy 20.10.2006 18:25 |
Got that right. |
teleman 20.10.2006 20:15 |
I saw these tasteless comments on another forum. While finding these offensive I still laughed.
Paul's lawyer said they'll throw it out of court because She doesn't have a leg to stand on. She used to work at IHOP before she met Paul but she quit because the patrons kept tipping her. You can't blame her for latching on to Paul since she's just trying to get a leg up. |
Mr.Jingles 20.10.2006 20:52 |
<b><font color=666600>Music Man wrote: I don't like most of you now....but I thought you said you loved me? What about all the promises you made of spending the rest of our lives together? What about all the endless hours we spent making love and all the good times we shared together? I'm sorry if my Heather Mills comment hurt your feelings, but I guess it's all over now. * sniff * |
user name 20.10.2006 21:13 |
Mr.Jingles wrote:We can have make-up sex later. But now all you get is angry sex. Take off your pants.<b><font color=666600>Music Man wrote: I don't like most of you now....but I thought you said you loved me? What about all the promises you made of spending the rest of our lives together? What about all the endless hours we spent making love and all the good times we shared together? I'm sorry if my Heather Mills comment hurt your feelings, but I guess it's all over now. * sniff * |
john bodega 20.10.2006 23:24 |
<b><font color=666600>Music Man wrote: I don't like most of you now. You all make too many stupid, baseless assumptions just because you are Beatles fans. This is why the judicial system fails. Hard.No dumbass. They aren't baseless assumptions. It's common sense. Logic. Reasoning. If there were a famous personality I really hated, I'd probably still leap to their defense if they had no prior history of any of this bullshit. We all fucking know Paul McCartney loves himself and has a bit of a temper. But the shit that this silly bitch is claiming is just off the planet. It's nonsense. Fiction. She would have to have killer evidence to the contrary to change my mind on this. How is anyone supposed to believe a word she says when everything else she ever says is total nonsense? "Crawling to the toilet?" PLEASE. I never saw Douglas Bader crawling to the toilet. |
user name 21.10.2006 00:48 |
Zebonka12 wrote:There is no logic. The only way to dismiss these claims with logic is to prove that they are impossible. I think that, despite the fact that it is more likely than not that the claims are false, these claims are still very far from being impossible.<b><font color=666600>Music Man wrote: I don't like most of you now. You all make too many stupid, baseless assumptions just because you are Beatles fans. This is why the judicial system fails. Hard.No dumbass. They aren't baseless assumptions. It's common sense. Logic. Reasoning. If there were a famous personality I really hated, I'd probably still leap to their defense if they had no prior history of any of this bullshit. We all fucking know Paul McCartney loves himself and has a bit of a temper. But the shit that this silly bitch is claiming is just off the planet. It's nonsense. Fiction. She would have to have killer evidence to the contrary to change my mind on this. How is anyone supposed to believe a word she says when everything else she ever says is total nonsense? "Crawling to the toilet?" PLEASE. I never saw Douglas Bader crawling to the toilet. It is an assumption based on belief rather than logic that if wealthy person A is accused by spouse/person B of something that may result in divorce/lawsuit, then B's intentions are purely financial, and s/he is lying. |
Mr.Jingles 21.10.2006 01:04 |
<b><font color=666600>Music Man wrote:YIPEEE!!Mr.Jingles wrote:We can have make-up sex later. But now all you get is angry sex. Take off your pants.<b><font color=666600>Music Man wrote: I don't like most of you now....but I thought you said you loved me? What about all the promises you made of spending the rest of our lives together? What about all the endless hours we spent making love and all the good times we shared together? I'm sorry if my Heather Mills comment hurt your feelings, but I guess it's all over now. * sniff * I'll bring the bottle of KY |
user name 21.10.2006 01:13 |
