deleted user 05.10.2006 15:10 |
24 October 1982 Venue: Hankyu Nishinomiyakyujo City: Osaka/Nishinomiya Country: Japan Quality: EX- Lineage: "Stadium Rock" (Wardour) silvers->CD-R(x)->EAC->WAV->FLAC (Flac frontend level 8) Tracklist: CD1: 1. Flash 2. The Hero 3. We Will Rock You (Fast) 4. Action This Day 5. Somebody To Love 6. Calling All Girls 7. Now I'm Here/Impromptu 8. Put Out The Fire 9. Dragon Attack/Now I'm Here (Reprise) 10. Love Of My Life 11. Impromptu 12. Save Me 13. Get Down, Make Love 14. Guitar Solo CD2: 1. Body Language 2. Under Pressure 3. Fat Bottomed Girls 4. Crazy Little Thing Called Love 5. Spread Your Wings 6. Saturday Night's Alright For Fighting 7. Bohemian Rhapsody 8. Tie Your Mother Down 9. Another One Bites The Dust 10. Jailhouse Rock (incl. Brown Sugar) 11. Whole Lotta Shakin' Goin' On 12. We Will Rock You 13. We Are The Champions 14. God Save The Queen Comment: Complete mastertape, the common source is incomplete and from LP, THIS IS NOT. Rare songs like Spread Your Wings, Saturday Night's Alright For Fighting, Jailhouse Rock (incl. Rolling Stones' song Brown Sugar) and Whole Lotta Shakin' Goin' On was played during this concert. DO NOT SHARE THIS IN ANY FORM OF LOSSY FORMAT (WHICH MEANS MP3, WMA, OGG ETC.) Convert to lossy only for personal use. If this gets shared in any form of lossy format I will stop sharing. Lineage should always be included as information in trades. Enjoy!!! Feel free to make a torrent of this recording, only if it stays lossless. CD1: Part 1: link Part 2: link Part 3: link Part 4: link Part 5: link CD2: Part 6: link Part 7: link Part 8: link Part 9: link |
Pierre 05.10.2006 15:22 |
thanx very nice ! |
Sithmarauder 05.10.2006 15:37 |
Thank you very much! |
Another Person 05.10.2006 16:08 |
thanks bunchz Joachim |
fernandosales 05.10.2006 16:09 |
Thanks man. DL now! |
andy1962 05.10.2006 16:10 |
thanks for this really gratfull i will download tomorrow as i have a few things on the go at the moment,so glad to have some nice shows on here. many thanks |
vivequeen 05.10.2006 16:30 |
MERCI BEAUCOUP |
Marknow 05.10.2006 16:43 |
Good work Fella. |
deleted user 05.10.2006 16:45 |
Everything is now uploaded. |
andy1962 05.10.2006 17:06 |
could not resist it i have stopped what i was doing and am now finishing downloading the last 4 parts should have them in about ten minutes.is it best to burn striaght to disc?which is best program to use to listen to on pc?thank you for this.a blue peter badge is on it's way to you as i speak.lol....let,s hope we all get some great queen shows here now like this and sir gh.let see what the others have to offer????????? once again thank you very much********** |
andy1962 05.10.2006 17:30 |
just burned to disc and listening to it now.nice quality in fact first class.well done and thank you for this |
deleted user 05.10.2006 18:11 |
Hey andy1962, I'm glad you're positive to flac's now. I'll share some more in the future. The best way to burn is: FLAC->Flac frontend->Decode->WAV->Nero, then burn without pauses with 16x speed. That will do :-) |
Tim June 05.10.2006 19:40 |
Super! Thank you very much, for this great concert in this sound quality. Much better then Get Down vinyl bootleg. It's a joy to listen. |
The Real Wizard 06.10.2006 01:24 |
andy1962 wrote: is it best to burn striaght to disc?which is best program to use to listen to on pc?thank you for thisI'd say your best bet is to download WinAmp, and the FLAC plugin for WinAmp. As for burning, I'd recommend burning DVD-ROMs. They're just as cheap as CDRs, so why not? Have they invented a portable player that supports FLAC yet? If not, then I hope they do soon! |
TheGame 06.10.2006 02:33 |
Nice to see something actually happening, and perhaps we get the snowball running ourselves. I've decided to share something from my collection also in lossless. I dont know what yet. However, i have to wait until i've fixed my computer. Yes, it have died again, unbelievable! |
The Real Wizard 06.10.2006 02:42 |
TheGame wrote: Nice to see something actually happening, and perhaps we get the snowball running ourselves. I've decided to share something from my collection also in lossless. I dont know what yet. However, i have to wait until i've fixed my computer. Yes, it have died again, unbelievable!Ah man, I'm sorry to hear that... again! |
PBB 06.10.2006 02:49 |
THX. |
928 06.10.2006 03:21 |
