Guys,
Freddie was way hotter than Roger. Roger was too baby faced and boyish to be really sexy. To me, he just looks like a girl. At first Freddie looked the same way. In the first 2 Queen albums, his voice sounds like a girl, and he was not hot at all. But by the mid-1970s, Freddie started to mature. His voice became more manly and he was not as skinny as he had been previously. Plus, the camara never even focuses on Roger. I mean, you only get short glimpses of him, whereas the camara is always on Freddie.
By the 1980s, Freddie became so masculine that I cannot see why ANYONE would prefer Roger. Now, I am not saying that Roger was not hot too. I am just saying that he looks too much like a girl. Am I right about this, or what?
I don't know why I reply but, anyway, must be tired.
I find Roger has a sex-appeal.
Both are seducers.
But Freddie has his great charisma which makes him more attractive than Roger.
I agree with the first poster. I think Roger would get the majority vote in the same way people like Brad Pitt, Johnny Depp etc- sure, he is/was pretty but..that's the one you're *supposed* to think is handsome. Freddie gets my vote on three counts, originality, a better body...and for NOT having been Roger when this was taken! link
deleted user 28.09.2006 12:27
I'm just waiting for people to come and moan and groan about 'yet ANOTHER 'I think so-and-so's hotter' thread' and the usual slamming of the teenagers will ensue. Still I think Roger was the hotter! He does look very sexy in some photos, has an 'infectious sense of fun,' and always looked very cute. Yet I also like the fact that he clearly embraced his (very) feminine side and find his schoolgirl attire attractive! Lesbian? Me? Never?
Still we all know that Roger and Freddie both look like Quasimodo compared with a certain Mr Deacon John... ;D
By far the hottest, and the best bod ;D ;D
I have to say I'm tired of these threads, they're giving teenagers a bad name around here. But really, saying Roger looks like a girl? That's a bit of an exaggeration.