Mr.Jingles wrote:That won't be necessary.<b><font color=666600>Music Man wrote:YIPEEE!! I'll bring the bottle of KYMr.Jingles wrote:We can have make-up sex later. But now all you get is angry sex. Take off your pants.<b><font color=666600>Music Man wrote: I don't like most of you now....but I thought you said you loved me? What about all the promises you made of spending the rest of our lives together? What about all the endless hours we spent making love and all the good times we shared together? I'm sorry if my Heather Mills comment hurt your feelings, but I guess it's all over now. * sniff * |
john bodega 21.10.2006 01:17 |
<b><font color=666600>Music Man wrote:If Paul McCartney has an undiagnosed brain tumour the size of a baseball that is affecting his behaviour, then maybe some of this shit would make sense.Zebonka12 wrote:There is no logic. The only way to dismiss these claims with logic is to prove that they are impossible. I think that, despite the fact that it is more likely than not that the claims are false, these claims are still very far from being impossible. It is an assumption based on belief rather than logic that if wealthy person A is accused by spouse/person B of something that may result in divorce/lawsuit, then B's intentions are purely financial, and s/he is lying.<b><font color=666600>Music Man wrote: I don't like most of you now. You all make too many stupid, baseless assumptions just because you are Beatles fans. This is why the judicial system fails. Hard.No dumbass. They aren't baseless assumptions. It's common sense. Logic. Reasoning. If there were a famous personality I really hated, I'd probably still leap to their defense if they had no prior history of any of this bullshit. We all fucking know Paul McCartney loves himself and has a bit of a temper. But the shit that this silly bitch is claiming is just off the planet. It's nonsense. Fiction. She would have to have killer evidence to the contrary to change my mind on this. How is anyone supposed to believe a word she says when everything else she ever says is total nonsense? "Crawling to the toilet?" PLEASE. I never saw Douglas Bader crawling to the toilet. All prior accounts of this guys temper just make him sound like a reeeal asshole at times... sure as hell not an overly violent, keep-my-wife-in-the-cellar kind of maniac thats being portrayed. Unless there's been some kind of paradigm shift behind closed doors, one cannot reconcile these claims with 45 years of observations by thousands of people. We all know he can be a jerk (gotta love that book "The Love You Make" or whatever it is) but... This crap is bumpkis. I don't believe it anymore than I believed Pete Townshend was into kiddy porn - and the truth came out in good time that he wasn't. I mean shits sake, I'm not saying any of this because I'm fond of him. I've never liked Paul McCartney! It just sounds like bullshit. It's not the first time she's lied, and it won't be the last. She's some kind of compulsive liar, and who knows - maybe she'll get the needed treatment when this shit is over. Y'all can report back here and say I TOLD YOU SO if he's ever proven guilty, but for now I have to say it - Heather Mills is talking out of her busted arse again. |
Donna13 21.10.2006 09:50 |
The fact that they found each other in the first place might be because they deserved one another ... a little bit maybe? I really haven't read up on these stories, but from what I have heard, it sounds like neither party is heart broken - so at least that's good. |
rocks. 21.10.2006 10:13 |
no fucking way Paul FUCKING McCaartney would do bullshit like that, he's always such a sweetheart!! I really hope it comes out that Heather Mills leaked the papares (which I bet she did) and that they werent true, and she gets NOTHING. |
user name 21.10.2006 13:33 |
WhatMustHeThink wrote: no fucking way Paul FUCKING McCaartney would do bullshit like that, he's always such a sweetheart!! I really hope it comes out that Heather Mills leaked the papares (which I bet she did) and that they werent true, and she gets NOTHING.This is the kind of post I'm really talking about. Not specifically the people who actually put some thought into it, like Zebonka. I bet there are people out there who refuse to believe that John Lennon beat girls. |
deleted user 21.10.2006 14:27 |