(use nero express to burn & dont forget to tick the box to remove the 2 second gaps between songs) Flac plugin for nero..... link follow the instructions to install and then burn your lossless flacs in nero as you would your orrible ,nasty ,lossy mp3's...hehehe. Now you have EXACTLY what was recorded on THE night. LOSSLESS v LOSSY I try to keep my terminology straight. In other words, I refer to lossy codecs as encoders, and lossless codecs as compressors. It's a subtle difference, and one you'll see ignored by some people, who use the terms interchangably [encoder & compressor]. But lossless codecs do not "encode" per se. They merely compress [crunch]. Lossy codecs, on the other hand, do more than compress: they encode, which involves discarding selected bits deemed unnecessary. It's a known fact that the human ear has difficulty detecting a soft note played immediately after a loud one [e.g. a quiet whisper following a loud shout]. The lossy encoder will see this and discard the bits representing soft notes immediately following loud ones. The goal here is to generate a smaller file with [hopefully] minimal loss of audio fidelity. It's also known that humans have trouble hearing sounds above 16-KHz. This is why lossy codecs will discard all audio information above the 16-KHz threshold when they're configured to output the smallest possible files [lowest bit-rates]. Most of the time, lossy encoders makes good decisions regarding which bits of audio information to keep and which bits to discard. But not always. Certain types of music are more difficult to encode than others. [Music that contains a lot of "transients" is particularly difficult to encode.] Music that is more difficult to encode has a greater chance of 'tricking' the encoder into making poor decisions about which bits keep/discard. This is especially true with lower bit-rate files [<128-kbps], where each bit is crucial to preserving the quality of the music. ___________________________________ As Freddie said..."I WANT IT ALL" Last note: Imagine yourself in the future for a minute. You've got your mp3(which was lossy to start with) ,and you've put it on your CD to play as normal. ...a year later you decide to share ,so you rip it into Mp3 again - losing more from what was already lost to start with. And the cycle continues. In 10 years time YOU will be complaining that the quality isnt good on that show. ..This is why you need to learn about lossless Same with video ___________________________________ |
The Real Wizard 06.10.2006 03:55 |
928 wrote: It's a known fact that the human ear has difficulty detecting a soft note played immediately after a loud one [e.g. a quiet whisper following a loud shout]. The lossy encoder will see this and discard the bits representing soft notes immediately following loud ones. The goal here is to generate a smaller file with [hopefully] minimal loss of audio fidelity. It's also known that humans have trouble hearing sounds above 16-KHz. This is why lossy codecs will discard all audio information above the 16-KHz threshold when they're configured to output the smallest possible files [lowest bit-rates]. Most of the time, lossy encoders makes good decisions regarding which bits of audio information to keep and which bits to discard. But not always. Certain types of music are more difficult to encode than others. [Music that contains a lot of "transients" is particularly difficult to encode.] Music that is more difficult to encode has a greater chance of 'tricking' the encoder into making poor decisions about which bits keep/discard. This is especially true with lower bit-rate files [<128-kbps], where each bit is crucial to preserving the quality of the music.Very interesting post! |
Nummer2 06.10.2006 04:08 |
Tatterdemalion, you're great! Many thanks! Is there anybody willing to put the show up as a torrent if he has downloaded it completely? IMO files of that size are better to handle as torrent, it takes longer, but you don't have to think about (or pay for) the download. |
Queenman!! 06.10.2006 04:40 |
I prefer a torrent too. But thanks anyway for uploading. Great concert! |
Sithmarauder 06.10.2006 05:15 |
928 wrote: (use nero express to burn & dont forget to tick the box to remove the 2 second gaps between songs) Flac plugin for nero..... link follow the instructions to install and then burn your lossless flacs in nero as you would your orrible ,nasty ,lossy mp3's...hehehe. Now you have EXACTLY what was recorded on THE night. LOSSLESS v LOSSY I try to keep my terminology straight. In other words, I refer to lossy codecs as encoders, and lossless codecs as compressors. It's a subtle difference, and one you'll see ignored by some people, who use the terms interchangably [encoder & compressor]. But lossless codecs do not "encode" per se. They merely compress [crunch]. Lossy codecs, on the other hand, do more than compress: they encode, which involves discarding selected bits deemed unnecessary. It's a known fact that the human ear has difficulty detecting a soft note played immediately after a loud one [e.g. a quiet whisper following a loud shout]. The lossy encoder will see this and discard the bits representing