<b><font color=666600>Music Man wrote:I understand where you're coming from and i'm not saying that because Paul was in the Beatles and the Beatles were great so he's great so he is definatly innocent, i just think that Heather is lying..WhatMustHeThink wrote: no fucking way Paul FUCKING McCaartney would do bullshit like that, he's always such a sweetheart!! I really hope it comes out that Heather Mills leaked the papares (which I bet she did) and that they werent true, and she gets NOTHING.This is the kind of post I'm really talking about. Not specifically the people who actually put some thought into it, like Zebonka. I bet there are people out there who refuse to believe that John Lennon beat girls. ..because think about it once she realised how much she could get out of this divorce she musta been over the moon..cmon she could walk out of it with a LOT of money (which i think is totally bang outa order since she didn't EARN it) ..and knowing that she might've intentionally leaked these allegations to the papers (i wouldn't put it past her) but hey she COULD be the innocent party in this, but from where i'm standing she seriously doesn't look it.. |
magicalfreddiemercury 21.10.2006 14:31 |
<b><font color=666600>Music Man wrote:Oooo! Ouch!!Mr.Jingles wrote:That won't be necessary.<b><font color=666600>Music Man wrote:YIPEEE!! I'll bring the bottle of KYMr.Jingles wrote:We can have make-up sex later. But now all you get is angry sex. Take off your pants.<b><font color=666600>Music Man wrote: I don't like most of you now....but I thought you said you loved me? What about all the promises you made of spending the rest of our lives together? What about all the endless hours we spent making love and all the good times we shared together? I'm sorry if my Heather Mills comment hurt your feelings, but I guess it's all over now. * sniff * Seriously - not one of us knows what went on between those two. Her story is bizarre to say the least - the dragging herself bit, for instance, is beyond belief. But there might be some truth mixed in there. An abused woman - not saying she was one, BUT - doesn't run out at the first hint of trouble, as someone suggested in this thread. An abused woman stays for various reasons. Terror. No self-esteem. The belief she deserves the punishment. Embarrassment. Fear of not being believed. When a woman finally makes the break from an abusive relationship, she usually has a litany of events that added to her mental and emotional abuse - not only her physical abuse. Individually, they might not sound legitimate to everyone else, but living through all the events adds weight to each. Meaning, while Mills' comments sound far-fetched to most of us, if abuse was involved (giant IF), every tiny thing done to her was etched in her mind the same as a punch is etched in a gut. Abuse isn't just physical. It's manipulative. It's complete and it's swift. And sometimes the last guy you'd ever expect of being the abuser is actually the one to fear most. |
user name 21.10.2006 21:55 |
magicalfreddiemercury wrote:Good post. Whether or not it is relevant to what happened, it shows an understanding of abusive relationships that most people do not have.<b><font color=666600>Music Man wrote:Oooo! Ouch!! Seriously - not one of us knows what went on between those two. Her story is bizarre to say the least - the dragging herself bit, for instance, is beyond belief. But there might be some truth mixed in there. An abused woman - not saying she was one, BUT - doesn't run out at the first hint of trouble, as someone suggested in this thread. An abused woman stays for various reasons. Terror. No self-esteem. The belief she deserves the punishment. Embarrassment. Fear of not being believed. When a woman finally makes the break from an abusive relationship, she usually has a litany of events that added to her mental and emotional abuse - not only her physical abuse. Individually, they might not sound legitimate to everyone else, but living through all the events adds weight to each. Meaning, while Mills' comments sound far-fetched to most of us, if abuse was involved (giant IF), every tiny thing done to her was etched in her mind the same as a punch is etched in a gut. Abuse isn't just physical. It's manipulative. It's complete and it's swift. And sometimes the last guy you'd ever expect of being the abuser is actually the one to fear most.Mr.Jingles wrote:That won't be necessary.<b><font color=666600>Music Man wrote:YIPEEE!! I'll bring the bottle of KYMr.Jingles wrote:We can have make-up sex later. But now all you get is angry sex. Take off your pants.<b><font color=666600>Music Man wrote: I don't like most of you now....but I thought you said you loved me? What about all the promises you made of spending the rest of our lives together? What about all the endless hours we spent making love and all the good times we shared together? I'm sorry if my Heather Mills comment hurt your feelings, but I guess it's all over now. * sniff * I swear, I can't even tell you how many times I've heard ignorant statements of, "If she was being abused, then why didn't she just leave the first time it happened?" when abusive relationships are being discussed. |
john bodega 21.10.2006 22:58 |
"I bet there are people out there who refuse to believe that John Lennon beat girls." It always seemed pretty obvious to me.... he had a hell of a skewiff formative years and a temper from hell. I wasn't surprised to hear he was the hitting kind. I mean granted, in later years he did try and turn it around, but all the same; there's no sense in fans pretending it didn't happen, eh? |
iGSM 22.10.2006 00:01 |
I wouldn't have minded a barney with ol' Lennzie. I'm sure I'd've come out second best. |
magicalfreddiemercury 22.10.2006 09:29 |
<b><font color=666600>Music Man wrote: I swear, I can't even tell you how many times I've heard ignorant statements of, "If she was being abused, then why didn't she just leave the first time it happened?" when abusive relationships are being discussed.I've heard that statement more often than I can say. It's a concept people can't seem to grasp. In a way, I understand. Logic says if a guy hits a girl, she should be shocked and pissed off enough to either hit him back or leave him. Trouble is, by the time the first blow comes, she's already been worked over by him emotionally. She's in love with him and believes he's in love with her. She'll look back and try to figure out what SHE did to set him off. By the time she realizes HE's the problem, he's probably isolated her from friends and family. He's probably limited her ability to take care of herself financially so that she's dependent on him. There are so many issues people will never understand. The main one being that the abused woman often believes she has no choice but to stay with her abuser. |
deleted user 22.10.2006 13:07 |
I saw a cover of News of the World (don't worry, I wasn't reading it) saying Heather abused Paul! I don't have much time for Heather, I think she was silly and short-sighted for marrying a man 26 years her junior, marrying one of the worlds most famous musicians, after the death of his first beloved wife, and expecting it to last with her getting off scot-free with no angry backlash whatsoever. Still I definitely don't think one of them abusing the other type rumours are true, I could understand Heather throwing something or wrecking something in the heat of a fight, or Paul yelling 'YOU STUPID BITCH,' 'cos every married couple hits the rocks once in a while! |
Poo, again 22.10.2006 13:12 |
Heather is such a bitch. Macca would never do anything to harm her. Though he might now. |
***Marial-B*** 22.10.2006 13:20 |
iGSM wrote: Could have been Allan Williams...You're right here hun... and about Pete Best... *shudders*... Besides, Ringo is the coolest Cancer after moi, we even were born the same day xD |
eenaweena 23.10.2006 09:55 |
heather mills sucks. i hate her. i know and everyone knows that that idiot is lying. paul mcartney would never do such a thing. if he did, then he would've done it to linda too. which he didn't. i hope she and her wooden leg burn together. why are the beatles' wives all weird? paul has that idiot, and john has yoko. i don't like yoko either. |
AspiringPhilosophe 23.10.2006 10:16 |
magicalfreddiemercury wrote:Excellent Post! You obviously understand how messy these relationships can be. My cousin was in one for alittle while, but luckily she managed to get out. Now, one would think that when he hit her before their wedding, that would have put a stop to the wedding AT THAT MOMENT. I know it would have with me. But she continued with the wedding and married him anyway. She didn't realize how wrong the whole thing was until he did it again in front of their son, and that was her limit. Everyone has a limit, it's just that some have a limit that is so high they wind up dead before they hit it. There are lots of reasons women (and men who are abused...it does happen) stay. Fear of reprisal, fear of being alone for the rest of their lives, threats to family or friends, low self value, habit, belief that the person will change, belief that they can change the person, protection of others, embrassment, or sometimes they truly love the person. Not saying that Paul is guilty here....that's not for us to decide. But for all those who argue that she should have left immediately if this does happen to be true, look at the argument you are saying. Emotions are a very messy thing, and humans by nature have them. What is a very logical thing to do doesn't mean crap in a situation like this, because emotions of all kinds are involved. And since when have emotions ever been predictable or logical?