soft notes immediately following loud ones. The goal here is to generate a smaller file with [hopefully] minimal loss of audio fidelity. It's also known that humans have trouble hearing sounds above 16-KHz. This is why lossy codecs will discard all audio information above the 16-KHz threshold when they're configured to output the smallest possible files [lowest bit-rates]. Most of the time, lossy encoders makes good decisions regarding which bits of audio information to keep and which bits to discard. But not always. Certain types of music are more difficult to encode than others. [Music that contains a lot of "transients" is particularly difficult to encode.] Music that is more difficult to encode has a greater chance of 'tricking' the encoder into making poor decisions about which bits keep/discard. This is especially true with lower bit-rate files [<128-kbps], where each bit is crucial to preserving the quality of the music. ___________________________________ As Freddie said..."I WANT IT ALL" Last note: Imagine yourself in the future for a minute. You've got your mp3(which was lossy to start with) ,and you've put it on your CD to play as normal. ...a year later you decide to share ,so you rip it into Mp3 again - losing more from what was already lost to start with. And the cycle continues. In 10 years time YOU will be complaining that the quality isnt good on that show. ..This is why you need to learn about lossless Same with video ___________________________________Education post of the year. Thank you for this info 928! You should have made this a New Announce. This was worth reading. Very Interesting. |
deleted user 06.10.2006 05:20 |
Could anybody make a torrent of these files please i cant download from Rapidshare |
deleted user 06.10.2006 05:30 |
<font color=orange><b>Freddies son</b wrote: Could anybody make a torrent of these files please i cant download from Rapidsharelink ;) |
pow wow 06.10.2006 06:14 |
Thank you very much for sharing this, appreciated. |
aneurysm 06.10.2006 06:35 |
Is this audience or soundboard recording? |
deleted user 06.10.2006 06:40 |
aneurysm wrote: Is this audience or soundboard recording?Audience. |
freddie lives 28817 06.10.2006 08:39 |
Thanks! |
Bobby_brown 06.10.2006 10:47 |
Thanks for sharing! Take care |
Maxxbono 06.10.2006 15:29 |
just heard it... ahhh!!! it has a few cuts and WWRY is incomplete, but hey!!! what an amazing recording, I love it!!! Thank you so much, Tatterdemalion!!! |
bitesthedust 07.10.2006 05:43 |
The original post claims the upload is complete...anyways looking forward to this! |
deleted user 07.10.2006 06:02 |
The previous source lacked We Will Rock You and had a too low pitch. |
bitesthedust 08.10.2006 04:49 |
Could someone upload artwork for this show, preferably from the Stadium Rock release? |
vlatko 09.10.2006 13:29 |
thank you for sharing this! |
lenin 14.10.2006 12:30 |
MISTAKE. SORRY |
Josh Henson 14.10.2006 23:00 |
|
takashi_kitada 15.10.2006 03:04 |
Many Thanks!! |
tassilo 15.10.2006 05:28 |
Thanks a lot! |
kudilja 24.10.2006 13:33 |
hi! parts 1/2 are not working anymore,please, could someone re-upload them? thanks! |
MDNA 25.10.2006 04:37 |
kudilja wrote: hi! parts 1/2 are not working anymore,please, could someone re-upload them? thanks!Tell me exactly wich tracks are missing and I will try to upload them as soon as possible. |
kudilja 25.10.2006 06:26 |
hi! well, missing tracks are: 1. Flash 2. The Hero 3. We Will Rock You (Fast) 4. Action This Day 5. Somebody To Love 6. Calling All Girls thanks! |
MDNA 25.10.2006 11:05 |
here is part 1 of the missing files. I will post the link to part two as soon as it is uploaded. link link |
kudilja 25.10.2006 13:28 |
thanks!! |
takashi_kitada 27.10.2006 02:40 |
Good!! Thank you for sharing this show. |
zurich 30.10.2006 11:18 |
Hmm, parts 1 & 2 are no longer working. Can someone please post again??? Thanks for the rest of the show! |
MDNA 30.10.2006 11:58 |
Look at the third post above yours. |
Panopticon 22.11.2006 10:51 |
Anyone know where to find the DVD of Japan 1982? |
CzarQ 01.12.2006 04:21 |
Can anyone put the files on rapidshare again or make a torrent??? Thanx, bye!!! |
Ginger01 01.12.2006 17:59 |
Hi, I've made a torrent and uploaded it - see separate announce thread. |
Carthoris 30.12.2006 14:10 |
Great concert.I listened to it once, then again thanks for sharing! |
Masahiko 07.06.2007 09:53 |
Please reseed this show. Thanks in advance. |
Frame 07.06.2007 14:08 |
the links are not working anymore... please, can somebody re-upload the show on rapidshare or something like that? thanxxx |
marvinp01 18.12.2008 15:10 |
WTF no files!!! |
tjleone 18.12.2008 21:54 |
The 2 torrents for this same show are currently being seeded by me. The files as far as I know are fine in the torrents. |