<b><font color=666600>Music Man wrote: I swear, I can't even tell you how many times I've heard ignorant statements of, "If she was being abused, then why didn't she just leave the first time it happened?" when abusive relationships are being discussed.I've heard that statement more often than I can say. It's a concept people can't seem to grasp. In a way, I understand. Logic says if a guy hits a girl, she should be shocked and pissed off enough to either hit him back or leave him. Trouble is, by the time the first blow comes, she's already been worked over by him emotionally. She's in love with him and believes he's in love with her. She'll look back and try to figure out what SHE did to set him off. By the time she realizes HE's the problem, he's probably isolated her from friends and family. He's probably limited her ability to take care of herself financially so that she's dependent on him. There are so many issues people will never understand. The main one being that the abused woman often believes she has no choice but to stay with her abuser. |
magicalfreddiemercury 25.10.2006 10:57 |
So, is this implying she didn't make those claims against Paul or that she's pissed off about the backlash? I'm not getting the point of her suit against the papers. link |
john bodega 25.10.2006 12:07 |
I'm baffled. I'll tell you one thing though, a charity campaigner shouldn't be contemplating getting that much money from divorce proceedings. It's a little disingenuous, isn't it?? So what are they trying to say; that all that crap was leaked, therefore that IS what she is claiming? And that she's just annoyed that everyone found out the 'awful truth' in the paper? I'm so past caring about this shit now. Haha. |
iGSM 25.10.2006 12:16 |
Too right. Deary me, Paul. |
Legy 25.10.2006 12:59 |
I wonder what Freddie would do if he were in Paul's shoes? |
magicalfreddiemercury 25.10.2006 14:38 |
artemismoon wrote: I wonder what Freddie would do if he were in Paul's shoes?He'd write a new song titled, "Death On One Leg" :) |
Mr.Jingles 26.10.2006 09:12 |
magicalfreddiemercury wrote:LMAOartemismoon wrote: I wonder what Freddie would do if he were in Paul's shoes?He'd write a new song titled, "Death On One Leg" :) |
M a t i a s M a y 26.10.2006 13:07 |
xDDDDDD |
***Marial-B*** 26.10.2006 13:37 |
<font color="indigo"><b>friedchicken \m/ wrote: heather mills sucks. i hate her. i know and everyone knows that that idiot is lying. paul mcartney would never do such a thing. if he did, then he would've done it to linda too. which he didn't. i hope she and her wooden leg burn together. why are the beatles' wives all weird? paul has that idiot, and john has yoko. i don't like yoko either.Heather took the crown this time of the greediest Beatles' wife... |
eenaweena 27.10.2006 07:55 |
<font color=#CC66CC>Marial-B wrote:amen.<font color="indigo"><b>friedchicken \m/ wrote: heather mills sucks. i hate her. i know and everyone knows that that idiot is lying. paul mcartney would never do such a thing. if he did, then he would've done it to linda too. which he didn't. i hope she and her wooden leg burn together. why are the beatles' wives all weird? paul has that idiot, and john has yoko. i don't like yoko either.Heather took the crown this time of the greediest Beatles' wife... |
magicalfreddiemercury 27.10.2006 11:14 |
This is gossipy but interesting nonetheless - link |
YourValentine 27.10.2006 12:04 |
... |
Mr.Jingles 27.10.2006 12:06 |
<font color=#CC66CC>Marial-B wrote:Yoko might be the greediest. With all the hundreds of millions she has received from royalties coming from John's compositions she has nothing to whine about.<font color="indigo"><b>friedchicken \m/ wrote: heather mills sucks. i hate her. i know and everyone knows that that idiot is lying. paul mcartney would never do such a thing. if he did, then he would've done it to linda too. which he didn't. i hope she and her wooden leg burn together. why are the beatles' wives all weird? paul has that idiot, and john has yoko. i don't like yoko either.Heather took the crown this time of the greediest Beatles' wife... |
flash! 28068 27.10.2006 13:22 |
Bring back Linda... pul-ezzzz! |
deleted user 27.10.2006 14:36 |
magicalfreddiemercury wrote:ROFL!!!artemismoon wrote: I wonder what Freddie would do if he were in Paul's shoes?He'd write a new song titled, "Death On One Leg" :) i feel sorry for their kid though..what an awkward situation for her to be in! |